(E.1-2) (Appendix E) Geomorphology of the Hells Canyon Reach of the Snake River

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

(E.1-2) (Appendix E) Geomorphology of the Hells Canyon Reach of the Snake River APPENDIX E Interpretation of Current and Historical Sediment Movement from Bedrock Exposed in Hells Canyon This page left blank intentionally. Interpretation of Current and Historical Sediment Movement from Bedrock Exposed in Hells Canyon This appendix provides a more detailed hillslope analysis for the Snake River within Hells Canyon. Specifically, a slope classification analysis is followed by a detailed discussion regarding rock varnish. The objective of this appendix is to provide a semi- quantitative evaluation of sediment sources to the local tributaries and mainstem from hillslope processes. E.1. Slope Classifications Figure 5.15 in the main report shows the five slope classifications for hillside slopes in the Hells Canyon drainage basin (excluding the Imnaha River and Salmon River tributary drainage basins). Each of the five slope classes show the hillside surface area that is classified within each of these slope classes. Most of the surface area (52 percent) in the drainage basin has a hillside slope between 40 and 60 degrees (Photos 4 and 7) (Table 5.15). Further, an additional 10 percent of the surface area has an unusual slope greater than 60 degrees from horizontal. Much of the earth’s surface would be adequately described using hillside slopes within the first three slope classes of less than 10 degrees, 10 to 30 degrees, and 30 to 40 degrees). For example, floodplains frequently fall within the less than 10-degree slope class and hillsides adjacent to the floodplain are frequently within the 10- to 30-degree slope class. These slopes result because most of these surfaces have been exposed for sufficient geologic time to weather and erode accordingly. The dominantly high slopes in Hells Canyon indicate a very young surface; one that has been exposed to earth surface weathering processes and rapid downcutting by the Snake River for only a very short geologic time. Steep slopes typically weather to a “maximum angle of slope at which loose, cohesionless material” of similar composition “will come to rest” (Gray et al. 1974) called the angle of repose. The angle of repose commonly ranges between 33 and 37 degrees from the horizontal and is rarely less than 30 or more than 39 degrees. Therefore, the third slope classification ranging between 30 and 40 degrees represents the angle of repose, where loose particles on most sediment mantled slopes cluster at incipient motion. In other words, within this slope class, sediment particles move tending to slide or otherwise easily move downslope and the slope is subsequently retained within this slope range. Therefore, most of the surface with 30- to 39-degree slopes is likely to be loose material of variable particle sizes forming scree slopes and talus piles, while surfaces exceeding this slope are almost certainly bedrock. In bedrock-dominated environments such as Hells Canyon, bedrock surfaces in the upper two slope classes will tend toward catastrophic episodes of failure generally in the form of a landslide as a result of natural earth surface weathering processes, particularly surfaces in the greater than 60-degree slope class. E.1.1. Slopes Less Than 10 Degrees There are several very unusual characteristics to the surface locations within slope classes of the Hells Canyon drainage. The lowest slope class, surfaces with less than 10 degrees, are usually found associated with the floodplain of a river and this is also largely true for the Snake River in the Hells Canyon and for the terraces created by the Bonneville Flood. However, most of the significant areas in this slope class are in the uppermost headwaters of the tributary creeks. With the exception of the alluvium and terrace gravels, this positioning is the inverse of the typical drainage where drainage basins increase in slope toward the headwaters and have their highest surface slopes in the headwater area where bedrock or more resistant alluvial sediments impede headcutting. The headwaters of Wolf, Divide, Cherry, and Deep creeks are the major creeks with greater than 5 percent of their total surface area in the less than 10-degree slope class (Table 5.6), with most of this surface area in the uppermost headwaters adjacent to Hells Canyon drainage divide rather than adjacent to the Snake River. Almost all of these surface areas are below approximately RM 217. Most of this surface is probably related to relatively flat-lying Columbia River Basalts that rim essentially the entire Oregon drainage divide of Hells Canyon, but only begin to rim the Idaho side at about RM 220 (Table 5.7). E.1.2. Slopes Between 10 and 30 Degrees In the 10- to 30-degree slope class, Divide Creek has the most surface area. Approximately 42 percent of the total surface area of Divide Creek is in this slope class and more than 50 percent of the surface area of Divide Creek has a slope of less than 30 degrees. This would normally be correlated with age/degree of weathering, but in this case it is also probably a result of the large expanse of relatively flat-lying Columbia River Basalts in this drainage basin. Almost 90 percent of the alluvium surface area is less than 30 degrees (Table 5.7), but 53 percent is in the 10 to 30 percent slope class which is probably related to a relatively large alluvium surface area related to landslides and relatively small alluvial footprint of the Snake River. The surfaces of Bonneville terrace gravels also have a higher percentage in this slope class (46 percent) than in the less than 10 percent slope class (27 percent), which may be related to their steep side slope adjacent to the Snake River. E.1.3. Slopes Between 30 and 40 Degrees Downriver of RM 217, surface areas with this slopes between 30 and 40 degrees cluster somewhat near the river. In general, surface areas within this slope class are particularly widely dispersed in the lower half of the drainage basin below about RM 217, but this slope class is also common in the tributaries of the upper half of the basin. The widespread distribution of this slope class indicates that a considerable amount of sediment is stored within the tributaries awaiting transport into the Snake River. The basin does not appear to be supply limited. Field observations from walking up several of the tributaries confirmed a general prevalence of sediment stored within the tributaries apparently awaiting sufficient surface water flow to transport the sediment into the Snake River. Above about RM 217, this slope class clusters into a medial to headwater drainage basin position. Since this slope class is typically associated with sediments achieving an angle of repose, this distribution would indicate that a considerable surface area of stored sediment is relatively evenly distributed in the lower part of the drainage basin on scree slopes and talus piles within individual tributary drainages and adjacent to the Snake River. However, in the upper part of the drainage, sediment is stored in the medial and upper part of the individual drainage basins, which are relatively more isolated from the Snake River. With the exception of alluvium and glacial deposits, this slope class does not distinguish between lithologic units. This slope class accounts for 10 to 20 percent of the surface area of all lithologic units with terrace gravels and landslides tending toward 30 degrees and Columbia River Basalt tending toward 40 degrees. This slope class accounts for less than 10 percent of the alluvium and glacial deposit surface area. E.1.4. Slopes Between 40 and 60 Degrees By far the most dominant slope class in the drainage basin, this slope class indicates bedrock outcrops dominate the Hells Canyon drainage ranging from 30 percent (Wolf and Divide creeks; Table 5.6) to 65 percent (Big Canyon Creek). The widespread extent of this slope class is not unexpected, given the physiographic descriptions of Hells Canyon. However, this slope class also appears to represent a significant classification break point at RM 220 (Figure 5.15). Upstream from about RM 220, slopes greater than 60 degrees account for most of the remaining surface coverage. Downstream from RM 220, slopes less than 40 degrees account for most of the remaining surface area for this slope class. This implies that above about RM 220 there appears to be more recent, significantly higher geological uplift than below about RM 220. This slope class includes 50 to 60 percent of the surface area for Columbia River Basalt (49 percent), metamorphic rocks (52 percent) and intrusive rocks (59 percent). Most of the landslide surface area is in this slope class (42 percent). Finally, almost all (81 percent) of the glacial deposits occupy this slope class. E.1.5. Slopes Greater Than 60 Degrees Most of the surface area of Hells Canyon with slopes greater than 60 degrees are located adjacent to the Snake River in the lower parts of individual drainage basins above about RM 217. This slope class is associated with the scenic high canyon walls on both sides of the canyon above about RM 235 and mostly on the eastern side of the canyon between RM 235 and RM 217. This slope class also extends into the mainstem from the downstream areas of Deep, Granite, and Sheep creek channels, rather than at the headwaters of these individual drainage basins. These relationships indicate that there has been, and probably continues to be, more rapid downcutting in the upper part of the Hells Canyon than in the lower part of the canyon. Rapid downcutting (high slope classes) is probably responsible for the linear character of the Snake River and most tributary drainages because the surface water follows and cuts along linear weaknesses in the bedrock such as faults, joints, and fractures.
Recommended publications
  • Mesofauna at the Soil-Scree Interface in a Deep Karst Environment
    diversity Article Mesofauna at the Soil-Scree Interface in a Deep Karst Environment Nikola Jureková 1,* , Natália Raschmanová 1 , Dana Miklisová 2 and L’ubomír Kováˇc 1 1 Department of Zoology, Institute of Biology and Ecology, Faculty of Science, Pavol Jozef Šafárik University in Košice, Šrobárova 2, SK-04180 Košice, Slovakia; [email protected] (N.R.); [email protected] (L’.K.) 2 Institute of Parasitology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Hlinkova 3, SK-04001 Košice, Slovakia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: The community patterns of Collembola (Hexapoda) were studied at two sites along a microclimatically inversed scree slope in a deep karst valley in the Western Carpathians, Slovakia, in warm and cold periods of the year, respectively. Significantly lower average temperatures in the scree profile were noted at the gorge bottom in both periods, meaning that the site in the lower part of the scree, near the bank of creek, was considerably colder and wetter compared to the warmer and drier site at upper part of the scree slope. Relatively high diversity of Collembola was observed at two fieldwork scree sites, where cold-adapted species, considered climatic relicts, showed considerable abundance. The gorge bottom, with a cold and wet microclimate and high carbon content even in the deeper MSS horizons, provided suitable environmental conditions for numerous psychrophilic and subterranean species. Ecological groups such as trogloxenes and subtroglophiles showed decreasing trends of abundance with depth, in contrast to eutroglophiles and a troglobiont showing an opposite distributional pattern at scree sites in both periods. Our study documented that in terms of soil and Citation: Jureková, N.; subterranean mesofauna, colluvial screes of deep karst gorges represent (1) a transition zone between Raschmanová, N.; Miklisová, D.; the surface and the deep subterranean environment, and (2) important climate change refugia.
    [Show full text]
  • Landslides and the Weathering of Granitic Rocks
    Geological Society of America Reviews in Engineering Geology, Volume III © 1977 7 Landslides and the weathering of granitic rocks PHILIP B. DURGIN Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Berkeley, California 94701 (stationed at Arcata, California 95521) ABSTRACT decomposition, so they commonly occur as mountainous ero- sional remnants. Nevertheless, granitoids undergo progressive Granitic batholiths around the Pacific Ocean basin provide physical, chemical, and biological weathering that weakens examples of landslide types that characterize progressive stages the rock and prepares it for mass movement. Rainstorms and of weathering. The stages include (1) fresh rock, (2) core- earthquakes then trigger slides at susceptible sites. stones, (3) decomposed granitoid, and (4) saprolite. Fresh The minerals of granitic rock weather according to this granitoid is subject to rockfalls, rockslides, and block glides. sequence: plagioclase feldspar, biotite, potassium feldspar, They are all controlled by factors related to jointing. Smooth muscovite, and quartz. Biotite is a particularly active agent in surfaces of sheeted fresh granite encourage debris avalanches the weathering process of granite. It expands to form hydro- or debris slides in the overlying material. The corestone phase biotite that helps disintegrate the rock into grus (Wahrhaftig, is characterized by unweathered granitic blocks or boulders 1965; Isherwood and Street, 1976). The feldspars break down within decomposed rock. Hazards at this stage are rockfall by hyrolysis and hydration into clays and colloids, which may avalanches and rolling rocks. Decomposed granitoid is rock migrate from the rock. Muscovite and quartz grains weather that has undergone granular disintegration. Its characteristic slowly and usually form the skeleton of saprolite.
    [Show full text]
  • Maternal Defensive Behavior of Mountain Goats Against Predation by Golden Eagles
    Western North American Naturalist Volume 69 Number 1 Article 13 4-24-2009 Maternal defensive behavior of mountain goats against predation by Golden Eagles Sandra Hamel Université Laval, Québec, Canada, [email protected] Steeve D. Côté Université Laval, Québec, Canada, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/wnan Recommended Citation Hamel, Sandra and Côté, Steeve D. (2009) "Maternal defensive behavior of mountain goats against predation by Golden Eagles," Western North American Naturalist: Vol. 69 : No. 1 , Article 13. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/wnan/vol69/iss1/13 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by the Western North American Naturalist Publications at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Western North American Naturalist by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Western North American Naturalist 69(1), © 2009, pp. 115–118 MATERNAL DEFENSIVE BEHAVIOR OF MOUNTAIN GOATS AGAINST PREDATION BY GOLDEN EAGLES Sandra Hamel1,2 and Steeve D. Côté1 ABSTRACT.—Maternal defensive behavior against predators may appear risky but is common in many species. Herein we describe maternal defensive behavior of mountain goats (Oreamnos americanus) against Golden Eagle (Aquila chrysaetos) predatory attempts. We found that Golden Eagles attacked goats in 1.9% of sightings (n = 311 sightings of active Golden Eagles over 12 years) but were never successful. Mothers always defended their young against Golden Eagle attacks. Predation by Golden Eagles on young-of-the-year appears low for most ungulate species, including mountain goats.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ice Age in Pennsylvania 13
    Educational Series 6 PENNSYLVANIA AND THE ICE AGE An Equal Opportunity/ Affirmative Action Employer Recycled Paper 2200–BK–DCNR3061 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA Tom Ridge, Governor DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES John C. Oliver, Secretary OFFICE OF CONSERVATION AND ENGINEERING SERVICES Richard G. Sprenkle, Deputy Secretary BUREAU OF TOPOGRAPHIC AND GEOLOGIC SURVEY Donald M. Hoskins, Director FRONT COVER: The wooly mammoth—a Pennsylvania resident during the Ice Age (modified from Thomas, D. J., and others, 1987, Pleistocene and Holocene geology of a dynamic coast, Annual Field Conference of Pennsyl- vania Geologists, 52nd, Erie, Pa., Guidebook, front cover). Educational Series 6 Pennsylvania and the Ice Age by W. D. Sevon and Gary M. Fleeger PENNSYLVANIA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY FOURTH SERIES HARRISBURG 1999 When reproducing material from this book, please cite the source as follows: Sevon, W. D., and Fleeger, G. M., 1999, Pennsylvania and the Ice Age (2nd ed.): Pennsylvania Geological Survey, 4th ser., Educational Series 6, 30 p. Pennsylvania World Wide Web site: www.state.pa.us Department of Conservation and Natural Resources World Wide Web site: www.dcnr.state.pa.us Bureau of Topographic and Geologic Survey World Wide Web site: www.dcnr.state.pa.us/topogeo Illustrations drafted by John G. Kuchinski First Edition, 1962 Fifth Printing, May 1978 Second Edition, May 1999 PENNSYLVANIA AND THE ICE AGE by W. D. Sevon and Gary M. Fleeger Have you heard the story of the Ice Age, a time when large sheets of moving ice (glaciers) blanketed the northern half of North America? Unbelievable though it may seem, half of our continent was once buried beneath thousands of feet of ice.
    [Show full text]
  • A Botanical Survey of the Goodnews Bay Region, Alaska
    A BOTANICAL SURVEY OF THE GOODNEWS BAY REGION, ALASKA Robert Lipkin Alaska Natural Heritage Program ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES INSTITUTE UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA ANCHORAGE 707 A Street, Anchorage, AK 99501 In cooperation with the U.S. Bureau of Land Management Anchorage District 6881 Abbott Loop Road, Anchorage, AK 99507 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This report is a continuation of a cooperative relationship begun in 1990 between the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and the Alaska Natural Heritage Program (AKNHP). We would like to thank Jeff Denton of the Anchorage District, BLM, who was instrumental in initiating this particular project and who has evinced continual interest in the rare plants of the District. Jeff Denton and the Anchorage District provided transportation and all other logistical support of the field work, without which this survey would not have been possible. I would also like to acknowledge and thank the other members of the field team including: Julie Michaelson (AKNHP), Alan Batten (University of Alaska Museum), Virginia Moran (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Western Alaska Ecological Service), and Debbie Blank of the BLM State Office. Debbie Blank not only participated in the field work, but also in the thankless tasks of specimen sorting and data entry. Alan Batten identified or verified the aquatic collections. Thanks also go to David Murray, Curator Emeritus of the Herbarium of the University of Alaska Museum, for his assistance with identifications of several critical taxa. The collections and literature files at the Herbarium provided invaluable help in completing the plant identifications and in evaluating their significance. June Mcatee of Calista Corporation provided valuable background information on the geology of the region.
    [Show full text]
  • Stop Losing Ground to Erosion Kimberly Laframboise Ecologist Michalski Nielsen Associates Limited Forms of Erosion
    Stop Losing Ground to Erosion Kimberly Laframboise Ecologist Michalski Nielsen Associates limited Forms of Erosion Surface erosion Mass-movement Sheet erosion erosion Slips, earth flaws Wind erosion Wave action Scree erosion Fluvial erosion Streambank erosion Rill erosion Gully erosion Tunnel gullying Erosion- NATURAL Derived from the Latin word rodere meaning to ‘gnaw’ Natural process in which we have little to no control over Soil types Slope Lake effect winds (wave action) Storms Natural streams and channels Erosion- MAN MADE Erosion is a natural process but is often intensified by human land use practices Process in which we contribute to erosion Stripping of vegetation and removal of mature trees (established root systems) Slope (by design) Livestock, Cultivation Wave action Bad land use planning Known the Signs - Become a Erosion Detective Source: DFO http://www.qc.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/infoceans/Infoceans200609-eng.html Understanding Erosion Perceptions Low Impact Development Approaches to development on your property that provide for “low impact” on the environment Permeable pavements “porous pavement”- allowing water to soak in around the home. Rain Gardens Bioswales Perceptions Source: Ecoslim http://www.ecosim.ca/ELCWebApp/consult.html Source: Ecoslim http://www.ecosim.ca/ELCWebApp/consult.html Source: Ecoslim http://www.ecosim.ca/ELCWebApp/consult.html What Types of Erosion Problems do You Have? Simple and Effective Ways to Stop Losing Ground to Erosion Many fixes are simple and Not intended for larger scale
    [Show full text]
  • Rates of Frost Erosion in River Banks with Different Particle Size (West Carpathians, Poland)
    Geogr. Fis. Dinam. Quat. DOI 10.4461/GFDQ.2017.40.1 40 (2017). 5-17, 10 figg. 1 1 KA ROL AUGUSTOWSKI , JÓZEF KUKULAK RATES OF FROST EROSION IN RIVER BANKS WITH DIFFERENT PARTICLE SIZE (WEST CARPATHIANS, POLAND) ABSTRT AC : AUGUSTOWSKI K. & KUKULAK J., Rates of frost erosion stoków teras rzecznych i podcięć ścian skalnych) przy pomocy zamon- in river banks with different particle size (West Carpathians, Poland). towanych prętów erozyjnych i łapaczy materiału osypiskowego. Przebieg (IT ISSN 0391-9839, 2017). czasowy i rozmiary erozji brzegów skorelowano z zapisem wahań tem- peratury powietrza nad gruntem i w gruncie. Wyniki badań wykazały, że An important process of river bank erosion is multigelation - alter- multigelacja spowodowała duże przekształcania powierzchni badanych nating freezing and thawing of the banks caused by cyclical oscillation brzegów. Rozmiary erozji brzegów były zależne głównie od litologii i of ground temperature around 0 °C. This paper presents the results of uziarnienia materiału skalnego budującego brzegi. Brzegi zbudowane studies on the influence of multigelation on stability of river banks in the z materiału drobnego cofały się na całej wysokości ich odsłonięcia w Beskid Niski and at Podhale. Repeated measurements of scarp retreat on podobny sposób, a ubytki były jednakowe. Przebieg procesów mro- river banks (those composed of alluvium and those cut in bedrock) were zowych na brzegach zbudowanych ze średnich żwirów był bardziej conducted using erosion pins and sediment catchers for gravity-trans- selektywny. Najdrobniejszy materiał ulegał odspojeniu jako pierwszy. ported debris. The progress of erosion in time and amounts of eroded W konsekwencji grubsze żwiry traciły stabilność i przy zsuwaniu się po material were correlated with the record of temperature changes above powierzchni brzegu naruszały spójność niżej położonych okruchów.
    [Show full text]
  • Weathering, Erosion, and Mass-Wasting Processes
    Weathering, Erosion, and Mass-Wasting Processes Designed to meet South Carolina Department of Education 2005 Science Academic Standards 1 Table of Contents (1 of 2) Definitions: Weathering, Erosion, and Mass-Wasting (slide 4) (Standards: 3-3.8 ; 5-3.1) Types of Weathering (slide 5) (Standards: 3-3.8 ; 5-3.1) Mechanical Weathering (slide 6) (Standards: 3-3.8 ; 5-3.1) Exfoliation (slide 7) (Standards: 3-3.8 ; 5-3.1) Frost Wedging (slide 8) (Standards: 3-3.8 ; 5-3.1) Temperature Change (slide 9) (Standards: 3-3.8 ; 5-3.1) Salt Wedging (slide 10) (Standards: 3-3.8 ; 5-3.1) Abrasion (slide 11) (Standards: 3-3.8 ; 5-3.1) Chemical Weathering (slide 12) (Standards: 3-3.8 ; 5-3.1) Carbonation (slide 13) (Standards: 3-3.8 ; 5-3.1) Hydrolysis (slide 14) (Standards: 3-3.8 ; 5-3.1) Hydration (slide 15) (Standards: 3-3.8 ; 5-3.1) Oxidation (slide 16) (Standards: 3-3.8 ; 5-3.1) Solution (slide 17) (Standards: 3-3.8 ; 5-3.1) Biological Weathering (slide 18) (Standards: 3-3.8 ; 5-3.1) Lichen, Algae, and Decaying Plants (slide 19) (Standards: 3-3.8 ; 5-3.1) Plant Roots (slide 20) (Standards: 3-3.8 ; 5-3.1) Organism Activity: Burrowing, Tunneling, and Acid Secreting Organisms (slide 21) (Standards: 3-3.8 ; 5-3.1) Differential Weathering (slide 22) (Standards: 3-3.8 ; 5-3.1) 2 Table of Contents, cont. (2 of 2) Types of Erosion (slide 23) (Standards: 3-3.8 ; 5-3.1) Fluvial (slide 24) (Standards: 3-3.8 ; 5-3.1) Aeolian (slide 25) (Standards: 3-3.8 ; 5-3.1) Ice: Glacial and Periglacial (slide 26) (Standards: 3-3.8 ; 5-3.1) Gravity (slide
    [Show full text]
  • Inland Rock Outcrop and Scree Habitats (Uk Bap Priority Habitat)
    INLAND ROCK OUTCROP AND SCREE HABITATS (UK BAP PRIORITY HABITAT) Summary This priority type includes plant communities that are confined or almost confined to inaccessible ledges on cliffs and crags or to screes and boulders. The predominant controlling factor is the base-status of the rock which determines what the vegetation consists of. There are communities of smaller ferns on small ledges, and in crevices, on screes and boulder-fields, and boulder-scree on sheltered slopes where snow lies late in spring. The habitat is common throughout the uplands where extensive glaciation has resulted in steep cliffs and outcrops, screes and block litter, though there are also examples on river cliffs in the lowlands, and the small fern communities can occur on walls and buildings. This priority habitat occurs throughout Scotland from just above sea level to over 1000 m on our highest hills. Rock and scree habitats are home to many rare and uncommon species. Boulder-fields, screes and high ledges where snow lies very late are habitats for snow-tolerant species. This priority habitat is also very important for lichens which are often the dominant life-form. Inland crags are the preferred nesting sites of golden eagle Aquila chrysaetos, sea eagle Haliaeetus albicilla, raven Corvus corax and peregrine falcon Falco peregrinus, whilst snow buntings Plectrophenax nivalis nest among boulders in high corries. The vegetation is near- natural. Being out of the reach of all grazing animals apart from goats, and being difficult to burn, these communities are not threatened by many human activities apart from some disturbance by climbers.
    [Show full text]
  • Alpine Ecosystems
    TWENTY-NINE Alpine Ecosystems PHILIP W. RUNDEL and CONSTANCE I. MILLAR Introduction Alpine ecosystems comprise some of the most intriguing hab­ writing about the alpine meadows of the Sierra Nevada, felt itats of the world for the stark beauty of their landscapes and his words were inadequate to describe “the exquisite beauty for the extremes of the physical environment that their resi­ of these mountain carpets as they lie smoothly outspread in dent biota must survive. These habitats lie above the upper the savage wilderness” (Muir 1894). limit of tree growth but seasonally present spectacular flo­ ral shows of low-growing herbaceous perennial plants. Glob­ ally, alpine ecosystems cover only about 3% of the world’s Defining Alpine Ecosystems land area (Körner 2003). Their biomass is low compared to shrublands and woodlands, giving these ecosystems only a Alpine ecosystems are classically defined as those communi­ minor role in global biogeochemical cycling. Moreover, spe­ ties occurring above the elevation of treeline. However, defin­ cies diversity and local endemism of alpine ecosystems is rela­ ing the characteristics that unambiguously characterize an tively low. However, alpine areas are critical regions for influ­ alpine ecosystem is problematic. Defining alpine ecosystems encing hydrologic flow to lowland areas from snowmelt. based on presence of alpine-like communities of herbaceous The alpine ecosystems of California present a special perennials is common but subject to interpretation because case among alpine regions of the world. Unlike most alpine such communities may occur well below treeline, while other regions, including the American Rocky Mountains and the areas well above treeline may support dense shrub or matted European Alps (where most research on alpine ecology has tree cover.
    [Show full text]
  • Water, Weathering, Erosion, Soil, and Mass Wasting
    Water, Weathering, Erosion, Soil, and Mass Wasting www.dummies.com/how-to/content/the-unusual-properties-of-water-molecules.html www.wwnorton.com/college/chemistry/gilbert2/tutorials/chapter_10/water_h_bond/ www.kfpe.ch/projects/echangesuniv/Fontbote.phpwww.mhhe.com Thompson higher education 2007 Wikipedia GC Herman 2013 Water, Weathering, Erosion, Soil, and Mass Wasting • The unique properties of H 2O • Weathering and erosion • Mechanical weathering - disaggregation of Earth Materials • Chemical weathering - decomposition of Earth Materials • Scree and Talus • Regolith • Soil • Erosion • Mass wasting GC Herman 2013 H2O – Water, Ice, and Vapor •The liquid form of H 2O is water, the most abundant compound on Earth's surface, covering about 70 % of the planet. •It is a tasteless, odorless liquid at ambient temperature and pressure, and appears colorless in small quantities, Weathered steeply-dipping rocks although it has its own intrinsic very light blue hue. •The solid form, ice, also appears colorless, and water vapor is essentially invisible as a gas. GC Herman 2013 Water (H 2O) • Water’s unique properties: • Dielectric Strength • Hydrogen bridges between molecules • Universal Solvent • Wide range of temperature and pressure conditions under which it liquid • Water contraction and expansion • Ice, steam, fog, and vapor • Directional flows influenced by gravity and electrical fields • Cohesion and adhesion • Surface tension • Specific heat • Poor conductor of heat • The tendency to form colloids with other elements GC Herman 2013 Water (H 2O) Water’s unique properties • Water is the chemical substance with chemical formula H 2O: one molecule of water has two hydrogen atoms covalently bonded to a single oxygen atom. • Water’s unique bonding achieves molecular neutrality but molecular asymmetry.
    [Show full text]
  • Mountain Permafrost Degradation Documented Through a Network of Permanent Electrical Resistivity Tomography Sites
    The Cryosphere Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2018-272 Manuscript under review for journal The Cryosphere Discussion started: 21 December 2018 c Author(s) 2018. CC BY 4.0 License. Mountain permafrost degradation documented through a network of permanent electrical resistivity tomography sites Coline Mollaret1, Christin Hilbich1, Cécile Pellet1, Adrian Flores-Orozco2, Reynald Delaloye1, Christian 5 Hauck1 1Department of Geosciences, University of Fribourg, Switzerland 2Department of Geodesy and Geoinformation, TU Wien, Austria Correspondence to: Coline Mollaret ([email protected]) 10 Abstract. Mountain permafrost is sensitive to climate change and is expected to gradually degrade in response to the ongoing atmospheric warming trend. Long-term monitoring the permafrost thermal state is a key task, but it is problematic where temperatures are close to 0°C. The energy exchange is indeed often dominantly related to latent heat effects associated with phase change (ice/water), rather than ground warming or cooling. Consequently, it is difficult to detect significant spatio- temporal variations of ground properties (e.g. ice-water ratio) that occur during the freezing/thawing process with point scale 15 temperature monitoring alone. Hence, electrical methods have become popular in permafrost investigations as the resistivities of ice and water differ by several orders of magnitude, theoretically allowing a clear distinction between frozen and unfrozen ground. In this study we present an assessment of mountain permafrost evolution using long-term electrical resistivity tomography monitoring (ERTM) from a network of permanent sites in the Central Alps. The time series consist of more than 1000 data sets from six sites, where resistivities have been measured on a regular basis for up to twenty years.
    [Show full text]