EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking
Satellite Communications
Guest Editors: Ray E. Sheriff, Anton Donner, and Alessandro Vanelli-Coralli Satellite Communications EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking Satellite Communications
Guest Editors: Ray E. Sheriff, Anton Donner, and Alessandro Vanelli-Coralli Copyright © 2007 Hindawi Publishing Corporation. All rights reserved.
This is a special issue published in volume 2007 of “EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking.” All articles are open access articles distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Editor-in-Chief Luc Vandendorpe, Universite´ Catholique de Louvain, Belgium
Associate Editors Thushara Abhayapala, Australia David Gesbert, France Marc Moonen, Belgium Mohamed H. Ahmed, Canada Fary Z. Ghassemlooy, UK Eric Moulines, France Farid Ahmed, USA Christian Hartmann, Germany Sayandev Mukherjee, USA Alagan Anpalagan, Canada Stefan Kaiser, Germany Kameswara Rao Namuduri, USA Anthony Boucouvalas, Greece G. K. Karagiannidis, Greece AmiyaNayak,Canada Lin Cai, Canada Chi Chung Ko, Singapore A. Pandharipande, The Netherlands Biao Chen, USA Visa Koivunen, Finland Athina Petropulu, USA Yuh-Shyan Chen, Taiwan Richard Kozick, USA A. Lee Swindlehurst, USA Pascal Chevalier, France Bhaskar Krishnamachari, USA Sergios Theodoridis, Greece Chia-Chin Chong, South Korea S. Lambotharan, UK George S. Tombras, Greece Huaiyu Dai, USA Vincent Lau, Hong Kong Lang Tong, USA Soura Dasgupta, USA DavidI.Laurenson,UK Athanasios V. Vasilakos, Greece Ibrahim Develi, Turkey Tho Le-Ngoc, Canada Weidong Xiang, USA Petar M. Djuric,´ USA Wei Li, USA Yang Xiao, USA Mischa Dohler, France Yonghui Li, Australia Xueshi Yang, USA Abraham O. Fapojuwo, Canada Tongtong Li, USA Lawrence Yeung, Hong Kong Michael Gastpar, USA Zhiqiang Liu, USA Dongmei Zhao, Canada Alex Gershman, Germany Stephen McLaughlin, Scotland Weihua Zhuang, Canada Wolfgang Gerstacker, Germany Sudip Misra, Canada Contents
Satellite Communications,RayE.Sheriff, Anton Donner, and Alessandro Vanelli-Coralli Volume 2007, Article ID 58964, 2 pages
Multi-Satellite MIMO Communications at Ku-Band and Above: Investigations on Spatial Multiplexing for Capacity Improvement and Selection Diversity for Interference Mitigation, Konstantinos P. Liolis, Athanasios D. Panagopoulos, and Panayotis G. Cottis Volume 2007, Article ID 59608, 11 pages
Investigations in Satellite MIMO Channel Modeling: Accent on Polarization,Peter´ Horvath,´ George K. Karagiannidis, Peter R. King, Stavros Stavrou, and Istvan´ Frigyes Volume 2007, Article ID 98942, 10 pages
Performance Analysis of SSC Diversity Receivers over Correlated Ricean Fading Satellite Channels, Petros S. Bithas and P. Takis Mathiopoulos Volume 2007, Article ID 25361, 9 pages
Advanced Fade Countermeasures for DVB-S2 Systems in Railway Scenarios, Stefano Cioni, Cristina Parraga´ Niebla, Gonzalo Seco Granados, Sandro Scalise, Alessandro Vanelli-Coralli, and Mar´ıa Angeles Vazquez´ Castro Volume 2007, Article ID 49718, 17 pages
Capacity Versus Bit Error Rate Trade-Off in the DVB-S2 Forward Link, Matteo Berioli, Christian Kissling, and Remi´ Lapeyre Volume 2007, Article ID 14798, 10 pages
Frequency Estimation in Iterative Interference Cancellation Applied to Multibeam Satellite Systems, J.P.Millerioux,M.L.Boucheret,C.Bazile,andA.Ducasse Volume 2007, Article ID 62310, 12 pages
A QoS Architecture for DVB-RCS Next Generation Satellite Networks,ThierryGayraudand Pascal Berthou Volume 2007, Article ID 58484, 9 pages
Maximum Likelihood Timing and Carrier Synchronization in Burst-Mode Satellite Transmissions, Michele Morelli and Antonio A. D’Amico Volume 2007, Article ID 65058, 8 pages
Burst Format Design for Optimum Joint Estimation of Doppler-Shift and Doppler-Rate in Packet Satellite Communications, Luca Giugno, Francesca Zanier, and Marco Luise Volume 2007, Article ID 29086, 12 pages
TCP-Call Admission Control Interaction in Multiplatform Space Architectures, Georgios Theodoridis, Cesare Roseti, Niovi Pavlidou, and Michele Luglio Volume 2007, Article ID 23923, 8 pages
Efficient Delay Tracking Methods with Sidelobes Cancellation for BOC-Modulated Signals, Adina Burian, Elena Simona Lohan, and Markku Kalevi Renfors Volume 2007, Article ID 72626, 20 pages Analysis of Filter-Bank-Based Methods for Fast Serial Acquisition of BOC-Modulated Signals, ElenaSimonaLohan Volume 2007, Article ID 25178, 12 pages Hindawi Publishing Corporation EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking Volume 2007, Article ID 58964, 2 pages doi:10.1155/2007/58964
Editorial Satellite Communications
Ray E. Sheriff,1 Anton Donner,2 and Alessandro Vanelli-Coralli3
1 Mobile and Satellite Communications Research Centre, School of Engineering, Design and Technology, University of Bradford, Richmond Road Bradford BD7 1DP, UK 2 German Aerospace Center, Institute of Communications and Navigation, Oberpfaffenhofen, 82234 Wessling, Germany 3 ARCES, University of Bologna, Via Toffano 2, 40125 Bologna, Italy
Received 28 November 2007; Accepted 9 December 2007
Copyright © 2007 Ray E. Sheriff et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
We are delighted to bring to you this special issue on satel- ing: accent on polarization” looks at MIMO systems from the lite communications, which we have prepared as part of the polarization diversity point of view and dwells on the satellite spreading of excellence remit of the satellite communica- cooperative communication concepts. tions network of excellence (SatNEx). The SatNEx project, Switch and stay combining (SSC) is a form of diversity which began in 2004, is funded for five years under the Euro- technique used in digital receivers to compensate for fade pean Union’s Sixth Framework Programme (FP6) Informa- events introduced by the mobile channel. The third paper tion Society Technologies (IST) Thematic Area. Led by the “Performance analysis of SSC diversity receivers over corre- German Aerospace Center, SatNEx brings together a network lated Ricean fading satellite channels” investigates the per- of 24 partners, distributed throughout Europe, with mem- formance of dual-branch SSC receivers for different fading bership drawn from ten countries. channel characteristics. The philosophy underlying the SatNEx approach re- The next four papers deal with the emerging scenario volves around the selection of focused actions under Joint of mobile digital video broadcasting (DVB-S2 and RCS mo- Programmes of Activities, which are carried out collectively bile). Alternative approaches to counteracting fading chan- by the partners and include research, integration, and dis- nels introduced when operating in a train environment re- semination activities. Training represents an important part ceiving satellite DVB-S2 are presented in the paper “Ad- of the SatNEx remit and is supported through a number of vanced fade countermeasures for DVB-S2 systems in railway initiatives including the hosting of internship projects and an scenarios.” Here, as a result of simulation analysis, antenna annual summer school. diversity and packet-level forward error correction mecha- The call for papers resulted in a high number of submis- nisms are proposed and their impact is evaluated with respect sions, from which we have been able to select 12 excellent to the receiver design and system complexity. The theme of papers dealing with the different aspects of satellite commu- DVB-S2 is continued with the paper “Capacity versus bit er- nications and navigation. ror rate trade-off in the DVB-S2 forward link,” which inves- Multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) techniques are tigates how satellite capacity can be optimised for DVB-S2 attracting a considerable amount of attention from within transmissions. The DVB return channel via satellite (DVB- the terrestrial wireless community. The first paper of this spe- RCS) is then addressed in “Frequency estimation in iterative cial issue, “Multisatellite MIMO communications at Ku band interference cancellation applied to multibeam satellite sys- and above: investigations on spatial multiplexing for capac- tems,” which considers the application of interference cancel- ity improvement and selection diversity for interference mit- lation on the reverse link of a multibeam satellite system, us- igation,” considers the application of such technology over a ing DVB-RCS with convolutional coding as an example. The satellite platform operating in the Ku band and above. The paper “A QoS architecture for DVB-RCS next-generation paper considers how MIMO can be used to increase capac- satellite networks” proceeds to design and emulate a quality- ity by using a satellite spatial multiplexing system and how of-service (QoS) architecture that demonstrates using real antenna selection can be used to mitigate interference. The multimedia applications how QoS can be supported over a next paper “Investigations in satellite MIMO channel model- DVB-RCS network. 2 EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking
Synchronization aspects are dealt with in “Maximum likelihood timing and carrier synchronization in burst-mode satellite transmissions.” The paper addresses the problem of achieving synchronisation for a burst-mode satellite trans- mission over an AWGN channel. The subject of burst trans- mission continues with the paper “Burst format design for optimum joint estimation of Doppler-shift and Doppler- rate in packet satellite communications,” which considers optimising the burst-format of packet-oriented transmis- sions by proposing very-low-complexity algorithms for car- rier Doppler-shift and Doppler-rate estimation. A network comprising satellite and high-altitude plat- forms is considered in the paper “TCP-call admission con- trol interaction in multiplatform space architectures.” Cross- layer techniques are implemented by means of TCP feeding back into call admission control (CAC) procedures for the purpose of prevention of congestion and improvement in QoS. Finally, since navigation is an extremely important part of the satellite system family, we have included two papers. The first paper “Efficient delay tracking methods with side- lobes cancellation for BOC-modulated signals” deals with bi- nary offset carrier (BOC) modulation, which is adopted in typical navigation systems. The paper considers how to im- prove the tracking of the main lobe of the BOC-modulated signal by using sidelobe suppression techniques. An alterna- tive approach based on filter bank processing is presented in “Analysis of filter-bank-based methods for fast serial acqui- sition of BOC-modulated signals” to conclude the special is- sue.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
It has been a pleasure for us to have put together this spe- cial issue, which we hope you will find interesting. We would like to thank the editorial staff at Hindawi for their sup- port and assistance during the preparation of this special is- sue. We would like to thank the contributing authors for the excellent quality of their submissions and our SatNEx col- leagues for their valuable assistance in the reviewing of pa- pers. SatNEx is partially funded by the European Commis- sion under the Sixth Framework Programme. Further in- formation on SatNEx can be found on the project web site: http://www.satnex.org/.
Ray E. Sheriff Anton Donner Alessandro Vanelli-Coralli Hindawi Publishing Corporation EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking Volume 2007, Article ID 59608, 11 pages doi:10.1155/2007/59608
Research Article Multi-Satellite MIMO Communications at Ku-Band and Above: Investigations on Spatial Multiplexing for Capacity Improvement and Selection Diversity for Interference Mitigation
Konstantinos P.Liolis, Athanasios D. Panagopoulos, and Panayotis G. Cottis
Wireless & Satellite Communications Group, School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, National Technical University of Athens (NTUA), 9 Iroon Polytechniou Street, Zografou, Athens 15780, Greece Received 28 August 2006; Revised 2 March 2007; Accepted 13 May 2007
Recommended by Alessandro Vanelli-Coralli
This paper investigates the applicability of multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) technology to satellite communications at the Ku-band and above. After introducing the possible diversity sources to form a MIMO matrix channel in a satellite environment, particular emphasis is put on satellite diversity. Two specific different topics from the field of MIMO technology applications to satellite communications at these frequencies are further analyzed: (i) capacity improvement achieved by MIMO spatial multi- plexing systems and (ii) interference mitigation achieved by MIMO diversity systems employing receive antenna selection. In the first case, a single-user capacity analysis of a satellite 2 × 2 MIMO spatial multiplexing system is presented and a useful analytical closed form expression is derived for the outage capacity achieved. In the second case, a satellite 2 × 2 MIMO diversity system with receive antenna selection is considered, adjacent satellite cochannel interference on its forward link is studied and an analytical model predicting the interference mitigation achieved is presented. In both cases, an appropriate physical MIMO channel model is assumed which takes into account the propagation phenomena related to the frequencies of interest, such as clear line-of-sight op- eration, high antenna directivity, the effect of rain fading, and the slant path lengths difference. Useful numerical results obtained through the analytical expressions derived are presented to compare the performance of multi-satellite MIMO systems to relevant single-input single-output (SISO) ones.
Copyright © 2007 Konstantinos P. Liolis et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. INTRODUCTION MIMO both as a research topic and as a commercially viable technology in terrestrial communications [1, 2]. Multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) technology has re- The appealing gains obtained by MIMO techniques in cently emerged as one of the most significant technical terrestrial networks generate a further interest in investigat- breakthroughs in modern digital communications due to its ing the possibility of applying the same principle in satel- promise of very high data rates at no cost of extra spectrum lite networks, as well. However, the underlying differences and transmit power [1, 2]. Wireless communication can be between the terrestrial and the satellite channels make such benefited from MIMO signaling in two different ways: spa- applicability a non straightforward matter and, therefore, a tial multiplexing and diversity. In the former case, indepen- rather challenging subject. In this case, one of the funda- dent data is transmitted from separate antennas, and aiming mental problems is the difficulty of generating a completely at maximizing throughput (i.e., linear capacity growth with independent fading profile over the space segment. In satel- the number of antennas can be achieved). In the latter case, lite communications, due to the huge free space losses along the same signal is transmitted along multiple (ideally) inde- the earth-space link, line-of-sight (LOS) operation is usually pendently fading paths aiming at improving the robustness deemed a practical necessity. However, this is not the typ- of the link in terms of each user BER performance. These ical case in terrestrial communications where rich scatter- advantages have been largely responsible for the success of ing and non-LOS environments with multipath propagation 2 EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking are encountered. Thus, placing multiple antennas on a sin- antennas (see, e.g., [11]) which allow for compact MIMO gle satellite does not seem a suitable choice in order to ex- setups. It has already been examined as a promising solu- ploit the MIMO channel capabilities. In fact, the absence of tion to shape MIMO channels in S-band land mobile satellite scatterers in the vicinity of the satellite leads to an inherent communications [7, 12–16]. Its main advantage over satellite rank deficiency of the MIMO channel matrix. Therefore, at a diversity is the elimination of any additional cost associated first glance, the applicability of MIMO technology to satellite with the utilization of multiple satellites. It also bypasses the channels does not seem well justified. asynchronism problem associated with the distributed na- The objective of this paper is in line with some other re- ture of satellite diversity. However, it can be disadvantageous cent research efforts [4–8, 12–16] casting further light in this to satellite diversity especially in satellite networks operating regard. These studies have been mainly concerned with the at high-frequency bands (i.e., Ku, Ka, and Q/V), which are possible diversity sources that can be exploited in satellite affected by the highly correlated rainfall medium and, also, communications to form a MIMO matrix channel. A cate- in case of large blockages resulting in hard system failures gorization of these diversity sources follows. (i.e., on/off channel phenomena). Moreover, as concluded in (i) Site diversity, where multiple cooperating terminal [13], polarization diversity can only increase the transmis- stations (TSs), sufficiently separated from each other, are in sion rate of a satellite communication system by a factor of communication with a single satellite. So far, it has only been two, whereas in multi-satellite systems, satellite diversity can studied as an efficient rain fade mitigation technique at the result in m-fold capacity increase, where m is the number of Ku (12/14 GHz), Ka (20/30 GHz), and Q/V (40/50 GHz) fre- satellites occupied. quency bands because of its very low achievable spatial cor- This paper focuses particularly on dual-satellite MIMO relation due to rain [3]. However, due to the enormous slant communication systems employing satellite diversity. More- path lengths associated, the required separation distance be- over, emphasis is put on the less congested high-frequency tween the multiple TSs to ensure ideally independent fading bands, such as Ku and above. At these frequencies, multi- profile is of the order of several km, which rather hinders its path propagation is insignificant. However, by virtue of satel- practical interest in MIMO applications. lite diversity, MIMO can be considered to effectively exploit × (ii) Satellite (or orbital) diversity, where multiple satel- the rainfall spatial inhomogeneity instead. A physical 2 2 lites, sufficiently separated in orbit to provide (ideally) in- MIMO satellite channel model is assumed taking into ac- dependently fading channels, communicate with a single TS count the relevant propagation phenomena, such as clear equipped with either multiple antennas or even a single mul- LOS operation, high antenna directivity, rain fading, and tiple-input antenna. So far, it has been studied mostly as an rainfall spatial inhomogeneity [3, 17]. This model is flexi- efficient rain fade mitigation technique in Ku-, Ka-, and Q/V- ble and can be applied on a global scale since it has physical band satellite communications [3] and, also, recently, as a inputs obtained by regression fitting analysis on the ITU-R candidate to form satellite MIMO matrix channels at high rainmaps [18] and is based on general assumptions about (i.e., Ku, Ka, and Q/V) [4, 5]aswellasatlowfrequency the rain process [17]. Moreover, it incorporates the general bands, such as L (1/2 GHz) and S (2/4 GHz) [6–8]. Also, it case of an ordered MIMO satellite channel (due to the slant is worthwhile noting that it is already successfully employed path lengths difference). To this end, the resulting propaga- in the continental US digital audio radio services (DARS), tion delay offset is assumed to be properly taken into account mobile systems, Sirius and XM satellite radio, operating at at the TS receiver. A possible practical solution to this prob- the S-band [9]. Satellite diversity provides a rather practical lem might be the one implemented in [5] according to which solution of reasonable complexity since the multiple received matched filters are first applied to the received signals for the signals at the single TS can easily be combined due to the detection of the propagation delay offset, which is then fed to colocation of the antennas. However, an inherent problem a timing aligner. Subsequently, the proposed timing aligner of this scheme, apart from the costly utilization of multiple eliminates the delay offset by adjusting the timing of a signal satellites, is the asynchronism of the multiple transmitted sig- parallel-to-serial converter. The study of more efficient solu- nals at the TS receiver, which comes as a result of the prop- tions to the asynchronism problem associated with satellite agation delay difference due to the wide separation between diversity, although rather challenging, is out of the scope of the satellites. A similar problem is dealt with and solutions this paper and will be the subject of a future work. are proposed in several papers mainly concerning distributed In the first part of this work, emphasis is put on a satellite sensor networks, such as in [10]. To the authors’ knowledge, 2 × 2MIMOspatial multiplexing system and on its possi- for the more complicated satellite case—due to the much ble capacity improvement with respect to the relevant SISO larger and variable delay difference—the only relevant solu- system. The term “spatial multiplexing” refers to the trans- tion proposed so far is reported in [5]. mission of independent data streams from the multiple sep- (iii) Polarization diversity, where a single dual-orthogonal arate satellites [1, 2]. Well-known results obtained from the polarized satellite communicates with a single TS equipped MIMO literature [19, 20] are applied here for the capacity with a dual-orthogonal polarized antenna. Its principle is analysis of such a 2 × 2MIMOsystem.Thefigureofmerit based on the polarization sensitivity of the reflection and used to characterize the resulting MIMO fading channel is diffraction processes, which causes random signal fading at the outage capacity [1], for which an analytical closed form the TS receiver. It represents a solution of rather practical expression is provided. Note that such analytical expressions interest due to the recent developments in MIMO compact are extremely hard to obtain even in the well-established field Konstantinos P. Liolis et al. 3
S1 S2
T S2 To S1 o
d1, AR1 d2, AR2
Δθ
ϕ2 ϕ1
TS TS (a) (b)
Figure 1: (a) Configuration of a dual-satellite 2 × 2 MIMO channel. Individual satellites S1 and S2 transmit either independent data streams (MIMO spatial multiplexing system, Section 3) or the same signal over the multiple (ideally) independently fading paths (MIMO diversity system, Section 4), (b) associated elevation angles.
of MIMO theory due to the intractability of the outage ca- analysis for the possible interference mitigation achieved by a pacity distribution [2]. satellite 2×2 MIMO diversity system with receive antenna se- In the second part, a satellite 2 × 2MIMOdiversity sys- lection is presented in Section 4. Useful numerical results ob- tem employing receive antenna selection is examined, and tained for both the above satellite MIMO applications con- issues specifically related to cochannel interference (CCI) are sidered are provided in Section 5. Section 6 concludes the addressed from a propagation point of view. The term “di- paper. versity” refers to the transmission of the same signal over the multiple (ideally) independently fading paths [1, 2]. Receive antenna selection is a low-cost, low-complexity approach to 2. MIMO SATELLITE CHANNEL MODEL benefit from many of the advantages of MIMO technology while, at the same time, bypassing the multiple RF chains Figure 1 depicts the configuration of a dual-satellite MIMO associated with multiple antennas at the receiver, which are communication channel at the Ku-band and above. The TS costly in terms of size, power, and hardware [21]. The inter- is equipped with two colocated highly directive antennas and ference analysis presented here is quite different from con- communicates with two satellites, S1 and S2, subtending an Δ ventional communication-oriented approaches followed in angle θ to the TS, large enough that the spatial correlation standard MIMO theory [1]. Attention is paid to the CCI due to rain along the relevant slant paths is as low as possible. problems arising on the forward link of such a 2 × 2MIMO The normalized radiation pattern of each TS antenna, de- · satellite system due to differential rain attenuation from an noted by GR( ), is compatible with the ITU-R specifications 2 adjacent satellite [22]. To deal with the statistical behaviour [25] and is shown in Figure 2. The lengths of slant paths = of the signal-to-interference ratio (SIR) introduced by the Si-TS are denoted by di (i 1, 2) and the random variables rainfall spatial inhomogeneity, the concept of unacceptable (RVs) associated with the respective rain induced attenua- = interference probability1 [23, 24] is employed here. An ana- tions (in dB) are denoted by ARi (i 1, 2). In general, the ff lytical prediction model concerning the interference mitiga- two slant paths Si-TShavedi erent elevation angles denoted = tion achieved by the proposed satellite 2 × 2MIMOdiversity by φi (i 1, 2), respectively. system is provided. Assuming that clear LOS between the TS and each satel- The rest of the paper is organized as follows. Section 2 lite Si exists, that each TS antenna is at boresight with the = presents the channel model adopted for MIMO satellite com- corresponding satellite Si (i 1, 2) and that rain attenuation munications at the Ku-band and above. Section 3 provides a is the major fading mechanism, the path gain for each Si-TS communication-based capacity analysis for a satellite 2 × 2 link is modeled as MIMO spatial multiplexing system. A propagation-oriented ◦ − − ∝ · 2 · ARi/10 = gi GR 0 di 10 (i 1, 2). (1) 1 Note that the concept of the “unacceptable interference probability (UIP)” in this paper is exactly the same as that of the “acceptable interfer- ence probability (AIP)” employed in [23, 24]. Their only difference con- 2 Note that the analyses presented hereafter are quite general and, therefore, cerns their nomenclature. may incorporate other TS antenna radiation patterns, as well. 4 EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking
0 1 12 − ρ 5 0.9 (dB)
R −10 G 0.8 −15 0.7 cient due to rain,
−20 ffi 0.6 −25 0.5 −30
0.4 TS antenna normalized gain, −35 Spatial correlation coe −40 0.3 −100 −80 −60 −40 −200 20406080100 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 Off-axis angle (deg) Angular separation, Δθ (deg)
Figure 2: Normalized radiation pattern of each TS antenna com- Figure 3: Spatial correlation coefficient due to rain ρ12 versus an- patible with ITU-R specifications [25]. gular separation Δθ for a dual-satellite MIMO channel operating in ◦ Atlanta, GA, at the Ka-band with satellite elevation angles φ1 = 45 ◦ and φ2 = 40 .
Hence, the total path loss along each Si-TS link (in dB) is A = FSL + A (i = 1, 2), (2) i i Ri (i = 1, 2). Finally, the assumption of independent identically = 2 distributed (i.i.d) elements of H, often made in conventional where FSLi 10 log10(4πdi f/c) is the free space loss along each link, c the speed of light, and f the operating fre- terrestrial MIMO systems, cannot be made here, since there quency. Note that the fundamental assumptions concerning is a relatively high spatial correlation due to rain. the modeling of the rain attenuation RVs ARi (i = 1, 2) are the same as those analytically presented in [17]. The convec- 3. SATELLITE MIMO SPATIAL MULTIPLEXING SYSTEM: tive raincell model employing Crane’s assumptions is used CAPACITY ANALYSIS for the description of the vertical variation of the rainfall structure [17]. Based on this assumption, if Δθ is sufficiently In this Section, the two satellites Si (i = 1, 2) depicted in ff large, the spatial correlation coefficient between the RVs ARi Figure 1 are assumed to transmit di erent and independent is relatively low and, thus, an (ideally) decorrelated MIMO data streams (i.e., spatial multiplexing is investigated). The satellite channel is possible. To this end, an illustrative quan- channel H is considered perfectly known to the TS receiver titative example is presented in Figure 3, which depicts the (via training and tracking), while at the transmit side, both spatial correlation coefficient due to rain ρ12 versus Δθ for a satellites are assumed to have no channel knowledge. In the dual-satellite MIMO channel operating in Atlanta, GA, USA absence of channel state information (CSI) at the transmit ◦ at the Ka-band with satellite elevation angles φ1 = 45 and side, equal power allocation to the two satellites is a reason- ◦ φ2 = 40 . able and rather practical choice, due to the distributed na- Based on the above and, also, assuming frequency nonse- ture of the system. Therefore, from the standard MIMO the- lective fading, the resulting MIMO channel matrix H is given ory, the following well-known formula for the capacity (in by bps/Hz) of MIMO channels is adopted [19, 20]:
= h11 h12 2 H = PT H = PT h21 h22 C log2 det I2 + HH log2 1+ λi , ⎡ ⎤ 2N0 i=1 2N0 √ j2πd1 f (3) ⎢ g1 exp 0 ⎥ (4) ⎢ c ⎥ = ⎣ ⎦ . √ j2πd2 f 0 g2 exp where I2 is the 2 × 2 identity matrix, PT the total average c 3 power available at the transmit side, N0 the noise spectral The diagonal structure of H is due to the high directivity of the TS antennas and the large value of Δθ.InMIMOter- 3 minology, channels with diagonal H matrix are known as Note that PT is the sum transmit power of all transmitting satellites Si re- parallel MIMO channels. Further details about such chan- gardless of their number. This means that in both the dual-satellite MIMO nels can be found in [26]. Moreover, as opposed to standard case and the single satellite SISO case, the total available transmit power is constant and equal to PT . This is ensured employing the normalization MIMO theory [1, 2], H is not normalized here (i.e., ordered factor “2” in (4),whichallowsforafaircomparisonbetweentherelevant MIMO channel) due to the different slant path lengths di MIMO and SISO cases. Konstantinos P. Liolis et al. 5
= = density at the TS receiver input, and λi (i 1, 2) the positive The quantities AmRi , SaRi (i 1, 2), encountered in (8)–(11), H H eigenvalues of the matrix HH (the superscript stands for are the statistical parameters of the lognormal RVs ARi (i = conjugate transposition). 1, 2) given by [17] Taking into account the channel modeling assumptions, (4)iswrittenas 2 = Hi 2 2 − = SaRi ln 1+ 2 exp b Sr 1 (i 1, 2), LDi 2 (12) − 2 2 − 2 = ARi/10 b Sr Sa C log2 1+0.5SNRCSi10 ,(5) = b Ri = AmRi aRmLDi exp (i 1, 2), i=1 2 = where SNRCSi (i 1, 2) are the nominal SNR values under where LDi (i = 1, 2) are the projections of the effective path clear sky conditions. Based on the path gain model given in lengths Li (i = 1, 2) [17] on the earth surface, Hi (i = 1, 2) are (1), the SNRCSi values (in dB) are related through spatial parameters related to each path of length LDi (i = 1, 2) which may be found in [17], and a, b are constants depend- − = d2 SNRCS1 SNRCS2 20 log10 . (6) ing on the operating frequency f , the polarization tilt angle, d1 the temperature, and the rainfall characteristics over the ser- Equation (5) provides an expression for the instantaneous viced area. Rm, Sr are the lognormal statistical parameters of capacity of a deterministic 2 × 2 MIMO channel H.How- the rainfall rate R (in mm/hr). A reliable database of rainfall ever, since the rainfall introduces slow fading and stochastic statistics for any geographical location on earth is provided behaviour over the channel H, the appropriate statistic mea- by ITU-R in [18] and is used throughout the present work as sure to characterize the resulting fading channel is the outage an input to the simulations performed in order to determine capacity defined by [1] the values of Rm, Sr . P C ≤ C = q,(7) out,q 4. SATELLITE MIMO DIVERSITY SYSTEM where Cout,q is the information rate guaranteed for (1− WITH RECEIVE ANTENNA SELECTION: q)100% of the channel realizations. INTERFERENCE ANALYSIS Consider the RV transformation In this section, the two satellites S (i = 1, 2) depicted in − i ln ARi ln AmRi ui = (i = 1, 2) (8) Figure 1 are assumed to transmit the same signal over the SaRi (ideally) independently fading paths Si-TS (i = 1, 2) (i.e., di- versity is investigated). To alleviate the high cost and com- which relates the lognormal rain attenuation RVs ARi (i = plexity associated with multiple RF chains, the dual-antenna 1, 2) to the normalized normal RVs ui (i = 1, 2). Substituting (5) into (7) and after some straightforward algebra, the fol- TS receiver is equipped with only one RF chain and performs × lowing analytical closed form expression for the outage ca- antenna selection, that is, the 2 2 MIMO satellite system pacity is obtained: assumed employs receive selection diversity [21]. Therefore, the TS receiver detects the signal related to the path with the P C ≤ Cout,q highest SNR. Under the constraint of only one RF chain at +∞ − the receiver, in order to know all SNRs simultaneously for = 1 uB ρn12u1 = du1 fU1 u1 erfc q, optimal selection, a training signal in a preamble to the trans- 2 u − 2 A 2 1 ρn12 mitted data is assumed. During this preamble, the TS receiver (9) scans the two antennas, finds that one with the highest SNR, and selects it for reception of the next data burst. Thus, only where erfc(·) is the complementary error function, f (u ) U1 1 a few more training bits are required instead of additional RF the probability density function (pdf) of the normal distri- chains. bution, ρ the logarithmic correlation coefficient between n12 Particular emphasis is put on possible interference mit- the normal RVs u (i = 1, 2) [17]andu , u are analytically i A B igation offered by the proposed satellite 2 × 2 MIMO di- given by versity system. In this regard, a propagation-based analy- ff = − Cout,q − sisisperformedwhichisquitedi erent from conventional uA ln 10 log10 0.5SNRCS2 10 log10 2 1 communication-oriented approaches followed in standard − ff ln AmR2 SaR2 , MIMO theory [1]. Specifically, the e ect of rainfall on the interference analysis is taken into account and the differential rain attenuation related to an adjacent satellite is considered (10) as the dominant cause of the SIR degradation [22]. Such an = interference problem is further aggravated due to the spa- uB ln 10 log10 0.5SNRCS1 tial inhomogeneity of the rainfall medium. It constitutes a −Am exp(u1Sa )/10 +10log 1+0.5SNRCS210 R2 R2 10 typical interference scenario, especially over congested urban − − Cout,q − − AmR2 exp(u1SaR2 )/10 areas, where the increased demand for link capacity and ra- 10 log10 2 1 0.5SNRCS210 dio coverage imposes the coexistence of many satellite radio − ln AmR1 SaR1 . links over the same geographical and spectral area. In the fol- (11) lowing, an analytical prediction model is presented, which 6 EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking
S1 S3 S2
To S3 To S2 To S1
d3, AR3 d1, AR1 d2, AR2
Δψ Δθ
ϕ3 ϕ2 ϕ1
TS TS (a) (b)
Figure 4: (a) Configuration of the satellite 2 × 2 MIMO diversity system assumed and the interference scenario on its forward link, (b) associated elevation angles. quantifies the adjacent satellite CCI mitigation achieved by is true. Assuming that the proposed 2 × 2 MIMO system with respect to the corre- Ω = = sponding SISO one. i Ai