Word count 18,107 Eugenics in British Economics from Marshall to Meade John Aldrich Economics Department University of Southampton Southampton SO17 1BJ UK e-mail:
[email protected] Abstract From the late nineteenth century until well into the twentieth the inherited quality of the population was a consideration for British social reformers, including economists. This paper describes the economists’ involvement focussing on six individuals, Edgeworth, Marshall, Pigou, Keynes, Harrod and Meade, two anxieties, the increasing weight of the “unfit” in the population at home and the declining weight of the British in the world, and two policy areas, the treatment of the “feeble-minded” and the “endowment of motherhood.” March 2019 1 Introduction In 1911 Alfred Marshall was “hugely delighted” at the formation of the University of Cambridge Eugenics Society, audiences of two or three hundred attended the Society’s public lectures while the Mental Deficiency Act of 1913 seemed to be turning eugenic thinking into law. Eugenics was not confined to a moment before the Great War, however: half a century on a later occupant of the Cambridge chair, James Meade, declared himself “a radical in politics but a believer in Eugenics.” In Meade’s time, however, after the Second World War and the Nazi exterminations, eugenics was more likely to be consigned to the “lunatic fringe of biology” (Hogben (1963: 68)). The qualities humans inherit, physical or intellectual, were never of such central importance for economists as for biologists, demographers or psychologists, the students of propagation and the qualities propagated, but some economists took an interest in those qualities and in improving them.