Feeding Requirements of Gallinaceous Upland Game

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Feeding Requirements of Gallinaceous Upland Game FEEDING REQUIREMENTS OF GALLINACEOUS UPLAND GAME BIRDS by Ralph B. Nestler ^ W Í T H an awakened public interest in the preservation of wild life, more and more farmers, 4-H Club members, and others are raising upland game birds. Also, more attention is being given to the right kind of feeding practices. This article discusses the feeding of these birds in the wild and in captivity. THE iMPOiiTAxcE of a knowledge of gamo nutrition and satisfactory feeding practices is gradually being impressed upon game managers and others interested in ^-ame tliroughout the country. For more than half a century civilization lias been forcing game almost to exthiction. One notable example is the complete destruction of the heath hen, or eastern pinnated grouse. At one time this bird was found in large numbers in Massachusetts, southern New Hampshire, Xew^ York, Pennsylvania, and New Jersey. Its last stand w^as on the island of Martha^s Vineyard, Mass., where it existed for man^^ years after its extinction in oth.er sections of the comitry. In 1930, only one bird of this species could be found there. In recent years, certain foresighted citizens have realized the need of help for wildlife. Through their efforts game refuges have been started, feeding grounds are prepared especially for the game, and artificial game propagation has become a business. The work of game preservation and replenishment by both State game commissions and private individuals has made such strides in recent years that it has passed the trial-and-error stage and reached the field of scientific research. This article attempts to sliow^ wdiat has been done in the field of nutrition and feeding of gallinaceous upland game birds and what still remains to be done. Because much of the w^ork on game to date has pertained to these species and because of space limitations, other kinds of game, including game mammals, marsh and aquatic game birds, pigeons, and doves, are not here considered. -' Ralph B. Nestler ii? Associate Biologist, Bureau of Biological Survey. Appreciation is expressed to H. W. Titus, in charge of Poultry Nutrition Investigations, Bureau of Animal Industry, and Arnold Xel- '^on, Section of Food Habits, Bureau of Biological Survey, for their helpful suggestions, assistance, and constructive eritieisni of this article. (The Bureau of Biological Survey was transferred from the Depart- ment of Agriculture to the Department of the Interior July 1,1939.) 893 894 YEARBOOK OF AGRICULTURE, 1939 THE UPLAND GAME BIRDS Gallinaceous upland game birds belong to tbe superfamily Phasia- noidea, of the order Galliformes. This superfamil}^ is di\dded into four groups—(1) grouse, ptarmigans, and the sage hen (the Tetraoni- dae family); (2) American quails and Old World partridges (the Perdi- cidae family) ; (3) pheasants (the Phasianidae family) ; and (4) turkeys (the Meleagrididae family). The 13 most important species in continental United States on which some work has been done in captivity are ruffed grouse, sharp-tailed grouse, prairie chicken or pinnated grouse, sage hen, bobwhite quail, mountain or plumed quail, California or helmet quail, GambePs quail, scaled quail, Hun- garian partridge, chukar partridge, ring-necked pheasant, and wild turkey.^ Until very recently, only the bobwhite quail, the ring- necked pheasant, the Hungarian partridge, and the wild turkey have been propagated successful^ in captivity to any great extent. Other species of quail also are now being raised in this wa^^ with success. GROUSE Of the Tetraonidae family, the ruffed grouse, commonly called partridge in New England and pheasant in the southern AUeghan}^ States, is probably the best known generally, and is one of our most esteemed native game birds. This species ranges from the Atlantic to the Pacific and from Canada to the higher ground of the Southern States. In 1884-85, Pierre Lorillard turned ruffed grouse loose on the game reserve at Jobstown, N. J., with satisfactory results. Suc- cessful implantations were made in 1900 on a 1,500-acre tract on Washington Island, Wis., by William Barnhard. Birds shipped from Alberta, Canada, to an island in Puget Sound, Wash., in 1923, have also done very well. Game propagators have found that the proper care of ruffed grouse in pens is very difficult, induit native birds usualW are too wild for controlled conditions. On the other hand, propagated stock brought to maturity is usually too tame for planting in the wild. The sharp-tailed grouse is not so familiar to most people as the ruffed grouse, and it has not received as much attention from the game propagators. It is found in eastern Colorado, central Nebraska, eastern South Dakota, Minnesota, Utah, northern New Mexico, and western Wisconsin. Changes in the center of the prairie chicken population as related to human settlement of this country are still in process. This bird formerly ranged throughout all the open country between the Appa- lachian and the Rocky Mountains and from Canada to the Gulf coast. As the country became more thickly populated, the prairie chicken has disappeared from man\^ regions, and the eastern limit of its range has moved westward. At the same time, the clearing of forests has provided much new open country that it lias been prompt to occupy. In this way, its range has extended westward and north- ward, and at the same time has been curtailed eastward. It is a ^ The scientific names of these species are Bonasa umbelius (ruiîed grouse), Pedioecetes phasianeUus (sharp tailed grouse), Tympanuchus cupido (prairie chicken or pinnated grouse), Centrocercus uropkasiajius (sage hen), Colinusvirginianus{\iohv7hit^<l\i2L\\), Oreortyxpicta (mountainor pUiniedquail), Lophortyxcalifornicus (California or helmet quail), Lophortyx gambeii (Gambel's quail), Callipepla squamata (scaled quail), Perdix perdix (Hungarian partridge), Alectoris graeca chukar (chukar partridge), Phasianus colchicus tortnatus (ring-necked pheasant), and Meleagris gailopavo (wild turkey). UPLAND GAME BIRDS 895 gregarioTîs bird and is easily domesticated, but it has not been pj'Oj>a- gated successfully in captivity. The sage hen is found in the sagebrush plains of the Transition Zone from northwestern North Dakota to central California, north- western New Mexico, and northw^estern Nebraska. It has not been raised successfully in captivity. QUAILS AND PARTRIDGES The very popular bobwhite is more widely distributed in the United States than any other species of the Perdicidae family. In the North it is commonly called quail, whereas in the Soutliern States it is generally designated partridge. It is very abundant and is the principal upland game bird of tlie Gulf and South Atlantic States. It ranges westward to the elevated central Plains from South Dakota to Texas. The distribution of the bobwhite in tlie Northeast is more restricted now than it was about 50 years ago, and the present stock seems unable to occupy the colder regions of the New England States, where at one time the bird lived success- fully. This withdraw^al of bobwhite from the cold interior of the Northeast to the warmer coastal belt probably goes hand in hand with the decline of agriculture in New England and a nearly complete failure of the winter food supply. Introduction of the bobwhite into Washington, Colorado, and Montana w^cst of the Divide has met with moderate success, but implantations in California, Arizona, New Mexico, Utah, Wvoming, South. Dakota, and Minnesota have failed. Bobwhite are amenable to large-scale I'earing in captivity. ^ William Coleman of Virginia pioneered in the development of techniques and electrical equipment for successful quail propagation, and in 1929 succeeded in raising very large numbers of birds successfully with electric incubators and brooders. Only a few years prior to this, all hatching and rearing had been done with bantam hens. The various other American quail, such as the mountain quail, the California quail, and GambeTs quail, also may be raised in captivity. Their eggs may be incubated successfully luider bantam hens, and for some species electrical incubation has been tried. The mountain or plumed quail is confined to the momitainous sections of the Pacific Coast States; the California or helmet quail likewise is^ localized more or less on the west coast; and GambeFs quail inhabits Texas, Arizona, and New^ Mexico, from which it is rapidty spreading to sur- rounding States, especially California and Nevada. The scaled quail, known also as the white topknot and the blue quail, is one of the most interesting game birds of the Southwestern States. It is found in abundance locally and ranges through New Mexico and xirizona to Colorado, Oklahoma, west Texas, and Kansas. The European or Hungarian partridge was introduced into this country by Kichard Bache in the latter part of the eighteenth cen- tury, when he stocked his plantation near Beverly, N. J. Subsequent plantings were made in Virginia and other parts of New Jersey. In 1904, this exotic bird was planted in North Carolina and did moderately well for a time on breeding grounds planted to cowpeas. The next year a wave of importation began along the entire Atlantic 896 YEARBOOK OF AGRICULTURE, 1939 coast. Importations were made in Connecticut, Pennsylvania, and New Jersey, on a very large scale. For a while the residts were encouraging, but by 1920 practically all the birds had disappeared. Recent attempts to implant this species in the North Central States have met with varying success. It seems, however, that the Hun- garian partridge has a good chance of becoming established in the grain-producing section of the Midwest. The chukar partridge has a number of other names, derived mainly from its loud double call—^*kau-kau/^ '^keklik,^^ '^Indian chukor,'' ^^chickore,^^ ^'chukar red-legged partridge/' '^chuchare/' and ^^chukru." The chukar is a native of India, but it is found also in large numbers in north China, from which place it has been imported to this country.
Recommended publications
  • Sage-Grouse Hunting Season
    CHAPTER 11 UPLAND GAME BIRD AND SMALL GAME HUNTING SEASONS Section 1. Authority. This regulation is promulgated by authority of Wyoming Statutes § 23-1-302 and § 23-2-105 (d). Section 2. Hunting Regulations. (a) Bag and Possession Limit. Only one (1) daily bag limit of each species of upland game birds and small game may be taken per day regardless of the number of hunt areas hunted in a single day. When hunting more than one (1) hunt area, a person’s daily and possession limits shall be equal to, but shall not exceed, the largest daily and possession limit prescribed for any one (1) of the specified hunt areas in which the hunting and possession occurs. (b) Evidence of sex and species shall remain naturally attached to the carcass of any upland game bird in the field and during transportation. For pheasant, this shall include the feathered head, feathered wing or foot. For all other upland game bird species, this shall include one fully feathered wing. (c) No person shall possess or use shot other than nontoxic shot for hunting game birds and small game with a shotgun on the Commission’s Table Mountain and Springer wildlife habitat management areas and on all national wildlife refuges open for hunting. (d) Required Clothing. Any person hunting pheasants within the boundaries of any Wyoming Game and Fish Commission Wildlife Habitat Management Area, or on Bureau of Reclamation Withdrawal lands bordering and including Glendo State Park, shall wear in a visible manner at least one (1) outer garment of fluorescent orange or fluorescent pink color which shall include a hat, shirt, jacket, coat, vest or sweater.
    [Show full text]
  • Hunting and Game Preservation Act
    HUNTING AND GAME PRESERVATION ACT Prom. SG. 78/26 Sep 2000, amend. SG. 26/20 Mar 2001, amend. SG. 77/9 Aug 2002, amend. SG. 79/16 Aug 2002, amend. SG. 88/4 Nov 2005, amend. SG. 82/10 Oct 2006, amend. SG. 108/29 Dec 2006, amend. SG. 64/7 Aug 2007, amend. SG. 43/29 Apr 2008, amend. SG. 67/29 Jul 2008, amend. SG. 69/5 Aug 2008, amend. SG. 91/21 Oct 2008, amend. SG. 6/23 Jan 2009, amend. SG. 80/9 Oct 2009, amend. SG. 92/20 Nov 2009, amend. SG. 73/17 Sep 2010, amend. SG. 89/12 Nov 2010, amend. SG. 8/25 Jan 2011, amend. SG. 19/8 Mar 2011, amend. SG. 39/20 May 2011, amend. SG. 77/4 Oct 2011, amend. SG. 38/18 May 2012, amend. SG. 60/7 Aug 2012, amend. SG. 77/9 Oct 2012, amend. SG. 102/21 Dec 2012, amend. SG. 15/15 Feb 2013, amend. SG. 62/12 Jul 2013, amend. SG. 60/7 Aug 2015, amend. SG. 14/19 Feb 2016, amend. SG. 58/18 Jul 2017, amend. SG. 63/4 Aug 2017, amend. and suppl. SG. 17/23 Feb 2018, suppl. SG. 61/24 Jul 2018, suppl. SG. 77/18 Sep 2018, amend. and suppl. SG. 37/7 May 2019, amend. and suppl. SG. 74/20 Sep 2019 Chapter one. GENERAL PROVISIONS Art. 1. The Act shall provide the relations connected with the ownership, preservation and management of the game, the organisation of hunting economy, the right to hunt and the trade with game and game products.
    [Show full text]
  • Health Risk Assessment for the Introduction of Eastern Wild Turkeys (Meleagris Gallopavo Silvestris) Into Nova Scotia
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Canadian Cooperative Wildlife Health Centre: Wildlife Damage Management, Internet Center Newsletters & Publications for April 2004 Health risk assessment for the introduction of Eastern wild turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo silvestris) into Nova Scotia A.S. Neimanis F.A. Leighton Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/icwdmccwhcnews Part of the Environmental Sciences Commons Neimanis, A.S. and Leighton, F.A., "Health risk assessment for the introduction of Eastern wild turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo silvestris) into Nova Scotia" (2004). Canadian Cooperative Wildlife Health Centre: Newsletters & Publications. 48. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/icwdmccwhcnews/48 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Wildlife Damage Management, Internet Center for at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Canadian Cooperative Wildlife Health Centre: Newsletters & Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Health risk assessment for the introduction of Eastern wild turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo silvestris) into Nova Scotia A.S. Neimanis and F.A. Leighton 30 April 2004 Canadian Cooperative Wildlife Health Centre Department of Veterinary Pathology Western College of Veterinary Medicine 52 Campus Dr. University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon, SK Canada S7N 5B4 Tel: 306-966-7281 Fax: 306-966-7439 [email protected] [email protected] 1 SUMMARY This health risk assessment evaluates potential health risks associated with a proposed introduction of wild turkeys to the Annapolis Valley of Nova Scotia. The preferred source for the turkeys would be the Province of Ontario, but alternative sources include the northeastern United States from Minnesota eastward and Tennessee northward.
    [Show full text]
  • A Molecular Phylogeny of the Pheasants and Partridges Suggests That These Lineages Are Not Monophyletic R
    Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution Vol. 11, No. 1, February, pp. 38–54, 1999 Article ID mpev.1998.0562, available online at http://www.idealibrary.com on A Molecular Phylogeny of the Pheasants and Partridges Suggests That These Lineages Are Not Monophyletic R. T. Kimball,* E. L. Braun,*,† P. W. Zwartjes,* T. M. Crowe,‡,§ and J. D. Ligon* *Department of Biology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131; †National Center for Genome Resources, 1800 Old Pecos Trail, Santa Fe, New Mexico 87505; ‡Percy FitzPatrick Institute, University of Capetown, Rondebosch, 7700, South Africa; and §Department of Ornithology, American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West at 79th Street, New York, New York 10024-5192 Received October 8, 1997; revised June 2, 1998 World partridges are smaller and widely distributed in Cytochrome b and D-loop nucleotide sequences were Asia, Africa, and Europe. Most partridge species are used to study patterns of molecular evolution and monochromatic and primarily dull colored. None exhib- phylogenetic relationships between the pheasants and its the extreme or highly specialized ornamentation the partridges, which are thought to form two closely characteristic of the pheasants. related monophyletic galliform lineages. Our analyses Although the order Galliformes is well defined, taxo- used 34 complete cytochrome b and 22 partial D-loop nomic relationships are less clear within the group sequences from the hypervariable domain I of the (Verheyen, 1956), due to the low variability in anatomi- D-loop, representing 20 pheasant species (15 genera) and 12 partridge species (5 genera). We performed cal and osteological traits (Blanchard, 1857, cited in parsimony, maximum likelihood, and distance analy- Verheyen, 1956; Lowe, 1938; Delacour, 1977).
    [Show full text]
  • In Honor of Turkeys by John Morton
    Refuge Notebook • Vol. 17, No. 48 • November 27, 2015 In honor of turkeys by John Morton Simplified anatomy of the structural components used in bird flight. If you prefer eating white meat at Thanksgiving, you’re eating the turkey’s pectoralis and supracoracoideus muscles (credit: Wikipedia). Did you know that you were not alone yesterday By 1601, turkeys were so common in England in eating turkey? According to the National Turkey that Shakespeare wrote “contemplation makes a rare Federation, 95 percent of Americans eat turkey on turkey-cock of him: how he jets under his advanced Thanksgiving, consuming 675 million pounds from 45 plumes” in describing someone in the comedy Twelfth million birds. It certainly goes a long way towards ex- Night. The now fully domesticated turkey circled back plaining that gastric discomfort we experienced last to the New World when English and Dutch colonists night. Here are some facts you might not know about brought them to Virginia in the early seventeenth cen- the biology and history of turkeys. tury. Carl Linnaeus, despite being the father of the mod- Turkeys were originally domesticated for their ern taxonomic naming system, incorrectly named wild plumage, not their meat. While Aztecs did use turkeys turkeys Meleagris gallopavo because he thought they for meat and eggs, it was their feathers that were were related to the African guineafowl (Numida me- in demand for decoration. It wasn’t until the 1900s leagris). that turkeys were selectively bred for meat produc- Our domestic turkey did NOT originate from tion, specifically for big breasts and thighs.
    [Show full text]
  • The Wild Rabbit: Plague, Polices and Pestilence in England and Wales, 1931–1955
    The wild rabbit: plague, polices and pestilence in England and Wales, 1931–1955 by John Martin Abstract Since the eighteenth century the rabbit has occupied an ambivalent position in the countryside. Not only were they of sporting value but they were also valued for their meat and pelt. Attitudes to the rabbit altered though over the first half of the century, and this paper traces their redefinition as vermin. By the 1930s, it was appreciated that wild rabbits were Britain’s most serious vertebrate pest of cereal crops and grassland and that their numbers were having a significant effect on agricultural output. Government took steps to destroy rabbits from 1938 and launched campaigns against them during wartime, when rabbit was once again a form of meat. Thereafter government attitudes to the rabbit hardened, but it was not until the mid-1950s that pestilence in the form of a deadly virus, myxomatosis, precipitated an unprecedented decline in their population. The unprecedented decline in the European rabbit Oryctolagus( cuniculus) in the mid- twentieth century is one of the most remarkable ecological changes to have taken place in Britain. Following the introduction of myxomatosis into Britain in September 1953 at Bough Beech near Edenbridge in Kent, mortality rates in excess of 99.9 per cent were recorded in a number of affected areas.1 Indeed, in December 1954, the highly respected naturalist Robin Lockley speculated that 1955 would constitute ‘zero hour for the rabbit’, with numbers being lower by the end of the year than at any time since the eleventh century.2 In spite of the rapid increases in output and productivity which British agriculture experienced in the post-myxomatosis era, the importance of the disease as a causal factor in raising agricultural output has been largely ignored by agricultural historians.3 The academic neglect of the rabbit as a factor influencing productivity is even more apparent in respect of the pre-myxomatosis era, particularly the period before the Second World War.
    [Show full text]
  • Wild Turkey Education Guide
    Table of Contents Section 1: Eastern Wild Turkey Ecology 1. Eastern Wild Turkey Quick Facts………………………………………………...pg 2 2. Eastern Wild Turkey Fact Sheet………………………………………………….pg 4 3. Wild Turkey Lifecycle……………………………………………………………..pg 8 4. Eastern Wild Turkey Adaptations ………………………………………………pg 9 Section 2: Eastern Wild Turkey Management 1. Wild Turkey Management Timeline…………………….……………………….pg 18 2. History of Wild Turkey Management …………………...…..…………………..pg 19 3. Modern Wild Turkey Management in Maryland………...……………………..pg 22 4. Managing Wild Turkeys Today ……………………………………………….....pg 25 Section 3: Activity Lesson Plans 1. Activity: Growing Up WILD: Tasty Turkeys (Grades K-2)……………..….…..pg 33 2. Activity: Calling All Turkeys (Grades K-5)………………………………..…….pg 37 3. Activity: Fit for a Turkey (Grades 3-5)…………………………………………...pg 40 4. Activity: Project WILD adaptation: Too Many Turkeys (Grades K-5)…..…….pg 43 5. Activity: Project WILD: Quick, Frozen Critters (Grades 5-8).……………….…pg 47 6. Activity: Project WILD: Turkey Trouble (Grades 9-12………………….……....pg 51 7. Activity: Project WILD: Let’s Talk Turkey (Grades 9-12)..……………..………pg 58 Section 4: Additional Activities: 1. Wild Turkey Ecology Word Find………………………………………….…….pg 66 2. Wild Turkey Management Word Find………………………………………….pg 68 3. Turkey Coloring Sheet ..………………………………………………………….pg 70 4. Turkey Coloring Sheet ..………………………………………………………….pg 71 5. Turkey Color-by-Letter……………………………………..…………………….pg 72 6. Five Little Turkeys Song Sheet……. ………………………………………….…pg 73 7. Thankful Turkey…………………..…………………………………………….....pg 74 8. Graph-a-Turkey………………………………….…………………………….…..pg 75 9. Turkey Trouble Maze…………………………………………………………..….pg 76 10. What Animals Made These Tracks………………………………………….……pg 78 11. Drinking Straw Turkey Call Craft……………………………………….….……pg 80 Section 5: Wild Turkey PowerPoint Slide Notes The facilities and services of the Maryland Department of Natural Resources are available to all without regard to race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, age, national origin or physical or mental disability.
    [Show full text]
  • Than a Meal: the Turkey in History, Myth
    More Than a Meal Abigail at United Poultry Concerns’ Thanksgiving Party Saturday, November 22, 1997. Photo: Barbara Davidson, The Washington Times, 11/27/97 More Than a Meal The Turkey in History, Myth, Ritual, and Reality Karen Davis, Ph.D. Lantern Books New York A Division of Booklight Inc. Lantern Books One Union Square West, Suite 201 New York, NY 10003 Copyright © Karen Davis, Ph.D. 2001 All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the written permission of Lantern Books. Printed in the United States of America Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data For Boris, who “almost got to be The real turkey inside of me.” From Boris, by Terry Kleeman and Marie Gleason Anne Shirley, 16-year-old star of “Anne of Green Gables” (RKO-Radio) on Thanksgiving Day, 1934 Photo: Underwood & Underwood, © 1988 Underwood Photo Archives, Ltd., San Francisco Table of Contents 1 Acknowledgments . .9 Introduction: Milton, Doris, and Some “Turkeys” in Recent American History . .11 1. A History of Image Problems: The Turkey as a Mock Figure of Speech and Symbol of Failure . .17 2. The Turkey By Many Other Names: Confusing Nomenclature and Species Identification Surrounding the Native American Bird . .25 3. A True Original Native of America . .33 4. Our Token of Festive Joy . .51 5. Why Do We Hate This Celebrated Bird? . .73 6. Rituals of Spectacular Humiliation: An Attempt to Make a Pathetic Situation Seem Funny . .99 7 8 More Than a Meal 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Hunting Regulations
    WYOMING GAME AND FISH COMMISSION Upland Game Bird, Small Game, Migratory 2021 Game Bird and Wild Turkey Hunting Regulations Conservation Stamp Price Increase Effective July 1, 2021, the price for a 12-month conservation stamp is $21.50. A conservation stamp purchased on or before June 30, 2021 will be valid for 12 months from the date of purchase as indicated on the stamp. (See page 5) wgfd.wyo.gov Wyoming Hunting Regulations | 1 CONTENTS GENERAL 2021 License/Permit/Stamp Fees Access Yes Program ................................................................... 4 Carcass Coupons Dating and Display.................................... 4, 29 Pheasant Special Management Permit ............................................$15.50 Terms and Definitions .................................................................5 Resident Daily Game Bird/Small Game ............................................. $9.00 Department Contact Information ................................................ 3 Nonresident Daily Game Bird/Small Game .......................................$22.00 Important Hunting Information ................................................... 4 Resident 12 Month Game Bird/Small Game ...................................... $27.00 License/Permit/Stamp Fees ........................................................ 2 Nonresident 12 Month Game Bird/Small Game ..................................$74.00 Stop Poaching Program .............................................................. 2 Nonresident 12 Month Youth Game Bird/Small Game Wild Turkey
    [Show full text]
  • Attachment 3 Game Bird Program Staff Summary
    Attachment 3 GAME BIRD PROGRAM RECOMMENDATIONS FOR 2021–22 UPLAND and MIGRATORY GAME BIRD SEASONS FOR CONSIDERATION BY THE OREGON FISH AND WILDLIFE COMMISSION April 23, 2021 Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife 4034 Fairview Industrial Dr. SE Salem, OR 97302 Wildlife Division (503) 947-6301 Winner of 2021 Oregon Waterfowl Stamp Art Contest by Guy Crittenden featuring Cinnamon Teal pair TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents ..................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Figures.......................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Tables ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Upland Game Birds ................................................................................................................................................................. 4 Season Frameworks .......................................................................................................................................................... 4 Population Status and Harvest ...................................................................................................................................... 4 Upland Game Bird Season Proposals......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Migratory Waterfowl and Upland Hunting Seasons & Regulations Pamphlet Corrections Updated: December 19, 2017
    2017 MIGRATORY WATERFOWL AND UPLAND HUNTING SEASONS & REGULATIONS PAMPHLET CORRECTIONS UPDATED: DECEMBER 19, 2017 Page 8 (added December 19) In Goose Management Area 4, January 1, 2018 has been added to the list of legal hunt dates. Washington State Migratory Waterfowl & Upland Game Seasons 2017 Washington State Duck Stamp Program © Dee Dee Murry Effective June 1, 2017 to May 31, 2018 Message from WDFW New daily limits give goose hunters more options If you’re planning to hunt geese this season, you might want to pace yourself. Under new “multi-bag” limits approved by the Washington Fish and Wildlife Commission in April, hunters can take up to four Canada geese, six white geese and Dr. Jim Unsworth, Director 10 white-fronted geese a day. Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife That’s right. Hunters can legally take up to 20 geese a day, so long as those birds fall Tapping that abundance of birds will not within three groupings identified in the only expand hunting opportunities for 2017-18 waterfowl hunting rules. While waterfowlers, but will also provide some filling all three limits may be more likely in relief to farmers who lose a portion of their some areas than others, the new multi-bag crops to hungry geese every year. For these approach will provide all goose hunters reasons, many other states have already with more options than the single four-bird adjusted their bag limits – particularly for white and white-fronted geese. benefitted from recent weather conditions limit of previous years. on its breeding grounds in Alaska’s Copper The new bag limits received a strong Washington’s new bag limit establishes River Delta, the dusky population is not yet show of support from WDFW’s Waterfowl daily limits for specific species according strong enough to sustain hunting pressure.
    [Show full text]
  • Hybridization & Zoogeographic Patterns in Pheasants
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Paul Johnsgard Collection Papers in the Biological Sciences 1983 Hybridization & Zoogeographic Patterns in Pheasants Paul A. Johnsgard University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/johnsgard Part of the Ornithology Commons Johnsgard, Paul A., "Hybridization & Zoogeographic Patterns in Pheasants" (1983). Paul Johnsgard Collection. 17. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/johnsgard/17 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Papers in the Biological Sciences at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Paul Johnsgard Collection by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. HYBRIDIZATION & ZOOGEOGRAPHIC PATTERNS IN PHEASANTS PAUL A. JOHNSGARD The purpose of this paper is to infonn members of the W.P.A. of an unusual scientific use of the extent and significance of hybridization among pheasants (tribe Phasianini in the proposed classification of Johnsgard~ 1973). This has occasionally occurred naturally, as for example between such locally sympatric species pairs as the kalij (Lophura leucol11elana) and the silver pheasant (L. nycthelnera), but usually occurs "'accidentally" in captive birds, especially in the absence of conspecific mates. Rarely has it been specifically planned for scientific purposes, such as for obtaining genetic, morphological, or biochemical information on hybrid haemoglobins (Brush. 1967), trans­ ferins (Crozier, 1967), or immunoelectrophoretic comparisons of blood sera (Sato, Ishi and HiraI, 1967). The literature has been summarized by Gray (1958), Delacour (1977), and Rutgers and Norris (1970). Some of these alleged hybrids, especially those not involving other Galliformes, were inadequately doculnented, and in a few cases such as a supposed hybrid between domestic fowl (Gallus gal/us) and the lyrebird (Menura novaehollandiae) can be discounted.
    [Show full text]