Sydney Metro City & Southwest – Martin Place Station 9-19 Elizabeth Street, Sydney – Demolition Works
Construction Heritage Management Plan
Prepared for Lendlease
November 2018 • Issue D Project number 161035
Tanner Kibble Denton Architects Pty Ltd | ABN 77 001 209 392 | www.tkda.com.au Sydney Level 1, 19 Foster Street, Surry Hills NSW 2010 Australia | T+61 2 9281 4399 Brisbane Suite 9A, Level 7, 141 Queen Street, Brisbane QLD 4000 Australia | T+61 7 3087 0160 Principals Alex Kibble, Robert Denton, Megan Jones, John Rose | Practice Directors George Phillips, Jocelyn Jackson, Melanie Mackenzie Senior Associates Ian Burgher, Angelo Casado, David Earp, Anna Harris, Emma Lee, Scott MacArthur, Renata Ratcliffe, Lachlan Rowe Associates Asta Chow, Paul Dyson, Sean Williams NSW Nominated Architects Robert Denton Registration No 5782 | Alex Kibble Registration No 6015 9-19 Elizabeth Street, Sydney – Demolition Works • Construction Heritage Management Plan
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Table 0: Environmental Performance Outcomes compliance summary
Table 1: Construction Environmental Management Framework compliance summary
Table 2: Critical State Significant Infrastructure Approval CSSI 15_7400 MOD 3 compliance summary
1 INTRODUCTION 8 1.1 Project background 8 1.2 Purpose of the report 9 1.3 Scope of the Plan 9 1.4 Scope of the Works 10 1.5 Objectives 12 1.6 Authorship 12 1.7 Site location and description 12 1.8 Stakeholder Consultation 12 1.9 Terms and Definitions 13
2 Statutory and Project compliance requirements 15 2.1 Legislation 15 2.2 Project compliance requirements 16 2.3 Guidelines 16 2.4 Statutory heritage framework 17
3 Roles and Responsibilities 18
4 Context and Scope 24 4.1 Heritage values: 9-19 Elizabeth Street 24 4.2 Heritage investigation and management 24 4.3 Heritage management documents 24
5 Management of listed HISTORIC heritage items 26 5.1 Engagement of a heritage architect 26 5.2 Heritage Induction 26 5.3 Protection of historic fabric 26
6 Conditions of approval 28
7 Mitigation Measures 32 7.1 Revised Environmental Management Measures for Non-Aboriginal Heritage 32 7.2 Archaeology 35 7.3 Management Structures and Mitigation Measures 35
8 Compliance Records and Management 40
APPENDIX A SYDNEY METRO UNEXPECTED FINDS PROCEDURE VERSION 1.4 A-1
APPENDIX B RECORD OF STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION B-1
APPENDIX C DESIGN FOR THE INFILL OF THE FIVE INTER-CONNECTING OPENINGS BETWEEN 9-19 ELIZABETH STREET AND 50 MARTIN PLACE C-1
APPENDIX D EXTERNAL PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD OF 9-19 ELIZABETH STREET D-1
Tanner Kibble Denton Architects November 2018 • Issue D 1 9-19 Elizabeth Street, Sydney – Demolition Works • Construction Heritage Management Plan
Document / Status Register Issue Date Purpose Written Approved P1 20 July 2018 Draft for review GP GP P2 23 July 2018 Revised draft for review GP/SM GP P3 15 August 2018 Revised draft for review GP/SM GP P4 06 September 2018 Revised draft for review GP/SM GP P5 19 September 2018 Revised draft for review (incl City GP/SM GP of Sydney feedback) A 25 September 2018 Submission to ER GP/SM GP B 25 October 2018 Revised submission to ER GP/SM GP C 31 October 2018 Revised submission to ER GP/SM GP D 22 November 2018 Revised submission to DPE GP/SM GP
C:\Users\smacarthur\Documents\workingfiles\unionsquare.tkda.com.au\161035 181031 CHMP - 9-19 Elizabeth Street demo D.docx
Tanner Kibble Denton Architects November 2018 • Issue D 2 9-19 Elizabeth Street, Sydney – Demolition Works • Construction Heritage Management Plan
Construction Heritage Management Plan Compliance Matrix.
The relevant heritage conditions of approval for CSSI 15_7400 Mod 3 relating to the demolition of the building at 9-19 Elizabeth Street are summarised in the following tables 0, 1 and 2.
Table 0: Environmental Performance Outcomes compliance summary
This CHMP demonstrates compliance with condition C4(a) of the project Environmental Impact Statement, as amended by the Sydney Metro City and Southwest Chatswood to Sydenham Preferred Submissions and Preferred Infrastructure Report, October 2016 (PIR) as modified, in relation to the following fields.
Field Environmental performance outcomes Section in CHMP
Non- The project would be sympathetic to heritage items and, where Sections 5.1, 6, 7 Aboriginal feasible and reasonable, avoid and minimise impacts to non- Note: this CHMP is heritage Aboriginal heritage items and archaeology for demolition The design of the project would reflect the input of an works only - not independent heritage architect, relevant stakeholders and the permanent design. design review panel. Aboriginal The project would be sympathetic to heritage items and, where No excavation heritage feasible and reasonable, avoid and minimise impacts to works completed Aboriginal heritage items and archaeology under this The design of the project would reflect the input of an demolition CHMP independent heritage architect, relevant stakeholders and the and will not impact design review panel. archaeology or indigenous heritage
Table 1: Construction Environmental Management Framework compliance summary
Condition Description / Item Section in CHMP
10.2 a) Principal Contractors will develop and implement a Heritage Management Plan which will include at a minimum i Evidence of consultation with Registered Aboriginal Parties and Section 1 the NSW Heritage Council; ii Identify initiatives that will be implemented for the enhancement of Section 5 heritage values and minimisation of heritage impacts, including procedures and processes that will be used to implement and document heritage management initiatives; iii The heritage mitigation measures as detailed in the environmental Section 5 approval documentation; Section 6 iv The responsibilities of key project personnel with respect to the Section 3 implementation of the plan; Section 7 v Procedures for interpretation of heritage values uncovered through N/A salvage or excavation during detailed design; vi Procedures for undertaking salvage or excavation of heritage relics Section 5.3 or sites (where relevant), consistent with and any recordings of heritage relics prior to works commencing that would affect them; vii Details for the short and / or long term management of artefacts N/A or movable heritage;
Tanner Kibble Denton Architects November 2018 • Issue D 3 9-19 Elizabeth Street, Sydney – Demolition Works • Construction Heritage Management Plan
Condition Description / Item Section in CHMP
viii Details of management measures to be implemented to prevent Section 5 and minimise impacts on heritage items (including further heritage investigations, archival recordings and/or measures to protect unaffected sites during construction works in the vicinity); ix Procedures for unexpected heritage finds, including procedures Appendix A for dealing with human remains; x Heritage monitoring requirements; and Section 5
xi Compliance record generation and management. Section 8
b) The Contractor’s regular inspections will include checking of Section 3 heritage mitigation measures. c) Compliance records will be retained by the Contractor. These will include: i Inspections undertaken in relation to heritage management Section 3 measures; ii Archival recordings undertaken of any heritage item; Section 5
iii Unexpected finds and stop work orders; and Section 7
Iv Records of any impacts avoided or minimised through design or Section 5 construction methods.
Table 2: Critical State Significant Infrastructure Approval CSSI 15_7400 MOD 3 compliance summary
Condition Description / Item Section in CHMP
C1 A Construction Environmental Management Plan (CEMP) must be Not applicable to prepared in accordance with the Construction Environmental this CHMP – Management Framework (CEMF) included in the PIR and the covered by Department’s Guideline for the Preparation of Environmental CEMP Management Plans to detail how the performance outcomes, commitments and mitigation measures specified in Chapter 11 of the PIR, as amended by the documents listed in A1, will be implemented and achieved during construction. C2 The CEMP must provide: Not applicable to (a) a description of activities to be undertaken during construction this CHMP – (including the scheduling of construction); covered by (b) details of environmental policies, guidelines and principles to be CEMP followed in the construction of the CSSI; (c) a schedule for compliance auditing; (d) a program for ongoing analysis of the key environmental risks arising from the activities described in subsection (a) of this condition, including an initial risk assessment undertaken before the commencement of construction of the CSSI; (e) details of how the activities described in subsection (a) of this condition will be carried out to:
Tanner Kibble Denton Architects November 2018 • Issue D 4 9-19 Elizabeth Street, Sydney – Demolition Works • Construction Heritage Management Plan
Condition Description / Item Section in CHMP
i. meet the performance outcomes stated in the EIS as amended by the documents listed in A1; and ii. manage the risks identified in the risk analysis undertaken in subsection (d) of this condition; (f) an inspection program detailing the activities to be inspected and frequency of inspections; (g) a protocol for managing and reporting any: i. incidents; and ii. non-compliances with this approval and with statutory requirements; (h) procedures for rectifying any non-compliance with this approval identified during compliance auditing, incident management or at any time during construction; (i) a list of all the CEMP sub-plans required in respect of construction, as set out in Condition C3. Where staged construction of the CSSI is proposed, the CEMP must also identify which CEMP sub-plan applies to each of the proposed stages of construction; (j) a description of the roles and environmental responsibilities for relevant employees and their relationship with the ER; (k) for training and induction for employees, including contractors and sub-contractors, in relation to environmental and compliance obligations under the terms of this approval; (l) for periodic review and update of the CEMP and all associated plans and programs. C3 The following CEMP sub-plans must be prepared in consultation This Plan with the relevant government agencies identified for each CEMP sub-plan and be consistent with the CEMF and CEMP referred to in Condition C1. The Construction Traffic Management Plan must also be prepared in accordance with the Construction Traffic Management Framework as required by Condition E81. … Required CEMP sub-plan Relevant government agencies to be consulted for each CEMP sub-plan (g) Heritage Heritage Council (or its delegate) and Relevant Council (s) C4 The CEMP sub-plans must state how: Section 6 (a) the environmental performance outcomes identified in the EIS as Section 7 amended by the PIR as modified by these conditions will be achieved; (b) the mitigation measures identified in the EIS as amended by the PIR as modified by these conditions will be implemented; (c) the relevant terms of this approval will be complied with; and (d) issues requiring management during construction, as identified through ongoing environmental risk analysis, will be managed.
Tanner Kibble Denton Architects November 2018 • Issue D 5 9-19 Elizabeth Street, Sydney – Demolition Works • Construction Heritage Management Plan
Condition Description / Item Section in CHMP
C5 The CEMP sub-plans must be developed in consultation with Section 1 relevant government agencies. Where an agency(ies) request(s) is not included, the Proponent must provide the Secretary justification as to why. Details of all information requested by an agency to be included in a CEMP sub-plan as a result of consultation and copies of all correspondence from those agencies, must be provided with the relevant CEMP sub-plan. E10 Prevent damage to Heritage item. Section 6 E13 Prepare Heritage Archival Recording Report of heritage fabric to be Section 6 impacted. E14 Prepare external photographic record of building to be demolished. Section 6 E15 Salvage of heritage items. Section 6 E18 Appointment of Excavation Director Section 7 E22.1 Design of finishes to infilled openings between 9-19 Elizabeth Street Section 6 (Mod 3) and 50 Martin Place to be developed in consultation with heritage architect. E.26 Proponent not to harm, modify, or otherwise impact human remains Section 6 uncovered during the construction and operation of the CSSI, except in accordance with the Exhumation Management Plan (Condition E27). E28.1 Vibration screening criterion only to be varied from 7.5mm/s on Section 6 (Mod 3) advice of suitable qualified and experienced Structural Engineer. REMMs NAH1 Archival recording and reporting of the following heritage items Section 7 would be carried out in accordance with the NSW Heritage Office’s How to Prepare Archival Records of Heritage Items (1998a), and Photographic Recording of Heritage Items Using Film or Digital Capture (2006): Martin Place, between Elizabeth and Castlereagh streets, Sydney NAH3 An exhumation policy is not required for this stage of works. Section 7 However, the Unexpected Finds Procedure would be implemented Appendix A in the very unlikely event that any of any human skeletal remains being found. NAH4 The method for the demolition of existing buildings and / or Section 7 structures at Chatswood dive site, Victoria Cross Station, Martin Place Station, Pitt Street Station, Central Station and Waterloo Station would be developed to minimise direct and indirect impacts to adjacent and / or adjoining heritage items. NAH6 Prior to total or partial demolition of heritage items at Victoria Cross Section 7 and Martin Place stations, heritage fabric for salvage would be Section 5.3 identified and reuse opportunities for salvaged fabric considered. This would include salvage and reuse of heritage tiles to be impacted at Martin Place Station. NAH7 The project design would be sympathetic to heritage items and, Section 7 (Table 7) where reasonable and feasible, minimise impacts to the setting of heritage items. The detailed design for Martin Place Station and Central Station would be developed with input from a heritage architect.
Tanner Kibble Denton Architects November 2018 • Issue D 6 9-19 Elizabeth Street, Sydney – Demolition Works • Construction Heritage Management Plan
Condition Description / Item Section in CHMP
NAH11 Except for heritage significant elements affected by the project, Section 1.5 direct impact on other heritage significant elements forming part of Section 7 (Table 7) Section 7.3 the following items would be avoided: – The existing Martin Place Station
Tanner Kibble Denton Architects November 2018 • Issue D 7 9-19 Elizabeth Street, Sydney – Demolition Works • Construction Heritage Management Plan
1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Project background
The New South Wales Government through Transport for NSW is implementing Sydney’s Rail Future, a plan to transform and modernise Sydney’s rail network so that it can grow with the city’s population and meet the needs of commuters and customers in the future.
Sydney Metro is a new standalone rail network identified in Sydney’s Rail Future. The Sydney Metro network consists of Sydney Metro Northwest (previously known as the North West Rail Link), Sydney Metro City & Southwest, and Sydney Metro West. Sydney Metro West will service the key precincts of Greater Parramatta, Sydney Olympic Park, The Bays Precinct and the Sydney CBD.
On 9 January 2017 the Minister for Planning approved the Stage 2 (Chatswood to Sydenham) Metro application lodged by TfNSW as a Critical State Significant Infrastructure project.
An Unsolicited Proposal submission has been lodged by Macquarie to the NSW Government for the delivery of a single fully integrated station/Over Station Development (OSD) solution for the new Sydney Metro Martin Place Station – Integrated Station Development (MP-ISD). This submission includes the demolition of the building at 9-19 Elizabeth Street.
The MP-ISD development consists of the new Sydney Metro Martin Place Station, integrated station development (ISD) and the associated integrated civic, retail and commercial areas. This proposed redevelopment is to create a transportation metro precinct that offers mixed use space including commercial office space, modern retail outlets and civic space areas. The Over Station Development (OSD) comprises two commercial towers; the North Tower consists of 39 storeys of office space, and the South Tower consists of 29 storeys of office space. The South Tower will be constructed over the existing Eastern Suburbs Line.
The buildings located at 39 Martin Place, 55 Hunter Street, 5, 8-10 and 8A-12 Castlereagh Street and 9-19 Elizabeth Street have progressively been demolished by another contractor, prior to Lendlease commencing site establishment.
The site is to be split into three construction zones (North Tower, South Tower and Below Ground Station Box). The precinct is located between Hunter Street to the North, 39 Martin Place to the South, Elizabeth Street to the East and Castlereagh Street to the West.
The Sydney Metro Martin Place Station design proposal, involves the redevelopment of the site to accommodate for the following:
– Integration of an underground pedestrian link tunnel under 50 Martin Place, new metro train station, associated tunnel fit-out and retail and public domain spaces to both North and South Towers. This is covered under the existing Critically Significant State Infrastructure (CSSI) approval. – Construction of the 39 storey North Tower, comprising a reinforced concrete structure with a glass lift core on Castlereagh Street. – Integration of the North Tower and 50 Martin Place with interconnecting bridges at nominated levels, and a link to the ground floor, which will form the basis of the Stage 2 North Tower Development Application.
Tanner Kibble Denton Architects November 2018 • Issue D 8 9-19 Elizabeth Street, Sydney – Demolition Works • Construction Heritage Management Plan
1.2 Purpose of the report
MP-ISD represents a city changing opportunity for the city and the State. This Construction Heritage Management Plan (CHMP) considers the demolition works approved under Sydney Metro City & Southwest Chatswood to Sydenham project and the Critical State Significant Infrastructure Approval (CSSI) CSSI 15_7400. This approval is for the station works, and a separate State Significant Development application has been made for the over station development (OSD) component. OSD works are not considered within this Construction Heritage Management Plan (CHMP).
A modification to CSSI 15_7400 has been approved and addresses changes to the infrastructure works associated with the approved metro station at Martin Place that result from Macquarie’s integrated station and over station development solution (SSI 7400 MOD 3). The modification involves the following changes to the approved project:
– A larger, reconfigured station layout, including the addition of land at 9-19 Elizabeth Street and the alterations to the street level layout of the station entries. – The provision of a new unpaid concourse link (a link available to the general public without needing to pass through ticket gates) between the northern and southern station entries, extending beneath 50 Martin Place. – Retention of the existing MLC pedestrian link and works to connect the link to the Sydney Metro Martin Place Station.
This CHMP is a sub-plan of the Construction Environmental Management Plan prepared by Lendlease as per Condition of Consent CSSI C3. The CHMP has been prepared to outline the measures to mitigate potential heritage impacts associated with the demolition of the building at 9-19 Elizabeth Street, Sydney. Demolition of the building is approved as part of Transport for New South Wales’ (TfNSW) Critical State Significant Infrastructure Approval (CSSI) CSSI 15_7400 Mod 3. The demolition works being completed in this phase do not involve any excavation or permanent design works, and will not impact archaeology or indigenous heritage. Therefore, the scope of this CHMP relates to non-Aboriginal (historic) heritage associated with the demolition of the building at 9-19 Elizabeth Street.
The CHMP has been prepared for Lendlease on behalf of Macquarie Group Limited (Macquarie) to address the requirements of CSSI approval condition C3. The Plan addresses the relevant requirements of TfNSW’s Construction Environmental Management Framework (CEMF) and the Revised Environmental Mitigation Measures (REMMs) outlined in Chapter 11 of the Submissions and Preferred Infrastructure Report (SPIR).
The relevant heritage conditions of approval and responses to those conditions for CSSI 15_7400 Mod 3, relating to the demolition of the building at 9-19 Elizabeth Street, are summarised in Tables 0, 1 and 2.
1.3 Scope of the Plan
The station works will be completed over a number of phases which are summarised in Table 3:
Tanner Kibble Denton Architects November 2018 • Issue D 9 9-19 Elizabeth Street, Sydney – Demolition Works • Construction Heritage Management Plan
Table 3: Sydney Metro Martin Place Station Works Phases
Works Phase Site Responsible Contractor Status
Demolition of buildings on North site Metropolitan Demolitions – Complete the Martin Place north novated to the Tunnelling and site – excluding 9-19 Station Excavation (TSE) Elizabeth St Contractor
Demolition of buildings on South site TSE Contractor Commenced the Martin Place south site
Excavation of the south South site TSE Contractor Not started shaft (south site)
Demolition of 9-19 North site Lendlease Not started Elizabeth Street (north site)
Excavation of the north North site Lendlease Not started shaft (north site)
Sydney Metro Martin North Site, South Lendlease Not Started Place Station site subsurface. construction
This Construction Heritage Management Plan (CHMP) has been initially developed to account for the demolition works at 9-19 Elizabeth Street only as highlighted in dark grey in the table 3 above, as per the Sydney Metro City & Southwest Chatswood to Sydenham Staging Report. The demolition is a stage under the staging report. A further revision of this CHMP will be completed to provide full details of the excavation and station construction phases.
The scope of this CHMP relates to non-Aboriginal (historic) heritage associated with the demolition of the building at 9-19 Elizabeth Street, as part of the Sydney Metro Martin Place Station North Site. The Plan builds upon the historic heritage assessment undertaken in the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) and the Submissions and Preferred Infrastructure Report (SPIR).
Relevant consent conditions and how they are to be addressed are set out in section 6. Potential heritage impacts and the proposed mitigation measures are outlined in section 7. A compliance matrix is included in Tables 1 and 2.
It is noted that no archaeological excavations are associated with the demolition of the building at 9-19 Elizabeth Street. The base slab of this building is not to be removed as part of the building demolition works. However, in the event of the discovery of potential heritage or archaeological finds during the demolition, the Sydney Metro Unexpected Finds Procedure (UFP) (Version 1.4) will apply. Refer Appendix A.
1.4 Scope of the Works
The proposed scope of works comprises the demolition of the building at 9-19 Elizabeth Street including: Tanner Kibble Denton Architects November 2018 • Issue D 10 9-19 Elizabeth Street, Sydney – Demolition Works • Construction Heritage Management Plan
Installing A and B class hoarding
B Class Hoardings will be installed to the perimeter of the site on Elizabeth, Hunter and Castlereagh Streets. On completion of the demolition works the B class hoarding will be removed and replaced with an A Class Hoarding to the perimeter of the site at street level.
Erecting scaffolding
Heavy duty scaffolding with shade cloth and mesh will be installed to all perimeter faces for all four buildings prior to commencement of main demolition works.
The removal of hazardous materials
Hazardous material surveys have been completed for all four buildings. Hazardous materials including friable and non-friable asbestos, PCB’s, Lead Paint, Ozone Depleting gases will be removed by licenced contractors prior to the demolition of the buildings.
Decommissioning of plant
All four buildings have dedicated plant rooms at the roof level. These plant rooms will be decommissioned and where applicable some items will be salvaged for reuse.
Soft strip out
The removal of furniture, fitting, fixtures and non-load baring walls ceilings and the like will be removed separated and taken off site for reuse and recycling where applicable. The soft strip of each floor will progress ahead of the structural demolition of the buildings to better manage segregation of materials.
Demolition of structure
In order to minimise impacts on 50 Martin Place, alternate demolition techniques have been considered. Alternative demolition techniques that minimise noise and vibration levels will be implemented, and will include:
– Maximising use of hydraulic concrete shears in lieu of hammers/rock breakers to minimise vibration generation – Sequencing works to shield sensitive receivers by retaining building wall elements – Locating demolition load out areas away from 50 Martin Place
Methods to minimise structural-borne noise to adjacent buildings include separating the structural connection prior to demolition through saw-cutting and propping, using hand held splitters and pulverisers or hand demolition.
The main structural demolition of the 9-19 Elizabeth St structure will be by 5-13T excavators with hammer/pulveriser attachment to progressively demolish typical floors including slabs, walls, columns and façade in the general top-down sequence. Rubble created will be processed and transferred to a chute on each level to the sorting area adjacent the building. Plant on the ground floor will continuously load trucks for material recovery. Scaffold is to be progressively dismantled as the building is demolished.
Noise and vibration management
Noise and Vibration management is detailed in the Construction Noise and Vibration Management Plan - Demolition. Both attended and unattended noise and vibration monitoring will be carried out at nearby receivers and stakeholders throughout the main demolition works.
Tanner Kibble Denton Architects November 2018 • Issue D 11 9-19 Elizabeth Street, Sydney – Demolition Works • Construction Heritage Management Plan
Waste recycling, salvage and removal of demolition materials
Throughout the works materials will be segregated into reuse/recyclable/disposal.
Air quality management
Throughout the demolition works the principle method of dust control will be wetting down. Reducing dust at the source will be the primary objective. Shade cloth will also be installed around the building during demolition to control fugitive dust emissions from occurring. This will minimise dust and debris from the demolition works impacting 50 Martin Place.
Traffic management
These works are detailed in the Construction Traffic Management Plan – Demolition (CTMP). The CTMP for the project has been approved by all relevant authorities including the City of Sydney, RMS, and The Traffic Co-ordination Office
1.5 Objectives
Consistent with the Construction Environmental Management Framework (CEMF), the objectives of this Plan are to:
– Minimise impacts on items or places of heritage value – Avoid accidental impacts on heritage items; and – Maximise worker’s awareness of non-indigenous heritage.
Having regard for these, the following heritage management objectives for the demolition of 9-19 Elizabeth Street apply:
– Implement measures to avoid damage of heritage fabric of the adjacent heritage item at 50 Martin Place, including vibration monitoring and temporary protective works – Ensure construction workers are inducted so that they understand the significance of 50 Martin Place.
1.6 Authorship
This Plan was prepared by Scott MacArthur, Senior Associate, and George Phillips, Practice Director, and reviewed by George Phillips, Practice Director, of Tanner Kibble Denton Architects.
1.7 Site location and description
The building at 9-19 Elizabeth Street, Sydney, is located on the east side of Elizabeth Street in the block between Martin Place and Hunter Street (Figure 1). It is located to the immediate north of Macquarie’s global headquarters building at 50 Martin Place, the former Government Savings Bank of NSW.
1.8 Stakeholder Consultation
Consent condition C3 (g) of CSSI 15_7400 Mod 3 requires that the CHMP be prepared for the Project in consultation with the relevant Council (City of Sydney) and the NSW Heritage Council.
Stakeholder consultations, comments and implementation outcomes are included in Appendix B.
Registered Aboriginal Party (RAP) consultation will not be undertaken for this phase as no excavation or permanent design works are being completed under the demolition phase of the works. As per the Sydney Metro City and Southwest Chatswood to Sydenham Staging Report, Appendix C, Section 10.2 of the CEMF, is partially applicable to the demolition stage of the works as follows – ‘to the extent of non- aboriginal heritage only (no impacts to ground surface profiles)’.
Tanner Kibble Denton Architects November 2018 • Issue D 12 9-19 Elizabeth Street, Sydney – Demolition Works • Construction Heritage Management Plan
1.9 Terms and Definitions
The following acronyms are used throughout this Plan:
AA Acoustic Advisor CEMF Construction Environmental Management Framework CEMP Construction Environmental Management Plan CHL Commonwealth Heritage List CHMP Construction Heritage Management Plan CNVIS Construction Noise and Vibration Impact Statement CNVMP Construction Noise And Vibration Management Plan CoA Conditions of Approval CSSI Critical State Significant Infrastructure CTMP Construction Traffic Management Plan DP&E/DPE Department of Planning and Environment ECM Environmental Condition Map EIS Environmental Impact Statement ER Environmental Representative LL Lendlease LEP Local Environmental Plan MCoA Modified Conditions of Approval MP-ISD Martin Place – Integrated Station Development NHL National Heritage List OEH Office of Environment and Heritage OSD Over Station Development QSE Quality Safety and Environment REMM Revised Environmental Mitigation Measures (Chapter 11, SPIR) RMS Roads and Maritime Services SAP Sensitive Area Plans SEP Site Environmental Plan SHR NSW State Heritage Register SM Sydney Metro SMC&SW Sydney Metro City & South West SPIR/PIR The Sydney Metro City and Southwest Chatswood to Sydenham Preferred Submissions and Preferred Infrastructure Report, October 2016 SYAB [Sydney Metro City and Southwest] Sydney Yard Access Bridge TfNSW Transport for NSW TKD Architects Tanner Kibble Denton Architects TSE Tunnel and Station Excavation [Works] WHL World Heritage List
Tanner Kibble Denton Architects November 2018 • Issue D 13 9-19 Elizabeth Street, Sydney – Demolition Works • Construction Heritage Management Plan
Key Plan
Sydney Metro Martin Place Station – North Site
9-19 Elizabeth Street
50 Martin Place
Sydney Metro Martin Place Station – South Site
1 Location plan, not to scale. Source: Google Maps with TKD overlay.
Tanner Kibble Denton Architects November 2018 • Issue D 14 9-19 Elizabeth Street, Sydney – Demolition Works • Construction Heritage Management Plan
2 STATUTORY AND PROJECT COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS
2.1 Legislation
Table 4 below details the legislation and planning instruments considered during development of this Plan.
Table 4: Legislation and Planning Instruments
Legislation Description Relevance to this CHMP
Environmental Planning This Act establishes a system of The approval conditions and and Assessment Act environmental planning and obligations arising from the approval 1979 assessment of development of CSSI 15_7400 are incorporated proposals for the State. into this CHMP. As the Project is Critical State Significant Infrastructure (CSSI), the requirements of the Heritage Act 1977 and the National Parks and Wildlife Act 1974 are being assessed under Part 5.1 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.
Environment Protection The main purpose of this Act is to Not relevant as no NHL, CHL or WHL and Biodiversity provide for the protection of the items Conservation Act 1999 environment especially those (Commonwealth) aspects that are of national environmental importance and to promote ecological sustainable development. Heritage places are listed on the National Heritage List (NHL) for their ‘outstanding heritage value to the nation’ and are owned by a variety of constituents, including government agencies, organisations or individuals. Only items owned or controlled by the Commonwealth that have been meet the threshold for national heritage listing under the Environmental Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act) are listed on the Commonwealth Heritage List (CHL) and afforded protection under the EPBC Act.
National Parks and The main purpose of this Act is firstly Not relevant, as no potential for Wildlife Act 1974 in respect to the protection and Aboriginal Heritage Items has been preservation of aboriginal artefacts. identified within the demolition area. Discovery of material on site Not relevant. No threatened species suspected as being of aboriginal are potentially impacted by the works. origin must be reported and protected pending assessment and direction by the Client’s Representative. Secondly it is an offence under Part 8A of this Act to pick or harm threatened species. (Refer to the notes under the Threatened Species Conservation Act for more information).
Tanner Kibble Denton Architects November 2018 • Issue D 15 9-19 Elizabeth Street, Sydney – Demolition Works • Construction Heritage Management Plan
Legislation Description Relevance to this CHMP
Heritage Act 1977 This Act provides for the preservation Heritage Items are identified adjacent and conservation of heritage items to the subject site and addressed as such as building, works, relic, places part of the CoA. of historic interest, scientific, cultural, social, archaeological, architectural, natural or aesthetic significance. It is an offence under this Act to willfully and knowingly damage or destroy items of heritage value. Do not demolish damage, move or develop around any place, building, work, relic, moveable object, precinct, or land that is the subject of an interim heritage order or listing on the State Heritage Register or heritage listing in a Local Environmental Plan without an approval from the Heritage Council (NSW) or local council.
Aboriginal and Torres This Act provides for the preservation No areas or objects within the works Strait Islander Heritage and protection from injury or site have been identified as being Protection Act 1984 desecration to areas and objects of subject to such a declaration and this (Commonwealth) particular significance to Aboriginals. Act is of no relevance to the project. Areas and objects can be protected by Ministerial Declaration and it is then and offence to contravene such a declaration.
2.2 Project compliance requirements
Key planning requirements from the Project Planning Approval are summarised in the CHMP Compliance Matrix included in this Plan (refer to Tables 1 and 2). This matrix also includes key requirements from TfNSW’s Construction Environmental Management Framework (Revised) for preparation of a Heritage Construction Management Plan.
Additional heritage management requirements from the Project Planning Approval and Revised Environmental Management Measures are included in sections 6 and 7 of this Plan.
2.3 Guidelines
Relevant guidelines include:
– Assessing Heritage Significance (NSW Heritage Office 2001) – Levels of Heritage Significance (NSW Heritage Office 2008) – Investigating Heritage Significance (NSW Heritage Office 2001) – NSW Government’s Aboriginal Participation in Construction Guidelines (2007). – How to Prepare Archival Recording of Heritage Items (Heritage Branch 1998). – Photographic Recording of Heritage Items Using Film or Digital Capture (Heritage Branch 2006).
Tanner Kibble Denton Architects November 2018 • Issue D 16 9-19 Elizabeth Street, Sydney – Demolition Works • Construction Heritage Management Plan
2.4 Statutory heritage framework
The building at 9-19 Elizabeth Street is not included in any statutory heritage listings. It adjoins the building 50 Martin Place, a building which is included in the NSW State Heritage Register (SHR No. 01427) and is identified as a heritage item in the City of Sydney Local Environmental Plan (Item No. I1895).
Other heritage items in the vicinity
The Sydney Metro Chatswood to Sydenham EIS established a 25 metre study ‘buffer’ zone to identify heritage items that may be within the visual catchment of the project and where potential visual impacts on that item may occur. The buffer zone also supports assessment of other potential indirect impacts on heritage fabric of heritage items that may be in the vicinity of the site (eg as a result of vibration). However, the buffer zone highlighted in the EIS is for the entire northern site (not including 9-19 Elizabeth Street), and no revised buffer zone has been defined in Mod 3. No other heritage buildings in the vicinity (including those on Hunter Street) are potentially impacted by the demolition of 9-19 Elizabeth Street.
Tanner Kibble Denton Architects November 2018 • Issue D 17 9-19 Elizabeth Street, Sydney – Demolition Works • Construction Heritage Management Plan
3 ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
The responsibilities of key personnel for Heritage Management are included in Table 5 below.
Table 5: 9-19 Elizabeth Street Demolition - Responsibilities of Key Personnel for Heritage Management
Role / Position Responsibilities DPE Responsible for the approval of the CHMP.
Environmental The ER who is engaged as required by MCoA A24(1)of CSSI 15-7400 for the Project Representative will: receive and respond to communications from the Secretary in relation to the environmental performance of the CSSI; consider and inform the Secretary on matters specified in the terms of this approval; consider and recommend any improvements that may be made to work practices to avoid or minimise adverse impact to the environment and to the community; review all documents required to be prepared under the terms of this approval, ensure they address any requirements in or under this approval and if so, endorse them before submission to the Secretary (if required to be submitted to the Secretary) or before implementation (if not required to be submitted to the Secretary). For documents requiring specialist review and/or endorsement the ER is not required to endorse the specialist content; regularly monitor the implementation of all documents required by the terms of this approval for implementation in accordance with what is stated in the document and the terms of this approval; review the Proponent’s notification of incidents in accordance with Condition A41 of this approval; as may be requested by the Secretary, help plan, attend or undertake Department audits of the CSSI, briefings, and site visits; if conflict arises between the Proponent and the community in relation to the environmental performance of the CSSI, follow the procedure in the Community Communication Strategy approved under Condition B3 of this approval to attempt to resolve the conflict, and if it cannot be resolved, notify the Secretary; review any draft consistency assessment that may be carried out by the Proponent, and provide advice on any additional mitigation measures required to minimise the impact of the work; consider any minor amendments to be made to the CEMP, CEMP sub-plans and monitoring programs that comprise updating or are of an administrative nature, and are consistent with the terms of this approval and the CEMP, CEMP sub-plans and monitoring programs approved by the Secretary and, if satisfied such amendment is necessary, approve the amendment. This does not include any modifications to the terms of this approval; assess the impacts of minor ancillary facilities as required by Condition A18 of this approval; and prepare and submit to the Secretary and other relevant regulatory agencies, for information, a monthly Environmental Representative Report detailing the ER’s actions and decisions on matters for which the ER was responsible in the preceding month (or other timeframe agreed with the Secretary). The Environmental Representative Report must be submitted within seven (7) days following the end of each month for the duration of works and construction of the CSSI, or as otherwise agreed with the Secretary.
Tanner Kibble Denton Architects November 2018 • Issue D 18 9-19 Elizabeth Street, Sydney – Demolition Works • Construction Heritage Management Plan
Role / Position Responsibilities Acoustic The independent Acoustic Advisor (AA is engaged as required by MCoA A25(1)of Advisor ) CSSI 15-7400 for the Project. The primary role of the AA is to independently oversee construction noise and vibration planning, management and mitigation in accordance with the Project Planning Approval. The role of the AA is set out under Project Planning Approval Conditions A25 to A27 and is as follows: Receive and respond to communication from the Secretary of DP&E in relation to the performance of the Works in relation to noise and vibration Consider and inform the Secretary of DP&E on matters specified in the terms of the Project relating to noise and vibration. Planning Approval relating to noise and vibration. Consider and recommend, to the Proponent, improvements that may be made to work practices to avoid or minimise adverse noise and vibration impacts. Review all noise and vibration documents required to be prepared under the terms of the Project Planning Approval and, should they be consistent with the terms of the Project Planning Approval, endorse them before submission to the Secretary (if required to be submitted to the Secretary) or before implementation (if not required to be submitted to the Secretary) Regularly monitor the implementation of all noise and vibration documents required to be prepared under the terms of this approval to ensure implementation is in accordance with what is stated in the document and the terms of the Project Planning Approval Notify the Secretary of DP&E of noise and vibration incidents in accordance with Condition A41 of the Project Planning Approval. In conjunction with the ER, the AA must: Consider requests for out of hours construction activities and determine whether to endorse the proposed activities in accordance with Condition E47. As may be requested by the DP&E or Complaints Commissioner, help plan, attend or undertake audits of noise and vibration management of the works including briefings, and site visits If conflict arises between the Proponent and the community in relation to the noise and vibration performance during construction of the CSSI, follow the procedure in the Community Communication Strategy approved under Condition B3 of the Project Planning Approval to attempt to resolve the conflict, and if it cannot be resolved, notify the Secretary Consider relevant minor amendments made to this CEMP, relevant sub-plans and noise and vibration monitoring programs that require updating or are of an administrative nature, and are consistent with the terms of the Project Planning Approval and the management plans and monitoring programs approved by the Secretary and, if satisfied such amendment is necessary, endorse the amendment. This does not include any modifications to the terms of the Project Planning Approval Assess the noise impacts of minor ancillary facilities as required by Condition A18 of the Project Planning Approval, and Prepare and submit to the Secretary and other relevant regulatory agencies, for information, a monthly Noise and Vibration Report detailing the AAs actions and decisions on matters for which the AA was responsible in the preceding month (or other timeframe agreed with the Secretary). The Noise and Vibration Report must be submitted within seven (7) days following the end of each month for the duration of construction of the CSSI, or as otherwise agreed with the DP&E.
Tanner Kibble Denton Architects November 2018 • Issue D 19 9-19 Elizabeth Street, Sydney – Demolition Works • Construction Heritage Management Plan
Role / Position Responsibilities Project Approve the CEMP and sub plans including the CHMP. Director Be available to discuss when required the CoA regarding 9-19 Elizabeth with Sydney Metro and the Heritage Specialist. Consult with Sydney Metro, Sydney City Council and NSW Heritage Council as required. Ensure implementation of CHMP by Project Manager and Site Supervisor. Ensure heritage issues are appropriately addressed. Liaison with Sydney Metro and OEH and other stakeholders, as required. Project Maintain and implement the CHMP and addendum that may come as a result Manager of the Heritage specialist. Ensure that works are undertaken in accordance with Heritage Plan and addendums. Ensure workers are aware of Lendlease’s heritage requirements and undertake appropriate training as required. Review the aspects/impacts for the project and ensure the CHMP addresses all requirements. Liaison with Sydney Metro and other stakeholders as required. Arrange and provide resources as required for the project. Monitoring corrective actions to ensure implementation and continuous improvement and performance of individuals. Promoting awareness and taking action to correct situations of inadequate environmental control or instances of poor behaviour.
Site Supervisor Implement the CHMP on site. Ensure that all workers are properly inducted as per the requirements of this CHMP. Provide sufficient resources for the successful management of sustainability. Undertake regular inspections for compliance of heritage management and mitigation measures, providing weekly Site Inspection Reports Communicate site issues, incidents and sustainability performance to management.
Tanner Kibble Denton Architects November 2018 • Issue D 20 9-19 Elizabeth Street, Sydney – Demolition Works • Construction Heritage Management Plan
Role / Position Responsibilities Environmental Document any non-conformance with this CHMP. Undertake a further Manager detailed investigation where appropriate. Recommend and initiate solutions to issues and verify implementation where required Ensure relevant heritage records are maintained in collaboration with the Site Supervisor Collate compliance material for Sydney Metro compliance reporting Issue monthly Noise and Vibration Monitoring Report to Sydney Metro, Environmental Representative and Acoustic advisor Issue Pre-Construction Compliance Report (endorsed by Environmental Representative) to DPE Issue six monthly Construction Compliance reports to DPE Take prompt and effective action to address any non-conformances with this CHMP and provide appropriate corrective actions Undertake regular inspections for compliance of heritage management and mitigation measures, providing weekly Site Inspection Reports Review the CHMP monthly to identify opportunities to improve its suitability, adequacy and effectiveness. This review will include: – Corrective actions implemented are effective; – Corrective actions can be extended to other operational activities (where relative); – Lessons learnt from root causes are extended to other operational activities (where relative); – Implement additional corrective and preventative actions as required for improvement; – Identification of opportunities for new sustainability initiatives. Worker Carry out their work in accordance with the CHMP and other requirements of this CHMP. Work in a manner without risk to themselves, others or the environment. Participate in pre-start and toolbox meetings, training programs, risks reviews, inspections and audits as required by Lendlease. Report all incidents to the Site Supervisor. Follow instructions as required by the Site Supervisor / Environmental Representative. Contractor / Provide input into preservation of materials and oversee removal and Sub-Contractor storage of items. Ensure all plant and equipment is fit for use and appropriately tested and maintained. Adequately instruct their workers in correct methods and environmental safe working practices. Report all incidents to the Site Supervisor. Follow instructions as required by the Site Supervisor / Environmental Representative. Regular inspections to include checking of heritage mitigation measures.
Heritage Provide expert advice on non-Aboriginal heritage issues. architect Assist in development of a Construction Heritage Management Plan for 9- 19 Elizabeth St demolition. Complete building archival photography prior to demolition works. Site inspections / advice when required for unexpected finds or impact to known heritage items. Consultation / liaison with Heritage Council, OEH Heritage Division and other stakeholders. Other non-Aboriginal heritage services as required. Prepare heritage inductions of site workers.
Tanner Kibble Denton Architects November 2018 • Issue D 21 9-19 Elizabeth Street, Sydney – Demolition Works • Construction Heritage Management Plan
Role / Position Responsibilities
Structural Provide advice in relation to monitoring of site activities in accordance with engineering the Construction Noise and Vibration Monitoring Management Plan. consultant (with Provide advice on methods and locations for installing equipment used for heritage vibration, movement and noise monitoring of heritage-listed structures. experience) Provide advice in relation to alternative methods of demolition to minimize noise and vibration. In accordance with CSSI Condition E.28.1 (Mod 3), the appointed structural engineer with heritage experience is to investigate whether the vibration screening criterion for 50 Martin Place can be increased from 7.5mm/s to 25mm/s. Refer to Section 6 for methodology in response to CSSI Condition E.28.1 (Mod 3).
Acoustic Provide expert advice on noise and vibration issues. consultant Develop a Construction Noise and Vibration Impact Statement to model predicted impacts from the project works. Assist in development of a Construction Noise and Vibration Management Plan. Monitor the implementation of the Construction Noise and Vibration Management Plan. Other noise and vibration advice / tasks as required.
Archaeologist / LL will appoint an Excavation Director as per condition E18, prior to the demolition Aboriginal works starting on site. In the event of an unanticipated heritage find, the Sydney heritage Metro Unexpected Finds Procedure (UFP) (Version 1.4) (refer to Appendix A) will consultant be implemented, in accordance with the following procedure; – Stop work, protect item and inform the Lendlease Site Manager and/or Site Supervisor. – Establish a ‘no-go zone’ around the item. Use high visibility fencing, where practical. No work is to be undertaken within this zone until further investigations are completed and, if required, appropriate approvals are obtained. Inform all site personnel about the no-go zone. – Contact the Excavation Director. – Archaeologist and/or an Aboriginal heritage consultant to prepare preliminary assessment and recording of the find. – Archaeologist and/or an Aboriginal heritage consultant to notify the regulator, if required. – Implement archaeological or heritage management plan, if required. – Resume work.
QSE Manager Establish and maintain Lendlease’s Integrated QSE Management System. Represent Lendlease on sustainability matters including liaison with the regulator. Support the project team in development and implementation of this CHMP. Monitor the effectiveness of Lendlease’s QSE Management System Undertake and coordinate QSE audits Monitor and communicate QSE Alerts and changes to legislation
Tanner Kibble Denton Architects has been engaged by Macquarie to prepare this Plan and for the provision of heritage advice to Lendlease during the design and construction phases of the project. Heritage management responsibilities include:
Tanner Kibble Denton Architects November 2018 • Issue D 22 9-19 Elizabeth Street, Sydney – Demolition Works • Construction Heritage Management Plan
– design and documentation for the removal and infilling of the inter-connecting openings between the buildings at 9-19 Elizabeth Street and 50 Martin Place (separate documentation, refer section 4.3); – Prepare an impact assessment for low impact pre-commencement works (separate report, refer section 4.3); – the identification of potential heritage impacts associated with the demolition of 9-19 Elizabeth Street (subject of this report); – provision of advice to assist in mitigating or minimising heritage impacts; – provision of advice for the protection of the adjacent heritage item at 50 Martin Place; – provision of advice during the construction phase attendance on site during demolition works at key phases of the project.
Tanner Kibble Denton Architects November 2018 • Issue D 23 9-19 Elizabeth Street, Sydney – Demolition Works • Construction Heritage Management Plan
4 CONTEXT AND SCOPE
4.1 Heritage values: 9-19 Elizabeth Street
The building at 9-19 Elizabeth Street was completed in 1966 to the design of Alexander Kann Finch & Associates. The Australian Taxation Office, which occupied part of 50 Martin Place, moved into the part of the newly completed building from 1967. Five openings were formed between the two adjacent buildings at this time. The openings are located within the curved end walls of the original 1928 north-east egress stair at 50 Martin Place, connecting through to 9-19 Elizabeth Street at levels 1, 3, 4, 5 and 7.
9-19 Elizabeth Street is not considered to have any architectural merit or heritage value, and is not included in any statutory heritage listings.
As the building has no identified heritage status, its demolition will not result in any adverse heritage impacts. Potential impacts on heritage values arising from its demolition are associated with the adjacent building at 50 Martin Place, the former Government Savings Bank of NSW.
Other heritage listed items in the environs of 9-19 Elizabeth Street include the former Qantas House, Chifley Square, the former City Mutual Life Assurance building and Richard Johnson Square. Owing to their distance from the subject site, there are no adverse heritage impacts on these heritage items arising from the demolition of 9-19 Elizabeth Street.
4.2 Heritage investigation and management
The scope of heritage investigation and management relating to the demolition of the building comprises:
– Design for the infill of the five inter-connecting openings between 9-19 Elizabeth Street and 50 Martin Place; – Photographic recording of the exterior of the building; – Archival recording of the five inter-connecting openings, prior to commencement of works. – Protection of the façades of 50 Martin Place, to mitigation potential damage of historic building fabric; – Settlement and vibration modelling and monitoring to identify any changes to construction methodologies to minimize impacts on 50 Martin Place.
4.3 Heritage management documents
Documents for heritage management for the demolition of the building are outlined below:
Infill of the five inter-connecting openings between 9-19 Elizabeth Street and 50 Martin Place
Design for the infill of the five inter-connecting openings between 9-19 Elizabeth Street and 50 Martin Place Architectural drawings prepared by Tanner Kibble Denton Architects, July 2017:
Tanner Kibble Denton Architects November 2018 • Issue D 24 9-19 Elizabeth Street, Sydney – Demolition Works • Construction Heritage Management Plan
Drawing No. (revision) Drawing Title - AR.TD.0000 (P4) Cover sheet and site plan - AR.TD.0001 (P4) Location plan and photo - AR.TD.0002 (P4) Level 1 proposed infill – plan and elevation - AR.TD.0003 (P4) Level 3 proposed infill – plan and elevation - AR.TD.0004 (P4) Level 4 proposed infill – plan and elevation - AR.TD.0005 (P4) Level 5 proposed infill – plan and elevation - AR.TD.0006 (P4) Level 7 proposed infill – plan and elevation - AR.TD.0007 (P4) Schedule of Wall Types and Finishes
These documents have been submitted to DP&E as part of the Pre-Construction Low Impact Works Package, which was approved by DP&E on 4 September 2018. The works are currently underway. The works are not covered by this CHMP, but the TKD Architects drawings are included in Appendix C for information.
Photographic recording of the exterior of the building
Photographic record was prepared by Tanner Kibble Denton Architects, July 2018, in satisfaction of Condition of Approval for CSSI 15_7400 Mod 3 (COA) E14 and submitted to City of Sydney. The photographic record does not require DP&E approval, and is provided in Appendix D for information.
Archival record of the inter-connecting openings
Archival record prepared by Tanner Kibble Denton Architects, July 2018, prepared in accordance with NSW Heritage Office guidelines ‘How to Prepare Archival Records of Heritage Items (1998) and ‘Photographic Recording of Heritage Items Using Film or Digital Capture (2006), in satisfaction of Condition of Approval for CSSI_7400 Mod 3 (COA) E13. This archival record relates to the separate Pre- Construction Low Impact Works Package and is not included in this CHMP as it is not part of the scope of works covered by this CHMP.
Protection of 50 Martin Place
– Construction Environmental Management Plan, prepared by Lendlease (Revision 0). – Construction Noise and Vibration Management Plan, prepared by Renzo Tonin (TK422-F03[r3]).
Settlement and vibration modelling
– Construction Noise and Vibration Management Plan, prepared by Renzo Tonin (TK422-F03[r3]). – Monitoring and Protection Plan, prepared by Renzo Tonin.
Refer to section 7.3 Management Structures and Mitigation Measures of this CHMP for further detail and discussion of demolition risks to the heritage building and mitigating protection strategies.
Tanner Kibble Denton Architects November 2018 • Issue D 25 9-19 Elizabeth Street, Sydney – Demolition Works • Construction Heritage Management Plan
5 MANAGEMENT OF LISTED HISTORIC HERITAGE ITEMS
The building at 50 Martin Place is the only listed heritage item in the immediate vicinity of 9-19 Elizabeth Street. It is heritage listed at state and local levels. The building has the potential to be directly impacted by the demolition of 9-19 Elizabeth Street. Other heritage listed items in the environs of 9-19 Elizabeth Street include the former Qantas House, Chifley Square, the former City Mutual Life Assurance building and Richard Johnson Square. Owing to their distance from the subject site, there are no adverse heritage impacts on these heritage items arising from the demolition of 9-19 Elizabeth Street.
Heritage management processes for 50 Martin Place which will be implemented are set out below:
5.1 Engagement of a heritage architect
George Phillips of Tanner Kibble Denton Architects is engaged by Macquarie as the nominated heritage architect for the project, and will be responsible for
– archival recording of 50 Martin Place prior to commencement of works; – external photographic recording of 9-19 Elizabeth Street prior to commencement of works; – preparation of a pre-commencement Low Impact Works application, for the infilling of the five inter- connecting openings between 9-19 Elizabeth Street and 50 Martin Place; – design and documentation of the infilling of the five inter-connection openings; – inspection of the buildings prior to commencement of works; – heritage induction of construction works; – monitoring of the works.
5.2 Heritage Induction
Prior to the start of work all on-site staff will be given a heritage induction. The Induction will comprise an illustrated easy to understand presentation and hard copy, which will include:
– Introduction to working on, or adjacent to, a heritage building (with general principles including ‘Ask before you act’ /’If in doubt, ask’ / why, how and where to seek advice); – History of the site and 50 Martin Place; – Project scope and limits of the CSSI approval; – Understanding the heritage significance of 50 Martin Place; – Taking care of the building (50 Martin Place); – The roles and responsibilities of the Excavation Director, archaeologist and built heritage consultants; – Authorisation for installation and or removal of protection (temporary or permanent); – Impacts arising from poor services coordination, including temporary services installation; – Understanding the unexpected heritage finds procedures (UFP) and confidentiality requirements for the project; – Repercussions of any breaches to the approved heritage protection strategy.
5.3 Protection of historic fabric
Prior to commencement of works:
– Provision of a methodology for the protection of historic fabric and finishes including non-physical methods and proposed materials; – Engagement of appropriately qualified and skilled tradespeople; – Provision of a trial removal of internal finishes for review and approval by the heritage architect. – Provision of a methodology for the removal of internal finishes to 50 Martin Place (wall tiles) to be salvaged for re-use / storage (the tiles removal and salvage are part of the Pre-construction Low
Tanner Kibble Denton Architects November 2018 • Issue D 26 9-19 Elizabeth Street, Sydney – Demolition Works • Construction Heritage Management Plan
Impact Works. Appendix C contains the approval letter from DPE for the Low Impact Works, as per MCoA 22.1, dated 04/09/18. Note that MCoA E22 is not triggered as the demolition of 9-19 Elizabeth does not impact Martin Place Railway Station).
Tanner Kibble Denton Architects November 2018 • Issue D 27 9-19 Elizabeth Street, Sydney – Demolition Works • Construction Heritage Management Plan
6 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
The relevant conditions of approval for CSSI 15_7400 Mod 3 relating to the building at 9-19 Elizabeth Street are addressed in Table 6.
Table 6: Non-Aboriginal Heritage conditions of approval for CSSI 15_7400 Mod 3 for the Demolition of 9-19 Elizabeth Street
No. Condition Response
E10 The Proponent must not destroy, modify or otherwise Lendlease will implement temporary physically affect any Heritage item not identified in building fabric protection measures documents referred to in Condition A1. to mitigate risk of damage of heritage fabric to the adjacent heritage item at 50 Martin Place. The project works will not destroy, modify or otherwise physically affect 50 Martin Place. Refer Section 5.3 and Table 9. E13 The Proponent must prepare a Heritage Archival An Archival Recording Report – Recording Report, including photographic recording comprising the recording of the inter- of the heritage items identified in documents referred connecting openings between the to in Condition A1. Archival recording must include buildings at 9-19 Elizabeth Street but not be limited to the following heritage items: and 50 Martin Place – has been (c) Martin Place, between Elizabeth and Castlereagh prepared by TKD Architects on Streets, Sydney; behalf of Macquarie. This archival The archival recording must be undertaken by a record relates to the separate Pre- suitably qualified heritage specialist and prepared in Construction Low Impact Works accordance with NSW Heritage Office’s How to Package and is not included in this Prepare Archival Records of Heritage Items (1998) CHMP as it is not part of the scope and Photographic Recording of Heritage Items Using of works covered by this CHMP. Film or Digital Capture (2006). Within two (2) years of completing the archival recording, or any other later time agreed by the Secretary, the Proponent must submit the Heritage Archival Recording Report to the Department, the OEH, Heritage Council of NSW, Relevant Council(s), relevant local libraries and local historical societies in the respective local government area(s). E14 In addition to the archival recording as required by The exterior of the building at 9-19 Condition E13, the Proponent must, prior to Elizabeth Street has been demolition, undertake external photography of all photographically recorded by Tanner buildings and structures to be demolished, in Kibble Denton Architects on behalf of consultation with and to the standards of the relevant Macquarie, and submitted to City of Council. The recordings must be made available to Sydney. The consultation process the relevant Council. with City of Sydney (as required by Mod 3 (COA) E14) has commenced.. The photographic record does not require DP&E approval, and is
Tanner Kibble Denton Architects November 2018 • Issue D 28 9-19 Elizabeth Street, Sydney – Demolition Works • Construction Heritage Management Plan
No. Condition Response
provided in Appendix D for information.
E15 The Proponent must salvage items of heritage value Partially applicable, to the extent of from heritage listed buildings and structures to be salvaging heritage tiles. Appendix C demolished before demolition, and assess options for contains the approval letter from DPE its sympathetic reuse (including integrated heritage (dated 04/09/18) for low impact displays) on the project or other options for works, including removal and salvage repository, reuse and display. of heritage fabric from 50 Martin Suitable repository locations must be established in Place, as per MCoA 22.1. consultation with Relevant Council(s). Any State listed 9-19 Elizabeth Street is not a listed items or elements suitable for salvage must be heritage item, and contains no items determined in consultation with the Heritage Division of heritage value that are required to of the OEH. be salvaged. Tiles salvaged from the door reveals of the five inter-connecting openings between 9-19 Elizabeth Street and 50 Martin Place are to salvaged for re-use or storage, in accordance with architectural drawings by Tanner Kibble Denton Architects, July 2018. E16 The Proponent must prepare a Salvage Report, Not applicable. 9-19 Elizabeth Street including photographic recording of the heritage items is not a listed heritage item, and has identified for salvage in documents referred to in no items identified for salvage in Condition A1. Condition A1. Tiles to be salvaged from the interconnecting doorways between 50 Martin Place and 9-19 Elizabeth Street are not relevant to this requirement. E17 The Archaeological Assessment Research Design Not applicable. No excavation is Report in the PIR must be implemented before required as part of the demolition commencement scope of works. E18 Before excavation of archaeological management Lendlease will appoint a suitably sites, the Proponent must nominate a suitably qualified Excavation Director prior to qualified Excavation Director the demolition works starting on site. E19 An Unexpected Heritage Finds Procedure must be In the event of the discovery of an prepared unanticipated find, an Unexpected Finds Procedure (UFP) will be undertaken to align with the Sydney Metro Unexpected Finds Procedure (UFP) (Version 1.4). E20 In the event that a Relic is discovered, relevant In the event that a Relic is construction must cease in the affected area discovered, in accordance with the Unexpected Finds Procedure (UFP), relevant construction would cease in the area, an archaeologist would be engaged to formulate and monitor the implementation of an archaeological or heritage
Tanner Kibble Denton Architects November 2018 • Issue D 29 9-19 Elizabeth Street, Sydney – Demolition Works • Construction Heritage Management Plan
No. Condition Response
management plan as a pre-requisite to works recommencing. In the event of a State Significant relic being discovered, the Archaeologist would formulate and implement an ‘Archaeological Relic Management Plan’ as a pre-requisite to works recommencing. E23 The Proponent must take all reasonable steps so as Not applicable. No excavation is not to harm, modify or otherwise impact any required as part of the demolition Aboriginal object associated with the CSSI except as scope of works. authorised by the approval. E24 Before Excavation the Proponent must implement the Not applicable. No excavation is Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Assessment required as part of the demolition scope of works. E25 Where previously Unidentified Aboriginal objects are In the event that a previously discovered during construction of the CSSI Unidentified Aboriginal objects are construction must stop. discovered, in accordance with the Unexpected Finds Procedure (UFP), relevant construction would cease in the area, an Aboriginal heritage consultant would be engaged to formulate and monitor the implementation of an archaeological management plan as a pre-requisite to works recommencing. E22.1 If the modifications to this approval as described in George Phillips of Tanner Kibble (Mod 3) A1 (3) proceed, any internal and external finishes of Denton Architects has been infilled openings between 9-19 Elizabeth Street and submitted to the DP&E and 50 Martin Place must be developed in consultation approved on the 4 September 2018, with a suitably qualified heritage architect, approved as a suitably qualified heritage by the Secretary. architect. The design for the infilling of the openings and their external finishes has been prepared by Tanner Kibble Denton Architects on behalf of Macquarie and submitted to DP&E as part of the Pre- Construction Low Impact works package, which was approved by DP&E on 4 September 2018. The works are currently underway. The works are not covered by this CHMP, but the TKD Architects drawings are included in Appendix C for information.
Tanner Kibble Denton Architects November 2018 • Issue D 30 9-19 Elizabeth Street, Sydney – Demolition Works • Construction Heritage Management Plan
No. Condition Response
E26 This approval does not allow the Proponent to harm, No harm, modification or impact to modify, or otherwise impact human remains human remains will occur during the uncovered during the construction and operation of demolition works that are the subject the CSSI, except in accordance with the Exhumation of this CHMP. Management Plan (Condition E27). E28.1 If the modifications to this approval as described in ARUP are the appointed Structural (Mod 3) A1 (3) proceed, the vibration screening criterion for 50 Engineers for the project. The Martin Place must remain at 7.5mm/s, unless a approach to manage potential detailed investigation of the construction of the vibration impacts at 50 Martin Place building determines that increasing the screening shall be to: criterion to 25mm/s is acceptable. The investigation 1. Identify heritage items must be undertaken by a suitably qualified structural where the 2.5 mm/s peak engineer with experience assessing heritage component particle velocity objective structures and approved by the Secretary and must may be exceeded during specific be supported by evidence to demonstrate the higher construction activities criterion is appropriate. 2. Structural engineering report to be undertaken on identified heritage items, to confirm structural integrity of the building and confirm if item is ‘structurally sound’ 3. If item confirmed as ‘structurally sound’, the screening criteria in Section 6.7.1 of the project Construction Noise and Vibration Management Plan prepared by Renzo Tonin shall be adopted, or 4. If item confirmed as ‘structurally unsound’, the more conservative cosmetic damage objectives of 2.5 mm/s peak component particle velocity would be adopted.
Tanner Kibble Denton Architects November 2018 • Issue D 31 9-19 Elizabeth Street, Sydney – Demolition Works • Construction Heritage Management Plan
7 MITIGATION MEASURES
7.1 Revised Environmental Management Measures for Non-Aboriginal Heritage
The table below (Table 7) outlines the Revised Environmental Management Measures (REMMs) for Non- Aboriginal Heritage applicable to the demolition of 9-19 Elizabeth Street.
Table 7: Revised Environmental Management Measures (REMMs) for Non-Aboriginal Heritage for the Demolition of 9-19 Elizabeth Street.
No. Measure Response Document
NAH1 Archival recording and reporting 50 Martin Place is the only State- Appendix C: includes of the following heritage items significant site which adjoins 9- the approval letter from would be carried out in 19 Elizabeth Street. The five- DPE (dated 04/09/18) accordance with the NSW interconnecting openings for the low impact Heritage Office’s How to Prepare between the two buildings have works, as per MCoA Archival Records of Heritage been archivally recorded. Refer 22.1. The archival Items (1998a), and Photographic Appendix C for the approval record of the Recording of Heritage Items letter from DPE (dated 04/09/18) interconnecting Using Film or Digital Capture for the low impact works, as per openings was prepared (2006): MCoA 22.1. by Tanner Kibble Martin Place, between Elizabeth Denton Architects, July and Castlereagh streets, Sydney This archival record was 2018. prepared by Tanner Kibble Denton Architects in accordance with NSW Heritage Office guidelines ‘How to Prepare Archival Records of Heritage Items (1998) and ‘Photographic Recording of Heritage Items Using Film or Digital Capture (2006), in satisfaction of Condition of Approval for CSSI_7400 Mod 3 (COA) E13.
The photographic record of the The photographic exterior of 9-19 Elizabeth Street record of the exterior of was prepared by Tanner Kibble 9-19 Elizabeth Street Denton Architects, July 2018, in was prepared by satisfaction of Condition of Tanner Kibble Denton Approval for CSSI 15_7400 Mod Architects, July 2018, 3 (COA) E14 and submitted to included in Appendix D City of Sydney. The photographic for information. record does not require DP&E approval, and is provided as Appendix D for information.
Tanner Kibble Denton Architects November 2018 • Issue D 32 9-19 Elizabeth Street, Sydney – Demolition Works • Construction Heritage Management Plan
No. Measure Response Document
NAH2 The archaeological research Not applicable. No excavation is NA design would be implemented. required as part of the demolition Significant archaeological scope of works. findings would be considered for inclusion in heritage interpretation (as per NAH8) for the project and be developed in consultation with the relevant local council. NAH3 An Exhumation Policy and The Unexpected Finds Appendix A Guideline would be prepared and Procedure would be implemented. It would be implemented in the very unlikely developed in accordance with event that any of any human the Guidelines for Management skeletal remains being found. of Human Skeletal Remains (NSW Heritage Office, 1998b) and NSW Health. Policy Directive - Exhumation of human remains (December, 2013). It would be prepared in consultation with NSW Heritage Office and NSW Health. NAH4 The method for the demolition of This mitigation measure is The demolition existing buildings and / or applicable to 50 Martin Place, as methodology described structures at Chatswood dive a heritage item adjacent to the in Section 1.4 of this site, Victoria Cross Station, demolition of the building at 9-19 report has been Martin Place Station, Pitt Street Elizabeth Street. developed to minimise Station, Central Station and direct and indirect Waterloo Station would be impacts to 50 Martin developed to minimise direct and Place. Possible adverse indirect impacts to adjacent and impacts on 50 Martin / or adjoining heritage items. Place as a result of the demolition of the adjacent 9-19 Elizabeth Street building, and the mitigation and control measures that will be adopted before and during the works are included in Table 9 of this report.
Tanner Kibble Denton Architects November 2018 • Issue D 33 9-19 Elizabeth Street, Sydney – Demolition Works • Construction Heritage Management Plan
No. Measure Response Document
NAH6 Prior to total or partial demolition This mitigation measure is also Refer Section 5.3 of heritage items at Victoria applicable to demolition works at (protection of heritage Cross and Martin Place stations, 50 Martin Place. Tiles salvaged fabric). heritage fabric for salvage would from the door reveals of the five Architectural drawings be identified and reuse inter-connecting openings by Tanner Kibble opportunities for salvaged fabric between 9-19 Elizabeth Street Denton Architects, July considered. This would include and 50 Martin Place are to 2018 contained in salvage and reuse of heritage salvaged for re-use or storage. Appendix C for tiles to be impacted at Martin This CHMP covers ‘construction’ information. Place Station. works only, not ‘low impact Appendix C: includes works’ as defined by the CCSI the approval letter from approval. DPE (dated 04/09/18) This CHMP has been developed for the low impact for demolition works only. works, as per MCoA Options for reuse and display of 22.1. heritage fabric is to be updated as detailed design progresses, and included in the relevant design documentation. However, Macquarie has a secure repository for removed heritage fabric located in Shelley Street, Sydney and salvaged material will be stored there until it is required for reuse or display.
NAH7 The project design would be This mitigation measure is also Architectural drawings sympathetic to heritage items applicable to the works to 50 by Tanner Kibble and, where reasonable and Martin Place. The internal and Denton Architects, July feasible, minimise impacts to the external finishes of the infilled 2018. setting of heritage items. The openings between 9-19 Elizabeth detailed design for Martin Place Street and 50 Martin Place have Station and Central Station been developed in conjunction would be developed with input with a heritage architect. from a heritage architect.
Tanner Kibble Denton Architects November 2018 • Issue D 34 9-19 Elizabeth Street, Sydney – Demolition Works • Construction Heritage Management Plan
No. Measure Response Document
NAH11 Except for heritage significant This mitigation measure is also Refer Section 1.5, elements affected by the project, applicable to the works to 50 Section 7.3, and direct impact on other heritage Martin Place. Protective Table 9. significant elements forming part measures are to be implemented Pre-construction Low of the following items would be to mitigate potential direct Impact Works avoided: impacts on the historic fabric of application prepared by – The existing Martin Place 50 Martin Place. Tanner Kibble Denton Station Architects, July 2018, included Architectural drawings by Tanner Kibble Denton Architects, July 2018. The works are not covered by this CHMP, but the TKD Architects drawings are included in Appendix C for information.
7.2 Archaeology
As noted in Section 1.2 and Table 6, no archaeological excavations are associated with the demolition of the building at 9-19 Elizabeth Street. The base slab of this building is not to be removed as part of the building demolition works and no archaeological investigations are to be undertaken as part of these demolition works. However, LL will appoint an excavation director as per condition E18, prior to the demolition works starting on site.
In the event of an unanticipated heritage find, the Sydney Metro Unexpected Finds Procedure (UFP) (Version 1.4) (refer to Appendix A) will be implemented. Accordingly, in the event of an unexpected heritage find during the demolition of 9-19 Elizabeth Street, the following procedure will apply. Full details are provided in Appendix A;
– Stop work, protect item and inform the Lendlease Site Manager and/or Site Supervisor. – Establish a ‘no-go zone’ around the item. Use high visibility fencing, where practical. No work is to be undertaken within this zone until further investigations are completed and, if required, appropriate approvals are obtained. Inform all site personnel about the no-go zone. – Contact the Excavation Director. – Archaeologist and/or an Aboriginal heritage consultant to prepare preliminary assessment and recording of the find. – Archaeologist and/or an Aboriginal heritage consultant to notify the regulator, if required. – Implement archaeological or heritage management plan, if required. – Resume work.
7.3 Management Structures and Mitigation Measures
Critical State Significant Infrastructure Approval CSSI 15_7400 MOD 3 Conditions of Approval C4 requires that the CEMP sub-plans (including this CHMP) must state how management structures and mitigation measures identified in the EIS as amended by the PIR, for potential impacts on heritage items are to be implemented. 50 Martin Place is the only State-significant site which adjoins 9-19 Elizabeth Street.
Tanner Kibble Denton Architects November 2018 • Issue D 35 9-19 Elizabeth Street, Sydney – Demolition Works • Construction Heritage Management Plan
The processes for meeting the requirements set out in the CoA for 50 Martin Place and the Responsible Key Contributors are set out in following table (Table 8).
Table 8: Processes for Meeting the Requirements Set Out in the CoA for 50 Martin Place and the Responsible Key Contributors
Process Responsible Key Contributors (from CHMP Table 5)
Schedule weekly/fortnightly meetings with Program Director, Project Manager, Site representatives of Macquarie Bank to discuss Supervisor, Contractor, Heritage Architect proposed demolition methodology and program
Develop joint solutions to specific areas of Program Director, Project Manager, Site concern to either party Supervisor, Contractor, Heritage Architect
Provide information regarding predicted noise and Acoustic Consultant, Structural Engineer vibration levels
Undertake a detailed condition survey of the Project Manager, Contractor building
Implement the noise and vibration monitoring Project Manager, Site Supervisor, Contractor, program as set out in the Construction Noise and Acoustic Consultant, Structural Engineer. Vibration Management Plan prepared by Renzo Tonin.
Prepare and issue compliance records and reports Environmental Manager, Site supervisor (as listed in Table 10)
In addition, the following table (Table 9) defines the possible effect on 50 Martin Place as a result of the demolition of the adjacent 9-19 Elizabeth Street building, and the mitigation and control measures that will be adopted before and during the works.
Tanner Kibble Denton Architects November 2018 • Issue D 36 9-19 Elizabeth Street, Sydney – Demolition Works • Construction Heritage Management Plan
Table 9: Environmental Risks and Control Measures for the Demolition of 9-19 Elizabeth Street
Environmental Risk Mitigation Measure Control Measure Aspect
Noise Receivers in 50 In accordance with CoA E35, Noise caused by the works Martin Place have alternative methods of will not exceed the specified potential to be demolition have been reviewed limits in the CNVMP by Renzo impacted by with a view to adopting Tonin. structure-borne methods that minimise noise during impacts on sensitive receivers. Attended and real time noise demolition works It is accordingly proposed to monitoring will be undertaken as the buildings use a combination of mainly to verify that noise levels are share a common pulverising, however consistent with the predicted boundary with air- sometimes hydraulic levels in the CNVIS, and to gap separation hammering to demolish the determine whether any between adjacent reinforced concrete walls, additional mitigation or walls. slabs, stairs and the like. Saw management measures are cutting may be undertaken to required (see section 9.1 of remove the boundary wall the CNVMP). adjacent 50 Martin Place (from CNVMP by Renzo Tonin). Lendlease will seek the advice of a Heritage Engineer on methods and locations for installing equipment used for vibration, movement and noise monitoring of heritage-listed structures.
Vibration For demolition Per Project Planning Approval A combination of attended works, vibration Condition 28.1, a vibration and unattended vibration levels are screening criterion of 7.5mm/s monitoring is proposed at 50 dependent on the is applicable at 50 Martin Martin Place to verify that floor level where Place. Subject to further vibration levels remain in vibration- detailed assessment by a compliance with the structural generating works suitably qualified structural damage screening criterion, are undertaken. engineer with experience where plant needs to operate The air gap assessing heritage structures, within the minimum working between the two this criterion could potentially distance identified in CNVIS buildings has be increased to 25 mm/s. In Table 7.1. If monitoring been exposed, so accordance with CoA E35, identifies that vibration is likely there is no alternative methods of to be above the cosmetic structural demolition have been reviewed damage screening criterion, a connection (other with a view to adopting different construction method than via the methods that minimise with lower source vibration ground), so that impacts on sensitive receivers. levels will be considered. vibration levels will It is accordingly proposed to be highest in use a combination of mainly
Tanner Kibble Denton Architects November 2018 • Issue D 37 9-19 Elizabeth Street, Sydney – Demolition Works • Construction Heritage Management Plan
Environmental Risk Mitigation Measure Control Measure Aspect
adjacent buildings pulverising, however when demolition sometimes hydraulic works are hammering to demolish the undertaken on the reinforced concrete walls, lower floors. slabs, stairs and the like. Saw cutting may be undertaken to remove the boundary wall adjacent 50 Martin Place (from CNVPMP by Renzo Tonin). Lendlease will seek the advice of a Heritage Engineer on methods and locations for installing equipment used for vibration, movement and noise monitoring of heritage-listed structures.
Dust Demolition works Develop Air Quality Dust generation not to causing high dust Management Procedure. exceed Air Quality activity in close Inductions and toolbox training Management Procedure. proximity to on Dust and Air Quality commercial Management. Where excessive dust is premises, and Provide dust mitigation generated work to stop dust deposition at measures through water immediately, dust control sensitive sprays/misting. methods modified and receivers, Use of water carts during dry extended to meet impact. weather on haulage roads and Generation of excavations/batters. fugitive dust from Install dust controls Load Out / immediately and continually Loading vehicles, through the project. and Vehicle / Erosion and Sediment Control plant movement. Plans approved before works commence. Controls are then reviewed for maintenance. Install water hose or hand held hoses or sprinklers to suppress dust at source point. Check taps for leaks, check hoses for leaks and turn water off overnight. Loads will be wet down prior to dropping. Cease loading in windy conditions. Stage Works such as demolishing perimeter walls last to minimise dust.
Tanner Kibble Denton Architects November 2018 • Issue D 38 9-19 Elizabeth Street, Sydney – Demolition Works • Construction Heritage Management Plan
Environmental Risk Mitigation Measure Control Measure Aspect
Shade cloth (Metromesh) will be installed to encapsulate perimeter scaffolding as required. Fine water mist to be sprayed periodically onto shade cloth to prevent dust exposure beyond site boundaries (where required).
Weather- Weather-tightness Develop methodology for On discovery of proofing of 50 Martin Place demolition of boundary wall compromised integrity of exposed walls compromised by with Heritage Architect and boundary wall, works in the after demolition demolition of Structural Engineer. area to cease and Heritage of the adjacent adjacent building, Architect and Structural building when adjacent Engineer to attend site to wall is demolished inspect, and provide - revealing methodology for rectification. defective boundary wall (damaged render or penetrations), - demolition works damaging the boundary wall.
Traffic Traffic disruptions Mitigation measures are Site demolition related traffic and controls, detailed in the Construction is to comply with the Temporary Traffic Management Plan – Construction Traffic detours, Demolition (CTMP). The CTMP Management Plan – Heavy vehicle for the project has been Demolition (CTMP). movement control approved by all relevant authorities including the City of Sydney, RMS, and The Traffic Co-ordination Office
Tanner Kibble Denton Architects November 2018 • Issue D 39 9-19 Elizabeth Street, Sydney – Demolition Works • Construction Heritage Management Plan
8 COMPLIANCE RECORDS AND MANAGEMENT
The following table (Table 10) lists the compliance records and reports that will be completed throughout construction works.
Table 10: compliance records and reports
Aspect Report Information Frequency Responsibility
Noise and Noise and Continuous, real- Monthly report Environment time noise and Vibration Vibration vibration monitoring issued to Manager Monitoring Monitoring data summary - Sydney Metro, Report placed at 50 Martin Environmental Place. Representative Confirm vibration occurrence at State and Acoustic Heritage Listed 50 Advisor. Martin Place and compliance with vibration limits set by MCoA E28 and E28.1. MCoA Pre- Details compliance Prior to Environment with all conditions of Compliance Construction approval, including commencement Manager Compliance heritage of construction, Report requirements, endorsed by required to be Environmental discharged prior to commencement of Representative construction. and issued to DPE.
Ongoing Construction Details ongoing Lendlease to Environment compliance with Project Compliance conditions of prepare relevant Manager Compliance Reports approval, including information and heritage issue to Sydney requirements, during Metro to include construction delivery. in their Sydney Metro City and Southwest construction compliance reports, submitted to DPE six monthly.
Tanner Kibble Denton Architects November 2018 • Issue D 40 9-19 Elizabeth Street, Sydney – Demolition Works • Construction Heritage Management Plan
Aspect Report Information Frequency Responsibility
Site Site Site monitoring of Weekly Environment construction works Compliance Inspections as they progress. Manager Confirm any required heritage exclusion zones are in place and adhered too. Site Supervisor Monitor for physical risk/impact to heritage items.
Tanner Kibble Denton Architects November 2018 • Issue D 41 9-19 Elizabeth Street, Sydney – Demolition Works • Construction Heritage Management Plan
APPENDIX A SYDNEY METRO UNEXPECTED FINDS PROCEDURE VERSION 1.4
Tanner Kibble Denton Architects November 2018 • Issue D A-1
Sydney Metro Unexpected Heritage Finds Procedure
Supporting Document – Applicable to:
Status:
Division:
Version: 1.4
Date of issue: 19/04/2018
Effective date:
Review date: 22/03/2019
Document owner:
Security classification:
Sydney Metro Unexpected Heritage Finds Procedure
Document History
Version Date of approval Doc. Control no. Notes 1.1 Incorporates ER comments 21/06/17 1.2 Amends p13 step 8 reference to s146 added 1.3 Incorporates Planning Mods 1-4 including amended CoA E20 1.4 Incorporates ER comments 21/03/18
Table of Contents 1. Purpose ...... 3 2. Scope ...... 4 3. Definitions ...... 6 4. Accountabilities ...... 7 5. Types of unexpected heritage items and corresponding statutory protections 7 5.1. Aboriginal objects ...... 7 5.2. Historic heritage items ...... 8 5.2.1. Archaeological relics ...... 8 5.2.2. Other historic items ...... 9 5.3. Human skeletal remains ...... 9 6. Legislative Requirements ...... 10 7. Unexpected heritage finds protocol ...... 12 7.1. What is an unexpected heritage find? ...... 12 7.2. Managing unexpected heritage finds ...... 13 8. Responsibilities ...... 22 9. Seeking advice ...... 23 10. Related documents and references ...... 23 11. List of appendices ...... 23
TfNSW Unexpected Finds Procedure v1.4 19.04.18
© TfNSW 2015 Page 2 of 52
Sydney Metro Unexpected Heritage Finds Procedure
1. Purpose This procedure is applicable only to the Sydney Metro Critical State Significant Infrastructure Planning Approval (CSSI 15_7400) including the following planning approval modifications:
Modification 1- Victoria Cross Substation and Artarmon Substation which involves relocation of the Victoria Cross northern services building from 194-196A Miller Street to 50 McLaren Street together with inclusion of a new station entrance at this location referred to as Victoria Cross North. 52 McLaren Street would also be used to support construction of these works. The modification also involves the relocation of the substation at Artarmon from Butchers Lane to 98 – 104 Reserve Road. This modification application was approved on 18 October 2017;
• Modification 2- Central Walk which involves additional works at Central Railway Station including construction of a new eastern concourse, a new eastern entry, and upgrades to suburban platforms. This modification application was approved on 21 December 2017;
• Modification 3- Martin Place Metro Station which involves changes to the Sydney Metro Martin Place Station to align with the Unsolicited Proposal by Macquarie Group Limited (Macquarie) for the development of the station precinct. The proposed modification involves a larger reconfigured station layout, provision of a new unpaid concourse link and retention of the existing MLC pedestrian link and works to connect into the Sydney Metro Martin Place Station. It is noted that if the Macquarie proposal does not proceed, the modification (if approved) would be surrendered. This modification application was approved on 22 March 2018; and • Modification 4- Sydenham Station and Metro Train Facility which incorporated Sydenham Station and precinct works, the Sydney Metro Trains Facility South, works to Sydney Water’s Sydenham Pit and Drainage Pumping Station and ancillary infrastructure and track and signalling works into the approved project. This modification application was approved on 13 December 2017
This procedure has been developed in response to Condition of Approval (CoA) E19, that requires Sydney Metro City & Southwest Program to provide a method for managing unexpected heritage items (both Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal) that are discovered during construction. An ‘unexpected heritage find’ can be defined as any unanticipated archaeological discovery, that has not been previously assessed or is not covered by an existing approval under the Heritage Act 1977 (Heritage Act) or National Parks and Wildlife Act 1974 (NPW Act). In NSW, there are strict laws to protect and manage heritage objects and relics. As a result, appropriate heritage management measures need to be implemented to minimise impacts on heritage values; ensure compliance with relevant heritage notification and other obligations; and to minimise the risk of penalties to individuals, TfNSW and its contractors. This procedure includes TfNSW’s heritage notification obligations under the Heritage Act, NPW
TfNSW Unexpected Finds Procedure v1.4 19.04.18
© TfNSW 2015 Page 3 of 52
Sydney Metro Unexpected Heritage Finds Procedure
Act and the Coroner’s Act 2009 and the specific requirements of the conditions of approval(CoA) issued by NSW Department of Planning and Environment for CSSI 15-7400. Note that a Contractor may create their own Unexpected Finds Procedure or modify this document, however its use will be subject to compliance with the following:- CSSI CoA E17 requires consultation with the Heritage Council of NSW (or its delegate) CSSI CoA E19 Prior approval from the nominated Excavation Director, as required under CSSI CoA E18 Prior approval from the Environmental Representative, CSSI CoA A24
Prior approval from Sydney Metro. It should be noted that this procedure must be read in conjunction with the relevant CCSI conditionals of approval, the contract documents and other plans and procedures developed by the contractor during the delivery of the works. Legislation that does not apply The following authorisations are not required for Sydney Metro approved Critical State significant infrastructure (and accordingly the provisions of any Act that prohibit an activity without such an authority do not apply):
Division 8 of Part 6 of the Heritage Act 1977 does not apply to prevent or interfere with the carrying out of approved State significant infrastructure. An approval under Part 4, or an excavation permit under section 139, of the Heritage Act 1977, An Aboriginal heritage impact permit under section 90 of the National Parks and Wildlife Act 1974,
This document provides relevant background information in Section 3, followed by the technical procedure in Sections 6 and 7. Associated guidance referred to in the procedure can be found in Appendices A-H. 2. Scope Despite appropriate and adequate investigation, unexpected heritage items may still be discovered during maintenance and construction works on a Sydney Metro site. When this happens, this procedure must be followed. This procedure provides direction on when to stop work, where to seek technical advice and how to notify the regulator, if required.
TfNSW Unexpected Finds Procedure v1.4 19.04.18
© TfNSW 2015 Page 4 of 52
Sydney Metro Unexpected Heritage Finds Procedure
This procedure applies to construction activities for the Sydney Metro Program as approved under Section 115ZB of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 for Critical State Significant Infrastructure, Application No. SSI 15-7400.
This procedure applies to: the discovery of any unexpected heritage item, relic or object, where the find is not anticipated in the Archaeological Assessment Design Report (AARD) or Archaeological Method Statements (AMS) that are prepared prior to commencement of excavation. This procedure must be followed by all Sydney Metro staff, contractors, subcontractors or any person undertaking works for Sydney Metro. It includes references to some of the relevant legislative and regulatory requirements, but is not intended to replace them with the exception S139 of the NSW Heritage Act 1977 This procedure does not apply to: The discovery and disturbance of heritage items as a result of investigations being undertaken in accordance with the Office of Environment and Heritage’s (OEH) Code of Practice for Archaeological Investigations of Aboriginal Objects in NSW 20101; an Aboriginal Heritage Impact Permit (AHIP) issued under the NPW Act; or an approval issued under the Heritage Act. the discovery and disturbance of heritage items as a result of construction related activities, where the disturbance is permissible in accordance with an AHIP; or an approval issued under the Heritage Act; All new Construction Environment Management Plans (CEMPs) must make reference to and/or include this procedure (included as a heritage sub-plan, refer to CSSI CoA C6(g)). Note that this procedure does not supersede the requirements of CSSI CoA CSSI CoA E10 and E26: E10 The Proponent must not destroy, modify or otherwise physically affect any Heritage item not identified in documents referred to in CoA A 1. E26 This approval does not allow the Proponent to harm, modify, or otherwise impact human remains uncovered during the construction and operation of the CSSI, except in accordance with the Exhumation Management Plan (CoA E27).
1 An act carried out in accordance with the Code of Practice for Archaeological Investigation of Aboriginal Objects in NSW as published by the Department in the Gazette on 24 September 2010 is excluded from the definition of harm an object or place in section 5 (1) of the NPW Act.
TfNSW Unexpected Finds Procedure v1.4 19.04.18
© TfNSW 2015 Page 5 of 52
Sydney Metro Unexpected Heritage Finds Procedure
3. Definitions All terminology in this procedure is taken to mean the generally accepted or dictionary definition with the exception of the following terms which have a specifically defined meaning:
Term Meaning
AHIP Aboriginal Heritage Impact Permit
Aboriginal object An Aboriginal object is any deposit, object or material evidence (not being a handicraft made for sale) relating to the Aboriginal habitation of the area, being habitation before or concurrent with (or both) the occupation of that area by persons of non-Aboriginal extraction, and includes Aboriginal remains. An Aboriginal object may include a shell midden, stone tools, bones, rock art, Aboriginal-built fences and stockyards, scarred trees and the remains of fringe camps.
CEMP Construction Environmental Management Plan
CoA Conditions of Approval
CSSI Critical State Significant Infrastructure
EP&A Act NSW Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979
Heritage Act NSW Heritage Act 1977
NPW Act NSW National Parks and Wildlife Act 1974
OEH Office of Environment and Heritage
Relic (non- A relic means any deposit, artefact, object or material evidence that: Aboriginal heritage) a) relates to the settlement of the area that comprises NSW, not being Aboriginal settlement, and b) is of State significance. A relic may include items such as bottles, utensils, remnants of clothing, crockery, personal effects, tools, machinery and domestic or industrial refuse. Note that Modification 2 amends the previous definition of a relic, being the same as described in the NSW Heritage Act 1977, by deleting all reference to local heritage significance. For the purpose managing relics under the CSSI 15_7400 Planning Approval CoA E20 applies to relics of State significance only.
TfNSW Transport for New South Wales
TfNSW Unexpected Finds Procedure v1.4 19.04.18
© TfNSW 2015 Page 6 of 52
Sydney Metro Unexpected Heritage Finds Procedure
Term Meaning
Work (non- Archaeological features such as historic utilities or buried infrastructure that Aboriginal heritage) provide evidence of prior occupations such as former rail or tram tracks, timber sleepers, kerbing, historic road pavement, fences, culverts, historic pavement, buried retaining walls, cisterns, conduits, sheds or building foundations, but are subject to specific assessment by the Excavation Director 4. Accountabilities 5. Types of unexpected heritage items and corresponding statutory protections The roles of project, field and environmental personnel (including construction contractors) are critical to the early identification and protection of unexpected heritage items. Appendix A illustrates the wide range of heritage discoveries found on transport infrastructure projects and provides a useful photographic guide. Subsequent to confirmation of a heritage discovery it must then be identified and assessed by Excavation Director as required under CSSI CoA E20. An ‘unexpected heritage item’ means any unanticipated discovery of an actual or potential heritage item, for which Sydney Metro (refer to CSSI CoA 2 E10 and E26) does not have approval to disturb and/or have an existing management process in place. These discoveries are categorised as either: (a) Aboriginal objects (b) historic (non-Aboriginal) heritage items (c) human skeletal remains. The relevant legislation that applies to each of these categories is described below and is also addressed in the Sydney Metro Exhumation Management Plan (refer to CSSI CoA E26 and E27). 5.1. Aboriginal objects The NPW Act protects Aboriginal objects which are defined as: “any deposit, object or material evidence (not being a handicraft made for sale) relating to the Aboriginal habitation of the area that comprises New South Wales,
2 Disturbance is considered to be any physical interference with the item that results in it being destroyed, defaced, damaged, harmed, impacted or altered in any way (this includes archaeological investigation activities).
TfNSW Unexpected Finds Procedure v1.4 19.04.18
© TfNSW 2015 Page 7 of 52
Sydney Metro Unexpected Heritage Finds Procedure
being habitation before or concurrent with (or both) the occupation of that area by persons of non Aboriginal extraction, and includes Aboriginal remains”3. Examples of Aboriginal objects include stone tool artefacts, shell middens, axe grinding grooves, pigment or engraved rock art, burials and scarred trees.
IMPORTANT! All Aboriginal objects, regardless of significance, are protected under law. If any impact is expected to an Aboriginal object, an AHIP is usually required from OEH4. Also, when a person becomes aware of an Aboriginal object they must notify the Director- General of OEH about its location5. Assistance on how to do this is provided in Section 7 (Step 5). CSSI CoA E23, E24 and E25 for management of Aboriginal Heritage Applies to the Sydney Metro Chatswood to Sydenham Project 5.2. Historic heritage items Historic (non-Aboriginal) heritage items may include: archaeological ‘relics’ other historic items (i.e. works, structures, buildings or movable objects). 5.2.1. Archaeological relics The Heritage Act protects relics which are defined as: “any deposit, artefact, object or material evidence that relates to the settlement of the area that comprises NSW, not being Aboriginal settlement; and is of State or local heritage significance”6. Changes to CoA E20 included within Planning Modification 1 (Oct 2017) deleted reference local heritage significance, so that E20 applies to relics of State significance only. Relics are archaeological items of local or state significance which may relate to past domestic, industrial or agricultural activities in NSW, and can include bottles, remnants of clothing, pottery, building materials and general refuse.
3 Section 5(1) NPW Act. 4 Refer to CSSI CoA E23 & E25. 5 This is required under section 89(A) of the NPW Act and applies to all TfNSW projects. 6 Section 4(1) Heritage Act.
TfNSW Unexpected Finds Procedure v1.4 19.04.18
© TfNSW 2015 Page 8 of 52
Sydney Metro Unexpected Heritage Finds Procedure
Construction in the vicinity of a relic, of State significance, must not recommence until the requirements of the ARMP have been implemented, in consultation with the Excavation Director. The Sydney Metro must notify the Secretary of the Department of Environment & Planning in writing of the outcome of consultation with the Heritage Council of NSW, refer to CSSI CoA E20.
IMPORTANT! All relics are subject to statutory controls and protections. If a relic is likely to be disturbed, a heritage approval is usually required from the NSW Heritage Council7. Also, when a person discovers a relic they must notify the NSW Heritage Council of its location8. Advice on how to do this for works under CSSI 15_7400 is provided in Section 7 (Step 5).
5.2.2. Other historic items Some historic heritage items are not considered to be ‘relics’; but are instead referred to as works, buildings, structures or movable objects. Examples of these items that may be encountered include culverts, historic pavements, retaining walls, tramlines, rail tracks, timber sleepers, cisterns, fences, sheds, buildings and conduits. Although an approval under the Heritage Act may not be required to disturb these items, their discovery must be managed in accordance with this procedure. As a general rule, an archaeological relic requires discovery or examination through the act of excavation. An archaeological excavation permit under section 140 of the Heritage Act is required to do this. In contrast, ‘other historic items’ either exist above the ground surface (e.g. a shed), or they are designed to operate and exist beneath the ground surface (e.g. a culvert). Despite this difference, it should be remembered that relics can often be associated with ‘other heritage items’, such as archaeological deposits within cisterns and underfloor deposits beneath buildings. 5.3. Human skeletal remains Refer to Sydney Metro Project Exhumation Management Plan
7Refer to CSSI CoA E20, . 8 This is required under section 146 of the Heritage Act and applies to all TfNSW projects however also refer to foot note 8.
TfNSW Unexpected Finds Procedure v1.4 19.04.18
© TfNSW 2015 Page 9 of 52
Sydney Metro Unexpected Heritage Finds Procedure
Human skeletal remains can be identified as either an Aboriginal object or non-Aboriginal relic depending on ancestry of the individual (Aboriginal or non-Aboriginal) and burial context (archaeological or non-archaeological). Remains are considered to be archaeological when the time elapsed since death is suspected of being 100 years or more. Depending on ancestry and context, different legislation applies. As a simple example, a pre-European settlement archaeological Aboriginal burial would be protected under the NPW Act, while a historic (non-Aboriginal) archaeological burial within a cemetery would be protected under the Heritage Act. For a non-Aboriginal archaeological burial, the relevant heritage approval and notification requirement described in Section 3.1 would apply. In addition to the NPW Act, finding Aboriginal human remains also triggers notification requirements to the Commonwealth Minister for the Environment under section 20(1) of the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Heritage Protection Act 1984 (Commonwealth). IMPORTANT! All human skeletal remains are subject to statutory controls and protections.
All bones must be treated as potential human skeletal remains and work around them must stop while they are protected and investigated urgently.
However, where it is suspected that less than 100 years has elapsed since death, the human skeletal remains come under the jurisdiction of the State Coroner and the Coroners Act 2009 (NSW). Such a case would be considered a ‘reportable death’ and under legal notification obligations set out in section 35(2); a person must report the death to a police officer, a coroner or an assistant coroner as soon as possible. This applies to all human remains less 9 than 100 years old regardless of ancestry (i.e. both Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal remains). Public health controls may also apply. Guidance on what to do when suspected human remains are found is provided in Appendix E. 6. Legislative Requirements Table 1 identifies some of the relevant legislation/regulations for the protection of heritage and the management of unexpected heritage finds in NSW. It should be noted that significant penalties exist for breaches of the listed legislation as a result of actions that relate to unauthorised impacts on heritage items. Further, it is noted that heritage that has been
9 Under section 19 of the Coroners Act 2009, the coroner has no jurisdiction to conduct an inquest into reportable death unless it appears to the coroner that (or that there is reasonable cause to suspect that) the death or suspected death occurred within the last 100 years.
TfNSW Unexpected Finds Procedure v1.4 19.04.18
© TfNSW 2015 Page 10 of 52
Sydney Metro Unexpected Heritage Finds Procedure
assessed and is being managed in accordance with relevant statutory approvals(s) is exempt from these offences. To avoid breaches of legislation, it is important that Sydney Metro and its contractors are aware of their statutory obligations under relevant legislation and that appropriate control measures are in place to ensure that unexpected heritage items are appropriately managed during construction. Contractors/Alliances will need to ensure that they undertake their own due diligence to identify any other legislative requirements that may apply for a given project. CSSI CoA E10 applies to unexpected finds, so that all relevant legislation will apply to heritage items not identified in documents referred to CoA A1. Table 1 Legislation and guidelines for management of unexpected heritage finds
Relevant Requirement Objectives and offences
Environmental Planning Section 115ZB Giving of approval by Minister to carry out a project. and Assessment Act 1979 (EP&A Act)
Environmental Planning Requires heritage to be considered within the environmental impact and Assessment Act assessment of projects. 1979 (EP&A Act) This guideline is based on the premise that an appropriate level of Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal cultural heritage assessment and investigations and mitigation have already been undertaken under the relevant legislation, including the EP&A Act, during the assessment and determination process. It also assumes that appropriate mitigation measures have been included in the conditions of any approval.
Heritage Act 1977 The Heritage Act provides for the care, protection and management of (Heritage Act) heritage items in NSW. Under section 139, it is an offence to disturb or excavate any land knowing or having reasonable cause to suspect that the disturbance or excavation will or is likely to result in a relic being discovered, exposed, moved, damaged or destroyed, unless the disturbance or excavation is carried out in accordance with an excavation permit issued by the Heritage Division of the OEH. Under the Act, a relic is defined as: ‘any deposit, artefact, object or material evidence that: (a) relates to the settlement of the area that comprises New South Wales, not being Aboriginal settlement, and (b) is of State or local heritage significance.’ A person must notify the Heritage Division of OEH, if a person is aware or believes that they have discovered or located a relic (section 146). Penalties for offences under the Heritage Act can include six months imprisonment and/or a fine of up to $1.1million.
TfNSW Unexpected Finds Procedure v1.4 19.04.18
© TfNSW 2015 Page 11 of 52
Sydney Metro Unexpected Heritage Finds Procedure
Relevant Requirement Objectives and offences
National Parks and The NPW Act provides the basis for the care, protection and Wildlife Act 1974 (NPW management of Aboriginal objects and places in NSW. Act) An Aboriginal object is defined as: ‘any deposit, object or material evidence (not being a handicraft made for sale) relating to the Aboriginal habitation of the area that comprises New South Wales, being habitation before or concurrent with (or both) the occupation of that area by persons of non-Aboriginal extraction, and includes Aboriginal remains’. An ‘Aboriginal place’ is an area declared by the Minister administering the Act to be of special significance with respect to Aboriginal culture. An Aboriginal place does not have to contain physical evidence of occupation (such as Aboriginal objects). Under section 87 of the Act, it is an offence to harm or desecrate an Aboriginal object or place. There are strict liability offences. An offence cannot be upheld where the harm or desecration was authorised by an AHIP and the permit’s conditions were not contravened. Defences and exemptions to the offence of harming an Aboriginal object or Aboriginal place are provided in section 87, 87A and 87B of the Act. A person must notify OEH if a person is aware of the location of an Aboriginal object. Penalties for some of the offences can include two years imprisonment and/or up to $550,000 (for individuals), and a maximum penalty of $1.1 million (for corporations).
7. Unexpected heritage finds protocol 7.1. What is an unexpected heritage find? An ‘unexpected heritage find’ can be defined as any unanticipated archaeological discovery that has not been identified during a previous assessment or is not covered by an existing permit under the Heritage Act. The find may have potential cultural heritage value, which may require some type of statutory cultural heritage permit or notification if any interference of the heritage item is proposed or anticipated. The range of potential archaeological discoveries can include but are not limited to: remains of rail infrastructure including buildings, footings, stations, signal boxes, rail lines, bridges and culverts remains of other infrastructure including sandstone or brick buildings, wells, cisterns, drainage services, conduits, old kerbing and pavement, former road surfaces, timber and stone culverts, bridge footings and retaining walls
TfNSW Unexpected Finds Procedure v1.4 19.04.18
© TfNSW 2015 Page 12 of 52
Sydney Metro Unexpected Heritage Finds Procedure
artefact scatters including clustering of broken and complete bottles, glass, ceramics, animal bones and clay pipes Archaeological human skeletal remains. 7.2. Managing unexpected heritage finds In the event that an unexpected heritage find (the find) is encountered on a Sydney Metro site, the flowchart in Figure 1 must be followed. There are eight steps in the procedure. These steps are summarised in Figure 1 and explained in detail in Table 2 . Figure 1 Overview of steps to be undertaken on the discovery of an unexpected heritage item
IMPORTANT! Sydney Metro may have approval to impact on certain heritage items during construction. If you think that you may have discovered a heritage item and you are unsure whether an approval is in place or not, STOP works and follow this procedure.
TfNSW Unexpected Finds Procedure v1.4 19.04.18
© TfNSW 2015 Page 13 of 52
Sydney Metro Unexpected Heritage Finds Procedure
Table 2 Specific tasks to be implemented following the discovery of an unexpected heritage item
Step Task Responsibility Guidance and tools 1 Stop work, protect item and inform the Excavation Director
1.1 Stop all work in the immediate area of the item and notify the Project Manager Contractor/ Supervisor Appendix A (Identifying Unexpected Heritage items) 1.2 Establish a ‘no-go zone’ around the item. Use high visibility fencing, where practical. No Project Manager/ work is to be undertaken within this zone until further investigations are completed and, if Contractor/ Supervisor required, appropriate approvals are obtained. Inform all site personnel about the no-go zone. 1.3 Inspect, document and photograph the item. Excavation Director Appendix B (Unexpected Heritage Item Recording Form) Appendix C (Photographing Unexpected Heritage items) 1.4 Is the item likely to be bone? Excavation Director Appendix D If yes, follow the steps in Appendix D – ‘Uncovering bones’. Where it is obvious that the (Uncovering Bones) bones are human remains, you must notify the local police by telephone immediately. They may take command of all or part of the site. If no, proceed to next step.
TfNSW Unexpected Finds Procedure v1.4 19.04.18
© TfNSW 2015 Page 14 of 52
Sydney Metro Unexpected Heritage Finds Procedure
Step Task Responsibility Guidance and tools 1.5 Inform the Excavation Director of the item and provide as much information as possible, including photos and completed form (Appendix B). Where the project has an Environmental Representative (ER), the ER should be involved Contractors Project in the tasks/process as appropriate. Manager 1.6 Can the works avoid further disturbance to the item? Project Manager to confirm with Contractors Project TfNSW Environment and Planning Manager. Manager Complete the remaining tasks in Step 1. 1.7 Excavation Director to advise the Project Manager whether TfNSW has approval to Contractors Project impact on the ‘item’. Manager Does Metro have an approval or permit to impact on the item? If yes, work may recommence in accordance with that approval or permit. There is no further requirement to follow this procedure. If no, continue to next step. 1.8 Has the ‘find’ been damaged or harmed? Contractors Project If yes, record the incident in the Incident Management System Implement any Manager, Excavation additional reporting requirements related to the planning approval and CEMP, Director where relevant. Contract Sydney Metro Manager, Environment Safety, Environment and Business Systems
2 Contact and engage an archaeologist and/or an Aboriginal heritage consultant
TfNSW Unexpected Finds Procedure v1.4 19.04.18
© TfNSW 2015 Page 15 of 52
Sydney Metro Unexpected Heritage Finds Procedure
Step Task Responsibility Guidance and tools 2.1 If an archaeologist and/or Aboriginal heritage consultant has been previously appointed Contractors Project for the project, contact them to discuss the location and extent of the item and arrange a Manager, Excavation site inspection, if required. The project CEMP may contain contact details of the Director archaeologist/Aboriginal heritage consultant. Where there is no project archaeologist engaged for the works engage a suitably qualified consultant to assess the find: if the find is a non-Aboriginal deposit, engage a suitably qualified and experienced archaeological consultant if the find is likely to be an Aboriginal object, engage an Aboriginal heritage consultant to assess the find. 2.2 If requested, provide photographs of the item taken during Step 1.3 to the archaeologist Contractors Project Appendix C or Aboriginal heritage consultant. Manager, Excavation (Photographing Director Unexpected Heritage items) 3 Preliminary assessment and recording of the find 3.1 In a minority of cases, the archaeologist/Aboriginal heritage consultant may determine Archaeologist/ Aboriginal Proceed to Step 8 from the photographs that no site inspection is required because no heritage constraint heritage consultant/ exists for the project (e.g. the item is not a ‘relic’, a ‘heritage item’ or an ‘Aboriginal Contractors Project object’). Any such advice should be provided in writing (e.g. via email or letter with the Manager, Excavation consultant’s name and company details clearly identifiable) to the TfNSW Project Director Manager.
TfNSW Unexpected Finds Procedure v1.4 19.04.18
© TfNSW 2015 Page 16 of 52
Sydney Metro Unexpected Heritage Finds Procedure
Step Task Responsibility Guidance and tools 3.2 Arrange site access for the archaeologist/Aboriginal heritage consultant to inspect the item as soon as practicable. In the majority of cases a site inspection is required to Contractors Project conduct a preliminary assessment. Manager, Excavation Director 3.3 Subject to the archaeologist/Aboriginal heritage consultant’s assessment, work may Archaeologist/ Aboriginal recommence at a set distance from the item. This is to protect any other archaeological heritage consultant material that may exist in the vicinity, which may have not yet been uncovered. Existing Contractors Project protective fencing established in Step 1.2 may need to be adjusted to reflect the extent of Manager, Excavation the newly assessed protective area. No works are to take place within this area once Director established. 3.4 The archaeologist/Aboriginal heritage consultant may provide advice after the site Archaeologist/ Aboriginal Proceed to Step 8 inspection and preliminary assessment that no heritage constraint exists for the project heritage consultant/ Refer to Appendix A (e.g. the item is not a ‘relic’ or a ‘heritage item’ or an ‘aboriginal item’. Any such advice Contractors Project (Identifying heritage should be provided in writing (e.g. via email or letter with the consultant’s name and Manager, Excavation items) company details clearly identifiable) to the Metro Project Manager. Director
Note that : a relic is evidence of past human activity which has local or State heritage significance. It may include items such as bottles, utensils, remnants of clothing, crockery, personal effects, tools, machinery and domestic or industrial refuse an Aboriginal object may include a shell midden, stone tools, bones, rock art or a scarred tree a “work”, building or standing structure may include tram or train tracks, kerbing, historic road pavement, fences, sheds or building foundations.
TfNSW Unexpected Finds Procedure v1.4 19.04.18
© TfNSW 2015 Page 17 of 52
Sydney Metro Unexpected Heritage Finds Procedure
Step Task Responsibility Guidance and tools 3.5 Where required, seek additional specialist technical advice (such as a forensic or physical Contractors Project anthropologist to identify skeletal remains). The archaeologist/Aboriginal heritage Manager, Excavation consultant can provide contacts for such specialist consultants. Director 3.6 Where the item has been identified as a ‘relic’ or ‘heritage item’ or an ‘Aboriginal object’ Archaeologist/ Aboriginal the archaeologist should formally record the item. heritage consultant 3.7 OEH (Heritage Division for non-Aboriginal relics and Planning and Aboriginal Heritage Contractors Project Section for Aboriginal objects) can be notified informally by telephone at this stage by the Manager, Excavation Sydney Metro Principal Manager Sustainability Environment and Planning (Program). Any Director verbal conversations with regulators must be noted on the project file for future reference. 4 Section 4 not used
TfNSW Unexpected Finds Procedure v1.4 19.04.18
© TfNSW 2015 Page 18 of 52
Sydney Metro Unexpected Heritage Finds Procedure
Step Task Responsibility Guidance and tools 5 Notify the regulator, if required. 5.1 Based on the findings of the archaeological or heritage management plan and Contractors Project corresponding legislative requirements, is the find required to be notified to OEH and the Manager, Excavation Secretary? Director If no, proceed directly to Step 6 If yes, proceed to next step. 5.2 If notification is required, complete the template notification letter, including the Contractors Project Appendix F archaeological/heritage management plan and other relevant supporting information and Manager, Excavation (Template Notification forward to the Sydney Metro Principal Manager Sustainability Environment and Planning Director Letter) (Program) for signature. 5.3 Forward the signed notification letter to OEH and the Secretary. Contractors Project Informal notification (via a phone call or email) to OEH prior to sending the letter is Manager, Excavation appropriate. The archaeological or heritage management plan and the completed site Director recording form (Appendix B) must be submitted with the notification letter (for both Aboriginal objects and non-Aboriginal relics). For Part 5.1 projects, the Department of Planning and Environment must also be notified. 5.4 A copy of the final signed notification letter, archaeological or heritage management plan Contractors Project and the site recording form is to be kept on file and a copy sent to the Sydney Metro Manager, Excavation Project Manager. Director 6 Implement archaeological or heritage management plan
TfNSW Unexpected Finds Procedure v1.4 19.04.18
© TfNSW 2015 Page 19 of 52
Sydney Metro Unexpected Heritage Finds Procedure
Step Task Responsibility Guidance and tools 6.1 Modify the archaeological or heritage management plan to take into account any Contractors Project additional advice resulting from notification and discussions with OEH. Manager, Excavation Director 6.2 Implement the archaeological or heritage management plan. Where impact is expected, Contractors Project this may include a formal assessment of significance and heritage impact assessment, Manager, Excavation preparation of excavation or recording methodologies, consultation with Registered Director Aboriginal Parties, obtaining heritage approvals etc., if required. 6.3 Where heritage approval is required contact the Environment and Planning Manager for Contractors Project further advice and support material. Please note there are time constraints associated Manager, Excavation with heritage approval preparation and processing. Director 6.4 Assess whether heritage impact is consistent with the project approval or if project Contractors Project approval modification is required from the Department of Planning and Environment. Manager, Excavation Director 6.5 Where statutory approvals (or project approval modification) are required, impact upon Contractors Project relics and/or Aboriginal objects must not occur until heritage approvals are issued by the Manager, Excavation appropriate regulator. Director 6.6 Where statutory approval is not required but where recording is recommended by the Contractors Project archaeologist/Aboriginal heritage consultant, sufficient time must be allowed for this to Manager, Excavation occur. Director
TfNSW Unexpected Finds Procedure v1.4 19.04.18
© TfNSW 2015 Page 20 of 52
Sydney Metro Unexpected Heritage Finds Procedure
Step Task Responsibility Guidance and tools 6.7 Ensure short term and permanent storage locations are identified for archaeological Contractors Project material or other heritage material removed from site, where required. Interested third Manager, Excavation parties (e.g. museums, local Aboriginal land councils, or local councils) should be Director consulted on this issue. Contact the archaeologist or Aboriginal heritage consultant for advice on this matter, if required. 7 Section 7 Not Used
8 Resume work 8.1 Seek written clearance to resume project work from the Environment and Planning Contractors Project Manager and the Archaeologist/Aboriginal heritage consultant. Clearance would only be Manager, Excavation given once all archaeological excavation and/or heritage recommendations and approvals Director (where required) are complete. Resumption of project work must be in accordance with the all relevant project/heritage approvals/determinations. 8.2 If required, ensure archaeological excavation/heritage reporting and other heritage Contractors Project approval conditions are completed in the required timeframes. This includes artefact Manager, Excavation retention repositories, conservation and/or disposal strategies. Director 8.3 Deleted 8.4 If additional unexpected items are discovered this procedure must begin again from All Step 1.
TfNSW Unexpected Finds Procedure v1.4 19.04.18
© TfNSW 2015 Page 21 of 52
Sydney Metro Unexpected Heritage Finds Procedure
8. Responsibilities
Roles and Responsibilities
Role Responsibility or role under this guideline Contractor / Supervisor Stop work immediately when an unexpected heritage find is encountered. Cordon off area until Environmental Manager advises that work can recommence. Contractor or Environment Manage the process of identifying, protecting and Manager mitigating impacts on the ‘find’. Liaise with Sydney Metro Project Manager and Environment and Planning Manager and assist the archaeologist/Aboriginal heritage consultant with mitigation and regulatory requirements. Complete Incident Report and review CEMP for any changes required. Propose amendments to the CEMP if any changes are required. Contractor’s or Project Provide expert advice to the Sydney Metro Environment Heritage Advisor or and Planning Manager on ‘find’ identification, Consultant significance, mitigation, legislative procedures and regulatory requirements. Environmental Representative Independent environmental advisor engaged by Sydney Metro Review and provides advice on heritage management plan and changes to the CEMP. Ensures compliance with relevant approvals (new and existing). Heritage Division of OEH Regulate the care, protection and management of relics (non-Aboriginal heritage). Delegated authority for Heritage Council Issue excavation permits. Registered Aboriginal Parties Aboriginal people who have registered with Sydney (RAPs) Metro to be consulted about a proposed project or activity in accordance with the OEH Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Consultation Requirements for Proponents 2010. Sydney Metro Environment Notify the TfNSW Principal Manager, Environmental and Planning Manager Management of ‘find’ and manage Incident Reporting once completed by Environmental Manager. Contractors Project Manager Ensures all aspects of this procedure are implemented. Advise Contractor / Supervisor to recommence work when all applicable requirements have been satisfied.
TfNSW Unexpected Finds Procedure v1.4 19.04.188
© Page 22 of 52
Sydney Metro Unexpected Heritage Finds Procedure
9. Seeking advice Advice on this procedure should be sought from the Sydney Metro Environment and Planning Manager in the first instance. Contractors and alliance partners should ensure their own project environment managers are aware of and understand this procedure. Technical archaeological or heritage advice regarding an unexpected heritage item should be sought from a suitably qualified and experienced archaeologist/Aboriginal heritage consultant. 10. Related documents and references
Related Documents Environmental Incident Classification and Reporting – 9TP-PR-105 Guide to Environmental Control Map – 3TP-SD-015 NSW Heritage Office (1998), Skeletal remains: guidelines for the management of human skeletal remains. Roads and Maritime Services (2015), Standard Management Procedure Unexpected Heritage Items. Department of Environment and Conservation NSW (2006), Manual for the identification of Aboriginal remains.
11. List of appendices The following appendices are included to support this procedure:
Appendix A: Examples of finds encountered during construction works Appendix B: Unexpected Heritage Item Recording Form Appendix C: Photographing Unexpected Heritage Items Appendix D: Uncovering Bones Appendix E: Archaeological Advice Checklist Appendix F: Template Notification Letter
TfNSW Unexpected Finds Procedure v1.4 19.04.18
© TfNSW 2015 Page 23 of 52
Sydney Metro Unexpected Heritage Finds Procedure
Appendix A - Examples of finds encountered during construction works
Photo 1 - Aboriginal artefacts found at the Wickham Transport Interchange, 2015
TfNSW Unexpected Finds Procedure v1.4 19.04.18
© TfNSW 2015 Page 24 of 52
Sydney Metro Unexpected Heritage Finds Procedure
Photo 2 – Aboriginal artefacts (shell material) found at the Wickham Transport Interchange, 2015
Photo 3 1840s seawall and 1880s retaining wall uncovered at Balmain East, 2016
TfNSW Unexpected Finds Procedure v1.4 19.04.18
© TfNSW 2015 Page 25 of 52
Sydney Metro Unexpected Heritage Finds Procedure
Photo 4 Sandstone pavers uncovered at Balmain East, 2016
Photo 5 - Platform structure at Hamilton Railway Station classified as a ‘work’ by the project archaeologist - Wickham Transport Interchange project, 2015
TfNSW Unexpected Finds Procedure v1.4 19.04.18
© TfNSW 2015 Page 26 of 52
Sydney Metro Unexpected Heritage Finds Procedure
Photo 6 - Platform structure at Hamilton Railway Station classified as a ‘work’ by the project archaeologist - Wickham Transport Interchange project, 2015
Photo 7 - Sandstone flagging and cesspit - Wynyard Walk project, 2014
TfNSW Unexpected Finds Procedure v1.4 19.04.18
© TfNSW 2015 Page 27 of 52
Sydney Metro Unexpected Heritage Finds Procedure
Photo 8 - Chinese Ming Dynasty pottery and English porcelain/pottery dating back to early 19th century -Wynyard Walk project, 2014
Photo 9 - Pottery made by convict potter Thomas Ball during the early settlement - Wynyard Walk project, 2014
TfNSW Unexpected Finds Procedure v1.4 19.04.18
© TfNSW 2015 Page 28 of 52
Sydney Metro Unexpected Heritage Finds Procedure
The following images, obtained from the Roads and Maritime Services’ Standard Management Procedure for Unexpected Heritage items 2015, can be used to assist in the preliminary identification of potential unexpected items during construction and maintenance works.
Photo 10 - Top left hand picture continuing clockwise: Stock camp remnants (Hume Highway Bypass at Tarcutta); Linear archaeological feature with post holes (Hume Highway Duplication), Animal bones (Hume Highway Bypass at
TfNSW Unexpected Finds Procedure v1.4 19.04.18
© TfNSW 2015 Page 29 of 52
Sydney Metro Unexpected Heritage Finds Procedure
Woomargama); Cut wooden stake; Glass jars, bottles, spoon and fork recovered from refuse pit associated with a Newcastle Hotel (Pacific Highway, Adamstown Heights, Newcastle area) (RMS, 2015).
TfNSW Unexpected Finds Procedure v1.4 19.04.18
© TfNSW 2015 Page 30 of 52
Sydney Metro Unexpected Heritage Finds Procedure
Photo 11 - Top left hand picture continuing clockwise: Stock camp remnants (Hume Highway Bypass at Tarcutta); Linear archaeological feature with post holes (Hume Highway Duplication), Animal bones (Hume Highway Bypass at
TfNSW Unexpected Finds Procedure v1.4 19.04.18
© TfNSW 2015 Page 31 of 52
Sydney Metro Unexpected Heritage Finds Procedure
Woomargama); Cut wooden stake; Glass jars, bottles, spoon and fork recovered from refuse pit associated with a Newcastle Hotel (Pacific Highway, Adamstown Heights, Newcastle area) (RMS, 2015).
TfNSW Unexpected Finds Procedure v1.4 19.04.18
© TfNSW 2015 Page 32 of 52
Sydney Metro Unexpected Heritage Finds Procedure
Appendix B- Unexpected heritage item recording form
TfNSW Unexpected Finds Procedure v1.4 19.04.188
© Page 33 of 52
Sydney Metro Unexpected Heritage Finds Procedure
Example of unexpected heritage item recording form
This form is to be completed Excavation Director on the discovery of an archaeological heritage item during construction or maintenance works
Date: Recorded by: (include name and position) Project name: Description of works being undertaken: Description of exact location of item Description of item found (What type of item is it likely to be? Tick the relevant boxes). A. A relic A ‘relic’ is evidence of a past human activity relating to the settlement of NSW with local or state heritage significance. A relic might include bottle, utensils, plates, cups, household items, tools, implements, and similar items B. A ‘work’, A ‘work’ can generally be defined as a building or form infrastructure such as track or rail structure’ tracks, timber sleepers, a culvert, road base, a bridge pier, kerbing, and similar items C. An Aboriginal An ‘Aboriginal object’ may include object stone tools, stone flakes, shell middens, rock art, scarred trees and human bones D. Bone Bones can either be human or animal remains. Remember that you must contact the local police immediately by TfNSW Unexpected Finds Procedure v1.4 19.04.188
© Page 35 of 52
Sydney Metro Unexpected Heritage Finds Procedure
telephone if you are certain that the bone(s) are human remains. E. Other Provide a short description of the item (eg metal rail tracks running parallel to the rail corridor. Good condition. Tracks set in concrete, approximately 10 cm below the current ground surface).
Sketch (provide a sketch of the item’s general location in relation to other road features so its approximate location can be mapped without having to re-excavate it. In addition, please include details of the location and direction of any photographs of the item taken) Action taken (Tick either A or B)
A. Unexpected Describe how works would avoid item would not impact on the item. (eg the rail tracks be further would be left in situ and recovered with impacts on by paving). the works
TfNSW Unexpected Finds Procedure v1.4 19.04.188
© TfNSW 2015 Page 36 of 52
Sydney Metro Unexpected Heritage Finds Procedure
B. Unexpected Describe how works would impact item would be on the item. (eg milling is required to be further impacted continued to a depth of 200 mm depth to by the works ensure the pavement requirements are met. Rail tracks would need to be removed.)
Excavation Director Signature
Signature
Important It is a statutory offence to disturb Aboriginal objects and historic relics (including human remains) without an approval. All works affecting objects and relics must cease until an approval is sought. Approvals may also be required to impact on certain works.
TfNSW Unexpected Finds Procedure v1.4 19.04.188
© TfNSW 2015 Page 37 of 52
Sydney Metro Unexpected Heritage Finds Procedure
Appendix C- Photographing unexpected heritage items
Photographs of unexpected items in their current context (in situ) may assist archaeologists/Aboriginal heritage consultants to better identify the heritage values of the item. Emailing good quality photographs to specialists can allow for better quality and faster heritage advice. The key elements that must be captured in photographs of the item include its position, the item itself and any distinguishing features. All photographs must have a scale (ruler, scale bar, mobile phone, coin etc) and a note describing the direction of the photograph. Context and detailed photographs It is important to take a general photograph (Figure 1) to convey the location and setting of the item. This will add value to the subsequent detailed photographs also required (Figure 2). Removal of the item from its context (e.g. excavating from the ground) for photographic purposes is not permitted.
Figure 1: Telford road uncovered on the Great Western Highway (Leura) in 2008 (RMS, 2015).
Photographing distinguishing features Where unexpected items have a distinguishing feature, close up detailed photographs must be taken of these features, where practicable. In the case of a building or bridge, this may include diagnostic details architectural or technical features. See Figures 3 and 4 for examples.
TfNSW Unexpected Finds Procedure v1.4 19.04.188
© TfNSW 2015 Page 39 of 52
Sydney Metro Unexpected Heritage Finds Procedure
Photographing bones The majority of bones found on site will those of be recently deceased animal bones often requiring no further assessment (unless they are in archaeological context). However, if bones are human, the police must be contacted immediately (see Appendix F for detailed guidance). Taking quality photographs of the bones can often resolve this issue quickly. The project archaeologist can confirm if bones are human or non-human if provided with appropriate photographs. Ensure that photographs of bones are not concealed by foliage (Figure 5) as this makes it difficult to identify. Minor hand removal of foliage can be undertaken as long as disturbance of the bone does not occur. Excavation of the ground to remove bone(s) should not occur, nor should they be pulled out of the ground if partially exposed. Where sediment (adhering to a bone found on the ground surface) conceals portions of a bone (Figure 6) ensure the photograph is taken of the bone (if any) that is not concealed by sediment.
TfNSW Unexpected Finds Procedure v1.4 19.04.188
© TfNSW 2015 Page 40 of 52
Sydney Metro Unexpected Heritage Finds Procedure
Ensure that all close up photographs include the whole bone and then specific details of the bone (especially the ends of long bones, the epiphysis, which is critical for species identification). Figures 7 and 8 are examples of good photographs of bones that can easily be identified from the photograph alone. They show sufficient detail of the complete bone and the epiphysis.
TfNSW Unexpected Finds Procedure v1.4 19.04.188
© TfNSW 2015 Page 41 of 52
Sydney Metro Unexpected Heritage Finds Procedure
Appendix D - Uncovering bones This appendix provides advice regarding: what to do on first discovering bones the range of human skeletal notification pathways additional considerations and requirements when managing the discovery of human remains. 1 . First uncovering bones Refer to the Sydney Metro Exhumation Management Plan Stop all work in the vicinity of the find. All bones uncovered during project works should be treated with care and urgency as they have the potential to be human remains. The bones must be identified as either human or non-human as soon as possible by a qualified forensic or physical anthropologist.. On the very rare occasion where it is immediately obvious from the remains that they are human, the Project Manager (or a delegate) should inform the police by telephone prior to seeking specialist advice. It will be obvious that it is human skeletal remains where there is no doubt, as demonstrated by the example in Figure 110. Often skeletal elements in isolation (such as a skull) can also clearly be identified as human. Note it may also be obvious that human remains have been uncovered when soft tissue and/or clothing are present.
10 After Department of Environment and Conservation NSW (2006), Manual for the identification of Aboriginal Remains: 17
TfNSW Unexpected Finds Procedure v1.4 19.04.188
© TfNSW 2015 Page 43 of 52
Sydney Metro Unexpected Heritage Finds Procedure
This preliminary phone call is to let the police know that a specialist skeletal assessment to determine the approximate date of death which will inform legal jurisdiction. The police may wish to take control of the site at this stage. If not, a forensic or physical anthropologist must be requested to make an on-site assessment of the skeletal remains. Where it is not immediately obvious that the bones are human (in the majority of cases, illustrated by Figure 2), specialist assessment is required to establish the species of the bones. Photographs of the bones can assist this assessment if they are clear and taken in accordance with guidance provided in Appendix C. Good photographs often result in the bones being identified by a specialist without requiring a site visit; noting they are nearly always non-human. In these cases, non-human skeletal remains must be treated like any other unexpected archaeological find. If the bones are identified as human (either by photographs or an on-site inspection) a technical specialist must determine the likely ancestry (Aboriginal or non-Aboriginal) and burial context (archaeological or forensic). This assessment is required to identify the legal regulator of the human remains so urgent notification (as below) can occur. Preliminary telephone or verbal notification by the archaeologist to the Sydney Metro Principal Manager Sustainability Environment and Planning (Program) appropriate. This
TfNSW Unexpected Finds Procedure v1.4 19.04.188
© TfNSW 2015 Page 44 of 52
Sydney Metro Unexpected Heritage Finds Procedure
must be followed up later by a formal letter notification to the relevant regulator (as per Appendix G) when a management plan has been developed and agreed to by the relevant parties.
2 . Range of human skeletal notification pathways The following is a summary of the different notification pathways required for human skeletal remains depending on the preliminary skeletal assessment of ancestry and burial context. A. Human bones are from a recently deceased person (less than 100 years old).
Action A police officer must be notified immediately as per the obligations to report a death or suspected death under s35 of the Coroners Act 2009 (NSW). It should be assumed the police will then take command of the site until otherwise directed. B. Human bones are archaeological in nature (more than 100 years old) and are likely to be Aboriginal remains. Action The OEH (Planning and Aboriginal Heritage Section) must be notified immediately. The Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Advisor must contact and inform the relevant Aboriginal community stakeholders who may request to be present on site. C. Human bones are archaeological in nature (more than 100 years old) and likely to be non-Aboriginal remains. Action The OEH (Heritage Division) must be notified immediately Figure 3 summarises the notification pathways on finding bones.
TfNSW Unexpected Finds Procedure v1.4 19.04.188
© TfNSW 2015 Page 45 of 52
Sydney Metro Unexpected Heritage Finds Procedure
Figure 3 Overview of steps to be undertaken on the discovery of bones After the appropriate verbal notifications (as described in 2B and 2C above), the Project Manager must proceed through the Unexpected Heritage Items Exhumation Management Plan (Step 4). It is noted that no Exhumation Management Plan is required for forensic cases (2A), as all future management is a police matter. Non-human skeletal remains must be treated like any other unexpected archaeological find and so must proceed to record the find as per Step 3.6.
3. Additional considerations and requirements Uncovering archaeological human remains must be managed intensively and needs to consider a number of additional specific issues. These issues might include facilitating culturally appropriate processes when dealing with Aboriginal remains (such as repatriation and cultural ceremonies). Project Managers may need to consider overnight site security of any exposed remains and may need to manage the onsite attendance of a number of different external stakeholders during assessment and/or investigation of remains. Project Managers may also be advised to liaise with local church/religious groups and the media to manage community issues arising from the find. Additional investigations may be required to identify living descendants, particularly if the remains are to be removed and relocated. TfNSW Unexpected Finds Procedure v1.4 19.04.188
© TfNSW 2015 Page 46 of 52
Sydney Metro Unexpected Heritage Finds Procedure
If exhumation of the remains (from a formal burial or a vault) is required, Project Managers should also be aware of additional approval requirements under the Public Health Act 1991 (NSW). Specifically, TfNSW is required to apply to the Director General of NSW Department of Health for approval to exhume human remains as per Clause 26 of the Public Health (Disposal of Bodies) Regulation 2002 (NSW)11. Further, the exhumation of such remains needs to consider health risks such as infectious disease control, exhumation procedures and reburial approval and registration. Further guidance on this matter can be found at the NSW Department of Health website. In addition, due to the potential significant statutory and common law controls and prohibitions associated with interfering with a public cemetery, project teams are advised, when works uncover human remains adjacent to cemeteries, to confirm the cemetery’s exact boundaries.
11 This requirement is in addition to heritage approvals under the Heritage Act 1977.
TfNSW Unexpected Finds Procedure v1.4 19.04.188
© TfNSW 2015 Page 47 of 52
Sydney Metro Unexpected Heritage Finds Procedure
Appendix E - Archaeological/heritage advice checklist
The archaeologist/Aboriginal heritage consultant must advise the Sydney Metro Principal Manager Sustainability Environment and Planning (Program) of an appropriate archaeological or heritage management plan as soon as possible after an inspection of the site has been completed (see Step 4). An archaeological or heritage management plan can include a range of activities and processes, which differ depending on the find and its significance. In discussions with the archaeologist/Aboriginal heritage consultant the following checklist can be used as a prompt to ensure all relevant heritage issues are considered when developing this plan. This will allow the project team to receive clear and full advice to move forward quickly. Archaeological and/or heritage advice on how to proceed can be received in a letter or email outlining all relevant archaeological and/or heritage issues.
Required Outcome/notes Assessment and investigation Assessment of significance Yes/No Assessment of heritage impact Yes/No Archaeological excavation Yes/No Archival photographic recording Yes/No Heritage approvals and notifications AHIP, section 140, section 139 exceptions etc. Yes/No Regulator relics/objects notification Yes/No Notification to Sydney Trains for s170 heritage Yes/No conservation register Compliance with CEMP or other project Yes/No heritage approvals Stakeholder consultation Aboriginal stakeholder consultation Yes/No Artefact/heritage item management Retention or conservation strategy (e.g. items Yes/No may be subject to long conservation and interpretation) Disposal strategy Yes/No Short term and permanent storage locations Yes/No (interested third parties should be consulted on this issue). Control Agreement for Aboriginal objects Yes/No
TfNSW Unexpected Finds Procedure v1.4 19.04.188
© TfNSW 2015 Page 49 of 52
Sydney Metro Unexpected Heritage Finds Procedure
Appendix F- Template notification letter
TfNSW Unexpected Finds Procedure v1.4 19.04.188
© TfNSW 2015 Page 50 of 52
Sydney Metro Unexpected Heritage Finds Procedure
Insert on TfNSW letterhead Select and type date] [Select and type reference number]
XXX Manager, Conservation Heritage Division, Office of Environment and Heritage Locked Bag 5020 Parramatta NSW 2124
[Select and type salutation and name],
Re: Unexpected heritage item discovered during Transport for NSW –Sydney Metro activities.
I write to inform you of an unexpected [select: relic, heritage item or Aboriginal object] found during TfNSW Infrastructure and Services construction works at [insert location] on [insert date] in accordance with the notification requirement under select: section 146 of the Heritage Act 1977 (NSW). [Where the regulator has been informally notified at an earlier date by telephone, this should be referred to here]. NB: On finding Aboriginal human skeletal remains this letter must also be sent to the Commonwealth Minister for the Environment in accordance with notification requirements under section 20(1) of the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Heritage Protection Act 1984 (Commonwealth).
[Provide a brief overview of the project background and project area. Provide a summary of the description and location of the item, including a map and image where possible. Also include how the project was assessed under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW) (e.g. Part 5). Also include any project approval number, if available]. Sydney Metro [or contractor] has sought professional archaeological advice regarding the item. A preliminary assessment indicates [provide a summary description and likely significance of the item]. Please find additional information on the site recording form attached. Based on the preliminary findings, Sydney Metro [or contractor] is proposing [provide a summary of the proposed archaeological/heritage approach (e.g. develop archaeological research design (where relevant), seek heritage approvals, undertake archaeological investigation or conservation/interpretation strategy). Also include preliminary justification of such heritage impact with regard to project design constraints and delivery program]. The proposed approach will be further developed in consultation with a nominated Office of Environment and Heritage staff member. Should you have any feedback on the proposed approach, or if you require any further information, please do not hesitate to contact [Environment and Planning Project Manager] on (02) XXXX XXXX.
TfNSW Unexpected Finds Procedure v1.4 19.04.188
© TfNSW 2015 Page 51 of 52
Sydney Metro Unexpected Heritage Finds Procedure
Yours sincerely [Sender name] Sydney Metro Principal Manager Sustainability Environment and Planning (Program) [Attach the archaeological/heritage management plan and site recording form].
TfNSW Unexpected Finds Procedure v1.4 19.04.188
© TfNSW 2015 Page 52 of 52
Suite 2.06, Level 2 29-31 Solent Circuit Baulkham Hills NSW 2153 HBI Healthy Buildings International Pty Ltd A.C.N. 003 270 693 A.B.N. 39 003 270 693 Tel: 61 (02) 9659 5433 e-mail: [email protected] Web: www.hbi.com.au
Stuart Hodgson 5 April 2018 Director Program Sustainability Environment & Planning Sydney Metro Transport for NSW PO Box K659 HAYMARKET NSW 1240 Ref: 170108-UHFP
Dear Stuart
RE: Endorsement of Sydney Metro TfNSW Unexpected Finds Procedure v1.4 – SSI 15_7400
Thank you for providing the following document for Environmental Representative (ER) review and endorsement as required by the Condition of Approval A24 (d) of the Sydney Metro City & Southwest project (SSI – 15_7400 January 9 2017).
Sydney Metro City & Southwest TfNSW Unexpected Finds Procedure v1.4 (the UHFP) required under Condition E19
As an approved ER for the Sydney Metro City & Southwest project, I have reviewed and provided comment to changes in this document to reflect updates in the SSI 15_7400 Modification approved by the Minister for Planning, 22 March 2018. I consider it appropriate for implementation.
Yours sincerely
Jo Robertson Environmental Representative (Alternate) – Sydney Metro – City and South West
Leaders in Environmental Consulting 1
9-19 Elizabeth Street, Sydney – Demolition Works • Construction Heritage Management Plan
APPENDIX B RECORD OF STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION
NSW Heritage Council and its delegate
As part of required consultation with the NSW Heritage Council and its delegate, the Heritage Council was briefed by Sydney Metro and Macquarie on the Sydney Metro City & Southwest - 50 Martin Place project on 4 April 2018, identifying potential heritage risks, with mitigation and potential remediation processes. The report was noted by the Heritage Council.
The Director of the Heritage Division (Office of Environment and Heritage, Tim Smith), as the delegate of the Heritage Council was briefed by Sydney Metro on the Preconstruction Low Impact Works application (as documented by Tanner Kibble Denton Architects) on 5 July, 2018. The briefing was noted. Clarification of Scope of Works described in the drawings prepared by TKD Architects documents was requested, and revised drawings were submitted to the Heritage Division (included as Appendix C of this CHMP).
Lendlease provided this Construction Heritage Management Plan (Revision P4) to the Director of the Heritage Division (Office of Environment and Heritage, Tim Smith), as the delegate of the Heritage Council for review on 7 September, and requested comments.
Lendlease followed up with an email requests for comments on 19 September.
The Heritage Division (Sarah Jane Brazil, Senior Team Leader, Major Projects) responded on 24 September 2018 with the following comments:
“It is understood that the CHMP is limited to the demolition of all above ground and in ground structures related to 9-19 Elizabeth Street and does not involve excavation. In addition, 9-19 Elizabeth Street is not included on any statutory heritage listings. However, the site adjoins 50 Martin Place which is listed on the State Heritage Register (Commonwealth Bank, SHR 01427).
I advise that the supplied CHMP is considered satisfactory to guide the works required for Sydney Metro Martin Place (9-19 Elizabeth Street).”
Copies of email correspondence between Lendlease and the Heritage Division are included in this appendix as a record of the stakeholder consultation process).
The Preconstruction Low Impact Works application was approved by DP&E on 4 September 2018. The works are currently underway. The works are not covered by this CHMP, but the TKD Architects drawings are included in Appendix C for information.
Tanner Kibble Denton Architects November 2018 • Issue D B-1 Roche, Angela
From: Sarah Jane Brazil
Dear Angela,
I refer to your email on 7 September 2018 requesting review of the Construction Heritage Management Plan (CHMP) for the Sydney Metro Martin Place (9-19 Elizabeth Street).
The submitted CHMP is a requirement of condition CoA C3 of project approval SSI 15_7400, which requires the development a Heritage Management Plan in consultation with OEH (Heritage Council delegate).
The supplied document Sydney metro City & Southwest – Martin Place Station, 9-19 Elizabeth Street, Sydney – Demolition Works. TKD Architects, prepared for Lendlease, September 2018, Issue P4, Project number: 161035, has been reviewed and the following comments are provided
It is understood that the CHMP is limited to the demolition of all above ground and in ground structures related to 9-19 Elizabeth Street and does not involve excavation. In addition, 9-19 Elizabeth Street is not included on any statutory heritage listings. However, the site adjoins 50 Martin Place which is listed on the State Heritage Register (Commonwealth Bank, SHR 01427).
I advise that the supplied CHMP is considered satisfactory to guide the works required for Sydney Metro Martin Place (9-19 Elizabeth Street).
Thank you for the opportunity to provide comment on the CHMP.
Yours sincerely
Sarah Jane Brazil Level 6, 10 Valentine Ave, Parramatta Senior Team Leader PO Box A290, Sydney South 2000 Major Projects T 02 9585 6510
1 From: Roche, Angela
Dear Tim and Felicity
Please find attached the Construction Heritage Management Plan for Demolition of 9-19 Elizabeth St (a building in the North part of the Martin Place Metro Precinct) for your review.
Pursuant of condition C3 of the Critical State Significant Infrastructure Approval SSI 15_7400 the Construction Environmental Management Plan Subplan for Heritage Management is to be prepared in consultation with the Heritage Council (or its delegate).
Please let me know if there is any further information that you need.
Kind Regards
Angela
Angela Roche Project Manager, Core Places, Building Level 14, Tower Three, International Towers Sydney Exchange Place, 300 Barangaroo Avenue, Barangaroo NSW 2000 M +61 401 715 176 [email protected] | www.lendlease.com
Find out more about Core Places
2 This email and any attachments are confidential and may also contain copyright material of the Lendlease Group. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify us immediately and delete all copies of this message. You must not copy, use, disclose, distribute or rely on the information contained in it. Copying or use of this communication or information in it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Contracts cannot be concluded with the Lendlease Group nor service effected by email. None of the staff of the Lendlease Group are authorised to enter into contracts on behalf of any member of the Lendlease Group in this manner. The fact that this communication is in electronic form does not constitute our consent to conduct transactions by electronic means or to use or accept electronic records or electronic signatures. Confidentiality and legal privilege attached to this communication are not waived or lost by reason of mistaken delivery to you. Lendlease does not guarantee that this email or the attachment(s) are unaffected by computer virus, corruption or other defects and accepts no liability for any damage caused by this email or its attachments due to viruses, interception, corruption or unauthorised access. Lendlease Group may monitor email traffic data and also the content of email for the purposes of security and staff training. Please note that our servers may not be located in your country. A list of Lendlease Group entities can be found here.
------This email is intended for the addressee(s) named and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender and then delete it immediately. Any views expressed in this email are those of the individual sender except where the sender expressly and with authority states them to be the views of the NSW Office of Environment and Heritage.
PLEASE CONSIDER THE ENVIRONMENT BEFORE PRINTING THIS EMAIL
3 Roche, Angela
From: Roche, Angela Sent: Wednesday, 19 September 2018 3:30 PM To: [email protected]; [email protected] Cc: [email protected]; Turner, Ron; Armstrong, Ben; Grennan, Paul; Stephanie Ballango; Ambler, Jason Subject: RE: Martin Place Metro - CHMP
Dear Tim and Felicity
Just a follow up on the email below to check and see if you needed anything further to aid in your assessment of the CHMP.
Kind Regards
Angela
Angela Roche Project Manager, Core Places, Building Level 14, Tower Three, International Towers Sydney Exchange Place, 300 Barangaroo Avenue, Barangaroo NSW 2000 M +61 401 715 176 [email protected] | www.lendlease.com
Find out more about Core Places
From: Roche, Angela Sent: Friday, 7 September 2018 11:45 AM To: '[email protected]'
Dear Tim and Felicity
Please find attached the Construction Heritage Management Plan for Demolition of 9-19 Elizabeth St (a building in the North part of the Martin Place Metro Precinct) for your review.
Pursuant of condition C3 of the Critical State Significant Infrastructure Approval SSI 15_7400 the Construction Environmental Management Plan Subplan for Heritage Management is to be prepared in consultation with the Heritage Council (or its delegate).
Please let me know if there is any further information that you need.
Kind Regards
Angela
Angela Roche Project Manager, Core Places, Building Level 14, Tower Three, International Towers Sydney Exchange Place, 300 Barangaroo Avenue, Barangaroo NSW 2000 M +61 401 715 176 [email protected] | www.lendlease.com
Find out more about Core Places
2 Roche, Angela
From: Roche, Angela Sent: Friday, 7 September 2018 11:45 AM To: '[email protected]'; '[email protected]' Cc: '[email protected]'; 'Turner, Ron'; 'Armstrong, Ben'; 'Grennan, Paul'; 'Stephanie Ballango'; Ambler, Jason Subject: Martin Place Metro - CHMP Attachments: 161035 180903 CHMP - 9-19 Elizabeth Street demo [P4] rec 06.09.18.pdf
Dear Tim and Felicity
Please find attached the Construction Heritage Management Plan for Demolition of 9-19 Elizabeth St (a building in the North part of the Martin Place Metro Precinct) for your review.
Pursuant of condition C3 of the Critical State Significant Infrastructure Approval SSI 15_7400 the Construction Environmental Management Plan Subplan for Heritage Management is to be prepared in consultation with the Heritage Council (or its delegate).
Please let me know if there is any further information that you need.
Kind Regards
Angela
Angela Roche Project Manager, Core Places, Building Level 14, Tower Three, International Towers Sydney Exchange Place, 300 Barangaroo Avenue, Barangaroo NSW 2000 M +61 401 715 176 [email protected] | www.lendlease.com
Find out more about Core Places
1 9-19 Elizabeth Street, Sydney – Demolition Works • Construction Heritage Management Plan
City of Sydney
As part of required consultation with the City of Sydney, this CHMP was presented to the City of Sydney (heritage officer Hui Wang and planner Shannon Rickersey) on 22 August 2018. At the meeting, City of Sydney made comment on several issues, which are listed below with the response provided by Lendlease:
City of Sydney (stakeholder) response Lendlease / CHMP outcome
The treatment of the existing links between the Preconstruction Low Impact Works documents two buildings should be clarified were forwarded to City of Sydney as reference documents and are included in the CHMP as Appendix C.
The protection of the fabric and openings in the The protection of heritage fabric adjacent to the retained heritage buildings should be clarified existing openings at the links between the two buildings is detailed the TKD Architects drawings included in the Preconstruction Low Impact Works application. The TKD Drawings are included as Appendix C of this CHMP.
Protection of trachyte kerbs to Elizabeth Street is No demolition traffic will require access to required during demolition of 9-19 Elizabeth Elizabeth Street. Demolition traffic associated with Street. the demolition of 9-19 Elizabeth Street will use the existing site entrances on Castlereagh Street, where existing protective measures are in place for the trachyte kerbs.
Lendlease provided the Construction Heritage Management Plan and the TKD Architects drawings from the Preconstruction Low Impact Works application to City of Sydney for review after the meeting on 22 August 2018, and requested comments.
Lendlease followed up with email requests for comments on 3 September, 7 September and 14 September (copies of email correspondence between Lendlease and City of Sydney are included in this appendix as a record of the stakeholder consultation process).
City of Sydney (Tony Smith, Urban Design and Heritage Manager) responded on 17 September and confirmed that the issues raised by City of Sydney at the briefing meeting of 22 August had been ‘taken on board by your team’ and that City of Sydney does ‘not have any additional comments to make’.
Tanner Kibble Denton Architects November 2018 • Issue D B-2 Roche, Angela
From: Tony Smith
Dear Angela,
I’ve discussed this with Hui Wang.
Hui and Shannon had a meeting with the project team and TDK on 22/8/2018.
They made comments in the meeting on issues including: • existing link between the two buildings; • protection of the fabric and openings in the retained heritage buildings; and • protection of trachyte kerbs.
These comments were taken on board by your team and we do not have any additional comments to make.
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this document.
Regards,
Tony Smith Urban Design & Heritage Mgr Planning Assessments
____
Telephone: +612 9265 9461 cityofsydney.nsw.gov.au
1 From: Roche, Angela
Shannon/Tony
Following on from the emails below, can we finalise the consultation process with the CoS for the Martin Place Metro Construction Heritage Management Plan for the demolition of 9-19 Elizabeth St?
Kind Regards
Angela
Angela Roche Project Manager, Core Places, Building Level 14, Tower Three, International Towers Sydney Exchange Place, 300 Barangaroo Avenue, Barangaroo NSW 2000 M +61 401 715 176 [email protected] | www.lendlease.com
Find out more about Core Places
From: Roche, Angela Sent: Friday, 7 September 2018 10:36 AM To: [email protected] 2 Cc: Holly Rhoades
Shannon
Hope your well, I just wanted to check and see if there is any comments on the Heritage Management Plan, that was submitted on the 22.08.18.
When we met you indicated CoS would respond with comments if any, in approx. a week, just want to make sure I have not missed any advice.
Many Thanks
Angela
Angela Roche Project Manager, Core Places, Building Level 14, Tower Three, International Towers Sydney Exchange Place, 300 Barangaroo Avenue, Barangaroo NSW 2000 M +61 401 715 176 [email protected] | www.lendlease.com
Find out more about Core Places
From: Roche, Angela Sent: Monday, 3 September 2018 10:25 AM To: '[email protected]'
Shannon
3 Good Morning. Just wanted to touch base and see how the review of the Heritage Management plan is going?
Let me know if you need anything further from my end.
Kind Regards
Angela
Angela Roche Project Manager, Core Places, Building Level 14, Tower Three, International Towers Sydney Exchange Place, 300 Barangaroo Avenue, Barangaroo NSW 2000 M +61 401 715 176 [email protected] | www.lendlease.com
Find out more about Core Places
From: Roche, Angela Sent: Wednesday, 22 August 2018 3:11 PM To: [email protected] Cc: Phil Ransom (MacCap)
Shannon and Hui
Further to our meeting this morning please find attached the Heritage Management Plan for your review.
I have also attached the interconnection infill drawings for information only as they are not part of the scope of this demolition CHMP.
4 Pursuant of condition C3 of the Critical State Significant Infrastructure Approval SSI 15_7400 the Construction Environmental Management Plan Subplan for Heritage Management is to be prepared in consultation with the CoS.
I have also attached the CNVIS FYI as this is read in conjunction with the CNVMP, however is not part of the required consultation under the consent.
I will send these over 2 emails due to the file size.
Please let me know if there is any further info you need.
Kind Regards
Angela
Angela Roche Project Manager, Core Places, Building Level 14, Tower Three, International Towers Sydney Exchange Place, 300 Barangaroo Avenue, Barangaroo NSW 2000 M +61 401 715 176 [email protected] | www.lendlease.com
Find out more about Core Places
This email and any attachments are confidential and may also contain copyright material of the Lendlease Group. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify us immediately and delete all copies of this message. You must not copy, use, disclose, distribute or rely on the information contained in it. Copying or use of this communication or information in it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Contracts cannot be concluded with the Lendlease Group nor service effected by email. None of the staff of the Lendlease Group are authorised to enter into contracts on behalf of any member of the Lendlease Group in this manner. The fact that this communication is in electronic form does not constitute our consent to conduct transactions by electronic means or to use or accept electronic records or electronic signatures. Confidentiality and legal privilege attached to this communication are not waived or lost by reason of mistaken delivery to you. Lendlease does not guarantee that this email or the attachment(s) are unaffected by computer virus, corruption or other defects and accepts no liability for any damage caused by this email or its attachments due to viruses, interception, corruption or unauthorised access. Lendlease Group may monitor email traffic data and also the content of email for the purposes of security and staff training. Please note that our servers may not be located in your country. A list of Lendlease Group entities can be found here.
5 ______This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for the use of the addressee(s) and may contain information that is confidential or subject to legal privilege. If you receive this email and you are not the addressee (or responsible for delivery of the email to the addressee), please note that any copying, distribution or use of this email is prohibited and as such, please disregard the contents of the email, delete the email and notify the sender immediately. ______
6 9-19 Elizabeth Street, Sydney – Demolition Works • Construction Heritage Management Plan
APPENDIX C DESIGN FOR THE INFILL OF THE FIVE INTER-CONNECTING OPENINGS BETWEEN 9-19 ELIZABETH STREET AND 50 MARTIN PLACE
Architectural drawings prepared by Tanner Kibble Denton Architects, July 2017:
Drawing No. (revision) Drawing Title
- AR.TD.0000 (P4) Cover sheet and site plan - AR.TD.0001 (P4) Location plan and photo - AR.TD.0002 (P4) Level 1 proposed infill – plan and elevation - AR.TD.0003 (P4) Level 3 proposed infill – plan and elevation - AR.TD.0004 (P4) Level 4 proposed infill – plan and elevation - AR.TD.0005 (P4) Level 5 proposed infill – plan and elevation - AR.TD.0006 (P4) Level 7 proposed infill – plan and elevation - AR.TD.0007 (P4) Schedule of Wall Types and Finishes
These documents have been submitted to DP&E as part of the Pre-Construction Low Impact Works Package, which was approved by DP&E on 4 September 2018 (approval letter provided for information). The works are currently underway. The works are not covered by this CHMP, but the TKD Architects drawings are included as Appendix C for information.
Tanner Kibble Denton Architects November 2018 • Issue D C-1 50 MARTIN PLACE - 9-19 ELIZABETH STREET INTERCONNECTING EXIT DOOR WORKS
50 MARTIN PLACE, SYDNEY MACQUARIE BANK
TENDER DOCUMENTATION
ARCHITECTURAL
Drawing No. Drawing Title Scale
AR.TD.0000 COVER SHEET AND SITE PLAN NTS AR.TD.0001 LOCATION PLAN AND PHOTOS OF DOORS 1:500 AR.TD.0002 LEVEL ONE - PROPOSED INFILL: PLAN AND ELEVATION 1:20 @A3 AR.TD.0003 LEVEL THREE - PROPOSED INFILL: PLAN AND ELEVATION 1:20 @A3 AR.TD.0004 LEVEL FOUR - PROPOSED INFILL: PLAN AND ELEVATION 1:20 @A3 AR.TD.0005 LEVEL FIVE - PROPOSED INFILL: PLAN AND ELEVATION 1:20 @A3 AR.TD.0006 LEVEL SEVEN - PROPOSED INFILL: PLAN AND ELEVATION 1:20 @A3 AR.TD.0007 SCHEDULE OF WALL TYPES AND FINISHES NTS
P4 REVISED TENDER ISSUE 16 /08/17 P3 REVISED TENDER ISSUE 07 /08/17 P2 REVISED PRELIMINARY ISSUE 21 /07/17 P1 PRELIMINARY ISSUE 11 /07/17 Project 50 MARTIN PLACE, SYDNEY 9-19 ELIZABETH STREET EXIT WORKS
Drawing Title COVER SHEET AND SITE PLAN
Proj. Dir Proj. Arch Drawn GP SM AP/SJZ Job No. Date Scale 170088 JULY 17 NTS Drawing No. Revision AR.TD.0000 P4
Tanner Kibble Denton Architects Pty Ltd
Level 1, 19 Foster Street, Surry Hills NSW 2010 Australia T +61 2 9281 4399 F +61 2 9281 4337 www.tkda.com.au 1 SITE PLAN - NTS TKDArchitects Tanner Kibble Denton 2 LEVEL 1 DOOR 5 LEVEL 5 DOOR - NTS - NTS
50 MARTIN PLACE - NORTH EASTERN STAIR 1 LOCATION PLAN - 1:500
3 LEVEL 3 DOOR 6 LEVEL 7 DOOR - NTS - NTS
P2 REVISED TENDER ISSUE 16 /08/17 P1 REVISED TENDER ISSUE 07 /08/17 Project 50 MARTIN PLACE, SYDNEY 9-19 ELIZABETH STREET EXIT WORKS
Drawing Title LOCATION PLAN AND PHOTOS OF DOORS
Proj. Dir Proj. Arch Drawn GP SM AP/SJZ Job No. Date Scale 170088 JULY 17 1:500 @ A3 Drawing No. Revision AR.TD.0001 P2 4 LEVEL 4 DOOR Tanner Kibble Denton Architects Pty Ltd - NTS Level 1, 19 Foster Street, Surry Hills NSW 2010 Australia T +61 2 9281 4399 F +61 2 9281 4337 www.tkda.com.au TKDArchitects Tanner Kibble Denton TILE TYPES
LEGEND
2 ELEVATION - 1:20 @ A3 GENERAL NOTES
P4 REVISED TENDER ISSUE 16 /08/17 P3 REVISED TENDER ISSUE 07 /08/17 P2 REVISED PRELIMINARY ISSUE 21 /07/17 P1 PRELIMINARY ISSUE 11 /07/17 Project 50 MARTIN PLACE, SYDNEY 9-19 ELIZABETH STREET EXIT WORKS
Drawing Title LEVEL ONE - PROPOSED INFILL PLAN AND ELEVATION
Proj. Dir Proj. Arch Drawn GP SM AP/SJZ Job No. Date Scale 170088 JULY 17 1:20 @ A3 Drawing No. Revision AR.TD.0002 P4
Tanner Kibble Denton Architects Pty Ltd
Level 1, 19 Foster Street, Surry Hills NSW 2010 Australia T +61 2 9281 4399 F +61 2 9281 4337 www.tkda.com.au
1 PLAN TKDArchitects - 1:20 @ A3 Tanner Kibble Denton LEGEND
2 ELEVATION - 1:20 @ A3 GENERAL NOTES
P4 REVISED TENDER ISSUE 16 /08/17 P3 REVISED TENDER ISSUE 07 /08/17 P2 REVISED PRELIMINARY ISSUE 21 /07/17 P1 PRELIMINARY ISSUE 11 /07/17 Project 50 MARTIN PLACE, SYDNEY 9-19 ELIZABETH STREET EXIT WORKS
Drawing Title LEVEL THREE - PROPOSED INFILL PLAN AND ELEVATION
Proj. Dir Proj. Arch Drawn GP SM AP/SJZ Job No. Date Scale 170088 JULY 17 1:20 @ A3 Drawing No. Revision AR.TD.0003 P4
Tanner Kibble Denton Architects Pty Ltd
Level 1, 19 Foster Street, Surry Hills NSW 2010 Australia T +61 2 9281 4399 F +61 2 9281 4337 www.tkda.com.au
1 PLAN TKDArchitects - 1:20 @ A3 Tanner Kibble Denton LEGEND
2 ELEVATION - 1:20 @ A3 GENERAL NOTES
P4 REVISED TENDER ISSUE 16 /08/17 P3 REVISED TENDER ISSUE 07 /08/17 P2 REVISED PRELIMINARY ISSUE 21 /07/17 P1 PRELIMINARY ISSUE 11 /07/17 Project 50 MARTIN PLACE, SYDNEY 9-19 ELIZABETH STREET EXIT WORKS
Drawing Title LEVEL FOUR - PROPOSED INFILL PLAN AND ELEVATION
Proj. Dir Proj. Arch Drawn GP SM AP/SJZ Job No. Date Scale 170088 JULY 17 1:20 @ A3 Drawing No. Revision AR.TD.0004 P4
Tanner Kibble Denton Architects Pty Ltd
Level 1, 19 Foster Street, Surry Hills NSW 2010 Australia T +61 2 9281 4399 F +61 2 9281 4337 www.tkda.com.au TKDArchitects 1 PLAN- - 1:20 @ A3 Tanner Kibble Denton LEGEND
2 ELEVATION - 1:20 @ A3 GENERAL NOTES
P4 REVISED TENDER ISSUE 16 /08/17 P3 REVISED TENDER ISSUE 07 /08/17 P2 REVISED PRELIMINARY ISSUE 21 /07/17 P1 PRELIMINARY ISSUE 11 /07/17 Project 50 MARTIN PLACE, SYDNEY 9-19 ELIZABETH STREET EXIT WORKS
Drawing Title LEVEL FIVE - PROPOSED INFILL PLAN AND ELEVATION
Proj. Dir Proj. Arch Drawn GP SM AP/SJZ Job No. Date Scale 170088 JULY 17 1:20 @ A3 Drawing No. Revision AR.TD.0005 P4
Tanner Kibble Denton Architects Pty Ltd
Level 1, 19 Foster Street, Surry Hills NSW 2010 Australia T +61 2 9281 4399 F +61 2 9281 4337 www.tkda.com.au
1 PLAN TKDArchitects - 1:20 @ A3 Tanner Kibble Denton LEGEND
2 ELEVATION - 1:20 @ A3 GENERAL NOTES
P4 REVISED TENDER ISSUE 16 /08/17 P3 REVISED TENDER ISSUE 07 /08/17 P2 REVISED PRELIMINARY ISSUE 21 /07/17 P1 PRELIMINARY ISSUE 11 /07/17 Project 50 MARTIN PLACE, SYDNEY 9-19 ELIZABETH STREET EXIT WORKS
Drawing Title LEVEL SEVEN - PROPOSED INFILL PLAN AND ELEVATION
Proj. Dir Proj. Arch Drawn GP SM AP/SJZ Job No. Date Scale 170088 JULY 17 1:20 @ A3 Drawing No. Revision AR.TD.0006 P4
Tanner Kibble Denton Architects Pty Ltd
Level 1, 19 Foster Street, Surry Hills NSW 2010 Australia T +61 2 9281 4399 F +61 2 9281 4337 www.tkda.com.au
1 PLAN TKDArchitects - 1:20 @ A3 Tanner Kibble Denton P4 REVISED TENDER ISSUE 16 /08/17 P3 REVISED TENDER ISSUE 07 /08/17 P2 REVISED PRELIMINARY ISSUE 21 /07/17 P1 PRELIMINARY ISSUE 11 /07/17 Project 50 MARTIN PLACE, SYDNEY 9-19 ELIZABETH STREET EXIT WORKS
Drawing Title SCHEDULE OF WALL TILE TYPES AND FINISHES
Proj. Dir Proj. Arch Drawn GP SM AP/SJZ Job No. Date Scale 170088 JULY 17 NTS Drawing No. Revision AR.TD.0007 P4
Tanner Kibble Denton Architects Pty Ltd
Level 1, 19 Foster Street, Surry Hills NSW 2010 Australia T +61 2 9281 4399 F +61 2 9281 4337 www.tkda.com.au TKDArchitects Tanner Kibble Denton
9-19 Elizabeth Street, Sydney – Demolition Works • Construction Heritage Management Plan
APPENDIX D EXTERNAL PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD OF 9-19 ELIZABETH STREET
The photographic record was prepared by Tanner Kibble Denton Architects, July 2018, in satisfaction of Condition of Approval for CSSI 15_7400 Mod 3 (COA) E14 and submitted to City of Sydney. The consultation process with City of Sydney (as required by Mod 3 (COA) E14) has commenced. The photographic record does not require DP&E approval, and is provided as Appendix D for information.
Tanner Kibble Denton Architects November 2018 • Issue D D-1 24 September 2018
Macquarie Group Level 6, 50 Martin Place Sydney NSW 2000
Attention: Mr Phil Ransom, Senior Advisor
Subject: Sydney Metro & Southwest – Critical State Significant approval SSI 15_7400 MOD 3 Consent Condition E14 – External photograph of 9-19 Elizabeth Street, Sydney
In relation to the Sydney Metro & Southwest Critical State Significant approval SSI 15_7400 MOD 3, we enclose photographs of the exterior of the building at 9-19 Elizabeth Street, Sydney. The photographs are provided in response to consent condition E14:
Condition E14 In addition to the archival recording as required by Condition E13, the Proponent must, prior to demolition, undertake external photography of all buildings and structures to be demolished, in consultation with and to the standards of the relevant Council. The recordings must be made available to the relevant Council.
The photographs of the building are also included on the enclosed CD-ROM, in RAW and TIFF formats.
The building at 9-19 Elizabeth Street is approved to be demolished as part of the Sydney Metro & Southwest project. The building, completed in 1966 to the design of Alexander Kann Finch & Associates, is not is not included in any statutory heritage listings.
In accordance with Condition E14, please submit the photographs to the City of Sydney.
Yours sincerely TANNER KIBBLE DENTON ARCHITECTS PTY LTD
George Phillips Practice Director NSW Registration No. 7651
encl Location plan; external photographs CD-ROM containing external photographs
Tanner Kibble Denton Architects Pty Ltd | ABN 77 001 209 392 | www.tkda.com.au Sydney Level 1, 19 Foster Street, Surry Hills NSW 2010 Australia | T+61 2 9281 4399 Brisbane Suite 9A, Level 7, 141 Queen Street, Brisbane QLD 4000 Australia | T+61 7 3087 0160 Principals Alex Kibble, Robert Denton, Megan Jones, John Rose | Practice Directors George Phillips, Jocelyn Jackson, Melanie Mackenzie Senior Associates Ian Burgher, Angelo Casado, David Earp, Anna Harris, Emma Lee, Scott MacArthur, Renata Ratcliffe, Lachlan Rowe Associates Asta Chow, Paul Dyson, Sean Williams NSW Nominated Architects Robert Denton Registration No 5782 | Alex Kibble Registration No 6015
161035 180924 CSSI Condition E14 - Photographic Record.Docx Page 1 of 4 Key Plan
9-19 Elizabeth Street
50 Martin Pl
1 Location plan, not to scale. Source: Google Maps with TKD overlay.
Tanner Kibble Denton Architects Pty Ltd | ABN 77 001 209 392 | www.tkda.com.au Sydney Level 1, 19 Foster Street, Surry Hills NSW 2010 Australia | T+61 2 9281 4399 | F+61 2 9281 4337 Brisbane Suite 9A, Level 7 Queen Street, Brisbane QLD 4000 Australia | T+61 7 3087 0160
161035 180924 CSSI Condition E14 - Photographic Record.Docx Page 2 of 4 9-19 Elizabeth Street from the south-east (September 2018). 9-19 Elizabeth Street (July 2018).
9-19 Elizabeth Street from the north-east (July 2018).
Tanner Kibble Denton Architects Pty Ltd | ABN 77 001 209 392 | www.tkda.com.au Sydney Level 1, 19 Foster Street, Surry Hills NSW 2010 Australia | T+61 2 9281 4399 | F+61 2 9281 4337 Brisbane Suite 9A, Level 7 Queen Street, Brisbane QLD 4000 Australia | T+61 7 3087 0160
161035 180924 CSSI Condition E14 - Photographic Record.Docx Page 3 of 4 9-19 Elizabeth Street from the south (on the roof of 50 Martin Place (September 2018).
9-19 Elizabeth Street from the south (on the roof of 50 Martin Place (September 2018).
Tanner Kibble Denton Architects Pty Ltd | ABN 77 001 209 392 | www.tkda.com.au Sydney Level 1, 19 Foster Street, Surry Hills NSW 2010 Australia | T+61 2 9281 4399 | F+61 2 9281 4337 Brisbane Suite 9A, Level 7 Queen Street, Brisbane QLD 4000 Australia | T+61 7 3087 0160
161035 180924 CSSI Condition E14 - Photographic Record.Docx Page 4 of 4 Suite 2.06, Level 2 29-31 Solent Circuit Norwest NSW 2153 HBI Healthy Buildings International Pty Ltd A.C.N. 003 270 693 A.B.N. 39 003 270 693 Tel: 61 (02) 9659 5433 e-mail: [email protected] Web: www.hbi.com.au
Mr Stuart Hodgson 2 November 2018 Director Program Sustainability Environment & Planning Sydney Metro Transport for NSW PO Box K659 HAYMARKET NSW 1240 Ref: USP MP RevC CHMP
Dear Stuart
RE: Endorsement of MP-USP Construction Heritage Management Plan
Thank you for providing the following document for Environmental Representative (ER) review.
• Sydney Metro City & Southwest – Martin Place Station, 9-19 Elizabeth Street, Sydney – Demolition Works, Construction Heritage Management Plan, prepared by Tanner Kibble Denton Architects (Rev C 31/10/18).
The CHMP is required under Condition C3 of the Infrastructure Approval SSI 15_7400. As an approved ER for the Sydney Metro City & Southwest project, and as required by Condition A24(d) of the Infrastructure Approval, I have had the opportunity to review and provide comment on this document.
The document referenced is endorsed as appropriate for submission to the Secretary for approval as required by Condition C7.
Yours sincerely
Jo Robertson Environmental Representative – Sydney Metro – City and South West
Leaders in Environmental Consulting 1