Boston College Law Review Volume 9 Article 6 Issue 3 Water Use - A Symposium
4-1-1968 Australian and American Water Allocation Systems Compared Peter N. Davis
Follow this and additional works at: http://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/bclr Part of the Comparative and Foreign Law Commons, and the Water Law Commons
Recommended Citation Peter N. Davis, Australian and American Water Allocation Systems Compared, 9 B.C.L. Rev. 647 (1968), http://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/bclr/vol9/iss3/6
This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Boston College Law Review by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School. For more information, please contact [email protected]. AUS A IA A AME ICA WA E A OCA IO SYS EMS COM A E E E . A IS A d n r l pl nt , l l nd r n l h rt f t r h v pp r d n th t rn Un t d St t h h rt r l r l th r lt f nt n n ntr t n f t r d nd n th r p rt nt r v r —r v r h h, f r th t p rt, r h v l p ll t d. 2 h pr bl h ht n d b th f t th t th l t n f j r p p l t n nd nd tr l nt r h nl p rt ll d p nd d n v l b l t f t r ppl . In n r , l l rf nd r nd t r ppl r n d t nd t r t b p rt d t p th d f t.° M r v r, d nd n t r ppl f r ppl nt r rr t n, f r h dr l tr p r, nd f r r r t n l nd n rv t n p rp r xp t d t b n r n l r t ." h h rt r th t n h th r th x t n r p r n l n th E t d t t th t f t r ll t n h h l h d, r h th r th r t r r ht t h ld b b t t t d f r r p r n .° .A., v rf rd C ll , , Un v r t f W n n, 6 M b r, U.S. S pr C rt, W n n, tr t f C l b , nd U.S. t nt Off r G n r l Att rn , U.S. p rt nt f A r lt r t r r, Un v r t f W n n S h l r rl t d th El & n n, W h n t n .C. h rt l ll f r p rt f th t b b tt d t th Un v r t f W n n f r n S. . . d r . W r n th A tr l n l p rv d b th l t r f r b . h r, Un v r t f W n n S h l, nd b r f r G. S r, p rt nt f , In t t t f Adv n d St d , A tr l n t n l Un v r t . r h t A tr l n t n l Un v r t n 6 64 f n n d b llbr ht S h l r h p fr th U.S. Ed t n l nd t n. Add t n l r r h t th Un v r t f W n n n 64 6 f n n d b r nt fr th U.S. bl lth S rv nd fr th S h l. Op n n xpr d r n t n r l th f th U.S. p rt nt f A r lt r . h t rn Un t d St t , f r p rp f th rt l , n t f th t t xt nd n t rdl fr nd n l d n th t r f t t l n th t b n f th M pp v r. h r n r ll r rd d r p r n d tr n t t . h r n n t rn t t n th nl nd r n r ll r rd d pr r ppr pr t n d tr n t t . A f t rn t t r d l d tr n t t , f ll n b th r p r n nd pr r ppr pr t n. 2 S n , C ntr ll n Ind tr l W t r ll t n: C l r th r bl Gr n, .C. Ind. & C . . v. ( 68 .. S A l nb h, W t r—O r S nd M t I p rt nt t r l r , .C. Ind. & C . . v. , 4 0 ( 68 . 4 S n r ll . nd b r , . h n & . h r, r n A r t r ( 6 . p r n v th n r f l nd b tt n tr r ht t r n bl f th tr t r. h r ht rr l t v th th r ht f th r r p r n n r . S pp. 6 6 88 , nfr . Cf. r l , l f r W t r : r p rt ht , E n r , nd bl l t n, S t r l r . , 48 ( 6 r l , A M d l St t W t r C d f r v r n v l p nt, 22 & C nt n. r b. 0 ( . p r n h b n d d r t ll . Ell , S C rr nt nd r p d W t r ht l t n n th 64 BOSTON COLLEGE INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL LAW REVIEW
This article will examine in its latter section four water use doc- trines: (1) riparianism, (2) prior appropriation, ( temporal non- priority permit systems and (4) marketplace concepts. The major strengths and weaknesses of each will be compared in the light of five criteria: (1) security of water right fOr investment purposes, (2) efficiency of water use, ( flexibility in the allocative process to allow for economic growth, changing technology and changing demands, (4) protection of the public interest and the preservation of watercourse amenities, and (5) the allowance of scope for private initiative. In the first section of this article, the Australian system for licens- ing private diversions will be examined in detail as an example of a temporal nonpriority permit system that has been in effect for a length of time unparalleled in this country.? The Australian concepts as enacted in the three states within the River Murray basin (Victoria, New South Wales and South Australia) are presented both for com- parisons with American systems and as a fund of experience for use by commentators in the future.'
I. E AUS A IA WA E A OCA IO E E IE CE The water law of Australia has generated two main allocative systems: extensive, government-run irrigation areas, and licenses or permits for private diversions. A brief summary of the historical development of irrigation areas in the River Murray basin states will be presented first. Then the legal questions raised by abolishing com- mon law riparian rights and substituting a system of individual licenses will be discussed. Finally, the licensing statutes of the Australian states will be examined in detail. E t rn St t , 4 I . v. 2 , 2 4 8 ( 6 C. h r, W t rn Exp r n nd E t rn Appr pr t n r p l , n h f W t r All t n ( . b r & S. r n d. 8 . C. r & . G rd n, l t v Ch n f W t r n M h tt , n h f W t r All t n ( . b r & S. r n d. 8 , l p b l h d p r n W t r ht v. A r r Appr pr t n S t : A C p r n, 8 .U. . v. 20 ( 8 . l n n r t f r f r th ll t n f t r r ht pr t d b v r l n t . S , . ., M. G ffn , C p r n f M r t r n , nd Oth r M n f All t n W t r r , n W t r nd l n th S th t , 2 (In t t. f & G v t, S h l f , Un v. f G ., 62 . r hl t r, . v n & . M ll n, W t r S ppl : E n , hn l , nd l , h . III, I , I , II ( 60 M ll n, W t r nd r v t n M n : A Cr t , 2 . & E n. 4 ( . In t p r l n npr r t t , v rn nt n t r r ht , ntr t , l n , p r t , t ., nd r v th , th t r rd t t f n . h ld t h t n A r d pt d n M nn t n . M nn. St t. Ann. $§ 0 .4 A ( 64 . 8 h r n xt n v d n n A tr l n r A r n l t r t r f A tr l n ll t v t . t , C n d r t r , 2 t ( 44 . t th t th M rr v r t , n th th t rn p rt f th nt n nt, th nl z bl t th t h r v d xt n v n d v l p nt. 648 AUSTRALIAN AND AMERICAN SYSTEMS
A. t r l v l p nt f Irr t n n A tr l h pr bl f r l t n rr t n n n nv r n nt f r t r n t n t th Un t d St t . A tr l f d th pr bl v r rl . h ntr l r l r d" th rr t tr fl . W t r h b n xpl t d pr n p ll f r rr t n t f r t ppl nt t dr l nd r lt r , b t l t r d t n t f r f r lt r . S rf t r ppl h v b n t r d n h r r v r nd nv d thr h h ndr d f l f n d tr b t n n l . Irr t n r h v b n d v l p d n f p p l t n th l nd nd b f xt n v l nd r f r h . M t f th d v l p nt h t n pl n th b n f th v r M rr t . . h l Env r n nt f th v r M rr n.— h b n f th v r M rr , d l t d b nt r l n , h t h nt f 4 4,000 r l , r b t n v nth f th h l f th A tr l n nt n nt h M rr t h n v r nn l fl f b t 0 ll n r f t, d r v d fr nl p r nt f t t h nt. h r v r fl n rth t fr th Sn M nt n r r th v r fl t r v r n pl n , h r t r z d b n rr f n t n h nn l , n br n h nd b ll b n , t th l nd pl n h r , n r M ld r , t r , t j n d b t f t j r tr b t r : th M rr b d , p r ll l n t fr th t, nd th rl n fr th n rth t. It th n fl t nt