DOCSLIB.ORG

Camp Edwards Integrated Cultural Resources Management Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Camp Edwards Integrated Cultural Resources Management Plan Final INTEGRATED CULTURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PLAN REVISION FOR SITES AND TRAINING INSTALLATIONS OF THE MASSACHUSETTS ARMY NATIONAL GUARD FISCAL YEARS 2009–2013 Prepared for Massachusetts Army National Guard 50 Maple Street Milford, MA 01757 Prepared by engineering-environmental Management, Inc. 2751 Prosperity Avenue, Suite 200 Fairfax, VA 22031 703.752.7755 September 2009 Final INTEGRATED CULTURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PLAN REVISION FOR SITE AND TRAINING INSTALLATIONS OF THE MASSACHUSETTS ARMY NATIONAL GUARD FISCAL YEARS 2009–2013 Massachusetts Army National Guard 50 Maple Street Milford, MA 01757 SEPTEMBER 2009 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Final Integrated Cultural Resources Management Plan Revision Massachusetts Army National Guard INTEGRATED CULTURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PLAN REVISION FOR SITES AND TRAINING INSTALLATIONS OF THE MASSACHUSETTS ARMY NATIONAL GUARD FISCAL YEARS 2009–2013 SIGNATURE PAGE This Integrated Cultural Resources Management Plan (ICRMP) Update meets the requirements for ICRMPs set forth in Department of Defense Instruction 4715.3 Environmental Conservation Program and Army Regulation 200-1 Environmental Protection and Enhancement. APPROVING OFFICIALS Jeffrey G. Phillips DATE Colonel, US Army Chief, Environmental Programs Division Joseph C. Carter DATE Major General, Massachusetts Army National Guard The Adjutant General Eric N. Andersen DATE Acting Chief, Massachusetts Army National Guard Environmental Programs Division Thomas A. Harrop DATE Lieutenant Colonel, Massachusetts Army National Guard Construction Facilities Management Officer Francis B. Magurn DATE Colonel, Massachusetts Army National Guard Plans Operations Training Officer September 2009 i Final Integrated Cultural Resources Management Plan Revision Massachusetts Army National Guard THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK ii September 2009 Final Integrated Cultural Resources Management Plan Revision Massachusetts Army National Guard Executive Summary The Massachusetts Army National Guard (MAARNG) has been managing cultural resources for several years under a previously developed Integrated Cultural Resources Management Plan (ICRMP). This revised ICRMP builds upon the original ICRMP in terms of including those elements identified as significant issues by internal and external stakeholders during the review process for the previous ICRMP, but differs from the previous ICRMP in several respects. First, this ICRMP revision includes the following: The addition of new policies and regulations such as Army Regulation 200-1, Executive Orders (EO) 13287 (Preserve America), EO 13327 (Federal Real Property Asset Management), and EO 13423 (Strengthening Federal Environmental, Energy, and Transportation Management), Department of Defense Instruction 4710.02, the Department of the Army’s Program Comments on Unaccompanied Housing Structures and Ammunition Storage Facilities, and recent amendments to the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) and the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA) New guidance on the National Guard Bureau (NGB) Status Tool for the Environmental Program (STEP) program for project funding and data calls for the Army Environmental Database – Environmental Quality (AEDB-EQ) report, EO 13327, the Planning Resources for Infrastructure Development and Evaluation (PRIDE), the DoD Minimum Antiterrorism Standards for Buildings (Unified Facilities Criteria [UFC] 4-010-01), sustainability, and tribal consultation Introduction of new terminology for ARNG infrastructure: virtual installation, training installation, site, lot, and facility A focus on the results of the MAARNG cultural resources program over the past 5 years and how various successes and challenges have informed the goals and projects proposed for the program over the next 5 years. Streamlining of the standard operating procedures (SOPs) such that guidance specific to the responsibilities of the MAARNG Cultural Resources Manager (CRM) is minimized (this guidance is now included in a CRM’s Toolbox in Appendix I of the ICRMP revision) and instructions for non- environmental personnel are emphasized. Flowcharts have been added to each SOP to make them more comprehensible to the nonspecialist. Secondly, this ICRMP revision was developed from a template. The template was developed to standardize ICRMP format and content throughout the country and territories. Elements included within this ICRMP revision include the input provided by internal and external stakeholders during development of the previous ICRMP, additional input from stakeholders obtained through the review process for the ICRMP revision, and information provided by the MAARNG CRM. Internal and external stakeholders who participated in the development of both the original ICRMP and this ICRMP revision include MAARNG and NGB personnel, the state historic preservation office (SHPO), and representatives of American Indian Tribes. Department of Defense Instruction 4715.3 and Army Regulation 200-1, require installations to develop an ICRMP as an internal compliance and management tool that integrates the entirety of the cultural resources program with ongoing mission activities. As a component of the installation master plan, the ICRMP is the MAARNG commander’s decision document for conduct of cultural resources management actions and specific compliance procedures. This ICRMP is an internal ARNG compliance and management plan that integrates the entirety of the state’s cultural resources program requirements with ongoing mission activities. It also allows for ready identification of potential conflicts between the September 2009 iii Final Integrated Cultural Resources Management Plan Revision Massachusetts Army National Guard MAARNG mission and cultural resources, and identifies compliance actions necessary to maintain the availability of mission-essential properties and acreage. This ICRMP revision for the MAARNG is designed to support the military mission and assist individual installations in meeting the legal compliance requirements of federal historic preservation laws and regulations in a manner consistent with the sound principles of cultural resources stewardship. This ICRMP revision establishes priorities for the identification and standards for the evaluation of cultural resources within the MAARNG virtual installation, and provides a schedule to accomplish program objectives during a 5-year program. The ICRMP also provides a brief description of the MAARNG virtual installation, an overview of all known cultural resources across all MAARNG sites, the status of inventory and evaluation of resources at each site and training installation, and appropriate compliance and management activities for the next 5 years. The sites and training installations that comprise the MAARNG virtual installation are listed in Chapter 2 and Appendix D. Cultural resources under the stewardship of the MAARNG comprise archaeological sites and artifacts; historic buildings and structures; historic objects; historic landscapes; and Native American properties of traditional, cultural, and religious significance. To date, 101 archaeological sites have been recorded on MAARNG facilities: 69 at Camp Edwards, 26 at Camp Curtis Guild, 2 at the Methuen Readiness Center, 2 at MAARNG Headquarters at Milford, and 1 each at the Brockton and Westfield Readiness Centers. Of these, 43 require further evaluation to determine their eligibility for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). In addition, 165 historic buildings and structures on MAARNG installations have been assessed as eligible for listing in the NRHP, either individually or as contributing resources to potential historic districts. The Worcester Armory, home of the Massachusetts National Guard Military Museum and Archives, and the Lynn Armory are listed on the NRHP. No historic landscapes or Native American traditional, religious, or cultural sites on MAARNG facilities have been assessed for eligibility for listing on the NRHP. MAARNG operational and training activities have the potential to impact cultural resources. Management actions proposed by the MAARNG under the original ICRMP to avoid or minimize impacts to cultural resources included: Establishment of an MAARNG cultural resources management program Coordination of cultural resources management with the following: – Training and testing activities – Master planning – National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) impact analyses – Natural resources and endangered species management planning, including Integrated Natural Resource Management Plans and the Integrated Training Area Management program – Facility and operational requirements of the assigned units – Federally recognized Native American Tribes Establishment of funding priorities and program funds for cultural resources compliance and management activities in STEP Development of, as appropriate, programmatic agreements, memoranda of agreement, NAGPRA comprehensive agreements and plans of action, and NRHP nominations, and coordination of such documents with the ARNG and Headquarters, Department of the Army iv September 2009 Final Integrated Cultural Resources Management Plan Revision Massachusetts Army National Guard Continuation of consulting relationships with the federally recognized Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head – Aquinnah (WTGH-A) and the Massachusetts Historical Commission Development of databases and geographic information system (GIS) layers summarizing existing data on MAARNG facilities and cultural resources recorded within
Load more

Recommended publications
  • MS. 129: Camp Edwards Postcard Collection
    Camp Edwards Postcard Collection MS. 129 Sturgis Library Archives Town and Local History Collection Camp Edwards Postcard Collection MS. 129 Extent: 1 folder in a box with multiple collections (MS. 127-129) Scope and Content Note: The collection consists of 46 postcards showing a variety of scenes in Cape Cod’s Camp Edwards in Falmouth, Massachusetts. The images depict Camp life, buildings, training, troops, and more. Of special note is a miniature muslin mail bag with leather top which holds 8 miniature postcards. Historical Note: [The text of this note is excerpted from Wikipedia’s entry on Camp Edwards]. Camp Edwards is a United States military training installation which is located in western Barnstable County, Massachusetts. It forms the largest part of Joint Base Cape Cod, which also includes Otis Air National Guard Base and Coast Guard Air Station Cape Cod. It was named after Major General Clarence Edwards. It is home to the 3rd Battalion, 126th Aviation. In 1931 the National Guard deemed Camp Devens to be too small to meet their needs and began to look for a new training area, and two years later Cape Cod was identified as having a suitable environment to build a new camp. Camp Edwards was officially dedicated in 1938. In 1940, the U.S. Army leased Camp Edwards as a training facility as part of its mobilization strategy for World War II. The Army undertook significant construction which helped to expand Camp Edwards from a rustic military post to a small city, overflowing with new GIs. The new plan called for new capacity to house 30,000 soldiers and was completed in just four months.
    [Show full text]
  • J. Matthew Bellisle, P.E. Senior Vice President
    J. Matthew Bellisle, P.E. Senior Vice President RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Mr. Bellisle possesses more than 20 years of experience working on a variety of geotechnical, foundation, civil, and dam engineering projects. He has acted as principal-in-charge, project manager, and project engineer for assignments involving geotechnical design, site investigations, testing, instrumentation, and construction monitoring. His experience also includes over 500 Phase I inspections and Phase II design services for earthen and concrete dams. REGISTRATIONS AND Relevant project experience includes: CERTIFICATIONS His experience includes value engineering of alternate foundation systems, Professional Engineer – Massachusetts, ground improvement methodologies, and temporary construction support. Mr. Rhode Island, Bellisle has also developed environmental permit applications and presented at New Hampshire, New York public hearings in support of public and private projects. Dam Engineering PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS Natural Resources Conservation Services (NRCS): Principal-in- American Society of Civil Charge/Project Manager for various stability analyses and reports to assess Engineers long-term performance of vegetated emergency spillways. Association of State Dam - Hop Brook Floodwater Retarding Dam – Emergency Spillway Safety Officials Evaluation - George H. Nichols Multipurpose Dam – Conceptual Design of an Armored Spillway EDUCATION - Lester G. Ross Floodwater Retarding Dam – Emergency Spillway University of Rhode Island: Evaluation M.S., Civil Engineering 2001 - Cold Harbor Floodwater Retarding Dam – Emergency Spillway B.S., Civil & Environmental Evaluation Engineering, 1992 - Delaney Complex Dams – Emergency Spillway Evaluation PUBLICATIONS AND Hobbs Pond Dam: Principal-in-Charge/Project Manager for the design PRESENTATIONS and development of construction documents of a new armored auxiliary spillway and new primary spillway to repair a filed embankment and Bellisle, J.M., Chopy, D, increase discharge capacity.
    [Show full text]
  • Native Americans Ol'
    Native Americans ol' Clarendon, Vermont *This is only a report of my early findings. This is subject to charge as new evidence and facts arise. I\rly research has led me to cliscover two groups of Native Americiurs that could have resided in Clarendon and one other that may have simply passed through time to time. The tribe of Native l[mericans that has the highest likelihood of being in Clarendon isi the Mahican, specifically the subdivision Mahican proper. Their territory extended from Poughkeepsie, New York to Deerfield, I\4assachusetts, and extended flrttrest north in Rutland. It is important to mention that tlhey are not to be mistaken with the Mohegan tribes of Connecticut; however, they do have lineage witkr one another. As a side note, the Mahicans have lineage with the Lenape and ['equot. Other names for the Mahicans is as follows: Akochakanen (koquois name that means "Those who,speak a strangertongue"), Canoe Indians (Given by colonists), Hikanagi/Nhilcana (Given by the Shawnee), Laups (Given by the French), Orunges (,Given by a school textbook author, Chauvignerie, who rvas referring to a specific Mahican tribe in 1736), River Indians (Given by the Dutch), and Uragees (Again given by an author, Colden, in reference to a specific tribe of the.Mahicans 1747). Mahicans were hunters of southwestem and western Vermont. lheir langrllge belonged to the linguistic family of the Algonquian, spoken with an r-dialect. Sieldom did they settle anywhere in Vermont to stay due to the fact that they were typically hLunters, hotvever, it is not irnprobable that they had permanent selllements in Clarendon.r Historic territory of the |tdahicans l Swanton, John R., The lndion Tribes of North America,1953 pg.
    [Show full text]
  • Civilization and Sexual Abuse: Selected Indian Captivity Narratives and the Native American Boarding-School Experience
    ................................................................................................................. CROSSROADS. A Journal of English Studies 27 (2019) EWA SKAŁ1 DOI: 10.15290/CR.2019.27.4.05 University of Opole ORCID: 0000-0001-7550-3292 Civilization and sexual abuse: selected Indian captivity narratives and the Native American boarding-school experience Abstract. This paper offers a contrastive analysis of Indian captivity narratives and the Native American boarding-school experience. Indian captivity narratives describe the ordeals of white women and men, kidnapped by Indians, who were separated from their families and subsequently lived months or even years with Indian tribes. The Native American boarding-school experience, which began in the late nineteenth century, took thousands of Indian children from their parents for the purpose of “assimi- lation to civilization” to be facilitated through governmental schools, thereby creating a captivity of a different sort. Through an examination of these two different types of narratives, this paper reveals the themes of ethnocentrism and sexual abuse, drawing a contrast that erodes the Euro-American discourse of civilization that informs captivity narratives and the boarding-school, assimilationist experiment. Keywords: Native Americans, captivity narratives, boarding schools, sexual abuse, assimilation. 1. Introduction Comparing Indian captivity narratives and writings on the Native American board- ing- school experience is as harrowing as it is instructive. Indian captivity narratives, mostly dating from 1528 to 1836, detail the ordeals of white, Euro-American women and men kidnapped by Native peoples. Separated from their families and white “civili- zation,” they subsequently lived for a time among Indian tribes. Such narratives can be seen as a prelude to a sharp reversal that occurred in the late nineteenth century under U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Fort Meadow Reservoir
    FORM H . PARKS Af\i"D US(~S Quad Arca(s) Form No, Forms within LANDSCAPE FEATURES I Marlboro 1 l I I 914 ASSESSOR'S )-7, 16-1Y, 30-31 Massachusetts Historical Commission 80 Boylston Street Town Marlborough Place (neighborhood or village) ------ Address _ Historic Name Fort Meadow Reservoir Ownership: [X] private [X] public Type of Park or Landscape Feature (check one): ~~~~!:( [ ] park [ ] farm land [ ] green or common [ ] mine or quarry \ [ ] garden [ ] training field [ ] boulevard/parkway [X] other reservoir Sketch Map Date of Construction _ ....•.1.•.•8=47-=4••.8-------- Draw a map of the area indicating properties within it. Number each property for which individual Source MDC records; town histories inventory forms have been completed. Label streets, including route numbers, if any. Attach a separate Landscape architect unknown sheet if space is not sufficient here. Indicate north. Location of Plans lluknmVD Alterations/Intrusions (with dates) _ • D along shores of reservoir fairlgood Acreage ca 308 acres Setting At N central border of Marlborongh Organization for Marlboro Hist Comm extending NE into Hlldson Crossed by three Date 7/14/95 c3mcways, ringed with woods and cottages PARKS AND LANDSCAPES FORM VISUAL/DESIGN ASSESSMENT [] see continuation sheet Describe topography and layout. Note structures such as bandstands, gazebos, sheds, stone walls, monuments, and fountains. Note landscaping features such. as formal plantings, agricultural plantings, and bodies of water. If possible, compare current appearance with original. This "capacious reservoir" (Hudson, 230), nearly fifty years older than Marlborough's Millham Reservoir and the Metropolitan District Commission's Sudbury Reservoir, is a long, ca. 308-acre body of water on what was formerly a large wetland area on Fort Meadow Brook.
    [Show full text]
  • Species at Risk on Department of Defense Installations
    Species at Risk on Department of Defense Installations Revised Report and Documentation Prepared for: Department of Defense U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Submitted by: January 2004 Species at Risk on Department of Defense Installations: Revised Report and Documentation CONTENTS 1.0 Executive Summary..........................................................................................iii 2.0 Introduction – Project Description................................................................. 1 3.0 Methods ................................................................................................................ 3 3.1 NatureServe Data................................................................................................ 3 3.2 DOD Installations............................................................................................... 5 3.3 Species at Risk .................................................................................................... 6 4.0 Results................................................................................................................... 8 4.1 Nationwide Assessment of Species at Risk on DOD Installations..................... 8 4.2 Assessment of Species at Risk by Military Service.......................................... 13 4.3 Assessment of Species at Risk on Installations ................................................ 15 5.0 Conclusion and Management Recommendations.................................... 22 6.0 Future Directions.............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • University of Maine, World War II, in Memoriam, Volume 1 (A to K)
    The University of Maine DigitalCommons@UMaine General University of Maine Publications University of Maine Publications 1946 University of Maine, World War II, In Memoriam, Volume 1 (A to K) University of Maine Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/univ_publications Part of the Higher Education Commons, and the History Commons Repository Citation University of Maine, "University of Maine, World War II, In Memoriam, Volume 1 (A to K)" (1946). General University of Maine Publications. 248. https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/univ_publications/248 This Monograph is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UMaine. It has been accepted for inclusion in General University of Maine Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UMaine. For more information, please contact [email protected]. UNIVERSITY OF MAINE WORLD WAR II IN MEMORIAM DEDICATION In this book are the records of those sons of Maine who gave their lives in World War II. The stories of their lives are brief, for all of them were young. And yet, behind the dates and the names of places there shines the record of courage and sacrifice, of love, and of a devotion to duty that transcends all thought of safety or of gain or of selfish ambition. These are the names of those we love: these are the stories of those who once walked with us and sang our songs and shared our common hope. These are the faces of our loved ones and good comrades, of sons and husbands. There is no tribute equal to their sacrifice; there is no word of praise worthy of their deeds.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report of the Town Officers of Wakefield Massachusetts
    124tk ANNUAL REPORT TOWN OFFICERS OF WAKEFIELD, MASS. h inancial Year Ending December Thirty-first .Nineteen -Hundred and Thirty-five ALSO THE TOWN CLERK'S RECORDS WAR 7 1936 or THE BIRTHS, MARRIAGES AND DEATHS During the Year 1935 WAKEFIELD Town Officers, 1935-36 Selectmen V. Richard Fazio, Chairman D. Thomas Dinan, Secretary Charles F. Young George J. Evans Donald White Town Clerk Frederic S. Hartshorne Assistant Town Clerk Margaret V. Hurley Town Treasurer Arthur H. Boardman Tax Collector Carl W. Sunman Moderator Thomas G. O'Connell Assessors Hugh Connell, Chairman Term Expires March, 1936 Arthur C. Verge, Secretary " " " 1937 David Sliney " " " 1938 Municipal Light Commissioners Marcus Beebe, 2nd, Chairman Term Expires March, 1938 A. Francis Harrington, Secretary " " " 1936 " " Curtis L. Sopher " 1937 Water and Sewerage Board William B. Stantial, Chairman Term Expires March, 1938 " Aaron T. Butler, Secretary " " 1936 " " Sidney F. Adams " 1937 TOWN OP WAKEFIELD Board of Public Welfare Dennis P. Hogan, Chairman Term Expires March, 1938 " " Etta C. Stoddard, Secretary " 1937 " " Adelaide W. Boynton, Agent " 1936 ' " William C. Strong " 1937 " " Frank P. Wakefield " 1936 School Committee J. William O'Connell, Chairman Term Expires March, 1937 " " " Eva Gowing Ripley, Secretary 1937 " " " Mabel W. Sweetser, Treasurer 1936 " " " Thomas F. Kenney 1938 " " " Gardner E. Campbell 1938 " " " Harry B. Allman 1936 Trustees Lucius Beebe Memorial Library Hervey J. Skinner, Chairman Term Expires March, 1937 " Florence L. Bean, Secretary " " 1937 " Albert W. Rockwood " " 1938 " Dr. Richard Dutton " " 1938 " " Alice W. Wheeler " 1938 " Walter C. Hickey " " 1936 " " Arthur L. Evans " 1936 " Dr. Frank T. Woodbury " " 1936 " " John J. Round " 1937 Board of Health Wesley S.
    [Show full text]
  • 8​Th​ Annual Five College Queer Gender & Sexuality Conference
    th 8 ​ annual five college ​ queer gender & sexuality conference rd friday march 3 ​ ​ ​& th saturday march 4 ​ hampshire college franklin patterson hall ​ table of contents About 3 Navigating Campus 4 Accessibility 4-5 Media Policies 5-6 Friday Schedule of Events 6 Saturday Schedule of Events 7-8 Opening Speakers 8 Keynote Speaker 9 Featured Speakers 10-11 Friday Night Events 12 Clothing Swap 13 Raffle & Cake! 13 Friday Workshop Descriptions 14-15 Saturday Workshop Descriptions 16-21 About Our Presenters & Organizers 22-27 Special Thanks 28-29 Save the Date! 29 2 about The Five College Queer Gender and Sexuality Conference aims to offer an ​ accountable and supportive environment to explore a wide range of topics and their intersections, such as race, genders, sexualities, ability, class, kink, religion, survival strategies, and many more, in a specifically queer context. Presenters include Five College students, faculty and staff, off-campus educators, and nationally-known performers, activists, speakers, and scholars. The conference is meant to be a safer space for engaging, learning, and fostering community. We are always looking for ways to adapt and improve, with the intention of remaining an annual event, and we welcome your feedback and participation in future organizing. As we enter our eighth year we are grateful for the tremendous level of support we receive from students, faculty, staff and administration throughout the Five College Consortium. We are committed to making this wonderful conference accessible, and are able to offer this as a free public event because of the generosity and dedication of volunteers and donors from the Five Colleges and beyond.
    [Show full text]
  • A Case Study of the Closing of Fort Devens
    University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Doctoral Dissertations 1896 - February 2014 1-1-1998 Lifestyle management education : a case study of the closing of Fort Devens. Janet B. Sullivan University of Massachusetts Amherst Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations_1 Recommended Citation Sullivan, Janet B., "Lifestyle management education : a case study of the closing of Fort Devens." (1998). Doctoral Dissertations 1896 - February 2014. 5347. https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations_1/5347 This Open Access Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations 1896 - February 2014 by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. LIFESTYLE MANAGEMENT EDUCATION: A CASE STUDY OF THE CLOSING OF FORT DEVENS A Dissertation Presented by JANET B. SULLIVAN Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Massachusetts Amherst in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF EDUCATION February 1998 School of Education ® Copyright 1998 by Janet B. Sullivan All Rights Reserved LIFESTYLE MANAGEMENT EDUCATION: A CASE STUDY OF THE CLOSING OF FORT DEVENS A Dissertation Presented BY JANET B. SULLIVAN Approved as to style and content: C. Carey, Member ft SM-C+' ^/Sheila Mammen, Member Dean ACfQPMLEDGMENTS "Be All That You Can Be" is the Army's recruiting motto. I have been employed by the US Army since 1974. First, I was an Army officer; and now I am a federal civilian employee working as The Equal Employment Opportunity Officer at Fort Carson, Colorado.
    [Show full text]
  • OUR MISSION DCR’S Universal Access Program Is Dedicated to Providing Outdoor Recreation Opportunities in Massachusetts State Parks for Visitors of All Abilities
    DCR UAP Program Schedule Summer/FallAccess News 2019Page 1 OUR MISSION DCR’s Universal Access Program is dedicated to providing outdoor recreation opportunities in Massachusetts State Parks for visitors of all abilities. Accessibility is achieved through site improvements, specialized adaptive recreation equipment, and accessible recreation programs. Pre-registration is required for all programs. To pre-register, contact the providing organization. Get into the activity sooner by bringing your release form filled out: mass.gov/dcr/universal-access/release Our structured programs feature adaptive equipment, professional staff, and instruction and support. Friends, family, and companions are welcome to take part in our programs alongside participants with disabilities. Visit our website to keep up-to-date with our activities! mass.gov/dcr/universal-access Donations welcome! DCR’s Conservation Trust and Urban Parks Trust Fund accepts contributions to support and enhance outdoor recreation in Massachusetts for people of all abilities. Your tax-deductible donation will help provide access to our parks. Ask us about matching funds! To learn more, visit: mass.gov/dcr/universal-access/donate Checks should be made out to The Commonwealth of Massachusetts, noting that the funds are for the Universal Access Program (UAP), and sent to: DCR’s Universal Access Program P.O. Box 484 Amherst, MA 01004 Access News Page 2 Hiking program that travels around the state! Take a gentle hike with Stavros Outdoor Access. Date Location Adaptive equipment and staff assistance provided. June 20 George’s Island, Bring a lunch and enjoy nature activities, Boston Harbor scavenger hunts, letterboxing, and more. June 27 Great Brook Farm State Park, Carlisle Cost: $3/person, $12/family, $25/group July 11 Walden Pond State Reservation, Concord July 18 Mt.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report of the Adjutant-General for the Year Ending
    . Public Document No. 7 DOCS gij^ tommottttt^altlj of MaaHarljuB^ttfi '^ ' L L , ANNUAL REPORT ADJUTANT GENERAL Year ending December 31, 1928 Publication op this Document approved bt the Commission on Administration and Finance 600 3-'29 Order 4929 CONTENTS. PAGE Armories, List of 99 Register of the Massachusetts National Guard 101 Report of The Adjutant General 1 Report of the Armory Commission 7 Report of the Intelligence Section 10 Report of the Military Service Commission 8 Report of the State Inspector 10 Report of the State Judge Advocate 11 Report of the State Ordnance Officer 12 Report of Organization Commanders 32 Report of the State Quartermaster 19 Report of the State Surgeon 22 Report of the U. S. Property and Disbursing Officer 25 Retired Officers, Land Forces 60 Retired Officers, Naval Forces 95 ANNUAL REPORT. The Commonwealth of Massachusetts, The Adjutant General's Office, State House, Boston, December 31, 1928. To His Excellency the Governor mid Commander-in-Chief: In accordance with the provisions of Section 23 of Chapter 465 of the Acts of 1924, I hereby submit the Annual Report of the Massachusetts Volunteer Militia for the year ending December 31, 1928. Appended are the reports of the Chiefs of Departments, Staff Corps, Armory Commission, and organization commanders. Enrolled Militia. On December 31, 1928, the total enrolled militia of the Commonwealth was 731,288, a loss of 1,195 over 1927. National Guard. The organization of the Massachusetts National Guard remains the same as last year. The restrictions imposed by Congress and the Militia Bureau still remain and prevent any increase in numbers in the Guard.
    [Show full text]