DOCSLIB.ORG

Kazakhstan's Dramatic Development Over Two Decades

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Kazakhstan's Dramatic Development Over Two Decades 4 The Japan Times Monday, DeceMber 16, 2013 Kazakhstan independence day kazakhstan’s dramatic development over two decades Erlan Idrissov growth on the environment. foreign mInIstEr of kazakhstan We are strongly committed to sustainable growth policies. We Located on China’s western bor- also remember that the Soviet der, Kazakhstan is geographical- Union’s disregard for the results ly distant from Japan, but rela- of nuclear testing led to negative tions continue to become closer outcomes. as our bilateral trade grows at a Like Japan, but in a different very healthy rate. our ties are way, we have suffered greatly developing as part of Kazakh- from the effects of nuclear stan’s increasing focus on asia weapons. one of President in response to the rising politi- nazarbayev’s first decrees was cal and economic weight of the to close the nuclear testing site region. at Semipalatinsk where 450 Japan is an important prior- nuclear tests took place over 40 ity for us and we see excellent years, causing suffering to an es- opportunities for the further timated 1.5 million people. Ka- expansion of the relationship, zakhstan then voluntarily gave particularly in the area of the up its massive nuclear arsenal, economy. Japanese technology the world’s fourth largest, and is going to play an important role began to work tirelessly with in the industrial modernization other nations to destroy exist- of Kazakhstan. For example, we ing nuclear weapons and to ban see excellent prospects for using their manufacture. Japanese technologies for en- In 2009, in recognition of Ka- ergy- and water-saving. zakhstan’s contribution to non- before describing our rela- proliferation, the United Nations tions further, it is important to declared aug. 29 — the day we give Japanese readers a flavor shut down Semipalatinsk — In- of Kazakhstan and the dramat- ternational Day against Nuclear ic development that we have Tests. experienced over the past two Kazakhstan is home to over decades. Since we are a relative 130 ethnic groups with dozens of newcomer to the international religions that coexist peacefully, scene, it is hardly surprising a feature of our history but also that people know less about us Multilateral cooperation: Foreign Minister of Kazakhstan Erlan a reflection of our commitment and our country compared to Idrissov speaks during the general debate Sept. 27 of the 68th to interethnic and interreligious others. session of the United Nations General Assembly at U.N. concord. Contemporary view: In a short period of time, the capital of Kazakhstan Astana has become one of the new centers of I often have to point out that Headquarters in New York. embassy of kazakhstan We have continued that tradi- international diplomacy. It hosts summits and major events of a global scale. embassy of kazakhstan we are the largest landlocked tion by convening international country in the world located on economy that is a generator of knowledge economy. congresses of religious leaders in asia to manage the diverse country’s long-term prosperity. ridor linking China with Europe creating an enhanced framework a territory five times the size of stability and growth in central Kazakhstan’s economy is the and working closely with inter- security challenges facing the as the largest landlocked and are part of the project to for cooperation in areas such as France. We have a population of asia. Our commitment to social, largest in central asia and its national organizations. In 2010 region. These threats range from country in the world, we have a build a 8,445-km modern high- peacekeeping and democracy, 17 million people and are rich in political and economic reform growth rate is among the highest we chaired the Organization for proliferation of weapons of mass strong interest in having the best way linking Western China with the economy, intraregional co- natural resources, including oil. has made us a key ally and trade in the world. Thanks to our com- Security and Cooperation in Eu- destruction to separatism, ter- possible access to global mar- Western europe with nearly operation in the central asia We are descended from nomads partner with Europe, the United mitment to the rule of law and rope and hosted this body’s first rorism and extremism, disputes kets, including to our south. The 2,800 km passing through Ka- region and addressing intrare- who controlled a vast area in the States, russia, china, India and political stability, Kazakhstan summit in 11 years in our capi- over water and energy resources, stabilization of Afghanistan and zakhstan. We are at the heart gional disparities. heart of central asia, and this other Asian countries in a strate- has been a magnet for foreign tal, Astana. as well as organized crime, illegal its pursuit of harmonious rela- of efforts to build a new “Silk There has been notable re- experience is at the heart of our gically vital part of the world. investors, attracting more than our chairmanship of the migration, drug trafficking and tions with its neighbors are an road” of trade routes across cent progress in terms of eco- diplomacy. We seek friendship Under the leadership of Presi- $170 billion in foreign direct in- council of Foreign Ministers of others. important part of that process. central asia. new energy links nomic development between and cooperation in all directions dent Nursultan Nazarbayev who vestment since 1993, which is 80 the Organization of Islamic Co- Thanks to our economic suc- So too is the normalization of are being established between Kazakhstan and Japan, and as part of a balanced, multivec- guided Kazakhstan through in- percent of all foreign investment operation in 2011-12 was a vivid cess, we have transformed our- Iran’s relations with the interna- central Asia and China, includ- there is a number of other ob- tor policy. dependence to its position today, in Central Asia. testament of that policy, focused selves from a beneficiary of aid tional community. ing from Kazakhstan. vious synergies between us. It is only 22 years ago that Ka- we have kept to a path of gradual Since independence, our GdP in this case on promoting better to a donor country, offering as- The situation in afghanistan Kazakhstan’s fruitful and pro- Japan’s leadership in the devel- zakhstan became an indepen- reforms, starting with economic per capita has grown sixteen- understanding between predom- sistance to Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and its potential consequences ductive relationship with Japan opment and introduction of in- dent country when the political liberalization and moving only to fold from $700 to $12,000. GdP inantly Muslim countries and the afghanistan and famine-stricken for the wider region are the is an excellent example of our novative technologies presents map of eurasia changed over- political modernization once we growth averaged 10 percent per rest of the world. Somalia. clearest reminder that these se- policy of international integra- great opportunities for future night after the dissolution of the had achieved economic stability. year from 1999 to 2007. It grew We have consistently pursued We have also made progress curity problems are real and re- tion. This relationship has also collaboration with Kazakhstan, Soviet Union. From the beginning, we de- 7.5 percent in 2011, 5.8 percent multilateral cooperation. at our toward democracy by holding quire coordinated approaches by delivered significant results in given our commitment to mod- There was little time for re- cided to use our vast natural in 2012 and is on target to reach initiative, new organizations democratic elections, open- countries in its neighborhood to strengthening peace and security ernize our economy and reduce joicing as our newborn country resources to improve the living 6 percent in 2013. have taken shape to foster great- ing the way for free media, and be managed effectively. across the Asia-Pacific region. our dependence on raw materi- experienced the full force of the standards of each and every citi- Kazakhstan was listed 49th er cooperation, including the developing a structure for mul- While asia has enormous Japan is one of Kazakhstan’s als exports. our economy will breakdown of the Soviet eco- zen. Revenues from oil produc- in the World Bank/IFc’s “doing 24-country Conference on Inter- tiple political parties to work human and natural resources key strategic partners in Asia. We only be able to develop with nomic system. Within months, tion, for example, have benefited business 2013” report that com- action and Confidence-building actively in our national and lo- that have made it a powerhouse have worked together closely on strong investment in the best 40 percent of the population was all of our 17 million citizens. Ed- pares regulation for domestic Measures in asia. The security- cal legislatures. We are commit- of economic growth in recent a multilateral basis in many in- technologies. Tokyo is also a living below the poverty line and ucation and social welfare have companies across 185 econo- building initiative brings to- ted to developing a competitive decades, we see it marked by ternational organizations such as global financial center, and Ka- inflation reached almost 3,000 always been top priorities and, mies. In the World economic gether 24 countries, accounting multiparty system as foreseen stark contradictions: dynamic the U.n., IAEA, IMF, World Bank zakhstan is ready and eager to percent. since 1994, average income per Forum’s latest annual report on for over 90 percent of the terri- by our Constitution. We have a economic development is often and Asian Development Bank. learn from Tokyo’s success in at the time, some external capita has increased twelvefold. global competitiveness pub- tory of Asia and 3 billion people.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Global Cleanout: an Emerging Approach to the Civil Nuclear Material Threat About the Author Acknowledgements
    Belfer Center Managing the Atom for Science and International Affairs John F. Kennedy School of Government Harvard University Global Cleanout An emerging approach to the civil nuclear material threat Philipp C. Bleek September 2004 Managing the Atom (MTA) Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs John F. Kennedy School of Government http://www.managingtheatom.org Harvard University [email protected] 79 John F. Kennedy Street Cambridge, MA 02138 http://www.ksg.harvard.edu/bcsia Contents About the Author ii Acknowledgements ii Executive Summary iii Introduction 1 The Threat: Vulnerable Material Poses Unacceptable Dangers 1 The Status Quo: Ad Hoc Responses Incommensurate with the Threat 3 The Precedents: Five Case Studies 4 Project Sapphire 5 Operation Auburn Endeavor 9 Project Vinca 13 The Romania Operation 18 The Bulgaria Operation 20 Imagining Worst and Best Outcomes 21 Policy Failure 21 Policy Success 22 Patterns from the Cases 22 Passivity in Site Identification 22 Incoherence in Site Selection 23 Sluggish Implementation 23 Varying Incentives Needed to Convince Facilities to Give Up Material 24 Allowing Russia to Stymie Progress 25 Failure to Effectively Engage Third Parties 25 The Solution: A Comprehensive, Prioritized, Empowered Program 25 Comprehensive Global Threat Assessment 26 Prioritized Global Implementation Plan 26 Coherent Program with Adequate Resources 26 Flexibility to Target Incentives as Needed 27 Diplomatic Engagement with Russia 27 Engaging Third Parties 27 Conclusions 28 Notes 28 Bibliography and Interviews 37 Sources 37 Interviews and Correspondence 39 Global Cleanout: An Emerging Approach To The Civil Nuclear Material Threat About the Author Acknowledgements Philipp C. Bleek will be pursuing doctoral stud- The author gratefully acknowledges research ies at Georgetown’s Department of Govern- support from Harvard University’s Belfer Center ment beginning fall 2004.
    [Show full text]
  • The 2Nd Kazakhstan-US Convention
    WORKING TOGETHER FOR A SECURE FUTURE The 2nd Ka zakhstan- US Co nven tion 10 December 2 014 l Washington DC e t a t S f o t n e m t r a p e D S U : o t o h P H.E. Erlan Idrissov, Foreign Minister, meets with Hon. John Kerry, Secretary of State, in New York, September 2014 PRODUCED AND SPONSORED BY WORKING TOGETHER FOR A SECURE FUTURE The 2nd Ka zakhstan- US Co nven tion 10 December 2 014 l Washington DC Organized by the Embassy of the Republic of Kazakhstan in the United States with the support of the Council of Turkic American Associations Foreword A STRONG AND RELIABLE PARTNERSHIP His Excellency Erlan Idrissov Minister of Foreign Affairs Republic of Kazakhstan ’m very pleased that the Embassy of situated close to the epicenter of geopolitical Kazakhstan is hosting, to coincide with the tensions, is affected by these forces.” I celebrations of our country’s Independence To make the nation’s economy more Day, the second Kazakhstan-US Convention sustainable and diversified, he appealed on the theme of “Working Together for a to the people of Kazakhstan to “work hard Secure Future.” and unite our efforts on the way to a better This is a particularly good moment future” just as he outlined a major package to discuss the importance of the strategic of infrastructure investment over the next partnership between Kazakhstan and the four years, which, to some extent, can be United States. It is a partnership based compared with Roosevelt’s New Deal in on the regular political dialogue between scope and significance for our economy.
    [Show full text]
  • Carnegie Corporation of New York and Carnegie Endowment for International Peace Investments in Nuclear Security
    Backgrounder: Carnegie Corporation of New York and Carnegie Endowment for International Peace Investments in Nuclear Security Carnegie Corporation of New York: A History of Addressing International Peace, Security and Nonproliferation Challenges Andrew Carnegie’s Quest for Peace Andrew Carnegie believed in the power of international laws and organizations to stave off conflict and he trusted that future wars would be averted by mediation. He felt that war is wasteful, that diplomacy can resolve disputes without bloodshed and that nations can and should act collectively to prosecute cases of injustice when necessary. One of the first to call for the establishment of a “league of nations,” he argued that war might be eliminated if such a global organization were established with authority to settle international disputes through arbitration and the use of economic sanctions. In 1903, Andrew Carnegie supported the founding of the Peace Palace at The Hague, which today houses the Permanent Court of Arbitration, the United Nation’s International Court of Justice, and The Hague Academy of International Law. In 1910, in an effort to “hasten the abolition of international war,” he gave $10 million to establish the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, an organization dedicated to advancing cooperation between nations. And in 1911, he established Carnegie Corporation of New York to “promote the advancement and diffusion of knowledge and understanding,” a mission that was, in Carnegie’s mind, the surest path to permanent peace. Preparing for the Breakup of the Soviet Union In 1983, the year after David Hamburg became president of the foundation, during a period when international tensions were running high while international dialogue about how to address conflicts hardly rose above a murmur, the Corporation launched the Avoiding Nuclear War program.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Risk Assessment : Central Asia After Independence
    FOI-R--1292--SE July 2004 ISSN 1650-1942 User report Björn Sandström Nuclear Risk Assessment: Central Asia after Independence NBC Defence SE-901 82 Umeå SWEDISH DEFENCE RESEARCH AGENCY FOI-R--1292--SE NBC Defence July 2004 SE-901 82 Umeå ISSN 1650-1942 User report Björn Sandström Nuclear Risk Assessment: Central Asia after Independence 2 Issuing organization Report number, ISRN Report type FOI – Swedish Defence Research Agency FOI-R--1292--SE User report NBC Defence Research area code SE-901 82 Umeå 3. NBC Defence and other hazardous substances Month year Project No. July 2004 A6131 Customers code 2. NBC Defence Research Sub area code 31 N research Author/s (editor/s) Project manager Björn Sandström Nils Olsson Approved by Åke Sellström Sponsoring agency Scientifically and technically responsible Nils Olsson Report title Nuclear Risk Assessment: Central Asia after Independence Abstract (not more than 200 words) From a nuclear weapons policy point-of-view, the Central Asian states, which formerly were part of the USSR, has created a lot positive, such as declaring the region as a nuclear-weapons-free zone, in their first decade of independence. The nuclear risks are still considerable, but in general the situation has greatly improved compared to 1991. Concerns regarding nuclear weapons have been eliminated. In addition, only a limited amount of weapons-grade nuclear material remains. Today, highly-enriched uranium and spent nuclear fuel elements are probably of most concern. With efforts by international assistance programs, that material now seems reasonably well-guarded. Industrial and medical radiation sources are also on the list of nuclear, or rather radiological, concerns in the region.
    [Show full text]
  • Project Vinca: Lessons for Securing Civil Nuclear Material Stockpiles
    Project Vinca: Lessons for Securing Civil Nuclear Material Stockpiles PHILIPP C. BLEEK Philipp Bleek is a graduate student at Harvard University’s John F. Kennedy School of Government. He was previously an analyst with the Arms Control Association in Washington, where his portfolio included strategic and tactical nuclear weapons, nuclear testing, and threat reduction efforts in the former Soviet Union. Bleek recently published “Tactically Adept, Strategically Inept: Reflections on the 1999 Campaign to Ratify the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty” in the 2003 Kennedy School Review.1 y late afternoon the nuclear fuel, containing suffi- Project Vinca has the potential to inform broader “global cient highly enriched uranium (HEU) for several cleanout” efforts to address one of the weakest links in nuclear bombs, had been loaded onto a canvas- the nuclear nonproliferation chain: insufficiently secured B 2 7 sided flatbed truck. The technicians and scientists were civilian nuclear research facilities. shepherded into a nearby building.3 For the next dozen Understanding Project Vinca holds the key to design- hours, they waited under heavy security, with strict orders ing an effective program to remove nuclear material stock- not to contact friends or family and perhaps accidentally piles from the most vulnerable civilian facilities leak information about the impending transport.4 Then, worldwide. The operation illustrates both the challenges in the early morning hours of August 22, 2002, at a time and the opportunities faced by any viable cleanout effort. kept secret even from participating American nuclear sci- It also helps to explain why efforts to address this urgent entists, the transport operation began.5 Project Vinca, a threat have made relatively little headway, even after the multinational, public-private effort to remove nuclear terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, on New York and material from a poorly secured Yugoslav research insti- Washington so glaringly exposed the United States’s vul- tute, was entering its final phase.
    [Show full text]
  • Promoting Nuclear Energy and Non- Proliferation
    PROMOTING NUCLEAR ENERGY AND NON- PROLIFERATION The Contribution of Kazakhstan Since 1991, the Republic of Kazakhstan has been a leading force for eliminating nuclear weapons while supporting the safe, secure, and peaceful use of nuclear energy. This report looks at the reasons behind the commitment and the role, which Kazakhstan is playing the shape a way ahead in a contested world. Promoting Nuclear Energy and Non-Proliferation Promoting Nuclear Energy and Non-Proliferation THE CONTRIBUTION OF KAZAKHSTAN By Richard Weitz Second Line of Defense Contributor and Analyst1 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................................ 2 HISTORY .............................................................................................................................................................. 2 FIGHTING NUCLEAR TERRORISM AND PROLIFERATION ................................................................................... 5 RENEWING NUCLEAR ENERGY .......................................................................................................................... 13 NEXT STEPS ........................................................................................................................................................ 17 APPENDIX: INTERNATIONAL, MULTILATERAL AND BILATERAL AGREEMENTS ............................................... 20 Notes 1 The author wishes to thank Oscar Bonilla, Crystal Marshall, Jon Mitchel,
    [Show full text]
  • Project Sapphire
    ~ OF TH.B ~ PULITZER PRIZE 21 PROJECT SAPPHIRE he United States opened eleven new embassies in the far reaches of Tthe former Soviet Union in the year after its implosion, and a younger generation of diplomats volunteered for hardship assignments in remote outposts. Andy Weber was among them. On a long airplane flight, read­ ing the Wall Street Journal, he saw a page-one article with the headline "Kazakhstan Is Made for Diplomats Who Find Paris a Bore." The article described how Ambassador William Courtney was working out of a dingy hotel in the capital, Almaty, with phones so bad he often could not place a call to Washington. "America is busy," the operators would say. It sounded like an adventure, and Weber jumped at the chance. With tours in the Middle East and Europe under his belt, he asked the State Depart­ ment if his next assignment could be Kazakhstan. They signed him up on the spot. After Russian-language training, he arrived in July 1993 to take up the embassy's political-military portfolio. He found Kazakhstan's landscape a breathtaking tableau of steppe, lakes, forests and mountains, but Almaty was dismal. He threaded his way through fetid corridors without lightbulbs in the apartment blocks, and went to markets where pensioners stood forlornly offering to sell a vacuum tube.I Weber took a recently built house in the foothills of the Tien Shan Mountains that resembled a Swiss chalet, with a large fireplace, paneled walls and a sauna. When he needed to meet Kazakh officials, he invited 440 THE DEAD HAND Project Sapphire 441 them home for lunch or dinner.
    [Show full text]
  • December 5 10 Pm
    Former Senator Sam Nunn Co-Chairman, Nuclear Threat Initiative Kazakhstan: Reducing Nuclear Dangers, Increasing Global Security December 16, 2003 I want to thank our guests for joining us today in the United States Senate, where so much deliberation has taken place on how to stop the spread of nuclear weapons, and where the example of Kazakhstan has been welcomed and celebrated as a model of what we must see in the 21st century. President Nazarbayev is one of the greatest champions of nuclear nonproliferation in the world – not merely by his words, but – most importantly -- by his actions and his nation’s example. President Nazarbayev tells a very striking personal story in the prologue of his book Epicenter of Peace. As a child, he remembered having in his home an army rifle that had been taken by one of his relatives – a Kazak militiaman – in a rebellion against a regular Russian army unit in 1916. One day his grandmother said that the rifle had brought suffering – that it should be cast out of the house. So President Nazarbayev’s father took the rifle to the authorities, but not before removing the bayonet, which the grandmother ordered be made into a sickle. She supplied the handle that she made herself from her old spindle. As a young boy, the President used that sickle to cut hay. This childhood event – dismantling a weapon and building from it a tool of peace and commerce – foreshadowed the work of his adult life. It is the heart of the Biblical passage “they shall beat their swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruning hooks.” President Nazarbayev dismantled his nation’s nuclear weapons and out of that action built a friendship with the United States, an example for the world, and an opportunity for his people to move toward a more promising future.
    [Show full text]
  • Kazakhstan: Tested by Transition
    Kazakhstan: Tested by Transition by Kazakhstan: Tested Chatham House Report Annette Bohr, Birgit Brauer, Nigel Gould-Davies, Nargis Kassenova, Joanna Lillis, Kate Mallinson, James Nixey and Dosym Satpayev Kazakhstan: Tested by Transition Bohr, Brauer, Gould-Davies, Kassenova, Lillis, Mallinson, Nixey and Satpayev Lillis, Mallinson, Nixey Kassenova, Gould-Davies, Brauer, Bohr, Chatham House Chatham House Report Annette Bohr, Birgit Brauer, Nigel Gould-Davies, Nargis Kassenova, Joanna Lillis, Kate Mallinson, James Nixey and Dosym Satpayev Russia and Eurasia Programme | November 2019 Kazakhstan: Tested by Transition Chatham House, the Royal Institute of International Affairs, is a world-leading policy institute based in London. Our mission is to help governments and societies build a sustainably secure, prosperous and just world. The Royal Institute of International Affairs Chatham House 10 St James’s Square London SW1Y 4LE T: +44 (0) 20 7957 5700 F: +44 (0) 20 7957 5710 www.chathamhouse.org Charity Registration No. 208223 Copyright © The Royal Institute of International Affairs, 2019 Chatham House, the Royal Institute of International Affairs, does not express opinions of its own. The opinions expressed in this publication are the responsibility of the author(s). All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical including photocopying, recording or any information storage or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of the copyright holder. Please direct all enquiries to the publishers. ISBN 978 1 78413 375 7 A catalogue record for this title is available from the British Library. Printed and bound in Great Britain.
    [Show full text]
  • Perry Class Syllabus
    Living at the Nuclear Brink: Yesterday & Today International Policy Studies - IPS 249 – SYLLABUS Instructor: William J. Perry Course Overview: The development, testing, and proliferation of nuclear weapons will be covered, from World War II through the Cold War to the present. Emphasis will be placed on understanding the evolving role of these weapons, both militarily and politically. It will also examine controversies and opposition movements to nuclear weapons and their use. The course will feature numerous guest speakers from Stanford and beyond. Students will be required to write in-depth analyses of specific nuclear weapons policy questions. Following this course, students are expected to have a deeper understanding of the profound dangers these weapons continue to present to the world today, and to be motivated to work to mitigate these dangers in the future. Lectures Lecture 1 — Introduction; The William J. Perry Project William J. Perry This lecture will cover course goals and description of topics; description of the William J Perry Project, including the book, the summer program, educational project, and future plans Lecture 2 — Nuclear Weapons and World War II William J. Perry This lecture will cover the origins and scope of World War II. Particular emphasis will be placed on the last six months of the war in the Pacific including the fire bombings and the Battle of Okinawa; the decision to drop the bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki; Potsdam; the effect of the Red Army joining the war against Japan; and the Peace Treaty. Dr. Perry will include personal experiences from his time in the Army of Occupation.
    [Show full text]
  • Elbaradei, Who Along with the Agency Won a Nobel Peace Prize in 2005, Significantly Elevated the IAEA's International Profil
    1 Kazakhstan’s Developing Non-Proliferation Goals, Opportunities, and Challenges By Richard Weitz1 Kazakhstan has an admirable record of supporting nuclear and other nonproliferation initiatives. Upon gaining independence, Kazakhstan rapidly eliminated all the nuclear weapons and related infrastructure the new country inherited from the Soviet Union and joined the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty (N.P.T.) as a non-nuclear weapons state. In 1991, the government closed the Soviet nuclear test site at Semipalatinsk, where the Soviet military had conducted almost 500 nuclear tests. The Soviet Union’s collapse then left more than 1,000 ballistic missiles and some 1,400 nuclear warheads on the territory of newly independent Kazakhstan. Working closely with Russia and the United States, Kazakhstan eliminated its nuclear arsenal, partly handing it over to Russia and partly dismantling it under international supervision. That work was complete by 1995, by which time Kazakhstan had already joined the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty as a non-nuclear weapon state. It also transferred more than a half-ton of weapons-grade uranium to the United States. Kazakhstan has ratified the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty (C.T.B.T.) and has recently served as co-president, with Japan, of the ninth Article XIV C.T.B.T. conference. It also helped lead efforts to establish the Treaty on the Nuclear-Weapon-Free Zone in Central Asia, signed in 2006, symbolically in Semipalatinsk. Kazakhstan has also contributed to chemical and biological nonproliferation efforts. Since then, Kazakhstan has supported many other nonproliferation initiatives, including a promising new nuclear fuel bank facility. Coming years should see more Kazakhstani contributions to countering nuclear proliferation and enhancing nuclear security and safety.
    [Show full text]
  • THE HARD CASES Eliminating Civilian HEU in Ukraine and Belarus
    THE HARD CASES Eliminating Civilian HEU in Ukraine and Belarus William C. Potter and Robert Nurick Many countries received Soviet-origin highly enriched uranium (HEU) for civilian nuclear research purposes. Because of inadequate nuclear security at a number of the research sites, U.S. policy has sought to remove or otherwise safely dispose of their HEU stocks as quickly as possible. Although the pace of HEU disposition has accelerated significantly in recent years, several sites have posed formidable technical, economic, and political challenges. This article identifies the major obstacles to HEU removal at two key installations*Kharkiv in Ukraine, and Sosny in Belarus*and recommends a strategy for overcoming these impediments. Key components for a successful disposition strategy include: treating these cases with the urgency they deserve, expanding potential compensation packages, explicitly addressing the institutional and political issues involved, engaging high-level political leaders, working with third parties, and promoting these efforts as part of a nondiscriminatory initiative to phase out HEU in the civilian nuclear sector globally. KEYWORDS: Highly enriched uranium; Ukraine, Belarus; proliferation; civilian nuclear sector Highly enriched uranium (HEU) is the likely nuclear material of choice for terrorists seeking to fabricate the simplest kind of nuclear explosive. At least seventeen countries reportedly received HEU-fueled reactors and HEU from the Soviet Union for civilian nuclear research purposes. A number of sites in these recipient countries are at risk from the standpoint of nuclear security due to inadequate physical protection measures and practices. At such locations, removing the HEU and converting it to low-enriched uranium (LEU) usually represents the best option for protecting the material from loss or theft.
    [Show full text]