Tropical Cyclone Winston UNOSAT Damage Assessment Activities In
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Zorotypidae of Fiji (Zoraptera)
NUMBER 91, 42 pages 15 March 2006 BISHOP MUSEUM OCCASIONAL PAPERS FIJI ARTHROPODS VII NEAL L. EVENHUIS AND DANIEL J. BICKEL, EDITORS 7 BISHOP MUSEUM PRESS HONOLULU Bishop Museum Press has been publishing scholarly books on the natu- RESEARCH ral and cultural history of Hawai‘i and the Pacific since 1892. The Bernice P. Bishop Museum Bulletin series (ISSN 0005-9439) was begun PUBLICATIONS OF in 1922 as a series of monographs presenting the results of research in many scientific fields throughout the Pacific. In 1987, the Bulletin series BISHOP MUSEUM was superceded by the Museum’s five current monographic series, issued irregularly: Bishop Museum Bulletins in Anthropology (ISSN 0893-3111) Bishop Museum Bulletins in Botany (ISSN 0893-3138) Bishop Museum Bulletins in Entomology (ISSN 0893-3146) Bishop Museum Bulletins in Zoology (ISSN 0893-312X) Bishop Museum Bulletins in Cultural and Environmental Studies (ISSN 1548-9620) Bishop Museum Press also publishes Bishop Museum Occasional Papers (ISSN 0893-1348), a series of short papers describing original research in the natural and cultural sciences. To subscribe to any of the above series, or to purchase individual publi- cations, please write to: Bishop Museum Press, 1525 Bernice Street, Honolulu, Hawai‘i 96817-2704, USA. Phone: (808) 848-4135. Email: [email protected]. Institutional libraries interested in exchang- ing publications may also contact the Bishop Museum Press for more information. BISHOP MUSEUM The State Museum of Natural and Cultural History ISSN 0893-1348 1525 Bernice Street Copyright © 2007 by Bishop Museum Honolulu, Hawai‘i 96817-2704, USA FIJI ARTHROPODS Editors’ Preface We are pleased to present the seventh issue of Fiji Arthropods, a series offering rapid pub- lication and devoted to studies of terrestrial arthropods of the Fiji Group and nearby Pacific archipelagos. -
Report SCEFI Evaluation Final W.Koekebakker.Pdf
Strengthening Citizen Engagement in Fiji Initiative (SCEFI) Final Evaluation Report Welmoed E. Koekebakker November, 2016 ATLAS project ID: 00093651 EU Contribution Agreement: FED/2013/315-685 Strengthening Citizen Engagement in Fiji Initiative (SCEFI) Final Evaluation Report Welmoed Koekebakker Contents List of acronyms and local terms iv Executive Summary v 1. Introduction 1 Purpose of the evaluation 1 Key findings of the evaluation are: 2 2. Strengthening Citizen Engagement in Fiji Initiative (SCEFI) 3 Intervention logic 4 Grants and Dialogue: interrelated components 5 Implementation modalities 6 Management arrangements and project monitoring 6 3. Evaluation Methodology 7 Evaluation Questions 9 4. SCEFI Achievements and Contribution to Outcome 10 A. Support to 44 Fijian CSOs: achievements, assessment 10 Quantitative and qualitative assessment of the SCEFI CSO grants 10 Meta-assessment 12 4 Examples of Outcome 12 Viseisei Sai Health Centre (VSHC): Empowerment of Single Teenage Mothers 12 Youth Champs for Mental Health (YC4MH): Youth empowerment 13 Pacific Centre for Peacebuilding (PCP) - Post Cyclone support Taveuni 14 Fiji’s Disabled Peoples Federation (FDPF). 16 B. Leadership Dialogue and CSO dialogue with high level stakeholders 16 1. CSO Coalition building and CSO-Government relation building 17 Sustainable Development Goals 17 Strengthening CSO Coalitions in Fiji 17 Support to National Youth Council of Fiji (NYCF) and youth visioning workshop 17 Civil Society - Parliament outreach 18 Youth Advocacy workshop 18 2. Peace and social cohesion support 19 Rotuma: Leadership Training and Dialogue for Chiefs, Community Leaders and Youth 19 Multicultural Youth Dialogues 20 Inter-ethnic dialogue in Rewa 20 Pacific Peace conference 21 3. Post cyclone support 21 Lessons learned on post disaster relief: FRIEND 21 Collaboration SCEFI - Ministry of Youth and Sports: Koro – cash for work 22 Transparency in post disaster relief 22 4. -
EMS Operations Centre
TELEPHONE Contact EMS OFFICE Email NUMBER Person GPO Counter 3302022 [email protected] Ledua Vakalala 3345900 [email protected] Pritika/Vika EMS operations-Head [email protected] Ravinesh office [email protected] Anita [email protected] Farook PM GB Govt Bld Po 3218263 @[email protected]> Nabua PO 3380547 [email protected] Raiwaqa 3373084 [email protected] Nakasi 3411277 [email protected] Nasinu 3392101 [email protected] Samabula 3382862 [email protected] Lami 3361101 [email protected] Nausori 3477740 [email protected] Sabeto 6030699 [email protected] Namaka 6750166 [email protected] Nadi Town 6700001 [email protected] Niraj 6724434 [email protected] Anand Nadi Airport [email protected] Jope 6665161 [email protected] Randhir Lautoka [email protected] 6674341 [email protected] Anjani Ba [email protected] Sigatoka 6500321 [email protected] Maria Korolevu 6530554 [email protected] Pacific Harbour 3450346 [email protected] Mukesh Navua 3460110 [email protected] Vinita Keiyasi 6030686 [email protected] Tavua 6680239 [email protected] Nilesh Rakiraki 6694060 [email protected] Vatukoula 6680639 [email protected] Rohit 8812380 [email protected] Ranjit Labasa [email protected] Shalvin Savusavu 8850310 [email protected] Nabouwalu 8283253 [email protected] -
Setting Priorities for Marine Conservation in the Fiji Islands Marine Ecoregion Contents
Setting Priorities for Marine Conservation in the Fiji Islands Marine Ecoregion Contents Acknowledgements 1 Minister of Fisheries Opening Speech 2 Acronyms and Abbreviations 4 Executive Summary 5 1.0 Introduction 7 2.0 Background 9 2.1 The Fiji Islands Marine Ecoregion 9 2.2 The biological diversity of the Fiji Islands Marine Ecoregion 11 3.0 Objectives of the FIME Biodiversity Visioning Workshop 13 3.1 Overall biodiversity conservation goals 13 3.2 Specifi c goals of the FIME biodiversity visioning workshop 13 4.0 Methodology 14 4.1 Setting taxonomic priorities 14 4.2 Setting overall biodiversity priorities 14 4.3 Understanding the Conservation Context 16 4.4 Drafting a Conservation Vision 16 5.0 Results 17 5.1 Taxonomic Priorities 17 5.1.1 Coastal terrestrial vegetation and small offshore islands 17 5.1.2 Coral reefs and associated fauna 24 5.1.3 Coral reef fi sh 28 5.1.4 Inshore ecosystems 36 5.1.5 Open ocean and pelagic ecosystems 38 5.1.6 Species of special concern 40 5.1.7 Community knowledge about habitats and species 41 5.2 Priority Conservation Areas 47 5.3 Agreeing a vision statement for FIME 57 6.0 Conclusions and recommendations 58 6.1 Information gaps to assessing marine biodiversity 58 6.2 Collective recommendations of the workshop participants 59 6.3 Towards an Ecoregional Action Plan 60 7.0 References 62 8.0 Appendices 67 Annex 1: List of participants 67 Annex 2: Preliminary list of marine species found in Fiji. 71 Annex 3 : Workshop Photos 74 List of Figures: Figure 1 The Ecoregion Conservation Proccess 8 Figure 2 Approximate -
Ecological Restoration and Erosion Control in Ra Province Diagnosis and Action Plan
Ecological restoration and erosion control in Ra Province Diagnosis and action plan The operator that is in charge of the implementation of the RESCCUE project in Fiji under the supervision of both SPC and the Fijian Government is: The Institute of Applied Sciences, University of the South Pacific (Leader) Contact: Johann Poinapen e-mail: [email protected] phone: +679 323 2992 Landcare Research Contact: Suzie Greenhalgh e-mail: [email protected] phone: +64 1 9 529 7444 Wildlife Conservation Society Contact: Sangeeta Manguhai e-mail: [email protected] phone: +679 331 5174 Conservation International Contact: Susana Waqanaibete-Tuisese email: [email protected] phone: +679 331 4593 Fiji Environment Law Association. Contact: Aliti Kiji Vukikomoala e-mail: ; [email protected] phone: +679 7080997 Main author Date of publication Susana Waqainabete-Tuisese, Isaac Rounds and Bridget April 2016 Kennedy Front page photo: Tree nursery used to restore TC Winston damages, Ra Province (R.Billé, 2016) 2 TABLE OF CONTENT 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 5 2. Land degradation and deforestation ...................................................................................... 7 2.1 Extreme weather events: droughts and flooding......................................................... 7 2.2 Burning and Grassland fire .......................................................................................... -
Evaluating the Performance of Lmmas in the Districts of Korolevu-I-Wai, Dawasamu, and Nakorotubu
TECHNICAL REPORT: EVALUATING THE PERFORMANCE OF LMMAS IN THE DISTRICTS OF KOROLEVU-I-WAI, DAWASAMU, AND NAKOROTUBU By: Victor Bonito1, Ron Simpson2, and Fulori Waqairagata2 1 Reef Explorer Fiji Ltd.; 2 University of the South Pacific’s Institute of Applied Science NOAA Grant: NA09NOS4630017 Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION . 1 1.1 COMMUNITY-BASED MARINE MANAGEMENT IN KOROLEVU-I-WAI DISTRICT . 4 1.2 COMMUNITY-BASED MARINE MANAGEMENT IN DAWASAMU DISTRICT. 7 1.3 COMMUNITY-BASED MARINE MANAGEMENT IN NAKOROTUBU DISTRICT . 9 2. METHODS . 11 2.1 LMMA ASSESSMENT - KOROLEVU-I-WAI DISTRICT . 11 2.1.1 BENTHIC SURVEYS . 11 2.1.2 TARGET FISH SURVEYS. .15 2.1.3 HERBIVORY ASSAYS . 18 2.2 LMMA ASSESSMENT – NASINU VILLAGE, DAWASAMU DISTRICT. .20 2.2.1 TARGET FISH SURVEYS . 20 2.2.2 ALGAL BIOMASS SURVEYS . .21 2.2.3 HERBIVORY ASSAYS . 22 2.3 LMMA ASSESSMENT – NAMARAI VILLAGE, NAKOROTUBU DISTRICT . 23 2.3.1 BENTHIC SURVEYS. 24 2.3.2 TARGET FISH SURVEYS . 24 2.3.3 HERBIVORY ASSAYS. .24 3. RESULTS . 26 3.1 KOROLEVU-I-WAI DISTRICT. 26 3.1.1 BENTHIC SURVEYS . 26 3.1.2 TARGET FISH SURVEYS . 38 3.1.3 HERBIVORY ASSAYS . 51 ii 3.2 NASINU VILLAGE, DAWASAMU DISTRICT. .55 3.2.1 TARGET FISH SURVEYS. 55 3.2.2 ALGAL BIOMASS SURVEYS . 58 3.2.3 HERBIVORY ASSAYS . 59 3.3 NAMARAI VILLAGE, NAKOROTUBU DISTRICT. .60 3.3.1 BENTHIC SURVEYS . 60 3.3.2 TARGET FISH SURVEYS . 66 3.3.3 HERBIVORY ASSAYS. .70 4. DISCUSSION . .72 4.1 KOROLEVU-I-WAI DISTRICT. -
Fiji: Severe Tropical Cyclone Winston Situation Report No
Fiji: Severe Tropical Cyclone Winston Situation Report No. 8 (as of 28 February 2016) This report is produced by the OCHA Regional Office for the Pacific (ROP) in collaboration with humanitarian partners. It covers the period from 27 to 28 February 2016. The next report will be issued on or around 29 February 2016. Highlights On 20 and 21 February Category 5 Severe Tropical Cyclone Winston cut a path of destruction across Fiji. The cyclone is estimated to be one of the most severe ever to hit the South Pacific. The Fiji Government estimates almost 350,000 people living in the cyclone’s path could have been affected (180,000 men and 170 000 women). 5 6 42 people have been confirmed dead. 4 1,177 schools and early childhood education centres (ECEs) to re-open around Fiji. Winston 12 2 8 Total damage bill estimated at more than FJ$1billion or 10 9 1 almost half a billion USD. 3 11 7 87,000 households targeted for relief in 12 priority areas across Fiji. !^ Suva More than Population Density Government priority areas 51,000 for emergency response 1177 More densely populated 42 people still schools and early are shown above in red Confirmed fatalities sheltering in childhood centres and are numbered in order evacuation centres set to open Less densely populated of priority Sit Rep Sources: Fiji Government, Fiji NEOC/NDMO, PHT Partners, NGO Community, NZ Government. Datasets available in HDX at http://data.hdx.rwlabs.org. Situation Overview Food security is becoming an issue with crops ruined and markets either destroyed or inaccessible in many affected areas because of the cyclone. -
Tikina Nailaga Sustainable Development Plan 2018 - 2038 1
TIKINA NAILAGA SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 2018 - 2038 1 NACULA SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT PLAN Presented by Tikina Nailaga Development Committee Contributors Apolosa Robaigau, Rusila Savou-Wara, Kesaia Tabunakawai, Alfred Ralifo, Metui Tokece (WWF-Pacific), Tikina Nailaga Community Representatives Layout & Design: Kitione Roko & Kalo Williams Edited by: Vilisite Tamani & Amelia Makutu Finalised: July 2018 Funded by: Supported by: CONTENTS Acknowledgement 010104 Foreword 05 Summary 06 Vision/Mission/Objective 07 List of Thematic Areas 08 Background 09 Socio-Economic Background 10 The Process of Developing the Sustainable District Development Plan 11 Alignment to Fiji’s National Frameworks 12 Governance and Implementation Structure 13 Summary Costs for Thematic Areas 14 Thematic Areas and Activities 15 Annexes 30 Acknowledgement The Nailaga Sustainable Development Plan is the result of an extensive 5-year (2013-2017) consultation and collaboration process with invaluable input from the following donors, partner organisations, government ministries and individuals. The people of the United States of America through USAID and PACAM Programme and the people of Australia through Australian Aid Programme for funding the completion of this Tikina Nailaga District Sustainable Development Plan. The Government of Fiji, through the relevant ministries that contributed to the development of the plan i.e. The Commissioner Western’s Office, District Office Ba, Department of Land Use and Planning, Ba Provincial Office, Ministry of Education. the plan. World Wide Fund for nature Pacific Office, for leading the facilitation process during the development of Mr Jo Vale and Jeremai Tuwai , the two former Mata ni Tikina (District representatives) who played an important role during the community consultation process . The people of Nailaga District for their participation and contribution towards the development of the plan. -
Agricultural Terracing at Nakauvadra, Viti Levu: a Late Prehistoric Irrigated Agrosystem in Fiji
Agricultural Terracing at Nakauvadra, Viti Levu: A Late Prehistoric Irrigated Agrosystem in Fiji ROBERT KUHLKEN AND ANDREW CROSBY ROOT CROPS FORMED THE BASIS OF SUBSISTENCE in the majority of prehistoric Pacific Island agrosystems. Besides yams (Dioscorea spp.), the most important do mesticate was taro (Colocasia esculenta), an ancient cultigen, and one inextricably linked with the development of Oceanian societies (Greenwell 1947; Spier 1951). This starchy tuber was the staple food in the diet of many Islanders, and was fur ther infused with ceremonial and ritual significance. In Fiji, root crops such as taro are categorized in dietary typology as kakana dina (true food), and no meal is deemed complete without them (Pollock 1986: 108). Also, the presentation of huge amounts of food by subservient local groups in customary tribute to more powerful polities was commonplace and expected. Yams and taro, along with turtles, were the standard components of these mandatory contributions. As po litical integration and social stratification proceeded, tributary requirements in creased, thereby exerting pressure on food-production capabilities. Agricultural intensification-the increase of labor inputs to a given area of land-was generally induced by some combination of social and environmental factors. The process may have occurred on Pacific Islands for various reasons, including the necessity for greater yields to support growing populations; the cul turally determined requirement for surplus production; or simply the need to overcome micro climatic and agronomic constraints (Brookfield 1972). Whatever the impetus behind it, increased agricultural intensity often resulted in dramatic and durable modifications to the environment. Yam mounds became a distinctive feature of agricultural landscapes in certain parts of Oceania; and intensive taro production typically assumed several forms: raised beds or drained fields in coastal plains and wetland areas, and irrigated terracing along streams and on hillsides. -
Researchspace@Auckland
http://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz ResearchSpace@Auckland Copyright Statement The digital copy of this thesis is protected by the Copyright Act 1994 (New Zealand). This thesis may be consulted by you, provided you comply with the provisions of the Act and the following conditions of use: • Any use you make of these documents or images must be for research or private study purposes only, and you may not make them available to any other person. • Authors control the copyright of their thesis. You will recognise the author's right to be identified as the author of this thesis, and due acknowledgement will be made to the author where appropriate. • You will obtain the author's permission before publishing any material from their thesis. To request permissions please use the Feedback form on our webpage. http://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/feedback General copyright and disclaimer In addition to the above conditions, authors give their consent for the digital copy of their work to be used subject to the conditions specified on the Library Thesis Consent Form and Deposit Licence. CONNECTING IDENTITIES AND RELATIONSHIPS THROUGH INDIGENOUS EPISTEMOLOGY: THE SOLOMONI OF FIJI ESETA MATEIVITI-TULAVU A thesis in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY The University of Auckland Auckland, New Zealand 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract .................................................................................................................................. vi Dedication ............................................................................................................................ -
2010 Report on International Religious Freedom » East Asia and Pacific » Fiji
Fiji Page 1 of 3 Home » Under Secretary for Democracy and Global Affairs » Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor » Releases » International Religious Freedom » 2010 Report on International Religious Freedom » East Asia and Pacific » Fiji Fiji BUREAU OF DEMOCRACY, HUMAN RIGHTS, AND LABOR International Religious Freedom Report 2010 November 17, 2010 Prior to its abrogation in April 2009, the constitution expressly provided for freedom of religion. Current laws and policies contributed to the generally free practice of religion. The government generally respected religious freedom in practice; however, there was a decline in the status of respect for religious freedom by the government during the reporting period as a result of a ban on the annual conference of the Methodist Church and meetings of its 52 divisions, as well as the criminal prosecution of 27 members of the Church Standing Committee who resolved to go ahead with the 2009 conference despite the announced ban. The harassment of Methodists appeared to stem from the military’s disapproval of links between some church leaders and political parties critical of the military. There were isolated reports of societal abuses or discrimination based on religious affiliation, belief, or practice. The U.S. government discusses religious freedom with the government as part of its overall policy to promote human rights. Section I. Religious Demography The country is an archipelago of more than 300 islands with an area of 7,050 square miles and a population of 827,000. Most of the population is concentrated on the main island of Viti Levu. Estimates of religious affiliation were as follows: 52 percent of the population is Christian, 30 percent Hindu, and 7 percent Muslim. -
Country Profile
Country profile COUNTRY FACTS Fiji Capital Suva Main country facts Gained Habitat for Humanity in Fiji independence Habitat for Humanity started working in Fiji in 1991. Since then, in 1970 Habitat has helped over 69,500 people to build homes and hope through partnerships with governments, bilateral and non-profit Population Over 920,900 organizations and international volunteers. Habitat works on a range of projects throughout the country including disaster Urbanization 54.5 percent response and recovery through repairs and temporary housing live in cities when needed, construction or improvement of water and sanitation systems in rural and remote areas, and disabled Life expectancy 73 years access housing projects. In the financial year ended June 30, 2017, Habitat for Humanity Fiji has helped more than 4,500 Unemployment rate 5.5 percent families through disaster response and over 2,000 families in Population living 31 percent more than 55 communities through water and sanitation below poverty line improvements and built over 1,300 new houses to date. ---------------------------------------------- Source: World Factbook The housing need in Fiji An estimated 140,000 people currently live in substandard housing conditions in informal settlements, and the number has HABITAT FACTS increased by 5 percent from 2007 to 2012. Poverty and inequality continue to be a challenge. According to official statistics, 31 percent of the population lives in poverty. The rising When Habitat started in Fiji cost of living and disasters such as 2016’s Cyclone Winston 1991 increased the poor’s vulnerability. The most vulnerable households also lack piped water, adequate sanitation, Individuals served in FY17 830* electricity or rubbish disposal.