Minnesota Invasive Terrestrial Plants & Pests Center New Species

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Minnesota Invasive Terrestrial Plants & Pests Center New Species Minnesota Invasive Terrestrial Plants & Pests Center New Species Evaluation Lupinus polyphyllus Lindl. (Large-leaved lupine) Evaluated: A.C. Morey; Reviewed: R.C. Venette (1/15/20) OVERVIEW: Common names: bigleaf lupin(e), Washington lupine, marsh lupine, garden lupine, meadow lupine Synonyms: see Beuthin (2012) and CABI (2018) for varieties, cultivars, and synonyms Lupinus polyphyllus is a perennial legume (Fabaceae) native to the western U.S and Canada. It was introduced to the eastern U.S. (and Canada) as a garden plant, but is also used for soil improvement and animal forage. It has also been introduced to Europe, New Zealand, and Australia and is considered a problem outside of cultivation in many regions. Lupinus polyphyllus is the dominant parent of the popular cultivated hybrid known as Russel Lupin or L. x regalis. Some sources note that garden escapees are likely L. x regalis misidentified as L. polyphyllus due to the greater relative prevalence of the hybrid in commercial trade. MAJOR KNOWLEDGE GAPS ASSOCIATED WITH ASSESSMENT: Distribution within Minnesota Economic impact (to yield/marketability, from quarantine/control) Extent of future invasion Impact to threatened/endangered species 1 | L. polyphyllus ARRIVAL Proximity to Minnesota: VERY HIGH RANKING Very High Pest is known to occur in Minnesota Pest occurs in Wisconsin, Iowa, South Dakota, North Dakota, Manitoba or High Ontario Medium Pest occurs in North America Low Pest is not known to occur in North America Lupinus polyphyllus is currently reported outside of cultivation in at least seven (7) counties in Minnesota (Cook, Lake, St. Louis, Itasca, Carlton, Pine, and Becker) (EDDMapS 2019; UMN-Bell 2019), with the earliest herbarium record occurring in 1970 in Itasca Co. (UMN-Bell 2019). Other sources suggest additional counties have populations (Benton and Aitkin) (Chayka and Dziuk 2017; Kartesz 2015). It has otherwise been documented in regions of Wisconsin, Michigan, Alaska, and Maine (EDDMapS 2019), and likely in additional northeastern states (USDA-NRCS 2019; Kartesz 2015). It is also introduced in Ontario and other eastern Canadian provinces (USDA-NRCS 2019; Canadensys 2019). Existence of Pathways: HIGH RANKING High Pathways for arrival of the pest in Minnesota are known to occur Pathways for the arrival of the pest in Minnesota are conceivable, but not Medium known to occur Low Pathways for arrival of the pest in Minnesota are difficult to conceive Lupinus polyphyllus is documented within Minnesota (see Proximity to Minnesota), and no regulation currently exists to limit its arrival or spread to the state. It is a species historically and presently part of the horticultural trade used as a garden ornamental, for erosion control, soil improvement, as an intercropping species, as forage for wildlife and livestock, and in fire-protection belts (CABI 2018; Beuthin 2012; Fremstad 2010). Seeds and plants of L. polyphyllus or its hybrids (Russel lupine) or cultivars (‘Gallery Pink’) are widely available for purchase online (e.g., amazon.com, etsy.com, buyrareseeds.com, bulkwildflowers.com, brecks.com), including through at least one local retailer (plants.gertens.com). Entry into Minnesota could also occur through the natural dispersal of viable seeds or vegetative fragments (see Innate Dispersal Capacity); Lupinus polyphyllus is found in nearby regions in WI, MI, and Ontario (see Proximity to Minnesota). 2 | L. polyphyllus Innate Dispersal Capacity: LOW RANKING Maximum recorded dispersal >500 km per year (or moves in low level Very High jets/ upper atmosphere) High Maximum recorded dispersal 500-250 km per year Moderate Maximum recorded dispersal 100-250 km per year Maximum recorded dispersal 1-100 km per year (wind dispersal; flowing Moderately Low water) Maximum recorded dispersal <1 km per year (movement through soil; Low splash dispersal) Lupinus spp. seeds are comparatively heavy and do not have specialized structures for wind dispersal or adhesion to animals (OGTR 2013). They are dispersed mainly through ballistic dispersal, shooting away from parent plants by a few meters (OGTR 2013; Ramula 2014). There is suggestion that L. polyphyllus seeds are dispersed via zoochory by insects and/or rodents (Rask-Jensen 2018), though evidence is lacking. Lupinus polyphyllus can also spread locally through creeping rhizomes (Fremstad 2010; Ramula 2014). Besides human-mediated spread and potential zoochory, long distance dispersal of L. polyphyllus seeds is said to occur via waterways (OGTR 2013; CABI 2018), but documented evidence of this could not be found. ESTABLISHMENT AND PERSISTENCE Suitability of Minnesota Climate: HIGH RANKING High >40% of Minnesota is predicted to be suitable Medium >20 to 40% of Minnesota is predicted to be suitable Low >0 to 20% of Minnesota is predicted to be suitable Negligible No part of Minnesota is suitable Documentation of the climatic tolerance of L. polyphyllus is limited. It prefers “cool, subalpine climates” (Beuthin 2012) and perennial Lupinus x hybrida, the most popular of which are L. polyphyllus-based “Russel Hybrids”, are listed as USDA Zone 4-8 plants (MBG 2019). Records in Glacier Co., MT confirm its tolerance to at least Zone 4, though most of its native range in the western U.S. occurs in warmer Zones (USDA- NRCS 2019; USDA-ARS 2012). Specific sites of L. polyphyllus in Becker, Itasca, and Pine Co., MN confirm occurrence of the species in USDA Zone 3b (EDDMapS 2019; USDA-ARS 2012). As a Zone 3b species, >40% of Minnesota is climatically suitable. 3 | L. polyphyllus Presence of Hosts: HIGH RANKING High >10% of Minnesota with suitable hosts (or habitat for weeds) Medium >1 to 10% of Minnesota with suitable hosts (or habitat for weeds) Low >0 to 1% of Minnesota with suitable hosts (or habitat for weeds) Negligible 0% of Minnesota with suitable hosts (or habitat for weeds) In its native western U.S. range, L. polyphyllus occurs primarily in meadows, roadsides, banks, and prefers seasonally wet habitats (CABI 2018; Fremstad 2010; Beuthin 2012). Habitats of L. polyphyllus in its invaded range are often associated with disturbance, but can vary, including open ruderal areas, such as road verges, wastelands and meadows, forest understories, river banks, and wetlands (CABI 2018; Ramula 2014; Fremstad 2010). The species tolerates acidic, nutrient-poor soils and prefers moderately dry, sandy soils (CABI 2018; Fremstad 2010). Descriptions of sites were it has been document in Minnesota include dry and moist roadsides, disturbed fields, open grassy or rocky areas, and mixed wooded areas (UMN-Bell 2019; EDDMapS 2019). Considering only non-interstate roadways, there are ~123,394 miles in Minnesota (Williams 2005). Assuming ‘roadside’ habitat could occur within 100ft of the road edge on either side, that equates to 4,674 square miles, or ~5.7% of total state land. In 2016, 1,058,955 acres were classified as CRP land (MN-DNR 2019), which is about 2% of total state land. There are ~4,420 miles of railroads in Minnesota (MN-DOT 2018; MRRA 2020). Assuming ‘railway’ habitat could occur within 100ft of the rail edge on either side, that is about 167 square miles, or ~0.2% of total state land. There are 4,455,584 acres of non-native prairie grasslands in the Prairie Region of Minnesota (MN-DNR 2018), which is about 8.7% of state land. Of the estimated 7,719,200 acres of riparian land in Minnesota, 34.5% is forested (2,663,124 acres) (MN-DNR 2001). This accounts for about 5.2% of Minnesota’s terrestrial land. Only portions of these selected habitats would need to be suitable to account for >10% of Minnesota. Hybridization/Host Shift: HIGH RANKING High Species reported to hybridize or has undergone a documented host shift Medium Species in the same genus have been reported to hybridize/shift hosts Low Hybridization/Host shifts have not been reported for this genus or species Species within Lupinus are known to hybridize, both naturally and through artificial breeding (Stace 2010; Clements et al. 2008; Kurlovich, Stoddard, and Earnshaw 2008). 4 | L. polyphyllus Popular ornamental cultivars known as Russel Lupine or Russel Hybrids (= L. x regalis or L. polyphyllus ssp. polyphyllus) are based on hybridization between L. arboreus and L. polyphyllus (Fremstad 2010; Stace 2010; Beuthin 2012). This hybrid has been found spontaneously occurring in Britain where both parents occur, potentially backcrossing to L. arboreus (Stace 2010; BRC 2019). In Europe, spontaneous hybrids of L. polyphyllus with naturalized L. regalis and L. nootkatensis have been reported (KEW 2019; Fremstad 2010). Hybrids between L. polyphyllus and L. nootkatensis (=L. x pseudopolyphyllus) have also been reported in Alaska (CABI 2018). Some sources state that L. polyphyllus will hybridize with L. perennis, a native eastern U.S. species and single host plant to the endangered Karner Blue butterfly (Byleckie 2000; WI-DNR 2019). The resulting hybrid is purportedly unsuitable for larval development. However, other sources are less certain of this phenomenon (Fremstad 2010) and empirical evidence of hybridization or unpalatability of such hybrid to the endangered butterfly could not be found. SPREAD Existence of Pathways: HIGH RANKING High Pathways for arrival of the pest in Minnesota are known to occur Pathways for the arrival of the pest in Minnesota are conceivable, but not Medium known to occur Low Pathways for arrival of the pest in Minnesota are difficult to conceive Intentional and unintentional human-mediated spread is considered to be a major long-distance pathway for L. polyphyllus movement into new areas (Brobäck 2015; CABI 2018; OGTR 2013), and naturalized populations of the species have been noted within Minnesota for more than 5 years (see Proximity to Minnesota). It is a species historically and presently part of the horticultural trade as a garden ornamental, erosion control, soil improvement, as an intercropping species, as forage for wildlife and livestock, and in fire-protection belts (CABI 2018; Beuthin 2012; Fremstad 2010; Kurlovich, Stoddard, and Earnshaw 2008).
Recommended publications
  • Plants for Pollinators Calendar & Practices to Support Pollinators
    PLANTS FOR POLLINATORS CALENDAR & PRACTICES TO SUPPORT POLLINATORS Jacqueline Cramer, Design Collaborators and Kimberly Leeper, Mariposa Naturescapes GREEN GARDENING WORKSHOP – Oct. 22, 2014 Increase Foraging Habitat – Succession of Flowers through Entire Growing Season – Plant in Clumps/Natural Drifts of Same Species and in Plant Corridors (Hedgerows) Choose nectar and pollen‐rich plants like native wildflowers and old‐fashioned (non‐native) varieties of perennial flowers that are NOT invasive. A corridor of pollinator gardens in neighborhoods, cities, and rural areas around the country could provide enough habitat to restore healthy communities of beneficial insects and pollinators. PLANTS FOR POLLINATORS CALENDAR Be aware that this plant list is a sampling of possible native and non‐native plants available for pollinators. Criteria for selection on this list: well‐behaved; less “messy” than some; easy to find; drought‐tolerant (“right plant, right plant”); multi‐functional (two functions+); and focus on being good for variety of bees. *Bloom times are approximate and will depend upon the weather that season as well as microclimates/site conditions; Observe bloom times of different species you’ve planted and tweak it so you have multiple species blooming over the growing season (Feb. – Oct.). You can find non‐native “versions” of some native plants listed. WINTER – January – February* ‐‐Cornelian Cherry – Cornus mas ‐‐Hardy Cyclamen (or Persian Violet) ‐‐ Cyclamen coum ‐‐BULBS – Narcissus (early varieties), Daffodil, and Crocus ‐‐Hellebore
    [Show full text]
  • Cusick's Lupine (Lupinus Lepidus Var
    Cusick's lupine (Lupinus lepidus var. cusickii) ENDANGERED Flowers (left), habit (center), and habitat (right) of Cusick’s lupine. Photos by Robert Meinke (left and right) and Rebecca Currin (center). If downloading images from this website, please credit the photographer. Family Fabaceae Taxonomic notes Synonyms: Lupinus cusickii, L. aridus var. cusickii, L. lepidus ssp. cusickii The genus Lupinus poses many taxonomic challenges due to the extremely variable nature of the species and intergradations between recognized taxa, a situation that in many instances is likely the result of or complicated by free interbreeding that has obscured species boundaries. Lupine populations designated by the epithet cusickii have been treated in a myriad of ways: as a species, as a variety of L. aridus, and as a subspecies, variety, or synonym of L. lepidus. Plant description Cusick’s lupine is an erect, caespitose perennial 2-11 cm tall. Stems are sparingly branched at the base, with upper stem internodes 1-3 cm long. Upper stem nodes often bear a lateral branch terminating in an inflorescence. Leaves are mainly basal, the petioles 2-6 cm long, the 5-9 oblanceolate leaflets abundantly hairy on both surfaces, 0.7-1.9 cm long by 0.3-0.7 cm wide. Peduncles are 1-6 cm long, subequal to or shorter than the racemes. Racemes are 1-6 cm long, and held at about the height of the vegetative crown when mature. Flowers are crowded and whorled, borne on slender pedicels 0.4-0.5 cm long at anthesis. The calyx is hairy and not saccate or spurred.
    [Show full text]
  • Agro-Morphological Evaluation of Lupinus Mutabilis in Two Locations in Greece and Association with Insect Pollinators
    agriculture Article Agro-Morphological Evaluation of Lupinus mutabilis in Two Locations in Greece and Association with Insect Pollinators Myrto S. Barda , Tilemachos Chatzigeorgiou , George K. Papadopoulos and Penelope J. Bebeli * Laboratory of Plant Breeding and Biometry, Department of Crop Science, Agricultural University of Athens, 11855 Athens, Greece; [email protected] (M.S.B.); [email protected] (T.C.); [email protected] (G.K.P.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +30-210-529-4626 Abstract: Lupinus mutabilis Sweet is an Andean protein crop with agro-economic potential. However, it is characterized by low yields and phenotypic plasticity related to environmental conditions when cultivated in different locations in Europe. Current research objective was to evaluate L. mutabilis agro-morphological performance in two locations in Greece and to record its pollinators, since these can contribute to optimization of crop performance. For this purpose, eight Andean lupin accessions, one white and one blue lupin commercial varieties were evaluated for 71 agro-morphological traits in a Randomized Complete Block design with three replications. Combined Analysis over Location presented a significant accession-location interaction for traits of economic interest such as seed crude protein and 100 seed weight. Seed crude protein was higher in L. mutabilis accessions (up to 43.8 g 100 g−1 seed) than white and blue lupins. Andean lupin yielded up to 327 kg ha−1 (LIB214) in Kalamata, while its yield was lower than the white lupin in Athens. Using principal component analysis, three groups of accessions were formed, one by each lupin species and three within Andean lupin accessions.
    [Show full text]
  • Narrow-Leaf Lupin, EM 8834-E
    Dryland Cropping Systems EM 8834-E • June 2003 $1.00 Narrow-leaf Lupin K. Kettel, B. Tuck, W.A. Payne, C. Chen, S. Machado, and R. Karow History As a crop species, lupin was important to many ancient civilizations and has been cultivated, mostly as a green manure, for at least 3,000 years. Its native range extends through the western parts of North and South America as well as around the Mediterranean, extending into eastern Africa. Of the more than 300 Lupinus species, only five are cultivated (L. albus, L. angustifolius, L. luteus, L. mutabilis, and L. cosentenii). In the 1920s, German plant breeders produced the first low-alkaloid lupin varieties. Like other legumes, lupin fixes atmospheric nitrogen and produces a high-protein seed that is used as a feed and food source throughout the world. In the past, lupin production in Oregon was limited to white lupin varieties (L. albus). White lupin has been grown in the Columbia Gorge region since the late 1980s. Research at the Oregon State University (OSU) Moro Research Station showed excellent yield potential. Although white lupin is well adapted to most growing conditions in Oregon, it has suffered from undetermined disease problems. In 1998, OSU researchers resumed lupin research in response to grower interest. After conferring with Australian researchers, Dr. William Payne became convinced that imported narrow-leaf lupin varieties (L. angustifolius) from Australia would provide resistance to the types of diseases that had troubled white lupin in the past. Because current Oregon lupin research has focused on narrow-leaf varieties, this publication will discuss the agronomic practices of growing the narrow-leaf varieties developed in Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • Bumble Bee Pollen Foraging on Lupine (Lupinus: Fabaceae)
    BUMBLE BEE POLLEN FORAGING ON LUPINE (LUPINUS: FABACEAE): WITHIN-WHORL DECISIONS by Birgit Semsrott A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of Humboldt State University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts In Biology May 2000 BUMBLE BEE POLLEN FORAGING ON LUPINE (LUPINUS: FABACEAE): WITHIN-WHORL DECISIONS by Birgit Semsrott We certify that we have read this study and that it conforms to acceptable standards of scholarly presentation and is fully acceptable, in scope and quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master of Arts. Approved by the Master's Thesis Committee: Michael R. Mesler, Major Professor Michael &mann, Committee Member P. Dawn Goley, Committee Member Casey Lu, Committee Member Milton J. Boyd, Graduate Coordinator Ronald Fritzsche, Dean for Research and Graduate Studies ABSTRACT Bumble bee pollen foraging on lupine (Lupinus: Fabaceae): within-whorl decisions Birgit Semsrott Bumble bees (Bombus: Apidae) can maximize foraging efficiency in a resource-patchy environment by visiting mainly rewarding flowers and avoiding those that are either empty or less rewarding. This study investigated how bumble bees avoid unrewarding flowers of lupine (Lupinus: Fabaceae), a plant in which the pollen is hidden from view. I recorded whether bees left a whorl upon encountering various situations. Bumble bees clearly discriminated against flowers that showed unambiguous visual signs of being unrewarding. In the absence of any visual cues, bees made use of a presumably predictable spatial distribution of pollen within whorls. They were able to assess the amount of pollen collected per flower, and they departed upon encountering one or more unrewarding flowers.
    [Show full text]
  • Oberholzeria (Fabaceae Subfam. Faboideae), a New Monotypic Legume Genus from Namibia
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Oberholzeria (Fabaceae subfam. Faboideae), a New Monotypic Legume Genus from Namibia Wessel Swanepoel1,2*, M. Marianne le Roux3¤, Martin F. Wojciechowski4, Abraham E. van Wyk2 1 Independent Researcher, Windhoek, Namibia, 2 H. G. W. J. Schweickerdt Herbarium, Department of Plant Science, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa, 3 Department of Botany and Plant Biotechnology, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa, 4 School of Life Sciences, Arizona a11111 State University, Tempe, Arizona, United States of America ¤ Current address: South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria, South Africa * [email protected] Abstract OPEN ACCESS Oberholzeria etendekaensis, a succulent biennial or short-lived perennial shrublet is de- Citation: Swanepoel W, le Roux MM, Wojciechowski scribed as a new species, and a new monotypic genus. Discovered in 2012, it is a rare spe- MF, van Wyk AE (2015) Oberholzeria (Fabaceae subfam. Faboideae), a New Monotypic Legume cies known only from a single locality in the Kaokoveld Centre of Plant Endemism, north- Genus from Namibia. PLoS ONE 10(3): e0122080. western Namibia. Phylogenetic analyses of molecular sequence data from the plastid matK doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0122080 gene resolves Oberholzeria as the sister group to the Genisteae clade while data from the Academic Editor: Maharaj K Pandit, University of nuclear rDNA ITS region showed that it is sister to a clade comprising both the Crotalarieae Delhi, INDIA and Genisteae clades. Morphological characters diagnostic of the new genus include: 1) Received: October 3, 2014 succulent stems with woody remains; 2) pinnately trifoliolate, fleshy leaves; 3) monadel- Accepted: February 2, 2015 phous stamens in a sheath that is fused above; 4) dimorphic anthers with five long, basifixed anthers alternating with five short, dorsifixed anthers, and 5) pendent, membranous, one- Published: March 27, 2015 seeded, laterally flattened, slightly inflated but indehiscent fruits.
    [Show full text]
  • Propagation of Native Plants for Restoration Projects in the SW U.S
    Propagation of Native Plants for Restoration Projects in the Southwestern U.S. - Preliminary Investigations 1 David R. Dreesen2 and John T. Harrington3 Abstract-Seed treatments to enhance germination capacity of a variety of native tree. shrub. forb. and grass species are reported. Scarification methods including hot water immersion (HW). mechanical scarification (MS). tumble scarification (TS), proximal end cuts (PEC), and sodium hypochlorite (SH) have been tested: Psorothamnus fremontii (HW. TS). Ceanothus integerrimus (HW). Ceanothus sanguineus (HW). Rhus g/abra (HW). Pte/ea trifoliata (PEG of seed separated by size and color). Rubus strigosus (SH), Oryzopsis hymenoides (TS), Co/eogyne ramosissima (TS). and a variety of native woody and herbaceous perennial legume species (HW. TS. MS). Gibberellic acid treatments were examined to overcome endo-dormancy of A/nus tenuifo/ia. A. ob/ongifolia, Rubus strigosus, and Oryzopsis hymenoides. Vegetative propagation methods investigated include mound layering of Platanus wrightii, root propagation of Populus tremu/oides. and pole plantings of riparian understory species (Amorpha fruticosa, Baccharis glutinosa, Forestiera neomexicana. and Chilopsis Iinearis). INTRODUCTION pounded by the scarcity of propagu\es (seed or vegeta­ tive material) of some species or ecotypes. Restoration ofdisturbed lands in the southwestern U.S. has become a primary mission of many federal and Seed propagation ofnative species often requires state land management agencies and a regulatory growers to rely on information from closely related requirement for extractive industries. Frequently, horticultural species for seed treatment requirements. containerized or bare-root plant materials are used for While this information is useful, many species are reclamation activities following severe disturbance or produced by the horticulture industry because oftheir for introduction ofwoody plant species formerly present ease ofpropagation as well as other horticulturally on poorly managed lands.
    [Show full text]
  • Andean Lupin (Lupinus Mutabilis)
    Andean lupin (Lupinus mutabilis) Cropping and its opportunities for Europe Udo Prins, Rob van Haren Professor João Neves Martins PhD, Universidade de Lisboa, ISA - Instituto Superior de Agronomia Department with promising Andean lupin accession from LIBBIO project. 1 Lupin as sustainable crop The Andean lupin, Lupinus mutabilis, is one of the four lupin species which is suitable for human consumption. The Andean lupin originates from South- America where it has been part of the menu for thousands of years. The other three lupin species originate from the Middle East, Southern Europe and North Africa. These lupins are the White, Yellow and the Blue (narrow-leaved) lupins. Andean lupin is like the soy bean high in oil and protein content and therefore has the potential to be a good alternative to many soy bean applications. The objective of the LIBBIO project is to introduce Andean lupin to Europe, as a new crop for food and non-food applications. Andean lupin has the advantages that it grows on marginal soils, makes its own nitrogen fertilizer from air by natural symbiosis with bacteria and, when harvested, has nutritious beans, rich in proteins, vegetable oil and prebiotics. Andean lupin oil is rich in unsaturated fatty acids and high in anti- oxidants and Vitamin-E (tocopherol), thereby contributing to a healthy menu. Lupin pod with lupin beans Good for the soil A farmer with care for his soil might consider cultivation of lupin crops. Lupins offer many benefits in a sustainable cropping rotation scheme. Symbiotic bacteria living in root nodules on the roots of lupins fixate nitrogen from the air into N-fertilizer for the crop.
    [Show full text]
  • Fort Ord Natural Reserve Plant List
    UCSC Fort Ord Natural Reserve Plants Below is the most recently updated plant list for UCSC Fort Ord Natural Reserve. * non-native taxon ? presence in question Listed Species Information: CNPS Listed - as designated by the California Rare Plant Ranks (formerly known as CNPS Lists). More information at http://www.cnps.org/cnps/rareplants/ranking.php Cal IPC Listed - an inventory that categorizes exotic and invasive plants as High, Moderate, or Limited, reflecting the level of each species' negative ecological impact in California. More information at http://www.cal-ipc.org More information about Federal and State threatened and endangered species listings can be found at https://www.fws.gov/endangered/ (US) and http://www.dfg.ca.gov/wildlife/nongame/ t_e_spp/ (CA). FAMILY NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME LISTED Ferns AZOLLACEAE - Mosquito Fern American water fern, mosquito fern, Family Azolla filiculoides ? Mosquito fern, Pacific mosquitofern DENNSTAEDTIACEAE - Bracken Hairy brackenfern, Western bracken Family Pteridium aquilinum var. pubescens fern DRYOPTERIDACEAE - Shield or California wood fern, Coastal wood wood fern family Dryopteris arguta fern, Shield fern Common horsetail rush, Common horsetail, field horsetail, Field EQUISETACEAE - Horsetail Family Equisetum arvense horsetail Equisetum telmateia ssp. braunii Giant horse tail, Giant horsetail Pentagramma triangularis ssp. PTERIDACEAE - Brake Family triangularis Gold back fern Gymnosperms CUPRESSACEAE - Cypress Family Hesperocyparis macrocarpa Monterey cypress CNPS - 1B.2, Cal IPC
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Article
    Unlike the more common – and non- The Outside Story native – garden lupine (Lupinus polyphyllus), the wild lupine requires the sandy soil and unshaded openness found in pine barrens. This type of habitat – known for its dry and acidic soil, shrubby understory, and canopy of scrub oak and pitch pine – was once found along New Hampshire’s Merrimack River Valley, from the southern reaches of the state to the north, past Concord. Karner blues thrived in these pine barrens and in similar habitats from Maine to Minnesota. Unfortunately for the Karner blue, land developers also favored these sandy areas. The majority, and some 90 percent of the pine barrens in New Hampshire, has been plowed under or paved over. With the pine barrens went the Karner blues, which were considered extirpated Karner Blues from the state in 2000. It’s a story that’s been repeated throughout the Karner’s Make a Comeback range, which is now restricted to pockets of habitat around Concord, in the Albany By: Meghan McCarthy Pine Bush Reserve in New York State, and McPhaul in a few areas in the Midwest. It was novelist Vladimir Nabokov, a The Karner blue, New Hampshire’s state butterfly enthusiast, who first identified butterfly, is a wisp of a thing, a tiny the subspecies Lycaeides melissa fluttering of silvery-blue wings. Unless you samuelis. The nickname “Karner blue” happen to be wandering through a pine comes from the hamlet in New York State barren or black-oak savannah, however, where Nabokov discovered the butterfly, you’re unlikely to spot one.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study on the Effectiveness of Transplanting Vs
    A STUDY ON THE EFFECTIVENESS OF TRANSPLANTING VS. SEEDING OF LUPINUS PERENNIS IN AN OAK SAVANNA REGENERATION SITE Mark K. St. Mary A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE August 2007 Committee: Helen J.Michaels, Advisor Jeffery G. Miner Daniel M. Pavuk ii ABSTRACT Helen J. Michaels, Advisor Lupinus perennis (Fabaceae) is an indicator species for savanna and barrens habitat throughout the Great Lakes region and northeastern United States. It is also the sole larval food source for the federally endangered Karner blue butterfly (Lycaeides melissa samuelis) and an important food source for other threatened butterfly species. Although butterfly recovery programs include restoration of existing lupine populations and establishment of new ones, the determination of the optimum conditions and method of lupine repopulation has received little attention. This study compared the survival, growth and reproduction of L. perennis for two growing seasons after planting. Seed and greenhouse grown transplants from four population sources were planted across naturally occurring gradients of light, soil moisture, pH, phosphorous, and soil surface materials along field transects in a savanna restoration. Estimates of labor required in the production, planting and aftercare of both greenhouse plants and seeds were also compared. Both population source and substrate type significantly influenced seedling emergence, while survival decreased with increased light levels, herbivory, and disturbance. As expected, transplants had significantly greater survival than seedlings, but were also affected by initial size, population source, herbivory and disturbance. Seedling size was influenced by population source, light, and soil pH, while transplant size varied only with population and light.
    [Show full text]
  • Perennial Grain Legume Domestication Phase I: Criteria for Candidate Species Selection
    sustainability Review Perennial Grain Legume Domestication Phase I: Criteria for Candidate Species Selection Brandon Schlautman 1,2,* ID , Spencer Barriball 1, Claudia Ciotir 2,3, Sterling Herron 2,3 and Allison J. Miller 2,3 1 The Land Institute, 2440 E. Water Well Rd., Salina, KS 67401, USA; [email protected] 2 Saint Louis University Department of Biology, 1008 Spring Ave., St. Louis, MO 63110, USA; [email protected] (C.C.); [email protected] (S.H.); [email protected] (A.J.M.) 3 Missouri Botanical Garden, 4500 Shaw Blvd. St. Louis, MO 63110, USA * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-785-823-5376 Received: 12 February 2018; Accepted: 4 March 2018; Published: 7 March 2018 Abstract: Annual cereal and legume grain production is dependent on inorganic nitrogen (N) and other fertilizers inputs to resupply nutrients lost as harvested grain, via soil erosion/runoff, and by other natural or anthropogenic causes. Temperate-adapted perennial grain legumes, though currently non-existent, might be uniquely situated as crop plants able to provide relief from reliance on synthetic nitrogen while supplying stable yields of highly nutritious seeds in low-input agricultural ecosystems. As such, perennial grain legume breeding and domestication programs are being initiated at The Land Institute (Salina, KS, USA) and elsewhere. This review aims to facilitate the development of those programs by providing criteria for evaluating potential species and in choosing candidates most likely to be domesticated and adopted as herbaceous, perennial, temperate-adapted grain legumes. We outline specific morphological and ecophysiological traits that may influence each candidate’s agronomic potential, the quality of its seeds and the ecosystem services it can provide.
    [Show full text]