Major Land Resource Areas (MLRA) of Utah
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Wasatch Fault
The WasatchWasatchThe FaultFault UtahUtah Geological Geological Survey Survey PublicPublic Information Information Series Series 40 40 11 9 9 9 9 6 6 The WasatchWasatchThe FaultFault CONTENTS The ups and downs of the Wasatch fault . .1 What is the Wasatch fault? . .1 Where is the Wasatch fault? Globally ............................................................................................2 Regionally . .2 Locally .............................................................................................4 Surface expressions (how to recognize the fault) . .5 Land use - your fault? . .8 At a glance - geological relationships . .10 Earthquakes ..........................................................................................12 When/how often? . .14 Howbig? .........................................................................................15 Earthquake hazards . .15 Future probability of the "big one" . .16 Where to get additional information . .17 Selected bibliography . .17 Acknowledgments Text by Sandra N. Eldredge. Design and graphics by Vicky Clarke. Special thanks to: Walter Arabasz of the University of Utah Seismograph Stations for per- mission to reproduce photographs on p. 6, 9, II; Utah State University for permission to use the satellite image mosaic on the cover; Rebecca Hylland for her assistance; Gary Christenson, Kimm Harty, William Lund, Edith (Deedee) O'Brien, and Christine Wilkerson for their reviews; and James Parker for drafting. Research supported by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), Department -
Page 5 of the 2020 Antelope, Deer and Elk Regulations
WYOMING GAME AND FISH COMMISSION Antelope, 2020 Deer and Elk Hunting Regulations Don't forget your conservation stamp Hunters and anglers must purchase a conservation stamp to hunt and fish in Wyoming. (See page 6) See page 18 for more information. wgfd.wyo.gov Wyoming Hunting Regulations | 1 CONTENTS Access on Lands Enrolled in the Department’s Walk-in Areas Elk or Hunter Management Areas .................................................... 4 Hunt area map ............................................................................. 46 Access Yes Program .......................................................................... 4 Hunting seasons .......................................................................... 47 Age Restrictions ................................................................................. 4 Characteristics ............................................................................. 47 Antelope Special archery seasons.............................................................. 57 Hunt area map ..............................................................................12 Disabled hunter season extension.............................................. 57 Hunting seasons ...........................................................................13 Elk Special Management Permit ................................................. 57 Characteristics ..............................................................................13 Youth elk hunters........................................................................ -
Geology of the Northern Part of Wellsville Mountain, Northern Wasatch Range, Utah
Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU All Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate Studies 5-1958 Geology of the Northern Part of Wellsville Mountain, Northern Wasatch Range, Utah Stanley S. Beus Utah State University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd Part of the Geology Commons Recommended Citation Beus, Stanley S., "Geology of the Northern Part of Wellsville Mountain, Northern Wasatch Range, Utah" (1958). All Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 4430. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/4430 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. GEOWGY OF THE NORTHERN PART OF WELLSVILLE MJUNTAIN, NORTHERN WASATCH RANGE, UTAH - by Stanley S. Beus A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE in Geology UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY Logan, Utah 1958 ACKNO I\ LEDGMENT I am grateful to Dr . J. Stewa rt Ni lli ama, Dr. Clyde T. Hardy , and Professor Dona ld R. Olsen for the as sista nce in field work and for their suggestions concerning the wr iting of this manuscript. Stanley S . Be us II TABLE OF CONTENTS Pa ge Introduction 1 Purpose a nd s cope 1 Location a nd extent of area 1 Physiography 2 Field work 11 5 Previous i nvestigati ons 6 Str a tigr aphy 8 Pr e - Ca mbrian r ocks 8 Cambri an system 9 Bri gham quart zi te 10 La ngs ton forma tion 11 Ute f orma tion 13 Bla cksmith for mation 14 Bloomington f or ma t ion 16 Nounan f orma tion 17 St. -
SW CASC Science Agenda 2013-2018
Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Southwest Climate Science Center 2013 Strategic Science Agenda Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 3 Relation of the Southwest Climate Science Center to the Stakeholder Advisory Committee and Partners 5 Climatic Context of the Southwest ............................................................................................................... 6 Vision ........................................................................................................................................................... 13 Guiding Principles ....................................................................................................................................... 13 Goals of the Southwest Climate Science Center ......................................................................................... 14 Leadership goal ............................................................................................................................ 14 Research goal ............................................................................................................................ 14 Synthesis goal ............................................................................................................................ 15 Critical Information Needs ......................................................................................................................... -
C E N Oz Oi C C Oll a Ps E of T H E E Ast Er N Ui Nt a M O U Nt Ai Ns a N D Dr Ai
Research Paper T H E M E D I S S U E: C Revolution 2: Origin and Evolution of the Colorado River Syste m II GEOSPHERE Cenozoic collapse of the eastern Uinta Mountains and drainage evolution of the Uinta Mountains region G E O S P H E R E; v. 1 4, n o. 1 Andres Aslan 1 , Marisa Boraas-Connors 2 , D o u gl a s A. S pri n k el 3 , Tho mas P. Becker 4 , Ranie Lynds 5 , K arl E. K arl str o m 6 , a n d M att H eizl er 7 1 Depart ment of Physical and Environ mental Sciences, Colorado Mesa University, 1100 North Avenue, Grand Junction, Colorado 81501, U S A doi:10.1130/ G E S01523.1 2 Depart ment of Geosciences, Colorado State University, Natural Resources Building, Roo m 322, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523, U S A 3 Utah Geological Survey, 1594 W North Te mple, Salt Lake City, Utah 84114-6100, U S A 1 5 fi g ur e s; 1 t a bl e; 4 s u p pl e m e nt al fil e s 4 Exxon Mobil Exploration Co mpany, 22777 Spring woods Village Park way, Spring, Texas 77389, U S A 5 Wyo ming State Geological Survey, P. O. Box 1347, Lara mie, Wyo ming 82073, U S A 6 Depart ment of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of Ne w Mexico, Redondo Drive NE, Albuquerque, Ne w Mexico 87131, U S A C O R RESP O N DE N CE: aaslan @colorado mesa .edu 7 Ne w Mexico Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources, Ne w Mexico Tech, 801 Leroy Place, Socorro, Ne w Mexico 87801, U S A CI T A TI O N: Aslan, A., Boraas- Connors, M., Sprinkel, D. -
Water Resources Development by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers in Utah
DEVELOPMENT W&M U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS TC SOU TH PACIFIC DIVI SI O N 423 • A15 1977 Utah 1977 M ■ - z//>A ;^7 /WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT ec by THE U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS in UTAH JANUARY 1977 ADDRESS INQUIRIES TO DIVISION ENGINEER U.S. Army Engineer Division South Pacific Corps of Engineers 630 Sansome Street San Fransisco, California 94111 DISTRICT ENGINEER DISTRICT ENGINEER U.S. Army Engineer District U.S. Army Engineer District Los Angeles Corps of Engineers Sacramento Federal Building Corps of Engineers 300 North Los Angeles Street Federal and Courts Building Los Angeles, California 90012 (P.O. Box 2711 650 Capitol Mall Los Angeles, California 90053) Sacramento, California 95814 TO OUR READERS: Throughout history, water has played a dominant role in shaping the destinies of nations and entire civilizations. The early settlement and development of our country occurred along our coasts and water courses. The management of our land and water resources was the catalyst which enabled us to progress from a basically rural and agrarian economy to the urban and industrialized nation we are today. Since the General Survey Act of 1824, the US Army Corps of Engineers has played a vital role in the development and management of our national water resources. At the direction of Presidents and with Congressional authorization and funding, the Corps of Engineers has planned and executed major national programs for navigation, flood control, water supply, hydroelectric power, recreation and water conservation which have been responsive to the changing needs and demands of the American people for 152 years. -
Mountain Goat Unit Management Plan | Wasatch and Central Mountains
MOUNTAIN GOAT UNIT MANAGEMENT PLAN Wasatch and Central Mountains Lone Peak / Box Elder Peak / Timpanogos / Provo Peak / Nebo August 2019 BOUNDARY DESCRIPTIONS Lone Peak – Salt Lake County: Boundary begins at the junction of I-15 and I-80 in Salt Lake City; east on I-80 to the Salt Lake-Summit county line; south along this county line to the Salt Lake-Wasatch county line; southwest along this county line to the Salt Lake-Utah county line; southwest along this county line to I-15; north on I-15 to I-80 in Salt Lake City. Box Elder Peak – Utah County: Boundary begins at I-15 and the Salt Lake-Utah county line; east along this county line to the Utah-Wasatch county line; south along this county line to “Pole Line Pass” on the Snake Creek-North Fork American Fork Canyon road; west on this road to SR-92; west on SR-92 to I-15; north on I-15 to the Salt Lake-Utah county line. Timpanogos – Utah County: Boundary begins at the junction of SR-92 and SR-146; southeast on SR-92 to US-189; southwest on US-189 to SR-52; west on SR-52 to US-89; north on US-89 to SR-146; north on SR-146 to SR-92. Provo Peak – Utah County: Boundary begins at the junction of I-15 and US-6 at Spanish Fork; north on I-15 to SR-52; east on SR-52 to US-189; northeast on US-189 to the South Fork Drainage of Provo Canyon; east along this drainage bottom to the Berryport trail; south along this trail to the Left Fork of Hobble Creek road; south on this road to the Right Fork of Hobble Creek road; east on this road to Cedar Canyon; south along this canyon bottom to Wanrhodes Canyon; south along this canyon bottom to Diamond Fork Creek; southwest along this creek to US-6; northeast on US-6 to I-15. -
Investigation of Salt Loss from the Bonneville Salt Flats, Northwestern Utah James L
U.S. Department of the Interior—U.S. Geological Survey Prepared in cooperation with Bureau of Land Management Investigation of Salt Loss from the Bonneville Salt Flats, Northwestern Utah James L. Mason and Kenneth L. Kipp, Jr. decreasing thickness region. The playa is flanked by the and extent of the salt Silver Island Mountains on the crust are caused by northwest, and the land surface brine withdrawal for gradually slopes upward for many mineral production. miles to the northeast, east, and south. Situated at the lowest altitude in the Mining of halite study area, the salt crust would be the (common table salt) final destination for surface runoff. from the Bonneville Salt Runoff from the flanks of the adjacent Flats began in the early Silver Island Mountains generally 1900s. Extraction of occurs during intense summer thun- potash from brine derstorms and flows in distinct beneath the Bonneville channels from the mountains toward Salt Flats began in 1917, the playa. These flows cross the when supplies of alluvial fans but mostly disappear into potassium salts from large surface fractures before reaching Germany were inter- the playa. Runoff during wetter-than- Drilling on the salt crust, Bonneville Salt Flats, Utah. rupted during World normal conditions can migrate several Measurements of Salt Crust War I. The area from which brine is withdrawn for potash production was Great Indicate a Decrease in Thickness expanded in 1963, when mineral leases Salt Great Salt and Extent on 25,000 acres of Federal land were Lake Lake UTAH issued. Desert The Bonneville Salt Flats study area Salt Lake City is located in the western part of the The Bonneville Salt Flats is a playa, Great Salt Lake Desert in northwestern which is a topographically low, flat Utah, about 110 miles west of Salt Lake area where evaporation is the only City (fig. -
Major Landforms and Their Economic Significance MODULE - 2 Changing Face of the Earth 7 Notes MAJOR LANDFORMS and THEIR ECONOMIC SIGNIFICANCE
Major Landforms and their Economic Significance MODULE - 2 Changing face of the Earth 7 Notes MAJOR LANDFORMS AND THEIR ECONOMIC SIGNIFICANCE You have learnt in the previous lesson that the landforms found on the earth’s surface are the result of interplay between internal and external forces. The soft rocks are easily worn down by these forces. While the relatively harder rocks are not so easily worn down. Therefore, rocks have a great influence on the landforms developed in an area. The internal forces are perpetually elevating the earth’s surface and the external forces about which you will study in the next lessons are constantly wearing down such elevations to make ,the surface level. This is how various landforms are formed by constant action of agents of gradation. These landforms are not only the physical features of the earth’s surface but also the basis of human civilization. The major landforms found on the earth’s surface are mountains, plateaus and plains. In this lesson, we will study the major landforms of the earth and their economic importance for us. OBJECTIVES After studying this lesson you will be able to : differentiate among the three major landforms found on the earth’s surface; explain the process of formation of various landforms with the help of illustrations; classify mountains on the basis of their mode of formation; discuss the usefulness of mountains to man; list different types of plateaus and describe their economic significance; GEOGRAPHY 121 MODULE - 2 Major Landforms and their Economic Significance Changing face of the Earth enumerate major types of plains and explain their influence on human life; locate major mountains, plateaus and plains on the outline map of the world. -
North American Deserts Chihuahuan - Great Basin Desert - Sonoran – Mojave
North American Deserts Chihuahuan - Great Basin Desert - Sonoran – Mojave http://www.desertusa.com/desert.html In most modern classifications, the deserts of the United States and northern Mexico are grouped into four distinct categories. These distinctions are made on the basis of floristic composition and distribution -- the species of plants growing in a particular desert region. Plant communities, in turn, are determined by the geologic history of a region, the soil and mineral conditions, the elevation and the patterns of precipitation. Three of these deserts -- the Chihuahuan, the Sonoran and the Mojave -- are called "hot deserts," because of their high temperatures during the long summer and because the evolutionary affinities of their plant life are largely with the subtropical plant communities to the south. The Great Basin Desert is called a "cold desert" because it is generally cooler and its dominant plant life is not subtropical in origin. Chihuahuan Desert: A small area of southeastern New Mexico and extreme western Texas, extending south into a vast area of Mexico. Great Basin Desert: The northern three-quarters of Nevada, western and southern Utah, to the southern third of Idaho and the southeastern corner of Oregon. According to some, it also includes small portions of western Colorado and southwestern Wyoming. Bordered on the south by the Mojave and Sonoran Deserts. Mojave Desert: A portion of southern Nevada, extreme southwestern Utah and of eastern California, north of the Sonoran Desert. Sonoran Desert: A relatively small region of extreme south-central California and most of the southern half of Arizona, east to almost the New Mexico line. -
Deer Season Subject to the Species Limitation of Their License in the Hunt Area(S) Where Their License Is Valid As Specified in Section 2 of This Chapter
CHAPTER 6 DEER HUNTING SEASONS Section 1. Authority. This regulation is promulgated by authority of Wyoming Statutes § 23-1-302, § 23-1-703 and § 23-2-104. Section 2. Regular Hunting Seasons. Hunt areas, season dates and limitations. Special Regular Season Hunt License Archery Dates Dates Area Type Opens Closes Opens Closes Quota Limitations 1 Gen Sep. 1 Sep. 30 Nov. 1 Nov. 20 Antlered deer off private land; any deer on private land 1 Gen Nov. 21 Nov. 30 Antlered white-tailed deer off private land; any white-tailed deer on private land 1, 2, 7 Sep. 1 Sep. 30 Nov. 1 Nov. 30 3500 Doe or fawn valid on 3 private land 2 Gen Sep. 1 Sep. 30 Nov. 1 Nov. 30 Antlered deer off private land; any deer on private land 3 Gen Sep. 1 Sep. 30 Nov. 1 Nov. 30 Antlered deer off private land; any deer on private land 4 Gen Sep. 1 Sep. 30 Nov. 1 Nov. 20 Antlered deer off private land; any deer on private land except the lands of the State of Wyoming's Ranch A property shall be closed 4 7 Sep. 1 Sep. 30 Nov. 1 Nov. 20 300 Doe or fawn valid on private land 5 Gen Sep. 1 Sep. 30 Nov. 1 Nov. 20 Antlered deer off private land; any deer on private land 5 6 Sep. 1 Sep. 30 Nov. 1 Nov. 20 200 Doe or fawn 6-1 6 Gen Sep. 1 Sep. 30 Nov. 1 Nov. 20 Antlered deer off private land; any deer on private land 7 Gen Sep. -
Workshop Proceedings
This file was created by scanning the printed publication. Errors identified by the software have been corrected; however, some errors may remain. ALPINE BIRD COMMUNITIES OF WESTERN NORTH AMERICA: IMPLICATIONS FOR MANAGEMENT AND RESEARcH!/ Clait E. Braun Wildlife Researcher Colorado Division of Wildlife, Research Center, 317 West Prospect Street, Fort Collins, Colorado 80526 ABSTRACT The avifauna of alpine regions of western North America is notably depauperate. Average community size is normally 3 to 4 although 5 species may consistently breed and nest above treeline. Only 1 species is a year around resident and totally dependent upon alpine habitats. Seasonal habitat preferences of the breeding avifauna are identified and the complexity of the processes and factors influencing alpine regions are reviewed. Management problems are discussed and research opportunities are identified. KEYWORDS: alpine ecosystem, habitat, avifauna, management, western North America. INTRODUCTION Alpine ecosystems occur in most of the high mountain cordilleras of western North America. Alpine, as used in this paper, refers to the area above treeline where habitats are characterized by short growing seasons, low temperatures and high winds. The term "tundra" is frequently used to describe these habitats but is more properly used in connection with arctic areas north of the limit of forest growth (Hoffmann and Taber 1967). While use of the terms "alpine tundra" and "arctic tundra" is common in designating above treeline (alpine) and northern lowland areas (arctic), the terminology of Billings (1979) is preferred. Likewise, lumping of alpine and arctic ecosystems into the "tundra biome" (see Kendeigh 1961) is not really feasible because of the extreme differences in radiation, moisture, topography, photo period, presence or absence of permafrost, etc.