DOCSLIB.ORG

General Assembly

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
General Assembly United Nations FOURTH COMMITTEE, 1699th GENERAL MEETING ASSEMBLY Mondey, 23 October 1967, at 3.25 p.m. TWENTY-SECOND SESSION Official Records NEW YORK CONTENTS could neither intervene nor oblige any Member State Page to submit the question for settlement under the pro­ cedures outlined in Chapter XI of the Charter. Requests for hearings (continued) Request concerning British Honduras (agenda 3. Lastly, his delegation considered that the applicant item 23) (continued) • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 109 did not have the qualifications required of a legitimate Request concerning Equatorial Guinea (agenda petitioner, and that to judge from his statement to the item 23) (continued) • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 109 Special Committee at its 548th meeting on 30 August Agenda item 64: 1967 (see A/6700/Rev.1, chap. XXIII, paras. 957-981), his request'seemed rather to be motivatedbypolitical Question of South West Africa (hearing of and personal considerations aimed at securing a posi­ petitioners) (continued) • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 110 tion of advantage in the forthcoming electoral contest in Belize. Furthermore, he categorically rejected the Chairman: Mr. George J. TOMEH (Syria). wording of Mr. Goldson's letter to the Chairman of the Fourth Committee, which referred to a "threat of recolonization by Guatemala". His country had never Requests for hearings {continued) been a colonial Power, and the Committee was well aware of its advocacy of decolonization. REQUEST CONCERNING BRITISH HONDURAS (AGENDA ITEM 23) (continued) (A/C.4/694) 4, Mr. SHAW (United Kingdom), referring to the Guatemalan representative's statement, said that 1. The CHAIRMAN drew the attention of Committee his Government wished it to be clearly understood members to the request for a hearing on the subject that it had not the slightest doubt as to its sovereignty of British Honduras, submitted by Mr. Philip S. W. over British Honduras. The two States concerned had Goldson, Leader of the Opposition (A/C.4/694). nevertheless submitted their dispute over the Terri­ 2. Mr. CADENA HERNANDEZ (Guatemala) said he tory to the mediation of a third Power. He hoped that wished to state his country's position with regard to the mediation would achieve a solution satisfactory to the request for a hearing on the subject of the Terri­ all concerned and that the members of the Committee tory of Belize (A/C.4/694). The prime essential for would bear his statement in mind in making their enabling the Committee to decide whether the hearing decision on the requested hearing. should be granted was that it should be acquainted 5. Mr. CADENA HERNANDEZ (Guatemala), replying with the current situation. The background to the to a question by the CHAIRMAN, said he had not made situation was as follows: first, his country hadalways a formal objection. As he had said already, he was co:1sidered Belize a part of its territory under inter­ not opposed to the hearing of the petitioners, but had national law and the Constitution of the Republic de­ wished to state his objections to a hearing in the scribed it as such-a fact which had been confirmed present circumstances. He therefore requested that at the first regular meeting of Central American the hearing should be postponed. Foreign Ministers, held at Antigua, Guatemala, in August 1955. Second, his country had been pressing 6. The CHAIRMAN explained that the Committee's its claims to the Territory against the United King­ immediate task was not to fix a date for the hearing dom for more than a century and had entered appro­ but to decide whether or not it should be granted. If priate reservations at every international conference, there was no objection, he would take it that the Com­ as witness the reservation made recently by the mittee decided to grant the hearing. Guatemalan Foreign Minister at the 1566th plenary It was so decided. meeting of the General Assembly, Third, the two States had jointly agreed to submit the dispute to mediation by the Government of the United States of REQUEST CONCERNING EQUATORIAL GUINEA America, in accordance with Article 2, paragraph 3, (AGENDA ITEM 23) (continued) (A/C.4/695) of the United Nations Charter, their common concern 7. The CHAIRMAN drew the attention of Committee being to ensure the economic, social, cultural and all members to the request for a hearing (A/C.4/695) other development of the people of Belize. Mediation submitted by Mr. Saturnine !bongo Iyanga, a member had begun towards the end of 1965 and was approaching of the Movimiento Nacional de Liberaci6n de la Guinea completion. In the circumstances, his delegation did E cuatorial (MONALIGE). If there was no objection, he not consider it proper for the Fourth Committee and would take it that the Committee decided to grant the the Special Committee to examine the situation in request. Belize. It was a matter coming within the internal jurisdiction of his country, and the United Nations It was so decided. 109 A/C.4/SR.1699 110 General Assembly - Twenty-second Session - Fourth Committee 8. Mr. ARIAS SALGADO (Spain) said that his dele­ ment had repeatedly made it clear that it would not gation reserved the right to make a statement at a abide by the United Nations resolutions on South West later stage on certain assertions made by Mr. lbongo Africa because it considered them illegal. That was a Iyanga in his letter, particularly the reference to the stand which South Africa had maintained ever since Constitutiornl Conference. the question of South West Africa had been taken up by the United Nations and the International Court of AGENDA ITEM 64 Justice. Question of South West Africa (hearing of petitioners) 12. The failure of the United Nations to use force (continued) (A/C.4/692 and Add.l-4) against South Africa was contributing to the deteriora­ tion of the situation. Indeed, not a few believed that At the invitation ofthe Chairman, Mr. JacobKuhangua the United Nations, by displaying such forbearance and Mr. Gottfried H. Geingob, representatives of the in dealing with South Africa, was encouraging that South West Africa People's Organization (SWAPO), country to persevere in its behaviour. South Africa's Mr. Nathaniel Mbaeva and Mr. Mburumba Kerina, lack of co-operation had lasted too long; it was now representatives of the South West Africa National time for the United Nations to change its attitude United Front (SWANUF), Mr. Festus U. Muundjua, and take action to settle the protracted dispute between representative of the South West Africa National South Africa and itself once and for all. Union (SWANU), and the Reverend Michael Scott, representative of the International League for the 13. Some western countries were opposed to the use Rights of Man, took places at the Committee table. of force against South Africa and even deplored refe­ rences to force. In that connexion, he recalled that, 9. Mr. MUUNDJUA (South West Africa National at the fifth special session of the General Assembly, Union) expressed his deep disappointment at the Canada, Italy and the United States had submitted a regrettable ineffectiveness of the United Nations in draft resolution ll calling for the continuation of the dealing with the South West African problem. He re­ dialogue with the South African Government. Such an minded the Committee of General Assembly resolu­ approach to the problem was frivolous. The United tions 2145 (XXI) and 2248 (S-V), the first of which had Nations had been trying for more than twenty years ended South Africa's Mandate over South West Africa to secure South Africa's co-operation by peaceful and placed that Territory under the direct responsi­ means; the result had always been negative. The bility of the United Nations. The truth of the matter "dialogue" had been no more than a tactical measure was that the United Nations had still not assumed any to retard South West Africa's freedom. SWANU there­ responsibility, direct or indirect, for South West fore rejected it, as it also rejected the Soviet Union's Africa, which was still controlled by the South African attempt to refer the issue to the Organization of racists. SWANU therefore considered that the United African Unity (OAU). He wondered how that organiza­ Nations had deceived the people of South West Africa tion could solve a problem which the United Nations and had not discharged its obligations under resolu­ was unable to solve. The attempt had been a further tion 2145 {XXI). That failure was due, not to external example of hypocrisy and capitulation. obstacles, but to the Organization's unwillingness to use force to coerce South Africa into accepting its 14. When the United States, Canada, Italy and the decisions. Soviet Union had voted in favour of resolution 2145 (XXI) they had taken a step forward, but in supporting 10. Resolution 2248 (S-V) had established a United delay and evasion they had not only impeded South Nations Council for South West Africa responsible West Africa's freedom but had moved backwards. As for administering the Territory until independence. for the United Kingdom Government, it was an ally of The Council was to have been based in South West South Africa and could not even contain the rebels in Africa, but it had not made a single effort to go to the Rhodesia; nothing could therefore be expected of the Territory and was still comfortably installed in the United Kingdom. United Nations building. He wondered how the Council could fulfil its mission without leaving New York. The 15. He realized that Malawi, which had abstained in people of South West Africa had had their fill of the vote on General Assembly resolution 2145 (XXI) at rhetoric and diplomatic hypocrisy; they believed that the 1454th plenary meeting, was in a precarious eco­ the only thing that was important and necessary now nomic situation and had therefore become a South was action.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Transnational Resistance Strategies and Subnational Concessions in Namibia's Police Zone, 1919-1962
    Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports 2021 “Remov[e] Us From the Bondage of South Africa:” Transnational Resistance Strategies and Subnational Concessions in Namibia's Police Zone, 1919-1962 Michael R. Hogan West Virginia University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd Part of the African History Commons Recommended Citation Hogan, Michael R., "“Remov[e] Us From the Bondage of South Africa:” Transnational Resistance Strategies and Subnational Concessions in Namibia's Police Zone, 1919-1962" (2021). Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports. 8264. https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd/8264 This Dissertation is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by the The Research Repository @ WVU with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Dissertation in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you must obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Dissertation has been accepted for inclusion in WVU Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports collection by an authorized administrator of The Research Repository @ WVU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. “Remov[e] Us From the Bondage of South Africa:” Transnational Resistance Strategies and Subnational Concessions in Namibia's Police Zone, 1919-1962 Michael Robert Hogan Dissertation submitted to the Eberly College of Arts and Sciences at West Virginia University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy In History Robert M.
    [Show full text]
  • Declaration Signed by the Five Prime Ministers / 1
    Declaration Signed by the Five Prime Ministers / 1 Declaration Signed by the Five Prime Ministers United Kingdom, 1944 We, The King’s Prime Ministers of the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and South Africa, have now, for the first time since the outbreak of the war, been able to meet together to discuss common problems and future plans. The representatives of India at the War Cabinet and the Prime Minister of Southern Rhodesia have joined in our deliberations and are united with us. At this memorable meeting, in the fifth year of the war, we give thanks for deliverance from the worst perils which have menaced us in the course of this long and terrible struggle against tyranny. Though hard and bitter battles lie ahead, we now see before us, in the ever growing might of the forces of the United Nations, and in the defeats already inflicted on the foe, by land, by sea and in the air, the sure presage of our future victory. To all our Armed Forces who in many lands are preserving our liberties with their lives, and to the peoples of all our countries whose efforts, fortitude and conviction have sustained the struggle, we ex press our admiration and gratitude. We honour the famous deeds of the Forces of the United States and of Soviet Russia, and pay our tribute to the fighting tenacity of the many states and nations joined with us. We re member indeed the prolonged, stubborn resistance of China, the first to be attacked by the authors of world-aggression, and we rejoice in the unquenchable spirit of our comrades in every country still in the grip of the enemy.
    [Show full text]
  • United States of America–Namibia Relations William a Lindeke*
    From confrontation to pragmatic cooperation: United States of America–Namibia relations William A Lindeke* Introduction The United States of America (USA) and the territory and people of present-day Namibia have been in contact for centuries, but not always in a balanced or cooperative fashion. Early contact involved American1 businesses exploiting the natural resources off the Namibian coast, while the 20th Century was dominated by the global interplay of colonial and mandatory business activities and Cold War politics on the one hand, and resistance diplomacy on the other. America was seen by Namibian leaders as the reviled imperialist superpower somehow pulling strings from behind the scenes. Only after Namibia’s independence from South Africa in 1990 did the relationship change to a more balanced one emphasising development, democracy, and sovereign equality. This chapter focuses primarily on the US’s contributions to the relationship. Early history of relations The US has interacted with the territory and population of Namibia for centuries – indeed, since the time of the American Revolution.2 Even before the beginning of the German colonial occupation of German South West Africa, American whaling ships were sailing the waters off Walvis Bay and trading with people at the coast. Later, major US companies were active investors in the fishing (Del Monte and Starkist in pilchards at Walvis Bay) and mining industries (e.g. AMAX and Newmont Mining at Tsumeb Copper, the largest copper mine in Africa at the time). The US was a minor trading and investment partner during German colonial times,3 accounting for perhaps 7% of exports.
    [Show full text]
  • March 03, 1976 South African Government Cabinet Minutes on Rhodesia, 3 March-1 September 1976
    Digital Archive digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org International History Declassified March 03, 1976 South African Government Cabinet Minutes on Rhodesia, 3 March-1 September 1976 Citation: “South African Government Cabinet Minutes on Rhodesia, 3 March-1 September 1976,” March 03, 1976, History and Public Policy Program Digital Archive, South African National Archives, CAB 1/1/6. Included in "Southern Africa in the Cold War, Post-1974," edited by Sue Onslow and Anna-Mart Van Wyk. http://digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org/document/118528 Summary: Excerpts from discussions on the situation in Rhodesia, the possible implications that a hostile Rhodesia would pose to South African defense calculations, and the policies South Africa should pursue with regards to Rhodesia. Credits: This document was made possible with support from the Leon Levy Foundation. Original Language: English Contents: English Transcription Report of the Rhodesia position. Worsens according to all reliable sources. Request came from Kaunda to intervene in Rhodesia as Zambia’s position is becoming untenable with regard to the purpose of a thoroughfare and bases for Cubans on their way to Rhodesia and Mozambique. According to message from this source the situation in Rhodesia has reached crisis proportions. South Africa’s standpoint remains unchanged in that it is not prepared to exert pressure on Rhodesia. South Africa did not pressurize or influence Rhodesia to have discussions. We informed Rhodesia that in calculations it must, in the case of war, operate with the assumption that it is alone. The difficult decision, however, awaits the government, namely if Rhodesia becomes involved in war could South Africa remain on the outside.
    [Show full text]
  • Washington, D.C
    SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIVIL DIVISION THE HERERO PEOPLE’S REPARATIONS CORPORATION, : a District of Columbia Corporation : 1625 K Street, NW, #102 : Washington, D.C. 20006 : : THE HEREROS, : a Tribe and Ethnic and Racial Group, : by and through its Paramount Chief : By Paramount Chief Riruako : Paramount Chief K. Riruako : P.O. Box 60991 Katutura : Windhoek, Republic of Namibia 9000 : Mburumba Getzen Kerina : P.O. Box 24861 : Windhoek, Republic of Namibia 9000 : Kurundiro Kapuuo : Case No. 01-0004447 Box 24861 : Windhoek, Republic of Namibia 9000 : Judge Jackson Calendar 2 Cornelia Tjaveondja : Next Scheduled Event: P.O. Box 24861 : Initial Scheduling Conference Windhoek, Republic of Namibia 9000 : September 18, 2001 at 9:30 a.m. Moses Nguarambuka : P.O. Box 24861 : Windhoek, Republic of Namibia 9000 : Hilde Kazakoka Kamberipa : SQ66 Genesis Street : P.O. Box 61831 : Windhoek, Republic of Namibia 9000 : Festus Korukuve : P.O. Box 50 : Opuuo (Otuzemba), Namibia : Uezuvanjo Tjihavgc : Box 27 : Opuuo, Namibia : Ujeuetu Tjihange : Box 27 : Opuuo, Namibia : Moses Katuuo : P.O. Box 930 : Gobabis, Namibia 9000 : Levy K. O. Nganjone : P.O. Box 309 : Gobabis, Namibia : Festus Ndjai : Opuuo, Namibia : Hoomajo Jjingee : Opuuo, Namibia : Uelembuia Tjinawba : Okandombo : Okunene Region, Namibia : Jararaihe Tjingee : Opuuo, Namibia : Hangekaoua Mbinge : Opuuo, Namibia : Ehrens Jeja : Box 210 : Omaruru : Omatjete, Namibia : Nathanael Uakumbua : Box 211 : Omaruru, Namibia : Rudolph Kauzuu : Box 210 : Omatjete : Omaruru, Namibia : 2 Jaendekua Kapika : Opuuo, Namibia : Ben Mbeuserua : P.O. Box 224 : Okakarara, Namibia 9000 : Felix Kokati : Box 47 : Okakarara, Namibia 9000 : Samuel Upendura : Oyinene : Omaheke Region, Namibia : Majoor Festus Kamburona : P.O. 1131 : Windhoek, Republic of Namibia 9000 : Uetavera Tjirambi : Okonmgo : Okanene Region, Namibia : Julius Katjingisiua : P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Inquiry Into Recognition of Service with the Commonwealth Monitoring Force – Rhodesia 1979-80
    INQUIRY INTO RECOGNITION OF SERVICE WITH THE COMMONWEALTH MONITORING FORCE – RHODESIA 1979-80 LETTER OF TRANSMISSION Inquiry into Recognition of Service with the Commonwealth Monitoring Force – Rhodesia 1979-80 Senator the Hon David Feeney Parliamentary Secretary for Defence Parliament House Canberra ACT 2600 Dear Parliamentary Secretary, I am pleased to present the report of the Defence Honours and Awards Tribunal on the Inquiry into Recognition of Service with the Commonwealth Monitoring Force – Rhodesia 1979-80. The inquiry was conducted in accordance with the Terms of Reference. The panel of the Tribunal that conducted the inquiry arrived unanimously at the findings and recommendations set out in its report. Yours sincerely Professor Dennis Pearce AO Chair 8 November 2010 2 CONTENTS LETTER OF TRANSMISSION.............................................................................................2 CONTENTS..............................................................................................................................3 TERMS OF REFERENCE .....................................................................................................4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .....................................................................................................5 RECOMMENDATION...........................................................................................................6 REPORT OF THE TRIBUNAL.............................................................................................7 Conduct of the Inquiry....................................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • Ufahamu: a Journal of African Studies
    UCLA Ufahamu: A Journal of African Studies Title Directory: African Liberation Movements and Support Groups Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/85p33873 Journal Ufahamu: A Journal of African Studies, 3(2) ISSN 0041-5715 Author Berman, Sanford Publication Date 1972 DOI 10.5070/F732016403 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California -171- DII{CfORY: AFRICAN LIBERATIOO r1MltNTS AND SIFffiRT ---GIUPS*· by Sanford Berman (Ed. Note: Both this Directory and the Spring 1972 Bib Ziogrc:q;hy, "African Liberation Movements 11 (Vo Z. III, No. 1) will be regularly updated by the compiler in future issues. Additions and corrections should be directed to the Compiler, c/o UFAHAMU.) AFRICAN LIBERATIOO fiMI'fNTS Frente Nacional de Libertacao de Angola (FNLA/Angolan National -Liberation Front)§ ·- Founded in 1962 by merger of Uniao dos Populacoes de Angola (UPA) and Partido Democratico Angolano (PDA). Established Governo Revolucionario de Angola no Exilio (GRAE/Angolan Revolutionary Government in Exile) 1962. Leader and GRAE Premier: Holden Roberto. Zaire Republic: Ministere de l'Information, Planet Economie, G.R.A.E., B.P. 1320, Kinshasa. Organ: Actualites (no. 3 dated March 1971). §[Recognized by the O.A.U.] *Dates in parentheses f ollowing periodical titles repre­ sent first year of pubZication. The abbreviation "AIP" indicates that a full list of material may be found in the 2nd ed. of Alternatives in Print (Columbus, Ohio: Office of Educational Services, Ohio State University Libraries, 1972). -172- Movimento _PopuZar de Libertaaao de AngoZa (MPLA/PeopZe's Movement for the Liberation of AngoZa/Mouvement PopuZaire pour Za Liberation de Z'AngoZa)§ - Founded 10 Dec.
    [Show full text]
  • Botswana's Role in the Namibian
    Journal of Namibian Studies, 14 (2013): 127 – 130 ISSN 2197-5523 (online) Review: Johann Alexander Müller, “The struggle. It is unfortunate, however, that Inevitable Pipeline into Exile.” Botswana’s he did not draw upon Parsons’ pioneer- Role in the Namibian Liberation Struggle, ing article for a broader, regional Basel, Basler Afrika Bibliographien, picture of the inflow of political refugees 2012. into Botswana and what happened to them there. And Müller’s early chapters perhaps set the scene too broadly, When introducing a set of papers on introducing too much general context. Botswana and the liberation of Southern The first chapter includes a section on Africa some years ago, this reviewer theory that many readers will probably pointed out that, though valuable, they skip over. said little about how Botswana provided political, diplomatic, material and moral While Botswana was the major east/west support to the liberation movements in ‘pipeline’ into exile for Namibians from South Africa-occupied Namibia. In one the late 1950s to the mid 1970s, of the papers Neil Parsons wrote about Müller’s book, as his subtitle suggests, the south/north ‘pipeline’ – the term is goes beyond the way in which found in official documents of the early Namibians travelled through the country 1960s – through Botswana, used most to go elsewhere. The first work to dis- famously by Nelson Mandela, under the cuss in depth the liberation struggle in Setswana alias of David Motsamayi, in Namibia in relation to Botswana, his 1962. While Parsons mentioned that
    [Show full text]
  • Hans Beukes, Long Road to Liberation. an Exiled Namibian
    Journal of Namibian Studies, 23 (2018): 101 – 123 ISSN: 2197-5523 (online) Thinking and writing liberation politics – a review article of: Hans Beukes, Long Road to Liberation . An Exiled Namibian Activist’s Perspective André du Pisani* Abstract Thinking and Writing Liberation Politics is a review article of: Hans Beukes, Long Road to Liberation. An Exiled Namibian Activist’s Perspective; with an introduction by Professor Mburumba Kerina, Johannesburg, Porcupine Press, 2014. 376 pages, appendices, photographs, index of names. ISBN: 978-1-920609-71-9. The article argues that Long Road to Liberation , being a rich, diverse, uneven memoir of an exiled Namibian activist, offers a sobering and critical account of the limits of liberation politics, of the legacies of a protracted struggle to bring Namibia to independence and of the imprint the struggle left on the political terrain of the independent state. But, it remains the perspective of an individual activist, who on account of his personal experiences and long absence from the country of his birth, at times, paints a fairly superficial picture of many internal events in the country. The protracted diplomatic-, political- and liberation struggle that culminated in the independence of Namibia in March 1990, has attracted a crop of publications written from different perspectives. This has produced many competing narratives. It would be fair to say that many of the books published over the last decade or so, differ in their range, quality and usefulness to researchers and the reading public at large. This observation also holds for memoirs, a genre of writing that is most demanding, for it requires brutal honesty, the ability to truthfully recall and engage with events that can traverse several decades.
    [Show full text]
  • ASSEMBLY 30 July 1963
    UNITED NATIONS Distr. GENERAL GENERAL A/54461Add.3 ASSEMBLY 30 July 1963 .. ORIGINAL: ENGLISH Eighteenth session REPORT OF r':'rlE 3PECI.!-,\L COMMITTEE ON THE SITUATION WITH REGARD TO THE IMPLEri1E~TATION OF THE DECLARATION ON THE GRANTING OF INDEPENDENCE TO COLONIAL COUIllTRIES AND PEOPLES* Rapporteur: Mr. Najmuddine RIFAI (Syria) SOUTHERN RHODESIA CONTENTS Paragraphs Page A. ACTION TAKEN BY THE SPECIAL CGt-1MITTEE IN 1962 AND BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY AT ITS SIXrrEENTH AND SEVENTEENTH SESSIONS • 1 - 9 2 B. INFORNI.ATION ON THE TERRITORY General 10 - 11 6 Status of the Territory 12 - 13 6 Constitution •• 14 - 15 6 1962 Elections •••••••••••• 16 - 23 7 Visit by If.!!'. R.A. Butler. •••• ••• 24 8 .. The Eanning of the Zimbabwe African Peoples Union (ZAPU) • 25 - 28 8 Proposed amendffient to the law and Order (~aintenance) Act, 1961 .................. 29 - 30 9 • C. CONSIDERATION BY THE SFECIAL COMMITTEE Introduction ••••••••• 31 10 Written petitions and hearings 32 - 44 10 General statements by ~embers 45 - 209 13 D. ACTION TAKEN BY THE SFECIAL COMMITTEE 210 - 283 67 APPENDIX. REPORT OF THE SUB-COMMITTEE ON SOUTHERN RHO:CESIA * This document contains the chapter on Southern Rhodesia. The general introductory chapter "Till be issued subsequently under the symbol A/5446. Otht:"!r chapters will be issued later in addenda. 63-16401 I· .. A/5446/Add.3 English Page 2 A. ACTION TAKEN BY THE SPECIAL COMMITTEE IN 1962 AND BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY AT ITS SIXTEENTH AND SEVENTEENTH SESSIONS 1. The Special Committee considered the question of Southern Rhodesia in 1962 at its meetings in March) April and ~ay.
    [Show full text]
  • Promoting Democracy and Good Governance
    State Formation in Namibia: Promoting Democracy and Good Governance By Hage Gottfried Geingob Submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Leeds School of Politics and International Studies March 2004 The candidate confirms that the work submitted is his own and that appropriate credit has been given where reference has been made to the work of others. This copy has been supplied on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. encourage good governance, to promote a culture of human rights, and to build state institutions to support these policies have also been examined with a view to determining the nature of the state that evolved in Namibia. Finally, the study carries out a democratic audit of Namibia using Swedish normative tools. 1 Acknowledgements The last few years have been tumultuous but exciting. Now, the academic atmosphere that provided a valuable anchor, too, must be hauled up for journeys beyond. The end of this most enjoyable academic challenge has arrived, but I cannot look back without a sense of loss - loss of continuous joys of discovery and academic enrichment. I would like to thank my supervisor, Lionel Cliffe, for his incredible support. In addition to going through many drafts and making valuable suggestions, Lionel helped me endure this long journey with his sustained encouragement. I also thank Ray Bush for going through many drafts and making valuable comments. He has an uncanny ability to visualize the final outcome of research effort.
    [Show full text]
  • UNITED. NATIONS Distr
    UNITED. NATIONS Distr. GENERAL GENERAL A/C.4/410 ASSEMBLY 22 September 1959 ORIGINAL: ENGLISH Fourteenth session FOURTH COMMITTEE Agenda item 38 QUESTION OF SOUTH WEST AFRICA Requests for hearings Note by the Secretariat: In accordance with the decision taken by the Fourth Committee at its 882nd meeting, the following communications are circulated for the information of members of the Committee. 1. Letter dated 4 March 1959 from Chief H. Kutako to the 3ecretary of the Committee on South West Africa Windhoek, 4 March 1959 Vle, the undersigned, hereby reg_uest for oral hearing before the 14th Session of the UNO General Assembly. Chief Hosea Kutako, for the Herero People!/ P.O. Box 1034 Hindhoek, South West Africa Rev. B.G. Karwaera, for the African Methodist Episcopal Church Mission P.O. Box 224 Omaruru, South West Africa Mr. John Muundjwa P.O. Box 1034 Windhoek, South West Africa (Signed) Chief H. KUTAKO 11The Secretary-General subsequently received a telegraa from Chief H. Kutako, ;hief S, Witbooi and Mr. Sam Nuyoma (Ovamboland People's Organization) reading s follows: "We allow Al Lowenstein to speak on our behalf at UNO, • Lowenstein has an on the spot investigation on conditions in South vJest ·ica. 11 59-2~ ; ... b P. A/C.4/410 English Page 2 2. Letter dated 10 April 1959 from Chief P. Kebavanyo to the Secretary of the Committee on South West Africa Zehitwa, 10 April 1959 I am hereby requesting the United Nations for oral bearing with my interpreter before the next General Assembly in behalf of the Exiled Herero People in Bechuanaland.
    [Show full text]