DOCSLIB.ORG

Conservation Design for Stormwater Management, Delaware

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Conservation Design for Stormwater Management, Delaware Conservation Design for Stormwater Management A Design Approach To Reduce Stormwater Impacts from Land Development and Achieve Multiple Objectives Related to Land Use A Joint Effort Between the Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control and The Environmental Management Center of the Brandywine Conservancy September, 1997 Conservation Design for Stormwater Management A Design Approach To Reduce Stormwater Impacts From Land Development and Achieve Multiple Objectives Related to Land Use By the Sediment and Stormwater Program Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control and The Environmental Management Center, Brandywine Conservancy Advisory Committee ! Greg Scott Consulting Engineers Council ! James McCulley Delaware Association of Homebuilders ! Rob McCleary Del. DOT - stormwater program ! Eileen Butler Delaware Nature Society ! Deborah Mills Water Resources Agency for N.C. Co. ! Mike Bennett Department of Planning (N.C. Co.) ! John Casey Delaware Contractors Association ! Roger Brickley Delaware Association of Surveyors ! Stever Abbott Natural Resources Conservation Service ! Bruce Jones N.C. Co. Public Works Hap Ryan N.C. Co. Public Works ! Joel Leidy Del. DOT - Subdivision Design ! Connie Holland Kent Co. Planning Department ! Alex Settles State Planning Coordination ! Mike Brady Sussex Co. Planning and Zoning ! Rich Baccino N.C. Conservation District ! John Garcia Kent Conservation District ! John Barwick Sussex Conservation District ! Connie Zipperer Delaware Department of Agriculture ! Vic Schuler Environmental Consulting Services, Inc. ! Cliff Short Burns & Ellis Realtors ! Harvey Rubenstein Delaware Section of the ASLA ! John Schneider DNREC - Water Resources ! John Maxted DNREC - Water Resources ! Albert Todd Chesapeake Bay Program Liaison September, 1997 Index Page Introduction Purpose i Audience ii Background ii Limitations of Structural Stormwater Management vi Conservation Design Approaches xii Watershed Wide Approaches xvi Manual Organization xvii Chapter 1 Importance of the Water Cycle in Stormwater Management The Water Cycle 1-1 Precipitation 1-4 Groundwater Recharge and Stream Baseflow 1-8 Stormwater (Surface) Runoff 1-12 Ecological Response of Urbanization and Stormwater 1-16 Other Impacts to the Water Cycle: Water Supply 1-20 and Wastewater Management Stormwater and Water Quality 1-22 Physical Types of Pollutants: Soluble vs. Particulate 1-24 Natural Mechanisms for Stormwater Pollutant 1-24 Reduction/ Mitigation Chapter 2 Site Resources and Limitations Introduction 2-1 Ecology and Landscape Position 2-1 Wetlands 2-10 Floodplains 2-13 Riparian Buffers 2-16 Forests 2-19 Meadows 2-24 Soils 2-26 Other Natural Features 2-30 Linkage with Site Development 2-33 Literature Cited 2-34 Page Chapter 3 The Conservation Design Approach: Nonstructural Conservation Techniques Defined Conservation Design Principles 3-2 Importance of Natural Processes in Conservation Design 3-3 Soil Linked Processes for Water Quality/Quantity 3-4 Management Vegetation - Based Processes for Water Quality and 3-6 Quantity Management Conservation Design: Approaches and Techniques 3-7 Conservation Design: Preventive and Mitigative 3-8 versus Structural and Nonstructural Conservation Design: Best Management Approaches (BMA’s) 3-9 and Practices (BMP’s) Conservation Design Approach: Comprehensive 3-11 Planning/Zoning (Macro/Areawide) Conservation Design Approach: Clustering/Lot Configuration 3-15 Conservation Design Approach: Reduction in Setbacks 3-24 Conservation Design Approach: Reduction in Imperviousness 3-24 Conservation Design Approach: Minimum Disturbance/ 3-34 Maintenance (Site Fingerprinting/Site Footprinting Conservation Design Practice: Vegetative 3-39 Filter Strips and Buffers Conservation Design Practice: Use of Natural Areas 3-48 Including Reforestation and Revegetation Conservation Design Practice: Terracing, Berming, 3-52 Special Grading (Terraforming) Conservation Design Practice: Grassed/Vegetative Swales 3-57 Chapter 4 The Conservation Design Procedure Introduction 4-1 The Conservation Design Procedure in Overview 4-2 The Conservation Design Procedure in Detail 4-4 Site Analysis Site Factors Inventory: What Site Physical 4-6 Factors Affect Conservation Design Site Factors Analysis: What Site Factors are Constraints 4-8 and Opportunities in terms of conservation design Use of Preventive Conservation Design Approaches 4-9 Lot Configuration and Design: How Can Lot Configuration 4-12 and Overall Site Design Prevent Stormwater Generation Impervious Coverage: Have Impervious Surfaces Been 4-14 Reduced as Much as Possible Page Minimum Disturbance/Maintenance: Has Disturbance of 4-15 Site Vegetation and Soils Been Minimized Use of Mitigative Conservation Design Practices: Which 4-19 Practices are most Effective and How Can Their Positive Effects be Maximized The Conceptual Stormwater Management Plan: How Can 4-22 All Preventive Approaches and Mitigative Techniques be Integrated Into and Optimal Conservation Design Plan Stormwater Calculations: How has Conservation Design 4-24 Affected Stormwater Calculations? What Conventional Stormwater Techniques are Necessary to Manage Any Residual Stormwater Need not Mitigated by Conservation Design Selection of Additional Stormwater Controls: If Conservation 4-28 Has Not Fully Met All Stormwater Requirements, What Additional Requirements Must Be Provided Chapter 5 Conservation Design Case Study Analysis Conservation Design Case Studies 1 and 2: Chapel Run 5-4 Conservation Design Case Study 3: Buckingham Greene 5-17 Conservation Design Case Studies 4 and 5: Tharpe Knoll 5-26 Conservation Design Case Study 6: Pleasant Hill Farm 5-38 Appendix A Biofiltration Design Procedure from the State of Washington (to be completed) Appendix B Natural Resource Conservation Service Maryland Conservation Practice “Standard Ripar- ian Forest Buffer”, July, 1996. Conservation Design for Stormwater Management Introduction “Conservation Design” is a design approach to site develop- ment that protects and incorporates natural site features into the stormwater management plan. Purpose The primary The primary purpose of this manual is to provide guidance for site de- purpose of this sign which incorporates conservation into land development. The intent is to provide an incentive for land developers to retain and incorporate manual is to natural site features into the site development process and thereby re- provide guidance duce or eliminate the need for structural stormwater management con- for site design trols. Other benefits are certainly realized through conservation design, which such as more closely approximating the predevelopment water budget, protection of habitat, and reduced overall impact to the receiving sys- incorporates tem. Site features which will be discussed in the manual include: conservation into land development. ! Wetlands ! Floodplains ! Forested areas The intent is to ! Meadows provide an ! Riparian buffers incentive for land ! Soils ! Other natural features developers to retain and Design procedures are provided which allow site designers to incorpo- incorporate rate practices, inherently known to be good, but which have not had a natural site sound rational basis to ensure plan approval. That rational basis will be provided in this manual for a variety of situations. The design approach features into the will be flexible enough to allow for various conservation practices to be site development combined on one site and quantify the benefits of that combination. process and It must be emphasized that structural controls will still be essential on thereby reduce or many sites. A heavily-wooded site having a significant portion of the eliminate the need tree canopy removed will still have a significant increase in stormwater for structural runoff, even with aggressive conservation planning. The practices de- stormwater tailed in this manual are provided as additional tools in the stormwater management toolbox. They may supplement structural control practices management and may, in some situations, replace or reduce the need for structural controls. practices while providing attractive site amenities. i Introduction Audience The manual is primarily directed toward residential land developers and users. Commercial and industrial land uses generally have a much higher level of site imperviousness, which limits the degree that conservation design can be utilized. Conservation practices are still recommended on commercial and industrial sites, but the ability of conservation prac- tices to eliminate or significantly reduce the need for structural practices on commercial or industrial sites may be limited. The Sediment and Stormwater Law July, 1989 flood in New Castle County was created in Christina Watershed response to increasing land development Background pressures which Stormwater management has been implemented at a statewide level in caused increased Delaware since July 1, 1991. The Sediment and Stormwater Law was levels and created in response to increasing land development pressures which frequency of caused increased levels and frequency of flooding, further degraded water quality, and impacted aquatic organisms and habitat. The major flooding, further catalyst for approval of the law was a flood in July, 1989 which caused degraded water significant property damage. This flood heightened public awareness to quality, and the cumulative nature of flooding problems caused by continued land impacts to aquatic development. organisms and In addition
Load more

Recommended publications
  • FLATTER Bay Horse; Foaled 1999 Bold Reasoning Seattle Slew
    FLATTER Bay Horse; foaled 1999 Bold Reasoning Seattle Slew ................... My Charmer A.P. Indy ........................ Secretariat Weekend Surprise........... Lassie Dear FLATTER Raise a Native Mr. Prospector ................ Gold Digger Praise ............................ (1994) Northern Dancer Wild Applause ................ Glowing Tribute By A.P. INDY (1989). Horse of the year, classic winner of $2,979,815, Belmont S. [G1], etc. Leading sire twice, sire of 142 black-type winners, 11 champions, including Mineshaft [G1] ($2,283,402), Rags to Riches [G1] ($1,342,528), Bernardini [G1] ($3,060,480), and of Aptitude [G1] ($1,965,410), Stephen Got Even [G1] ($1,019,200), Pulpit [G1] ($728,200). 1st dam PRAISE, by Mr. Prospector. 2 wins at 3, $61,180. Dam of 6 foals, 4 winners-- CONGRATS (c. by A.P. Indy). 7 wins, 2 to 5, $818,960, in N.A./U.S., San Pasqual H. [G2] (SA, $90,000), Alysheba S. [L] (CD, $70,432), 2nd Santa Anita H. [G1] (SA, $200,000), Memorial Day H. [G3] (CRC, $20,000), Ack Ack H. [L] (HOL, $15,570), 3rd Hollywood Gold Cup H. [G1] (HOL, $90,000), Jim Dandy S. [G2] (SAR, $55,000), Washington Park H. [G2] (AP, $38,500), San Antonio H. [G2] (SA, $30,000). (Total: $998,960). Sire. Flatter (c. by A.P. Indy). Subject stallion. Fete (g. by Horse Chestnut (SAF)). 11 wins at 3 and 4, $310,208. Gigger (g. by Go for Gin). 4 wins, 2 to 6, $100,590. 2nd dam WILD APPLAUSE, by Northern Dancer. 5 wins in 10 starts at 2 and 3, $240,136, Diana H.-G2, Comely S.-G3, 2nd Test S.-G2, 3rd Mother Goose S.-G1.
    [Show full text]
  • News Release ______
    News Release _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Contact: Kevin Kerstein Publicity Manager Churchill Downs Racetrack (610) 420-6971 (mobile) (502) 635-4712 (office) [email protected] ‘WE’VE FOUND OUR WAY HOME’: HARDIN BROTHERS BRING PASSION OF HORSE RACING TO CHURCHILL DOWNS STABLE GATE LOUISVILLE, KY (Sunday, May 23, 2021) – Donnie and Ken Hardin are hard to miss when backside employees enter the Churchill Downs Stable Gate each morning. The brothers, who work on the security team, bring their passion of horse racing and the spirit of their father with them to each shift at Churchill Downs. “Churchill Downs stands for everything I love,” Ken simply stated. The Hardin’s faces light up every time a new horse racing star enters the stable gate or when they get the opportunity to tell a story about horses that strike up memories of their father. The Stable Gate office is filled with horse racing memorabilia and different photos where all of the employees, not just the Hardins, can share personal stories. One specific photo of Churchill Downs’ all-time leading jockey Pat Day brings back memories of the Hardins’ late father, Charles, every time they enter the office. “I was about 14-years-old when Pat Day won the (1992) Kentucky Derby (aboard Lil E Tee) but I remember it well,” Donnie said. “My dad was taken back by the legendary jockey’s humble demeanor after his big accomplishment. I learned a lot from that. “The next spring Churchill Downs had an autograph session featuring Pat Day. At the time, I collected sports trading cards, including jockey cards.
    [Show full text]
  • ALL the PRETTY HORSES.Hwp
    ALL THE PRETTY HORSES Cormac McCarthy Volume One The Border Trilogy Vintage International• Vintage Books A Division of Random House, Inc. • New York I THE CANDLEFLAME and the image of the candleflame caught in the pierglass twisted and righted when he entered the hall and again when he shut the door. He took off his hat and came slowly forward. The floorboards creaked under his boots. In his black suit he stood in the dark glass where the lilies leaned so palely from their waisted cutglass vase. Along the cold hallway behind him hung the portraits of forebears only dimly known to him all framed in glass and dimly lit above the narrow wainscotting. He looked down at the guttered candlestub. He pressed his thumbprint in the warm wax pooled on the oak veneer. Lastly he looked at the face so caved and drawn among the folds of funeral cloth, the yellowed moustache, the eyelids paper thin. That was not sleeping. That was not sleeping. It was dark outside and cold and no wind. In the distance a calf bawled. He stood with his hat in his hand. You never combed your hair that way in your life, he said. Inside the house there was no sound save the ticking of the mantel clock in the front room. He went out and shut the door. Dark and cold and no wind and a thin gray reef beginning along the eastern rim of the world. He walked out on the prairie and stood holding his hat like some supplicant to the darkness over them all and he stood there for a long time.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidance on Water Cycle Management for New Developments
    CIRIA C690 London, 2010 WaND Guidance on water cycle management for new developments D Butler University of Exeter FA Memon University of Exeter C Makropoulos National Technical University of Athens A Southall University of Exeter L Clarke CIRIA Classic House, 174–180 Old Street, London EC1V 9BP TEL: 020 7549 3300 FAX: 020 7253 0523 EMAIL: [email protected] WEBSITE: www.ciria.org WaND Guidance on water cycle management for new developments Butler, D, Memon, FA, Makropoulos, C, Southall, A, Clarke, L CIRIA C690 © CIRIA 2010 RP777 ISBN: 978-086017-690-9 British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record is available for this book from the British Library. Keywords Sustainable water cycle management, greywater, rainwater harvesting, SUDS, water efficiency, stakeholder engagement, sustainability, water and new developments (WAND) water management CIRIA Themes Sustainable water management, flood risk management and surface water drainage, sustainability and the built environment Reader interest Classification Land-use planning, water Availability Unrestricted industry, water supply, water Content Advice/guidance, original research resources, water use, environmental regulation, Status Author’s opinion, committee-guided provision and maintenance of USER Land-use planners, water industry, sustainable water management environmental regulators, developers systems Published by CIRIA, Classic house, 174-180 Old Street, London, EC1V 9BP This publication is designed to provide accurate and authoritative information on the subject matter covered. It is sold and/or distributed with the understanding that neither the authors nor the publisher is thereby engaged in rendering a specific legal or any other professional service. While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy and completeness of the publication, no warranty or fitness is provided or implied, and the authors and publisher shall have neither liability nor responsibility to any person or entity with respect to any loss or damage arising from its use.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Media Guide NYRA.Com 1 FIRST RUNNING the First Running of the Belmont Stakes in 1867 at Jerome Park Took Place on a Thursday
    2018 Media Guide NYRA.com 1 FIRST RUNNING The first running of the Belmont Stakes in 1867 at Jerome Park took place on a Thursday. The race was 1 5/8 miles long and the conditions included “$200 each; half forfeit, and $1,500-added. The second to receive $300, and an English racing saddle, made by Merry, of St. James TABLE OF Street, London, to be presented by Mr. Duncan.” OLDEST TRIPLE CROWN EVENT CONTENTS The Belmont Stakes, first run in 1867, is the oldest of the Triple Crown events. It predates the Preakness Stakes (first run in 1873) by six years and the Kentucky Derby (first run in 1875) by eight. Aristides, the winner of the first Kentucky Derby, ran second in the 1875 Belmont behind winner Calvin. RECORDS AND TRADITIONS . 4 Preakness-Belmont Double . 9 FOURTH OLDEST IN NORTH AMERICA Oldest Triple Crown Race and Other Historical Events. 4 Belmont Stakes Tripped Up 19 Who Tried for Triple Crown . 9 The Belmont Stakes, first run in 1867, is one of the oldest stakes races in North America. The Phoenix Stakes at Keeneland was Lowest/Highest Purses . .4 How Kentucky Derby/Preakness Winners Ran in the Belmont. .10 first run in 1831, the Queens Plate in Canada had its inaugural in 1860, and the Travers started at Saratoga in 1864. However, the Belmont, Smallest Winning Margins . 5 RUNNERS . .11 which will be run for the 150th time in 2018, is third to the Phoenix (166th running in 2018) and Queen’s Plate (159th running in 2018) in Largest Winning Margins .
    [Show full text]
  • Water Cycle Management Study
    Lowes Creek Maryland Precinct Water Cycle Management Study Water Cycle Management Study Lowes Creek Maryland Precinct 80215038 26 September 2018 80215038 | 26 September 2018 Cardno i Lowes Creek Maryland Precinct Water Cycle Management Study Contact Information Document Information Cardno (NSW/ACT) Pty Ltd Prepared for Department of Planning Trading as Cardno (NSW/ACT) and Environment ABN 95 001 145 035 Project Name Lowes Creek Maryland Precinct Level 9, The Forum, 203 Pacific Highway File Reference 80215038 Lowes Creek St Leonards NSW 2065 Maryland Draft WCMS PO Box 19 St Leonards NSW 1590 RevF.docx Telephone: 02 9496 7700 Job Reference 80215038 Facsimile: 02 9439 5170 Date 26 September 2018 International: +61 2 9496 7700 [email protected] www.cardno.com Version Number Rev F Author(s): Edmund Han Engineer Pak Lau Effective Date 26/9/2018 Engineer Approved By: David Stone Principal Water Engineer Date Approved: 26/9/2018 Document History Version Effective Description of Revision Prepared by: Reviewed by: Date Martin Griffin Preliminary Finding for Rev A 21/09/2016 Venus Jofreh Emma Maratea Stakeholder Workshop Sabina Lohani Martin Griffin Rev B 20/01/2016 Draft Report for Client Review Andrew Simon Emma Maratea Jenifer Hammond Edmund Han Rev C 26/07/2018 Draft Report for Client Review David Stone Pak Lau Edmund Han Rev D 10/08/2018 Draft Report for Client Review David Stone Pak Lau Edmund Han Rev E 7/09/2018 Draft Report for Client Review David Stone Pak Lau Edmund Han Rev F 26/09/2018 Draft Report for Client Review David Stone Pak Lau © Cardno.
    [Show full text]
  • Low Impact Development in Coastal South Carolina: a Planning and Design Guide
    LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT IN COASTAL SOUTH CAROLINA: A PLANNING AND DESIGN GUidE Low Impact Development in Coastal South Carolina: A Planning and Design Guide This publication was made possible through support from the National Estuarine Research Reserve System Sci- ence Collaborative, a partnership of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and the University of New Hampshire. The Science Collaborative advances the use of science in coastal decision making by engag- ing intended users of the science in the research process—from problem definition to practical application of results. Cover Photo credits: Kathryn Ellis, Kathryn Ellis, Seamon Whiteside + Associates, Erik Smith. Recommended Citation for this Guidebook: Ellis, K., C. Berg, D. Caraco, S. Drescher, G. Hoffmann, B. Keppler, M. LaRocco, and A.Turner. 2014. Low Impact Development in Coastal South Carolina: A Planning and Design Guide. ACE Basin and North Inlet – Winyah Bay National Estuarine Research Reserves, 462 pp. Download a digital copy of this document and the spreadsheet tools at http://www.northinlet.sc.edu/LID Low Impact Development in Coastal South Carolina: A Planning and Design Guide ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Project Team Sadie Drescher, Center for Watershed Protection Kathryn Ellis, EIT, North Inlet-Winyah Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve Greg Hoffmann, P.E., Center for Watershed Protection Blaik Keppler, SC Department of Natural Resources & ACE Basin National Estuarine Research Reserve April Turner, South Carolina Sea Grant Consortium Michelle LaRocco, North Inlet-Winyah Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve; University of South Carolina Wendy Allen, North Inlet-Winyah Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve; University of South Carolina Advisory Committee The Advisory Committee provided guidance and feedback on the content of this document, devel- oped and participated in workshops, and engaged stakeholders.
    [Show full text]
  • Of the Swale Local Plan
    Sustainability Appraisal (SA) of the Swale Local Plan SA Report February 2021 SA of the Swale Local Plan Review SA Report Quality information Prepared by Checked by Verified by Approved by Chris McNulty, Mark Fessey, Steve Smith, Steve Smith, Senior consultant Associate Director Technical Director Technical Director Mark Fessey, Associate Director Prepared for: Swale Borough Council Prepared by: AECOM Limited Aldgate Tower 2 Leman Street London E1 8FA United Kingdom aecom.com © 2021 AECOM Limited. All Rights Reserved. This document has been prepared by AECOM Limited (“AECOM”) in accordance with its contract Swale Borough Council (the “Client”) and in accordance with generally accepted consultancy principles and the established budget. Any information provided by third parties and referred to herein has not been checked or verified by AECOM, unless otherwise expressly stated in the document. AECOM shall have no liability to any third party that makes use of or relies upon this document. AECOM SA of the Swale Local Plan Review SA Report Table of Contents 1 Introduction ...................................................................................................... 1 2 What’s the plan seeking to achieve? ............................................................... 2 3 What is the scope of the SA? .......................................................................... 4 Part 1: What has plan-making / SA involved up to this stage? ................................... 6 4 Introduction to Part 1 ......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Urban Water Management — Why a Good Productivity Commission Idea Seems Hard to Implement Research Paper
    Integrated Urban Water Management — Why a good Productivity Commission idea seems hard to implement Research Paper March 2020 Commonwealth of Australia 2020 ISBN 978-1-74037-691-4 (PDF) ISBN 978-1-74037-690-7 (Print) Except for the Commonwealth Coat of Arms and content supplied by third parties, this copyright work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia licence. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au. In essence, you are free to copy, communicate and adapt the work, as long as you attribute the work to the Productivity Commission (but not in any way that suggests the Commission endorses you or your use) and abide by the other licence terms. Use of the Commonwealth Coat of Arms Terms of use for the Coat of Arms are available from the Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet’s website: https://www.pmc.gov.au/government/commonwealth-coat-arms Third party copyright Wherever a third party holds copyright in this material, the copyright remains with that party. Their permission may be required to use the material, please contact them directly. Attribution This work should be attributed as follows, Source: Productivity Commission, Integrated Urban Water Management — Why a good idea seems hard to implement. If you have adapted, modified or transformed this work in anyway, please use the following, Source: based on Productivity Commission data, Integrated Urban Water Management — Why a good idea seems hard to implement, Commission Research Paper. An appropriate reference for this publication is: Productivity Commission 2020, Integrated Urban Water Management — Why a good idea seems hard to implement, Commission Research Paper, Canberra.
    [Show full text]
  • Ms4 Stormwater Permitting Guide
    MS4 STORMWATER PERMITTING GUIDE presented by: The National Association of Clean Water Agencies This work is protected by copyright owned by the National Association of Clean Water Agencies (NACWA) and may not be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without the consent of NACWA. This work contains information on legal issues associated with national pollutant discharge elimination system permits for municipal separate storm sewer systems. AquaLaw PLC assisted with development of this work under contract with NACWA. This work does not constitute legal advice from AquaLaw or NACWA to NACWA’s members or any other readers. This work should not be construed as legal advice to NACWA members or others who might read it. NACWA’s production of this work does not replace an independent legal evaluation of relevant issues. This work is provided “as is” and any express or implied warranties, including, but not limited to, the implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose are disclaimed. In no event shall NACWA, AquaLaw, or any contributors be liable for any direct, indirect, incidental, special, or consequential damages as a result of use of this work. NACWA has no obligation to update this work or make notification of any changes to the information discussed in the work. Neither NACWA, AquaLaw, nor any member of NACWA’s volunteer review team assume any liability resulting from the use or reliance upon any information, guidance, suggestions, conclusions, or opinions in this work. Copyright © 2018 National Association of Clean Water Agencies Acknowledgements The Stormwater Permitting Guide was produced by the National Association of Clean Water Agencies (NACWA) under the direction of its Board of Directors, Chief Executive Officer Adam Krantz, Director of Regulatory Affairs Emily Remmel and Deputy General Counsel Erica Spitzig.
    [Show full text]
  • GOLDEN SLEW 1999 Bay - Height 17.2 - Dosage Profile: 13-1-12-2-0; DI: 2.50; CD: +0.89
    GOLDEN SLEW 1999 Bay - Height 17.2 - Dosage Profile: 13-1-12-2-0; DI: 2.50; CD: +0.89 RACE AND (STAKES) RECORD *Nasrullah Bold Ruler Miss Disco Age Starts 1st 2nd 3rd Earnings Boldnesian Polynesian 2 unraced Alanesian Alablue 3 5100 $27,720 Bold Reasoning *Turn-to 4 5000 360 Hail to Reason Nothirdchance 10 100 $28,080 Reason to Earn Wait a Bit Sailing Home Marching Home Seattle Slew (1974) At 3, WON a maiden special weight race at Belmont Park (1 *Princequillo Round Table 1/16 mi., defeating This Guns for Hire, Foreign Authori- *Knight’s Daughter Poker ty, Indiana Knight, etc.). *Nasrullah Glamour Striking My Charmer IN THE STUD Jet Pilot Jet Action Busher GOLDEN SLEW entered stud in 2004. Fair Charmer Alsab Myrtle Charm Crepe Myrtle STATISTICAL SUMMARY Golden Slew Native Dancer (Through September 28, 2009) Raise a Native Raise You Mr. Prospector 3 crops Lifetime Lifetime 2yo Nashua Gold Digger Foals of racing age 30 30 Sequence Gold Alert Starters (/Fls) 12(40%) 8(27%) *Ribot Arts and Letters Winners (/Str) 2(17%) 0(0%) All Beautiful Croquis Total Starts 67 25 Cyane Unity Hall Total Wins (/Starts) 2(3%) 0(0%) Rum Bottle Bay Golden Bri (1992) Total Earnings $78,898 $26,493 Nearco Nearctic *Lady Angela Avg. Earnings (/Str) $6,575 $3,312 Briartic Round Table Avg. Earnings (/Start) $1,178 $1,060 Sweet Lady Briar Parading Lady Stakes Wnrs (/Str) 0(0%) 0(0%) Princess Bri Raise a Native Stakes Horses (/Str) 0(0%) 0(0%) Majestic Prince Gay Hostess Avg.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Water Cycle Management Study Water Sensitive Urban Design Component
    Integrated Water Cycle Management Study Water Sensitive Urban Design Component March 2007 Report by: Ecological Engineering Pty Ltd Lv 7, 249 Pitt St Sydney NSW 2000 Report for: Growth Centres Commission This document has been prepared solely for the benefit of Landcom and is issued in confidence for the purposes only for which it is supplied. Unauthorised use of this document in any form whatsoever is prohibited. No liability is accepted by Ecological Engineering Pty Ltd or any employee, contractor, or sub-consultant of this company with respect to its use by any other person. This disclaimer shall apply notwithstanding that the document may be made available to other persons for an application for permission or approval to fulfil a legal obligation. Document Control Sheet Report title: Oran Park Integrated Water Cycle Management Study Water Sensitive Urban Design Component Suggested Reference: Ecological Engineering (2007). Oran Park Integrated Water Cycle Management Study. Water Sensitive Urban Design Component. Report by Ecological Engineering, to GCC. Ecological Engineering, Sydney. Version: Report Author(s): Peter Gillam, Kerrie Burge, Tony Wong and Richard McManus Approved by: Tony Wong Signed: Date: March 2007 Distribution: APP i Table of Contents 8.1.4 Water demand summary for Oran Park with demand management .............. 21 8.1.5 Treated blackwater for non potable substitution at Oran Park ..................... 21 Executive Summary ............................................................................................................1 8.2 Stormwater for non potable substitution at Oran Park ..................................... 22 1 Introduction ...........................................................................................................2 8.2.1 Stormwater harvesting for residential reuse................................................. 22 2 WATER MANAGEMENT PRINCIPLES AND OBJECTIVES FOR ORAN PARK .....................3 8.2.2 Stormwater harvesting for employment, retail and commercial reuse .........
    [Show full text]