Of the Swale Local Plan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Of the Swale Local Plan Sustainability Appraisal (SA) of the Swale Local Plan SA Report February 2021 SA of the Swale Local Plan Review SA Report Quality information Prepared by Checked by Verified by Approved by Chris McNulty, Mark Fessey, Steve Smith, Steve Smith, Senior consultant Associate Director Technical Director Technical Director Mark Fessey, Associate Director Prepared for: Swale Borough Council Prepared by: AECOM Limited Aldgate Tower 2 Leman Street London E1 8FA United Kingdom aecom.com © 2021 AECOM Limited. All Rights Reserved. This document has been prepared by AECOM Limited (“AECOM”) in accordance with its contract Swale Borough Council (the “Client”) and in accordance with generally accepted consultancy principles and the established budget. Any information provided by third parties and referred to herein has not been checked or verified by AECOM, unless otherwise expressly stated in the document. AECOM shall have no liability to any third party that makes use of or relies upon this document. AECOM SA of the Swale Local Plan Review SA Report Table of Contents 1 Introduction ...................................................................................................... 1 2 What’s the plan seeking to achieve? ............................................................... 2 3 What is the scope of the SA? .......................................................................... 4 Part 1: What has plan-making / SA involved up to this stage? ................................... 6 4 Introduction to Part 1 ....................................................................................... 7 5 Establishing growth scenarios ......................................................................... 9 6 Growth scenarios appraisal ........................................................................... 34 7 The preferred growth scenario ....................................................................... 38 Part 2: What are the appraisal findings at this stage? .............................................. 39 8 Introduction to Part 2 ..................................................................................... 40 9 Appraisal of the Local Plan Review ............................................................... 42 Part 3: What are the next steps? .............................................................................. 82 10 Plan finalisation ............................................................................................. 83 11 Monitoring ...................................................................................................... 83 Appendix I: Regulatory requirements ....................................................................... 84 Appendix II: Review of evidence .............................................................................. 88 Appendix III: Broad growth scenarios ...................................................................... 115 Appendix IV: Strategic site options ......................................................................... 120 Appendix V: Site options GIS analysis ................................................................... 123 Appendix VI: Sub area scenarios ........................................................................... 126 Appendix VII: Growth scenarios ............................................................................. 146 Non-technical Summary Technical Appendix AECOM SA of the Swale Local Plan Review SA Report 1 Introduction 1.1 Background 1.1.1 AECOM is commissioned to undertake Sustainability Appraisal (SA) in support of the emerging Swale Local Plan Review (LPR). Once in place, the LPR will establish a spatial strategy for growth and change - in response to key issues and opportunities - over the period 2022 to 2038. The LPR will build on the adopted Local Plan (‘Bearing Fruits’), which covers the period 2014 to 2031. The LPR will allocate sites to deliver the strategy and establish the policies against which planning applications will be determined. 1.1.2 SA is a mechanism for considering and communicating the likely effects of an emerging plan, and alternatives, with a view to minimising adverse effects and maximising the positives. SA of Local Plans is a legal requirement.1 1.2 SA explained 1.2.1 It is a requirement that SA is undertaken in-line with the procedures prescribed by the Environmental Assessment of Plans and Programmes Regulations 2004, which were prepared in order to transpose into national law the EU Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Directive. 1.2.2 In-line with the Regulations, a report (known as the SA Report) must be published for consultation alongside the draft plan that essentially ‘identifies, describes and evaluates’ the likely significant effects of implementing ‘the plan and reasonable alternatives’. The report must then be considered alongside consultation responses when finalising the plan. 1.2.3 More specifically, the SA Report must answer the following three questions: • What has Plan-making / SA involved up to this point? ─ including with regards to consideration of 'reasonable alternatives’ • What are the SA findings at this stage? ─ i.e. in relation to the draft plan • What are next steps? 1.3 This SA Report2 1.3.1 This is the SA Report for the Swale LPR. It is published alongside the proposed submission version of the LPR (known as the ‘Pre-submission LPR’), in line with the requirements set out under Regulation 19 of the Local Planning Regulations (2012). 1.3.2 The aim is to inform representations and subsequent plan finalisation. Structure of this report 1.3.3 This report is broken down into three parts, according to the three questions above. Before answering the first question, there is a need to further set the scene by answering two initial questions: • What is the plan seeking to achieve? • What is the scope of the SA? 1 Since provision was made through the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 it has been understood that local planning authorities must carry out a process of Sustainability Appraisal alongside plan-making. The centrality of SA to Local Plan-making is emphasised in the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF, 2019). The Town and Country Planning (Local Planning) Regulations 2012 require that an SA Report is published for consultation alongside the ‘Proposed Submission’ plan document 2 See Appendix I for further explanation of the regulatory basis for answering certain questions within the SA Report, and a ‘checklist’ explaining more precisely how and where regulatory requirements are met / are being met. Introduction 1 SA of the Swale Local Plan Review SA Report 2 What’s the plan seeking to achieve? 2.1 Introduction 2.1.1 The aim here is to explain more fully the context to plan preparation and the plan vision / objectives. 2.2 The plan area and plan period 2.2.1 The LPR covers the entirety of Swale Borough and aims to cover the period 2022 to 2038. The beginning of the plan period is set at 2022 in light of paragraph 33 of the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF), which explains that Local Plans should be reviewed at least once every five years. 2.2.2 An important point to note is that there is a large supply of housing that is already committed, in that it is set to come forward at a site already planning permission and/or an allocation in the current Local plan. A small proportion of this will come forward in 2021, but the great majority is expected to deliver housing in the period 2022 to 2038. These sites will be ‘rolled-forward’ into the new LPR, such that the task of the LPR can be thought of as building on a baseline position characterised by existing committed supply. Indeed, committed housing supply that is expected to deliver in the LPR plan period amounts to around 2/3 of the total housing need for the LPR plan period (see discussion in Section 5.2), which leads to a good degree of flexibility when preparing the LPR, particularly in respect of selecting sites for allocation. 2.3 Legislative and policy context 2.3.1 The Local Plan is being prepared under the Town and Country (Local Planning) Regulations 2012 and underpinning primary legislation. It must reflect current government policy, as set out in the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF, 2019) and Planning Policy for Traveller Sites (2015) and must also be prepared mindful of Government’s online Planning Practice Guidance (PPG). In particular, the NPPF requires local authorities to take a positive approach to development, with an up-to-date local plan that meets objectively assessed development needs, as far as is consistent with sustainable development. 2.3.2 The plan is also being prepared taking account of objectives and policies established by various organisations at the national and more local levels, in accordance with the Duty to Cooperate established by the Localism Act 2011. For example, context is provided by the strategic policies of Kent County Council, the South East Local Enterprise Partnership (LEP) and environmental bodies including the Environment Agency, Historic England and Natural England. Swale BC must also cooperate with neighbouring areas in respect of ‘larger than local’ considerations, including planning for housing needs, capitalising on growth opportunities across the Thames Gateway and planning for the Kent Downs AONB. 2.3.3 Finally, it is important to note that the plan will be prepared mindful of any ‘made’ or emerging Neighbourhood Development Plans (NDPs), with a made Neighbourhood Plan for Faversham Creek and several others
Recommended publications
  • Progress Summary
    CLIMATE EMERGENCY PROGRESS CHECKLIST - 10 December 2019 NB. This is work in progress! We have almost certainly missed some actions. Please contact [email protected] with any news or updates. County/Authority Council Status County/Authority Council Status Brighton & Hove BRIGHTON & HOVE CITY COUNCIL DECLARED Dec 2018 KENT COUNTY COUNCIL Motion Passed May 2019 WEST SUSSEX COUNTY COUNCIL Motion Passed - April 2019 Ashford Borough Council Motion Passed July 2019 Adur Borough Council DECLARED July 2019 Canterbury City Council DECLARED July 2019 Arun District Council DECLARED Nov 2019 Dartford Borough Council DECLARED Oct 2019 Chichester City Council DECLARED June 2019 Dover District Council Campaign in progress West Sussex Chichester District Council DECLARED July 2019 Folkestone and Hythe District Council DECLARED July 2019 Crawley Borough Council DECLARED July 2019 Gravesham Borough Council DECLARED June 2019 Kent Horsham District Council Motion Passed - June 2019 Maidstone Borough Council DECLARED April 2019 Mid Sussex District Council Motion Passed - June 2019 Medway Council DECLARED April 2019 Worthing Borough Council DECLARED July 2019 Sevenoaks District Council Motion Passed - Nov 2019 EAST SUSSEX COUNTY COUNCIL DECLARED Oct 2019 Swale Borough Council DECLARED June 2019 Eastbourne Borough Council DECLARED July 2019 Thanet District Council DECLARED July 2019 Hastings Borough Council DECLARED Dec 2018 Tonbridge and Malling Borough Council Motion Passed July 2019 East Sussex Lewes District Council DECLARED July 2019 Tunbridge
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda Item No 4 4 Minutes of the Meeting of the EAST KENT (JOINT SCRUTINY) COMMITTEE Held at the Council Offices, Whitfield On
    Agenda Item No 4 Minutes of the meeting of the EAST KENT (JOINT SCRUTINY) COMMITTEE held at the Council Offices, Whitfield on Wednesday 25 April 2012 at 9.30 am. Present: Chairman: Councillor K Mills (Dover District Council) Councillors: B Copping (Shepway District Council) G Glover (Canterbury City Council) I Gregory (Thanet District Council) D Hannent (Dover District Council) G Lymer (Dover District Council) Z Wiltshire (Thanet District Council) Also Present: Director of Shared Services (EK Services) Officers: Chief Executive (Dover District Council) Solicitor to the Council (Dover District Council) Democratic Support Officer (Dover District Council) Apologies for absence were received from Councillors H Cragg, M Dance, C Goddard, D Green, J Holben, I Linfield, R Manning and M Vye. 13 ELECTION OF A CHAIRMAN It was proposed by Councillor G Lymer, duly seconded and RESOLVED: That Councillor K Mills be appointed Chairman for the duration of the meeting. 14 DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST There were no declarations of interest made by Members. 15 MINUTES The Minutes of the meetings of the Committee held on 25 January 2012 were approved as a correct record and signed by the Chairman. 16 OPERATING ARRANGEMENTS The Committee considered the operating arrangements. RESOLVED: That the operating arrangements be noted. 17 ISSUES REFERRED TO THE COMMITTEE BY THE EAST KENT (JOINT ARRANGEMENTS) COMMITTEE The Committee noted that at the meeting of the East Kent (Joint Arrangements) Committee (EKJAC) held on 14 March 2012 it had been resolved to undertake a review of the operating arrangements of the two East Kent committees, which would be reported to the next meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • Sheerness to the Oasis Academy East and West Sites
    373S SITTINGBOURNE - OASIS ACADEMY 373S SITTINGBOURNE - OASIS ACADEMY Refer to the KCC transport website MORNING PICK UP POINTS & TIMES AFTERNOON PICK UP POINTS & TIMES for information on how to apply for the www.travel-masters.co.uk 07:25 Snipshill 15:10 Oasis Minster East Site 07:27 St Michaels Road 15:11 Scrapsgate Road 07:28 Bus Hub - Sittingbourne Station 15:12 Harps Inn - Fleetwood Close 07:30 Aida Kebab - London Rd, Sittingbourne 15:14 Bottom Wards Hill - Broadway Minster 373 Bus Services 07:31 Chalkwell Road, Opp Tesco Express 15:15 White House KCC 07:32 Chalkwell Road, Youth Centre 15:16 Ship on Shore 07:33 Crown Road 15:18 Sheerness, Yacht Club 07:34 Milton High Street 15:20 Sheerness, Oasis Academy West Site 07:35 North Street 15:21 Richmond Street TRAVEL 07:36 Grovehurst Road, Opp Blue Houses 15:22 KS Casino 07:37 Kemsley, Opp Recreation Park 15:22 Sheerness Broadway - Catholic Church 07:38 Kemsley Railway Station 15:23 Trinity Road 07:38 Kemsley, Opp Post Office 15:24 High Street - Fire Station SAVER 07:39 Iwade - Grovehurst Rd 15:24 Millenium Way, Aldi 07:40 Iwade - Opp Helen Thompson Close 15:25 Sheerness Train Station 07:40 Iwade - School Lane 15:28 Brielle Way - Pacific Windows www.kent.gov.uk/education-and- 07:41 Iwade - Sanderling Way 15:31 Main Rd - Castlemere Avenue children/schools/school-transport/KCC-travel-saver 07:44 Sheppey Way 15:32 Queenborough Station 07:48 Thornsett Way, Opp Morrisons 15:33 Rushenden Road, Klondyke Bus Stop 07:49 Rushenden Road, Klondyke Bus Stop 15:35 Thornsett Way, Morrisons 07:50 Queenborough Station 15:38 Sheppey Way • Contactless Payments 07:51 Main Rd - Castlemere Avenue 15:40 Iwade - Sanderling Way • Cash Tickets 07:55 Brielle Way - Pacific Windows 15:41 Iwade - School Lane 07:58 Opp.
    [Show full text]
  • Royal Celebrations
    Lynsted with Kingsdown Society Royal Celebrations a view from our Parish Price £7.50 Printed November 2012 Prepared and Published by The Lynsted with Kingsdown Society For information about the Society see our website: lynsted-society.co.uk Email: [email protected] 2012 Contents Introduction & acknowledgements i ~~~ Over a century of royal celebrations ~~~ 1 Queen Victoria’s Coronation 5 ~~~ Queen Victoria Diamond Jubilee Pump 9 ~~~ Queen Victoria’s death commemorated ~~~ 13 Coronation of Edward VII ~~~ 15 Coronation of George V 17 ~~~ Intervening years 19 ~~~ Duke of York’s visit 21 ~~~ George V’s Silver Jubilee 25 ~~~ George VI’s Coronation ~~~ 31 Sixty years of happiness ~~~ 39 Queen Elizabeth II Coronation ~~~ 41 Queen Elizabeth II Silver Jubilee ~~~ 49 Wedding of Prince Charles and Lady Diana Spencer ~~~ 53 Queen Elizabeth II’s Golden Jubilee ~~~ 55 Wedding of Prince William & Katherine Middleton ~~~ 67 Queen Elizabeth II Diamond Jubilee ~~~ 73 Conclusion ~~~ 79 Endnotes ~~~ 81 Introduction and acknowledgements n planning this publication, the Lynsted with Kingsdown Society Committee took as their inspiration the many national and local celebrations of ‘royal events’ in 2012. As I we dug more deeply, we discovered how such events have touched on the lives of local people in and around the Parish. The story really begins with our thanks to the generosity of many families who have shared with us their images, stories and documents to add to our on-going Heritage Project. The sub-group has added some further research, to help us understand what the conditions were like in our Parish as ‘royal celebrations’ became honoured locally right up to the modern day.
    [Show full text]
  • Edward Hasted the History and Topographical Survey of the County
    Edward Hasted The history and topographical survey of the county of Kent, second edition, volume 6 Canterbury 1798 <i> THE HISTORY AND TOPOGRAPHICAL SURVEY OF THE COUNTY OF KENT. CONTAINING THE ANTIENT AND PRESENT STATE OF IT, CIVIL AND ECCLESIASTICAL; COLLECTED FROM PUBLIC RECORDS, AND OTHER AUTHORITIES: ILLUSTRATED WITH MAPS, VIEWS, ANTIQUITIES, &c. THE SECOND EDITION, IMPROVED, CORRECTED, AND CONTINUED TO THE PRESENT TIME. By EDWARD HASTED, Esq. F. R. S. and S. A. LATE OF CANTERBURY. Ex his omnibus, longe sunt humanissimi qui Cantium incolunt. Fortes creantur fortibus et bonis, Nec imbellem feroces progenerant. VOLUME VI. CANTERBURY PRINTED BY W. BRISTOW, ON THE PARADE. M.DCC.XCVIII. <ii> <blank> <iii> TO THOMAS ASTLE, ESQ. F. R. S. AND F. S. A. ONE OF THE TRUSTEES OF THE BRITISH MUSEUM, KEEPER OF THE RECORDS IN THE TOWER, &c. &c. SIR, THOUGH it is certainly a presumption in me to offer this Volume to your notice, yet the many years I have been in the habit of friendship with you, as= sures me, that you will receive it, not for the worth of it, but as a mark of my grateful respect and esteem, and the more so I hope, as to you I am indebted for my first rudiments of antiquarian learning. You, Sir, first taught me those rudiments, and to your kind auspices since, I owe all I have attained to in them; for your eminence in the republic of letters, so long iv established by your justly esteemed and learned pub= lications, is such, as few have equalled, and none have surpassed; your distinguished knowledge in the va= rious records of the History of this County, as well as of the diplomatique papers of the State, has justly entitled you, through his Majesty’s judicious choice, in preference to all others, to preside over the reposi= tories, where those archives are kept, which during the time you have been entrusted with them, you have filled to the universal benefit and satisfaction of every one.
    [Show full text]
  • Waste Management Guidance for Residents
    Kent County Council Waste Management Guide to household waste disposal Guidance document for residents September 2019 4 kent.gov.uk This document can be made available in other formats or languages. To request this, please email [email protected] or telephone 03000 421553 (text relay service 18001 03000 421553). This number goes to an answer machine, which is monitored during office hours. Or write to: Kent County Council, Diversity & Equality Team Room G37, Sessions House, County Hall, Maidstone, Kent, ME14 1XQ 2 Contents Responsibility for Waste Background Information 4 Roles of Authorities in Kent & Current Performance 5 Waste Segregation 6-17 Household Waste Recycling Centres 18-20 Conclusion 21 Waste Collection Authority Contacts 22 Quicklinks 23 Kent County Council Waste Management Mission Our Ambition is to deliver a high quality household waste disposal service, whilst remaining cost- effective for the people of Kent, with an emphasis on waste reduction, reuse, recycling and achieving zero landfill 3 Collection and disposal of waste Background Information Kent County Council (KCC) works in partnership with the Kent District and Borough Councils to find the best solution for the household waste that requires disposal. The aim of this document is to provide clear guidance to residents so they can dispose of their waste in a way that is in line with the Waste Hierarchy enabling waste to be reduced, reused or recycled where possible; and waste being sent for incineration or landfill is as minimal as possible. Prevention Most preferred Preparing for re-use Recycling Other recovery Disposal Least preferred 4 Roles of authorities in Kent District and Borough Councils are Waste Collection Authorities (WCAs) and they are responsible for collecting household waste from residents’ houses, referred to as kerbside collections.
    [Show full text]
  • FLATTER Bay Horse; Foaled 1999 Bold Reasoning Seattle Slew
    FLATTER Bay Horse; foaled 1999 Bold Reasoning Seattle Slew ................... My Charmer A.P. Indy ........................ Secretariat Weekend Surprise........... Lassie Dear FLATTER Raise a Native Mr. Prospector ................ Gold Digger Praise ............................ (1994) Northern Dancer Wild Applause ................ Glowing Tribute By A.P. INDY (1989). Horse of the year, classic winner of $2,979,815, Belmont S. [G1], etc. Leading sire twice, sire of 142 black-type winners, 11 champions, including Mineshaft [G1] ($2,283,402), Rags to Riches [G1] ($1,342,528), Bernardini [G1] ($3,060,480), and of Aptitude [G1] ($1,965,410), Stephen Got Even [G1] ($1,019,200), Pulpit [G1] ($728,200). 1st dam PRAISE, by Mr. Prospector. 2 wins at 3, $61,180. Dam of 6 foals, 4 winners-- CONGRATS (c. by A.P. Indy). 7 wins, 2 to 5, $818,960, in N.A./U.S., San Pasqual H. [G2] (SA, $90,000), Alysheba S. [L] (CD, $70,432), 2nd Santa Anita H. [G1] (SA, $200,000), Memorial Day H. [G3] (CRC, $20,000), Ack Ack H. [L] (HOL, $15,570), 3rd Hollywood Gold Cup H. [G1] (HOL, $90,000), Jim Dandy S. [G2] (SAR, $55,000), Washington Park H. [G2] (AP, $38,500), San Antonio H. [G2] (SA, $30,000). (Total: $998,960). Sire. Flatter (c. by A.P. Indy). Subject stallion. Fete (g. by Horse Chestnut (SAF)). 11 wins at 3 and 4, $310,208. Gigger (g. by Go for Gin). 4 wins, 2 to 6, $100,590. 2nd dam WILD APPLAUSE, by Northern Dancer. 5 wins in 10 starts at 2 and 3, $240,136, Diana H.-G2, Comely S.-G3, 2nd Test S.-G2, 3rd Mother Goose S.-G1.
    [Show full text]
  • Swale’S Coast
    The Kent Coast Coastal Access Report This document is part of a larger document produced by Kent Area of the Ramblers’ Association and should not be read or interpreted except as part of that larger document. In particular every part of the document should be read in conjunction with the notes in the Introduction. In no circumstances may any part of this document be downloaded or distributed without all the other parts. Swale’s Coast 4.4 Swale’s Coast 4.4.1 Description 4.4.1.1 Sw ale’s coast starts at TQ828671 at Otterham Quay. It extends for 115 km to TR056650 on Graveney Marshes to the w est of The Sportsman pub. It takes in the Isle of Sheppey w hich is connected to the mainland by tw o bridges at Sw ale. It is the longest coastline in Kent. 4.4.1.2 Approximately 55 km is on PRoWs, 27 km is de facto access (though some is difficult walking) and 33 km is inaccessible to w alkers. The majority of the 27 km of inaccessible coast does not appear to be excepted land. From the Coastal Access aspect it is the most complicated coastline in Kent. Part of the mainland route is along the Saxon Shore Way. 4.4.1.3 The view to seaw ard at the start is over the Medw ay estuary. There are extensive saltings and several uninhabited islands. The route then follows the River Sw ale to Sheppey and back to the Medw ay Estuary. The north and east coasts of Sheppey look out to the Thames Estuary.
    [Show full text]
  • Mid Kent Improvement Partnership Joint Scrutiny Task and Finish Group Report on Governance and Communication
    Mid Kent Improvement Partnership Joint Scrutiny Task and Finish Group report on governance and communication [revised at Special Meeting of Overview and Scrutiny Committee meeting held on 12 January 2015] Report date: 22 December 2014 [revised 12 January 2015] Task and Finish Group Councillor Andy Booth (Swale BC) Chairman: Task and Finish Group Councillors Fay Gooch and Paulina Stockell (Maidstone BC) Members: Councillor Mike Henderson (Swale BC) Councillors Bill Hills and Chris Woodward (Tunbridge Wells BC) O&S support officers: Poppy Brewer, Democratic Services Officer (Maidstone BC) Bob Pullen, Policy and Performance Officer (Swale BC) Holly Goring, Policy and Performance Manager (Tunbridge Wells BC) Service liaison Paul Taylor, Director (Mid Kent Services) officers: Jane Clarke, Programme Manager (Mid Kent Improvement Partnership) 1 Report summary 1.1 This report outlines the findings of the Joint Task and Finish Group (JTFG) which was established to review the governance and communication arrangements of the Mid Kent Improvement Partnership. 1 2 List of recommendations 2.1 The Task and Finish Group recommends: That the Overview and Scrutiny Committees for Maidstone Borough Council, Swale Borough Council and Tunbridge Wells Borough Council each request that their individual Cabinets should jointly consider and respond to the following recommendations that have arisen from the joint scrutiny of governance and communications: MKIP Governance a) that opportunities for pre-scrutiny should be provided within existing governance arrangements
    [Show full text]
  • 10 Area 3.Cdr
    Area 3: Wormshill to Area 3: Wormshill to Landscape Character Areas Landscape Character Areas Otterden North Downs Otterden North Downs Area: From west of the Physical Influence Key Characteristics: A249 to the eastern The chalk landform is very dominant here, with an exhilarating, large-scale boundary of the Borough, character that is reinforced by the medium to large-scale field pattern. The 2 including Bicknor, topography is dramatically undulating, except in the vicinity of Bicknor, with , high, rolling chalk downland Wormshill and Frinstead; extensive views both north and south. The cruciform war memorial, carved dominates; northwards from into the chalk above Lenham, is visible over an extensive area. Harrietsham to the , less extensive dip slope; Borough boundary. , Historical and Cultural Influences wide arable fields contained Although there are few settlements of any size, hamlets such as Otterden by dense woodland belts; have Old English place names (Otter's people rather than to do with otters) , network of small, often and are long established, unlike the central part of the North Downs dip sunken, narrow lanes; Area 3 slope. Wormshill means 'Woden's Hill', dedicated to the chief of the , Teutonic gods. This variant dates from the 13th century. occasional dramatic extensive views over the 5 Low Weald. 4 6 7 Scale Bar 5 Chestnut coppice with oak standards 0 1 2 4 8 km Torry Hill Park lies 1¼ miles east of Frinstead village. This private family home, a copy of the original Georgian building, lies within a 930ha/2,300 Landscape Character acre estate with extensive mid-19th century parkland and 4ha of largely This continuation of the North Downs dipslope is characterised by the very undulating topography, with a very small 20th century garden.
    [Show full text]
  • News Release ______
    News Release _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Contact: Kevin Kerstein Publicity Manager Churchill Downs Racetrack (610) 420-6971 (mobile) (502) 635-4712 (office) [email protected] ‘WE’VE FOUND OUR WAY HOME’: HARDIN BROTHERS BRING PASSION OF HORSE RACING TO CHURCHILL DOWNS STABLE GATE LOUISVILLE, KY (Sunday, May 23, 2021) – Donnie and Ken Hardin are hard to miss when backside employees enter the Churchill Downs Stable Gate each morning. The brothers, who work on the security team, bring their passion of horse racing and the spirit of their father with them to each shift at Churchill Downs. “Churchill Downs stands for everything I love,” Ken simply stated. The Hardin’s faces light up every time a new horse racing star enters the stable gate or when they get the opportunity to tell a story about horses that strike up memories of their father. The Stable Gate office is filled with horse racing memorabilia and different photos where all of the employees, not just the Hardins, can share personal stories. One specific photo of Churchill Downs’ all-time leading jockey Pat Day brings back memories of the Hardins’ late father, Charles, every time they enter the office. “I was about 14-years-old when Pat Day won the (1992) Kentucky Derby (aboard Lil E Tee) but I remember it well,” Donnie said. “My dad was taken back by the legendary jockey’s humble demeanor after his big accomplishment. I learned a lot from that. “The next spring Churchill Downs had an autograph session featuring Pat Day. At the time, I collected sports trading cards, including jockey cards.
    [Show full text]
  • ALL the PRETTY HORSES.Hwp
    ALL THE PRETTY HORSES Cormac McCarthy Volume One The Border Trilogy Vintage International• Vintage Books A Division of Random House, Inc. • New York I THE CANDLEFLAME and the image of the candleflame caught in the pierglass twisted and righted when he entered the hall and again when he shut the door. He took off his hat and came slowly forward. The floorboards creaked under his boots. In his black suit he stood in the dark glass where the lilies leaned so palely from their waisted cutglass vase. Along the cold hallway behind him hung the portraits of forebears only dimly known to him all framed in glass and dimly lit above the narrow wainscotting. He looked down at the guttered candlestub. He pressed his thumbprint in the warm wax pooled on the oak veneer. Lastly he looked at the face so caved and drawn among the folds of funeral cloth, the yellowed moustache, the eyelids paper thin. That was not sleeping. That was not sleeping. It was dark outside and cold and no wind. In the distance a calf bawled. He stood with his hat in his hand. You never combed your hair that way in your life, he said. Inside the house there was no sound save the ticking of the mantel clock in the front room. He went out and shut the door. Dark and cold and no wind and a thin gray reef beginning along the eastern rim of the world. He walked out on the prairie and stood holding his hat like some supplicant to the darkness over them all and he stood there for a long time.
    [Show full text]