Health Care Systems in Eight Countries: Trends and Challenges

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Health Care Systems in Eight Countries: Trends and Challenges Health care systems in eight countries: trends and challenges PREPARED BY THE European Observatory on Health Care Systems April 2002 Health care systems in eight countries: trends and challenges Commissioned by the Health Trends Review, HM Treasury Prepared by the European Observatory on Health Care Systems April 2002 The European Observatory on Health Care Systems is a unique project that builds on the commitment of all its partners to improving health care systems: S The World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe S Government of Greece S Government of Norway S Government of Spain S European Investment Bank S Open Society Institute S World Bank S London School of Economics and Political Science S London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine Health care systems in eight countries: trends and challenges Editors: Anna Dixon Elias Mossialos Authors: Reinhard Busse Anna Dixon Judith Healy Allan Krasnik Sandra Leon Valérie Paris Dominique Polton Ana Rico Ray Robinson Simone Sandier Sarah Thomson Signild Vallgårda Karsten Vrangbæk The European Observatory on Health Care Systems London School of Economics & Political Science Hub Houghton Street London WC2A 2AE UK First published 2002. © The London School of Economics & Political Science 2002 The views expressed in this publication are those of the editors and contributors and do not necessarily represent the decisions or the stated policy of the participating organisations of the European Observatory on Health Care Systems. All rights reserved. Except for the quotation of short passages for the purposes of criticism and review, no part of this publication may be reprinted, reproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any other information storage or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of the copyright holder. A catalogue record for this publication is available from the British Library. ISBN 0 7530 1548 X Table of Contents Introduction 1 Australia 3 Denmark 17 France 31 Germany 47 The Netherlands 61 New Zealand 75 Sweden 91 The United Kingdom 103 Appendix 115 Glossary 122 i List of Tables Table 1.1 Main sources of health care funding in Australia, as a percentage of total expenditure, 1979/1980–1999/2000 Table 1.2 Trends in health care expenditure in Australia, 1970–2000 Table 1.3 Government and non-government expenditure as a percentage of total expenditure on health services, 1985/1986 to 1999/2000 (current prices, per cent) Table 1.4 Inpatient utilisation and performance in Australia, 1970–1997 Table 2.1 Main sources of funding for county and municipal expenditure in Denmark, in billion DKK and as a percentage of total, 2001 Table 2.2 Main sources of health care funding in Denmark, as percentage of total and percentage of GDP, 1999 Table 2.3 Health care expenditure by type of service in Denmark, current prices in million DKK, 1980-1999 Table 2.4 Summary of key reforms in Denmark, recent years Table 3.1 Level of complementary VHI coverage in France, as a percentage of total, 2000 Table 3.2 Social health insurance contributions in France Table 3.3 Market share of the three types of insurer offering complementary VHI in France (CMU excluded) Table 3.4 Main sources of health care funding in France, in million EUR and as a percentage of total, 2000 Table 3.5 Health care expenditure by type of service in France, million EUR and as a percentage of total, 2000 Table 3.6 Health care personnel France, 2000 Table 4.1 Trends in health care expenditure in Germany, 1992–1998 Table 4.2 Main sources of health care funding in Germany, as a percentage of total, 1992 and 1998 Table 4.3 Health care expenditure by type of service and provider in Germany, as a percentage of total, 1992 and 1998 Table 4.4 Structure and utilisation data on general and psychiatric hospitals in western and eastern parts of Germany, 1991–1998 Table 4.5 Ownership of German general hospitals, 1990-1999 Table 4.6 Proportion of patients reporting problems with hospital care, in Germany, Sweden, Switzerland, UK and US, 1998-2000 Table 5.1 The changing mix of payments to sickness funds in the Netherlands, 1992-1999 Table 5.2 Trends in health care expenditure in the Netherlands, 1980-2000 Table 5.3 Main sources of health care funding in the Netherlands, as a percentage of total, 1980-1999 Table 5.4 Health care expenditure by type of service in the Netherlands, in 1000 million NLG and as a percentage of total, 1990-2000 Table 5.5 Inpatient utilisation and performance in the Netherlands, 1980-1998 ii Table 6.1 Main sources of health care funding in New Zealand as a percentage of total, 1980- 1999 Table 6.2 Health care expenditure, Consumer Price Index (CPI) deflated trends Table 6.3 Health care expenditure by type of service, as percentage of total expenditure on health, 1990-97 Table 6.4 Health care personnel in New Zealand, per 1000 population, 1990, 1995 and 2000 Table 7.1 Cost of prescribed drugs and associated coinsurance rates in Sweden Table 7.2 Trends in health care expenditure in Sweden, 1980-1998 Table 7.3 Length of wait for consultation and length of consultation in primary care in Spain, Finland, Portugal and Sweden, 1997 Table 8.1 Trends in health care expenditure in the United Kingdom, 1980-1999 Table 8.2 Main sources of health care funding in the United Kingdom, as percentage of total expenditure, 1980-1999 Table A1 Expenditure on health in selected countries, 1988 and 1999 or latest available year (LAY) Table A2. Expenditure on health by source of funding in selected countries (percentage of total expenditure on health) 1999 or latest available year Table A3. At a glance: important characteristics of health care systems in selected countries relating to financing, 2000 (unless noted) Table A4. User charges for different health care services in selected countries, 2001 unless specified iii List of contributors Reinhard Busse is Professor and Director of the Department for Health Care Management at the Technical University Berlin and Associate Research Director of the European Observatory on Health Care Systems. Anna Dixon is Lecturer in European Health Policy in the Department of Social Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science and Research Associate with the European Observatory on Health Care Systems. Judith Healy Formerly Senior Research Fellow, European Observatory on Health Care Systems, based at the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine. Currently Visiting Fellow at the National Centre for Epidemiology & Population Health, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia. Allan Krasnik is Professor at the Institute of Public Health, University of Copenhagen Sandra Leon is Research Assistant at the European Observatory on Health Care Systems, Madrid Hub Elias Mossialos is Brian Abel-Smith Reader in Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science and Research Director of the European Observatory on Health Care Systems Valérie Paris is Researcher at the Centre de recherche, d'études et de documentaton en économie de la santé (CREDES), Paris Dominique Polton is Director of the Centre de recherche, d'études et de documentaton en économie de la santé (CREDES), Paris Ana Rico is Research Fellow at European Observatory on Health Care Systems, Madrid Hub Ray Robinson is Professor of Health Policy, LSE Health and Social Care, London School of Economics and Political Science Simone Sandier is Research Director of Arguments Socio-Economiques pour la Santé, Paris. Sarah Thomson is Research Associate in Health Policy at LSE Health and Social Care, London School of Economics and Political Science and Research Officer with the European Observatory on Health Care Systems. Signild Vallgårda is Associate Professor at the Institute of Public Health, University of Copenhagen Karsten Vrangbæk is Assistant Professor at the Institute of Public Health and Institute of Political Science, University of Copenhagen iv Acknowledgements The editors would like to thank Anna Maresso for her editorial assistance and Demetra Nicolaou for administrative assistance. The production of this report would not have been possible without the work already undertaken for the European Observatory on Health Care Systems by the authors of the Health Care Systems in Transition series. v Abbreviations Monetary values are generally given in national currency units. The abbreviations used in the text and the current exchange rates (GBP1= at 1st January 2002) are listed here for reference. Australia AUD Australian dollar 2.85 Denmark DKK Danish krone 12.13 France EUR euro 1.63 Germany EUR euro 1.63 (DEM German mark 3.20) The Netherlands EUR euro 1.63 (NLG Dutch guilder 3.60) New Zealand NZD New Zealand dollar 3.50 Sweden SEK Swedish krona 15.20 UK GBP British pound 1.00 USA USD American dollar 1.45 vi INTRODUCTION In March 2001, the Chancellor of the Exchequer asked Derek Wanless to undertake a review of the drivers of health care expenditure in the United Kingdom and their likely impact on the resources required for the health service over the next 20 years. In deliberating the appropriate response to these pressures it is useful to see how countries outside the United Kingdom are addressing these challenges. This report, commissioned by the Health Trends Review at HM Treasury, aims to provide up-to-date information on the health care systems of seven countries outside the UK. It also includes a report on the UK health care system as a point of comparison. The report has been compiled by the European Observatory on Health Care Systems. The Observatory is a project that builds on the commitment of all its partners to improving health care systems. The material used in compiling this report draws heavily on the Observatory’s Health Care Systems in Transition profiles for the relevant countries.
Recommended publications
  • Group Work: Ghana's Pathway to Achieve Universal Health Coverage
    Health Care Financing module, 6-15 November 2019 Group work: Ghana’s pathway to achieve universal health coverage Reinhard Busse* Peter Agyei Bafour** * Department of Health Care Management (WHO Collaborating Centre for Health Systems Research and Management), Technische Universität Berlin, Germany & European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies ** School of Public Health, KNUST, Kumasi, Ghana Group Work First 90 min (8:00-10:00): • Same groups as on Friday • 90 minutes group work – Discuss Ghana‘s pathway to UHC Second 90 min (10:30-12:30): • Present Ghanas pathway to UHC – 10 min presentation per group + 5 min discussion – 15 min general discussion and wrap-up 12 November 2019 Group work: pathways to UHC 2 Group task 1. Identify the most important challenges for the Ghana health system to reach UHC 2. Discuss the content of the lectures of the first week: what options are available to achieve UHC? And how can they be implemented (revenue generation, actors, functions, financial flow)? 3. Prepare a presentation (max. 10 slides): – Main challenges for UHC in Ghana: <3 slides – Options to achieve UHC: 2-3 slides – A pathway to achieve UHC: 3-4 slides – Conclusions: 1 slide 12 November 2019 Group work: pathways to UHC 3 The Ghana health system at a glance Collector of resources Third-party payer MoF MoH Development partners NHIA NHIA 2.5% of VAT (NHI levy), Contracts with formal sector: 2.5% SNIT accredited providers contribution, Small premiums (€1-7) MoH Population Provider NHIS members: 35-40% Choice of contracted providers 57% government (GHS), Uninsured (majority) 33% private, Out-of-pocket payments VHI (few) 7% non-for-profit 11 November 2019 From fragmented systems to UHC (CHAG, Muslim)4 NHIS revenue composition 11 November 2019 From fragmented systems to UHC 5 NHIS membership composition 11 November 2019 From fragmented systems to UHC 6 Road to UHC in Ghana – targets for 2030 11 November 2019 From fragmented systems to UHC 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Health Care Systems in the Eu a Comparative Study
    EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT DIRECTORATE GENERAL FOR RESEARCH WORKING PAPER HEALTH CARE SYSTEMS IN THE EU A COMPARATIVE STUDY Public Health and Consumer Protection Series SACO 101 EN This publication is available in the following languages: EN (original) DE FR The opinions expressed in this document are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily represent the official position of the European Parliament. Reproduction and translation for non-commercial purposes are authorized, provided the source is acknowledged and the publisher is given prior notice and sent a copy. Publisher: EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT L-2929 LUXEMBOURG Author: Dr.med. Elke Jakubowski, MSc. HPPF, Advisor in Public Health Policy Department of Epidemiology and Social Medicine, Medical School Hannover Co-author: Dr.med. Reinhard Busse, M.P.H., Department of Epidemiology and Social Medicine, Medical School Hannover Editor: Graham R. Chambers BA Directorate-General for Research Division for Policies on Social Affairs, Women, Health and Culture Tel.: (00 352) 4300-23957 Fax: (00 352) 4300-27720 e-mail: [email protected] WITH SPECIAL GRATITUDE TO: James Kahan, Panos Kanavos, Julio Bastida-Lopez, Elias Mossialos, Miriam Wiley, Franco Sassi, Tore Schersten, Juha Teperi for their helpful comments and reviews of earlier drafts of the country chapters, and Manfred Huber for additional explanatory remarks on OECD Health Data. The manuscript was completed in May 1998. EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT DIRECTORATE GENERAL FOR RESEARCH WORKING PAPER HEALTH CARE SYSTEMS IN THE EU A COMPARATIVE STUDY Public Health and Consumer Protection Series SACO 101 EN 11-1998 Health Care Systems CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ........................................................... 5 PART ONE: A Comparative Outline of the Health Care Systems of the EU Member States ........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Improving Healthcare Quality in Europe
    Cover_WHO_nr52.qxp_Mise en page 1 20/08/2019 16:31 Page 1 51 THE ROLE OF PUBLIC HEALTH ORGANIZATIONS IN ADDRESSING PUBLIC HEALTH PROBLEMS IN EUROPE PUBLIC HEALTH IN ADDRESSING ORGANIZATIONS PUBLIC HEALTH THE ROLE OF Quality improvement initiatives take many forms, from the creation of standards for health Improving healthcare 53 professionals, health technologies and health facilities, to audit and feedback, and from fostering a patient safety culture to public reporting and paying for quality. For policy- makers who struggle to decide which initiatives to prioritise for investment, understanding quality in Europe Series the potential of different quality strategies in their unique settings is key. This volume, developed by the Observatory together with OECD, provides an overall conceptual Health Policy Health Policy framework for understanding and applying strategies aimed at improving quality of care. Characteristics, effectiveness and Crucially, it summarizes available evidence on different quality strategies and provides implementation of different strategies recommendations for their implementation. This book is intended to help policy-makers to understand concepts of quality and to support them to evaluate single strategies and combinations of strategies. Edited by Quality of care is a political priority and an important contributor to population health. This Reinhard Busse book acknowledges that "quality of care" is a broadly defined concept, and that it is often Niek Klazinga unclear how quality improvement strategies fit within a health system, and what their particular contribution can be. This volume elucidates the concepts behind multiple elements Dimitra Panteli of quality in healthcare policy (including definitions of quality, its dimensions, related activities, Wilm Quentin and targets), quality measurement and governance and situates it all in the wider context of health systems research.
    [Show full text]
  • SPEAKER BIOGRAPHIES “Lessons on Coverage from Abroad: How Do the Dutch, German and Swiss Health Care Systems Do It?” November 14, 2008
    SPEAKER BIOGRAPHIES “Lessons on Coverage from Abroad: How do the Dutch, German and Swiss Health Care Systems Do it?” November 14, 2008 REINHARD BUSSE, DR. MED., MPH, FFPH, is professor and department head for health care management at the Berlin University of Technology, Germany, where he is also dean of the faculty of economics and management. His research focuses on both methods and contents of comparative health system analysis, with a particular emphasis on reforms in Germany, other social health insurance countries and central and eastern Europe, and the role of EU. His health services research includes cost-effectiveness analyses, health targets and health technology assessment. He is also a faculty member of Charité, associate head of Research Policy and Head of the Berlin hub of the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, and is a member of several scientific advisory boards (e.g. for the Federal Association of Company-based Sickness Funds, the German Agency for Health Technology Assessment and the Federal Physicians’ Chamber). Dr. Busse is a regular consultant for the EU Commission, the World Bank, OECD and other international organizations within Europe and beyond, including the World Health Organization. Dr. Busse’s department is a WHO Collaborating Center for Health System Research and Management. He was the scientific director of two EU-funded projects (HealthBASKET, HealthACCESS) which compared the benefit baskets, costs of individual health services and access to health services in EU countries. Dr. Busse studied medicine in Marburg, Germany; Boston; and London, and studied public health in Hannover, Germany. ROBERT LEU, PHD, is head of the Department of Economics at the University of Bern, Switzerland.
    [Show full text]
  • A Universal European Health System for California: the German Model by Micah Weinberg, Phd and Alice Bishop
    March 2019 A Universal European Health System for California: The German Model BY MICAH WEINBERG, PHD AND ALICE BISHOP As the Affordable Care Act’s future continues to hang Achieving Universal Coverage in the balance, the idea of implementing some form of universal healthcare system in California or nationwide and Health Equity has become increasingly popular. Much of this discus- A System That Preserves Choice and sion has focused on the desirability and feasibility of Controls Costs adopting a Canadian-style single-payer or “Medicare for All” system. While Canada is a worthwhile case study to Adopting a Universal European Health System model examine, there are other models for a universal health- would allow California to strike a successful balance be- care system that may make more sense for California tween the competing goals of securing access, control- and the U.S., achieve better outcomes, and have a more ling cost, and improving quality. The elements of such a feasible path to implementation. system include: One such example is a “Universal European Health • Not-for-Profit Health: If enacted, such a system System,” inspired by the Bismarck model, most clearly would have one single insurance market for most exemplified by Germany. This report lays out what such people. As in the German system, residents would a model could look like if implemented in California. obtain coverage from competing wellness funds. While this report focuses specifically on the German Unlike in California’s current marketplace, however, system, several other countries use elements of the all insurers would be nonprofit, though an external Bismarck model, including France, Belgium, the Nether- market with for-profit plans may persist.
    [Show full text]
  • Compulsory Social Health Insurance Contributions
    39913 HNP DISCUSSION PAPER Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Analyzing Changes in Health Financing Arrangements in High-Income Countries Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized A Comprehensive Framework Approach About this series... This series is produced by the Health, Nutrition, and Population Family (HNP) of the World Bank’s Human Development Network. The papers in this series aim to provide a vehicle for publishing preliminary and unpolished results on HNP topics to encourage discussion and debate. Reinhard Busse, Jonas Schreyögg, and Christian Gericke The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this paper are entirely those of the author(s) and should not be attributed in any manner to the World Bank, to its affiliated organizations or to members of its Board of Executive Directors or the countries they represent. Citation and the use of material presented in this series should take into account this provisional character. For free copies of papers in this series please contact the individual authors whose name appears on the paper. Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Enquiries about the series and submissions should be made directly to the Managing Editor Janet Nassim ([email protected]) or HNP Advisory Service ([email protected], tel 202 473-2256, fax 202 522-3234). For more information, see also www.worldbank.org/ hnppublications. THE WORLD BANK Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized 1818 H Street, NW Washington, DC USA 20433 Telephone: 202 473 1000 Facsimile: 202 477 6391 Internet: www.worldbank.org E-mail: [email protected] February 2007 Analyzing Changes in Health Financing Arrangements in High-Income Countries A Comprehensive Framework Approach Reinhard Busse, Jonas Schreyögg, and Christian Gericke February 2007 Health, Nutrition and Population (HNP) Discussion Paper This series is produced by the Health, Nutrition, and Population Family (HNP) of the World Bank's Human Development Network.
    [Show full text]
  • Achieving Sustainability and Scale-Up of Mobile Health Noncommunicable Disease Interventions in Sub-Saharan Africa: Views of Policy Makers in Ghana
    JMIR MHEALTH AND UHEALTH Opoku et al Original Paper Achieving Sustainability and Scale-Up of Mobile Health Noncommunicable Disease Interventions in Sub-Saharan Africa: Views of Policy Makers in Ghana Daniel Opoku, MScPH; Reinhard Busse, MD, MPH; Wilm Quentin, PD, MD, MSc HPPF Faculty VII Economics and Management, Institute of Technology and Management, Department of Health Care Management, Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany Corresponding Author: Daniel Opoku, MScPH Faculty VII Economics and Management Institute of Technology and Management Department of Health Care Management Technische Universität Berlin Straûe des 17. Juni 135 Administrative office H80 Berlin, 10623 Germany Phone: 49 3031429222 Fax: 49 30 314 28433 Email: [email protected] Abstract Background: A growing body of evidence shows that mobile health (mHealth) interventions may improve treatment and care for the rapidly rising number of patients with noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). A recent realist review developed a framework highlighting the influence of context factors, including predisposing characteristics, needs, and enabling resources (PNE), for the long-term success of mHealth interventions. The views of policy makers will ultimately determine implementation and scale-up of mHealth interventions in SSA. However, their views about necessary conditions for sustainability and scale-up remain unexplored. Objective: This study aimed to understand the views of policy makers in Ghana with regard to the most important factors for successful implementation, sustainability, and scale-up of mHealth NCD interventions. Methods: Members of the technical working group responsible for Ghana's national NCD policy were interviewed about their knowledge of and attitude toward mHealth and about the most important factors contributing to long-term intervention success.
    [Show full text]
  • Diagnosis Related Groups in Europe
    Diagnosis Related Groups…pb24.5_Diagnosis Related Groups…pb24.5 23/10/2011 11:32 Page 1 European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies Series Diagnosis-Related Groups in Europe Diagnosis-Related Groups Moving towards transparency, efficiency and quality in hospitals Diagnosis-Related Group (DRG) systems were introduced in Europe to increase the transparency of services provided by hospitals and to incentivize greater efficiency in the use of resources invested in acute hospitals. In many countries, these systems were also designed to contribute to improving – or at least protecting – the quality of care. After more than a decade of experience with using DRGs in Europe, this book considers whether the extensive use of DRGs has contributed towards achieving these objectives. Diagnosis-Related Written by authors with extensive experience of these systems, this book is a product of the EuroDRG project and constitutes an important resource for health Groups in Europe policy-makers and researchers from Europe and beyond. The book is intended in to contribute to the emergence of a ‘common language’ that will facilitate communication between researchers and policy-makers interested in Europe improving the functioning and resourcing of the acute hospital sector. The book Moving towards transparency, efficiency includes: and quality in hospitals • A clearly structured introduction to the main ‘building blocks’ of DRG systems Busse, Geissler, Quentin and Wiley • An overview of key issues related to DRGs including their impact on efficiency,
    [Show full text]
  • HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT and HEALTH POLICY-MAKING in EUROPE Current Status, Challenges and Potential
    European on Health Systems and Policies HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT AND HEALTH POLICY-MAKING IN EUROPE Current status, challenges and potential Marcial Velasco Garrido Finn Børlum Kristensen Camilla Palmhøj Nielsen Reinhard Busse Observatory Studies Series No 14 Health Technology Assessment and Health Policy-Making in Europe The European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies supports and promotes evidence- based health policy-making through comprehensive and rigorous analysis of health systems in Europe. It brings together a wide range of policy-makers, academics and practitioners to analyse trends in health reform, drawing on experience from across Europe to illuminate policy issues. The European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies is a partnership between the World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, the Governments of Belgium, Finland, Greece, Norway, Slovenia, Spain and Sweden, the Veneto Region of Italy, the European Investment Bank, the Open Society Institute, the World Bank, the London School of Economics and Political Science and the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine. Health Technology Assessment and Health Policy-Making in Europe Current status, challenges and potential The European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies supports and promotes evidence- based health policy-making through comprehensive and rigorous analysis of health systems in Marcial Velasco Garrido, Finn Børlum Kristensen, Europe. It brings together a wide range of policy-makers, academics and practitioners to analyse
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction and Frameworks
    Introduction and frameworks Reinhard Busse, Prof. Dr. med. MPH FFPH FG Management im Gesundheitswesen, Technische Universität Berlin (WHO Collaborating Centre for Health Systems Research and Management) & European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies 21 November 2017 Introduction and frameworks 1 Outline of the course- Week 1 Topic Date Lecturer Introduction and Outline of the course 20.11.2017 Wilm Quentin and Daniel Opoku 15-17 Uhr Introduction and frameworks 21.11.2017 Reinhard Busse 09-12 Uhr Financing I: Raising Resources 13.30-17 Uhr Wilm Quentin Seminar on health system relevant 22.11.2017 Anne Spranger databases and information for term paper 10-12 Uhr (H8173/74) Financing II: Pooling and re-allocation 13.30-17 Uhr Reinhard Busse Financing III: Purchasing and payment 23.11.2017 Wilm Quentin systems 09-12 Uhr Leadership and Governance + Care 13.30-17 Uhr Reinhard Busse Delivery Workforce 24.11.2017 Claudia Maier 9-10.30 Uhr Introduction to group exercise 10.30-12 Uhr Anne Spranger Medical products 13.30-17 Uhr Reinhard Busse 21 November 2017 Introduction and frameworks 2 Outline of the course - Week 2 Topic Date Lecturer Preliminary Summary of building blocks 27.11.2017 Reinhard Busse 09-10.30 Uhr Presentation by GIZ on health system 10.30-12 Uhr Ursula Bürger, Fachplanerin related German development cooperation Kompetenz-Center Gesundheit und Soziale Sicherung, GIZ Access and Coverage 13.30-17 Uhr Reinhard Busse Quality and Safety 28.11.2017 Reinhard Busse 09-12 Uhr Financial and social risk protection 13.30-17 Uhr Wilm
    [Show full text]
  • What Do Core Obligations Under the Right to Health Bring to Universal
    HHr Health and Human Rights Journal What Do Core Obligations under the Right to HealthHHR_final_logo_alone.indd 1 10/19/15 10:53 AM Bring to Universal Health Coverage? lisa forman, claudia beiersmann, claire e. brolan, martin mckee, rachel hammonds, and gorik ooms Abstract Can the right to health, and particularly the core obligations of states specified under this right, assist in formulating and implementing universal health coverage (UHC), now included in the post-2015 Sustainable Development Goals? In this paper, we examine how core obligations under the right to health could lead to a version of UHC that is likely to advance equity and rights. We first address the affinity between the right to health and UHC as evinced through changing definitions of UHC and the health domains that UHC explicitly covers. We then engage with relevant interpretations of the right to health, including core obligations. We turn to analyze what core obligations might bring to UHC, particularly in defining what and who is covered. Finally, we acknowledge some of the risks associated with both UHC and core obligations and consider potential avenues for mitigating these risks. lisa forman is Canada Research Chair in Human Rights and Global Health Equity, and Assistant Professor at the Dalla Lana School of Public Health at the University of Toronto, Canada. claudia beiersmann is a researcher in the working group “Global Health Policies and Systems” at the Institute of Public Health, Heidelberg University, Germany. claire e. brolan is a postdoctoral fellow at the Dalla Lana School of Public Health at the University of Toronto and research fellow at the School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University of Queensland, Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • Regulating Quality and Safety of Health and Social Care International Experiences
    CHILDREN AND FAMILIES The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and EDUCATION AND THE ARTS decisionmaking through research and analysis. ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE This electronic document was made available from www.rand.org as a public INFRASTRUCTURE AND service of the RAND Corporation. TRANSPORTATION INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS LAW AND BUSINESS NATIONAL SECURITY Skip all front matter: Jump to Page 16 POPULATION AND AGING PUBLIC SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY Support RAND TERRORISM AND Browse Reports & Bookstore HOMELAND SECURITY Make a charitable contribution For More Information Visit RAND at www.rand.org Explore RAND Europe View document details Limited Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law as indicated in a notice appearing later in this work. This electronic representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for non-commercial use only. Unauthorized posting of RAND electronic documents to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND electronic documents are protected under copyright law. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of our research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please see RAND Permissions. This report is part of the RAND Corporation research report series. RAND reports present research findings and objective analysis that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND reports undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity. EUROPE Regulating quality and safety of health and social care International experiences Daniel Schweppenstedde, Saba Hinrichs, Uzor C. Ogbu, Eric C.
    [Show full text]