DOCSLIB.ORG

The Chronicle

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Chronicle the DUKE'S DAILY NEWSPAPER chronicle Volume 69, Number 132 Durham, North Carolina Tuesday, April 16, 1974 Innovative living plan recommended by RLC By Larry Toppman improve it. to warrant such a move. If ID its penultimate Artley said that he had interest were lacking, meeting of the year, the originally presented the Mueller thought, "The Residential Life Committee roposal to ASDU in people from Durham would (RLC) decided yesterday to January 1973, but that they have to be moved in for the recommend the most 'expressed interest without sake of revenue, and the startling and innovative taking any action." Artley domain of the campus proposal it has received this then went to Chancellor would be disrupted." year. John Blackburn, who was . Artley argued in turn The proposal, submitted enthusiastic about the plan, that, unless a plan such as by John Artley, professor of especially for its ability to ,his were instituted (his electrical engineering, called provide relief to the chronic community is ecologically for the establishment of a problem of dorm feasible, and he has agreed living-learning community overcrowding. to file an environmental which would encompass the Artley, a faculty member statement before needs of Duke of the RLC, said he had (Continued on page 9) Enjoying a Sunday in the gardens. {Photo by Gary Reimer) undergraduates, graduate brought the plan before the students, faculty members, committee "to bring it to and Durham residents. the University's attention The objectives of such a right now. We have to make Health services insufficient, village, according to Artley, the University aware of this would be to "provide an option, while going to alternative educational Blackburn with a bunch of experience and give a interested people." shortcomings plague students heterogeneous group of The RLC received nmitted people the Artley's idea favorably, but By Sally Donnell He also said it was a problem that someone. opporturnity to live questioned him at length The inconvenience of waiting for students must seek their own outside Jackson, a Trinity College junior together." about the details of his plan. doctors for long periods of time and referrals for care that cannot be was asked to speak about comments According to Artley's Student member Nancy the charge for elective gynecological provided by the center, and that they and complaints received by the plan, some of the land Nies started the services are the objects of the most must pay private fees for these Student Health Advisory Board. between East and West interrogation by asking how frequent complaints at student medical services. "There are practically nil comments campuses would be many undergraduates would health, according to two sources. Fund curtailments to the committee," said Jackson. developed into a "model live . in the community, In interviews yesterday Craig Nowlin said this is the result of Complaints, too, have been few, he neighborhood" housing Artley replied that "it wil! Jakson of the Student Health fund curtailments and "in the past said. approximately 100 people, all depend on the type of Advisory Board and Dr. John Nowlin, the University was generous in taking 'Tt's very discouraging." Jackson a fuU Ume staff The village would contain people who live there, but I member, expounded care of student health problems." said, when there are complaints, the recreational facilities, a imagine about 10 percent of on the various problems, Nowlin said "there should be an students complaining are reluctant to community house, them will be undergrad- Nowling spoke of his perception of equitable way to take care of this." press investigation into the problem, these and other problems with individual residences, uate." As alternatives he mentioned although investigation can be student health. In addition to the 45 classrooms, and a research Another student, Curt raising student health fees or higher undertaken by any member of the facility that would study Mueller, asked Artley minute to two hour wait, he said the insurance rates. Now, said Nowlin, extensive paper work, although advisory board. the community itself and whether or not there was insurance is only obtainable after the Speaking of problms he sees with necessary, should be trimmed down. first two or three visits, which are also recommend ways to enough interest at present student health, Jackson also the most expensive visits. mentioned the long waiting period as "Students have a right to the care the most frequently complained Students seek funds they need," said Nowlin. about aspect of student health. Another problem mentioned by Gynecological services Nowlin is the charge for elective gynecological services. He said these Jackson also said there are Charitable drive begun services should be offered free. "If I complaints about the charges for had the money I would take care of gynecological services. He said he By Jenny Whitman Inc., approximately one-quarter was spent on wanted to stress however, that there This week Duke students opened a drive to researc, another on patient services, and the this," he said. He said this issue is one of his top priorities. are two points to be recognized about raise $3,000 for Muscular Dystrophy, Inc., remaining half on community services, public this issue. soliciting funds both on campus and in the health education, professional training and He said student health did submit While elective examinations are Durham community. supporting services. MD, Inc. operates 127 free a request to the University for free charged, acute gynecological care is "The response thus far has been good," clinics in the United States, Guam, and Puerto gynecological services but was turned free, a fact which Jackson said he according to Jim Tompert, co-chairman of Rico. down. feels is not known to many students. Muscular Dystrophy's National Youth The fund raising undertaking is the first of Understaffed He said he feels that free elective care Committee, its kind in the history of the University, Nowlin also said he feels student is "a luxury we cannot afford." Many groups have already organized fund Tompert said. health is understaffed, and could use raising activities. The group which raises the Any student or group wishing to participate one more full time staff member. He Jackson said the board voted most money will receive three free kegs of in any aspectof the drive should contact Jim said they do have thy money, unanimously not to submit a proposal beer, according to Tompert. Tompert at x3573. however, and are looking for for free elective gynecological care to Businesses and citizens in Durham are being the University administration. asked to contribute. An ad hoc committee, the In regard to the long wait problem, Concerned Duke Students for Muscular Jackson said he does not think it Dystrophy, is organizing Duke's participation would be efficient to have more in the drive. doctors. He said it is only during Examples of various projects to raise "epidemics" that students must wait money on campus include a bike marathon by very long periods of time and at other Phi Kappa Alpha, coordinator, Robert Henderson; a jogathon by Sigma Alpha times the doctors would be "sitting •Epsilon, coordinator, Jeff Smith; a road aroud waiting for students." blockade by Theta Chi, coordinator, Robert 'More efficient Messe; an auction of kegs of beer by Alpha Tau Omega, coordinator, Skip Reese; a bake Jackson said it is more efficient sale by Kappa Kappa Gamma, coordinator, [economically] for students to wait. Libby Montgomery; and a car wash by Circle He said the problem can be changed if K, coordinator, Mary Sampson. students feel the wait is too demanding on their time, "but it will Muscular dystrophy is a disease that affects cost." the voluntary musdes of the body. Two thirds of the 200,000 afflicted victims each year are Jackson said he would like to see children between the ages of three and 13. better communication between the The most prominent characteristic of the advisory board and students. He said disease is the progressive degeneration of the the board hopes to hold open muscles, which unless treated early in meetings in the fall for students to development, leads to death. come and express their opinions on Of last year's $16 million budget for MD, Student health building on Erwin Road. (Photo by Dan Moses) student health. Page Two The Chronicle Tuesday, April 16, 1974 SPECTRUMi TODAY POLITICAL SCIENCE ARTISTS: Don't forget to CHAPEL ATTENDANT — The Fall meeting of the ATTENTION: APRIL, 1974 MAJORS: Due to the lack of turn in exhibits (photos, Students who are eligible for American Association of PROFICIENCY EXAMINA­ Dr. Lloyd Borstelmann of tbe response to the Political Science sculptings, paintings and work/study grants and would University Professors will occur TIONS: Students wishing to Dsychology dept. wiU discuss his Union proposition, we are drawings or a description of like to apply for summer job of on April 18 at 8 p.m. in Zener demonstrate their foreign Current research Tues.. April 16 extending the deadline for your dance) this week for the Chapel Attendant should caU Auditorium, The speaker will be language proficiency by at 8 p.m. in the Cleland Parlor. return of ballots until Wed., ASDU Arts Prize Program. 2921 for an appointment for an Jay David Ross, Director of the examination in German, French, "Child Rearing: Yesterday, April 17. Please turn in your Works will be on display Fri. interview. Office of Institutional Latin, Italian, or Spanish may Today and Tomorrow" ballots Immediately! Elections and Sat. Judging will be on Sat. Advancement. The subject of everyone is Invited, morning. Prizes of $50 and $10 do so on Mon., Apr. 29, 1974. for officers will be postponsed Sail the iaharr his talk wiU be "A REPORT ON Registration for tbla rcfreshm e its wUl be served, till next fall.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Majoritarian Difficulty and Theories of Constitutional Decision Making
    THE MAJORITARIAN DIFFICULTY AND THEORIES OF CONSTITUTIONAL DECISION MAKING Michael C. Dorf* Recent scholarship in political science and law challenges the view that judicial review in the United States poses what Alexander Bickel famously called the “counter-majoritarian difficulty.” Although courts do regularly invalidate state and federal action on constitutional grounds, they rarely depart substantially from the median of public opinion. When they do so depart, if public opinion does not eventually come in line with the judicial view, constitutional amendment, changes in judicial personnel, and/or changes in judicial doctrine typically bring judicial understandings closer to public opinion. But if the modesty of courts dissolves Bickel’s worry, it raises a distinct one: Are courts that roughly follow public opinion capable of protecting minority rights against majoritarian excesses? Do American courts, in other words, have a “majoritarian difficulty?” This Article examines that question from an interpretive perspective. It asks whether there is a normatively attractive account of the practice of judicial review that takes account of the Court’s inability to act in a strongly counter-majoritarian fashion. After highlighting difficulties with three of the leading approaches to constitutional interpretation— representation-reinforcement, originalism, and living constitutionalism—the Essay concludes that accounts of the Court as a kind of third legislative chamber fit best with its majoritarian bias. However, such third-legislative-chamber accounts rest on libertarian premises that lack universal appeal. They also lack prescriptive force, although this may be a strength: Subordinating an interpretive theory—such as representation-reinforcement, originalism, or living constitutionalism—to a view of judicial review as a form of third-legislative-chamber veto can ease the otherwise unrealistic demands for counter-majoritarianism that interpretive theories face.
    [Show full text]
  • Alexander Bickel's Philosophy of Prudence
    The Yale Law Journal Volume 94, Number 7, June 1985 Alexander Bickel's Philosophy of Prudence Anthony T. Kronmant INTRODUCTION Six years after Alexander Bickel's death, John Hart Ely described his former teacher and colleague as "probably the most creative constitutional theorist of the past twenty years."" Many today would concur in Ely's judgment.' Indeed, among his academic peers, Bickel is widely -regarded with a measure of respect that borders on reverence. There is, however, something puzzling about Bickel's reputation, for despite the high regard in which his work is held, Bickel has few contemporary followers.' There is, today, no Bickelian school of constitutional theory, no group of scholars working to elaborate Bickel's main ideas or even to defend them, no con- tinuing and connected body of legal writing in the intellectual tradition to which Bickel claimed allegiance. In fact, just the opposite is true. In the decade since his death, constitutional theory has turned away from the ideas that Bickel championed, moving in directions he would, I believe, f Professor of Law, Yale Law School. 1. J. ELY, DEMOCRACY AND DISTRUST 71 (1980). 2. See B. SCHMIDT, HISTORY OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES: THE JUDICI- ARY AND RESPONSIBLE GOVERNMENT 1910-21 (pt. 2) 722 (1984) (describing Bickel as "the most brilliant and influential constitutional scholar of the generation that came of age during the era of the Warren Court"); Ackerman, The Storrs Lectures: Discovering the Constitution, 93 YALE L.J. 1013, 1014 (Bickel "revered as spokesman-in-chief for a school of thought that emphasizes the importance of judicial restraint").
    [Show full text]
  • Network Map of Knowledge And
    Humphry Davy George Grosz Patrick Galvin August Wilhelm von Hofmann Mervyn Gotsman Peter Blake Willa Cather Norman Vincent Peale Hans Holbein the Elder David Bomberg Hans Lewy Mark Ryden Juan Gris Ian Stevenson Charles Coleman (English painter) Mauritz de Haas David Drake Donald E. Westlake John Morton Blum Yehuda Amichai Stephen Smale Bernd and Hilla Becher Vitsentzos Kornaros Maxfield Parrish L. Sprague de Camp Derek Jarman Baron Carl von Rokitansky John LaFarge Richard Francis Burton Jamie Hewlett George Sterling Sergei Winogradsky Federico Halbherr Jean-Léon Gérôme William M. Bass Roy Lichtenstein Jacob Isaakszoon van Ruisdael Tony Cliff Julia Margaret Cameron Arnold Sommerfeld Adrian Willaert Olga Arsenievna Oleinik LeMoine Fitzgerald Christian Krohg Wilfred Thesiger Jean-Joseph Benjamin-Constant Eva Hesse `Abd Allah ibn `Abbas Him Mark Lai Clark Ashton Smith Clint Eastwood Therkel Mathiassen Bettie Page Frank DuMond Peter Whittle Salvador Espriu Gaetano Fichera William Cubley Jean Tinguely Amado Nervo Sarat Chandra Chattopadhyay Ferdinand Hodler Françoise Sagan Dave Meltzer Anton Julius Carlson Bela Cikoš Sesija John Cleese Kan Nyunt Charlotte Lamb Benjamin Silliman Howard Hendricks Jim Russell (cartoonist) Kate Chopin Gary Becker Harvey Kurtzman Michel Tapié John C. Maxwell Stan Pitt Henry Lawson Gustave Boulanger Wayne Shorter Irshad Kamil Joseph Greenberg Dungeons & Dragons Serbian epic poetry Adrian Ludwig Richter Eliseu Visconti Albert Maignan Syed Nazeer Husain Hakushu Kitahara Lim Cheng Hoe David Brin Bernard Ogilvie Dodge Star Wars Karel Capek Hudson River School Alfred Hitchcock Vladimir Colin Robert Kroetsch Shah Abdul Latif Bhittai Stephen Sondheim Robert Ludlum Frank Frazetta Walter Tevis Sax Rohmer Rafael Sabatini Ralph Nader Manon Gropius Aristide Maillol Ed Roth Jonathan Dordick Abdur Razzaq (Professor) John W.
    [Show full text]
  • Entire Issue (PDF)
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 114 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION Vol. 162 WASHINGTON, THURSDAY, MARCH 17, 2016 No. 43 House of Representatives The House met at 9 a.m. and was point of order that a quorum is not Gunny Stanton first began his train- called to order by the Speaker. present. ing, he attended the basic EOD course f The SPEAKER. Pursuant to clause 8, at Eglin Air Force Base. While in train- rule XX, further proceedings on this ing, his block tests and final examina- PRAYER question will be postponed. tion scores were so high that his The Chaplain, the Reverend Patrick The point of no quorum is considered records remain intact to this day. J. Conroy, offered the following prayer: withdrawn. In the course of his 18 years in the Marine Corps, Stanton earned many Merciful God, thank You for giving f us another day. awards too numerous to list in this Your care and wisdom are shown to PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE space. He is preceded in death by his fa- us by the way You extend Your king- The SPEAKER. Will the gentleman ther, Michael Dale Stanton Sr.; and a dom into our world down to the present from Texas (Mr. VEASEY) come forward brother, Brian Stanton. Gunny Stanton day. Your word reveals every aspect of and lead the House in the Pledge of Al- is survived by his loving family: his Your saving plan. You accomplish Your legiance. wife, Terri Stanton; his mother, Gloria designed purpose in and through the Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Is Qualified Immunity Unlawful?
    Is Qualified Immunity Unlawful? William Baude* The doctrine of qualified immunity operates as an unwritten defense to civil rights lawsuits brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. It prevents plaintiffs from recovering damages for violations of their constitutional rights unless a government official violated “clearly established law,” which usually requires specific precedent on point. This Article argues that the qualified immunity doctrine is unlawful and inconsistent with conventional principles of statutory interpretation. Members of the Supreme Court have offered three different justifications for imposing this unwritten defense on the text of Section 1983. First, that the doctrine of qualified immunity derives from a common-law “good-faith” defense. Second, that it compensates for an earlier putative mistake in broadening the statute. Third, that it provides “fair warning” to government officials, akin to the rule of lenity. On closer examination, each of these justifications falls apart for a mix of historical, conceptual, and doctrinal reasons. There was no such defense; there was no such mistake; lenity ought not apply. Furthermore, even if these things were otherwise, the doctrine of qualified immunity would not be the best response. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.15779/Z38MG7FV8G Copyright © 2018 California Law Review, Inc. California Law Review, Inc. (CLR) is a California nonprofit corporation. CLR and the authors are solely responsible for the content of their publications. * Neubauer Family Assistant Professor of Law, University of
    [Show full text]
  • The Judicial Function Under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms Anne F Bayefsky
    The Judicial Function under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms Anne F Bayefsky* The author surveys the various American L'auteur resume les differentes theories am6- theories of judicial review in an attempt to ricaines du contr61e judiciaire dans le but de suggest approaches to a Canadian theory of sugg6rer une th6orie canadienne du r8le des the role of the judiciary under the Canadian juges sous Ia Charte canadiennedes droits et Charter of Rights and Freedoms. A detailed libert~s. Notamment, une 6tude d6taille de examination of the legislative histories of sec- 'histoire 1fgislative des articles 1, 52 et 33 de ]a Charte d6montre que les r~dacteurs ont tions 1, 52 and 33 of the Charterreveals that voulu aller au-delA de la Dclarationcana- the drafters intended to move beyond the Ca- dienne des droits et 6liminer le principe de ]a nadianBill ofRights and away from the prin- souverainet6 parlementaire. Cette intention ciple of parliamentary sovereignty. This ne se trouvant pas incorpor6e dans toute sa intention was not fully incorporated into the force au texte de Ia Charte,la protection des Charter,with the result that, properly speak- droits et libert~s au Canada n'est pas, Apro- ing, Canada's constitutional bill of rights is prement parler, o enchfiss~e )) dans ]a cons- not "entrenched". The author concludes by titution. En conclusion, l'auteur met 'accent emphasizing the establishment of a "contin- sur l'instauration d'un < colloque continu uing colloquy" involving the courts, the po- auxquels participeraient les tribunaux, les litical institutions, the legal profession and institutions politiques, ]a profession juri- society at large, in the hope that the legiti- dique et le grand public; ]a l6gitimit6 de la macy of the judicial protection of Charter protection judiciaire des droits garantis par rights will turn on the consent of the gov- la Charte serait alors fond6e sur la volont6 erned and the perceived justice of the courts' des constituants et Ia perception populaire de decisions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Originalism That Was, and the One That Will Be
    GREVE (DO NOT DELETE) 3/28/2013 10:11 AM The Originalism That Was, and the One That Will Be Michael S. Greve* INTRODUCTION The original title for the conference talk on which this brief article is based, hand-picked by the excellent Jack Balkin, was, “What Was Originalism.” While characteristically clever and provocative, the suggestion of originalism’s death captures my position only imperfectly. I believe that originalism—in a broad, generic sense, encompassing any belief that the text is the baseline and that its authors’ expectations count for something—will become more orthodox than ever. And, like many participants at Jack’s wonderful conference, I suspect that his Living Originalism1 will hasten that trend: already, originalism’s conservative sentinels have predictably attempted to pocket the “originalism” part and to dismiss the “living” elements.2 However, a certain kind of conservative originalism, or perhaps several positions in originalism’s “logical space,”3 has or have become unsustainable—partly for theoretical, academic reasons, but in much larger part on account of changes in the broader political context in which originalism operates. Originalism will live, but its dominant forms will have a different tone and orientation. The originalism that in my estimation has outlived its usefulness has three central, interrelated features. First, it is Court-centered and preoccupied with legal interpretation. Second, it is positivist: judges must follow the constitutional rules because they are what they are and because the 1788 sovereign said so; any talk about why he, or we, or she the people said so is for interpretive purposes off limits.
    [Show full text]
  • Pg0140 Layout 1
    New Releases HILLSONG UNITED: LIVE IN MIAMI Table of Contents Giving voice to a generation pas- Accompaniment Tracks . .14, 15 sionate about God, the modern Bargains . .20, 21, 38 rock praise & worship band shares 22 tracks recorded live on their Collections . .2–4, 18, 19, 22–27, sold-out Aftermath Tour. Includes 31–33, 35, 36, 38, 39 the radio single “Search My Heart,” “Break Free,” “Mighty to Save,” Contemporary & Pop . .6–9, back cover “Rhythms of Grace,” “From the Folios & Songbooks . .16, 17 Inside Out,” “Your Name High,” “Take It All,” “With Everything,” and the Gifts . .back cover tour theme song. Two CDs. Hymns . .26, 27 $ 99 KTCD23395 Retail $14.99 . .CBD Price12 Inspirational . .22, 23 Also available: Instrumental . .24, 25 KTCD28897 Deluxe CD . 19.99 15.99 KT623598 DVD . 14.99 12.99 Kids’ Music . .18, 19 Movie DVDs . .A1–A36 he spring and summer months are often New Releases . .2–5 Tpacked with holidays, graduations, celebra- Praise & Worship . .32–37 tions—you name it! So we had you and all your upcoming gift-giving needs in mind when we Rock & Alternative . .10–13 picked the products to feature on these pages. Southern Gospel, Country & Bluegrass . .28–31 You’ll find $5 bargains on many of our best-sell- WOW . .39 ing albums (pages 20 & 21) and 2-CD sets (page Search our entire music and film inventory 38). Give the special grad in yourConGRADulations! life something unique and enjoyable with the by artist, title, or topic at Christianbook.com! Class of 2012 gift set on the back cover.
    [Show full text]
  • AD GUITAR INSTRUCTION** 943 Songs, 2.8 Days, 5.36 GB
    Page 1 of 28 **AD GUITAR INSTRUCTION** 943 songs, 2.8 days, 5.36 GB Name Time Album Artist 1 I Am Loved 3:27 The Golden Rule Above the Golden State 2 Highway to Hell TUNED 3:32 AD Tuned Files and Edits AC/DC 3 Dirty Deeds Tuned 4:16 AD Tuned Files and Edits AC/DC 4 TNT Tuned 3:39 AD Tuned Files and Edits AC/DC 5 Back in Black 4:20 Back in Black AC/DC 6 Back in Black Too Slow 6:40 Back in Black AC/DC 7 Hells Bells 5:16 Back in Black AC/DC 8 Dirty Deeds Done Dirt Cheap 4:16 Dirty Deeds Done Dirt Cheap AC/DC 9 It's A Long Way To The Top ( If You… 5:15 High Voltage AC/DC 10 Who Made Who 3:27 Who Made Who AC/DC 11 You Shook Me All Night Long 3:32 AC/DC 12 Thunderstruck 4:52 AC/DC 13 TNT 3:38 AC/DC 14 Highway To Hell 3:30 AC/DC 15 For Those About To Rock (We Sal… 5:46 AC/DC 16 Rock n' Roll Ain't Noise Pollution 4:13 AC/DC 17 Blow Me Away in D 3:27 AD Tuned Files and Edits AD Tuned Files 18 F.S.O.S. in D 2:41 AD Tuned Files and Edits AD Tuned Files 19 Here Comes The Sun Tuned and… 4:48 AD Tuned Files and Edits AD Tuned Files 20 Liar in E 3:12 AD Tuned Files and Edits AD Tuned Files 21 LifeInTheFastLaneTuned 4:45 AD Tuned Files and Edits AD Tuned Files 22 Love Like Winter E 2:48 AD Tuned Files and Edits AD Tuned Files 23 Make Damn Sure in E 3:34 AD Tuned Files and Edits AD Tuned Files 24 No More Sorrow in D 3:44 AD Tuned Files and Edits AD Tuned Files 25 No Reason in E 3:07 AD Tuned Files and Edits AD Tuned Files 26 The River in E 3:18 AD Tuned Files and Edits AD Tuned Files 27 Dream On 4:27 Aerosmith's Greatest Hits Aerosmith 28 Sweet Emotion
    [Show full text]
  • The Secret Life of the Political Question Doctrine
    Georgetown University Law Center Scholarship @ GEORGETOWN LAW 2004 The Secret Life of the Political Question Doctrine Louis Michael Seidman Georgetown University Law Center, [email protected] This paper can be downloaded free of charge from: https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub/563 37 J. Marshall L. Rev. 441-480 (2004) This open-access article is brought to you by the Georgetown Law Library. Posted with permission of the author. Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub Part of the Constitutional Law Commons, Jurisprudence Commons, and the Law and Politics Commons THE SECRET LIFE OF THE POLITICAL QUESTION DOCTRINE LOUIS MICHAEL SEIDMAN· "Questions, in their nature political, or which are, by the constitution and laws, submitted to the executive, can never be . made in this court."l The irony, of course, is that Marbury v. Madison, itself, "made" a political question, and the answer the Court gave was deeply political as well. As everyone reading this essay knows, the case arose out of a bitter political controversy,2 and the opinion for the Court was a carefully crafted political document-"a masterwork of indirection," according to Robert McCloskey's well­ known characterization, "a brilliant example of Chief Justice Marshall's capacity to sidestep danger while seemingly to court it, to advance in one direction while his opponents are looking in another. ,,3 The purpose of this essay is to explore the many layers of this irony. I will argue that despite all of the premature reports of its demise, the political question doctrine is as central to modern • Professor of Law, Georgetown University Law Center.
    [Show full text]
  • American Liberals and Judicial Activism: Alexander Bickel's Appeal from the New to the Old
    Indiana Law Journal Volume 51 Issue 4 Article 3 Spring 1976 American Liberals and Judicial Activism: Alexander Bickel's Appeal from the New to the Old Maurice J. Holland Indiana University School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/ilj Part of the Judges Commons, Jurisprudence Commons, and the Law and Politics Commons Recommended Citation Holland, Maurice J. (1976) "American Liberals and Judicial Activism: Alexander Bickel's Appeal from the New to the Old," Indiana Law Journal: Vol. 51 : Iss. 4 , Article 3. Available at: https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/ilj/vol51/iss4/3 This Essay is brought to you for free and open access by the Law School Journals at Digital Repository @ Maurer Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Indiana Law Journal by an authorized editor of Digital Repository @ Maurer Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Review Essay American Liberals and Judicial Activism: Alexander Bickel's Appeal from the New to the Old MAURICE J. HOLLAND* I. Before his death in November 1974, Alexander Bickel ranked among the handful of American legal scholars who could fairly be described as men of letters.' This was more than a matter of the lucid and elegant prose in which, in contributions to Ne~w Republic and Comn- mentary over the span of two decades, he illuminated a remarkably various range of subjects. That Bickel attained to more than conven- tional professional eminence in his academic speciality of constitutional law was most owing to the extraordinary breadth of conception he brought to that pursuit.
    [Show full text]
  • 95Th Annual Honors Convocation
    95TH ANNUAL HONORS CONVOCATION MARCH 18, 2018 2:00 P.M. HILL AUDITORIUM This year marks the 95th Honors Convocation held at the University of Michigan since the first was instituted on May 13, 1924, by President Marion LeRoy Burton. On these occasions, the University publicly recognizes and commends the undergraduate students in its schools and colleges who have earned distinguished academic records or have excelled as leaders in the community. It is with great pride that the University honors those students who have most clearly and effectively demonstrated academic excellence, dynamic leadership, and inspirational volunteerism. The Honors Convocation ranks with the Commencement Exercises as among the most important ceremonies of the University year. The names of the students who are honored for outstanding achievement this year appear in this program. They include all students who have earned University Honors in both Winter 2017 and Fall 2017, plus all seniors who have earned University Honors in either Winter 2017 or Fall 2017. The William J. Branstrom Freshman Prize recipients are listed, as well—recognizing first year undergraduate students whose academic achievement during their first semester on campus place them in the upper five percent of their school or college class. James B. Angell Scholars—students who receive all “A” grades over consecutive terms—are given a special place in the program. In addition, the student speaker is recognized individually for exemplary contributions to the University community. To all honored students, and to their parents, the University extends its hearty congratulations. Martin A. Philbert • Provost and Executive Vice President for Academic Affairs Honored Students Honored Faculty Faculty Colleagues and Friends of the University It is a pleasure to welcome you to the 95th University of Michigan Honors Convocation.
    [Show full text]