DOCSLIB.ORG

Structure of Human Mad1 C-Terminal Domain Reveals Its Involvement in Kinetochore Targeting

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Structure of Human Mad1 C-Terminal Domain Reveals Its Involvement in Kinetochore Targeting Structure of human Mad1 C-terminal domain reveals its involvement in kinetochore targeting Soonjoung Kima,b,1, Hongbin Suna,1,2, Diana R. Tomchickc, Hongtao Yua,b,3, and Xuelian Luoa,3 aDepartment of Pharmacology, bHoward Hughes Medical Institute, and cDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 6001 Forest Park Road, Dallas, TX 75390 Edited by Edward D. Salmon, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, and accepted by the Editorial Board February 28, 2012 (received for review November 4, 2011) The spindle checkpoint prevents aneuploidy by delaying anaphase and sufficient for its kinetochore localization and checkpoint func- onset until all sister chromatids achieve proper microtubule attach- tion (18). By contrast, an N-terminal fragment of Xenopus Mad1 ment. The kinetochore-bound checkpoint protein complex Mad1- lacking the CTD has been shown to localize to kinetochores (19). Mad2 promotes the conformational activation of Mad2 and serves Finally, mutation of T680, a residue within the CTD and a poten- as a catalytic engine of checkpoint signaling. How Mad1 is targeted tial Plk1 phosphorylation site, in human Mad1 has been reported to kinetochores is not understood. Here, we report the crystal to diminish its kinetochore localization (20). It is thus unclear structure of the conserved C-terminal domain (CTD) of human whether Mad1 has conserved kinetochore-targeting domains. Mad1. Mad1 CTD forms a homodimer and, unexpectedly, has a fold The kinetochore receptor or receptors of Mad1 are also unknown. similar to those of the kinetochore-binding domains of Spc25 and In this study, we have determined the crystal structure of the Csm1. Nonoverlapping Mad1 fragments retain detectable kineto- CTD of human Mad1. Unexpectedly, Mad1 CTD has a fold si- chore targeting. Deletion of the CTD diminishes, does not abolish, milar to those of the kinetochore-targeting domains of the Ndc80 Mad1 kinetochore localization. Mutagenesis studies further map complex component Spc25 and the yeast monopolin subunit the functional interface of Mad1 CTD in kinetochore targeting Csm1, despite the lack of obvious sequence similarity. We show and implicate Bub1 as its receptor. Our results indicate that CTD that nonoverlapping fragments of Mad1 can achieve detectable is a part of an extensive kinetochore-binding interface of Mad1, kinetochore targeting. Deletion of Mad1 CTD diminishes, does BIOPHYSICS AND and rationalize graded kinetochore targeting of Mad1 during not abolish, Mad1 kinetochore targeting. Structure-based muta- checkpoint signaling. genesis identifies a conserved RLK motif in Mad1 CTD critical COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY for Mad1 kinetochore targeting in human cells. Interestingly, the dimerization ∣ mitosis ∣ X-ray crystallography ∣ multivalency ∣ chromosome same RLK motif is required for the checkpoint-stimulated Mad1- Bub1 interaction in yeast (21). Consistently, Bub1 is required for neuploidy is a major form of genomic instability in human Mad1 kinetochore targeting in human cells, and depletion of Acancers and can result from chromosome missegregation in Bub1 by RNA interference (RNAi) does not further reduce mitosis. The spindle checkpoint is a cell-cycle surveillance system the kinetochore targeting of a Mad1 RLK-motif mutant. These that guards against chromosome missegregation (1–3). Unat- results implicate Bub1 as a possible kinetochore receptor for tached kinetochores that exist intrinsically during normal prome- Mad1 CTD. Therefore, Mad1 has an unusually extensive kineto- taphase or as a consequence of spindle damage caused by exogen- chore-binding interface with multiple quasi-independent contact- ous chemical agents activate the checkpoint. The spindle check- ing sites, one of which involves the CTD. point proteins, including Bub1, BubR1, Bub3, Mps1, Mad1, and Mad2, are recruited to unattached kinetochores in a hierarchical Results fashion and undergo enzymatic and conformational activation. Mad1 CTD Forms a Dimer and Has a Fold Similar to Spc25. Mad1 con- The activated checkpoint proteins collaborate to inhibit APC∕ tains an N-terminal coiled coil domain and a CTD (Fig. 1A). The CCdc20 (the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome bound to Mad2-interacting motif (MIM) is located just N-terminal to the its mitotic activator Cdc20) (4–6), thereby stabilizing the APC/ CTD. The structure of a 120-residue Mad2-binding fragment of C substrates, securin and cyclin B1, and delaying anaphase onset human Mad1 bound to Mad2 had been previously determined until all kinetochores reach proper spindle attachment. (11). Other domains of Mad1 had not been structurally charac- The constitutive Mad1-Mad2 core complex is a downstream terized. Because Mad1 CTD was highly conserved from yeast to component of the kinetochore-targeting hierarchy. The recruit- man, we sought to determine its structure. We expressed and pur- ment of Mad1-Mad2 to unattached kinetochores requires up- ified a series of CTD-containing human Mad1 fragments with dif- stream kinetochore-bound components, including the Ndc80 ferent N-terminal boundaries and examined them using nuclear complex consisting of Ndc80, Nuf2, Spc25, and Spc24 (7, 8). At the magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. Heteronuclear single kinetochores, the Mad1-Mad2 core complex catalyzes the confor- mational activation of the unusual two-state protein Mad2, which has two natively folded conformers, open-Mad2 (O-Mad2 or N1- Author contributions: H.Y. and X.L. designed research; S.K., H.S., and X.L. performed research; S.K., D.R.T., H.Y., and X.L. analyzed data; and H.Y. and X.L. wrote the paper. Mad2) and closed-Mad2 (C-Mad2 or N2-Mad2) (9–16). C-Mad2 in the Mad1-Mad2 core complex recruits cytosolic O-Mad2 through The authors declare no conflict of interest. asymmetric dimerization and converts O-Mad2 into intermediate This article is a PNAS Direct Submission. E.D.S. is a guest editor invited by the Editorial Board. Mad2 (I-Mad2) or unliganded C-Mad2, which then binds to Data deposition: The atomic coordinates have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank, Cdc20. Formation of the Mad2-Cdc20 complex further promotes www.pdb.org (PDB code 4DZO). the binding of BubR1-Bub3 to Cdc20, forming the APC/C-inhibi- 1S.K. and H.S. contributed equally to this work. tory mitotic checkpoint complex (17). Thus, the Mad1-Mad2 core 2Present address: Bio-NMR lab, High Magnetic Field Laboratory, Chinese Academy of complex is a key catalytic engine of the spindle checkpoint. Sciences, Hefei Institutes of Physical Sciences, Hefei, Anhui 230031, China. Despite the importance of kinetochore-bound Mad1 in the 3To whom correspondence may be addressed. E-mail: [email protected] or spindle checkpoint, the mechanism of its kinetochore targeting [email protected]. is not understood. A C-terminal fragment of yeast Mad1 contain- This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/ ing the highly conserved C-terminal domain (CTD) is necessary doi:10.1073/pnas.1118210109/-/DCSupplemental. www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1118210109 PNAS ∣ April 24, 2012 ∣ vol. 109 ∣ no. 17 ∣ 6549–6554 Downloaded by guest on September 24, 2021 The N-terminal segments of two αA helices (one from each monomer) form the stem. αC and the C-terminal end of αA med- iate the dimerization of the globular head. The fold of Mad1 CTD was strikingly similar to those of the kinetochore-targeting C-terminal domains of Spc25 (a subunit of the microtubule-bind- ing Ndc80 kinetochore complex) and Csm1 (a subunit of the yeast monopolin complex) (Fig. 1 B and C) (22–24). This fold was also related to those of the RWD (RING finger-, WD-repeat-, and DEAD-like proteins) domain and ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes (25, 26). The fold similarity between Mad1 CTD and the CTDs of Spc25 and Csm1 was unexpected, as they share no obvious se- quence similarity. Both CTDs of Mad1 and Csm1 form homodi- mers while Spc25 forms a heterodimer with the CTD of another Ndc80 subunit Spc24. Spc24 CTD is topologically related, but not identical, to Spc25 CTD (22, 23). The Mad1 CTD homodimer is thus structurally similar to the Spc25-Spc24 CTD heterodimer and to the Csm1 homodimer (Fig. 1B). Mad1 Has Multiple Quasi-Independent Kinetochore-Binding Inter- faces. The globular CTD heterodimer of Spc25 and Spc24 med- iates the kinetochore targeting of the Ndc80 complex through interactions with the Mis12 complex (23, 27). Similarly, the glob- Fig. 1. Structure of the Mad1 CTD reveals fold similarity to the Ndc80 ular CTD homodimer of Csm1 has also been shown to bind to complex subunit Spc25 and the monopolin subunit Csm1. (A) Domain archi- kinetochores and interact with both the Mis12 complex and tecture of human Mad1. MIM, Mad2-interacting motif. CTD, C-terminal do- CENP-C (centromere protein C) (24). The unexpected structural main. (B) Ribbon diagrams of human Mad1 CTD homodimer (left), the Spc25- similarity between Mad1 CTD and well established kinetochore- Spc24 CTD heterodimer (center; PDB code: 2VE7), and the Csm1 homodimer (right; PDB code: 3N4X). (C) Topology diagrams of Mad1 CTD (left), Spc25 CTD targeting domains prompted us to test whether the CTD was in- (middle), and Csm1 (right). All ribbon diagrams were generated using the deed involved in kinetochore targeting of human Mad1. On the program Pymol (http://www.pymol.org). other hand, previous studies had shown that the N-terminal do- main of Xenopus Mad1 was critical for kinetochore targeting (19). quantum correlation spectra revealed that the Mad1 CTD frag- To systematically define the kinetochore-binding domains of – ment containing residues 597 718 was well folded and had no human Mad1, we created truncation mutants of Myc-Mad1-5A A flexible regions (Fig. S1 ). Based on gel filtration chromatogra- and examined their kinetochore localization using immunofluor- phy, it had a native molecular mass of about 35 kDa, consistent escence (Fig. 2). Overexpression of Mad1 caused spindle check- with it being a homodimer (Fig. S1B). We next obtained crystals point defects by titrating free Mad2 (Fig.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Analysis of Gene Expression Data for Gene Ontology
    ANALYSIS OF GENE EXPRESSION DATA FOR GENE ONTOLOGY BASED PROTEIN FUNCTION PREDICTION A Thesis Presented to The Graduate Faculty of The University of Akron In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science Robert Daniel Macholan May 2011 ANALYSIS OF GENE EXPRESSION DATA FOR GENE ONTOLOGY BASED PROTEIN FUNCTION PREDICTION Robert Daniel Macholan Thesis Approved: Accepted: _______________________________ _______________________________ Advisor Department Chair Dr. Zhong-Hui Duan Dr. Chien-Chung Chan _______________________________ _______________________________ Committee Member Dean of the College Dr. Chien-Chung Chan Dr. Chand K. Midha _______________________________ _______________________________ Committee Member Dean of the Graduate School Dr. Yingcai Xiao Dr. George R. Newkome _______________________________ Date ii ABSTRACT A tremendous increase in genomic data has encouraged biologists to turn to bioinformatics in order to assist in its interpretation and processing. One of the present challenges that need to be overcome in order to understand this data more completely is the development of a reliable method to accurately predict the function of a protein from its genomic information. This study focuses on developing an effective algorithm for protein function prediction. The algorithm is based on proteins that have similar expression patterns. The similarity of the expression data is determined using a novel measure, the slope matrix. The slope matrix introduces a normalized method for the comparison of expression levels throughout a proteome. The algorithm is tested using real microarray gene expression data. Their functions are characterized using gene ontology annotations. The results of the case study indicate the protein function prediction algorithm developed is comparable to the prediction algorithms that are based on the annotations of homologous proteins.
    [Show full text]
  • Mad1 Kinetochore Recruitment by Mps1-Mediated Phosphorylation of Bub1 Signals the Spindle Checkpoint
    Downloaded from genesdev.cshlp.org on September 29, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Mad1 kinetochore recruitment by Mps1-mediated phosphorylation of Bub1 signals the spindle checkpoint Nitobe London1,2 and Sue Biggins1,3 1Division of Basic Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington 98109, USA; 2Molecular and Cellular Biology Program, University of Washington/Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington 98109, USA The spindle checkpoint is a conserved signaling pathway that ensures genomic integrity by preventing cell division when chromosomes are not correctly attached to the spindle. Checkpoint activation depends on the hierarchical recruitment of checkpoint proteins to generate a catalytic platform at the kinetochore. Although Mad1 kinetochore localization is the key regulatory downstream event in this cascade, its receptor and mechanism of recruitment have not been conclusively identified. Here, we demonstrate that Mad1 kinetochore association in budding yeast is mediated by phosphorylation of a region within the Bub1 checkpoint protein by the conserved protein kinase Mps1. Tethering this region of Bub1 to kinetochores bypasses the checkpoint requirement for Mps1-mediated kinetochore recruitment of upstream checkpoint proteins. The Mad1 interaction with Bub1 and kinetochores can be reconstituted in the presence of Mps1 and Mad2. Together, this work reveals a critical mechanism that determines kinetochore activation of the spindle checkpoint. [Keywords: kinetochore; spindle checkpoint; Mps1 kinase; Mad1; Bub1 kinase] Supplemental material is available for this article. Received October 25, 2013; revised version accepted December 13, 2013. Successful eukaryotic cell division requires accurate the conserved checkpoint proteins Mps1, Bub1, Bub3, chromosome segregation, which relies on correct attach- Mad1, and Mad2 as well as the Mad3 homolog BubRI in ments of spindle microtubules to chromosomes.
    [Show full text]
  • Mitotic Arrest Deficient 2 Expression Induces Chemosensitization to a DNA-Damaging Agent, Cisplatin, in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Cells
    Research Article Mitotic Arrest Deficient 2 Expression Induces Chemosensitization to a DNA-Damaging Agent, Cisplatin, in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Cells Hiu Wing Cheung,1 Dong-Yan Jin,2 Ming-tat Ling,1 Yong Chuan Wong,1 Qi Wang,1 Sai Wah Tsao,1 and Xianghong Wang1 Departments of 1Anatomy and 2Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China Abstract mitotic checkpoint control, may be associated with tumorigenesis Recently, mitotic arrest deficient 2 (MAD2)–mediated spindle as well as cancer progression. Several regulators of the mitotic checkpoint have been identified checkpoint is shown to induce mitotic arrest in response to DNA damage, indicating overlapping roles of the spindle and most of them are localized to the kinetochore, which is checkpoint and DNA damage checkpoint. In this study, we connected to both the chromosome and the spindle (1). One of investigated if MAD2 played a part in cellular sensitivity to them, mitotic arrest deficient 2 (MAD2), is thought to be a key DNA-damaging agents, especially cisplatin, and whether it was component for a functional mitotic checkpoint because it is regulated through mitotic checkpoint. Using nine nasopha- required for generating the ‘‘wait’’ signal in response to microtubule ryngeal carcinoma (NPC) cell lines, we found that decreased disruption (1). Deletion or down-regulation of MAD2 leads to MAD2 expression was correlated with cellular resistance to mitotic checkpoint inactivation and chromosomal instability (4–6). cisplatin compared with the cell lines with high levels of Down-regulation of MAD2 has also been reported in human MAD2. Exogenous MAD2 expression in NPC cells also cancers such as lung (7), breast (8), nasopharyngeal (9), and ovarian conferred sensitivity to DNA-damaging agents especially carcinomas (10).
    [Show full text]
  • Real-Time Dynamics of Plasmodium NDC80 Reveals Unusual Modes of Chromosome Segregation During Parasite Proliferation Mohammad Zeeshan1,*, Rajan Pandey1,*, David J
    © 2020. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd | Journal of Cell Science (2021) 134, jcs245753. doi:10.1242/jcs.245753 RESEARCH ARTICLE SPECIAL ISSUE: CELL BIOLOGY OF HOST–PATHOGEN INTERACTIONS Real-time dynamics of Plasmodium NDC80 reveals unusual modes of chromosome segregation during parasite proliferation Mohammad Zeeshan1,*, Rajan Pandey1,*, David J. P. Ferguson2,3, Eelco C. Tromer4, Robert Markus1, Steven Abel5, Declan Brady1, Emilie Daniel1, Rebecca Limenitakis6, Andrew R. Bottrill7, Karine G. Le Roch5, Anthony A. Holder8, Ross F. Waller4, David S. Guttery9 and Rita Tewari1,‡ ABSTRACT eukaryotic organisms to proliferate, propagate and survive. During Eukaryotic cell proliferation requires chromosome replication and these processes, microtubular spindles form to facilitate an equal precise segregation to ensure daughter cells have identical genomic segregation of duplicated chromosomes to the spindle poles. copies. Species of the genus Plasmodium, the causative agents of Chromosome attachment to spindle microtubules (MTs) is malaria, display remarkable aspects of nuclear division throughout their mediated by kinetochores, which are large multiprotein complexes life cycle to meet some peculiar and unique challenges to DNA assembled on centromeres located at the constriction point of sister replication and chromosome segregation. The parasite undergoes chromatids (Cheeseman, 2014; McKinley and Cheeseman, 2016; atypical endomitosis and endoreduplication with an intact nuclear Musacchio and Desai, 2017; Vader and Musacchio, 2017). Each membrane and intranuclear mitotic spindle. To understand these diverse sister chromatid has its own kinetochore, oriented to facilitate modes of Plasmodium cell division, we have studied the behaviour movement to opposite poles of the spindle apparatus. During and composition of the outer kinetochore NDC80 complex, a key part of anaphase, the spindle elongates and the sister chromatids separate, the mitotic apparatus that attaches the centromere of chromosomes to resulting in segregation of the two genomes during telophase.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Spindle Assembly Checkpoint Is Sufficient for Complete Cdc20
    Spindle assembly checkpoint is sufficient for complete Cdc20 sequestering in mitotic control Bashar Ibrahim Bio System Analysis Group, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, and Jena Centre for Bioinformatics (JCB), 07743 Jena, Germany Email: [email protected] Abstract The spindle checkpoint assembly (SAC) ensures genome fidelity by temporarily delaying anaphase onset, until all chromosomes are properly attached to the mitotic spindle. The SAC delays mitotic progression by preventing activation of the ubiquitin ligase anaphase-promoting complex (APC/C) or cyclosome; whose activation by Cdc20 is required for sister-chromatid separation marking the transition into anaphase. The mitotic checkpoint complex (MCC), which contains Cdc20 as a subunit, binds stably to the APC/C. Compelling evidence by Izawa and Pines (Nature 2014; 10.1038/nature13911) indicates that the MCC can inhibit a second Cdc20 that has already bound and activated the APC/C. Whether or not MCC per se is sufficient to fully sequester Cdc20 and inhibit APC/C remains unclear. Here, a dynamic model for SAC regulation in which the MCC binds a second Cdc20 was constructed. This model is compared to the MCC, and the MCC-and-BubR1 (dual inhibition of APC) core model variants and subsequently validated with experimental data from the literature. By using ordinary nonlinear differential equations and spatial simulations, it is shown that the SAC works sufficiently to fully sequester Cdc20 and completely inhibit APC/C activity. This study highlights the principle that a systems biology approach is vital for molecular biology and could also be used for creating hypotheses to design future experiments. Keywords: Mathematical biology, Spindle assembly checkpoint; anaphase promoting complex, MCC, Cdc20, systems biology 1 Introduction Faithful DNA segregation, prior to cell division at mitosis, is vital for maintaining genomic integrity.
    [Show full text]
  • Kinetochores, Microtubules, and Spindle Assembly Checkpoint
    Review Joined at the hip: kinetochores, microtubules, and spindle assembly checkpoint signaling 1 1,2,3 Carlos Sacristan and Geert J.P.L. Kops 1 Molecular Cancer Research, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3584 CG Utrecht, The Netherlands 2 Center for Molecular Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3584 CG Utrecht, The Netherlands 3 Cancer Genomics Netherlands, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3584 CG Utrecht, The Netherlands Error-free chromosome segregation relies on stable and cell division. The messenger is the SAC (also known as connections between kinetochores and spindle microtu- the mitotic checkpoint) (Figure 1). bules. The spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) monitors The transition to anaphase is triggered by the E3 ubiqui- such connections and relays their absence to the cell tin ligase APC/C, which tags inhibitors of mitotic exit cycle machinery to delay cell division. The molecular (CYCLIN B) and of sister chromatid disjunction (SECURIN) network at kinetochores that is responsible for microtu- for proteasomal degradation [2]. The SAC has a one-track bule binding is integrated with the core components mind, inhibiting APC/C as long as incorrectly attached of the SAC signaling system. Molecular-mechanistic chromosomes persist. It goes about this in the most straight- understanding of how the SAC is coupled to the kineto- forward way possible: it assembles a direct and diffusible chore–microtubule interface has advanced significantly inhibitor of APC/C at kinetochores that are not connected in recent years. The latest insights not only provide a to spindle microtubules. This inhibitor is named the striking view of the dynamics and regulation of SAC mitotic checkpoint complex (MCC) (Figure 1).
    [Show full text]
  • MAD2 Expression in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Its Relationship to Tumor Grade and Proliferation
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH 34: 7021-7028 (2014) MAD2 Expression in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma and its Relationship to Tumor Grade and Proliferation CLARA RIZZARDI1, LUCIO TORELLI2, MANUELA SCHNEIDER3, FABIOLA GIUDICI4, LORENZO ZANDONA’1, MATTEO BIASOTTO5, ROBERTO DI LENARDA5 and MAURO MELATO6 1Unit of Pathology, Department of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy; 2Department of Mathematics and Earth Science, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy; 3Unit of Pathology, ASS n.2 “Isontina”, Gorizia, Italy; 4Department of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy; 5Unit of Odontology and Stomatology, Department of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy; 6Scientific Research Institute and Hospital for Pediatrics “Burlo Garofolo”, Trieste, Italy Abstract. Background: Defects in the cell-cycle surveillance might contribute to the chromosomal instability observed in mechanism, called the spindle checkpoint, might contribute human cancers. Molecular analysis of the genes involved in to the chromosomal instability observed in human cancers, the spindle checkpoint has revealed relatively few genetic including oral squamous cell carcinoma. MAD2 and BUBR1 alterations, suggesting that the spindle checkpoint are key components of the spindle checkpoint, whose role in impairment frequently found in many human cancers might oral carcinogenesis and clinical relevance still need to be result from mutations in as yet unidentified checkpoint genes elucidated. Materials and Methods: We analyzed the or altered expression of known checkpoint genes. A better expression of MAD2 in 49 cases of oral squamous cell understanding of this mechanism might provide valuable carcinoma by immunohistochemistry and compared the insights into CIN and facilitate the design of novel findings with clinicopathological parameters, proliferative therapeutic approaches to treat cancer.
    [Show full text]
  • Bub1 Positions Mad1 Close to KNL1 MELT Repeats to Promote Checkpoint Signalling
    ARTICLE Received 14 Dec 2016 | Accepted 3 May 2017 | Published 12 June 2017 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms15822 OPEN Bub1 positions Mad1 close to KNL1 MELT repeats to promote checkpoint signalling Gang Zhang1, Thomas Kruse1, Blanca Lo´pez-Me´ndez1, Kathrine Beck Sylvestersen1, Dimitriya H. Garvanska1, Simone Schopper1, Michael Lund Nielsen1 & Jakob Nilsson1 Proper segregation of chromosomes depends on a functional spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) and requires kinetochore localization of the Bub1 and Mad1/Mad2 checkpoint proteins. Several aspects of Mad1/Mad2 kinetochore recruitment in human cells are unclear and in particular the underlying direct interactions. Here we show that conserved domain 1 (CD1) in human Bub1 binds directly to Mad1 and a phosphorylation site exists in CD1 that stimulates Mad1 binding and SAC signalling. Importantly, fusion of minimal kinetochore-targeting Bub1 fragments to Mad1 bypasses the need for CD1, revealing that the main function of Bub1 is to position Mad1 close to KNL1 MELTrepeats. Furthermore, we identify residues in Mad1 that are critical for Mad1 functionality, but not Bub1 binding, arguing for a direct role of Mad1 in the checkpoint. This work dissects functionally relevant molecular interactions required for spindle assembly checkpoint signalling at kinetochores in human cells. 1 The Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3B, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark. Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to G.Z.
    [Show full text]
  • The Closed Form of Mad2 Is Bound to Mad1 and Cdc20 at Unattached Kinetochores
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/305763; this version posted April 21, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC 4.0 International license. The closed form of Mad2 is bound to Mad1 and Cdc20 at unattached kinetochores. Gang Zhang1,2,3 and Jakob Nilsson1 1 The Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, Faculty of health and medical sciences, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3B, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark 2 Cancer Institute, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong 266061, China 3 Qingdao Cancer Institute, Qingdao, Shandong 266061, China For correspondence: [email protected] or [email protected] Keywords: Mad2, Cdc20, Kinetochore, Spindle Assembly Checkpoint, Mad1 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/305763; this version posted April 21, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC 4.0 International license. ABSTRACT The spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) ensures accurate chromosome segregation by delaying anaphase onset in response to unattached kinetochores. Anaphase is delayed by the generation of the mitotic checkpoint complex (MCC) composed of the checkpoint proteins Mad2 and BubR1/Bub3 bound to the protein Cdc20. Current models assume that MCC production is catalyzed at unattached kinetochores and that the Mad1/Mad2 complex is instrumental in the conversion of Mad2 from an open form (O-Mad2) to a closed form (C-Mad2) that can bind to Cdc20.
    [Show full text]
  • The Aurora B Kinase Activity Is Required for the Maintenance of the Differentiated State of Murine Myoblasts
    Cell Death and Differentiation (2009) 16, 321–330 & 2009 Macmillan Publishers Limited All rights reserved 1350-9047/09 $32.00 www.nature.com/cdd The Aurora B kinase activity is required for the maintenance of the differentiated state of murine myoblasts G Amabile1,2, AM D’Alise1, M Iovino1, P Jones3, S Santaguida4, A Musacchio4, S Taylor5 and R Cortese*,1 Reversine is a synthetic molecule capable of inducing dedifferentiation of C2C12, a murine myoblast cell line, into multipotent progenitor cells, which can be redirected to differentiate in nonmuscle cell types under appropriate conditions. Reversine is also a potent inhibitor of Aurora B, a protein kinase required for mitotic chromosome segregation, spindle checkpoint function, cytokinesis and histone H3 phosphorylation, raising the possibility that the dedifferentiation capability of reversine is mediated through the inhibition of Aurora B. Indeed, here we show that several other well-characterized Aurora B inhibitors are capable of dedifferentiating C2C12 myoblasts. Significantly, expressing drug-resistant Aurora B mutants, which are insensitive to reversine block the dedifferentiation process, indicating that Aurora B kinase activity is required to maintain the differentiated state. We show that the inhibition of the spindle checkpoint or cytokinesis per se is not sufficient for dedifferentiation. Rather, our data support a model whereby changes in histone H3 phosphorylation result in chromatin remodeling, which in turn restores the multipotent state. Cell Death and Differentiation (2009) 16, 321–330; doi:10.1038/cdd.2008.156; published online 31 October 2008 Lineage-restricted cells can be reprogramed to a state Evidence is emerging that the role of Aurora B is not of pluripotency by several different manipulations, including restricted to mitosis and cell division.
    [Show full text]
  • Bipolar Orientation of Chromosomes in Saccharomyces Cerevisiae Is Monitored by Mad1 and Mad2, but Not by Mad3
    Bipolar orientation of chromosomes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is monitored by Mad1 and Mad2, but not by Mad3 Marina S. Lee and Forrest A. Spencer* McKusick–Nathans Institute of Genetic Medicine, School of Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205 Communicated by Carol W. Greider, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, June 10, 2004 (received for review March 20, 2004) The spindle checkpoint governs the timing of anaphase separation to the kinetochore (9). Vertebrate checkpoint proteins Mad2, of sister chromatids. In budding yeast, Mad1, Mad2, and Mad3 Bub1, Bub3, and BubR1 (a Mad3 homolog with a kinase proteins are equally required for arrest in the presence of damage domain) are also found at kinetochores when kinetochore– induced by antimicrotubule drugs or catastrophic loss of spindle microtubule attachment is prevented by microtubule-depoly- structure. We find that the MAD genes are not equally required for merizing drugs (11, 12). In unaltered prometaphase or during robust growth in the presence of more subtle kinetochore and recovery from antimicrotubule drug treatment, Mad2 localiza- microtubule damage. A mad1⌬ synthetic lethal screen identified 16 tion disappears from kinetochores upon capture by microtu- genes whose deletion in cells lacking MAD1 results in death or slow bules. Once tension is established across sister kinetochores at growth. Eleven of these mad1⌬ genetic interaction partners en- the metaphase plate, Bub1, Bub3, and BubR1 kinetochore code proteins at the kinetochore–microtubule interface. Analysis staining diminishes (11, 12). of the entire panel revealed similar phenotypes in combination In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Mad1, Mad2, and Mad3 are found with mad2⌬.
    [Show full text]
  • Original Article Nuclear Division Cycle 80 Complex Is Associated with Malignancy and Predicts Poor Survival of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Int J Clin Exp Pathol 2019;12(4):1233-1247 www.ijcep.com /ISSN:1936-2625/IJCEP0086788 Original Article Nuclear division cycle 80 complex is associated with malignancy and predicts poor survival of hepatocellular carcinoma Xiaowei Chen*, Wenwen Li*, Lushan Xiao, Li Liu Hepatology Unit and Department of Infectious Diseases, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, Guangdong, P. R. China. *Equal contributors. Received October 15, 2018; Accepted October 26, 2018; Epub April 1, 2019; Published April 15, 2019 Abstract: The NDC80 (nuclear division cycle 80) complex takes part in chromosome segregation by forming an outer kinetochore and providing a platform for the interaction between chromosomes and microtubules, thus impacting the progression of mitosis and the cell cycle. The clinical significance of its components, NDC80, nuf2, spc24, and spc25, were widely explored in various malignancies respectively, yet seldom were they studied from the perspec- tive of a complex. This paper explores the clinical importance of the NDC80 kinetochore complex components in terms of their expression level, prognostic value, and therapeutic potential in HCC (hepatocellular carcinoma) patients. With the data from several paired HCC samples from Nanfang Hospital, HCC patients from the TCGA da- tabase and other cases from GSE89377, we analyzed the expression levels of the NDC80 complex components, NDC80/nuf2/spc24/spc25, along with the survival data as well as other clinical features using statistical methods and GSEA. The study found that a high expression of NDC80 complex predicts poor survival, and these components have the potential to be used as therapeutic targets. Keywords: Hepatocellular carcinoma, nuclear division cycle 80 complex, overexpression, prognosis Introduction interfering screen also revealed the therapeutic potential of targeting NDC80 and nuf2 [10, 11].
    [Show full text]