AaBbCc 123456

MUNICI PAL COUNCI L L O RS 2 0 15 Òepee HeÀeTb[sMeve ner He#eefvejHes#e keÀece keÀjCeejer mJe³ebmesJeer mebmLee Deens. osMee®³ee Founded in 1998, the PRAJA Foundation is a non-partisan jep³ekeÀejYeejele menYeeieer nesC³eemeeþer veeieefjkeÀebveer me#ece JneJes ne J³eeHekeÀ GÎsMe voluntary organisation which empowers the citizen to participate in governance by providing knowledge and enlisting people’s meceesj þsTve 1998 ceO³es Òepee®eer meg©Jeele Peeueer. veeieefjkeÀebveer celeoeveeHegjlee®e participation. PRAJA aims to provide ways in which the citizen efJe®eej ve keÀjlee jepekeÀer³e¢<ìîee DeefOekeÀ me¬eÀer³e JneJes, jep³ekeÀejYeej DeefOekeÀ can get politically active and involved beyond the ballot box, HeejoMe&keÀ Je pevelesuee GÊejoe³eer DemeeJee ³ee ¢<ìerves ceeefnleer Je %eevee®ee mlej thus promoting transparency and accountability. Gb®eeJeC³eemeeþer Òepee mebmLesves efJeefJeOe GHe¬eÀce neleer Iesleues Deensle. Concerned about the lack of awareness and apathy of the mLeeefvekeÀ mJejep³e mebmLeeb®³ee keÀecee®eer ueeskeÀebvee ceeefnleer vemeles DeeefCe cnCetve l³eebvee local government among citizens, and hence the disinterest ³eeefJe

2 REPORT CARD MUNICIPAL COUNCILLORS 2015 3 he´cegKe efJeMues

DeO³ee³e He=<þ ¬eÀceebkeÀ Chapter Pg. No.

Òepee®eer ìerce 6 The Team 7

ueeskeÀÒeefleefveOeeR®es ÒeieefleHegmlekeÀ keÀe Heeefnpes DeeefCe keÀmes Heeefnpes? 8 Why was a Report Card needed and what does it contain? 9

Foreword 12 ÒemleeJevee 10

Acknowledgements 15 $eÝCeefveos&Me 14 Assessing the performance of Municipal Councillors objectively 17 veiejmesJekeÀeb®³ee keÀeceefiejer®es Jemlegefve<þ cetu³eceeHeve 16 Ranking Score Sheet 18 ¬eÀceJeejer iegCe leeefuekeÀe 18 Key Analysis 130 cegK³e efJeMues

keÀe³e&He×leer (1) Matrix – Scale of Ranking 158 (1) cetu³eceeHeve ceespeHeÆer 145 (2) Parameters for Past Records as per Affidavit 161 (2) De@HeÀer[sJnerì Üejs peenerj kesÀuesueer ceeieerue (YetlekeÀeueerve) ceeefnleer 148 (3) Parameters for Present Performance in the Corporation and Committee Meetings 162 (3) ceneveiejHeeefuekeÀe DeeefCe meefceleer yewþkeÀeleerue keÀeceieerjer mebyebOeer cetu³eceeHeve IeìkeÀ 149 (4) Parameters for People’s Perception as per Opinion Poll 165 (4) pevecele ®ee®eCeervegmeej ueeskeÀeb®eer celes/¢<ìerkeÀesve 152 (5) Parameters for Negative Marking 170 (5) vekeÀejelcekeÀ iegCeebkeÀvee®es IeìkeÀ 157

4 MUMBAI REPORT CARD MUNICIPAL COUNCILLORS 2015 5 ìerce THE TEAM

efJeve³e mebIeJeer Advisors Vinay Sanghi meuueeieej Entrepreneur GÐeespekeÀ Anuj Bhagwati Devegpe YeieJeleer Vivek Asrani efJeJeskeÀ Demejeveer Trustee, Praja Foundation; Entrepreneur GÐeespekeÀ Trustee, Praja Foundation; Entrepreneur mebmLeeHekeÀ efJeéemle, Òepee HeÀeTb[sMeve; GÐeespekeÀ Dr. C. R. Sridhar Market Research Professional [e@. meer. Deej. ÞeerOej Market Research Agency efJeHeCeve mebMeesOeve efJe

6 MUMBAI REPORT CARD MUNICIPAL COUNCILLORS 2015 7 Why was a Report Card needed and ueeskeÀÒeefleefveOeeR®es ÒeieleerHegmlekeÀ keÀe Heeefnpes DeeefCe keÀmes Heeefnpes? what does it contain?

DeeHeu³ee osMeeves mJeeleb$³eeHe½eele ÒeeefleefveefOekeÀ ueeskeÀMeener®eer keÀe³e&He×leer mJeerkeÀejueer. cnCetve Heb®ee³eleerHeemetve The People of India have had Elected Representatives representing them in mebmeosHe³e¥le meJe& mlejebJej ueeskeÀebveer efveJe[tve efouesues ueeskeÀÒeefleefveOeer l³eeb®es ÒeefleefveefOelJe keÀjleele. various bodies from the parliament to the panchayat for the last 60 years. These representatives have deliberated, debated, questioned, proposed Yeejleer³e mebefJeOeeveeves DeeKetve efouesu³ee ®eewkeÀìerle keÀece keÀjCes, ®e®ee& Je efJe®eejefJeefvece³e keÀjCes, veJes keÀe³eos new laws, passed new laws and governed the nation at all levels using the cebpetj keÀjCes DeeefCe osMee®ee keÀejYeej ®eeueJeCes ner ueeskeÀÒeefleefveOeeR®eer peyeeyeoejer Deens. Hejbleg iesu³ee leerve mechanisms given to them by the Constitution of India. The 1950 constitution which we gave to ourselves laid out the way in which we would govern oMekeÀebHeemetve DeeHeu³ee jep³ekeÀejYeeje®ee opee& KeeueeJele ®eeueuee Deens. ³ee®eer DeveskeÀefJeOe keÀejCes Deensle. ourselves. In the last three decades we have seen a steady decline in the l³eeHewkeÀer cenÊJee®eer oesve keÀejCes cnCepes jepekeÀejCee®es Jee{les J³eeHeejerkeÀjCe DeeefCe iegvnsieejerkeÀjCe. quality of governance due to various reasons, prime amongst them being commercialisation of politics and criminalisation of politics. This has created a jepekeÀejCee®es yeouele peeCeejs mJeªHe Deece pevelee cegkeÀeìHeCes Heenele Deens. DeeHeues mejkeÀej DeeefCe huge governance deficit in our country. ueeskeÀÒeefleefveOeer ³eeb®³eeJej®ee l³eeb®ee efJeéeeme G[le ®eeueuee Deens. The Electorate has remained a silent witness for most part of this and are feeling oj Hee®e Je

8 MUMBAI REPORT CARD MUNICIPAL COUNCILLORS 2015 9 ÒemleeJevee

2014 ceOeerue efveJe[CegkeÀeb®es DeveskeÀ efJeMes

10 MUMBAI REPORT CARD MUNICIPAL COUNCILLORS 2015 11 Foreword

The elections of 2014 was unique in many ways the most important On the positive side: there has been a slight improvement in quality of point was that for the first time the need of Good Governance was questions score from 47% in 2012-13 to 51% in 2014-15; awareness center stage . Political parties across the spectrum were debating and accessibility scores increased compared to 2013-14 from 35% about employment, economic policies, governance and youth, and not to 52% in 2014-15. so much about language, religion, caste. It was clear that the voters turned up for the promise of Good Governance above everything Sunita Yadav from BJP has topped the ranking with an overall score else. However, what happens in the ensuing five years will really test of 80.87%, while, Noshir Mehta and Ajanta Yadav from INC are ranked the mantle of our leaders and strengthen our democracy! no. 2 & 3 with 76.98% and 76.57% respectively. Average score of BJP (61.03%) is better than the rest, followed by SP (59.60%), NCP At Praja, we believe that continuously tracking the performance of our (59.56%), SS (59.17%), INC (58.41%) and MNS (54.34%) among the elected leaders through the “Report Card of Performance” will help larger parties in the corporation. However, the overall average scores keep the focus on Good Governance. have slightly fallen down to 58.09% in 2014-15 compared to 59.41% in 2013-14. This Report card also establishes the direct link between the work of the elected representative and the quality of Governance in Mumbai. As a non-partisan organisation we shall continue to bring out our High dropout rates of Students from the Municipal Schools, 21 deaths report card to rate performance of our elected representatives in the every day due to tuberculosis, rise in complaints of contaminated water hope that this leads to our political leaders adhering ideals enshrined these and more such issues are a clear indicator of poor governance in our Constitution. We hope such a barometer will contextualise the in the Municipal Corporation. The municipal councillors, fail to realise debate on Good Governance and nudge our political leaders and that they are the ones who are ultimately responsible for the in civic citizens a bit towards building a better governed Mumbai! governance of Mumbai. The strong verdicts against the incumbent governments in the General Election 2014, Maharashtra Assembly in 2014 and Delhi Assembly in 2015 are any indicators of the trend then the 2017 MCGM elections one may expect a similar strong verdict if this performance continues. Nitai Mehta, Managing Trustee, Praja Foundation The average attendance across all the committee meetings has come down to 68% in 2014-15 from 81% in 2012-13. In 817 meetings only 2727 questions were asked in 2014-15 a dismal average of only 3.3 questions a meeting. The scores for questions asked by councillors compared to citizen complaints remains low at 29% in 2014-15. Since elected in 2012, 30 councillors had fresh FIRs registered against them, while chargesheets were filed against 40 councillors.

12 MUMBAI REPORT CARD MUNICIPAL COUNCILLORS 2015 13 $eÝCeefveoxMe Acknowledgements

efJe®eejer DeeefCe DeeHeu³ee O³es³eeMeer ÒeeceeefCekeÀ DemeCeeN³ee veeieefjkeÀeb®ee uenevemee mecetn Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world; indeed, it’s the only thing that peie yeouet MekesÀue keÀe, DeMeer MebkeÀener ceveele DeeCet vekeÀe; keÀejCe DeepeJej kesÀJeU ever has. ³eecegUs®e yeoue Ie[uee Deens. – Margaret Mead – ceeiee&jsì ceer[ Change comes when people stand up and demand for it, and then strive to yeoue lesJne®e Ie[sue pesJne ueeskeÀ peeie=le nesleerue, ceeieCeer keÀjleerue DeeefCe leer HetCe& nesC³eemeeþer meJe&leesHejer get it. Today we are at that juncture of history where time demands that we stand up and demand that change and go and get it. Òe³elve keÀje³euee meppe nesleerue. Deepe DeeHeCe SkeÀe DeMee SsefleneefmekeÀ ìHH³eeJej GYes Deenesle, pesJne keÀeUe®eer DeeHeu³eekeÀ[tve ner®e ceeieCeer Deens ö yeoue Ie[JeC³eemeeþer Gþe, meppe Jne DeeefCe lees keÀªve oeKeJee. Individuals involved in developing this report card strongly believe that they cannot just wait and remain mute spectators when time is demanding Deepe®ee keÀeU DeeHeu³eekeÀ[tve keÀener þesme ke=Àleer®eer DeHes#ee keÀjCeeje keÀeU Deens. DeMee JesUer Meeble jentve action from them. All of them have come together to develop this report nesCeeN³ee Ieìveeb®es cetkeÀ mee#eeroej nesCes yejesyej veener. ³ee efJe®eejeves SkeÀ$e ³esTve Deecner keÀener ueeskeÀebveer ³ee card with an over-arching belief in the Constitution of India and the opportunity Òeieleer HegmlekeÀe®³ee keÀeceeuee meg©Jeele kesÀueer. Deece®ee Yeejlee®³ee jep³eIeìvesJej efJeéeeme Deens. v³ee³e, mJeeleb$³e, it creates for improved and efficient governance – the mean towards mecelee DeeefCe yebOeglJe ³ee Ieìvesves Ieeuetve efouesu³ee lelJeebvee meeO³e keÀjC³ee®eer meeOeves DeeHeu³ee IeìveelcekeÀ achieving the high ideals of the constitution – Justice, Liberty, Equality ®eewkeÀìerle®e GHeueyOe Deensle DeeefCe DeeHeu³eeuee DeeHeuee jep³ekeÀejYeej DeefOekeÀ ®eebieuee Je keÀe³e&#ece keÀjC³ee®eer and Fraternity. mebOeerner jep³eIeìvesletve GHeueyOe Deens, ³eeJej Deece®eer DeHeej Þe×e Deens. This book is a compilation of sincere, concerned efforts of the Core Praja Team. We would like to particularly appreciate the guidance of: D M Sukhtankar, ns HegmlekeÀ le³eej keÀjC³eeceO³es Òepee ìerce®³ee ceveëHetJe&keÀ kesÀuesu³ee keÀe³ee&®ee ceesþe Jeeìe Deens. keÀener J³ekeÌleeR®³ee Dr. C R Sridhar, KMS (Titoo) Ahluwalia and Dr. Suma Chitnis. And also to ceeie&oMe&vee®ee ³eeefþkeÀeCeer efJeMes

Narotam Sekhsaria Foundation Narotam Sekhsaria Foundation MADHU MEHTA FOUNDATION MADHU MEHTA FOUNDATION

14 MUMBAI REPORT CARD MUNICIPAL COUNCILLORS 2015 15 AssesSing the performance of veiejmesJekeÀeb®³ee keÀeceefiejer®es Jemlegefve<þ cetu³eceeHeve municipal councillors objectively

Yeejleele meO³ee jepekeÀer³e Heg{eN³eeb®³ee efJejesOeer pevecele le³eej Peeues Deens. HeCe Keje ÒeMve DeeHeCe ³ee The air in India is thick with criticism of politicians. The question that arises is: how can the performance of our elected representatives be assessed jepekeÀejCeer ueeskeÀeb®³ee keÀeceefiejer®es Jemlegefve<þ cetu³eceeHeve keÀmes keÀjCeej ne Deens. ³eemeeþer l³eebvee l³eeb®³ee objectively? Surely the right way cannot be by asking them for their opinion keÀeceeyeÎue keÀe³e Jeeìles ns efJe®eejCes Hegjsmes veener. efkebÀJee keÀener jepekeÀer³e le%e ceb[UeRvee cetu³eceeHeve keÀje³euee of themselves. Nor is it adequate to get a few political pundits (who may have meebieCesner ³eesi³e þjCeej veener (l³eeb®ee mJeleë®eener keÀener SkeÀ keÀue Demet MekeÀlees). their own angles) to evaluate them. HeejoMe&keÀ DeeefCe He×leMeerj mJeªHee®³ee DeY³eemeeletve ueeskeÀÒeefveOeeR®es meceleesue, HetJe&ûenefJejefnle DeeefCe The only way such an assessment can be done in a manner that is, and is efJeéeemeen& cetu³eceeHeve keÀjCes Meke̳e Deens. DeeefCe Demes cetu³eceeHeve keÀjCes ne Òepee Òeieleer HegmlekeÀe®³ee keÀecee®ee seen to be, unbiased and credible, is through a systematic and transparent nsleg Deens. study undertaken independently by respected professionals. That is precisely what The Praja Report Card seeks to accomplish. veiejmesJekeÀeb®es cetu³eceeHeve Heg{erue iees<ìeRJej DeeOeeefjle Deens. The ratings of the Municipal Councillors’s are based on: (De) ceneievejHeeefuekesÀ®³ee efJeefJeOe meefceleer yewþkeÀebvee GHeefmLeleer, efJe®eejuesu³ee ÒeMveeb®eer mebK³ee Je ÒekeÀej (a) Data accessed through RTI on attendance of different Committee Meetings veiejmesJekeÀ efveOeer®ee efJeefve³eesie Fl³eeoer ceeefnleer DeefOekeÀejeKeeueer efceUJeuesueer ceeefnleer. of the Municipal Corporation, number and type of questions raised, use of discretionary funds, etc. (bye) cegbyeF&leerue 22,850 veeieefjkeÀeb®³ee Jew³eefkeÌlekeÀ cegueeKeleer ö ³ee cegueeKeleer SkeÀe ceev³eJej (b) Personal interviews with 22,850 citizens of Mumbai conducted by a mebMeesOeve mebmLesves Iesleu³ee Demetve veeieefjkeÀeb®eer ueeskeÀÒeefleefveOeeRefJe

16 MUMBAI REPORT CARD MUNICIPAL COUNCILLORS 2015 17 Note: (1) Ranking of Sunil Vaman Prabhu(SS) for Constituency no. 48 is not available as he was Mayor till August 2014, similarly ranking of Snehal S. Ambekar(SS) for Constituency no. 194 is not available as she is Mayor from September 2014.

MUNICIPAL PARTY DETAILS COUNCILLOR Snehal S. Ambekar, Mayor, Mumbai

MUMBAI’S Age: 42 Edu.: B.Com Ward: G/South 227 COUNCILLORs Area: Parel – B.D.D. Chawls SS Ward No.: 194 AND THEIR (2) The ranking of Councillors for Constituency no. 30, 99 & 176 is not available as these councillors have been suspended, Vishwas Pandurang Ghadigaonkar (SS) is elected in RANKINGS place of Siraj Iliyas Shaikh (INC) for Constituency 30 and Ganga Kunal Mane (INC) in place of Anusha R. Kodam (SS) for Constituency no. 176. Khairunnisa Akbar Hussain (BSK) is elected in place of late Hanifa Bi for Constituency no. 135. (3) Priyanka S. Shrungare (MNS) for Constituency no. 112 was suspended from March 2014 to February 2015, hence she is not ranked. A (4) While reading the ratings of the councillors in the next pages kindly note the following: (A) The parameter indicating Quality of Questions is summation of scores for ‘Importance of questions asked by issues raised in the question’ (max. marks - 18) and ‘Issues raised compared to Citizen’s Complaints (max. marks - 10), while certain individual parameters (Discretionary Funds, Education Qualification, Income Tax, Awareness & Accessibility, Corruption Index and Broad Measures) are not shown separately. B (B) The grades are given based on actual percentage of marks earned for the particular parameter and are given as below: (a) Grade ‘A’ – Between 100% to 80% (b) Grade ‘B’ – Less than 80% but more than or equal to 70% (c) Grade ‘C’ – Less than 70% but more than or equal to 60% (d) Grade ‘D’ – Less than 60% but more than or equal to 50% E (e) Grade ‘E’ – Less than 50% but more than or equal to 35% C (f) Grade ‘F’ – Less than 35%. F (C) Every Municipal Councillor is a member of BMC General Body and their respective Ward Committee. (D) Shift: denotes reason of major movement in ranks from 2014 to 2015. D (5) Note (*): Till, 2014 number of questions asked had 15 marks which from 2015 has been reduced to 10 marks and 'Participation in Discussions' in the corporation meetings has been included as a new parameter.

18 MUMBAI REPORT CARD MUNICIPAL COUNCILLORS 2015 19 NO. OF QUALITY OF LEAST CRIMINAL PERCEIVED TOTAL ATTENDANCE MUNICIPAL QUESTIONS QUESTIONS RECORD PERFORMANCE PARTY GRADE SCORE RANK COUNCILLOR Actual Actual * Actual Actual Actual % Grade Grade Grade Grade Grade out of 15 out of 10 out of 28 out of 5 out of 30

67.25 9.40 9.68 16.22 5 21.96 2015 C 52 C A D A B

SS B 74.10 15 B 11.13 A 14.27 B 22.27 A 5 E 14.44 2014

Abhishek Age: 32 yrs, Edu.: HSC, Maharashtra Board Technical Education Member: Works Committee (Suburbs), Shift: Attendance; No. of questions; V. Ghosalkar Ward: R/North, Area: Kandarpada - I. C. Colony, Constituency No.: 1 Ward Committee R/Central and R/North Quality of questions

73.51 12.02 9.31 15.92 5 22.55 2015 B 13 A A D A B

SS B 70.70 30 A 12.81 A 13.01 C 17.03 A 5 D 15.84 2014

Sheetal Age: 41 yrs, Edu.: B.A., Public Relation and Journalism Member: Public Health Committee, M. Mhatre Ward: R/North, Area: Gaondevi - Dahisar (E), Constituency No.: 2 Ward Committee R/Central and R/North

55.86 7.33 6.39 16.18 -5 21.53 2015 D 132 E C D F B

INC D 54.40 154 C 9.75 D 8.16 C 19.29 F -5 D 15.20 2014

Sheetal A. Age: 37 yrs, Edu.: Bachelor of Architecture Member: Women and Child Welfare Committee, Ward Mhatre (Kulkarni) Ward: R/North, Area: Ketkipada - Shailendra Nagar, Constituency No.: 3 Committee R/Central and R/North, Standing Committee

53.26 12.18 1.73 18.60 -7 18.31 2015 D 156 A F C F C

SS D 55.70 149 A 12.72 A 12.47 D 15.72 F -7 E 14.79 2014

Udesh Age: 47 yrs, Edu.: S.Y.B.Com. Member: Law, Revenue and General Purposes Committee, S. Patekar Ward: R/North, Area: Vaishali Nagar, Constituency No.: 4 Ward Committee R/Central and R/North

20 MUMBAI REPORT CARD MUNICIPAL COUNCILLORS 2015 21 NO. OF QUALITY OF LEAST CRIMINAL PERCEIVED TOTAL ATTENDANCE MUNICIPAL QUESTIONS QUESTIONS RECORD PERFORMANCE PARTY GRADE SCORE RANK COUNCILLOR Actual Actual * Actual Actual Actual % Grade Grade Grade Grade Grade out of 15 out of 10 out of 28 out of 5 out of 30

55.66 9.29 3.10 15.48 -5 21.07 2015 D 134 C F D F B

MNS D 50.13 184 B 11.40 D 8.49 E 12.18 F -5 D 16.06 2014

Prakash Age: 43 yrs, Edu.: B. Com, Journalism Certificate Course Member: Law, Revenue and General Purposes Committee, Shift: Quality of questions; Perceived Y. Darekar Ward: R/North, Area: Ashokvan - Chintamani Nagar, Constituency No.: 5 Ward Committee R/Central and R/North, Education Committee Performance

47.85 11.42 1.65 3.00 5 23.38 2015 E 183 B F F A B

SS D 57.50 136 A 13.56 F 1.05 D 15.18 A 5 D 15.10 2014

Hansaben Age: 73 yrs, Edu.: B.Sc., B.Ed. Member: Women and Child Welfare Committee, Ward Shift: Attendance; Quality of questions G. Desai Ward: R/North, Area: Ambawadi - Ovari Pada, Constituency No.: 6 Committee R/Central and R/North, Education Committee

63.47 7.26 8.26 11.63 5 21.85 2015 C 82 E A E A B

SS C 68.89 47 A 12.24 A 14.27 D 15.69 A 5 D 15.69 2014 Member: Public Health Committee, Ward Committee Shubha Age: 48 yrs, Edu.: B.A.M.S., M.D. Ayurveda Shift: Attendance; No. of questions; R/Central and R/North, Improvements Committee, Ward: R/North, Area: Mandapeshwar, Constituency No.: 7 Quality of questions U. Raul Tree Committee

55.13 11.45 1.73 13.82 5 22.13 2015 D 140 B F E A B

INC D 57.13 137 B 11.43 F 4.31 E 13.70 A 5 D 16.70 2014

Shivanand Age: 42 yrs, Edu.: Upto SSC Member: Markets and Gardens Committee, Ward Committee Shetty Ward: R/Central, Area: Gorai - M.H.B. Colony (Old), Constituency No.: 8 R/Central and R/North, Education Committee

22 MUMBAI REPORT CARD MUNICIPAL COUNCILLORS 2015 23 NO. OF QUALITY OF LEAST CRIMINAL PERCEIVED TOTAL ATTENDANCE MUNICIPAL QUESTIONS QUESTIONS RECORD PERFORMANCE PARTY GRADE SCORE RANK COUNCILLOR Actual Actual * Actual Actual Actual % Grade Grade Grade Grade Grade out of 15 out of 10 out of 28 out of 5 out of 30

67.91 8.23 9.54 20.09 5 18.35 2015 C 48 D A B A C

BJP B 75.64 8 A 14.20 A 14.46 B 19.83 A 5 D 15.15 2014

Manisha Age: 53 yrs, Edu.: B.Sc. Member: Works Committee (Suburbs), Ward Committee Shift: Attendance; No. of questions A. Chaudhari Ward: R/Central, Area: Govind Nagar, Constituency No.: 9 R/Central and R/North, Tree Committee

54.76 9.75 7.12 13.74 5 17.15 2015 D 143 C B E A D

NCP C 60.77 112 D 8.72 B 11.61 E 13.69 A 5 E 14.75 2014

Riddhi Age: 31 yrs, Edu.: HSC Member: Markets and Gardens Committee, Women and Child Shift: No. of questions B. Khursange Ward: R/Central, Area: Daulat Nagar, Nancy Colony, Constituency No.: 10 Welfare Committee, Ward Committee R/Central and R/North

57.41 11.08 4.70 16.79 5 16.40 2015 D 117 B E D A D

MNS C 69.00 45 B 11.99 D 8.49 B 21.96 A 5 D 15.56 2014

Shilpa Age: 57 yrs, Edu.: Seventh, Ward: R/Central Member: Works Committee (Suburbs), Ward Committee Shift: No. of questions; Quality of S. Chogle Area: Bansi Nagar - Tata Power House, Constituency No.: 11 R/Central and R/North questions

61.19 11.48 5.29 16.01 5 17.55 2015 C 98 B D D A D

BJP C 61.61 103 A 13.96 D 8.96 E 13.64 A 5 E 14.33 2014

Asawari Age: 57 yrs, Edu.: HSC Member: Women and Child Welfare Committee, A. Patil Ward: R/Central, Area: Datta Pada, Constituency No.: 12 Ward Committee R/Central and R/North

24 MUMBAI REPORT CARD MUNICIPAL COUNCILLORS 2015 25 NO. OF QUALITY OF LEAST CRIMINAL PERCEIVED TOTAL ATTENDANCE MUNICIPAL QUESTIONS QUESTIONS RECORD PERFORMANCE PARTY GRADE SCORE RANK COUNCILLOR Actual Actual * Actual Actual Actual % Grade Grade Grade Grade Grade out of 15 out of 10 out of 28 out of 5 out of 30

66.30 10.41 6.52 22.05 0 19.17 2015 C 58 C C B F C

MNS D 51.63 176 E 7.41 F 4.31 C 17.39 F 0 D 16.52 2014 Shift: Attendance; No. of questions; Chetan Age: 41 yrs, Edu.: HSC, Ward: R/Central Member: Ward Committee R/Central and R/North, Quality of questions; Perceived Area: Rajendra Nagar, Khatav Estate, Constituency No.: 13 Improvements Committee C. Kadam Performance

58.69 12.76 1.73 18.51 5 18.69 2015 D 110 A F C A C

BJP C 67.35 60 A 14.03 B 10.74 D 16.53 A 5 E 14.05 2014

Bina Age: 53 yrs, Edu.: SSC Member: Women and Child Welfare Committee, Shift: Attendance; No. of questions P. Doshi Ward: R/Central, Area: Borivali TPS 3 - Kora Kendra, Constituency No.: 14 Ward Committee R/Central and R/North

49.28 9.75 2.51 11.71 0 19.85 2015 E 176 C F E F C

BJP D 55.71 148 D 8.30 D 7.62 C 18.35 F 0 E 14.43 2014

Mohan Age: 68 yrs, Edu.: B.A. (Economics), B.Com. Shift: No. of questions; Quality of Member: Ward Committee R/Central and R/North R. Mithbaokar Ward: R/Central, Area: Eksar - Yogi Nagar, Constituency No.: 15 questions

61.75 11.70 3.10 18.21 0 20.27 2015 C 95 B F C F C

BJP D 53.93 157 A 13.28 F 3.45 D 15.98 F 0 E 14.22 2014

Pravin Age: 59 yrs, Edu.: SSC Member: Markets and Gardens Committee, Ward Committee Shift: Attendance; Quality of questions; Shah Ward: R/Central, Area: Chikuwadi - Kanti Park, Constituency No.: 16 R/Central and R/North Perceived Performance

26 MUMBAI REPORT CARD MUNICIPAL COUNCILLORS 2015 27 NO. OF QUALITY OF LEAST CRIMINAL PERCEIVED TOTAL ATTENDANCE MUNICIPAL QUESTIONS QUESTIONS RECORD PERFORMANCE PARTY GRADE SCORE RANK COUNCILLOR Actual Actual * Actual Actual Actual % Grade Grade Grade Grade Grade out of 15 out of 10 out of 28 out of 5 out of 30

60.36 13.34 8.72 10.05 5 18.81 2015 C 104 A A E A C

NCP C 66.96 64 A 13.78 A 12.00 D 15.27 A 5 E 14.90 2014 Member: Markets and Gardens Committee, Women and Child Sandhya Age: 39 yrs, Edu.: B.Com. (Part 2), Ward: R/Central Shift: No. of questions; Quality of Welfare Committee, Ward Committee R/Central and R/North, Area: Charkop (North), M.H.B. Colony (New), Constituency No.: 17 questions V. Doshi Improvements Committee

72.31 13.72 6.52 15.29 5 20.35 2015 B 18 A C D A C

SS C 68.35 50 A 14.89 C 9.42 E 13.12 A 5 C 18.92 2014

Shrikant Age: 58 yrs, Edu.: F.Y.B.Com, Ward: R/South Member: Markets and Gardens Committee, BEST Committee, K. Kavathankar Area: Charkop (South) - Kandivali (West), Constituency No.: 18 Ward Committee R/South

48.74 11.88 2.51 6.07 5 17.29 2015 E 178 B F F A D

INC C 60.84 111 B 11.07 E 6.11 D 14.16 A 5 C 18.51 2014

Neha Age: 26 yrs, Edu.: B.M.S., M.M.S. Part 2 (Appeared) Member: Works Committee (Suburbs), Shift: No. of questions; Quality of V. Patil Ward: R/South, Area: Charkop-Industrial Estate, Constituency No.: 19 Ward Committee R/South questions

65.29 9.14 5.84 20.21 5 20.66 2015 C 68 C D B A C

BJP C 67.75 54 D 8.14 A 12.80 C 18.07 A 5 D 16.74 2014

Shailaja Age: 59 yrs, Edu.: Eleventh Member: Public Health Committee, Ward Committee R/South, V. Girkar Ward: R/South, Area: Mahavir Nagar - Dhanukar Wadi, Constituency No.: 20 Tree Committee

28 MUMBAI REPORT CARD MUNICIPAL COUNCILLORS 2015 29 NO. OF QUALITY OF LEAST CRIMINAL PERCEIVED TOTAL ATTENDANCE MUNICIPAL QUESTIONS QUESTIONS RECORD PERFORMANCE PARTY GRADE SCORE RANK COUNCILLOR Actual Actual * Actual Actual Actual % Grade Grade Grade Grade Grade out of 15 out of 10 out of 28 out of 5 out of 30

73.73 12.69 9.90 17.30 5 20.40 2015 B 12 A A C A C

INC B 76.98 4 A 14.46 A 13.67 C 18.55 A 5 C 18.30 2014

Ramashish Age: 50 yrs, Edu.: B.Com, Ward: R/South, Area: Narwane Sanskrutik Centre - Member: Markets and Gardens Committee, G. Gupta Aarya Chanakya Nagar, Constituency No.: 21 Ward Committee R/South

80.87 14.10 7.99 18.55 5 24.76 2015 A 1 A B C A A

BJP B 75.92 6 A 13.24 B 11.61 C 19.45 A 5 C 19.63 2014

Sunita Age: 44 yrs, Edu.: HSC, Ward: R/South Member: Public Health Committee, Ward Committee R/South R. Yadav Area: Poisar Village (West) - Kandivali (East), Constituency No.: 22

69.07 9.01 9.45 18.32 5 17.85 2015 C 42 C A C A D

SS B 75.75 7 C 10.35 A 13.34 B 20.41 A 5 C 19.65 2014

Prajakta V. (Sawant) Age: 30 yrs, Edu.: F.Y.B.Com, Ward: R/South Shift: No. of questions; Quality of Member: Ward Committee R/South Vishwasrao Area: Poisar (East), Rajaram Nagar - Ashok Nagar, Constituency No.: 23 questions; Perceived Performance

61.89 10.95 6.84 20.71 -5 21.38 2015 C 92 B C B F B

INC B 72.48 24 B 11.21 A 13.80 B 21.19 F 0 C 19.27 2014

Yogesh Age: 36 yrs, Edu.: T.Y.B.Com, Ward: R/South, Area: Samata Nagar - Member: Public Health Committee, Ward Committee R/South Shift: No. of questions; New FIR J. Bhoir Dattani Park - Mahindra & Mahindra Company, Constituency No.: 24

30 MUMBAI REPORT CARD MUNICIPAL COUNCILLORS 2015 31 NO. OF QUALITY OF LEAST CRIMINAL PERCEIVED TOTAL ATTENDANCE MUNICIPAL QUESTIONS QUESTIONS RECORD PERFORMANCE PARTY GRADE SCORE RANK COUNCILLOR Actual Actual * Actual Actual Actual % Grade Grade Grade Grade Grade out of 15 out of 10 out of 28 out of 5 out of 30

76.57 10.29 9.72 19.99 5 21.08 2015 B 3 C A B A B

INC B 71.59 29 A 12.48 A 14.66 C 17.81 A 5 D 15.64 2014

Ajanta Age: 48 yrs, Edu.: B.H.M.S. Member: Education Committee, Public Health Committee, Shift: No. of questions; Quality of R. Yadav Ward: R/South, Area: Damupada, Constituency No.: 25 Ward Committee R/South questions; Perceived Performance

57.01 8.81 4.10 15.15 0 19.51 2015 D 121 D E D F C

INC D 55.96 146 D 7.96 B 10.74 E 13.56 F 0 D 16.70 2014

Sagar Age: 26 yrs, Edu.: B.Com, M.B.A. (Appeared), Ward: R/South Member: Works Committee (Suburbs), S. Thakur Area: Vadarpada Colony - Gautam Nagar, Constituency No.: 26 Ward Committee R/South

54.82 11.59 1.05 10.28 5 22.90 2015 D 142 B F E A B

BJP D 54.56 153 A 14.41 F 1.65 E 10.26 A 5 D 16.24 2014

Mukeshkumar Age: 56 yrs, Edu.: SSC, Ward: R/South Member: Markets and Gardens Committee, Mistry Area: Devji Bhimji Colony - Paras Nagar, Constituency No.: 27 Ward Committee R/South

61.84 12.89 5.29 17.44 0 19.77 2015 C 93 A D C F C

INC C 66.93 66 B 11.93 C 10.22 C 19.23 F 0 C 18.56 2014

Geeta Age: 39 yrs, Edu.: D.H.M.S. Member: Improvements Committee, Shift: No. of questions; Quality of A. Yadav Ward: R/South, Area: Irani Wadi - Kandivali (W), Constituency No.: 28 Ward Committee R/South questions

32 MUMBAI REPORT CARD MUNICIPAL COUNCILLORS 2015 33 NO. OF QUALITY OF LEAST CRIMINAL PERCEIVED TOTAL ATTENDANCE MUNICIPAL QUESTIONS QUESTIONS RECORD PERFORMANCE PARTY GRADE SCORE RANK COUNCILLOR Actual Actual * Actual Actual Actual % Grade Grade Grade Grade Grade out of 15 out of 10 out of 28 out of 5 out of 30

74.08 13.55 9.22 17.15 5 20.70 2015 B 11 A A C A C

SS C 69.08 44 A 13.21 A 12.35 D 15.10 A 5 D 16.43 2014

Ajit Age: 51 yrs, Edu.: HSC, Ward: P/North, Area: Manori Marve, Member: Markets and Gardens Committee, Shift: No. of questions; Quality of D. Bhandari Erangel, Akse, Daravali Village, , Constituency No.: 29 Ward Committee P/North questions; Perceived Performance

66.39 9.34 9.86 15.63 5 20.56 2015 C 56 C A D A C

INC C 69.58 39 B 11.17 A 13.01 D 16.01 A 5 D 17.39 2014

Parminder Age: 49 yrs, Edu.: HSC, Ward: P/North Member: Public Health Committee, Tree Committee, Ward R. Bhamra Area: Adarsh Dugdhalaya - Evershine Nagar, Constituency No.: 31 Committee P/North

51.59 11.04 1.73 10.39 5 18.43 2015 D 163 B F E A C

SS D 50.60 182 A 12.92 F 1.65 F 6.00 A 5 C 18.03 2014

Anagha Age: 64 yrs, Edu.: SSC, Ward: P/North Member: Works Committee (Suburbs), Ward Committee P. Mhatre Area: Bhadaran Nagar - Mamaledar Wadi, Constituency No.: 32 P/North, Standing Committee

55.15 9.61 5.84 11.41 5 19.28 2015 D 138 C D E A C

BJP C 63.23 91 A 12.46 D 8.96 E 11.86 A 5 C 18.96 2014

Ramnarayan Age: 69 yrs, Edu.: L.C.E.H. (Mumbai) Member: Public Health Committee, Ward Committee P/North, Shift: Attendance; No. of questions A. Barot Ward: P/North, Area: Pushpa Park, Constituency No.: 33 Improvements Committee

34 MUMBAI REPORT CARD MUNICIPAL COUNCILLORS 2015 35 NO. OF QUALITY OF LEAST CRIMINAL PERCEIVED TOTAL ATTENDANCE MUNICIPAL QUESTIONS QUESTIONS RECORD PERFORMANCE PARTY GRADE SCORE RANK COUNCILLOR Actual Actual * Actual Actual Actual % Grade Grade Grade Grade Grade out of 15 out of 10 out of 28 out of 5 out of 30

68.97 14.09 3.10 20.68 5 17.66 2015 C 43 A F B A D

SS C 64.10 80 A 13.97 F 3.45 C 17.62 A 5 D 17.06 2014

Sunil Age: 52 yrs, Edu.: SSC Member: Law, Revenue and General Purposes Committee, D. Gujar Ward: P/North, Area: Tanaji Nagar, Constituency No.: 34 Ward Committee P/North

47.85 6.08 1.05 14.91 3 17.81 2015 E 184 E F D C D

INC F 33.36 220 E 5.98 F 0.00 F 0.00 C 3 D 17.38 2014

Bhomsingh Age: 58 yrs, Edu.: Matriculation Member: Law, Revenue and General Purposes Committee, Shift: No. of questions; Quality of H. Rathod Ward: P/North, Area: Appa Pada, Constituency No.: 35 Standing Committee, Ward Committee P/North questions

62.90 12.55 2.51 14.83 3 20.57 2015 C 87 A F D C C

SS E 49.42 190 B 11.93 F 5.04 F 6.57 C 3 D 16.88 2014

Prashant Age: 39 yrs, Edu.: Upto Twelfth Shift: Quality of questions; Perceived Member: Public Health Committee, Ward Committee P/North D. Kadam Ward: P/North, Area: Malad Hill Reservoir, Constituency No.: 36 Performance

32.87 4.18 0.00 0.00 5 18.69 2015 F 214 F F F A C

SS E 43.27 209 C 10.15 F 0.72 F 6.04 A 5 D 16.37 2014

Manisha Age: 42 yrs, Edu.: Fifth Member: Women and Child Welfare Committee, Shift: Attendance; Quality of questions S. Patil Ward: P/North, Area: Municipal colony Malad (East), Constituency No.: 37 Ward Committee P/North

36 MUMBAI REPORT CARD MUNICIPAL COUNCILLORS 2015 37 NO. OF QUALITY OF LEAST CRIMINAL PERCEIVED TOTAL ATTENDANCE MUNICIPAL QUESTIONS QUESTIONS RECORD PERFORMANCE PARTY GRADE SCORE RANK COUNCILLOR Actual Actual * Actual Actual Actual % Grade Grade Grade Grade Grade out of 15 out of 10 out of 28 out of 5 out of 30

60.65 5.63 3.10 16.94 5 20.51 2015 C 101 E F C A C

NCP C 61.23 109 C 9.62 C 9.42 E 12.75 A 5 D 17.45 2014

Rupali Age: 34 yrs, Edu.: HSC, Ward: P/North Member: Ward Committee P/North A. Raorane Area: Dhanjiwadi - Narsobawadi - Kokanipada, Constituency No.: 38

65.03 14.32 4.10 18.43 5 19.17 2015 C 72 A E C A C

SS D 52.85 165 A 14.78 F 0.72 F 6.57 A 5 C 18.78 2014

Sayali Age: 36 yrs, Edu.: B.Com Member: Law, Revenue and General Purposes Committee, Shift: No. of questions; Quality of S. Warise Ward: P/North, Area: Pimpri Pada - Pathanwadi, Constituency No.: 39 Ward Committee P/North questions

75.73 13.95 9.04 19.54 5 18.04 2015 B 5 A A C A C

BJP B 77.97 3 A 13.60 A 14.46 C 18.31 A 5 C 19.59 2014

Gyanmurti Age: 43 yrs, Edu.: B.Sc., L.L.B. Member: Law, Revenue and General Purposes Committee, R. Sharma Ward: P/North, Area: Raheja Complex - Dindoshi, Constituency No.: 40 Ward Committee P/North

58.36 8.73 6.52 16.78 0 18.48 2015 D 112 D C D F C

BJP C 69.89 35 B 10.61 A 13.47 D 15.39 A 5 C 18.43 2014 Member: Law, Revenue and General Purposes Committee, Vinod Age: 44 yrs, Edu.: D.M.E. Shift: Attendance; No. of questions; Standing Committee, Ward Committee P/North, Education Ward: P/North, Area: Makrani Pada, Constituency No.: 41 New FIR B. Shelar Committee

38 MUMBAI REPORT CARD MUNICIPAL COUNCILLORS 2015 39 NO. OF QUALITY OF LEAST CRIMINAL PERCEIVED TOTAL ATTENDANCE MUNICIPAL QUESTIONS QUESTIONS RECORD PERFORMANCE PARTY GRADE SCORE RANK COUNCILLOR Actual Actual * Actual Actual Actual % Grade Grade Grade Grade Grade out of 15 out of 10 out of 28 out of 5 out of 30

50.67 3.67 9.95 16.22 0 16.83 2015 D 170 F A D F D

MNS C 66.74 67 D 8.57 A 14.87 C 19.53 F 0 D 17.77 2014 Shift: Attendance; No. of questions; Deepak Age: 46 yrs, Edu.: Eighth, Ward: P/North Member: Works Committee (Suburbs), Markets and Gardens Quality of questions; Perceived Area: Liberty Garden - Nadiyadwalla Colony, Constituency No.: 42 Committee, Ward Committee P/North, Improvements Committee P. Pawar Performance

56.02 9.61 4.10 11.28 5 17.60 2015 D 129 C E E A D

INC D 55.51 150 B 11.31 F 5.04 E 12.73 A 5 D 15.43 2014

Qumarjahan Age: 49 yrs, Edu.: SSC Member: Markets and Gardens Committee, Mohd. Moin Siddiqi Ward: P/North, Area: New Collectors Colony, Constituency No.: 43 Ward Committee P/North

53.40 7.76 5.84 14.51 5 15.29

2015 D D D A D INDEPENDENT D 153

D 56.10 144 D 7.98 F 5.04 D 15.81 A 5 D 16.27 2014

Cyril Age: 42 yrs, Edu.: Fourth, Ward: P/North Member: Ward Committee P/North, Tree Committee P. D’souza Area: New Collectors Compound, M.H.B. Colony, Constituency No.: 44

D 57.99 7.62 5.29 14.93 5 20.16 2015 115 D D D A C

INC B 72.27 25 A 12.53 D 8.49 A 22.42 A 5 D 17.83 2014

Sneha Age: 25 yrs, Edu.: S.Y.B.Com (Appeared) Member: Women and Child Welfare Committee, Shift: Attendance; No. of questions; V. Zagade Ward: P/South, Area: Sunder Nagar - Piramal Nagar, Constituency No.: 45 Ward Committee P/South Quality of questions

40 MUMBAI REPORT CARD MUNICIPAL COUNCILLORS 2015 41 NO. OF QUALITY OF LEAST CRIMINAL PERCEIVED TOTAL ATTENDANCE MUNICIPAL QUESTIONS QUESTIONS RECORD PERFORMANCE PARTY GRADE SCORE RANK COUNCILLOR Actual Actual * Actual Actual Actual % Grade Grade Grade Grade Grade out of 15 out of 10 out of 28 out of 5 out of 30

65.25 12.67 4.97 12.93 5 19.53 2015 C 70 A E E A C

SS B 70.41 31 A 14.06 C 9.42 C 17.86 A 5 C 18.07 2014

Varsha Age: 40 yrs, Edu.: T.Y.B.Com Member: Works Committee (Suburbs), Shift: Attendance; No. of questions; S. Tembvalkar Ward: P/South, Area: Dindoshi - Pandurangwadi, Constituency No.: 46 Ward Committee P/South Quality of questions

70.82 11.46 5.29 20.72 5 21.35 2015 B 32 B D B A B

SS D 55.32 151 A 12.39 F 3.45 E 10.79 A 5 D 17.70 2014

Jitendra Age: 36 yrs, Edu.: HSC Member: Law, Revenue and General Purposes Committee, Shift: No. of questions; Quality of H. Valvi Ward: P/South, Area: Aarey Colony (East), Constituency No.: 47 Ward Committee P/South questions; Perceived Performance

57.11 9.13 5.29 20.40 -5 18.44 2015 D 120 C D B F C

SS D 55.99 145 C 9.52 D 7.62 B 19.64 F -5 C 18.21 2014

Lochana Age: 48 yrs, Edu.: Upto SSC, Ward: P/South Member: Works Committee (Suburbs), Women and Child C. Chavan Area: Unnat Nagar - Motilal Nagar No. 2 & 3, Constituency No.: 49 Welfare Committee, Ward Committee P/South

50.08 12.23 4.70 18.41 -10 18.75 2015 D 172 A E C F C

SS D 52.27 172 A 12.77 E 6.11 D 15.19 F -5 D 16.21 2014

Rajan Age: 51 yrs, Edu.: HSC Member: Works Committee (Suburbs), Ward Committee V. Padhye Ward: P/South, Area: Shastri Nagar- Bangur Nagar, Constituency No.: 50 P/South, Improvements Committee

42 MUMBAI REPORT CARD MUNICIPAL COUNCILLORS 2015 43 NO. OF QUALITY OF LEAST CRIMINAL PERCEIVED TOTAL ATTENDANCE MUNICIPAL QUESTIONS QUESTIONS RECORD PERFORMANCE PARTY GRADE SCORE RANK COUNCILLOR Actual Actual * Actual Actual Actual % Grade Grade Grade Grade Grade out of 15 out of 10 out of 28 out of 5 out of 30

72.44 11.28 8.17 17.89 5 19.78 2015 B 17 B A C A C

SS D 59.27 124 A 13.92 D 7.62 F 8.07 A 5 D 17.66 2014

Pramila Age: 45 yrs, Edu.: SSC, Ward: P/South Shift: Attendance; Quality of questions; Member: Public Health Committee, Ward Committee P/South D. Shinde Area: Motilal Nagar No.1 - B.E.S.T. Bus Depot, Constituency No.: 51 Perceived Performance

58.33 10.63 3.60 13.41 5 18.69 2015 D 113 B E E A C

INC C 66.40 72 A 12.78 F 5.04 C 18.09 A 5 C 18.49 2014

Kiran Age: 47 yrs, Edu.: B.A. Member: Women and Child Welfare Committee, Shift: Attendance; No. of questions; V. Patel Ward: P/South, Area: Siddharth Nagar - Jawahar Nagar, Constituency No.: 52 Ward Committee P/South Quality of questions

27.88 4.75 0.00 0.00 -5 23.13

2015 F F F F B Independent F 219

E 36.56 217 D 8.60 F 0.00 F 0.00 A 5 D 15.96 2014

Changez Age: 47 yrs, Edu.: SSC Member: Law, Revenue and General Purposes Committee, Shift: Attendance, New FIR J. Multani Ward: K/West, Area: - Bandivli (East), Constituency No.: 53 Ward Committee K/West

63.44 12.07 5.84 19.17 -5 21.05 2015 C 83 A D C F B

SS D 58.22 129 C 10.28 A 12.47 C 17.33 F -5 D 16.14 2014

Raju Age: 49 yrs, Edu.: HSC Member: Law, Revenue and General Purposes Committee, Shift: Attendance; Quality of questions; S. Pednekar Ward: K/West, Area: Tarapore Garden - Adarsh Nagar, Constituency No.: 54 Ward Committee K/West, Improvements Committee Perceived Performance

44 MUMBAI REPORT CARD MUNICIPAL COUNCILLORS 2015 45 NO. OF QUALITY OF LEAST CRIMINAL PERCEIVED TOTAL ATTENDANCE MUNICIPAL QUESTIONS QUESTIONS RECORD PERFORMANCE PARTY GRADE SCORE RANK COUNCILLOR Actual Actual * Actual Actual Actual % Grade Grade Grade Grade Grade out of 15 out of 10 out of 28 out of 5 out of 30

65.32 12.87 7.80 17.31 5 17.35 2015 C 66 A B C A D

INC C 64.06 82 A 12.78 E 7.16 D 16.45 A 5 D 16.67 2014

Jyotsna Age: 61 yrs, Edu.: Post Graduate Member: Law, Revenue and General Purposes Committee, A. Dighe Ward: K/West, Area: Swami Samarth Nagar, Constituency No.: 55 Ward Committee K/West, Improvements Committee

69.48 12.44 8.26 14.16 5 18.99 2015 C 40 A A D A C

SS B 75.41 10 A 14.70 A 14.79 C 18.03 A 5 D 16.90 2014

Yashodhar Age: 52 yrs, Edu.: B.A. Member: Ward Committee K/West, BEST Committee, Shift: Attendance; No. of questions; P. Phanse Ward: K/West, Area: Versova (North), Constituency No.: 56 Standing Committee, Tree Committee Quality of questions

71.66 10.35 9.49 17.63 5 19.26 2015 B 24 C A C A C

INC D 54.96 152 B 10.97 F 4.31 E 10.90 A 5 D 17.78 2014

Devendra Age: 51 yrs, Edu.: B.A. Member: Ward Committee K/West, Standing Committee, Shift: No. of questions; Quality of S. Amberkar Ward: K/West, Area: Amboli Hill, Constituency No.: 57 Tree Committee questions; Perceived Performance

64.25 14.22 5.29 14.71 5 19.02 2015 C 78 A D D A C

SS C 63.28 90 A 14.41 E 6.11 D 14.26 A 5 D 16.50 2014

Jyoti Age: 53 yrs, Edu.: HSC, Ward: K/West Member: Women and Child Welfare Committee, J. Sutar Area: Sahaji Raje Sports Complex - Malcolm Baug, Constituency No.: 58 Ward Committee K/West

46 MUMBAI REPORT CARD MUNICIPAL COUNCILLORS 2015 47 NO. OF QUALITY OF LEAST CRIMINAL PERCEIVED TOTAL ATTENDANCE MUNICIPAL QUESTIONS QUESTIONS RECORD PERFORMANCE PARTY GRADE SCORE RANK COUNCILLOR Actual Actual * Actual Actual Actual % Grade Grade Grade Grade Grade out of 15 out of 10 out of 28 out of 5 out of 30

55.74 9.42 4.10 10.75 5 18.04 2015 D 133 C E E A C

INC D 59.85 120 A 13.54 D 8.96 F 8.81 A 5 D 17.54 2014

Vanita Age: 53 yrs, Edu.: HSC, Ward: K/West Member: Women and Child Welfare Committee, K. Marucha Area: Seven Bunglow - Versova (South), Constituency No.: 59 Ward Committee K/West, Education Committee

75.02 14.04 8.26 20.91 5 17.95 2015 B 7 A A B A D

SS B 76.38 5 A 14.73 A 13.01 C 18.55 A 5 C 18.09 2014

Sanjay Age: 48 yrs, Edu.: HSC Member: Works Committee (Suburbs), K. Pawar Ward: K/West, Area: Manish Nagar - Bhavan’s College, Constituency No.: 60 Ward Committee K/West

70.64 11.73 9.22 20.18 -5 23.53 2015 B 33 B A B F B

INC C 63.65 87 A 12.99 A 14.07 C 18.72 F -5 D 15.88 2014

Mohsin Age: 46 yrs, Edu.: B.Com Member: Works Committee (Suburbs), Shift: Quality of questions; Perceived H. Haider Ward: K/West, Area: - Market, Constituency No.: 61 Ward Committee K/West, Improvements Committee Performance

53.34 6.02 2.51 15.50 5 16.45 2015 D 154 E F D A D

BJP C 67.23 61 A 13.50 D 8.96 D 15.95 A 5 D 16.82 2014

Ameet Age: 38 yrs, Edu.: M.M.S., Ward: K/West Member: Markets and Gardens Committee, Ward Committee Shift: Attendance; No. of questions B. Satam Area: Lallubhai Park - Shri Ram Zarokha, Constituency No.: 62 K/West, Tree Committee, Standing Committee

48 MUMBAI REPORT CARD MUNICIPAL COUNCILLORS 2015 49 NO. OF QUALITY OF LEAST CRIMINAL PERCEIVED TOTAL ATTENDANCE MUNICIPAL QUESTIONS QUESTIONS RECORD PERFORMANCE PARTY GRADE SCORE RANK COUNCILLOR Actual Actual * Actual Actual Actual % Grade Grade Grade Grade Grade out of 15 out of 10 out of 28 out of 5 out of 30

66.92 10.75 7.53 15.78 5 21.36 2015 C 54 B B D A B

BJP C 69.77 36 A 13.53 A 14.19 D 15.29 A 5 D 15.76 2014

Dilip Age: 63 yrs, Edu.: HSC, Ward: K/West Member: Ward Committee K/West, Standing Committee G. Patel Area: Bhakti Vedanta Marg - Cooper Hospital, Constituency No.: 63

65.26 12.96 4.10 17.79 5 18.96

2015 A E C A C Independent C 69

D 54.06 156 A 13.45 F 3.45 F 9.41 A 5 D 17.75 2014

Bhavna Age: 37 yrs, Edu.: HSC, Ward: K/West Member: Markets and Gardens Committee, Women and Child Shift: No. of questions; Quality of A. Mangela Area: S.N.D.T. University Campus - Airport, Constituency No.: 64 Welfare Committee, Ward Committee K/West questions

53.99 7.66 4.97 13.10 5 18.25 2015 D 148 D E E A C

INC C 66.41 71 B 10.58 E 7.16 C 19.49 A 5 D 17.19 2014

Binita Age: 34 yrs, Edu.: B.Com, Diploma in Apparel Manufacture and Design Member: Women and Child Welfare Committee, Shift: Attendance; No. of questions; M. Vora Ward: K/West, Area: (W) - Mithibai College, Constituency No.: 65 Ward Committee K/West Quality of questions

42.56 9.52 0.41 6.00 5 19.63 2015 E 199 C F F A C

BJP E 46.98 199 F 3.73 F 0.72 E 12.03 A 5 C 19.50 2014

Ujjwala Age: 48 yrs, Edu.: B.A., Ward: K/East, Member: Improvements Committee, Ward Committee K/East S. Modak Area: Bandrekar Wadi - Ismail College - Natwar Nagar, Constituency No.: 66

50 MUMBAI REPORT CARD MUNICIPAL COUNCILLORS 2015 51 NO. OF QUALITY OF LEAST CRIMINAL PERCEIVED TOTAL ATTENDANCE MUNICIPAL QUESTIONS QUESTIONS RECORD PERFORMANCE PARTY GRADE SCORE RANK COUNCILLOR Actual Actual * Actual Actual Actual % Grade Grade Grade Grade Grade out of 15 out of 10 out of 28 out of 5 out of 30

47.99 10.45 1.05 6.90 5 20.59 2015 E 181 C F F A C

SS C 62.84 96 A 12.61 F 3.45 C 18.76 A 5 C 18.03 2014

Manjiri Age: 58 yrs, Edu.: Ninth Member: Women and Child Welfare Committee, Shift: Attendance; No. of questions; G. Parab Ward: K/East, Area: Jogeshwari Caves - Majaswadi, Constituency No.: 67 Ward Committee K/East Quality of questions

64.72 15.00 9.77 18.83 -5 19.63 2015 C 75 A A C F C

SS C 67.16 62 A 14.83 A 15.00 C 18.64 F -5 D 17.69 2014

Anant Age: 49 yrs, Edu.: SSC Member: Works Committee (Suburbs), B. Nar Ward: K/East, Area: Shivneri Vasahat - Meghwadi, Constituency No.: 68 Ward Committee K/East

55.13 10.90 4.10 11.37 5 19.77 2015 D 139 B E E A C

SS C 62.06 101 B 10.71 F 5.04 D 16.40 A 5 C 18.92 2014

Shivani Age: 37 yrs, Edu.: SSC, Ward: K/East Member: Markets and Gardens Committee, Shift: No. of questions; Quality of S. Parab Area: Shankarwadi - Sher-E-Punjab Colony Constituency No.: 69 Ward Committee K/East questions

54.15 10.03 4.10 16.27 -2 20.74 2015 D 147 C E D F C

MNS C 62.20 99 B 11.59 C 10.22 C 18.84 F -2 C 18.56 2014

Bhalchandra Age: 44 yrs, Edu.: SSC Member: Works Committee (Suburbs), Shift: No. of questions; Quality of G. Ambure Ward: K/East, Area: Squatter’s Colony - Tolani College, Constituency No.: 70 Ward Committee K/East, Standing Committee questions

52 MUMBAI REPORT CARD MUNICIPAL COUNCILLORS 2015 53 NO. OF QUALITY OF LEAST CRIMINAL PERCEIVED TOTAL ATTENDANCE MUNICIPAL QUESTIONS QUESTIONS RECORD PERFORMANCE PARTY GRADE SCORE RANK COUNCILLOR Actual Actual * Actual Actual Actual % Grade Grade Grade Grade Grade out of 15 out of 10 out of 28 out of 5 out of 30

60.42 7.64 6.52 15.37 5 21.90 2015 C 103 D C D A B

SS E 47.08 198 B 11.47 F 1.65 F 6.00 A 5 D 17.96 2014

Sandhya Age: 39 yrs, Edu.: F.Y.J.C. Shift: No. of questions; Quality of Member: Public Health Committee, Ward Committee K/East S. Yadav Ward: K/East, Area: Gundavali Gaonthan (West), Constituency No.: 71 questions

51.27 11.11 9.17 10.54 -5 19.45 2015 D 165 B A E F C

SS C 62.87 94 A 12.14 A 13.01 C 16.94 F -5 C 19.78 2014

Sunita Age: 51 yrs, Edu.: Upto SSC Member: Women and Child Welfare Committee, Shift: No. of questions; Quality of J. Elawadekar Ward: K/East, Area: Gundavali (East) - E.S.I.S. Hospital, Constituency No.: 72 Ward Committee K/East questions

39.28 9.98 0.00 0.00 5 18.30 2015 E 206 C F F A C

INC E 40.74 212 B 11.75 F 0.00 F 0.00 A 5 C 18.99 2014

Kesarben Age: 40 yrs, Edu.: Seventh Member: Women and Child Welfare Committee, M. Patel Ward: K/East, Area: Veravali - M.I.D.C., Constituency No.: 73 Ward Committee K/East

63.93 13.74 8.53 20.29 -2 18.93 2015 C 80 A A B F C

SS C 64.85 78 A 14.21 C 9.42 B 19.89 F -2 D 17.33 2014

Pramod Age: 42 yrs, Edu.: SSC Member: Public Health Committee, Ward Committee K/East P. Sawant Ward: K/East, Area: Vijay Nagar - Bhavani Nagar, Constituency No.: 74

54 MUMBAI REPORT CARD MUNICIPAL COUNCILLORS 2015 55 NO. OF QUALITY OF LEAST CRIMINAL PERCEIVED TOTAL ATTENDANCE MUNICIPAL QUESTIONS QUESTIONS RECORD PERFORMANCE PARTY GRADE SCORE RANK COUNCILLOR Actual Actual * Actual Actual Actual % Grade Grade Grade Grade Grade out of 15 out of 10 out of 28 out of 5 out of 30

51.24 5.57 3.60 13.81 5 18.26 2015 D 166 E E E A C

INC D 58.10 130 D 7.83 F 2.52 C 17.57 A 5 C 18.18 2014

Sushma Age: 38 yrs, Edu.: SSC Member: Markets and Gardens Committee, Shift: Attendance; Quality of questions K. Rai Ward: K/East, Area: Sahar Airport - Maroshi Village, Constituency No.: 75 Ward Committee K/East

67.95 11.88 7.12 14.50 5 24.45 2015 C 47 B B D A A

SS C 60.13 119 A 12.76 E 7.16 E 10.82 A 5 C 18.40 2014

Smita Age: 54 yrs, Edu.: SSC Member: Works Committee (Suburbs), Shift: Quality of questions; Perceived S. Sawant Ward: K/East, Area: Chakala - Sahar Airport, Constituency No.: 76 Ward Committee K/East Performance

45.04 11.38 0.41 3.00 5 18.81 2015 E 190 B F F A C

INC E 38.37 215 B 10.66 F 0.00 F 0.00 A 5 D 15.71 2014

Winnifred Age: 55 yrs, Edu.: SSC Member: Women and Child Welfare Committee, Quality of questions; Perceived B. D’souza Ward: K/East, Area: Sahar Village - Baman Wada, Constituency No.: 77 Ward Committee K/East, Improvements Committee Performance

59.43 12.48 3.60 15.22 5 20.13 2015 D 109 A E D A C

SS C 62.54 97 B 11.23 F 5.04 D 16.73 A 5 C 19.54 2014

Manisha Age: 49 yrs, Edu.: Ninth, Ward: K/East Member: Public Health Committee, Ward Committee K/East M. Panchal Area: M. V. College - Vijay Nagar - Koldongri, Constituency No.: 78

56 MUMBAI REPORT CARD MUNICIPAL COUNCILLORS 2015 57 NO. OF QUALITY OF LEAST CRIMINAL PERCEIVED TOTAL ATTENDANCE MUNICIPAL QUESTIONS QUESTIONS RECORD PERFORMANCE PARTY GRADE SCORE RANK COUNCILLOR Actual Actual * Actual Actual Actual % Grade Grade Grade Grade Grade out of 15 out of 10 out of 28 out of 5 out of 30

65.31 11.18 3.60 18.49 5 22.60 2015 C 67 B E C A B

SS D 53.73 161 A 12.42 F 2.52 F 9.06 A 5 C 19.72 2014

Shubhada Age: 59 yrs, Edu.: B.A., D.Ed., Ward: K/East, Area: Tejpal Scheme - Member: Works Committee (Suburbs), Ward Committee Shift: No. of questions; Quality of S. Patkar Paranjape Scheme - Vile Parle (East), Constituency No.: 79 K/East, Education Committee questions; Perceived Performance

65.35 12.15 3.60 18.97 0 21.14

2015 A E C F B INDEPENDENT C 64

D 51.36 180 C 9.46 F 2.52 D 15.60 F 0 D 17.79 2014

Jyoti Age: 41 yrs, Edu.: B.Com Member: Works Committee (Suburbs), Shift: Quality of questions; Perceived P. Alavani Ward: K/East, Area: Vile Parle (E), Telephone Exchange, Constituency No.: 80 Ward Committee K/East Performance

52.69 9.16 1.05 14.65 5 19.83 2015 D 159 C F D A C

MNS E 49.89 186 A 12.09 F 2.52 F 6.00 A 5 C 19.28 2014

Snehal Age: 41 yrs, Edu.: Upto SSC Member: Public Health Committee, Women and Child Welfare S. Shinde Ward: H/East, Area: Prabhat Colony, Anand Nagar, Constituency No.: 81 Committee, Ward Committee H/East and H/West

30.76 6.74 0.00 0.00 5 17.01 2015 F 217 E F F A D

MNS D 56.92 138 D 7.52 F 3.45 C 18.54 A 5 D 15.41 2014

Sukhada Age: 36 yrs, Edu.: Upto HSC Shift: No. of Question; Quality of Member: Ward Committee H/East and H/West R. Pawar Ward: H/East, Area: Vivekanand Nagar, Constituency No.: 82 questions

58 MUMBAI REPORT CARD MUNICIPAL COUNCILLORS 2015 59 NO. OF QUALITY OF LEAST CRIMINAL PERCEIVED TOTAL ATTENDANCE MUNICIPAL QUESTIONS QUESTIONS RECORD PERFORMANCE PARTY GRADE SCORE RANK COUNCILLOR Actual Actual * Actual Actual Actual % Grade Grade Grade Grade Grade out of 15 out of 10 out of 28 out of 5 out of 30

53.27 8.93 4.70 13.49 5 19.16 2015 D 155 D E E A C

SS D 56.11 143 C 10.44 F 5.04 E 10.97 A 5 D 17.66 2014

Sunaina Age: 52 yrs, Edu.: B.Com, Ward: H/East Member: Markets and Gardens Committee, Ward Committee S. Potnis Area: University Campus - Dharamashi Colony, Constituency No.: 83 H/East and H/West, Education Committee

54.31 13.84 7.12 14.80 -5 18.55 2015 D 146 A B D F C

INC C 64.04 84 A 14.02 A 12.87 C 17.41 F -5 D 17.74 2014

Brian Age: 47 yrs, Edu.: HSC, Ward: H/East Member: Works Committee (Suburbs), Ward Committee Shift: No. of Question; Quality of F. Miranda Area: Kalina Village - Santacruz Cantonment, Constituency No.: 84 H/East and H/West questions

40.86 8.30 3.10 8.79 3 16.68

2015 D F F C D INDEPENDENT E 202

D 52.06 173 B 11.63 F 2.52 D 14.13 C 3 E 14.78 2014

Ilyas Age: 53 yrs, Edu.: SSC Member: Law, Revenue and General Purposes Committee, Shift: Attendance; Quality of questions B. Shaikh Ward: H/East, Area: Bharat Nagar (E), Constituency No.: 85 Ward Committee H/East and H/West

69.88 13.39 3.60 19.08 5 22.37 2015 C 38 A E C A B

SS C 64.07 81 A 14.32 E 6.11 D 14.83 A 5 D 16.81 2014

Pooja Age: 48 yrs, Edu.: SSC Member: Women and Child Welfare Committee, Shift: Quality of questions; Perceived V. Mahadeshwar Ward: H/East, Area: T.P.S. III Santacruz - Ashok Nagar, Constituency No.: 86 Ward Committee H/East and H/West Performance

60 MUMBAI REPORT CARD MUNICIPAL COUNCILLORS 2015 61 NO. OF QUALITY OF LEAST CRIMINAL PERCEIVED TOTAL ATTENDANCE MUNICIPAL QUESTIONS QUESTIONS RECORD PERFORMANCE PARTY GRADE SCORE RANK COUNCILLOR Actual Actual * Actual Actual Actual % Grade Grade Grade Grade Grade out of 15 out of 10 out of 28 out of 5 out of 30

57.32 10.52 1.05 16.89 5 19.42 2015 D 119 B F C A C

BJP C 69.25 41 A 13.67 A 13.94 E 11.65 A 5 C 18.00 2014 Member: Works Committee (Suburbs), Law, Revenue and Krishna Age: 35 yrs, Edu.: F.Y.B.Com, Ward: H/East General Purposes Committee, Ward Committee H/East Shift: Attendance; No. of questions Area: Dawari Colony - Khar Rifle Range, Constituency No.: 87 D. Parkar and H/West

71.08 14.55 7.53 18.81 5 18.76 2015 B 29 A B C A C

SS B 72.73 23 A 15.00 B 11.61 D 16.62 A 5 D 17.50 2014

Deepak Age: 50 yrs, Edu.: SSC, D.M.E. Member: Works Committee (Suburbs), Ward Committee R. Bhutkar Ward: H/East, Area: Teacher’s Colony - Jawahar Nagar, Constituency No.: 88 H/East and H/West

72.23 14.48 7.99 15.15 5 21.13 2015 B 20 A B D A B

SS C 67.92 52 A 15.00 B 10.74 E 11.76 A 5 C 18.42 2014

Anil Age: 60 yrs, Edu.: B.Com, Ward: H/East Member: Law, Revenue and General Purposes Committee, Shift: Quality of questions; Perceived P. Trimbakkar Area: Government Colony - Bharat Nagar (W), Constituency No.: 89 Ward Committee H/East and H/West, Education Committee Performance

68.66 12.29 7.53 17.10 5 18.59 2015 C 45 A B C A C

INC C 61.31 107 B 11.09 C 10.22 E 12.73 A 5 D 15.28 2014

Priyatama Age: 42 yrs, Edu.: B.A.M.S Member: Ward Committee H/East and H/West, Shift: Quality of questions; Perceived S. Sawant Ward: H/East, Area: Terminus - Nirmal Nagar, Constituency No.: 90 Education Committee Performance

62 MUMBAI REPORT CARD MUNICIPAL COUNCILLORS 2015 63 NO. OF QUALITY OF LEAST CRIMINAL PERCEIVED TOTAL ATTENDANCE MUNICIPAL QUESTIONS QUESTIONS RECORD PERFORMANCE PARTY GRADE SCORE RANK COUNCILLOR Actual Actual * Actual Actual Actual % Grade Grade Grade Grade Grade out of 15 out of 10 out of 28 out of 5 out of 30

61.79 7.66 6.52 19.85 5 17.76 2015 C 94 D C B A D

INC B 70.00 34 C 10.40 B 10.74 B 19.70 A 5 D 17.16 2014

Gulistan Age: 31 yrs, Edu.: B.U.M.S. Member: Public Health Committee, Shift: Attendance; No. of Question Ahrar A. Shaikh Ward: H/East, Area: Kherwadi, Constituency No.: 91 Ward Committee H/East and H/West

55.89 8.76 3.60 15.15 5 18.39 2015 D 131 D E D A C

MNS D 57.60 131 C 9.53 D 7.62 E 10.10 A 5 C 19.35 2014

Geeta Age: 52 yrs, Edu.: Sixth Member: Women and Child Welfare Committee, S. Chavan Ward: H/West, Area: Khira Nagar - Muktanand Park, Constituency No.: 92 Ward Committee H/East and H/West

55.93 8.83 1.73 14.20 5 18.73 2015 D 130 D F D A C

BJP C 62.23 98 B 10.80 C 10.22 E 11.79 A 5 D 17.43 2014

Alka Age: 62 yrs, Edu.: B.Sc., Ward: H/West, Area: Vitthaldas Nagar - Member: Works Committee (Suburbs), Shift: Attendance; No. of Question S. Kerkar Madhu Park (Khar West) Saraswat Colony, Constituency No.: 93 Ward Committee H/East and H/West

65.38 8.66 3.60 17.24 5 22.44 2015 C 63 D E C A B

INC E 47.79 195 D 8.45 F 1.65 F 8.48 A 5 D 17.22 2014

Sunita Age: 37 yrs, Edu.: T.Y.B.Com Member: Law, Revenue and General Purposes Committee, Shift: No. of questions; Quality of S. Wavekar Ward: H/West, Area: Khar Danda, Chuim Village, Constituency No.: 94 Ward Committee H/East and H/West questions; Perceived Performance

64 MUMBAI REPORT CARD MUNICIPAL COUNCILLORS 2015 65 NO. OF QUALITY OF LEAST CRIMINAL PERCEIVED TOTAL ATTENDANCE MUNICIPAL QUESTIONS QUESTIONS RECORD PERFORMANCE PARTY GRADE SCORE RANK COUNCILLOR Actual Actual * Actual Actual Actual % Grade Grade Grade Grade Grade out of 15 out of 10 out of 28 out of 5 out of 30

69.73 12.50 7.99 17.56 5 19.24 2015 C 39 A B C A C

INC C 66.52 70 A 14.02 D 7.62 D 14.57 A 5 C 18.31 2014

Asif Age: 44 yrs, Edu.: B.Com Member: Law, Revenue and General Purposes Committee, Shift: Quality of questions A. Zakaria Ward: H/West, Area: Union Park - National College, Constituency No.: 95 Ward Committee H/East and H/West, Standing Committee

51.96 11.26 1.73 7.64 5 17.88 2015 D 161 B F F A D

INC E 46.34 201 C 9.99 F 1.65 F 6.00 A 5 D 16.70 2014

Karen Age: 49 yrs, Edu.: B.A., L.L.B., Ward: H/West Member: Public Health Committee, Shift: Attendance; Quality of questions Cecilia A. D’mello Area: Bandra Fort - Pali Market - National Library, Constituency No.: 96 Ward Committee H/East and H/West

30.73 2.86 0.00 0.00 5 17.87 2015 F 218 F F F A D

INC D 52.71 168 D 8.42 F 1.65 D 14.48 A 5 D 16.16 2014

Mohd. Tanveer Age: 36 yrs, Edu.: HSC, Ward: H/West Member: Works Committee (Suburbs), Shift: Attendance; No. of questions; Mohd. Ali Patel Area: Lilavati Hospital - Bandra Bus Terminus, Constituency No.: 97 Ward Committee H/East and H/West Quality of questions

67.22 12.15 4.97 16.85 5 18.79 2015 C 53 A E C A C

BJP C 61.59 104 B 11.92 F 4.31 D 16.11 A 5 D 17.26 2014

Samita Age: 47 yrs, Edu.: B.Com Member: Women and Child Welfare Committee, Shift: Attendance; Perceived V. Kamble Ward: T, Area: Mulund Colony - , Constituency No.: 98 Ward Committee S and T Performance

66 MUMBAI REPORT CARD MUNICIPAL COUNCILLORS 2015 67 NO. OF QUALITY OF LEAST CRIMINAL PERCEIVED TOTAL ATTENDANCE MUNICIPAL QUESTIONS QUESTIONS RECORD PERFORMANCE PARTY GRADE SCORE RANK COUNCILLOR Actual Actual * Actual Actual Actual % Grade Grade Grade Grade Grade out of 15 out of 10 out of 28 out of 5 out of 30

51.38 8.15 5.84 18.72 -5 17.67 2015 D 164 D D C F D

NCP D 55.81 147 B 10.69 D 8.49 D 15.98 F -5 C 18.65 2014

Nandkumar Age: 53 yrs, Edu.: HSC, Ward: T Member: Works Committee (Suburbs), Public Health A. Vaity Area: Topiwala College - Gavan Pada - Mhada Colony, Constituency No.: 100 Committee, Ward Committee S and T

52.79 12.24 2.51 14.00 0 19.04 2015 D 158 A F E F C

MNS D 50.02 185 A 12.88 F 4.31 E 10.12 F 0 D 17.72 2014

Sujata Age: 33 yrs, Edu.: SSC Member: Public Health Committee, Ward Committee S and T R. Pathak Ward: T, Area: Nane Pada - Palm Acers, Constituency No.: 101

53.64 12.26 5.29 9.94 -5 21.29 2015 D 151 A D E F B

BJP D 59.38 123 A 13.02 A 12.00 D 15.81 F -5 D 17.54 2014

Prakash Age: 60 yrs, Edu.: Eleventh Member: Law, Revenue and General Purposes Committee, Shift: No. of Question; Quality of K. Gangadhare Ward: T, Area: Mulund Central, Constituency No.: 102 Ward Committee S and T, Improvements Committee questions

58.57 10.13 8.26 9.52 -2 20.86 2015 D 111 C A F F C

BJP C 63.46 88 B 11.90 B 11.28 C 17.71 F -2 D 17.57 2014

Manoj Age: 42 yrs, Edu.: SSC, Ward: T, Area: Johnson & Johnson - Member: Education Committee, Ward Committee S and T, Shift: No. of Question; Quality of K. Kotak Sarvodaya Nagar - Nahur Village, Constituency No.: 103 Standing Committee questions

68 MUMBAI REPORT CARD MUNICIPAL COUNCILLORS 2015 69 NO. OF QUALITY OF LEAST CRIMINAL PERCEIVED TOTAL ATTENDANCE MUNICIPAL QUESTIONS QUESTIONS RECORD PERFORMANCE PARTY GRADE SCORE RANK COUNCILLOR Actual Actual * Actual Actual Actual % Grade Grade Grade Grade Grade out of 15 out of 10 out of 28 out of 5 out of 30

64.26 10.43 8.53 21.64 -5 22.66 2015 C 77 C A B F B

INC D 53.87 158 B 11.73 C 9.42 D 14.09 F -5 D 17.63 2014

Suresh Age: 63 yrs, Edu.: SSC Member: Markets and Gardens Committee, Ward Committee Shift: Quality of questions; Perceived H. Koparkar Ward: S, Area: Milind Nagar, Constituency No.: 104 S and T, Improvements Committee Performance

65.87 11.07 2.51 19.02 5 19.82 2015 B F C A C INDEPENDENT C 60

C 63.13 93 A 12.54 D 8.16 D 14.06 A 5 D 17.37 2014

Mangesh Age: 47 yrs, Edu.: HSC Member: Markets and Gardens Committee, Tree Committee, N. Pawar Ward: S, Area: Village, Constituency No.: 105 Ward Committee S and T

60.08 12.44 5.84 14.79 -5 22.93 2015 C 105 A D D F B

SS D 57.50 135 B 11.55 C 9.42 D 16.72 F -5 C 19.81 2014

Ramesh Age: 54 yrs, Edu.: Upto SSC Member: Ward Committee S and T, Standing Committee, G. Korgaonkar Ward: S, Area: Gaondevi (Bhandup) Tembipada, Constituency No.: 106 Tree Committee

63.04 11.65 6.84 18.90 -5 21.21 2015 C 86 B C C F B

MNS C 65.28 77 A 13.84 A 12.93 C 18.14 F -5 C 18.38 2014

Anisha Age: 38 yrs, Edu.: Graduate, Member: Works Committee (Suburbs), Women and Child A. Majgaonkar Ward: S, Area: Nardas Nagar, Constituency No.: 107 Welfare Committee, Ward Committee S and T

70 MUMBAI REPORT CARD MUNICIPAL COUNCILLORS 2015 71 NO. OF QUALITY OF LEAST CRIMINAL PERCEIVED TOTAL ATTENDANCE MUNICIPAL QUESTIONS QUESTIONS RECORD PERFORMANCE PARTY GRADE SCORE RANK COUNCILLOR Actual Actual * Actual Actual Actual % Grade Grade Grade Grade Grade out of 15 out of 10 out of 28 out of 5 out of 30

44.60 9.27 1.05 8.84 0 18.43 2015 E 191 C F F F C

MNS E 39.04 213 D 8.44 F 0.00 F 0.00 A 5 C 18.61 2014

Rupesh Age: 28 yrs, Edu.: SSC Member: Public Health Committee, Markets and Gardens Shift: No. of Question; Quality of U. Waingankar Ward: S, Area: Kokan Nagar - Bhattipada, Constituency No.: 108 Committee, Ward Committee S and T questions

72.28 10.38 6.39 19.56 5 21.80 2015 B 19 C C C A B

MNS B 70.07 33 A 13.89 C 10.22 D 16.76 A 5 C 18.21 2014

Vaishnavi Age: 39 yrs, Edu.: HSC Member: Ward Committee S and T V. Sarfare Ward: S, Area: Hanuman Nagar - Farid Nagar, Constituency No.: 109

71.23 10.20 4.97 13.99 5 25.11 2015 B 27 C E E A A

NCP C 65.73 74 A 12.41 E 6.11 D 14.09 A 5 B 21.14 2014

Dhananjay Age: 60 yrs, Edu.: B.Com Member: Ward Committee S and T, Standing Committee, Shift: Perceived Performance S. Pisal Ward: S, Area: Datar Colony - C.G.S. Quarters, Constituency No.: 110 Tree Committee

60.59 7.44 2.51 17.84 5 18.34 2015 C 102 E F C A C

SS E 47.09 197 D 8.10 E 6.11 F 4.03 A 5 D 16.86 2014

Ashok Age: 56 yrs, Edu.: B.A., L.L.B. Shift: Quality of questions; Perceived Member: Improvements Committee, Ward Committee S and T D. Patil Ward: S, Area: Kanjur Village, Constituency No.: 111 Performance

72 MUMBAI REPORT CARD MUNICIPAL COUNCILLORS 2015 73 NO. OF QUALITY OF LEAST CRIMINAL PERCEIVED TOTAL ATTENDANCE MUNICIPAL QUESTIONS QUESTIONS RECORD PERFORMANCE PARTY GRADE SCORE RANK COUNCILLOR Actual Actual * Actual Actual Actual % Grade Grade Grade Grade Grade out of 15 out of 10 out of 28 out of 5 out of 30

42.00 8.51 1.73 6.00 5 20.76 2015 E 200 D F F A C

SS E 49.71 188 D 7.71 E 6.11 F 8.75 A 5 C 18.15 2014

Tavji Age: 61 yrs, Edu.: Seventh Shift: No. of Question; Quality of Member: Public Health Committee, Ward Committee S and T S. Gorule Ward: S, Area: Tagore Nagar, Constituency No.: 113 questions

49.61 9.07 1.05 8.98 5 20.51 2015 E 174 C F F A C

SS D 58.85 126 C 9.41 F 3.45 E 13.50 A 5 C 20.49 2014

Vishwas Age: 51 yrs, Edu.: HSC Member: Law, Revenue and General Purposes Committee, Shift: No. of Question; Quality of T. Shinde Ward: S, Area: Hariyali Village - Godrej Colony, Constituency No.: 114 Ward Committee S and T questions

56.70 4.11 2.51 19.36 5 19.72 2015 D 124 F F C A C

NCP D 56.68 141 D 7.53 F 3.45 D 14.46 A 5 C 19.24 2014

Chandan Age: 50 yrs, Edu.: HSC, Ward: S Member: Ward Committee S and T, Improvements Committee C. Sharma Area: Eden Bungalows - Tirandaz Village, Constituency No.: 115

25.37 5.82 0.00 0.00 -5 18.11 2015 F 220 E F F F C

MNS F 28.54 225 F 4.29 F 0.72 F 3.03 F -5 C 19.51 2014

Avinash Age: 43 yrs, Edu.: Ninth, Ward: S Member: Public Health Committee, Markets and Gardens B. Sawant Area: - Lake - Paspoli village, Constituency No.: 116 Committee, Ward Committee S and T, Improvements Committee

74 MUMBAI REPORT CARD MUNICIPAL COUNCILLORS 2015 75 NO. OF QUALITY OF LEAST CRIMINAL PERCEIVED TOTAL ATTENDANCE MUNICIPAL QUESTIONS QUESTIONS RECORD PERFORMANCE PARTY GRADE SCORE RANK COUNCILLOR Actual Actual * Actual Actual Actual % Grade Grade Grade Grade Grade out of 15 out of 10 out of 28 out of 5 out of 30

44.51 8.03 1.05 6.07 5 18.36 2015 E 193 D F F A C

SS D 57.60 132 C 9.13 F 5.04 E 13.47 A 5 D 17.95 2014

Bharti Age: 42 yrs, Edu.: M.B.B.S Shift: No. of Question; Quality of Member: Public Health Committee, Ward Committee N S. Bawdane Ward: N, Area: Rahul Nagar, Constituency No.: 117 questions

55.17 9.07 5.84 16.45 -5 19.37 2015 D 137 C D D F C

NCP F 29.45 224 E 7.39 F 0.72 F 1.00 F -5 C 18.34 2014

Harun Age: 55 yrs, Edu.: SSC, Ward: N Shift: Attendance; No. of questions; Member: Ward Committee N Y. Khan Area: Parksite Colony - Vikroli Village, Constituency No.: 118 Quality of questions

54.36 5.84 1.73 12.93 5 22.86 2015 D 145 E F E A B

MNS C 60.52 117 D 8.41 F 4.31 D 16.73 A 5 C 19.08 2014

Sanjay Age: 37 yrs, Edu.: B.Com, Ward: N Shift: Attendance; No. of questions; Member: Ward Committee N D. Bhalerao Area: Damodar Park - Sanghani Estate, Constituency No.: 119 Quality of questions

34.19 3.01 0.00 0.00 5 21.19 2015 F 210 F F F A B

NCP E 48.66 192 E 7.45 F 4.31 F 6.02 A 5 C 18.89 2014

Pratiksha Age: 36 yrs, Edu.: HSC, Ward: N, Area: Sarvodaya Hospital - Member: Law, Revenue and General Purposes Committee, Shift: Attendance; No. of questions; R. Ghuge Central Government Colony - Jagdusha Nagar, Constituency No.: 120 Ward Committee N Quality of questions

76 MUMBAI REPORT CARD MUNICIPAL COUNCILLORS 2015 77 NO. OF QUALITY OF LEAST CRIMINAL PERCEIVED TOTAL ATTENDANCE MUNICIPAL QUESTIONS QUESTIONS RECORD PERFORMANCE PARTY GRADE SCORE RANK COUNCILLOR Actual Actual * Actual Actual Actual % Grade Grade Grade Grade Grade out of 15 out of 10 out of 28 out of 5 out of 30

72.56 10.39 8.53 18.59 5 19.62 2015 B 16 C A C A C

BJP B 73.86 16 C 10.37 A 12.47 B 22.28 A 5 D 16.75 2014

Ritu Age: 42 yrs, Edu.: S.Y.B.Com Member: Works Committee (Suburbs), Education Committee, R. Tawade Ward: N, Area: Bhim Nagar - Ram Nagar, Constituency No.: 121 Ward Committee N

65.83 13.68 7.80 20.42 0 19.93

2015 A B B F C Independent C 61

B 73.66 17 A 12.54 A 13.86 C 18.70 A 5 D 16.57 2014

Deepak Age: 46 yrs, Edu.: HSC Member: Markets and Gardens Committee, Works Committee Shift: No. of Question; New FIR W. Hande Ward: N, Area: Bhatwadi - Barve Nagar, Constituency No.: 122 (Suburbs), Ward Committee N

70.33 13.77 6.84 18.93 5 18.80 2015 B 34 A C C A C

SS C 67.43 59 A 12.76 E 6.11 C 17.11 A 5 C 20.46 2014

Ashwini Age: 46 yrs, Edu.: HSC Member: Works Committee (Suburbs), Ward Committee N, B. Mate Ward: N, Area: Chirag Nagar - Narayan Nagar, Constituency No.: 123 Improvements Committee

59.81 10.27 8.26 15.40 -5 22.39 2015 D 107 C A D F B

INC C 65.53 75 B 11.75 A 12.00 B 21.85 F -5 C 18.93 2014

Pravin Age: 50 yrs, Edu.: SSC Member: Law, Revenue and General Purposes Committee, Shift: No. of Question; Quality of V. Chheda Ward: N, Area: Kirol Village - Ramji Ashar School, Constituency No.: 124 Ward Committee N, Standing Committee questions

78 MUMBAI REPORT CARD MUNICIPAL COUNCILLORS 2015 79 NO. OF QUALITY OF LEAST CRIMINAL PERCEIVED TOTAL ATTENDANCE MUNICIPAL QUESTIONS QUESTIONS RECORD PERFORMANCE PARTY GRADE SCORE RANK COUNCILLOR Actual Actual * Actual Actual Actual % Grade Grade Grade Grade Grade out of 15 out of 10 out of 28 out of 5 out of 30

61.97 8.57 5.29 18.75 5 18.35 2015 C 91 D D C A C

NCP D 51.69 175 D 8.81 F 0.72 E 11.84 A 5 C 18.32 2014

Rakhee Age: 40 yrs, Edu.: SSC Shift: No. of Question; Quality of Member: Ward Committee N, Standing Committee H. Jadhav Ward: N, Area: Pant Nagar, Constituency No.: 125 questions

61.99 6.12 6.39 16.99 5 21.49 2015 C 90 E C C A B

MNS D 54.33 155 D 7.89 F 2.52 D 14.74 A 5 C 18.18 2014

Suresh Age: 42 yrs, Edu.: SSC Member: Works Committee (Suburbs), Law, Revenue and Shift: No. of Question; Quality of D. Awale Ward: N, Area: Ramabai Nagar, Constituency No.: 126 General Purposes Committee, Ward Committee N questions; Perceived Performance

70.11 10.96 7.99 17.12 5 19.56 2015 B 35 B B C A C

BJP C 66.53 69 C 9.82 A 12.35 D 14.15 A 5 C 18.21 2014

Falguni Age: 53 yrs, Edu.: Diploma in Medical Technology Member: Public Health Committee, Women and Child Welfare Shift: Quality of questions M. Dave Ward: N, Area: Garodia Nagar - Somaiya College, Constituency No.: 127 Committee, Ward Committee N

34.05 3.01 0.00 0.00 5 20.04 2015 F 211 F F F A C

MNS F 32.42 223 F 3.45 F 0.00 F 0.00 A 5 D 17.98 2014

Mangal Age: 34 yrs, Edu.: SSC Member: Markets and Gardens Committee, Women and Child P. Kadam Ward: N, Area: Kamraj Nagar, Constituency No.: 128 Welfare Committee, Ward Committee N

80 MUMBAI REPORT CARD MUNICIPAL COUNCILLORS 2015 81 NO. OF QUALITY OF LEAST CRIMINAL PERCEIVED TOTAL ATTENDANCE MUNICIPAL QUESTIONS QUESTIONS RECORD PERFORMANCE PARTY GRADE SCORE RANK COUNCILLOR Actual Actual * Actual Actual Actual % Grade Grade Grade Grade Grade out of 15 out of 10 out of 28 out of 5 out of 30

65.32 13.20 9.58 18.21 5 18.33 2015 C 65 A A C A C

SP B 73.21 19 A 13.21 A 14.40 C 16.81 A 5 D 17.78 2014

Reshma Age: 45 yrs, Edu.: Upto SSC Member: Works Committee (Suburbs), Public Health Committee, Shift: No. of Question R. Nevrekar Ward: M/East, Area: Lotus Colony, Rafique Nagar, Constituency No.: 129 Women and Child Welfare Committee, Ward Committee M/East

42.73 6.02 1.05 15.36 0 18.30

2015 E F D F C Independent E 198

E 38.58 214 D 8.08 F 1.65 F 6.00 F 0 D 17.85 2014

Mohd. Siraj Age: 33 yrs, Edu.: Ninth Member: Works Committee (Suburbs), Standing Committee, Mohd. I. Shaikh Ward: M/East, Area: Shivaji Nagar No.1, Constituency No.: 130 Ward Committee M/East

43.97 9.37 4.10 11.66 -5 19.84 2015 E 195 C E E F C

SP E 47.52 196 D 8.53 E 6.11 D 14.09 F -5 D 17.78 2014

Noorjahan Age: 39 yrs, Edu.: Seventh, Ward: M/East Member: Ward Committee M/East, Education Committee R. Shaikh Area: Shivaji Nagar No.2 - Sanjay Nagar, Constituency No.: 131

71.91 11.92 8.90 17.97 5 19.21 2015 B 23 B A C A C

SP B 71.94 27 A 12.81 A 13.94 D 14.81 A 5 C 18.38 2014

Rais Age: 40 yrs, Edu.: B.Com, Ward: M/East Member: Standing Committee, Ward Committee M/East K. Shaikh Area: Shastri Nagar - Kamla Raman Nagar, Constituency No.: 132

82 MUMBAI REPORT CARD MUNICIPAL COUNCILLORS 2015 83 NO. OF QUALITY OF LEAST CRIMINAL PERCEIVED TOTAL ATTENDANCE MUNICIPAL QUESTIONS QUESTIONS RECORD PERFORMANCE PARTY GRADE SCORE RANK COUNCILLOR Actual Actual * Actual Actual Actual % Grade Grade Grade Grade Grade out of 15 out of 10 out of 28 out of 5 out of 30

64.77 10.45 5.84 19.37 5 19.11 2015 C 74 C D C A C

SP C 63.19 92 A 12.25 F 5.04 D 15.38 A 5 C 18.53 2014

Shantaram Age: 70 yrs, Edu.: Inter Arts Member: Markets and Gardens Committee, Law, Revenue M. Patil Ward: M/East, Area: Baiganwadi, P.M.G. Colony, Constituency No.: 133 and General Purposes Committee, Ward Committee M/East

36.29 2.55 1.05 14.00 -5 19.69 2015 E 208 F F D F C

SS D 53.83 160 C 9.71 B 11.61 E 13.31 F -5 D 17.20 2014

Rahul Age: 42 yrs, Edu.: Civil Engineering, Ward: M/East Member: Standing Committee, Ward Committee M/East Shift: Attendance; No. of questions R. Shevale Area: Mankhurd Village - Mandala Village, Constituency No.: 134

39.98 9.80 0.00 0.00 5 20.18 2015 E 203 C F F A C

SS D 52.03 174 B 11.34 F 2.52 F 9.32 A 5 D 16.85 2014

Manju Age: 38 yrs, Edu.: M.A., Ward: M/East Member: Law, Revenue and General Purposes Committee, Shift: Attendance; No. of questions; B. Kumare Area: Anushakti Nagar - (B.A.R.C.) - Trombay, Constituency No.: 136 Ward Committee M/East Quality of questions

56.07 8.73 4.97 16.37 5 20.00 2015 D 128 D E D A C

INC D 56.74 140 A 13.24 F 4.31 E 12.86 A 5 D 15.34 2014

Sunanda Age: 41 yrs, Edu.: Eighth, Ward: M/East Member: Ward Committee M/East V. Lokare Area: New Gautam Nagar, Constituency No.: 137

84 MUMBAI REPORT CARD MUNICIPAL COUNCILLORS 2015 85 NO. OF QUALITY OF LEAST CRIMINAL PERCEIVED TOTAL ATTENDANCE MUNICIPAL QUESTIONS QUESTIONS RECORD PERFORMANCE PARTY GRADE SCORE RANK COUNCILLOR Actual Actual * Actual Actual Actual % Grade Grade Grade Grade Grade out of 15 out of 10 out of 28 out of 5 out of 30

53.22 12.52 6.84 13.94 -5 17.48 2015 D 157 A C E F D

BRPB D 51.40 179 C 9.92 D 8.16 D 14.65 F -5 D 16.66 2014

Arun Age: 42 yrs, Edu.: B.A. Member: Markets and Gardens Committee, V. Kamble Ward: M/East, Area: Deonar - Abattoir, Constituency No.: 138 Ward Committee M/East

30.79 8.29 1.73 8.09 -10 18.69 2015 F 216 D F F F C

SS E 45.66 204 B 10.96 F 5.04 D 16.15 F -10 D 17.51 2014

Dinesh Age: 39 yrs, Edu.: Fifth, Ward: M/East Member: Markets and Gardens Committee, H. Panchal Area: Deonar Village - Mankhurd Childrens’ Home, Constituency No.: 139 Ward Committee M/East

65.03 11.21 5.84 18.41 5 18.57 2015 C 71 B D C A C

INC C 60.74 113 A 13.02 E 6.11 E 13.66 A 5 D 15.95 2014

Usha Age: 52 yrs, Edu.: SSC Member: Works Committee (Suburbs), Shift: Quality of questions; Perceived A. Kamble Ward: M/East, Area: R.C.F. Township, Constituency No.: 140 Ward Committee M/East Performance

72.78 13.04 8.26 19.65 5 18.39 2015 B 15 A A B A C

BJP B 73.13 20 A 13.77 B 11.61 C 18.14 A 5 D 17.61 2014

Vithal Age: 58 yrs, Edu.: Matriculation, Ward: M/East, Area: Adarsh Nagar - Member: Standing Committee, Education Committee, A. Kharatmol Hindustan Petroleum - Anik Village, Constituency No.: 141 Ward Committee M/East

86 MUMBAI REPORT CARD MUNICIPAL COUNCILLORS 2015 87 NO. OF QUALITY OF LEAST CRIMINAL PERCEIVED TOTAL ATTENDANCE MUNICIPAL QUESTIONS QUESTIONS RECORD PERFORMANCE PARTY GRADE SCORE RANK COUNCILLOR Actual Actual * Actual Actual Actual % Grade Grade Grade Grade Grade out of 15 out of 10 out of 28 out of 5 out of 30

32.99 1.43 0.41 3.11 5 22.04 2015 F 213 F F F A B

INC E 48.76 191 C 9.25 F 1.65 F 9.31 A 5 C 18.55 2014

Seema Age: 39 yrs, Edu.: Ninth, Ward: M/West Member: Markets and Gardens Committee, Shift: Attendance; No. of questions; R. Mahulkar Area: Anik, Mahul Villages - R.C. F. Company, Constituency No.: 142 Ward Committee M/West Quality of questions

60.90 12.58 4.10 18.89 5 18.32 2015 C 100 A E C A C

BJP C 60.72 114 A 13.39 E 6.11 E 12.55 A 5 D 16.68 2014

Mahadev Age: 53 yrs, Edu.: SSC Member: Law, Revenue and General Purposes Committee, S. Shivgan Ward: M/West, Area: Suman Nagar - Sindhi Society, Constituency No.: 143 Ward Committee M/West

71.24 11.09 9.31 21.27 5 18.57 2015 B 26 B A B A C

BJP B 74.68 12 A 12.92 A 12.00 B 21.89 A 5 D 15.87 2014

Rajshree Age: 40 yrs, Edu.: B.A., Ward: M/West Member: Works Committee (Suburbs), Improvements S. Palande Area: Siddharth Colony - Basant Park, Golf Club, Constituency No.: 144 Committee, Ward Committee M/West

69.40 11.13 5.84 20.05 5 19.94 2015 C 41 B D B A C

INC C 67.73 55 B 11.70 C 10.22 B 19.85 A 5 E 14.98 2014

Vandana Age: 46 yrs, Edu.: Ninth Member: Works Committee (Suburbs), G. Sable Ward: M/West, Area: Sahakar Nagar, Constituency No.: 145 Ward Committee M/West

88 MUMBAI REPORT CARD MUNICIPAL COUNCILLORS 2015 89 NO. OF QUALITY OF LEAST CRIMINAL PERCEIVED TOTAL ATTENDANCE MUNICIPAL QUESTIONS QUESTIONS RECORD PERFORMANCE PARTY GRADE SCORE RANK COUNCILLOR Actual Actual * Actual Actual Actual % Grade Grade Grade Grade Grade out of 15 out of 10 out of 28 out of 5 out of 30

49.84 8.39 1.73 9.21 5 18.05 2015 E 173 D F F A C

SS D 50.56 183 B 10.51 F 4.31 F 6.00 A 5 D 17.74 2014

Suprada Age: 31 yrs, Edu.: HSC, Interior Designer, Fashion Designer, Ward: M/West Member: Public Health Committee, Education Committee, P. Phaterpekar Area: Subhash Nagar - Beggar’s Home, Constituency No.: 146 Ward Committee M/West

71.03 14.82 8.90 17.20 5 19.25 2015 B 31 A A C A C

INC B 70.23 32 A 14.29 B 11.28 E 13.80 A 5 C 18.86 2014

Anil Age: 50 yrs, Edu.: HSC Member: Law, Revenue and General Purposes Committee, R. Patankar Ward: M/West, Area: Borla (Central) - Ghatla Gaon, Constituency No.: 147 Ward Committee M/West

44.52 8.65 0.41 6.00 5 20.47 2015 E 192 D F F A C

INC D 52.73 167 D 9.00 F 2.52 E 13.58 A 5 D 16.63 2014

Sangita Age: 51 yrs, Edu.: Seventh Shift: No. of questions; Quality of Member: Ward Committee M/West C. Handore Ward: M/West, Area: Rahul Nagar-Jyoti Nagar, Constituency No.: 148 questions

43.58 12.47 0.41 6.00 5 19.70 2015 E 196 A F F A C

SS D 57.53 133 A 14.32 E 7.16 F 8.35 A 5 D 17.70 2014

Deepa Age: 63 yrs, Edu.: Upto SSC Member: Women and Child Welfare Committee, Shift: Attendance; No. of questions; N. Parab Ward: M/West, Area: Tilak Nagar - Chedda Nagar, Constituency No.: 149 Ward Committee M/West Quality of questions

90 MUMBAI REPORT CARD MUNICIPAL COUNCILLORS 2015 91 NO. OF QUALITY OF LEAST CRIMINAL PERCEIVED TOTAL ATTENDANCE MUNICIPAL QUESTIONS QUESTIONS RECORD PERFORMANCE PARTY GRADE SCORE RANK COUNCILLOR Actual Actual * Actual Actual Actual % Grade Grade Grade Grade Grade out of 15 out of 10 out of 28 out of 5 out of 30

65.03 7.29 5.84 20.61 5 20.29 2015 C 73 E D B A C

NCP D 59.45 122 D 8.09 D 8.16 E 12.73 A 5 C 19.47 2014

Savita Age: 44 yrs, Edu.: Seventh, Ward: L Member: Works Committee (Suburbs), Ward Committee L Shift: Quality of questions S. Pawar Area: Tungwa Village - Chandivali Village (West), Constituency No.: 150

48.14 6.28 3.60 14.22 -2 19.04 2015 E 180 E E D F C

MNS E 46.11 202 D 8.69 F 4.31 E 10.60 F -2 D 17.51 2014

Ishwar Age: 44 yrs, Edu.: B.A. Member: Law, Revenue and General Purposes Committee, D. Tayade Ward: L, Area: Chandivali Village (East), Constituency No.: 151 Ward Committee L, Education Committee

57.38 12.05 3.60 12.60 5 18.13 2015 D 118 A E E A C

SS D 53.87 159 B 11.91 F 2.52 F 9.45 A 5 C 18.99 2014

Komal Age: 46 yrs, Edu.: Upto SSC Member: Markets and Gardens Committee, Shift: Quality of questions K. Jamsandekar Ward: L, Area: Mohili Village, Constituency No.: 152 Ward Committee L, Education Committee

58.28 6.39 4.97 15.88 5 19.05

2015 E E D A C Independent D 114

C 62.11 100 E 5.62 C 9.42 C 18.07 A 5 D 17.00 2014

Leena Age: 36 yrs, Edu.: B.Com Member: Works Committee (Suburbs), Ward Committee L, H. Shukla Ward: L, Area: Kajupada Hill - Asalpha Village, Constituency No.: 153 Education Committee

92 MUMBAI REPORT CARD MUNICIPAL COUNCILLORS 2015 93 NO. OF QUALITY OF LEAST CRIMINAL PERCEIVED TOTAL ATTENDANCE MUNICIPAL QUESTIONS QUESTIONS RECORD PERFORMANCE PARTY GRADE SCORE RANK COUNCILLOR Actual Actual * Actual Actual Actual % Grade Grade Grade Grade Grade out of 15 out of 10 out of 28 out of 5 out of 30

71.04 10.10 8.90 17.16 5 18.38 2015 B 30 C A C A C

MNS B 72.16 26 C 9.59 A 14.46 C 18.41 A 5 D 17.70 2014

Dilip Age: 53 yrs, Edu.: B.Com., Ward: L, Member: Law, Revenue and General Purposes Committee, B. Lande Area: Kamani Industries - Sakinaka, Constituency No.: 154 Ward Committee L, Standing Committee, Tree Committee

41.76 3.87 0.41 8.06 5 18.42

2015 F F F A C Independent E 201

F 33.55 219 F 4.03 F 0.00 F 0.00 A 5 C 18.52 2014

Lalita Age: 55 yrs, Edu.: Ninth Member: Ward Committee L Annamalai Ward: L, Area: Jarimari, Constituency No.: 155

55.02 5.88 4.97 15.68 5 17.49 2015 D 141 E E D A D

SP C 64.03 85 C 9.95 C 10.22 C 17.23 A 5 D 16.63 2014

Mohd. Ishak Age: 37 yrs, Edu.: Eighth Member: Works Committee (Suburbs), Markets and Gardens Shift: Attendance; No. of questions; Kasim Ali Shaikh Ward: L, Area: Home Guard Training Center, Constituency No.: 156 Committee, Ward Committee L Quality of questions

65.61 11.21 7.53 17.23 0 20.21 2015 C 62 B B C F C

SS C 69.19 42 B 11.87 E 6.11 B 20.83 A 5 C 18.38 2014

Manali Age: 36 yrs, Edu.: SSC, Ward: L, Area: Wadia Estate - Hall Village - Member: Works Committee (Suburbs), Women and Child M. Tulaskar Premier Automobiles, Constituency No.: 157 Welfare Committee, Ward Committee L

94 MUMBAI REPORT CARD MUNICIPAL COUNCILLORS 2015 95 NO. OF QUALITY OF LEAST CRIMINAL PERCEIVED TOTAL ATTENDANCE MUNICIPAL QUESTIONS QUESTIONS RECORD PERFORMANCE PARTY GRADE SCORE RANK COUNCILLOR Actual Actual * Actual Actual Actual % Grade Grade Grade Grade Grade out of 15 out of 10 out of 28 out of 5 out of 30

54.59 7.56 1.73 17.62 5 19.68 2015 D 144 D F C A C

SP E 49.76 187 E 7.50 F 2.52 E 11.69 A 5 D 17.05 2014

Dilshad Age: 54 yrs, Edu.: Fourth Member: Public Health Committee, Ward Committee L Shift: Quality of questions A. Azmi Ward: L, Area: Village, Dayanand Vidyalaya, Constituency No.: 158

66.90 11.67 9.13 18.66 -2 18.62 2015 C 55 B A C F C

SP C 67.83 53 A 12.97 A 13.67 C 17.91 F -2 C 18.30 2014

Ashraf Azmi Age: 49 yrs, Edu.: SSC Member: Ward Committee L, Improvements Committee A. Ansari Ward: L, Area: Vinoba Bhave Nagar, Constituency No.: 159

75.65 13.67 9.31 17.36 5 21.84 2015 B 6 A A C A B

SS B 72.80 22 A 13.49 A 14.13 D 16.06 A 5 D 17.12 2014

Sanjana Age: 40 yrs, Edu.: Eleventh Member: Markets and Gardens Committee, Women and Child K. Mungekar Ward: L, Area: Kurla Terminus - Kamgar Nagar, Constituency No.: 160 Welfare Committee, Ward Committee L

71.26 11.33 10.00 11.16 5 22.45 2015 B 25 B A E A B

NCP C 64.06 83 B 11.30 A 14.93 F 9.65 A 5 D 16.18 2014

Saeeda Age: 46 yrs, Edu.: M.D., DNB, D.A., MBBS Shift: Quality of questions; Perceived Member: Public Health Committee, Ward Committee L A. Khan Ward: L, Area: Shikshak Nagar, Constituency No.: 161 Performance

96 MUMBAI REPORT CARD MUNICIPAL COUNCILLORS 2015 97 NO. OF QUALITY OF LEAST CRIMINAL PERCEIVED TOTAL ATTENDANCE MUNICIPAL QUESTIONS QUESTIONS RECORD PERFORMANCE PARTY GRADE SCORE RANK COUNCILLOR Actual Actual * Actual Actual Actual % Grade Grade Grade Grade Grade out of 15 out of 10 out of 28 out of 5 out of 30

67.69 14.91 9.81 13.29 5 18.37 2015 C 50 A A E A C

SS B 74.24 14 A 15.00 A 14.66 E 12.75 A 5 C 19.83 2014

Anuradha Age: 45 yrs, Edu.: B.A.M.S, Ward: L, Member: Public Health Committee, Ward Committee L, Shift: No. of questions; Perceived M. Pednekar Area: Nehru Nagar - Bhabha Hospital - Takiya Ward, Constituency No.: 162 Standing Committee Performance

62.66 13.50 1.73 15.64 5 18.35 2015 C 88 A F D A C

SS D 52.28 171 A 14.02 F 1.65 E 10.05 A 5 D 15.56 2014

Darshana Age: 44 yrs, Edu.: Ninth Member: Women and Child Welfare Committee, Shift: Quality of questions; Perceived D. Shinde Ward: L, Area: Kasai Wada - Everard Nagar, Constituency No.: 163 Ward Committee L Performance

66.30 8.12 5.29 19.15 5 22.74

2015 D D C A B INDEPENDENT C 57

C 68.51 48 C 9.82 A 12.00 D 16.22 A 5 C 18.47 2014

Vijay Age: 41 yrs, Edu.: F.Y.B.Com (Appeared) Member: Ward Committee L P. Tandel Ward: L, Swadeshi Mill - Eye Hospital, Constituency No.: 164

56.62 11.86 3.10 12.58 5 18.65 2015 D 125 B F E A C

SS C 63.31 89 A 14.61 F 4.31 D 14.82 A 5 C 18.58 2014

Pranita Age: 51 yrs, Edu.: Upto SSC Member: Works Committee (City), Women and Child Welfare P. Waghdhare Ward: F/North, Area: Pratiksha Nagar - Sion, Constituency No.: 165 Committee, Ward Committee F/South and F/North

98 MUMBAI REPORT CARD MUNICIPAL COUNCILLORS 2015 99 NO. OF QUALITY OF LEAST CRIMINAL PERCEIVED TOTAL ATTENDANCE MUNICIPAL QUESTIONS QUESTIONS RECORD PERFORMANCE PARTY GRADE SCORE RANK COUNCILLOR Actual Actual * Actual Actual Actual % Grade Grade Grade Grade Grade out of 15 out of 10 out of 28 out of 5 out of 30

71.93 12.51 6.84 19.48 5 20.67 2015 B 22 A C C A C

INC C 69.56 40 A 12.78 B 10.74 C 17.03 A 5 C 18.01 2014

Lalita Age: 38 yrs, Edu.: Seventh Member: Public Health Committee, Ward Committee F/South K. Yadav Ward: F/North, Area: Salt Pans, Sion Transit Camp, Constituency No.: 166 and F/North

63.42 11.81 7.12 14.52 5 18.82 2015 C 84 B B D A C

BJP B 72.83 21 A 13.86 A 12.47 D 16.61 A 5 D 17.89 2014

Rajeshree Age: 37 yrs, Edu.: B.A.F.A, Ward: F/North, Area: Lokmanya Tilak Hospital - Member: Women and Child Welfare Committee, Education R. Shirwadkar Shanmukhanand Hall, Constituency No.: 167 Committee, Ward Committee F/South and F/North

56.74 5.39 2.51 15.30 5 21.07 2015 D 123 E F D A B

BJP C 69.12 43 B 10.60 C 9.42 C 19.18 A 5 D 17.92 2014

Selvan Age: 56 yrs, Edu.: HSC Member: Works Committee (City), Ward Committee F/South Shift: Attendance; No. of questions; R. Tamil Ward: F/North, Area: Raoli Hill, Constituency No.: 168 and F/North Quality of questions

74.26 11.49 7.80 19.70 5 21.59 2015 B 10 B B B A B

SS C 60.63 116 B 11.37 C 9.42 E 12.68 A 5 D 15.15 2014

Shradha Age: 50 yrs, Edu.: HSC, Ward: F/North, Member: Ward Committee F/South and F/North, Shift: Quality of questions; Perceived S. Jadhav Area: C.G.S. Colony - Sector - 7, Constituency No.: 169 Improvements Committee Performance

100 MUMBAI REPORT CARD MUNICIPAL COUNCILLORS 2015 101 NO. OF QUALITY OF LEAST CRIMINAL PERCEIVED TOTAL ATTENDANCE MUNICIPAL QUESTIONS QUESTIONS RECORD PERFORMANCE PARTY GRADE SCORE RANK COUNCILLOR Actual Actual * Actual Actual Actual % Grade Grade Grade Grade Grade out of 15 out of 10 out of 28 out of 5 out of 30

68.07 12.55 9.63 15.30 5 17.59 2015 C 46 A A D A D

SS C 68.39 49 A 14.32 B 11.61 D 14.12 A 5 D 17.35 2014

Trushna Age: 55 yrs, Edu.: Upto SSC, Ward: F/North, Member: Markets and Gardens Committee, Tree Committee, C. Vishwasrao Area: Antop Hill - C.G.S. Colony, Constituency No.: 170 Ward Committee F/South and F/North, Standing Committee

47.94 7.53 1.73 19.20 0 16.47 2015 E 182 D F C F D

BJP E 45.47 205 C 9.44 F 0.72 F 8.14 A 5 D 16.17 2014

Mahant Age: 54 yrs, Edu.: Ninth, Ward: F/North, Member: Works Committee (City), Ward Committee F/South R. Chaube Area: Sangam Nagar, Constituency No.: 171 and F/North

33.70 4.07 0.41 9.48 -5 20.30

2015 F F F F C INDEPENDENT F 212

F 33.59 218 E 5.42 F 0.72 F 8.67 F -5 D 16.78 2014

Manojkumar Age: 47 yrs, Edu.: B.Sc (Electronics) Member: Ward Committee F/South and F/North M. Sansare Ward: F/North, Area: Korba Mithagar - Wadala Salt Pans, Constituency No.: 172

47.00 13.83 1.05 6.10 5 17.02 2015 E 185 A F F A D

SS D 51.60 178 B 11.88 F 1.65 F 8.81 A 5 D 17.26 2014

Alka Age: 56 yrs, Edu.: SSC, Ward: F/North, Member: Works Committee (City), Ward Committee F/South H. Doke Area: Lepars Home-BPT Hospital Colony, Constituency No.: 173 and F/North

102 MUMBAI REPORT CARD MUNICIPAL COUNCILLORS 2015 103 NO. OF QUALITY OF LEAST CRIMINAL PERCEIVED TOTAL ATTENDANCE MUNICIPAL QUESTIONS QUESTIONS RECORD PERFORMANCE PARTY GRADE SCORE RANK COUNCILLOR Actual Actual * Actual Actual Actual % Grade Grade Grade Grade Grade out of 15 out of 10 out of 28 out of 5 out of 30

72.90 10.95 8.53 22.15 5 20.19 2015 B 14 B A B A C

INC D 59.06 125 B 11.21 D 8.96 E 11.32 A 5 D 15.58 2014

Nayna Age: 62 yrs, Edu.: SSC Member: Works Committee (City), Ward Committee F/South Shift: Quality of questions; Perceived M. Sheth Ward: F/North, Area: Hindu Colony - Parsi Colony, Constituency No.: 174 and F/North, Tree Committee Performance

53.83 11.12 1.05 14.00 5 16.67 2015 D 150 B F D A D

RPI (A) E 43.54 208 C 9.78 F 0.72 F 6.00 A 5 D 16.04 2014

Sabreddy Age: 47 yrs, Edu.: Upto Ninth Member: Markets and Gardens Committee, Shift: Attendance; No. of questions; M. Borra Ward: G/North, Area: Mahim Kala Killa, Constituency No.: 175 Ward Committee G/North Quality of questions

39.30 11.69 1.73 6.08 -5 17.80 2015 E 205 B F F F D

SS D 51.62 177 A 12.41 D 7.62 E 11.11 F -5 C 18.49 2014

Rajendra Age: 50 yrs, Edu.: SSC, Ward: G/North, Area: Kakkaiyadevi Temple () - Shift: No. of questions; Quality of Member: Works Committee (City), Ward Committee G/North N. Suryavanshi Khambadevi Nagar - Mukund Nagar, Constituency No.: 177 questions; Perceived Performance

53.97 11.67 3.10 9.75 5 16.00 2015 D 149 B F F A D

INC D 52.82 166 A 12.18 F 2.52 F 9.15 A 5 D 17.97 2014

Vakil S. Age: 36 yrs, Edu.: Eighth Member: Works Committee (City), Ward Committee G/North Ahmed Shaikh Ward: G/North, Area: Western India Tanneries, Constituency No.: 178

104 MUMBAI REPORT CARD MUNICIPAL COUNCILLORS 2015 105 NO. OF QUALITY OF LEAST CRIMINAL PERCEIVED TOTAL ATTENDANCE MUNICIPAL QUESTIONS QUESTIONS RECORD PERFORMANCE PARTY GRADE SCORE RANK COUNCILLOR Actual Actual * Actual Actual Actual % Grade Grade Grade Grade Grade out of 15 out of 10 out of 28 out of 5 out of 30

42.74 6.42 0.41 6.08 5 19.84 2015 E 197 E F F A C

SP F 33.19 221 D 7.80 F 0.00 F 0.00 A 5 D 15.39 2014

Jyotsna Age: 34 yrs, Edu.: Fifth, Ward: G/North, Area: Mahim Sonapur - Dharavi Member: Works Committee (City), Women and Child Welfare Shift: Quality of questions; Perceived H. Parmar Kumbharwada, Constituency No.: 179 Committee, Ward Committee G/North Performance

52.28 11.41 2.51 6.16 5 20.20

2015 B F F A C INDEPENDENT D 160

D 56.91 139 B 11.94 F 5.04 E 11.71 A 5 D 16.22 2014

Vishnu Age: 60 yrs, Edu.: Eleventh, Ward: G/North, Area: Estrella Battery Company - Rajarshi Member: Public Health Committee, Ward Committee G/North R. Gaikwad Shahu Nagar, Constituency No.: 180

50.25 9.96 0.41 10.18 5 16.26 2015 D 171 C F E A D

MNS C 67.05 63 A 13.60 F 5.04 C 18.51 A 5 C 18.90 2014 Shift: Attendance; No. of questions; Shraddha Age: 38 yrs, Edu.: HSC, Ward: G/North Member: Markets and Gardens Committee, Women and Child Quality of questions; Perceived Area: Mahim Creek, Mahim Police Quarters, Mahim Killa, Constituency No.: 181 Welfare Committee, Ward Committee G/North R. Patil Performance

57.63 13.47 1.73 11.26 5 19.17 2015 D 116 A F E A C

MNS E 48.14 194 A 14.23 F 0.72 F 3.11 A 5 C 18.08 2014

Virendra Age: 50 yrs, Edu.: SSC, Ward: G/North Member: Works Committee (City), Ward Committee G/North, Shift: No. of questions; Quality of V. Tandel Area: Shitaladevi Temple - Hinduja Hospital, Constituency No.: 182 Tree Committee questions

106 MUMBAI REPORT CARD MUNICIPAL COUNCILLORS 2015 107 NO. OF QUALITY OF LEAST CRIMINAL PERCEIVED TOTAL ATTENDANCE MUNICIPAL QUESTIONS QUESTIONS RECORD PERFORMANCE PARTY GRADE SCORE RANK COUNCILLOR Actual Actual * Actual Actual Actual % Grade Grade Grade Grade Grade out of 15 out of 10 out of 28 out of 5 out of 30

50.81 10.96 3.60 16.40 -5 17.86 2015 D 169 B E D F D

MNS D 52.70 169 A 13.23 F 5.04 E 13.02 F -5 C 20.41 2014

Manish Age: 44 yrs, Edu.: Fourteenth, Ward: G/North Member: Works Committee (City), Law, Revenue and General D. Chavan Area: Ruparel College - Workshop, Constituency No.: 183 Purposes Committee, Ward Committee G/North

72.03 6.90 7.12 20.33 5 21.83 2015 B 21 E B B A B

MNS B 74.51 13 C 9.03 A 13.26 A 22.61 A 5 D 17.62 2014

Sudhir Age: 50 yrs, Edu.: SSC, Ward: G/North, Area: Kamgar Krida Kenra, Member: Ward Committee G/North K. Jadhav Railway Station, Constituency No.: 184

53.41 11.89 7.53 12.51 -10 19.62 2015 D 152 B B E F C

MNS D 58.33 128 B 10.84 D 8.96 B 20.69 F -5 D 16.84 2014

Sandeep (Yashwant) Age: 41 yrs, Edu.: M.A., Ward: G/North Member: BEST Committee, Ward Committee G/North, S. Deshpande Area: Ravindra Natya Mandir - , Constituency No.: 185 Standing Committee

45.36 7.75 0.41 7.82 5 18.37 2015 E 189 D F F A C

MNS C 60.33 118 C 9.61 F 3.45 C 18.45 A 5 D 16.83 2014

Seema Age: 30 yrs, Edu.: B.Sc., Ward: G/South, Area: S.T. Depot, Shift: Attendance; No. of questions; Member: Ward Committee G/South M. Shivalkar Weatern Railway Workshop, Constituency No.: 186 Quality of questions

108 MUMBAI REPORT CARD MUNICIPAL COUNCILLORS 2015 109 NO. OF QUALITY OF LEAST CRIMINAL PERCEIVED TOTAL ATTENDANCE MUNICIPAL QUESTIONS QUESTIONS RECORD PERFORMANCE PARTY GRADE SCORE RANK COUNCILLOR Actual Actual * Actual Actual Actual % Grade Grade Grade Grade Grade out of 15 out of 10 out of 28 out of 5 out of 30

69.91 11.58 6.52 19.21 5 20.16 2015 C 36 B C C A C

MNS B 73.39 18 A 12.00 B 10.74 C 18.87 A 5 C 19.77 2014

Santosh Age: 45 yrs, Edu.: HSC, Ward: G/South Member: Works Committee (City), Public Health Committee, B. Dhuri Area: T.V.Centre - Prabhadevi, Constituency No.: 187 Ward Committee G/South

76.18 13.59 9.04 19.52 5 19.57 2015 B 4 A A C A C

SS B 78.43 2 A 15.00 A 13.47 C 18.12 A 5 C 19.84 2014

Hemangi Age: 42 yrs, Edu.: B.A., Ward: G/South, Member: Law, Revenue and General Purposes Committee, H. Worlikar Area: Village, Constituency No.: 188 Ward Committee G/South

59.44 10.13 4.10 13.65 5 20.56 2015 D 108 C E E A C

SS D 58.47 127 C 9.69 F 3.45 D 14.72 A 5 C 18.61 2014

Mansi Age: 42 yrs, Edu.: Thirteenth, Ward: G/South Member: Public Health Committee, Improvements M. Dalvi Area: Worli dairy - Sasmira, Constituency No.: 189 Committee, Ward Committee G/South

46.55 7.20 0.41 6.00 5 21.95 2015 E 186 E F F A B

MNS E 36.89 216 D 7.85 F 0.00 F 0.00 A 5 C 19.04 2014

Hemlata Age: 45 yrs, Edu.: Ninth, Ward: G/South, Shift: Quality of questions; Perceived Member: Works Committee (City), Ward Committee G/South V. Wange Area: Worli B.D.D. Chawls, Constituency No.: 190 Performance

110 MUMBAI REPORT CARD MUNICIPAL COUNCILLORS 2015 111 NO. OF QUALITY OF LEAST CRIMINAL PERCEIVED TOTAL ATTENDANCE MUNICIPAL QUESTIONS QUESTIONS RECORD PERFORMANCE PARTY GRADE SCORE RANK COUNCILLOR Actual Actual * Actual Actual Actual % Grade Grade Grade Grade Grade out of 15 out of 10 out of 28 out of 5 out of 30

51.67 10.37 7.12 13.12 -10 20.33 2015 D 162 C B E F C

SS D 53.22 163 B 11.98 B 11.28 D 16.02 F -10 D 16.93 2014

Kishori Age: 52 yrs, Edu.: SSC.: HSC, Ward: G/South Member: Works Committee (City), Standing Committee, K. Pednekar Area: Gandhi Nagar - Dawn Mills, Constituency No.: 191 Ward Committee G/South

67.87 10.35 7.12 21.23 5 19.17 2015 C 49 C B B A C

NCP C 65.52 76 B 11.81 D 8.96 D 15.58 A 5 C 18.18 2014 Member: Works Committee (City), Law, Revenue and Ratna Age: 45 yrs, Edu.: B.A., L.L.B (Appeared), Ward: G/South, General Purposes Committee, Education Committee, Area: Mahalaxmi Race Course - Nehru Tarangan, Constituency No.: 192 R. Mahale Ward Committee G/South

63.64 10.62 4.10 21.06 5 18.85 2015 C 81 B E B A C

NCP C 69.72 37 A 14.31 C 9.42 C 18.06 A 5 D 16.93 2014

Sunil Age: 39 yrs, Edu.: Eighth, Ward: G/South Member: Works Committee (City), Ward Committee G/South Shift: Attendance; No. of questions M. Ahir Area: Shanti Nagar - Arthur Road Jail, Constituency No.: 193

67.67 10.96 8.17 11.07 5 24.03 2015 C 51 B A E A A

INC D 52.57 170 B 10.93 F 2.52 F 6.00 A 5 B 21.12 2014

Sunil Age: 53 yrs, Edu.: B.Com, L.L.B. (General), Ward: F/South, Member: Works Committee (City), Ward Committee F/South Shift: No. of questions, Quality of V. More Area: Ranjeet Studio - Naigaon B.D.D. Chawls, Constituency No.: 195 and F/North, BEST Committee questions; Perceived Performance

112 MUMBAI REPORT CARD MUNICIPAL COUNCILLORS 2015 113 NO. OF QUALITY OF LEAST CRIMINAL PERCEIVED TOTAL ATTENDANCE MUNICIPAL QUESTIONS QUESTIONS RECORD PERFORMANCE PARTY GRADE SCORE RANK COUNCILLOR Actual Actual * Actual Actual Actual % Grade Grade Grade Grade Grade out of 15 out of 10 out of 28 out of 5 out of 30

45.64 10.90 2.51 6.00 5 19.23 2015 E 187 B F F A C

INC E 48.59 193 A 12.11 F 0.72 F 6.00 A 5 C 19.76 2014

Pallavi Age: 42 yrs, Edu.: Ninth, Ward: F/South, Member: Markets and Gardens Committee, Ward Committee M. Mungekar Area: Naigaum Police Parade Ground, B.P.T. Hospital, Constituency No.: 196 F/South and F/North

61.27 13.53 5.29 13.52 5 19.93 2015 C 97 A D E A C

SS C 66.93 65 A 13.69 D 8.49 C 17.01 A 5 D 15.74 2014

Nandkishor Age: 54 yrs, Edu.: B.Com, Ward: F/South Member: Works Committee (City), Ward Committee F/South Shift: No. of questions, Quality of S. Vichare Area: Mahatma Gandhi Vasahat - Bhoiwada, Constituency No.: 197 and F/North, Tree Committee questions

31.20 5.77 1.05 6.00 -10 20.90 2015 F 215 E F F F C

SS F 32.68 222 E 7.42 F 2.52 F 6.00 F -10 C 19.75 2014

Sanjay (Nana) Age: 52 yrs, Edu.: SSC, Ward: F/South, Member: Works Committee (City), Ward Committee F/South G. Ambole Area: India United Mills - Nare Park, Constituency No.: 198 and F/North

74.55 12.84 7.12 20.15 5 23.13 2015 B 8 A B B A B

SS C 68.27 51 A 12.80 D 8.16 C 17.94 A 5 C 18.36 2014

Hemangi Age: 54 yrs, Edu.: SSC, Ward: F/South, Area: K.E.M. Hospital - Raj Kamal Member: Markets and Gardens Committee, Ward Committee Shift: Quality of questions; Perceived H. Chemburkar Studio - Mahatma Gandhi Hospital, Constituency No.: 199 F/South and F/North Performance

114 MUMBAI REPORT CARD MUNICIPAL COUNCILLORS 2015 115 NO. OF QUALITY OF LEAST CRIMINAL PERCEIVED TOTAL ATTENDANCE MUNICIPAL QUESTIONS QUESTIONS RECORD PERFORMANCE PARTY GRADE SCORE RANK COUNCILLOR Actual Actual * Actual Actual Actual % Grade Grade Grade Grade Grade out of 15 out of 10 out of 28 out of 5 out of 30

63.39 12.37 4.70 18.73 5 20.60 2015 C 85 A E C A C

SS C 61.24 108 B 11.88 F 5.04 E 13.53 A 5 C 19.79 2014

Vaibhavi Age: 31 yrs, Edu.: SSC, Ward: F/South, Member: Works Committee (City), Ward Committee F/South V. Chavan Area: Veternary Hospital - Abhyuday Nagar, Constituency No.: 200 and F/North

39.87 7.44 0.41 6.00 5 19.02 2015 E 204 E F F A C

SS D 51.19 181 C 10.43 F 0.72 F 8.67 A 5 C 20.37 2014

Shweta Age: 44 yrs, Edu.: B.A., Ward: F/South Member: Works Committee (City), Women and Child Welfare Shift: Attendance; Quality of questions S. Rane Area: Cotton Green-, Constituency No.: 201 Committee, Ward Committee F/South and F/North

69.90 12.04 5.84 18.21 5 21.35 2015 C 37 A D C A B

MNS C 63.95 86 A 14.28 E 6.11 E 10.51 A 5 B 21.05 2014

Samita Age: 48 yrs, Edu.: SSC, Ward: E, Area: Veer Jijamata Udyan - Ghodapdeo - Member: Works Committee (City), Education Committee, Ward Shift: Quality of questions S. Naik Mazgaon Dock (North), Constituency No.: 202 Committee A, B and E

63.99 14.37 8.72 17.38 -5 20.44 2015 C 79 A A C F C

SS C 60.67 115 A 13.63 A 13.47 E 11.86 F -5 C 19.70 2014

Ramakant Age: 56 yrs, Edu.: SSC, Ward: E, Member: Law, Revenue and General Purposes Committee, S. Rahate Area: Kasturba Hospital - India United Mill, Constituency No.: 203 Standing Committee, Ward Committee A, B and E

116 MUMBAI REPORT CARD MUNICIPAL COUNCILLORS 2015 117 NO. OF QUALITY OF LEAST CRIMINAL PERCEIVED TOTAL ATTENDANCE MUNICIPAL QUESTIONS QUESTIONS RECORD PERFORMANCE PARTY GRADE SCORE RANK COUNCILLOR Actual Actual * Actual Actual Actual % Grade Grade Grade Grade Grade out of 15 out of 10 out of 28 out of 5 out of 30

48.63 11.73 0.41 6.53 5 21.95 2015 E 179 B F F A B

ABS D 53.28 162 B 10.88 F 0.72 E 12.95 A 5 D 17.72 2014

Vandana Age: 43 yrs, Edu.: Upto SSC, Ward: E, Member: Works Committee (City), P. Gawli Area: Byculla Railway Station - Municipal Colony, Constituency No.: 204 Ward Committee A, B and E, Improvements Committee

39.04 4.69 1.05 6.05 5 20.24 2015 E 207 F F F A C

ABS E 49.44 189 F 4.68 E 6.11 F 7.23 A 5 C 19.43 2014

Geeta Age: 31 yrs, Edu.: SSC, Ward: E Member: Public Health Committee, Shift: No. of questions; Quality of A. Gawli Area: Nair Hospital - Byculla Fire Brigade, Constituency No.: 205 Ward Committee A, B and E, Standing Committee questions

44.34 6.24 3.10 6.05 5 19.94 2015 E 194 E F F A C

INC E 41.57 211 E 6.64 F 1.65 F 6.00 A 5 D 16.27 2014

Faiyaz Age: 53 yrs, Edu.: S.Y.B.A., Ward: E, Member: Law, Revenue and General Purposes Committee, A. Khan Area: Mazgaon Court - Madanpura, Constituency No.: 206 Ward Committee A, B and E, Education Committee

55.46 7.08 3.10 9.73 5 20.69 2015 D 136 E F F A C

SS C 65.95 73 B 11.38 B 11.28 D 14.24 A 5 D 17.05 2014

Yamini Age: 47 yrs, Edu.: B.Com, Ward: E, Member: Markets and Gardens Committee, Ward Committee Shift: Attendance; No. of questions, Y. Jadhav Area: Anjirwadi, Dockyard - Mazgaon Dock (South), Constituency No.: 207 A, B and E, Education Committee Quality of questions

118 MUMBAI REPORT CARD MUNICIPAL COUNCILLORS 2015 119 NO. OF QUALITY OF LEAST CRIMINAL PERCEIVED TOTAL ATTENDANCE MUNICIPAL QUESTIONS QUESTIONS RECORD PERFORMANCE PARTY GRADE SCORE RANK COUNCILLOR Actual Actual * Actual Actual Actual % Grade Grade Grade Grade Grade out of 15 out of 10 out of 28 out of 5 out of 30

74.33 12.79 7.53 20.18 5 21.39 2015 B 9 A B B A B

INC C 61.42 106 A 12.99 D 8.49 E 13.24 A 5 E 14.70 2014

Manoj Age: 46 yrs, Edu.: HSC, I.T.I. Electrician Trade, Library Science, Ward: E, Member: Markets and Gardens Committee, Law, Revenue and Shift: Quality of questions; Perceived P. Jamsutkar Area: Mastan Talao - J.J. Hospital - Vikrikar Bhavan, Constituency No.: 208 General Purposes Committee, Ward Committee A, B and E Performance

48.83 10.34 1.73 9.20 5 18.55 2015 E 177 C F F A C

INC E 44.69 206 C 9.04 F 2.52 F 6.00 A 5 D 17.13 2014

Shahana Age: 51 yrs, Edu.: Seventh, Ward: E Member: Women and Child Welfare Committee, R. Khan Area: , Constituency No.: 209 Ward Committee A, B and E

76.98 14.49 7.80 18.98 5 20.08 2015 B 2 A B C A C

INC B 75.46 9 A 15.00 B 11.28 B 20.35 A 5 D 16.83 2014

Noshir Age: 68 yrs, Edu.: B.Sc., Ward: D, Member: Works Committee (City), Ward Committee C and D, R. Mehta Area: Bellasis chawls - Navjeevan Society, Constituency No.: 210 Improvements Committee

55.56 12.31 6.84 12.12 -2 17.83 2015 D 135 A C E F D

SS C 61.49 105 A 14.67 A 12.47 E 13.89 F -2 D 16.47 2014

Arvind Age: 55 yrs, Edu.: Upto SSC, Ward: D, Member: Works Committee (City), Ward Committee C and D, Shift: Attendance; No. of questions D. Dudhwadkar Area: Wellington Sport Club - Bhatia Hospital, Constituency No.: 211 BEST Committee

120 MUMBAI REPORT CARD MUNICIPAL COUNCILLORS 2015 121 NO. OF QUALITY OF LEAST CRIMINAL PERCEIVED TOTAL ATTENDANCE MUNICIPAL QUESTIONS QUESTIONS RECORD PERFORMANCE PARTY GRADE SCORE RANK COUNCILLOR Actual Actual * Actual Actual Actual % Grade Grade Grade Grade Grade out of 15 out of 10 out of 28 out of 5 out of 30

68.71 11.10 5.29 20.11 5 18.76 2015 C 44 B D B A C

BJP C 67.62 57 A 12.44 E 6.11 C 18.42 A 5 C 18.65 2014

Sarita Age: 38 yrs, Edu.: B.Com, Ward: D, Member: Works Committee (City), Ward Committee C and D A. Patil Area: Mahalaxmi - Air Condition Market - Umar Park, Constituency No.: 212

60.97 12.06 5.29 19.60 5 17.01 2015 C 99 A D B A D

SS B 74.93 11 A 12.35 A 13.34 B 19.76 A 5 D 17.49 2014

Anil Age: 40 yrs, Edu.: SSC, Ward: D Member: Works Committee (City), Ward Committee C and D Shift: No. of questions S. Singh Area: Priyadarshani Park - August Kranti Maidan, Constituency No.: 213

50.94 13.38 2.51 7.50 5 16.70 2015 D 168 A F F A D

BJP C 62.86 95 A 12.75 D 7.62 E 13.85 A 5 D 16.64 2014

Jyotshna Age: 54 yrs, Edu.: HSC, Ward: D, Shift: No. of questions; Quality of Member: Works Committee (City), Ward Committee C and D D. Mehta Area: Kamala Nehru Udyan - Rajbhavan, Constituency No.: 214 questions

56.85 11.76 4.70 20.75 -5 20.20 2015 D 122 B E B F C

SS E 44.17 207 A 13.04 F 3.45 F 9.00 F -5 D 16.68 2014

Surendra Age: 57 yrs, Edu.: HSC, Ward: D, Member: Works Committee (City), Ward Committee C and D, Shift: No. of questions; Quality of R. Bagalkar Area: Prarthana Samaj - Opera House, Constituency No.: 215 Improvements Committee questions; Perceived Performance

122 MUMBAI REPORT CARD MUNICIPAL COUNCILLORS 2015 123 NO. OF QUALITY OF LEAST CRIMINAL PERCEIVED TOTAL ATTENDANCE MUNICIPAL QUESTIONS QUESTIONS RECORD PERFORMANCE PARTY GRADE SCORE RANK COUNCILLOR Actual Actual * Actual Actual Actual % Grade Grade Grade Grade Grade out of 15 out of 10 out of 28 out of 5 out of 30

62.63 12.66 2.51 18.25 5 19.06 2015 C 89 A F C A C

INC D 53.20 164 A 12.08 F 3.45 E 11.82 A 5 D 16.85 2014

Shantilal Age: 54 yrs, Edu.: Eighth, Ward: D, Shift: Quality of questions; Perceived Member: Works Committee (City), Ward Committee C and D C. Doshi Area: Harkisandas N. Hospital - Khetwadi, Constituency No.: 216 Performance

66.10 12.45 4.10 20.02 5 18.09 2015 C 59 A E B A C

SS D 56.51 142 A 13.67 F 3.45 E 10.57 A 5 D 16.83 2014

Yugandara Age: 45 yrs, Edu.: B.A., Ward: C Shift: Quality of questions; Perceived Member: Works Committee (City), Ward Committee C and D Y. Salekar Area: Durgadevi Udyan - Madhav Baug - , Constituency No.: 217 Performance

59.85 14.44 4.70 17.14 5 14.57 2015 D 106 A E C A E

SS C 69.64 38 A 13.66 D 8.49 C 18.88 A 5 D 16.62 2014

Sampat Age: 47 yrs, Edu.: B.A., Ward: C, Member: Works Committee (City), Ward Committee C and D, Shift: No. of questions; Quality of S. Thakur Area: Chandanwadi, Chirabazar, Gymkhana, Constituency No.: 218 Improvements Committee questions; Perceived Performance

51.16 9.45 3.10 14.98 5 18.63 2015 D 167 C F D A C

BJP C 60.95 110 B 10.74 E 7.16 D 14.44 A 5 C 18.61 2014

Veena Age: 52 yrs, Edu.: Ninth, Ward: C, Member: Works Committee (City), Ward Committee C and D Shift: Attendance; No. of questions M. Jain Area: Mumbadevi - Mulji Jetha Market - Dhobi Talao, Constituency No.: 219

124 MUMBAI REPORT CARD MUNICIPAL COUNCILLORS 2015 125 NO. OF QUALITY OF LEAST CRIMINAL PERCEIVED TOTAL ATTENDANCE MUNICIPAL QUESTIONS QUESTIONS RECORD PERFORMANCE PARTY GRADE SCORE RANK COUNCILLOR Actual Actual * Actual Actual Actual % Grade Grade Grade Grade Grade out of 15 out of 10 out of 28 out of 5 out of 30

71.17 10.48 8.85 19.48 5 18.49 2015 B 28 C A C A C

SP C 68.92 46 C 10.18 C 9.42 B 20.22 A 5 D 17.11 2014

Yaqoob Age: 63 yrs, Edu.: F.Y.B.A., Ward: C, Member: Works Committee (City), Law, Revenue and General J. Memon Area: Khara Talao - Null Bazar - Ghoghari Mohalla, Constituency No.: 220 Purposes Committee, Ward Committee C and D, BEST Committee

35.66 0.66 3.10 6.00 0 19.90 2015 E 209 F F F F C

INC D 57.51 134 F 3.77 F 5.04 C 19.00 A 5 D 17.70 2014

Dnyanraj Age: 53 yrs, Edu.: SSC, Ward: B Member: Ward Committee A, B and E, Standing Committee, Shift: Attendance; No. of questions; Y. Nikam Area: Imamwada - Dongri, Constituency No.: 221 Tree Committee Quality of questions

56.59 9.51 4.10 11.09 5 20.07 2015 D 126 C E E A C

INC C 61.70 102 A 12.62 E 6.11 D 14.93 A 5 D 16.05 2014

Waqarunnisa Age: 64 yrs, Edu.: SSC, H.T.C., Ward: B, Member: Works Committee (City), Ward Committee A, B and E Ansari Area: Bengalipura - Princess Dock, Constituency No.: 222

64.44 11.47 6.52 13.77 5 18.25 2015 C 76 B C E A C

INC C 67.64 56 A 12.86 C 10.22 D 14.73 A 5 D 17.84 2014

Javed Age: 38 yrs, Edu.: HSC, Ward: B, Member: Works Committee (City), Ward Committee A, B and E I. Juneja Area: Musafir Khana - Victoria Docks, Constituency No.: 223

126 MUMBAI REPORT CARD MUNICIPAL COUNCILLORS 2015 127 NO. OF QUALITY OF LEAST CRIMINAL PERCEIVED TOTAL ATTENDANCE MUNICIPAL QUESTIONS QUESTIONS RECORD PERFORMANCE PARTY GRADE SCORE RANK COUNCILLOR Actual Actual * Actual Actual Actual % Grade Grade Grade Grade Grade out of 15 out of 10 out of 28 out of 5 out of 30

49.60 11.44 1.73 15.00 -2 19.98 2015 E 175 B F D F C

SS C 66.62 68 A 12.60 C 9.42 B 21.51 F -2 C 19.09 2014

Ganesh Age: 35 yrs, Edu.: Ninth, Ward: A, Area: Mahatma Phule Member: Markets and Gardens Committee, Ward Committee Shift: No. of questions; Quality of Y. Sanap Market - Churchgate - Museum - Indira Dock, Constituency No.: 224 A, B and E, BEST Committee questions

61.67 11.23 7.12 14.05 5 21.28 2015 C 96 B B D A B

E 46.79 200 A 12.34 F 1.65 F 6.57 A 5 D 16.23

INC 2014

Sushama Age: 33 yrs, Edu.: Upto SSC, Ward: A, Area: , Member: Public Health Committee, Shift: No. of questions; Quality of A. Salunkhe Market - , Constituency No.: 225 Ward Committee A, B and E questions; Perceived Performance

45.38 9.01 0.41 10.98 5 17.98 2015 E 188 C F E A D

INC E 42.63 210 B 11.33 F 0.00 F 0.00 A 5 C 19.29 2014

Anita Age: 46 yrs, Edu.: HSC, Ward: A, Area: Sassoon Dock, Member: Works Committee (City), Ward Committee A, B and E R. Yadav World Trade Centre, Geeta Nagar, Constituency No.: 226

56.56 7.18 8.72 15.10 5 18.56

2015 E A D A C Independent D 127

D 59.46 121 C 10.38 D 7.62 E 11.71 A 5 C 18.74 2014

Makarand Age: 36 yrs, Edu.: B.com, L.L.B. Ward: A, Member: Law, Revenue and General Purposes Committee, S. Narvekar Area: R.C. Church - Colaba Dandi - Navy Nagar, Constituency No.: 227 Ward Committee A, B and E, Education Committee

128 MUMBAI REPORT CARD MUNICIPAL COUNCILLORS 2015 129 cegK³e efJeMues

Note: Number of Councillors who were ranked in 2013 are 226, in 2014 are 225 & IN 2015 ARE 220 Questions Asked 2013 Overall Grade 120 90 A - 100% to 80% marks 118(52%) 2014 85(38%) B - Less than 80% to 70% marks 102(45%) 2015 81(36%) C - Less than 70% to 60% marks 105(48%) 80 D - Less than 60% to 50% marks E - Less than 50% to 35% marks 100 Avg. Score 72(32%) F - Less than 35% marks 58.6% in 2013, 70(32%) 70 59.4% in 2014 80(36%) & 58.1% in 67(30%) 2015 80 66(29%) 79(36%)

60 69(31%)

50 60 42(19%) 40 37(17%) 34(15%) 40 Number of Councillors

Number of Councillors 34(15%) 32(14%) 30 28(12%)

20 17(8%) 14(6%) 20 13(6%) 10(4%) 13(6%) 9(4%) 8(4%) 6(3%) 6(3%) 7(3%) 11(5%) 14(6%) 8(4%) 1(0.44%) 10 0 1(0.44%) 3(1%) 0 1 2 to 10 11 to 30 31 to 50 Above 50 0(0%) 0(0%) 0 Number of Question A B C D E F

143(63 %) Attendance Proportion of Questions Asked by Councillors A - 100% to 80% attendance 179(79%) 150 B - Less than 80% to 70% attendance 180 Compared to Citizen's Complaints C - Less than 70% to 60% attendance 140 D - Less than 60% to 50% attendance 130 D - Less than 50% to 35% attendance 160 F - Less than 35% attendance A - 100% to 80% marks 139(62%) 120 B - Less than 80% to 70% marks 102(45%) 125(57%) Avg. Score 140 C - Less than 70% to 60% marks Avg. Score 110 D - Less than 60% to 50% marks 80.6% in 2013, 20.8% in 100 75.4% in 2014 E - Less than 50% to 35% marks 2013, 26.9% 120 in 2014 & & 68% in 2015 F - Less than 35% marks 29.1% in 2015 90 80 65(30%) 100 70 51(23%) 80 63(29%) 60 50(22%) Number of Councillors Number of Councillors 50 41(19%) 60 52(23%) 40 (18%) 40 36(16%) 30(13%) 28(12%) 25(11%) 25(11%) 40 27(12%) 30 21(9%) 23(10%) 13(6%) 20 14(6%) 9(4%) 20 3(1%) 8(4%) 9(4%) 6(3%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 10 5(2%) 0(0%) 3(1%) 1(0.44%) 1(0.44%) 5(2%) 0 0 A B C D E F A B C D E F Grade Grade

130 MUMBAI REPORT CARD MUNICIPAL COUNCILLORS 2015 131

179(79%) Least Criminal Record 120 Awareness & Accessibility 120(53%) 175(78%) A - 100% to 80% marks 180 B - Less than 80% to 70% marks A - 100% to 80% marks 163(74%) C - Less than 70% to 60% marks B - Less than 80% to 70% marks D - Less than 60% to 50% marks 160 C - Less than 70% to 60% marks E - Less than 50% to 35% marks 100 Avg Score D - Less than 60% to 50% marks F - Less than 35% marks E - Less than 50% to 35% marks 64.7% in 2013, F - Less than 35% marks 140 62.5% in 2014 & 56.6% in 81(36%) 80 Avg. Score 2015

48.6% in 2013, 120 71(31%) 35.3% in 2014 70(32%) & 51.8% in 100 Number of Municipal Councillors with: 60 2015 56(25%) FIRs as per Affidavit February 2012 32 80 New FIRs Registered as on 31st December 2014 30 41(19%) 54(25%) Number of Councillors Charge sheeted as on 31st December 2014 40 40 38(17%) 37(17%) 37(17%) Number of Councillors 60 47(21%) 32(14%) 44(19%) 26(12%) 40 21(10%) 21(9%) 20 14(6%) 20 0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 3(1%) 3(1%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 3(1%) 0(0%) 1(0.44%) 2(1%) 0(0%) 3(1%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 0 0 A B C D E F A B C D E F Grade Grade

Perceived Performance Gender - wise Analysis (2015) A - 100% to 80% marks 139(63%) B - Less than 80% to 70% marks 140 A - 100% to 80% marks 126(56%) C - Less than 70% to 60% marks D - Less than 60% to 50% marks 50 B - Less than 80% to 70% marks C - Less than 70% to 60% marks 119(53%) E - Less than 50% to 35% marks Avg. Score D - Less than 60% to 50% marks 66.4% in 2013, F - Less than 35% marks Female (116) 120 45 E - Less than 50% to 35% marks 58.6% in 2014 39(33%) F - Less than 35% marks & 65.3% in Male (104)

2015 40 34(32%) 100 33(28%) 31(30%) Avg. Marks of 35 Avg. Marks of Male 59.66 in 84(37%) Female 2013, 59.40 in 80 57.62% in 2014 & 58.19% 2013, 59.41% in 2015 67(30%) 30 in 2014 & 23(19%) 58% in 2015 60 25 43(20%) 19(18%) Number of Councillors 33(15%) 20 14(13%) 40 34(15%) 15(13%)

Number of Councillors (225) 15

11(5%) 6(6%) 20 10 5(4%) 4(2%) 4(2%) 1(0.45%) 0(0%) 0(0%)

4(2%) 2(1%) 0(0%) 1(1%) 0(0%) 5 0(0%) 0 A B C D E F

Grade 0 A B C Grade D E F

132 MUMBAI REPORT CARD MUNICIPAL COUNCILLORS 2015 133 Party - Wise Grade (2015) Party - wise Average Rank (2015) 85 193 80 200 A - 100% to 80% marks 75 70 B - Less than 80% to 70% marks 67 180 70 C - Less than 70% to 60% marks 157 D - Less than 60% to 50% marks 160 150

65 E - Less than 50% to 35% marks 60 136 F - Less than 35% marks 140 131 55 50 120 109 102 102 104 45 97 37 100 40

34 Rank 35 80 27 30 60 Number of Councillors (220) 25 15 16 40 20 15 12 12 13 13 15 10 11 9 9 20 10 5 4 5 4 6 4 5 3 3 3 2 1 2 2 3 3 2 2 3 2 2 5 1 1 1 1 0 Akhil Bharatiya Bhartiya Independent Indian Maharashtra Nationalist Republican Samajwadi Shiv Sena 0 Bharatiya Janata Party Republican (14) National Navnirman Congress Party Of Party (9) (72) Akhil Bharatiya Bhartiya Independent Indian Maharashtra Nationalist Republican Samajwadi Shiv Sena 220 Sena (2) (30) Party Congress Sena (27) Party (13) India RPI(A) Bharatiya Janata Party Republican (14) National Navnirman Congress Party Of Party (9) (72) Councillors Bahujan (51) (1) Sena (2) (30) Party Congress Sena (27) Party India RPI(A) Mahasangha Bahujan (51) (13) (1) (1) Mahasangha (1) Political Party Political Party

Party - wise Average Score (2015)

Average Score of 220 70.00 Councillors 58.09%

61.03 59.60 59.17 58.41 59.56 60.00 54.34 53.22 52.58 53.83

50.00 43.83

40.00

Score 30.00

20.00

10.00

0.00 Akhil Bharatiya Bhartiya Independent Indian Maharashtra Nationalist Republican Samajwadi Shiv Sena Bharatiya Janata Party Republican (14) National Navnirman Congress Party Of Party (9) (72) Sena (2) (30) Party Congress (51) Sena (27) Party (13) India RPI(A) Bahujan (1) Mahasangha (1) Political Party

134 MUMBAI REPORT CARD MUNICIPAL COUNCILLORS 2015 135 Top 10 Councillors Top 10 Councillors in Attendance

Overall Rank Overall Rank Constituency Political Score Constituency Political Score Ward No. Party Councillors (out of 100) 2014 2015 Ward No. Party Councillors (out of 15) 2014 2015 R/S 22 BJP Sunita Ramnagina Yadav 80.87 6 1 K/E 68 SS Anant Bhiku Nar 15.00 62 75

D 210 INC Noshir Rusi Mehta 76.98 9 2 L 162 SS Anuradha Mahesh Pednekar 14.91 14 50

R/S 25 INC Ajanta Rajpati Yadav 76.57 29 3 M/W 147 INC Anil Ramchandra Patankar 14.82 32 31

G/S 188 SS Hemangi Hareshwar Worlikar 76.18 2 4 H/E 88 SS Deepak Ramchandra Bhutkar 14.55 23 29

P/N 40 BJP Gyanmurti Ramchandra Sharma 75.73 3 5 D 210 INC Noshir Rusi Mehta 14.49 9 2 H/E 89 SS Anil Pandurang Trimbakkar 14.48 52 20 L 160 SS Sanjana Kishor Mungekar 75.65 22 6 C 218 SS Sampat Sudam Thakur 14.44 38 106 K/W 60 SS Sanjay Kashinath Pawar 75.02 5 7 E 203 SS Ramakant Sakharam Rahate 14.37 115 79 SS Hemangi Hemantkumar 74.55 8 F/S 199 51 Chemburkar P/N 39 SS Sayali Sunil Warise 14.32 165 72

E 208 INC Manoj Pandurang Jamsutkar 74.33 106 9 K/W 58 SS Jyoti Jitendra Sutar 14.22 90 78 F/N 169 SS Shradha Shridhar Jadhav 74.26 116 10

Bottom 10 Councillors Bottom 10 Councillors in Attendance

Overall Rank Overall Rank Constituency Political Score Constituency Political Score Ward No. Party Councillors (out of 100) 2014 2015 Ward No. Party Councillors (out of 15) 2014 2015 S 116 MNS Avinash Bhaskar Sawant 25.37 225 220 B 221 INC Dnyanraj Yashvant Nikam 0.66 134 209

K/W 53 IND Changez Jamal Multani 27.88 217 219 M/W 142 INC Seema Rajendra Mahulkar 1.43 191 213 INC Mohammed Tanveer Mohammed 30.73 218 M/E 134 SS Rahul Ramesh Shevale 2.55 160 208 H/W 97 168 Ali Patel INC Mohammed Tanveer Mohammed 2.86 218 H/W 97 168 H/E 82 MNS Sukhada Rahul Pawar 30.76 138 217 Ali Patel N 120 NCP Pratiksha Raju Ghuge 3.01 210 M/E 139 SS Dinesh Harishchandra Panchal 30.79 204 216 192 N 128 MNS Mangal Prameshwar Kadam 3.01 223 211 F/S 198 SS Sanjay (Nana) Gajanan Ambole 31.20 222 215 P/N 42 MNS Deepak Pandurang Pawar 3.67 67 170 P/N 37 SS Manisha Sadashiv Patil 32.87 209 214 L 155 IND Lalita Annamalai 3.87 219 201 M/W 142 INC Seema Rajendra Mahulkar 32.99 191 213 F/N 172 IND Manojkumar Martandrao Sansare 4.07 218 212 F/N 172 IND Manojkumar Martandrao Sansare 33.70 218 212 S 115 NCP Chandan Chittaranjan Sharma 4.11 141 124 N 128 MNS Mangal Prameshwar Kadam 34.05 223 211

136 MUMBAI REPORT CARD MUNICIPAL COUNCILLORS 2015 137 Top 10 Councillors in Questions Asked Top 10 Councillors in Quality of Questions Asked

Overall Rank Overall Rank No. of Constituency Political Score Constituency Political question Ward No. Party Councillors (out of 28) 2014 2015 Ward No. Party Councillors asked 2014 2015 F/N 174 INC Nayna Manhar Sheth 22.15 125 14 L 161 NCP Saeeda Arif Khan 101 83 25 R/C 13 MNS Chetan Chandrakant Kadam 22.05 176 58 P/N 42 MNS Deepak Pandurang Pawar 95 67 170 S 104 INC Suresh Harishchandra Koparkar 21.64 158 77 R/S 21 INC Ramashish Gopal Gupta 85 4 12 M/W 144 BJP Rajshree Shripat Palande 21.27 12 26 P/N 31 INC Parminder Ratansingh Bhamra 69 39 56 G/S 192 NCP Ratna Raghunath Mahale 21.23 76 49 L 162 SS Anuradha Mahesh Pednekar 68 14 50 G/S 193 NCP Sunil Mohan Ahir 21.06 37 81 K/E 68 SS Anant Bhiku Nar 65 62 75 K/W 60 SS Sanjay Kashinath Pawar 20.91 5 7 R/S 25 INC Ajanta Rajpati Yadav 63 29 3 D 215 SS Surendra Ramkrishna Bagalkar 20.75 207 122 R/N 1 SS Abhishek Vinod Ghosalkar 45 15 52 P/S 47 SS Jitendra Hiralal Valvi 20.72 151 32 F/N 170 SS Trushna Chandrakant Vishwasrao 41 49 46 R/S 24 INC Yogesh Janardan Bhoir 20.71 24 92 M/E 129 SP Reshma Ramesh Nevrekar 40 19 65

Bottom 9 Councillors in Questions Asked Bottom 9 Councillors in Quality of Questions Asked

Overall Rank Overall Rank No. of Constituency Political Score Constituency Political question Ward No. Party Councillors (out of 28) 2014 2015 Ward No. Party Councillors asked 2014 2015 P/N 37 SS Manisha Sadashiv Patil 0 209 214 P/N 37 SS Manisha Sadashiv Patil 0 209 214 K/W 53 IND Changez Jamal Multani 0 217 219 K/W 53 IND Changez Jamal Multani 0 217 219 K/E 73 INC Kesarben Murji Patel 0 212 206 K/E 73 INC Kesarben Murji Patel 0 212 206 H/E 82 MNS Sukhada Rahul Pawar 0 138 217 H/E 82 MNS Sukhada Rahul Pawar 0 138 217 INC Mohammed Tanveer Mohammed 0 218 H/W 97 168 INC Mohammed Tanveer Mohammed 0 218 Ali Patel H/W 97 168 Ali Patel S 116 MNS Avinash Bhaskar Sawant 0 225 220 S 116 MNS Avinash Bhaskar Sawant 0 225 220 N 120 NCP Pratiksha Raju Ghuge 0 192 210 N 120 NCP Pratiksha Raju Ghuge 0 192 210 N 128 MNS Mangal Prameshwar Kadam 0 223 211 N 128 MNS Mangal Prameshwar Kadam 0 223 211 M/E 136 SS Manju Bholeshankar Kumare 0 174 203 M/E 136 SS Manju Bholeshankar Kumare 0 174 203

138 MUMBAI REPORT CARD MUNICIPAL COUNCILLORS 2015 139 Top 10 Councillors in Perceived Performance Top 10 Councillors in Awareness & Accessibility

Overall Rank Overall Rank Constituency Political Score Constituency Political Score Ward No. Party Councillors (out of 30) 2014 2015 Ward No. Party Councillors (out of 5) 2014 2015 S 110 NCP Dhananjay Sadashiv Pisal 25.11 74 27 R/S 22 BJP Sunita Ramnagina Yadav 4.51 6 1

R/S 22 BJP Sunita Ramnagina Yadav 24.76 6 1 L 157 SS Manali Mangesh Tulaskar 4.41 42 62

K/E 76 SS Smita Subhash Sawant 24.45 119 47 R/N 6 SS Hansaben Gunvantrai Desai 4.38 136 183

F/S 195 INC Sunil Vishnu More 24.03 170 51 S 106 SS Ramesh Gajanan Korgaonkar 4.35 135 105

K/W 61 INC Mohsin Haji Haider 23.53 87 33 K/E 79 SS Shubhada Shashikant Patkar 4.23 161 67

R/N 6 SS Hansaben Gunvantrai Desai 23.38 136 183 K/W 54 SS Raju Shripad Pednekar 4.18 129 83

K/W 53 IND Changez Jamal Multani 23.13 217 219 K/W 53 IND Changez Jamal Multani 4.14 217 219

F/S 199 SS Hemangi Hemantkumar Chemburkar 23.13 51 8 B 221 INC Dnyanraj Yashvant Nikam 4.13 134 209

S 106 SS Ramesh Gajanan Korgaonkar 22.93 135 105 R/S 27 BJP Mukeshkumar Mistry 4.10 153 142

R/S 27 BJP Mukeshkumar Mistry 22.90 153 142 S 110 NCP Dhananjay Sadashiv Pisal 4.09 74 27

Bottom 10 Councillors in Perceived Performance Bottom 10 Councillors in Awareness & Accessibility

Overall Rank Overall Rank Constituency Political Score Constituency Political Score Ward No. Party Councillors (out of 30) 2014 2015 Ward No. Party Councillors (out of 5) 2014 2015 C 218 SS Sampat Sudam Thakur 14.57 38 106 R/S 21 INC Ramashish Gopal Gupta 0.75 4 12

P/N 44 IND Cyril Piter D'souza 15.29 144 153 D 211 SS Arvind Devji Dudhwadkar 0.80 105 135

G/N 178 INC Vakil Sagir Ahmed Shaikh 16.00 166 149 R/C 11 MNS Shilpa Shirish Chogle 0.80 45 117

G/N 181 MNS Shraddha Rajesh Patil 16.26 63 171 K/W 60 SS Sanjay Kashinath Pawar 0.94 5 7

R/C 11 MNS Shilpa Shirish Chogle 16.40 45 117 R/C 10 NCP Riddhi Bhaskar Khursange 0.98 112 143

K/W 62 BJP Ameet Bhaskar Satam 16.45 61 154 P/N 37 SS Manisha Sadashiv Patil 0.99 209 214

F/N 171 BJP Mahant Ramnaresh Chaube 16.47 205 182 R/C 12 BJP Asawari Anil Patil 1.04 103 98

G/N 175 RPI (A) Sabreddy Mallesh Borra 16.67 208 150 F/N 173 SS Alka Hemant Doke 1.19 178 185

H/E 85 IND Ilyas Bashir Shaikh 16.68 173 202 F/N 169 SS Shradha Shridhar Jadhav 1.21 116 10

D 214 BJP Jyotshna Devesh Mehta 16.70 95 168 S 108 MNS Rupesh Uttam Waingankar 1.27 213 191

140 MUMBAI REPORT CARD MUNICIPAL COUNCILLORS 2015 141 Top 10 Councillors in discretionary Fund Utilised Ranks of Party Head/Committee Chairperson (` In lakhs)

Overall Rank Score Overall Constituency Political (out of 100) Rank Ward No. Party Councillors Funds 2014 2015 Constituency Party Head/Committee R/S 23 SS Prajakta Vikas (Sawant)Vishwasrao 60 7 42 Ward No. Party Councillors Chairperson 2014 2015 2014 2015

L 155 IND Lalita Annamalai 60 219 201 R/N 6 SS Hansaben Gunvantrai Desai R/N and R/C Ward Committee 57.50 47.85 136 183

G/N 178 INC Vakil Sagir Ahmed Shaikh 60 166 149 R/S 19 INC Neha Vinayak Patil R/S Ward Committee 60.84 48.74 111 178

G/N 181 MNS Shraddha Rajesh Patil 60 63 171 P/N 41 BJP Vinod Babaji Shelar P/N Ward Committee 69.89 58.36 35 112

G/N 182 MNS Virendra Vishnu Tandel 60 194 116 P/S 51 SS Pramila Dillip Shinde P/S Ward Committee 59.27 72.44 124 17

G/N 184 MNS Sudhir Krushna Jadhav 60 13 21 K/W 64 IND Bhavna Ameet Mangela K/W Ward Committee 54.06 65.26 156 69

R/S 24 INC Yogesh Janardan Bhoir 60 24 92 K/E 67 SS Manjiri Gurunath Parab K/E Ward Committee 62.84 47.99 96 181

G/N 177 SS Rajendra Narayan Suryavanshi 60 177 205 H/W 92 MNS Geeta Shrikrishna Chavan H/E and H/W Ward Committee 57.60 55.89 131 131

G/N 175 RPI (A) Sabreddy Mallesh Borra 59 208 150 S 116 MNS Avinash Bhaskar Sawant S and T Ward Committee 28.54 25.37 225 220 N 126 MNS Suresh Dnyanu Awale N Ward Committee 61.99 90 P/S 47 SS Jitendra Hiralal Valvi 59 151 32 54.33 155 M/E 138 BRPBM Arun Vishvanath Kamble M/E Ward Committee 51.40 53.22 179 157

M/W 143 BJP Mahadev Shankar Shivgan M/W Ward Committee 60.72 60.90 114 100

L 153 IND Leena Harish Shukla L Ward Committee 62.11 58.28 100 114

G/N 181 MNS Shraddha Rajesh Patil G/N Ward Committee 67.05 50.25 63 171

Bottom 10 Councillors in discretionary Fund Utilised G/S 186 MNS Seema Mahesh Shivalkar G/S Ward Committee 60.33 45.36 118 189 (` In Lakhs) F/S 197 SS Nandkishor Sakharam Vichare F/S and F/N Ward Committee 66.93 61.27 65 97

Overall Rank D 212 BJP Sarita Ajay Patil C and D Ward Committee 67.62 68.71 57 44 Constituency Political B 223 INC Javed Ibrahim Juneja A, B and E Ward Committee 67.64 64.44 56 76 Ward No. Party Councillors Funds 2014 2015 B 222 INC Waqarunnisa Ansari 5 102 126 R/S 22 BJP Sunita Ramnagina Yadav Public Health Committee 75.92 80.87 6 1

F/S 200 SS Vaibhavi Vijay Chavan 6 108 85 P/N 29 SS Ajit Damodar Bhandari Markets and Gardens Committee 69.08 74.08 44 11

D 216 INC Shantilal Chogalal Doshi 7 164 89 K/W 56 SS Yashodhar Padmakar Phanse Standing Committee 75.41 69.48 10 40 H/E 87 BJP Krishna Dhondu Parkar Law, Revenue and General Purposes 69.25 57.32 41 119 M/W 143 BJP Mahadev Shankar Shivgan 8 114 100 Committee

D 214 BJP Jyotshna Devesh Mehta 9 95 168 H/E 88 SS Deepak Ramchandra Bhutkar Works Committee (Suburbs) 72.73 71.08 23 29

F/S 201 SS Shweta Shyamsunder Rane 9 181 204 T 102 BJP Prakash Kashinath Gangadhare Improvements Committee 59.38 53.64 123 151

F/S 199 SS Hemangi Hemantkumar Chemburkar 10 51 8 N 121 BJP Ritu Rajesh Tawade Education Committee 73.86 72.56 16 16

R/C 15 BJP Mohan Ramchandra Mithbaokar 14 148 176 L 160 SS Sanjana Kishor Mungekar Women and Child Welfare Committee 72.80 75.65 22 6

F/N 167 BJP Rajeshree Rajesh Shirwadkar 15 21 84 D 211 SS Arvind Devji Dudhwadkar BEST Committee 61.49 55.56 105 135

K/E 68 SS Anant Bhiku Nar 15 62 75 C 218 SS Sampat Sudam Thakur Works Committee (City) 69.64 59.85 38 106

142 MUMBAI REPORT CARD MUNICIPAL COUNCILLORS 2015 143 Ranks of Party Head/Committee Chairperson keÀe³e&He×leer

Score Overall (out of 100) Rank 1. cetu³eceeHeve ceespeHeÆer Constituency Party Head/Committee Ward No. Party Councillors Chairperson 2014 2015 2014 2015 Òepeeves efJeefJeOe #es$eeleerue le%e J³ekeÌleerbMeer efJe®eejefJeefvece³e keÀªve cetu³eceeHeve He×leer efJekeÀefmele kesÀueer Deens. K/W 57 INC Devendra Shridhar Amberkar INC Party Head 54.96 71.66 152 24 jepekeÀjCe, meceepeefJe%eeve, ceekexÀì jerme®e&, ceeO³eces DeMee efJeefJeOe #es$eeleerue le%e J³ekeÌleeRveer ³ee keÀeceer DeeHeues

T 103 BJP Manoj Kishorbhai Kotak BJP Party Head 63.46 58.57 88 111 ³eesieoeve efoues Deens. DeHesef#ele GÎsMe meeO³e nesC³ee®³ee ¢<ìerves mebMeesOevee®eer DeeKeCeer keÀjleevee Heg{erue ÒeMveeb®ee

S 110 NCP Dhananjay Sadashiv Pisal NCP Party Head 65.73 71.23 74 27 ÒeeOeev³eeves efJe®eej kesÀuee iesuee.

M/E 132 SP Rais Kasam Shaikh SP Party Head 71.94 71.91 27 23 De. keÀesCel³ee efvekeÀ

F/N 170 SS Trushna Chandrakant Vishwasrao SS Party Head 68.39 68.07 49 46 ye. Òel³eskeÀ veiejmesJekeÀe®³ee celeoejmebIee®ee Deboepe ³esCes cenÊJee®es; l³ee¢<ìerves mebMeesOevee®eer DeeKeCeer keÀMeer

G/N 185 MNS Sandeep Sudhakar Deshpande MNS Party Head 58.33 53.41 128 152 keÀjeJeer DeeefCe vesceke̳ee keÀesCel³ee J³ekeÌleerb®³ee cegueeKeleer I³eeJ³eele? ³eeleerue Heefnu³ee ÒeMveemeeþer Demee efJe®eej kesÀuee keÀer; 26 veesJnWyej 1949 ceO³es Yeejleeves DeeHeueer jep³eIeìvee Heeefjle kesÀueer, mJeerkeÀejueer. ³ee mebefJeOeeveele ueeskeÀMeener jep³ekeÀejYeeje®eer efve³eceeJeueer meceeefJe<ì Deens. keWÀê, jep³e DeeefCe mLeeefvekeÀ mJejep³e mebmLee ³ee leervner mlejeJejerue keÀejYeej me#ece Je ueeskeÀeefYecegKe JneJee ³ee¢<ìerves Ieìvesle DeeJeM³ekeÀ les yeoue JesUesJesUer kesÀues iesues Deensle, veJes keÀe³eos mebcele keÀjC³eele Councillors Holding 2 ‘Offices’ Deeues Deensle. IeìveelcekeÀ lejlegoer DeeefCe efJeefJeOe keÀe³eos ³eeÜejs ueeskeÀÒeefleefveOeeRvee l³eeb®³ee keÀecee®es DeefOekeÀej yeneue keÀjC³eele Deesues Deensle; lemes®e DeefOekeÀejeb®ee iewjJeeHej nesT ve³es ³eemeeþer efveye¥Oe Ieeleuesues Deensle. meJe&®e yeeyeleerle ueeskeÀÒeefleefveOeeRves keÀmes Demeues Heeefnpes ³ee®eer efJeefMe<ì ®eewkeÀì mebefJeOeeveeves DeeKetve efoueer Deens. Score Overall l³eecegUs veiejmesJekeÀeb®³ee keÀeceefiejer®es cetu³eceeHeve efvekeÀ

K/W 62 BJP Ameet Satam MLA 67.23 53.34 61 154 ³eeb®ee efJe®eej Peeuee.

S 111 SS Ashok Patil MLA 47.09 60.59 197 102 Hejbleg, Ieìvesvesner peveceleeuee meJeex®®e mLeeve efoues Deens. l³eecegUs ueeskeÀÒeefveOeeRefJe

R/C 9 BJP Manisha Chaudhary MLA 75.64 67.91 8 48 Deens ne efvekeÀ

F/N 168 BJP Selvan R Tamil MLA 69.12 56.74 43 123 ueeskeÀeb®es DeeHeu³ee celeoejmebIeeleerue ueeskeÀÒeefveOeer®³ee (veiejmesJekeÀe®³ee) keÀeceeefJe

P/S 48 SS Sunil Prabhu MLA N.A. as he was Mayor ³eeHeg{erue Yeeieele ³ee DeY³eemee®eer j®ee keÀMeer kesÀueer DeeefCe Dev³e cenÊJeHetCe& leHeMeerue efoues Deensle. HeCe les till Aug 2014 peeCetve IesC³eeDeeOeer ³ee DeY³eemee®es þUkeÀ ceeefnleer ñeesle keÀesCeles nesles DeeefCe l³eeb®ee cetu³eceeHeve keÀmee JeeHej kesÀuee iesuee ns mecepetve IesCes DeeJeM³ekeÀ Deens. Menjeleerue Òel³eskeÀ veiejmesJekeÀe®eer keÀeceefiejer leHeemeC³eemeeþer Heg{erue ceeefnleer DemeCes DeeJeM³ekeÀ Deens ë 1. keÀener efvekeÀ

144 MUMBAI REPORT CARD MUNICIPAL COUNCILLORS 2015 145 2. ueeskeÀÒeefleefveOeer®eer Jew³eefkeÌlekeÀ Heeée&Yetefce; ³eeceO³es Mew#eefCekeÀ Hee$elee, Dee³ekeÀj efJeJejCe He$es, iegvnsieejer lekeÌlee 1ë veiejmesJekeÀeb®³ee keÀeceefiejer®eer ceespeHeÆer Heeée&Yetefce Demeu³eeme l³eeefJe

146 MUMBAI REPORT CARD MUNICIPAL COUNCILLORS 2015 147 lekeÌlee 1ë veiejmesJekeÀeb®³ee keÀeceefiejer®eer ceespeHeÆer meeJe&peefvekeÀ Dee³eg<³eele DemeCeeN³ee J³ekeÌleeR®es ®eeefj$³e mJe®í Demeues Heeefnpes. l³eecegUs DeeHeues ÒeefleefveefOelJe keÀjCeeN³ee J³ekeÌleer iegvnsieejer Heeée&Yetceer®³ee Demelee keÀecee ve³esle ns þjJeC³ee®ee, ceeb[C³ee®ee DeefOekeÀej veeieefjkeÀebvee ¬eÀ. efvekeÀ

148 MUMBAI REPORT CARD MUNICIPAL COUNCILLORS 2015 149 8. ceefnuee yeeue keÀu³eeCe meefceleer ³ee efJeYeeieele meJee&efOekeÀ ÒeMve efJe®eejCeeN³ee ueeskeÀÒeefleefveOeeruee keÀceeue 10 iegCe efceUt MekeÀleele. ûegHe HejmeWìspe 9. efJeefOe meefceleer jBkeÀ ÒeceeCes ns iegCeebkeÀve kesÀues Deens. 10. Je=#e ÒeeefOekeÀjCe meefceleer ìkeÌkesÀJeejerle 10 ns keÀceeue iegCe Deensle DeeefCe 0 ns efkeÀceeve iegCe Deensle. 11. yeepeej Je GÐeeve meefceleer keÀ. ®e®exle menYeeie DeMee ÒekeÀejs, veiejmesJekeÀebceO³es ¿ee oesve ke@Àìsiejer Demetve l³eebvee 15 iegCee®es efJelejCe keÀjleevee JesieJesieȳee he´Mve GheeqmLele keÀjC³eeyejesyej®e veiejmesJekeÀe®ee, Dev³e veiejmesJekeÀebveer GheeqmLele kesÀuesu³ee he´MveeJejerue eEkeÀJee He×leerves efJe®eej kesÀuee iesuee Heeefnpes. ceneheeefuekeÀe Dee³egÊeÀebkeÀ[tve Deeuesu³ee he´mleeJeeJejerue ®e®exleerue menYeeie nemeg×e cenÊJee®ee Deens. ner ®e®ee& meJe&meeOeejCe meYesceO³es veiejmesJekeÀe®³ee veeJeemen veeWoefJeueer peeles. ner ceeefnleer Deecner ceeefnleer®³ee DeefOekeÀejeletve GHeefmLeleer efceUefJeueer Deens DeeefCe l³eeJeªve iegCener efoues Deensle. meJee&efOekeÀ JesUe ®e®exle menYeeieer nesCee-³ee he´efleefveOeeruee veiejmesJekeÀ ceneveiejHeeefuekeÀe Jee@[& meefceleer efJeefJeOe meefcel³eeb®³ee SketÀCe DeefOekeÀeefOekeÀ 5 iegCe osC³eele ³esT MekeÀleele. meJe&meeOeejCe meYee yewþkeÀe (JejerueÒeceeCes) yewþkeÀe 5 ns meJee&le Jej®es iegCe Deensle DeeefCe meJee&le keÀceer 0 iegCe Deensle. ke@Àìsiejer De 9 6 ueeiet veener. 15 [. ÒeMveebletve Gþuesueer mecem³ee, efJe

150 MUMBAI REPORT CARD MUNICIPAL COUNCILLORS 2015 151  Jemeenle DeefOekeÀejer, Fceejle Fl³eeefo, kesÀuee peelees. ueeskeÀ ÒeefleefveefOe Demeu³eeves DeMeer DeeMee kesÀueer peeles keÀer Heefnuee mlej ö ³eeceO³es jml³eeb®eer DeJemLee, jnoejer Je ì^@HeÀerkeÀ pe@ce, meeJe&peefvekeÀ yeieer®eeb®eer GHeueyOelee, veiejmesJekeÀ veeieefjkeÀeb®³ee le¬eÀejeR®³ee efveJeejCeemeeþer ÒeMve efJe®eejleerue efkebÀJee cegÎs ceeb[leerue. cnCetve meoj meeJe&peefvekeÀ JeenlegkeÀer®eer GHeueyOelee, HeeCeer HegjJeþe, HeeCeer efvemmeejCe, mJe®ílee Je Meew®eeue³es ³eeb®ee ceeHeob[ veiejmesJekeÀebveer ceeb[uesu³ee cegÐeebMeer veeieefjkeÀeb®³ee le¬eÀejeR®eer Je keWÀêerke=Àle le¬eÀej veeWoCeer ³eb$eCeeÜejs meceeJesMe Demetve ³eeuee 6 iegCe efoues. DeefYeuesefKele  DeekeÀ[îeeb®eer kesÀuesu³ee letueveebJej DeeOeeefjle Deens. ¿ee ceeHeob[eKeeueer cees[Ceejs ye=nvedcegbyeF&  ogmeje mlej ö ³eeceO³es ªiCeeue³es Je JewÐekeÀer³e megefJeOee Je MeeUe Je ceneefJeÐeeue³es ³eeb®ee meceeJesMe Demetve ceneveiejHeeefuekesÀ®es efJeYeeie Keeueerue ÒeceeCes Deensle. Fceejleer Jemeenle DeefOekeÀejer, ceueefveëmeejCe, ceeueceÊee, ³eeuee 4 iegCe efoues. GÐeeve, HejJeevee, ye=nvedcegbyeF& ceneveiejHeeefuekeÀe efJe

152 MUMBAI REPORT CARD MUNICIPAL COUNCILLORS 2015 153  Je³e DeeefCe efuebie ³eeJej DeeOeeefjle efJeYeeieCeermeeþer Fbef[³eve jer[jMeer[ mì[er®ee DeeOeej Iesleuee. (ne  veiejmesJekeÀeyeeyele ceeefnleer, peeieªkeÀlee Deens Je l³ee®³eeHe³e¥le menpe Heesnes®elee ³esles keÀe. meJee&le ceesþe yesmeueeF&ve meJnx; je<ì^er³e mlejeJej ³ee®es keÀece efce[er³ee jerme®e& ³egPeme& keÀewefvmeueves kesÀues lej  veiejmesJekeÀ Je Ye´<ìe®eej ³eeefJe

cetu³eceeHevee®es IeìkeÀ 1 veiejmesJekeÀe®³ee jepekeÀer³e He#ee®es veebJe peeieªkeÀlee DeeefCe Heesnes®e 77 100 mcejCeele DemeCes veiejmesJekeÀeb®³ee cetu³eceeHeveekeÀefjlee Deecner ÒeecegK³eeves ®eej efJeYeeieeleerue ceeefnleer IesC³ee®es þjJeues, les Heg{erueÒeceeCes ë 2 veiejmesJekeÀe®es veebJe mcejCeele DemeCes peeieªkeÀlee DeeefCe Heesnes®e 77 100  DeeHeu³ee Yeeieeleerue efJeefJeOe megefJeOeebyeeyeleerle ueeskeÀeb®eer celes ë 3 veiejmesJekeÀeMeer menpe Yesìlee ³esles, peeieªkeÀlee DeeefCe Heesnes®e 69 100 l³ee®³eeHe³e¥le Heesnes®elee ³esles  jml³eeb®eer efmLeleer  JeenletkeÀer®eer keÀeW[er 4 veiejmesJekeÀeyeeyele®es meceeOeeve meJe&meeOeejCe GHee³e³eespevee 59 100  meeJe&peveefkeÀ yeieeryes / KesUe®eer cewoeves ³eeb®eer GHeueyOelee 5 peerJeveceeveele megOeejCee meJe&meeOeejCe GHee³e³eespevee 69 100  Dee@ìes, ì@keÌmeer Je yeme ³eemeejK³ee meeJe&peefvekeÀ JeenlegkeÀer®³ee meeOeveeb®eer GHeueyOelee 6 Ye´<ìe®eej Ye´<ìe®eej ceeHeve 72 100  jsMeve ogkeÀeveele Oeev³ee®eer GHeueyOelee 7 JeerpeHegjJeþe ueeskeÀeb®es cele - 3 mlej 67 100

 ªiCeeue³es DeeefCe Flej JewÐekeÀer³e megefJeOee 8 iegvnsieejer Ieìvee ueeskeÀeb®es cele - 3 mlej 57 100  ³eesi³e ÒekeÀej®³ee MeeUe Je ceneefJeÐeeue³es 9 keÀe³eoe Je megJ³eJemLee efmLeleer ueeskeÀeb®es cele - 3 mlej 61 100  Jeerpe HegjJeþe 10 jsMeve ogkeÀeve Oeev³ee®eer GHeueyOelee ueeskeÀeb®es cele - 1 mlej 61 100  HeeCeer HegjJeþe 11 Òeot

154 MUMBAI REPORT CARD MUNICIPAL COUNCILLORS 2015 155 ¬eÀ. IeìkeÀ meJe&meeOeejCe ieì (ûegHeeRie) iegCe keÀceeue iegCe ³eeJesUer Deecner ³ee meJex#eCeele efuebie DeeefCe Je³e ³eemeboYee&ves peer j®evee efometve Deeueer efle®eer leguevee Fbef[³eve jer[jMeerHe meJnxMeer kesÀueer. DeMeer legueveelcekeÀ He[leeUCeer kesÀu³eeves ueeskeÀmebK³es®es ÒeefleefveefveOelJe DeefOekeÀ De®etkeÀ 16 meeJe&peefvekeÀ yeefie®es / cewoeves GHeueyOelee ueeskeÀeb®es cele - 1 mlej 62 100 nesC³eele ceole Peeueer. 17 meeJe&peefvekeÀ JeenlegkeÀer®eer GHeueyOelee ueeskeÀeb®es cele - 1 mlej 59 100 5. vekeÀejelcekeÀ iegCeebkeÀvee®es IeìkeÀ 18 HeeCeer HegjJeþe ueeskeÀeb®es cele - 1 mlej 62 100 veJ³eeves oeKeue Peeuesu³ee SHeÀDee³eDeej meeþer vekeÀejelcekeÀ iegCeebkeÀve 19 HeeJemeeȳeele HeeCeer legbyeC³ee®eer mecem³ee ueeskeÀeb®es cele - 1 mlej 56 100 pej efveJe[tve Deeu³eeveblej ueeskeÀÒeefleefveOeerJej veJ³eeves SHeÀDee³eDeej oeKeue Peeuee Demesue lej leer iebYeerj yeeye 20 mJe®ílee Je Meew®eeue³e megefJeOee ueeskeÀeb®es cele - 1 mlej 59 100 Deens, l³eecegUs ³ee ueeskeÀÒeefleefveOeerves efceUJeuesu³ee iegCeeletve 5 iegCe Jepee kesÀues iesues. ³ee Òeef¬eÀ³esle efkeÀleer veJes SHeÀDee³eDeej oeKeue Peeues ³ee®eer mebK³ee ue#eele Iesleuesueer veener. SkeÀpejer oeKeue IeìkeÀe®es iegCeebkeÀve Peeuee lejer DeeefCe iegv¿ee®es ieebYeer³e& ue#eele IesTve vekeÀejelcekeÀ iegCeebkeÀve kesÀues Deens.

¬eÀ. IeìkeÀ Yeej iegCe keÀceeue iegCe DeejesHeHe$e oeKeue Peeu³eeves vekeÀejelcekeÀ iegCeebkeÀve 1 ceeefnleer, peeieªkeÀlee Je Heesnes®e 5 74 100 iegv¿ee®ee HegjeJee neleer Deeu³eeJej DeejesHeHe$e oeKeue nesles. l³eecegUs ueeskeÀÒeefleefveOeer®³ee ®eeefj$³ee®³ee ¢<ìerves ner 2 meJe&meeOeejCe GHee³e³eespevee 7 64 100 iebYeerj yeeye Deens. l³eecegUs ³ee keÀejCeemeeþer ueeskeÀÒeefleefveOeerves efceUJeuesu³ee iegCeeletve 5 iegCe Jepee kesÀues iesues. 3 Ye´<ìe®eejefJe

ceeefnleer®eer legueveelcekeÀ He[leeUCeer SKeeoe meJnx keÀjleevee, DeeHeu³ee vecegv³eeletve peer DeekeÀ[sJeejer Heg{s ³esles efle®eer leguevee J³eeHekeÀ DeJekeÀeMe Jee ueeskeÀmebK³esleerue meebefK³ekeÀerMeer meebefK³ekeÀerMeer kesÀueer peeles. ner meebefK³ekeÀer JesieJesieȳee JesUsuee kesÀuesu³ee l³ee®e meJex#eCeeletve Iesleueer peeles efkebÀJee Flej ñeesleeletve Iesleueer peeles.

156 MUMBAI REPORT CARD MUNICIPAL COUNCILLORS 2015 157 The following information was required to judge the performance of each THE methodology Municipal Councillor in the city: 1. Some of the tangible parameters like an elected Municipal Councillors attendance in the Corporation and the Committee Meetings, the number 1. Matrix – Scale of Ranking of questions (issues) she/he has raised in the above forums (Corporation and Committee Meetings), importance of those questions, and utilization The Matrix for measuring the functioning of the Municipal Councillors has been of funds allotted to her/him. designed by Praja with inputs from reputed people with sectoral knowledge in governance, social science, market research, media. 2. Some parameters on her/his background such as educational qualification, income tax records & criminal record (if any). In order to design the research and get the desired output, it was important to answer the following two questions: 3. Some soft parameters like the perception/impression of the people in his/ her constituency, awareness about them, satisfaction with their work and a. On what parameters should the performance of Municipal Councillors improvement in the quality of life because of the Municipal Councillor. be evaluated? b. How should the research be designed in order to represent areas of each Once the areas of evaluation were finalised, it was important to decide upon the Municipal Councillors and meet the right people? methodology which would best provide the required information. Information mentioned in points 1 & 2 above was gathered from RTI & by means of For the first question; The Indian Democracy functions on rules and strictures secondary research. Municipal Councillor Scores have been derived out of th laid down in The Constitution of India adopted on the 26 November, 1949. maximum 100 marks with 70% weightage given to tangible facts about the The constitution has been amended on numerous occasions and various acts Municipal Councillor. For the Information on the 3rd point a primary survey was have been passed and adopted by subsequent assemblies to strengthen the conducted amongst the citizens in each constituency to evaluate the perceived functioning of centre, state and local self government institutions. All these acts/ performance of the Municipal Councillor. 30% weightage was given to perceived legislations with their base in the constitution give our elected representative performance of Municipal Councillors in the minds of common man. needed powers for functioning; have built the needed checks and balances; and serve as the source of the terms of reference for the elected representatives The data used for points 1 and 2 has been collected from government sources: on all aspects of their conduct as the people’s representatives. Hence, the first a. Election Department MCGM. parameter for evaluating the performance of Municipal Councillors is based b. Under Right to Information Act from Municipal Secretary, MCGM (MCGM solely in the mechanisms and instruments and duties and responsibilities as led Head Office and BEST). in the Constitution of India, in particular, the 12th Schedule of the Constitution c. Under Right to Information Act from Assistant Engineer (Maintenance), that was introduced through the 73rd and 74th Amendments of the Constitution, MCGM (from all the 24 Administrative Wards of MCGM). and the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888. d. Under Right to Information Act from . However; The Constitution itself derives its power from the free will of its citizens as also the document itself states that it has been adopted, enacted and given People’s perception as per point 3 has been mapped through an opinion poll of 22,850 to themselves by the people. Hence the perceptions of the people who are people across the city of Mumbai by Hansa Market Research conducted through a represented by the elected representatives are the other important, necessary structured questionnaire. parameter for evaluating the performance of the elected representatives (the Municipal Councillors). Thus, to answer the second question it is necessary to It is very important to understand here that the matrix is objectively designed study people’s perceptions of the Municipal Councillors performance, by who and provides no importance to the political party of the representative or to represent them from their respective constituencies. any personal/political ideology. The next few pages will elaborate the study design and details of the study Criminalisation of politics in the country has been growing since independence conducted to judge the performance of Municipal Councillors in Mumbai; but and is a phenomenon which if not checked now can destroy the democratic before we get into details, it is important to understand the sources of data foundations of our nation. Hence personal criminal record related parameters and its broad usage in the ranking matrix. pertaining to the elected representative are taken into consideration such as:

158 MUMBAI REPORT CARD MUNICIPAL COUNCILLORS 2015 159 their FIR cases registered against them as stated in the election affidavit; new Scale of Ranking FIR cases registered against them after being elected in the current term; and Sr. Indicator Max Comments important pending charge sheets. No. % Table 1: Scale for Ranking Performance for Councillor 4 Negative marking for new -5 For any new FIR registered during the year. criminal cases registered Scale of Ranking during the year Sr. Indicator Max Comments 5 Negative marking for -5 For any Charge sheet in a criminal case. No. % Charge sheet 1 Present 6 Negative marking for -5 This can be done on own website, newspaper, Praja A Attendance in the 15 Refer Point 3a on page 162 for details. no annual pro-active Website or any other source which should be announced Corporation and disclosures by the elected publicly. Committee Meetings representatives of Assets Also marks would be cut for wrong disclosures in the B Number of Questions 10 Against Group Percentage Rank. 10 being the top and Liabilities and Criminal above mentioned forums. Asked most percentiles and so on to the lowest for 0. record (*) C Participation during 5 Against Group Percentage Rank. 5 being the top Total 100 discussion most percentiles and so on to the lowest for 0. D Importance of questions 18 Refer Point 3d on page 164 for details. (*) This negative parameter on proactive disclosures has not been applied for the current year. But as one the primary purpose of the Yearbook is to promote transparency amongst elected asked by issues raised in representatives, it is imperative that they proactively provide personal information on their the question personal annual economic status and to emphasise their probity in public life, they should E Issues raised compared to 10 Refer Point 3e on page 165 for details share every year their updated criminal record. Citizen’s Complaints F Total Discretionary Funds 5 Refer Point 3f on page 165 for details 2. Parameters for Past Records as per Affidavit Utilised during April, 2014 to March, 2015 Parameters for Past Records are based on information in election affidavit that Total 63 includes educational, criminal and financial records of Municipal Councillors. 2 Past Total seven Marks out of Maximum 100 marks are allocated for this parameter. A Education Qualification 1 A minimum of 10th Pass - 1; if not - 0 a. Education B Income Tax 1 Possessing PAN Card - 1; if not - 0 If the elected representative has declared in his affidavit, education qualification C Criminal Record 5 If the candidate has zero cases registered against her/ as 10th pass or more then on the scale one mark is allocated, else zero marks him, then 5; else as below: are given. (1) Criminal Cases Registered excluding the following charges: Murder, Rape, Molestation, Riot, Extortion - 3 As a developing 21st century country, basic modern education is an important (2) Rest - 0 criterion for human development. Even at lowest clerical jobs in the government, Total 7 the government insists on a minimum educational level. Going by the same logic 3 Perception Based on a opinion poll of 22,850 people spread and the times, it is prudent that a similar yardstick be applied to our elected across different constituencies in the city of Mumbai representatives. However, we also believe that the educational parameter should A Perceived Performance 11 Score on Public Services be given a minimal weightage in the overall scheme vis‑a‑vis other parameters, B Awareness & Accessibility 5 Score on Awareness amongst people about their that are more crucial for judging performance of the elected representatives. representative, their political party and ease of access to the representative b. Income Tax C Corruption Index 7 Score on perceived personal corruption of the It is widely published and believed in India that annual income levels and representative wealth of those who are elected sees a manifold increase in the few years 7 D Broad Measures Score on overall satisfaction and improvement in when they represent. Marks are allocated for possessing a PAN card (one quality of life mark), as per the affidavit; else if not possessing a PAN card than zero marks Total 30 are allocated.

160 MUMBAI REPORT CARD MUNICIPAL COUNCILLORS 2015 161 c. Criminal Record iii. Works (City) Committee Criminalisation of politics is a sad reality. A significant number of elected iv. Works (Suburb) Committee representatives have a criminal record i.e. 1) they have FIRs registered against v. Improvements Committee them; 2) charge sheets filled; and 3) even convictions given by the courts of law. vi. Education Committee There is no excuse for not having moral probity in public life. It is the right of vii. Public Health Committee the citizens to have people representing them with no criminal records. Hence viii. Women and Child Welfare Committee the scheme of ranking has into account marks for people with clean records: ix. Law and Revenue Committee i. Those with absolutely no criminal FIRs registered are given five marks. x. Tree Authority Committee xi. Market and Garden Committee ii. Those with FIRs registered against, with cases containing the following charges: murder, rape, molestation and extortion are given zero marks. Thus, it is understood that there can be two categories of councillors and they need to be allocated the 15 marks in different ways: iii. Those with other FIRs registered against, other than those mentioned in No. ii above, are given three marks. Attendance We have negative markings as explained in No. 5 below for other parameters Councillor Corporation General Ward Committee Different Committee Total related to crime records like charge sheet. Body Meetings (GBM) Meetings Meetings (mentioned above) Category A 9 6 N.A. 15 Kindly note that allocating scoring for each individual case would have been Category B 7 4 4 15 complex, instead scoring for cases after them being categorised as above seemed more logical and hence number of individual cases are not of that b. Number of Questions important but the category of case needed for the scoring. There cannot be really a set benchmark for the right number of questions or issues that have to be asked by a representative. However given the range 3. Parameters for Present Performance in the Corporation and and complexity of issues that our country is facing, it is necessary for the Committee Meetings representative to raise as many issues as they can, which are necessary for In an indirect, representative democracy like India’s, citizens elect their the citizens. Hence to stimulate the representatives to ask maximum number representatives so that these representatives can represent them in the of questions the scale uses the percentile system for scoring. houses of legislation and deliberate on issues related to the citizens and form needed legislations under the guidelines of and using the mechanisms of the Devices used for asking ‘Questions’ that have been considered in the marking: constitution. Thus it is very clear that the weightages in the performance scale • Agenda Raised have to be more biased to these functions of the elected representatives i.e. • Point of Order of Deliberation. • Short Notice Question • Interpellation: Right to ask question under section 66 (A) of MMC Act a. Attendance • Discussion on urgent public matters under section 66 (B) of MMC Act The mandate given by citizens to the representatives is to attend the business • Asking statement from Municipal Commissioner under section 66 (C) of the respective legislative houses. It is hence prudent that the representatives • Notice of Motions attend 100% or near to 100% sessions of their respective houses. Hence the • Proposal Raised marking is based on percentage of attendance: 100% getting 15 while 0% • Urgent Business getting zero. • Adjournment of meeting and business to be transacted at adjourned meeting • General discussion on budget estimation However, in the MCGM a councillor is always a member of the Corporation • Proposal for adjournment of debate or meeting and Amendments proposed and a particular Ward Committee, and apart from that some of the councillors • Amendment Proposal are members of various committees viz: • Appeal i. Standing Committee The marking for this section is out of a maximum 10 marks that the representative ii. BEST Committee can get for being the person with the maximum number of questions asked.

162 MUMBAI REPORT CARD MUNICIPAL COUNCILLORS 2015 163 The marking here is done against Group Percentage Rank: e. Issues raised compared to Citizen Complaints 10 being the top most percentile and so on to the lowest for 0. MCGM has developed a system for tracking, recording citizen complaints. These complaints are maintained under the Centralised Complaint Registering c. Participation during Discussion System (CCRS). They are registered into a software platform where they Apart from raising a question or an issue, it is important that Councillors are classified into different categories by departments and the nature of the participate in the ensuing discussion either on the question raised by their complaint such as drainage, road, water supply, colony officer, building, etc. fellow councilors or on proposals received by the Municipal Commissioner. As citizens’ representatives, it is expected that Municipal Councillors also ask These discussions are noted in the General Body Meeting along with the questions or raise issues to resolve citizens issues (complaints). Hence the Councilor’s name. We have taken this data through RTI (Right to Information) current parameter is based on comparing issues raised by councillors related to the citizen complaints based on the RTI information procured related to and allocated markings out of a maximum 5 marks that the representative the data maintained by CCRS. The departments of MCGM that are covered can get for being the person with the maximum number of times they have under this criteria are as follows: Buildings, Colony officer, Drainage, Estate, participated in the discussions: Garden, License, MCGM related, Pest control, Pollution, Roads, Shop and 5 being the top most percentile and so on to the lowest for 0. Establishment (S & E), Solid Waste Management (SWM), Storm Water Drainage, Toilet and Water Supply. d. Importance of questions asked by issues raised in the question The duties of the Municipal Corporation are laid down precisely under the A maximum of 10 marks have been allocated for this parameter. Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888. They are further divided into f. utilisation of Discretionary Funds Utilised April 2014 to March 2015 Obligatory duties (Section 61, 62) and Discretionary duties (Section 63). The Municipal Councillors get a total of Rs. 60 lakhs in every financial year. This Obligatory duties include issues related to roads, water supply, sewerage, fund they can spend as per their discretion on certain specified development buildings, disaster management, municipal properties, primary education, work in their constituencies. It is necessary that the funds are utilised in a health, renaming of roads, etc. are covered. The Discretionary duties include planned phased manner to achieve optimal results. Hence, the marks given are issues related to slum development, open spaces, gardens, road transport, based on percentage of the funds utilised out of the maximum Rs. 60 lakhs for energy, electricity, water bodies (dams, irrigation), community halls/temples, etc. the financial years 2014-2015: In the present scale, we have culled out certain services from the Obligatory (1) 100% (or more) to 91% - five marks; (2) 90% to 76% - four marks; (3) 75% duties that are essentially civic in nature and where the MCGM has monopoly to 61% - three marks; (4) 60% to 51% - two marks; and (5) 50% and below for delivery of these services to the citizens of Mumbai. The issues that can - zero marks. be raised on these services are related to subjects such as drainage, roads, 4. Parameters for People’s Perception as per Opinion Poll water supply, solid waste management, etc. Since perceived performance was given a weightage of 30 points, we divided it Apart from these issues, an councillor can raise subjects that are not under further in to four broad areas in order to evaluate the performance in detail. All the direct purview of the corporation but are covered by the state and central these four areas were given differential weightage based to the importance in governments. Such as, crime, foreign affairs, agriculture, animal husbandry, defining the Municipal Councillors performance. The weightages were divided MMRDA (Mumbai Metropolitan Regional Development Authority), etc. in the following scheme: Based on the above classifications the weightages for the quality/importance n Perception of Public Services (impression of the people about the facilities of the questions has been designated as below from the total marks out of in the area) was given a weightage of 11 points, 100 in the overall scale: n Awareness & Accesibility of the Municipal Councillor was given a weightage of 5 points, Issues/Duties Obligatory Discretionary Civic State/Central Total (Obligatory) n Corruption index was given a weightage of 7 points and Marks 8 6 3 1 18 n Broad overall measures were given a weightage of 7 points

164 MUMBAI REPORT CARD MUNICIPAL COUNCILLORS 2015 165 The rationale for giving the above scoring points was to give more importance n The initial total sample for the study covered: 227 municipal wards x 100 to the key issues like facilities in the area & corruption as compared to respondents = 22700 respondents. Municipal Councillor being aware and accessible or overall feel of the people n Next step was to define the target group for the study. We finalised on being positive. This is because we believe that scoring positively overall or covering within each ward: being popular is actually a function of your work in different areas. Hence, these areas should be given more importance than the overall satisfaction. p Both Males & Females Moreover a blanket overall performance for an individual may be good but p 18 years and above (eligible to vote) when interrogated deeply about different traits the positives and negatives can be clearly pointed. n Once the target group was defined, quotas for representing gender and age groups were set. The next step after assigning weightages to government’s four broad areas was to make sure that facilities which come under local jurisdiction to get more n The quotas were set on the basis of age and gender split available through importance than the ones which come under the state or central government’s Indian Readership Study (Large scale baseline study conducted nationally jurisdiction. Hence the weightage for Perception of Public Services was further by Media Research Users Council (MRUC) & Hansa Research group for divided into a hierarchy of 3 levels to meet the desired objective. Mumbai Region.

Level 1 included facilities which are more critical to local government whereas n The required information was collected through face to face interviews Level 3 included facilities that are more critical to state government. with the help of structured questionnaire. n In order to meet the respondent, following sampling process was followed: n Level 1 – This level included areas like Condition of Roads, Traffic Jams & Congestion, Availability of public gardens, Availability of public transport p 100 interviews were conducted in each municipal ward. facilities, Water Supply, Water logging problems & Cleanliness & Sanitation p 2 – 3 prominent areas in the ward were identified and the sample was facilities. It was given a weightage of 6 points. divided amongst them. These areas were mainly crowded areas such n Level 2 – This level included areas like Hospitals & other Medical facilities as market place, railway stations, malls etc. & Appropriate Schools & Colleges. It was given a weightage of 4 points. p Respondents were intercepted in these areas and the required information was obtained from them. n Level 3 – This level included areas like Power Supply, Instances of Crime, Law & Order situation. It was given a weightage of 1 point. n Sample composition of age & gender was corrected to match the universe profile using the baseline data from IRS. (Refer to weighting paragraph on Research Design: next page). n A Municipal Councillor is a representative elected by the voters to over Parameters of Evaluation: see the functioning of the ward. While deciding the parameters of evaluation for a Municipal Councillor, we n Winner of elections in each ward is termed as a Municipal Councillor and decided to capture the information on four important aspects. These were as has the power to manage the functioning of the ward. follows: n This division helps to provide clear delegation of responsibilities at the ground level. n Impression of the people about different facilities in his/her area n Since, our study focused on evaluating the performance of Municipal p Condition of Roads Councillors it was necessary to cover and represent all the wards to which p Traffic jams & Congestion of roads each of these Municipal Councillors belonged. p Availability of public gardens/open playgrounds n Hence, we decided to cover a sample from each ward. We decided to cover all the 227 municipal wards equally, with a sample of 100 in p Availability of public transport facilities like Auto, Taxis & Buses each ward. p Availability of food through ration shops

166 MUMBAI REPORT CARD MUNICIPAL COUNCILLORS 2015 167 p Hospitals and other medical facilities Sr. Parameters Broad groupings Scores Maximum No. Score p Appropriate schools and colleges 11 Pollution problems Impression of people - Level 1 56 100 p Power Supply 12 Hospitals and other medical Impression of people - Level 2 67 100 p Water Supply facilities 13 Appropriate schools and Impression of people - Level 2 68 100 p Water Logging during rainy season colleges p Pollution problems 14 Condition of Roads Impression of people - Level 1 58 100 15 Traffic jams & Congestion of Impression of people - Level 1 57 100 p Instances of Crime roads p Law & Order situation 16 Availability of public gardens/ Impression of people - Level 1 62 100 open playgrounds p Cleanliness & Sanitation facilities 17 Availability of public transport Impression of people - Level 1 59 100 facilities like Auto, Taxis & n Awareness & Accessibility of the Municipal Councillor Buses n Perception of corruption for Municipal Councillor 18 Water Supply Impression of people - Level 1 62 100 n Broad overall measures like overall satisfaction with Municipal Councillor 19 Water Logging during rainy Impression of people - Level 1 56 100 season & improvement in quality of life because of Municipal Councillor. 20 Cleanliness & Sanitation Impression of people - Level 1 59 100 Illustration of Scorecard for an Municipal Councillor: facilities

Below is an illustration of scorecard for a Municipal Councillor which will help Scores of Netted Variables us to understand the scoring pattern: Sr. Netted Variables Weightage Assigned Scores Maximum Parameter Scores No. Score 1 Awareness & Accessibility 5 74 100 Sr. Parameters Broad groupings Scores Maximum 2 Broad overall measures 7 64 100 No. Score 3 Corruption Index 7 72 100 1 Recall for party name to which Awareness & Accessibility 77 100 4 Impression of people - Level 1 6 59 100 the Municipal Councillor 5 Impression of people - Level 2 4 68 100 belongs 6 Impression of people - Level 3 1 62 100 2 Recall for Name of the Awareness & Accessibility 77 100 Municipal Councillor Weighted Final Scores 3 Accessibility of the Municipal Awareness & Accessibility 69 100 Councillor Perceived performance score of the Municipal Councillor = 4 Satisfaction with the Municipal Broad overall measures 59 100 Councillor ((5*74)+(7*64)+(7*72)+(6*59)+(4*68)+(1*62))/100 = 20.1 out of 30 5 Improvement in Lifestyle Broad overall measures 69 100 This score was further added with the performance on hard parameters and a 6 Corruption Corruption Index 72 100 composite score for each Municipal Councillor was derived. 7 Power Supply Impression of people - Level 3 67 100 Weighting the data: 8 Instances of Crime Impression of people - Level 3 57 100 9 Law & Order situation Impression of people - Level 3 61 100 When conducting a survey, it is common to compare the figures obtained in a 10 Availability of food through Impression of people - Level 1 61 100 sample with universe or population values. These values may come from the ration shops same survey from a different time period or from other sources.

168 MUMBAI REPORT CARD MUNICIPAL COUNCILLORS 2015 169 In this case, we compared the age & gender compositions achieved in our survey with the similar compositions in IRS study (Indian Readership Survey). THE FOUR LION TORCH In the process, minor deviations for demographics were corrected.

Hence, weighting not only helped us to remove the demographic skews from our sample data but also ensured that the representation of demography DeMeeskeÀ mlebYeeJejerue ®eej efmebn ns meÊee, Oew³e&, DeefYeceeve DeeefCe DeelceefJeéeeme ³eeb®es ÒeleerkeÀ Deensle. DeeHeu³ee was correct. jep³eIeìvesle DeO³eeËle meeJe&Yeewce Yeejlee®³ee mebkeÀuHee®es les ÒeleerkeÀ Deens. cegbyeF&leerue meJee&efOekeÀ iegCe efceUJeCeeN³ee 5. Parameters for Negative Marking 3 veiejmesJekeÀebvee Deece®ee ÒeCeece DeeefCe les ³ee Yeejleer³e HejbHejs®es Kejs HeeuevekeÀlex Deensle Demes Deecneuee Jeeìles. Keeueerue veceto kesÀuesu³ee Jemlegefve<þ cetu³eebkeÀve Òeef¬eÀ³esletve DeeefCe DeeHeu³ee yejesyejer®³ee veiejmesJekeÀeb®³ee leguevesle Negative marking for new FIR cases registered ÒeYeeJeer keÀeceefiejer keÀªve l³eebveer ns DeJJeue mLeeve efceUJeues Deens. pe³eefnbo. If there has been a new FIR registered against the elected representative after his election then this happens to be a matter of concern; and hence out of the marks earned by the representative, five marks would be deducted.

Do note that in the process of allocating marks does not take into account number of new criminal FIR cases, but simply takes into account even a single occurrence for allocating marks based on the severity of the crime.

Negative marking for Charge Sheet registered

A charge sheet signifies prima facie evidence in the case. This is again a serious concern for moral probity of the representative. Hence out of the marks earned by the representative, five marks would be deducted.

Do note that in the process of allocating marks does not take into account number of criminal charge sheets, but simply takes into account even a single occurrence for allocating marks based on the severity of the crime.

Negative marking for no annual pro-active disclosures by the elected representatives of Assets and Liabilities and Criminal record

As per the election commission norms the candidate standing for elections have to file an affidavit detailing amongst other things, their own asset and liabilities and criminal records. The candidate who gets elected later, does not share this information with his constituency or the election commission until #1: GOLD and unless he/she stands for re-election or for a new election on different #2: SILVER seat or post. However given the need of the time, we feel that it is necessary #3: BRONZE that the elected representatives proactively make their assets and liabilities (income status) and criminal records available to their constituencies at the The four lions of the Ashoka Pillar, symbolising power, courage, pride and end of every financial year when they are representing. This can be done confidence are the ethos behind the Indian Republic as embedded in our through Newspapers or other Public Medias or through their own Websites or Constitution. We salute the top 3 ranking Municipal Councillors of Mumbai as through Praja Website. This will bring larger transparency. torch bearers of this idea. They have topped the list by on an objective ranking system as explained earlier in this report card, performing more efficiently relative to their peers. Jai Hind.

170 MUMBAI REPORT CARD MUNICIPAL COUNCILLORS 2015 171 THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA WE, THE PEOPLE OF INDIA, HAVING SOLEMNLY RESOLVED TO CONSTITUTE INDIA INTO A SOVEREIGN SOCIALIST SECULAR DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC AND TO SECURE TO ALL ITS CITIZENS: JUSTICE, SOCIAL, ECONOMIC AND POLITICAL; LIBERTY OF THOUGHT, EXPRESSION, BELIEF, FAITH AND WORSHIP; EQUALITY OF STATUS AND OF OPPORTUNITY; AND TO PROMOTE AMONG THEM ALL FRATERNITY ASSURING THE DIGNITY OF THE INDIVIDUAL AND THE UNITY AND INTEGRITY OF THE NATION.

Room No. 5, 2nd floor, Botawala Building, 11/13, Horniman Circle, Fort, Mumbai - 400 023. Ph. 6525 2729 • WWW.praja.org 172 MUMBAI REPORT CARD