Colloquium: Majorana Fermions in Nuclear, Particle and Solid-state Physics Steven R. Elliott∗ Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, USA, 87545 Marcel Franzy Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, V6T 1Z1 Ettore Majorana (1906-1938) disappeared while traveling by ship from Palermo to Naples in 1938. His fate has never been fully resolved and several articles have been written that explore the mystery itself. His demise intrigues us still today because of his seminal work, published the previous year, that established symmetric solutions to the Dirac equation that describe a fermionic particle that is its own anti-particle. This work has long had a significant impact in neutrino physics, where this fundamental question regarding the particle remains 1 unanswered. But the formalism he developed has found many uses as there are now a number of candidate spin- 2 neutral particles that may be truly neutral with no quantum number to distinguish them from their anti-particles. If such particles exist, they will influence many areas of nuclear and particle physics. Most notably the process of neutrinoless double beta decay can only exist if neutrinos are massive Majorana particles. Hence, many efforts to search for this process are underway. Majorana’s influence doesn’t stop with particle physics, however, even though that was his original consideration. The equations he derived also arise in solid state physics where they describe electronic states in materials with superconducting order. Of special interest here is the class of solutions of the Majorana equation in one and two spatial dimensions at exactly zero energy. These Majorana zero modes are endowed with some remarkable physical properties that may lead to advances in quantum computing and, in fact, there is evidence that they have been experimentally observed. This review first summarizes the basics of Majorana’s theory and its implications. It then provides an overview of the rich experimental programs trying to find a fermion that is its own anti-particle in nuclear, particle, and solid state physics. Contents 2. Vortices in Fu-Kane Model 21 3. Vortex Exchange and Braiding 22 I. Introduction 1 E. Experimental Observations 24 A. The Particle Physics View 2 B. The Solid State Physics View 2 1. Quantum Wires and Other 1D Systems 24 C. Significance and Potential Applications 4 2. 2D Systems 25 II. The Majorana Equation and its Consequences 4 V. Summary and Conclusions 25 A. The Majorana-Dirac Equations 4 B. Majorana Fermions as Emergent Particles in Solids with Superconducting Order 6 Acknowledgments 26 III. Majorana Fermions in Nuclear and Particle Physics 7 References 26 A. The Seesaw Mechanism 7 B. Lepton Number Conservation 8 C. Leptogenesis 8 D. Double Beta Decay 8 E. Supersymmetry 10 F. Prospects for Observation 10 I. INTRODUCTION 1. Double Beta Decay 11 2. Proton Decay 13 In the late 1920’s Schrodinger¨ published his non-relativistic 3. Accelerator Searches 13 wave equation (Schrodinger,¨ 1926) describing the quantum 4. Searches for a Fourth Neutrino 13 5. Dark Matter Searches 14 behavior of fundamental particles. Soon thereafter Paul Dirac developed the wave equation (Dirac, 1928) that bears his IV. Majorana Zero Modes in Solid State Systems 15 name describing the behavior of relativistic particles. About A. Majorana Zero Modes 15 a decade later, Ettore Majorana recognized the importance B. Kitaev Chain: the 1D Prototype System 16 arXiv:1403.4976v2 [cond-mat.supr-con] 1 Dec 2014 C. Physical Realizations in 1D 18 of a specific representation of the Dirac equation (Majorana, 1. Edge of a 2D Topological Insulator 18 1937). There are numerous examples of elementary particles 2. Nanowire Made from a 3D Topological Insulator 19 that are described by the Dirac equation, but as yet, none have 3. Semiconductor Quantum Wires 19 been found that obey that of Majorana. Discovering particles 4. Helical Spin Chains 20 or quasi-particles that are governed by Majorana’s formalism D. Systems in Two Dimensions 21 1. Non-Abelian Exchange Statistics: General Considerations 21 would have significant implications for science. Depending on the type of particle or quasi-particle found, subfields rang- ing from cosmology to particle physics to solid state physics would be affected. The remarkable achievement of the Ma- ∗Electronic address: [email protected] jorana equation and its potential consequences motivate this yElectronic address: [email protected] colloquium. 2 A. The Particle Physics View and σ0 is the identity matrix. Denoting σµ = (σ0; −σi) and σˆ µ = (σ0; σi), the Dirac matrices can be written, in the Weyl Schrodinger’s¨ equation was developed using the classical representation, as; equation relating energy (E) to momentum (p) for a particle ! of mass m 0 σµ γµ = (8) σˆ µ 0 E = p2=2m; (1) The choice of the matrices in Eq. (8), however, is not unique. and substituting the corresponding differential operators Majorana’s insight was that for a particular choice of the α’s (~=c=1): and β, Eq. (5) is real with a real solution. The corresponding @ Dirac matrices in Majorana representation read E ! i ; p ! −ir (2) @t ! ! 0 −σ1 0 σ0 γ˜ 0 = i ; γ˜ 1 = i ; to find the resulting wave equation, σ1 0 σ0 0 0 ! 2! 2 σ 0 3 0 σ 1 2 γ˜ = i ; γ˜ = : (9) iΨ˙ = − r Ψ (3) −σ0 −σ2 2m 0 0 where Ψ is the wavefunction. Relativistically, the energy- The Dirac equation is actually four coupled equations for momentum relation is 4 spinor components. For the Majorana equation, the condi- tion of reality reduces this to two independent systems, each 2 2 2 E = p + m (4) with two coupled equations. The solution to one of these sys- 1 tems then describes a truly neutral particle, still spin 2 , but and a straight-forward substitution of the operators in Eq. 2 with no distinction between particle and anti-particle. Such a leads to the Klein-Gordon equation which has a double dif- particle, if found, would be termed a Majorana fermion.1 Ed- ferentiation with respect to time. This feature of the Klein- dington (Eddington, 1928) noted that one could derive sym- Gordon equation, which differs from the Schrodinger¨ equa- metrical equations from the Dirac equation, but it was Majo- tion, means that the probability of the value of a dynamic vari- rana who noted the particle/anti-particle correspondence and able cannot be predicted at a future time when Ψ is provided at its importance for neutrinos. a given earlier time. Dirac, wanting to avoid this feature, suc- The four components of a Dirac wave function describe a ceeded in writing an equation that was linear in Ψ˙ , removing particle and anti-particle pair, each with spin 1 . The equiv- this difficulty. Dirac wrote his equation as 2 alent in the Majorana picture are two particles, each of spin 1 . In some sense one can consider a Dirac fermion as a spe- iΨ˙ = H Ψ = (α · p + βm)Ψ: (5) 2 Dirac cial case of a Majorana fermion pair. Two, mass-degenerate 2 The α’s and β of Eq. (5) do not commute and hence they can- Majorana fermions with opposite CP parity would be indis- not be simple numbers, but Dirac was able to find a set of 4×4 tinguishable from a Dirac fermion with that same mass. matrices that met the requirements for his equation. The form of those matrices are such that operating with HDirac twice will result in Eq. 4. The solutions of Eq. (5) are 4-component B. The Solid State Physics View 1 vectors that describe a spin- 2 particle that is distinct from its anti-particle. Such anti-particles, including the electron’s anti- In solid state physics the only fermionic particles that mat- particle partner the positron and neutron’s anti-particle partner ter for all practical purposes are electrons. Electrons are, of the anti-neutron, were found soon after Dirac’s publication, course, Dirac fermions. However, as it turns out, Majorana and his work has been considered a prediction of their exis- fermions can occur in certain solids as emergent quasiparti- tence. cles which can be thought of as collective excitations of the A more modern description expresses the Dirac equation so quantum many-body state describing the interacting electron that it is manifestly Lorentz covariant. One can write Eq. (5) system. as such by multiplying the equation by the matrix β and defin- µ ing the Dirac representation matrices γ = (β; βαi). The equa- tion is then 1 Majorana’s paper was published a year before his disappearance from a µ µ (iγ @µ − m)Ψ = (γ pµ − m)Ψ = 0: (6) transport ship between Palermo and Naples. The story behind his life and theories of his demise are interesting in their own right and are summarized µ Note that p = (i@t; p), pµ = (i@t; −p) and @µ is shorthand for by Holstein (Holstein, 2009) and references therein. @=@xµ. The explicit form of the Dirac matrices can be written 2 CP refers to combined operators of charge conjugation and spatial inver- × i sion symmetry. When the operator CP acts upon a wave function, it in terms of the 2 2 Pauli matrices (σ ), changes the sign of all the position coordinates and changes the particle ! ! ! to anti-particle. For a Majorana fermion it is somewhat more subtle as 0 1 0 −i 1 0 2 σ1 = ; σ2 = ; σ3 = ; (7) C jνi ≡ jνi, and therefore CP jνi = ±i jνi (Carruthers, 1971; Kayser and 1 0 i 0 0 −1 Goldhaber, 1983) 3 Condensed matter physics is replete with examples of emer- cases, however, such a transformation brings no benefit and gence (Anderson, 1972).