DOCSLIB.ORG

Arxiv:1403.4976V2 [Cond-Mat.Supr-Con] 1 Dec 2014 C

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arxiv:1403.4976V2 [Cond-Mat.Supr-Con] 1 Dec 2014 C Colloquium: Majorana Fermions in Nuclear, Particle and Solid-state Physics Steven R. Elliott∗ Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, USA, 87545 Marcel Franzy Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, V6T 1Z1 Ettore Majorana (1906-1938) disappeared while traveling by ship from Palermo to Naples in 1938. His fate has never been fully resolved and several articles have been written that explore the mystery itself. His demise intrigues us still today because of his seminal work, published the previous year, that established symmetric solutions to the Dirac equation that describe a fermionic particle that is its own anti-particle. This work has long had a significant impact in neutrino physics, where this fundamental question regarding the particle remains 1 unanswered. But the formalism he developed has found many uses as there are now a number of candidate spin- 2 neutral particles that may be truly neutral with no quantum number to distinguish them from their anti-particles. If such particles exist, they will influence many areas of nuclear and particle physics. Most notably the process of neutrinoless double beta decay can only exist if neutrinos are massive Majorana particles. Hence, many efforts to search for this process are underway. Majorana’s influence doesn’t stop with particle physics, however, even though that was his original consideration. The equations he derived also arise in solid state physics where they describe electronic states in materials with superconducting order. Of special interest here is the class of solutions of the Majorana equation in one and two spatial dimensions at exactly zero energy. These Majorana zero modes are endowed with some remarkable physical properties that may lead to advances in quantum computing and, in fact, there is evidence that they have been experimentally observed. This review first summarizes the basics of Majorana’s theory and its implications. It then provides an overview of the rich experimental programs trying to find a fermion that is its own anti-particle in nuclear, particle, and solid state physics. Contents 2. Vortices in Fu-Kane Model 21 3. Vortex Exchange and Braiding 22 I. Introduction 1 E. Experimental Observations 24 A. The Particle Physics View 2 B. The Solid State Physics View 2 1. Quantum Wires and Other 1D Systems 24 C. Significance and Potential Applications 4 2. 2D Systems 25 II. The Majorana Equation and its Consequences 4 V. Summary and Conclusions 25 A. The Majorana-Dirac Equations 4 B. Majorana Fermions as Emergent Particles in Solids with Superconducting Order 6 Acknowledgments 26 III. Majorana Fermions in Nuclear and Particle Physics 7 References 26 A. The Seesaw Mechanism 7 B. Lepton Number Conservation 8 C. Leptogenesis 8 D. Double Beta Decay 8 E. Supersymmetry 10 F. Prospects for Observation 10 I. INTRODUCTION 1. Double Beta Decay 11 2. Proton Decay 13 In the late 1920’s Schrodinger¨ published his non-relativistic 3. Accelerator Searches 13 wave equation (Schrodinger,¨ 1926) describing the quantum 4. Searches for a Fourth Neutrino 13 5. Dark Matter Searches 14 behavior of fundamental particles. Soon thereafter Paul Dirac developed the wave equation (Dirac, 1928) that bears his IV. Majorana Zero Modes in Solid State Systems 15 name describing the behavior of relativistic particles. About A. Majorana Zero Modes 15 a decade later, Ettore Majorana recognized the importance B. Kitaev Chain: the 1D Prototype System 16 arXiv:1403.4976v2 [cond-mat.supr-con] 1 Dec 2014 C. Physical Realizations in 1D 18 of a specific representation of the Dirac equation (Majorana, 1. Edge of a 2D Topological Insulator 18 1937). There are numerous examples of elementary particles 2. Nanowire Made from a 3D Topological Insulator 19 that are described by the Dirac equation, but as yet, none have 3. Semiconductor Quantum Wires 19 been found that obey that of Majorana. Discovering particles 4. Helical Spin Chains 20 or quasi-particles that are governed by Majorana’s formalism D. Systems in Two Dimensions 21 1. Non-Abelian Exchange Statistics: General Considerations 21 would have significant implications for science. Depending on the type of particle or quasi-particle found, subfields rang- ing from cosmology to particle physics to solid state physics would be affected. The remarkable achievement of the Ma- ∗Electronic address: [email protected] jorana equation and its potential consequences motivate this yElectronic address: [email protected] colloquium. 2 A. The Particle Physics View and σ0 is the identity matrix. Denoting σµ = (σ0; −σi) and σˆ µ = (σ0; σi), the Dirac matrices can be written, in the Weyl Schrodinger’s¨ equation was developed using the classical representation, as; equation relating energy (E) to momentum (p) for a particle ! of mass m 0 σµ γµ = (8) σˆ µ 0 E = p2=2m; (1) The choice of the matrices in Eq. (8), however, is not unique. and substituting the corresponding differential operators Majorana’s insight was that for a particular choice of the α’s (~=c=1): and β, Eq. (5) is real with a real solution. The corresponding @ Dirac matrices in Majorana representation read E ! i ; p ! −ir (2) @t ! ! 0 −σ1 0 σ0 γ˜ 0 = i ; γ˜ 1 = i ; to find the resulting wave equation, σ1 0 σ0 0 0 ! 2! 2 σ 0 3 0 σ 1 2 γ˜ = i ; γ˜ = : (9) iΨ˙ = − r Ψ (3) −σ0 −σ2 2m 0 0 where Ψ is the wavefunction. Relativistically, the energy- The Dirac equation is actually four coupled equations for momentum relation is 4 spinor components. For the Majorana equation, the condi- tion of reality reduces this to two independent systems, each 2 2 2 E = p + m (4) with two coupled equations. The solution to one of these sys- 1 tems then describes a truly neutral particle, still spin 2 , but and a straight-forward substitution of the operators in Eq. 2 with no distinction between particle and anti-particle. Such a leads to the Klein-Gordon equation which has a double dif- particle, if found, would be termed a Majorana fermion.1 Ed- ferentiation with respect to time. This feature of the Klein- dington (Eddington, 1928) noted that one could derive sym- Gordon equation, which differs from the Schrodinger¨ equa- metrical equations from the Dirac equation, but it was Majo- tion, means that the probability of the value of a dynamic vari- rana who noted the particle/anti-particle correspondence and able cannot be predicted at a future time when Ψ is provided at its importance for neutrinos. a given earlier time. Dirac, wanting to avoid this feature, suc- The four components of a Dirac wave function describe a ceeded in writing an equation that was linear in Ψ˙ , removing particle and anti-particle pair, each with spin 1 . The equiv- this difficulty. Dirac wrote his equation as 2 alent in the Majorana picture are two particles, each of spin 1 . In some sense one can consider a Dirac fermion as a spe- iΨ˙ = H Ψ = (α · p + βm)Ψ: (5) 2 Dirac cial case of a Majorana fermion pair. Two, mass-degenerate 2 The α’s and β of Eq. (5) do not commute and hence they can- Majorana fermions with opposite CP parity would be indis- not be simple numbers, but Dirac was able to find a set of 4×4 tinguishable from a Dirac fermion with that same mass. matrices that met the requirements for his equation. The form of those matrices are such that operating with HDirac twice will result in Eq. 4. The solutions of Eq. (5) are 4-component B. The Solid State Physics View 1 vectors that describe a spin- 2 particle that is distinct from its anti-particle. Such anti-particles, including the electron’s anti- In solid state physics the only fermionic particles that mat- particle partner the positron and neutron’s anti-particle partner ter for all practical purposes are electrons. Electrons are, of the anti-neutron, were found soon after Dirac’s publication, course, Dirac fermions. However, as it turns out, Majorana and his work has been considered a prediction of their exis- fermions can occur in certain solids as emergent quasiparti- tence. cles which can be thought of as collective excitations of the A more modern description expresses the Dirac equation so quantum many-body state describing the interacting electron that it is manifestly Lorentz covariant. One can write Eq. (5) system. as such by multiplying the equation by the matrix β and defin- µ ing the Dirac representation matrices γ = (β; βαi). The equa- tion is then 1 Majorana’s paper was published a year before his disappearance from a µ µ (iγ @µ − m)Ψ = (γ pµ − m)Ψ = 0: (6) transport ship between Palermo and Naples. The story behind his life and theories of his demise are interesting in their own right and are summarized µ Note that p = (i@t; p), pµ = (i@t; −p) and @µ is shorthand for by Holstein (Holstein, 2009) and references therein. @=@xµ. The explicit form of the Dirac matrices can be written 2 CP refers to combined operators of charge conjugation and spatial inver- × i sion symmetry. When the operator CP acts upon a wave function, it in terms of the 2 2 Pauli matrices (σ ), changes the sign of all the position coordinates and changes the particle ! ! ! to anti-particle. For a Majorana fermion it is somewhat more subtle as 0 1 0 −i 1 0 2 σ1 = ; σ2 = ; σ3 = ; (7) C jνi ≡ jνi, and therefore CP jνi = ±i jνi (Carruthers, 1971; Kayser and 1 0 i 0 0 −1 Goldhaber, 1983) 3 Condensed matter physics is replete with examples of emer- cases, however, such a transformation brings no benefit and gence (Anderson, 1972).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Capture and Decay of Electroweak Wimponium
    Prepared for submission to JCAP MIT-CTP/4845 Capture and Decay of Electroweak WIMPonium Pouya Asadi,a Matthew Baumgart,a Patrick J. Fitzpatrick,b Emmett Krupczakb and Tracy R. Slatyerb aNew High Energy Theory Center, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08854 bCenter for Theoretical Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA E-mail: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], fi[email protected], [email protected] Abstract. The spectrum of Weakly-Interacting-Massive-Particle (WIMP) dark matter gener- ically possesses bound states when the WIMP mass becomes sufficiently large relative to the mass of the electroweak gauge bosons. The presence of these bound states enhances the anni- hilation rate via resonances in the Sommerfeld enhancement, but they can also be produced directly with the emission of a low-energy photon. In this work we compute the rate for SU(2) triplet dark matter (the wino) to bind into WIMPonium – which is possible via single-photon emission for wino masses above 5 TeV for relative velocity v < O(10−2) – and study the subsequent decays of these bound states. We present results with applications beyond the wino case, e.g. for dark matter inhabiting a nonabelian dark sector; these include analytic capture and transition rates for general dark sectors in the limit of vanishing force carrier mass, efficient numerical routines for calculating positive and negative-energy eigenstates of a Hamiltonian containing interactions with both massive and massless force carriers, and a study of the scaling of bound state formation in the short-range Hulthén potential. In the arXiv:1610.07617v2 [hep-ph] 24 Jan 2017 specific case of the wino, we find that the rate for bound state formation is suppressed relative to direct annihilation, and so provides only a small correction to the overall annihilation rate.
    [Show full text]
  • Detection of a Strange Particle
    10 extraordinary papers Within days, Watson and Crick had built a identify the full set of codons was completed in forensics, and research into more-futuristic new model of DNA from metal parts. Wilkins by 1966, with Har Gobind Khorana contributing applications, such as DNA-based computing, immediately accepted that it was correct. It the sequences of bases in several codons from is well advanced. was agreed between the two groups that they his experiments with synthetic polynucleotides Paradoxically, Watson and Crick’s iconic would publish three papers simultaneously in (see go.nature.com/2hebk3k). structure has also made it possible to recog- Nature, with the King’s researchers comment- With Fred Sanger and colleagues’ publica- nize the shortcomings of the central dogma, ing on the fit of Watson and Crick’s structure tion16 of an efficient method for sequencing with the discovery of small RNAs that can reg- to the experimental data, and Franklin and DNA in 1977, the way was open for the com- ulate gene expression, and of environmental Gosling publishing Photograph 51 for the plete reading of the genetic information in factors that induce heritable epigenetic first time7,8. any species. The task was completed for the change. No doubt, the concept of the double The Cambridge pair acknowledged in their human genome by 2003, another milestone helix will continue to underpin discoveries in paper that they knew of “the general nature in the history of DNA. biology for decades to come. of the unpublished experimental results and Watson devoted most of the rest of his ideas” of the King’s workers, but it wasn’t until career to education and scientific administra- Georgina Ferry is a science writer based in The Double Helix, Watson’s explosive account tion as head of the Cold Spring Harbor Labo- Oxford, UK.
    [Show full text]
  • A Measurement of Neutral B Meson Mixing Using Dilepton Events with the BABAR Detector
    A measurement of neutral B meson mixing using dilepton events with the BABAR detector Naveen Jeevaka Wickramasinghe Gunawardane Imperial College, London A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of the University of London and the Diploma of Imperial College December, 2000 A measurement of neutral B meson mixing using dilepton events with the BABAR detector Naveen Gunawardane Blackett Laboratory Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine Prince Consort Road London SW7 2BW December, 2000 ABSTRACT This thesis reports on a measurement of the neutral B meson mixing parameter, ∆md, at the BABAR experiment and the work carried out on the electromagnetic calorimeter (EMC) data acquisition (DAQ) system and simulation software. The BABAR experiment, built at the Stanford Linear Accelerator Centre, uses the PEP-II asymmetric storage ring to make precise measurements in the B meson system. Due to the high beam crossing rates at PEP-II, the DAQ system employed by BABAR plays a very crucial role in the physics potential of the experiment. The inclusion of machine backgrounds noise is an important consideration within the simulation environment. The BABAR event mixing software written for this purpose have the functionality to mix both simulated and real detector backgrounds. Due to the high energy resolution expected from the EMC, a matched digital filter is used. The performance of the filter algorithms could be improved upon by means of a polynomial fit. Application of the fit resulted in a 4-40% improvement in the energy resolution and a 90% improvement in the timing resolution. A dilepton approach was used in the measurement of ∆md where the flavour of the B was tagged using the charge of the lepton.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1210.3065V1
    Neutrino. History of a unique particle S. M. Bilenky Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, R-141980, Russia TRIUMF 4004 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver BC, V6T 2A3 Canada Abstract Neutrinos are the only fundamental fermions which have no elec- tric charges. Because of that neutrinos have no direct electromagnetic interaction and at relatively small energies they can take part only 0 in weak processes with virtual W ± and Z bosons (like β-decay of nuclei, inverse β processν ¯ + p e+n, etc.). Neutrino masses are e → many orders of magnitude smaller than masses of charged leptons and quarks. These two circumstances make neutrinos unique, special par- ticles. The history of the neutrino is very interesting, exciting and instructive. We try here to follow the main stages of the neutrino his- tory starting from the Pauli proposal and finishing with the discovery and study of neutrino oscillations. 1 The idea of neutrino. Pauli Introduction The history of the neutrino started with the famous Pauli letter. The exper- imental data ”forced” Pauli to assume the existence of a new particle which later was called neutrino. The hypothesis of the neutrino allowed Fermi to build the first theory of the β-decay which he considered as a process of a quantum transition of a neutron into a proton with the creation of an electron-(anti)neutrino pair. During many years this was the only experi- arXiv:1210.3065v1 [hep-ph] 10 Oct 2012 mentally studied process in which the neutrino takes part. The main efforts were devoted at that time to the search for a Hamiltonian of the interaction which governs the decay.
    [Show full text]
  • Lepton Mixing and Neutrino Mass
    Lepton Mixing and Neutrino Mass v Werner Rodejohann T -1 (MPIK, Heidelberg) mv = m L - m D M R m D Strasbourg MANITOP Massive Neutrinos: Investigating their July 2014 Theoretical Origin and Phenomenology 1 Neutrinos! 2 Literature ArXiv: • – Bilenky, Giunti, Grimus: Phenomenology of Neutrino Oscillations, hep-ph/9812360 – Akhmedov: Neutrino Physics, hep-ph/0001264 – Grimus: Neutrino Physics – Theory, hep-ph/0307149 Textbooks: • – Fukugita, Yanagida: Physics of Neutrinos and Applications to Astrophysics – Kayser: The Physics of Massive Neutrinos – Giunti, Kim: Fundamentals of Neutrino Physics and Astrophysics – Schmitz: Neutrinophysik 3 Contents I Basics I1) Introduction I2) History of the neutrino I3) Fermion mixing, neutrinos and the Standard Model 4 Contents II Neutrino Oscillations II1) The PMNS matrix II2) Neutrino oscillations II3) Results and their interpretation – what have we learned? II4) Prospects – what do we want to know? 5 Contents III Neutrino Mass III1) Dirac vs. Majorana mass III2) Realization of Majorana masses beyond the Standard Model: 3 types of see-saw III3) Limits on neutrino mass(es) III4) Neutrinoless double beta decay 6 Contents I Basics I1) Introduction I2) History of the neutrino I3) Fermion mixing, neutrinos and the Standard Model 7 I1) Introduction Standard Model of Elementary Particle Physics: SU(3) SU(2) U(1) C × L × Y oR +R Species # eR bR tR sR Quarks 10P 10 cR io dR i+ uR ie oL Leptons 3 13 +L eL tL Charge 3 16 cL uL bL sL dL Higgs 2 18 18 free parameters... + Gravitation + Dark Energy + Dark Matter + Baryon
    [Show full text]
  • Cosmologie Et Rayons Cosmiques La
    Ont participé à l’élaboration de ce rapport : Coordination : G. Chrétien-Duhamel Rédaction : M. Baylac A. Billebaud C. Cholat J. Collot V. Comparat L. Derome T. Lamy A. Lucotte N. Ollivier J.-S. Real W. Regairaz J.-M. Richard B. Silvestre-Brac A. Stutz C. Tur Édition (brochure, PDF, CD-ROM) : C. Favro Rapport d’activité 2004 - 2005 Rapport d’activité 2004 - 2005 Avant propos rise de la recherche ou recherche de la crise ? Eu égard aux deux années de réforme Cet de contre-réforme que nous venons de vivre, on peut légitimement se poser cette question. Et tenter d’y répondre – pour ce qui nous concerne – en prenant pour objet d’analyse l’unité de recherche dont l’activité est rapportée dans ce document. En choisissant comme référentiel d’évaluation, les indicateurs scientifiques communs tels que le nombre de publications de rang A (160 pour 2004 - 2005), leur indice moyen de citation à deux ans (10,8 par article), le nombre de distinctions décernées à des membres du laboratoire (7 en 4 ans), la proportion de chercheurs et d’enseignants-chercheurs d’origine étrangère (17%) ou encore le nombre de personnes occupant des responsabilités à un niveau national ou international (15), la crise ne paraît pas très évidente ! Elle n’apparaît nettement que si l’on examine le budget total du laboratoire, salaires soustraits. Celui-ci n’a pas cessé de décroître depuis 2003 (25% de baisse cumulée depuis 2003). Voilà donc où se situe la crise de notre unité – provoquée par les instances de direction des organismes de recherche – au nom d’une politique scientifique qui réduit la place accordée à la recherche fondamentale en physique subatomique sur des bases édictées par le sacro-saint principe d’utilité publique et de demande sociale.
    [Show full text]
  • Connections Between the High and Low Energy Violation of Lepton and Flavor Numbers in the Minimal Left-Right Symmetric Model
    SISSA Scuola Internazionale Superiore di Studi Avanzati Connections Between the High and Low Energy Violation of Lepton and Flavor Numbers in the Minimal Left-Right Symmetric Model Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor Philosophiae Supervisor: Candidate: Prof. Goran Senjanovic Vladimir Tello September 2012 Contents Introduction 2 1 The Left-Right Model 5 1.1 TheLeft-Rightsymmetry. ............................ 6 1.1.1 Symmetry breaking. 7 1.1.2 Gauge interactions of fermions . 9 1.1.3 Yukawa interactions of leptons . 10 1.1.4 Yukawa interactions of Quarks . 11 1.1.5 The Left-Right symmetry and the mass matrices . 11 1.2 Seesawmechanism ................................ 13 1.2.1 Light-Heavy Neutrino mixing - Inverting the seesaw formula . 14 1.2.2 Examples of MD ............................. 15 1.2.3 General Parametrization of MD. .................... 16 1.3 Summary ..................................... 17 2 Phenomenology 21 2.1 Measuring the scale of parity restoration . 21 2.2 Testing the Higgs mechanism. 22 2.3 Experimental limits on particle masses . 23 2.4 Lepton flavour violation . 23 2.4.1 LFV decay modes of Leptons . 25 2.4.2 Muon-electron conversion . 30 2.5 Interplay between di↵erentLFVprocesses . 31 2.6 Neutrinoless double beta decay . 33 2.6.1 Decay Rate . 35 2.6.2 Implication for the LR scale . 39 2.6.3 Cosmological constraints on mN .................... 41 2.7 Interplay between the LHC and Neutrinoless double beta decay. 42 2.8 Illustrative example: Type II seesaw dominance . 43 i 2.9 Electron electric dipole moment . 46 2.9.1 Neutrino dipole moments . 48 Conclusion 50 A Scalar Potential 52 B The square root of a matrix 54 Bibliography 55 ii List of Figures 2.1 The production of WR at the LHC.
    [Show full text]
  • Halliday & Resnick 9Th Edition Solution Manual
    Chapter 44 1. By charge conservation, it is clear that reversing the sign of the pion means we must reverse the sign of the muon. In effect, we are replacing the charged particles by their antiparticles. Less obvious is the fact that we should now put a “bar” over the neutrino (something we should also have done for some of the reactions and decays discussed in Chapters 42 and 43, except that we had not yet learned about antiparticles). To understand the “bar” we refer the reader to the discussion in Section 44-4. The decay of the negative pion is π− →+μ − v. A subscript can be added to the antineutrino to clarify what “type” it is, as discussed in Section 44-4. 2. Since the density of water is ρ = 1000 kg/m3 = 1 kg/L, then the total mass of the pool is ρ = 4.32 × 105 kg, where is the given volume. Now, the fraction of that mass made up by the protons is 10/18 (by counting the protons versus total nucleons in a water molecule). Consequently, if we ignore the effects of neutron decay (neutrons can beta decay into protons) in the interest of making an order-of-magnitude calculation, then the 32 number of particles susceptible to decay via this T1/2 = 10 y half-life is × 5 (10 / 18)M pool (10 / 18)( 4.32 10 kg ) 32 N ==−27 =1.44× 10 . mp 1.67× 10 kg Using Eq. 42-20, we obtain 32 N ln2 ch144.l× 10n 2 R == 32 ≈ 1decay y.
    [Show full text]
  • PPEU-2014-Neutrino-Lecture3.Pdf
    NEUTRINOS Alexey Boyarsky PPEU 1 Discovery of neutrino Observed 14C 14N + e− 6 ! 7 Two body decay: the electron has the same energy (almost) )not observed! Energy is not conserved? Pauli’s letter, Dec. 4, 1930 ... because of the ”wrong” statistics of the N and Li6 nuclei and the continuous beta spectrum, I have hit upon a desperate remedy to save the ”exchange theorem” of statistics and the law of conservation of energy. Namely, the possibility that there could exist in the nuclei electrically neutral particles h::: i which have spin 1/2 and obey the exclusion principle h::: i. The continuous beta spectrum would then become understandable by the assumption that in beta decay a neutron is emitted in addition to the electron such that the sum of the energies of the neutron and the electron is constant. Alexey Boyarsky PPEU 2 Neutrino "I have done a terrible thing. I invented a particle that cannot be detected." W. Pauli Pauli (1930) called this new particle neutron Chadwick discovered a massive nuclear particle in 1932 )neutron Fermi renamed it into neutrino (italian “little neutral one”) Alexey Boyarsky PPEU 3 Neutrino β-decay is the decay of neutron − n p + e +ν ¯e ! inside the nucleus Electron capture: 22 − 22 Na + e Ne + νe 11 ! 10 Here νe has opposite spin than that of ν¯e! The process − p + e n + νe ! inside a nucleus Alexey Boyarsky PPEU 4 β+-decay + Also observed was β -decay 22 22 + Na Ne + e + νe 11 ! 10 Again the particle νe has the opposite spin to ν¯e! + Formally β decay would come from the ? + p n + e + νe ! but mass of proton mp < mn (mass of neutron)?!.
    [Show full text]
  • Majorana Returns Frank Wilczek in His Short Career, Ettore Majorana Made Several Profound Contributions
    perspective Majorana returns Frank Wilczek In his short career, Ettore Majorana made several profound contributions. One of them, his concept of ‘Majorana fermions’ — particles that are their own antiparticle — is finding ever wider relevance in modern physics. nrico Fermi had to cajole his friend Indeed, when, in 1928, Paul Dirac number of electrons minus the number of Ettore Majorana into publishing discovered1 the theoretical framework antielectrons, plus the number of electron Ehis big idea: a modification of the for describing spin-½ particles, it seemed neutrinos minus the number of antielectron Dirac equation that would have profound that complex numbers were unavoidable neutrinos is a constant (call it Le). These ramifications for particle physics. Shortly (Box 2). Dirac’s original equation contained laws lead to many successful selection afterwards, in 1938, Majorana mysteriously both real and imaginary numbers, and rules. For example, the particles (muon disappeared, and for 70 years his modified therefore it can only pertain to complex neutrinos, νμ) emitted in positive pion (π) + + equation remained a rather obscure fields. For Dirac, who was concerned decay, π → μ + νμ, will induce neutron- − footnote in theoretical physics (Box 1). with describing electrons, this feature to-proton conversion νμ + n → μ + p, Now suddenly, it seems, Majorana’s posed no problem, and even came to but not proton-to-neutron conversion + concept is ubiquitous, and his equation seem an advantage because it ‘explained’ νμ + p → μ + n; the particles (muon is central to recent work not only in why positrons, the antiparticles of antineutrinos, ν¯ μ) emitted in the negative − − neutrino physics, supersymmetry and dark electrons, exist.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 15 Classification of Particles
    Chapter 15 Classification of Particles Particle Strong Weak Electromagnetic Spin type interaction interaction interaction 1 Leptons No Yes Some 2 Mesons Yes Yes Yes integer Hadrons Baryons Yes Yes Yes half-integer Interaction carriers Interaction Gauge-boson strong gluon weak W ±, Z electromagnetic photon ( γ) 15.1 Leptons The electron and the neutrino are leptons. They partake in the weak interactions and the electron, being electrically charged, also has electromagnetic interactions. They do not interact strongly and are not found inside the nucleus. In terms of coupling to gauge bosons, this means that they both couple to W ±- and Z-bosons and the electron couples to the photon. There is no coupling between leptons and gluons. Nature gives us three copies of each “family” or “generation” of particles. There are, 1 therefore, two particles with similar properties to the electron (electric charge e, spin- 2 , weakly interacting but not strongly interacting). These are called the muon ( µ) and− the tau (τ). Each of these has its own neutrino, νµ and ντ respectively. Thus the six leptons are 105 Leptons Electric Charge νe νµ ντ 0 e µ τ -1 The electron has a mass of 0.511 Mev /c2, the muon a mass of 106 Mev /c2 and the tau a mass of 1.8 Gev /c2. The heavier charged leptons can decay via the weak interactions into an electron a neutrino and an anti-neutrino. The charged lepton emits a W − and converts into its own neutrino. The W − then decays into an electron and an electron-type anti-neutrino - just as in the β-decay of a neutron.
    [Show full text]
  • Are Neutrinos Their Own Antiparticles?*
    Are Neutrinos Their Own Antiparticles?* Boris Kayser Fermilab, MS 106, P.O. Box 500, Batavia, IL 60510, U.S.A. Email: [email protected] Abstract: We explain the relationship between Majorana neutrinos, which are their own antiparticles, and Majorana neutrino masses. We point out that Majorana masses would make the neutrinos very distinctive particles, and explain why many theorists strongly suspect that neutrinos do have Majorana masses. The promising approach to confirming this suspicion is to seek neutrinoless double beta decay. We introduce a toy model that illustrates why this decay requires nonzero neutrino masses, even when there are both right-handed and left-handed weak currents. For given helicity h, is each neutrino mass eigenstate "i identical to its antiparticle, or different from it? Equivalently, do neutrinos have Majorana masses? If they do, then, as we shall explain, each "i is identical to its antiparticle: "i (h) = "i (h). Neutrinos of this nature are referred to as Majorana neutrinos, while ones for which "i (h) # "i!(h ) are called Dirac neutrinos. ! Let us recall what a Majorana mass is. Out of, say, a left-handed neutrino field, "L, and its charge c ! conjugate, " , one can build the “left-handed” (so called because it is constructed from " ) L ! L Majorana mass term c ! LL = mL"L"L , (1) ! ! which absorbs a (" )R and creates a "L. As this illustrates, Majorana neutrino masses mix neutrinos and antineutrinos, so they do not conserve the lepton number L that is defined by # !+ L(") = L l = #L(" ) = #L l , where l is a charged lepton.
    [Show full text]