DOCSLIB.ORG

Political Thought: Bentham to Weber Lectures Hilary Term 2011, Mondays 10.00 A.M

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Political Thought: Bentham to Weber Lectures Hilary Term 2011, Mondays 10.00 A.M Political Thought: Bentham to Weber Lectures Hilary Term 2011, Mondays 10.00 a.m. Manor Road Building Elizabeth Frazer, New College https://weblearn.ox.ac.uk/portal/hierarchy/socsci/politics/teaching/tutors/e_frazer 1. Themes in nineteenth century political thought 2. Jeremy Bentham 1748-1832: rational government and progress 3. Henri Saint-Simon 1760 to 1825 and Saint-Simonianism: social science and socialism 4. Alexis de Tocqueville 1805-1859: freedom, state and mass society 5. John Stuart Mill 1806-1873: freedom and feminism 6. Emil Durkheim 1858-1917: social science and social order 7. Max Weber 1864-1920: liberalism, socialism and state violence 8. State, society and family in the context of social change. Texts and other works consulted: Bentham, Jeremy. 1982 fp 1789. Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Bentham, Jeremy. 1988 fp 1776. A Fragment on Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Bentham, Jeremy. 1993 fp 1817. Chresthomathia. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Ogden, C. K. 1932. Bentham's Theory of Fictions. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner and Co. Ltd. Burrow, John. 2007. A History of Histories: Epics, Chronicles, Romances and Inquiries from Herodotus and Thucydides to the Twentieth Century. Harmondsworth: Allen Lane. Claeys, Gregory. 1986. "'Individualism', 'Socialism', and 'Social Science': Further notes on a process of conceptual formation 1800-1850." Journal of the History of Ideas 47:81-93. Claeys, Gregory. 1987. "Justice, Independence and Industrial Democracy: The Development of John Stuart Mill's Views on Socialism." The Journal of Politics 49:122-147. Comte, Auguste. 1998 fp 1975. Auguste Comte and Positivism: The Essential Writings. New Brunswick and London: Transaction Publishers. Constant, Benjamin. 1819. "The Liberty of the Ancients Compared with that of the Moderns." in Some Texts from Early Modern Philosophy: http://www.earlymoderntexts.com/f_how.html, edited by J. Bennett. Durkheim, Emile. 1933 fp 1893. The Division of Labour in Society. Translated by G. Simpson. London: Macmillan. Durkheim, Emile. 1952 fp 1897. Suicide. Translated by J. A. Spaulding and G. Simpson. London: Routledge. Durkheim, Emile. 1982 fp 1895. The Rules of Sociological Method. Translated by W.D.Halls. Basingstoke: The Macmillan Press Ltd. Durkheim, Emile. 2001 fp 1912. The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Engels, Friedrich. 1972 fp 1884. The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State. Translated by E. Reed. New York: Pathfinder Press. Finer, S. E. 1972. "The transmission of Benthamite ideas 1820-50." in Studies in the growth of nineteenth century government, edited by G. Sutherland. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. Foucault, Michel. 1977 fp French 1975. Discipline and Punish. New York: Vintage Books. Foucault, Michel. 1970 fp French 1966. The Order of Things: an Archaeology of the Human Sciences. London: Tavistock Publications Limited. Gunn, J.A.W. 1968. "Jeremy Bentham and the Public Interest." Canadian Journal of Political Science 1:398-413. Hainds, J.R. 1946. "John Stuart Mill and the Saint Simonians." Journal of the History of Ideas 7:103-112. Hart, H.L.A. 1973. "Bentham and the Demystification of the Law." The Modern Law Review 36:2-17. Hart, H.L.A. 1982. "Bentham's Principle of Utility and Theory of Penal Law." Pp. lxxix-cxxi in Jeremy Bentham: An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation, The Collected Works of Jeremy Bentham, edited by J. H. Burns and H. L. A. Hart. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Hegel, G.W.F. 1952 fp 1821. Philosophy of Right. Translated by T. M. Knox. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Horowitz, Irving Louis. 1982. "Socialisation without Politicisation: Emile Durkheim's Theory of the Modern State." Political Theory 10:353-377. Jones, Robert Alun and Robert M. Anservitz. 1975. "Saint-Simon and Saint-Simonism: A Weberian View." The American Journal of Sociology 80:1095-1123. Lehmann, Jennifer. 1990. "Durkheim's Response to Feminism: Prescriptions for Women." Sociological Theory 8:163-187. Leopold, David. 2007. The Young Karl Marx: German Philosophy, Modern Politics and Human Flourishing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Macaulay, Thomas Babington. 1829. "Mill on Government." Pp. 271-303 in James Mill: Political Writings, edited by T. Ball. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Marx, Karl. 1954 fp 1867. Capital Volume 1. London: Lawrence and Wishart Mill, James. 1819 'On Government' in (1992). Political Writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Mill, John Stuart and Harriet Taylor Mill. 1983 fp 1851, 1869. The Subjection of Women and The Enfranchisement of Women. London: Virago. Mill, John Stuart 'Civilisation' (1836), 'Bentham' (1838), 'Coleridge' (1840), M.de Tocquevill on Democracy in America (1840) 'The Claims of Labour' (1845), all in Dissertations and Discussions political, philosohical, historical' London: Longman Green Reader and Dyer (1867) Mill, John Stuart. 1989 fp 1859. "On Liberty." Pp. 5-115 in On Liberty and other writings, edited by S. Collini. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Mill, John Stuart. 1962 fp 1861. Utilitarianism. Glasgow: Collins. Mill, John Stuart. 1972 fp 1861. "Considerations on Representative Government." Pp. 187-428 in Utilitarianism, On Liberty and Considerations on Representative Government, edited by H. B. Acton. London: J.M.Dent and Sons. Morton, F.L. 1984. "Sexual Equality and the Family in Tocqueville's Democracy in America." Canadian Journal of Political Science 17:309-324. Owen, Robert. 1991 fp 1813-16. A New View of Society and other writings. Harmondsworth: Penguin. Pappε, Η.Ο. 1964. "Mill and Tocqueville." Journal of the History of Ideas 25:217-234. Pickering, Mary. 1993. "Auguste Comte and the Saint-Simonians." French Historical Studies 18:211- 236. Pitkin, Hannah Fenichel. 1990. "Slippery Bentham: Some Neglected Cracks in the Foundation of Utilitarianism." Political Theory 18:104-131. Richter, Melvin. 1963. "Tocqueveille on Algeria." The Review of Politics 25:362-398. Rosenblum, Nancy L. 1973. "Bentham's Social Psychology for Legislators." Political Theory 1:171-185. Ryan, Alan. 1972. "Utilitarianism and bureaucracy: the views of J. S. Mill." in Studies in the Growth of Nineteenth Century Government, edited by G. Sutherland. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. Saint-Simon, Henri Selected Writings on Science, Industry and Social Organisation (Keith Taylor ed) London: Croom Helm (1975) Scaff, Lawrence A. 1973. "Max Weber's Politics and Political Education." American Political Science Review 67:128-141. Scaff, Lawrence. 1989. Fleeing the Iron Cage: Culture Politics and Modernity in the Thought of Max Weber. Berkeley: Universithy of California Press. Spencer, Herbert, Political Writing (John Offer ed) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (1994) Stedman Jones, Gareth. 2004. "Saint-Simon and the Liberal Origins of the Socialist Critique of Political Economy." in French Political Economy 1650-1848. Stanford Centre for Interdisciplinary Studies. Thoreau, Henry David. 1849. "Resistance to Civil Government." vol. e book 71: The Project Gutenberg. Thoreau, Henry David. 1971 fp 1854. Walden: or a life in the woods. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Tocqueville, Alexis de. 2003 fp 1837-1847. Seconde Lettre sur l'Algerie, suivie de Rapport sur l'Algerie. Paris: Editions Mille et Une Nuits. Tocqueville, Alexis de. 2001 fp 1833-1843. Writings on Empire and Slavery. Baltimore Md: Johns Hopkins University Press. Tocqueville, Alexis de. 1945 fp English 1835/1840. Democracy in America, vol. Vols I and II. New York: Vintage Books. Tocqueville, Alexis de. 1966 fp French 1856. The Ancien Regime and the French Revolution. Translated by S. Gilbert. London: Fontana. Villa, Dana R. 2005. "Hegel, Tocqueville and 'Individualism'." The Review of Politics 67:659-686. Weber, Max. 1994 fp German 1895. "The Nation State and Economic Policy (Inaugural Lecture)." in Weber Political Writings, edited by P. Lassman and R. Speirs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Weber, Max. 1985 fp German 1904. The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. Translated by T. Parsons. London: George Allen and Unwin. Weber, Max. 1948 fp 1919. "Science as a Vocation." Pp. 129-156 in From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, edited by H.H.Gerth and C. W. Mills. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. Weber, Max. 1994 fp German 1919. "The Profession and Vocation of Politics." Pp. 309-369 in Weber Political Writings, edited by P. Lassman and R. Speirs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Weber, Max. 1949. On The Methodology of the Social Sciences. Glencoe, Ill: The Free Press. Weber, Max. 1978 fp German 1921. Economy and Society. Berkeley Ca: University of California Press. Whitman, Walt 1855 first ed Leaves of Grass in The complete poems Penguin (1975). .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Examining the Philosophical Inconsistencies of Libertarian Paternalism
    Munich Personal RePEc Archive The Curious Case of Choice Architect: Examining the Philosophical Inconsistencies of Libertarian Paternalism Kuriakose, Francis and Kylasam Iyer, Deepa Erasmus University Rotterdam, University of Cambridge 24 April 2017 Online at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/84842/ MPRA Paper No. 84842, posted 06 Nov 2019 16:37 UTC The Curious Case of Choice Architect: Examining the Philosophical Inconsistencies of Libertarian Paternalism Francis Kuriakose and Deepa Kylasam Iyer April 2017 Abstract Classical economics works on the principle that individuals are rational and make decisions to maximize their self interest. However in real situations, individuals face a conflict between rational and irrational selves leading to decision making that does not leave them better off. Libertarian paternalism proposes a solution to this rationality problem in an individual by conceiving a choice architect. Choice architect is a third party capable of arriving at what a perfectly rational choice would be and ‘nudges’ an individual towards making that choice. Libertarian paternalists claim that choice architect does not interfere with the freedom of an individual because the choices he offers are easily reversible, i.e, an individual can reject it at any given point in time. Libertarian Paternalism seems to offer the third way between absolute autonomy of individual choice (libertarianism) and third party intervention (paternalism). This paper argues that the conception of a choice architect comes out of a hasty commitment to reconciling libertarianism and paternalism by placing perfect rationality and autonomy in two separate individuals in the case of a single decision making process. The paper proposes alternatives to confront the rationality problem.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Look at Max Weber and His Anglo-German Family Connections1
    P1: JLS International Journal of Politics, Culture and Society [ijps] PH231-474840-07 October 28, 2003 17:46 Style file version Nov. 19th, 1999 International Journal of Politics, Culture and Society, Vol. 17, No. 2, Winter 2003 (C 2003) II. Review Essay How Well Do We Know Max Weber After All? A New Look at Max Weber and His Anglo-German Family Connections1 Lutz Kaelber2 Guenther Roth’s study places Max Weber in an intricate network of ties among members of his lineage. This paper presents core findings of Roth’s analysis of Weber’s family relations, discusses the validity of Roth’s core theses and some of the implications of his analysis for Weber as a person and scholar, and addresses how Roth’s book may influence future approaches to Weber’s sociology. KEY WORDS: Max Weber; history of sociology; classical sociology; German history; Guenther Roth. “How well do we know Max Weber?”—When the late Friedrich H. Tenbruck (1975) raised this question almost thirty years ago, he had Weber’s scholarship in mind. The analysis of Weber’s oeuvre and the debate over it, fueled by a steady trickle of contributions of the Max Weber Gesamtaus- gabe, has not abated since. Thanks to the Gesamtausgabe’s superbly edited volumes, we now know more about Weber the scholar than ever before, even though the edition’s combination of exorbitant pricing and limitation to German-language editions has slowed its international reception. Tenbruck’s question might be applied to Weber’s biography as well. Here, too, the Gesamtausgabe, particularly with the edition of his personal letters, has been a valuable tool for research.1 Yet the fact remains that what we know about Weber the person derives to a significant extent from 1Review essay of Guenther Roth, Max Webers deutsch-englische Familiengeschichte, 1800–1950.
    [Show full text]
  • Grading: All Readings Will Be Posted on the Yale Canvas Course Website
    Sociology 151 FOUNDATIONS OF MODERN SOCIAL THEORY Summer 2020 Session A: May 25th-June 26th Professor Julia Adams [email protected] Summer Office Hours: flexible: after class or by appointment ***Class meets M,W,F, 9-11:15 am, on Zoom*** Hobbes; Locke; Montesquieu; Rousseau; Martineau; Mill; Hegel; Marx; Weber; Durkheim. In this concentrated survey course, students explore the writings of classical Western theorists of social and political life in modernity, as they tackle key problems and challenges that continue to preoccupy us today. Modern social life and social science arose in tandem, and this class focuses on the ways that the classical theorists made sense of the beginning of capitalism; individualism and alienation; the family; religion; power struggles and the rise of states. Most important, in this class you will begin to develop your own thoughts and arguments, built on the foundation of modern social theory. The course format combines orienting lectures and seminar-style class discussions and debates. There are two take-home exams, the first due on or before June 12, and the second on or before the last day of class. Students will also write an essay, due on or before the last day of class. Detailed exam review sheets and potential essay topics will be distributed in advance. Grading: Attendance and participation, 10% … Exams, 50% … Essay, 40% … …of the final grade. All readings will be posted on the Yale Canvas course website SCHEDULE May 25, Monday: Welcome; Social Theory; General Organization of Course May 27, Wednesday: The Problem of Social Order: Hobbes Thomas Hobbes, Leviathan Selections (emphasis on chapters 6-8, 11-14, 17, 30) May 29, Friday: Equality, Freedom, Property, and Dissent: Locke John Locke, Second Treatise of Government Selections (posted) June 1, Monday: The Division of Political Powers: Montesquieu Montesquieu, The Spirit of the Laws Part I, Book 1-3, pp.
    [Show full text]
  • Jeremy Bentham, Liberalism and the Science of International
    Faculty of Law Victoria University of Wellington Foundations on Silt: Jeremy Bentham, Liberalism and the Science of International Law Research Paper History and Theory of International Law (LAWS 540) Robert Deuchars 1 Contents 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 3 2. BENTHAM VS BLACKSTONE ........................................................................................ 5 3. INTERNATIONAL LAW AND THE PRINCIPLE OF UTILITY ................................. 8 4. THE CODIFICATION OF INTERNATIONAL LAW .................................................. 15 5. CONCLUSION ................................................................................................................... 19 Word count: 7,522 (excluding footnotes). 2 1. Introduction When the words good or bad are uttered the user generally takes their meaning derived from a system of ethics or morals. In this sense good and bad are particularist in nature and also socio-culturally specific. Let us take a simple example from Antiquity. At school in the West we learn of a figure called Alexander the Great, the Macedonian. By all accounts we are taught that he was a great, and by extension a good man. In modern day Iran Alexander of Macedonia is known as Alexander the Devil. So the question arises: was Alexander good or bad , or both? Is it possible to state unequivocally that the actions of Alexander were as a matter of fact morally good or morally bad ? I think the answer to this question is fairly straightforward: it depends. Now this answer is not a simple descent into postmodern territory and moral relativism; there are genuine and empirical reasons to believe all three possibilities pertaining to the actions of Alexander. In short it is not possible to extrapolate from the particular to the general and it is not a question of semantics or even of critical hermeneutics.
    [Show full text]
  • Sandage, Ph.D
    79‐245, Fall 2019 Dr. Scott A. Sandage, Ph.D. Classroom: Baker 237B Associate Professor of History Office: Baker Hall 236B [email protected] Office Hours: Tues 8am‐9am & by appt. Office phone: 412/268‐2878 Capitalism and Individualism in American Culture Are you what you do? Will your career choice and achievements define who you are, how you feel about yourself, and how others see you as a person? This course explores the cultural history of American capitalism through three ongoing themes: 1) the relation between work and identity; and 2) the concept of individualism; and 3) the historical origins of your opinions on 1&2. Learning and skills objectives include: To be able to explain how work (and attitudes toward it) have changed from the eighteenth to the twenty‐first century; To be able to read critically, relating different genres of writing, from different historical periods, to the main themes of the course; and To be able to write analytically, integrating multiple sources including your own judgments, in both formal (essays) and informal (journal) styles. There are no exams (except short, unannounced readings quizzes, if necessary). Instead, students will keep a journal (collected at regular intervals) and write four essays, three short (750‐1250 words) and one longer (1250‐1500 words). Grading criteria: Grading weights are as follows: journal = 25%; first short essay = 10%; second short essay = 15%; third short essay = 15%; final essay = 25%; attendance and participation = 10%. Required Readings: Benjamin Franklin, Autobiography (Dover edition) Frederick Douglass, Narrative of the Life (Dover) Ralph Waldo Emerson, Self‐Reliance and Other Essays (Dover) Henry David Thoreau, Walden (Dover) Henry David Thoreau, Civil Disobedience and Other Essays (Dover) Charlotte Perkins Gilman, Women and Economics (Dover) Arthur Miller, The Death of a Salesman (Penguin) Malcolm Gladwell, Outliers: The Story of Success (Back Bay) Additional required readings are available (PDF) at https://canvas.cmu.edu/.
    [Show full text]
  • Dilemmas in Liberal Democratic Thought Since Max Weber
    Richard Wellen Dilemmas In Liberal Democratic Thought Since Max Weber Wellen, Richard Dilemmas in Liberal Democratic Thought Since Max Weber ISBN: 978-0-9738413-0-5 First edition published in 1996 by Peter Lang Publishing, Inc., New York. © by Richard Wellen This work is licensed by Richard Wellen under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc- nd/3.0/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, 444 Castro Street, Suite 900, Mountain View, California, 94041, USA. Anyone is free to copy, distribute and transmit this work on condition that the work is attributed to the author, that it is not used or distributed for commercial purposes and that it is not altered, transformed or used as a source for derivative works. Author’s contact information: [email protected] For Sally, Sarah and Ruthie Contents Acknowledgements ix 1. Weber’s Challenge to Political Thought 1 2. The Necessity of Choice: Toward a 31 Convergence of Personality and Politics 3. Liberalism as a Moral Tradition: 57 Vice as Virtue? 4. The Modernization of Political Reason: 83 Reflections on Habermas 5. The Crisis of Liberalism in Social Science: 111 Strauss on Weber 6. Rorty’s End of Philosophy: 135 A New Beginning for Liberalism? 7. On the Moral Contingency of 159 Liberal Democratic Politics Bibliography Index Acknowledgements The idea of addressing the relevance of Max Weber's work to contemporary political thought was suggested to me by John O'Neill during the formative stages of this project.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise of Liberal Utilitarianism: Bentham and Mill Piers Norris
    The Rise of Liberal Utilitarianism: Bentham and Mill Piers Norris Turner, Ohio State University [DRAFT: final version forthcoming in The Blackwell Companion to 19th Century Philosophy, ed. J.A. Shand] I. Introduction By the turn of the nineteenth century, Jeremy Bentham (1748-1832) was a well-known moral and legal reformer. A child of the Enlightenment, writing at the time of the American and French revolutions, Bentham had offered wide-ranging critiques of customary institutions and ways of thinking. He was particularly critical of appeals to natural law and intuition that, consciously or not, provided mere cover stories for people’s preferences. Such appeals, he argued, fail to provide real reasons: The various systems that have been formed concerning the standard of right and wrong… consist all of them in so many contrivances for avoiding the obligation of appealing to any external standard, and for prevailing upon the reader to accept of the author’s sentiment or opinion as a reason in itself. (An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation [IPML], II.14; B i.8)1 Because these cover stories are guided by people’s preferences, Bentham also argued that they are incapable of grounding a principled and well-organized set of public institutions. They instead protect established powers, whose likes and dislikes carry the most weight. His earliest writings, for instance, detail how the vagaries of the common law served entrenched interests rather than the public at large. What Bentham needed was a public principle that could guide a scientific program of legal codification and political reform.
    [Show full text]
  • HUME and MILL on "UTILITY of RELIGION": a BORGEAN GARDEN of FORKING PATHS?L
    TEAO~ Reuista Iberoamericana de Estudios Utilitaristas-2005, XlVII: 117-129 ISSN 1132-0877 HUME AND MILL ON "UTILITY OF RELIGION": A BORGEAN GARDEN OF FORKING PATHS?l JOSE L. TASSET2 University ofA Coruiia ABSTRACT This work is not a specific assessment of Utility ofReligion by John Stuart Mill, but a defence of what I think is a utilitarian, but not millian, view on the problem that work states, the question of the utility of religion in contemporary societies. I construct that view from neohumeanism more than from millian positions, notwithstanding, I postulate that view as a genuine utilitarian one. Every cultural tradition makes a different approach to ethical and political theories. Spanish and Ibero-American utilitarians make precisely it with Clas­ sical Utilitarianism. From that point of view, Ibero-American people identifies utilitarianism with radical and enlightened tradition linked with the reform that through XVIIIth and XIXth centuries tried to undermine the foundations of conservative society in our nations. This aim was not achieved, at least not completely; because of that, the pursuit of Utilitarianism remains opened between us. In the end,I will argue that Spanish and Ibero-American utilitarians connect utilitarianism with philosophical and political radicalism, and inside that His­ panic utilitarianism, plays an important role the criticism of social and political functions of Religion. Maybe, part of the future of Utilitarianism in our cultural context depends on a return of the Theory to its radical roots, also in religious subjects. Keywords: J ohn Stuart Mill, David Hume, Jorge Luis Borges, religion, deism, theism, functionalism, truth. RESUMEN Este trabajo no pretende ser una evaluaci6n especifica de la Utilidad de la Religi6n de John Stuart Mill, sino una defensa de 10 que creo es una posici6n 1 Date of acceptance: 26/07/2006.
    [Show full text]
  • Critique of the Doctrine of Inalienable, Natural Rights
    Critique of the Doctrine of Inalienable, Natural Rights JEREMY BENTHAM From Jeremy Bentham, Anarchical Fallacies, vol. 2 of Bowring (ed.), Works, 1843. PRELIMINARY OBSERVATIONS The Declaration of Rights -- I mean the paper published under that name by the French National Assembly in 1791 -- assumes for its subject-matter a field of disquisition as unbounded in point of extent as it is important in its nature. But the more ample the extent given to any proposition or string of propositions, the more difficult it is to keep the import of it confined without deviation, within the bounds of truth and reason. If in the smallest corners of the field it ranges over, it fail of coinciding with the line of rigid rectitude, no sooner is the aberration pointed out, than (inasmuch as there is no medium between truth and falsehood) its pretensions to the appellation of truism are gone, and whoever looks upon it must recognise it to be false and erroneous, -- and if, as here, political conduct be the theme, so far as the error extends and fails of being detected, pernicious. In a work of such extreme importance with a view to practice, and which Throughout keeps practice so closely and immediately and professedly in view, a single error may be attended with the most fatal consequences. The more extensive the propositions, the more consummate will be the knowledge, the more exquisite the skill, indispensably requisite to confine them in all points within the pale of truth. The most consummate ability in the whole nation could not have been too much for the task -- one may venture to say, it would not have been equal to it.
    [Show full text]
  • Montesquieu on Commerce, Conquest, War, and Peace
    MONTESQUIEU ON COMMERCE, CONQUEST, WAR, AND PEACE Robert Howse* I. INTRODUCTION:COMMERCE AS THE AGENT OF PEACE:MONTESQUIEU AND THE IDEOLOGY OF LIBERALISM n the history of liberalism, Montesquieu, who died two hundred and Ififty years ago, is an iconic figure. Montesquieu is cited as the source of the idea of checks and balances, or separation of powers, and thus as an intellectual inspiration of the American founding.1 Among liberal internationalists, Montesquieu is known above all for the notion that international trade leads to peace among nation-states. When liberal international relations theorists such as Michael Doyle attribute this posi- tion to Montesquieu,2 they cite Book XX of the Spirit of the Laws,3 in which Montesquieu claims: “The natural effect of commerce is to bring peace. Two nations that negotiate between themselves become recipro- cally dependent, if one has an interest in buying and the other in selling. And all unions are based on mutual needs.”4 On its own, Montesquieu’s claim raises many issues. Montesquieu’s point is that trade based on mutual dependency discourages war. Here, Montesquieu abstracts entirely from the relative power of the states in question, a concern that is pervasive in his concrete analyses of relation- ships among political communities. For example, later on in the same section of the Spirit of the Laws he mentions that trade relations between Carthage and Marseille led to jealousy and a security conflict: There were, in the early times, great wars between Carthage and Mar- seille concerning the fishery. After the peace, they competed in eco- nomic commerce.
    [Show full text]
  • Information Libertarianism
    Information Libertarianism Jane R. Bambauer & Derek E. Bambauer* Legal scholarship has attacked recent First Amendment jurisprudence as unprincipled: a deregulatory judicial agenda disguised as free speech protection. This scholarly trend is mistaken. Descriptively, free speech protections scrutinize only information regulation, usefully pushing government to employ more direct regulations with fewer collateral consequences. Even an expansive First Amendment is compatible with the regulatory state, rather than being inherently libertarian. Normatively, courts should be skeptical when the state tries to design socially beneficial censorship. This Article advances a structural theory that complements classic First Amendment rationales, arguing that information libertarianism has virtues that transcend political ideology. Regulating information is peculiarly difficult to do well. Cognitive biases cause regulators to systematically overstate risks of speech and to discount its benefits. Speech is strong in its capacity to change behavior, yet politically weak. It is a popular scapegoat for larger societal problems and its regulation is an attractive option for interest groups seeking an advantage. Collective action, public choice, and government entrenchment problems arise frequently. First Amendment safeguards provide a vital counterpressure. Information libertarianism encourages government to regulate conduct directly because when the state censors communication, the results are often DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.15779/Z38Z31NN40 Copyright
    [Show full text]
  • Philosophy of Anti-Slavery
    Nathaniel Adam Tobias Coleman [email protected] • http://natcphd.me PHIL3061: The philosophy of anti-slavery Slavery. It was wrong, wasn't it? That much we know. Yet, why was it wrong? The societies that benefitted from slavery had to be convinced that it was wrong. Indeed, they had to be persuaded to give it up. Moreover, for them, it was not enough that the case for slavery was shown to be unsound; they wanted to hear the case against slavery. Although we don't need to be persuaded by the case against slavery, we struggle to explain exactly what that case is. For this reason, we will revisit, analyse, and evaluate some of the arguments historically used to explain the wrongness of slavery. To do this, we shall focus on a period of time that we might call 'the longer eighteenth century of British abolitionism': it begins with the Germantown Protest of 1688 and ends, 150 years later, with the final emancipation of all persons enslaved-as-negro in the British Empire, in 1838. However, we frame our investigation by the anglophone world established by British imperialism, not because Britain's abolition of negro slavery was the first—no, that occurred in St-Domingue (later Haiti), in 1793—but rather because Britain currently enjoys (deservedly or not) special moral praise for its 'leading' contribution to the emancipation of all persons enslaved-as-negro, across all the European empires. Ultimately, by evaluating the arguments of (1) European abolitionists, (2) enslaved Africans, and (3) Haitian revolutionaries, we will grasp the place that these arguments occupy in the broader philosophical debate among three major moral theories: (a) the utilitarian idea that a policy is wrong, if its painful results outweigh its pleasurable results, (b) the theory of natural rights, according to which a policy is wrong, if it violates a person's human right, and (c) the theory of human flourishing, according to which a policy is wrong, if it corrupts a person's character.
    [Show full text]