DOCSLIB.ORG

Perez in Supportof Appelleesand Supportingaffirmance

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Perez in Supportof Appelleesand Supportingaffirmance Nos. 06-2218 & 06-2317 INTHE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTHCIRCUIT WILLLAMCRAWFORD, UNITED SENIOR ACTION OF INDIANA,INDIANAPOLIS RESOURCE CENTERFOR INDEPENDENTLIVING, et al., Plain tiffs -Appellan ts, v. TODDROKITA, in hs official capacity as In&ana Secretary of State, J. BRADLEYKING, in his official capacity as co-&rector of In&ana Election Division, KRISTIROBERTSON, in her official capacity as co-director of Indiana Election Division, et al., Defen dants -Appellees. INDIANADEMOCRATIC PARTY and M~ARIoNCOUNTY DEMOCRATICCENTRAL COMMITTEE, Plain tifis -Appellan ts, v. TODDROKITA, in hs official capacity as Indiana Secretary of State, J. BRADLEYKING, in hs official capacity as co-director of In&ana Election Division, KRISTIROBERTSON, in her official capacity as co-director of Indiana Election Division, et al., Defendants -Appellees. APPEALFROM THE UNITEDSTATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERNDISTRICT OF INDIANA CASENO. 1:05-CV-0634-SEB-VSS THE HONORABLESARAH EVANS BARKER BRIEFOF &CI Cmm ERICA AN CENTERFOR VOTINGRIGHTS LEGISLATIVE FUND AND VINCENTI. PEREZ IN SUPPORTOF APPELLEESAND SUPPORTINGAFFIRMANCE Mark F. (Thor) Hearne, I1 Reginald J. Brown Natio~alCounsel, ACVR Daniel Levin LATHROP& GAGE L.C. Todd Zubler 10 South Broadway, 13th Floor David S. Wolf Saint Louis, Missouri 63102 WILMERCUTLER PICKERING (314) 613-2522 mEAND DORRLLP 1875 Pennsylvania Avenue, N. W. Washington, D.C. 20006 (202) 663-6000 RULE 26.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Amicus curiae American Center for Voting Rights Legislative Fund ("ACVR") is a nonstock corporation operating under section 501(c)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code. ACVR has no parent corporation, and because it has no stock, no publicly held company owns 10% or more of its stock. The law firms whose partners or associates have appeared for ACVR and amicus curiae Vincent I. Perez in this case (including proceedings in the district court) or are expected to appear in this Court are Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP and Lathrop & Gage L.C. Todd Zubler Attorney for Amici Curiae American Center for Voting Righ ts Legisla tive Fund and Vincent I, Perez TABLE OF CONTENTS RULE 26.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT ............................................... i ... TABLE OF AUTHORITIES .................................................................. .in INTERESTS OF THE AMICI ................................................................. 1 SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT ................................................................. 2 ARGUMENT ........................................................................................... 5 Photo ID Laws Are Reasonable, Nondiscriminatory Efforts To Prevent Fraud and Increase Voter Confidence ............................ 5 A. Photo ID Laws Support Important Government Interests .................................................................................... 7 13. Photo ID Provisions Are a Reasonable Response to Voter Fraud and Impose at Most a Minor Burden on the Right To Vote .................................................. 22 C. Photo ID Rules Are Nondiscriminatory ................................. 30 CONCLUSION ...................................................................................... 33 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE TBLE OF AUTHORITIES CASES BuckIey v. Valeo. 424 U.S. 1 (1976) ........................................................ 14 hdickv . Takushi. 504 U.S. 428 (1992)........................................... 3. 5-6 Clingman v. Beaver. 544 U.S. 581 (2005)......................................... 3, 5,6 Exparte Yarbrough. 110 U.S. 651 (1884).............................................. 7-8 Federal Election Commission v. National Rig6 t to Work Committee. 459 U.S. 197 (1982) ....................................................... 13, 14 First National Bank of Boston v. Bellotti, 435 U.S. 765 (1978)............... 7 Gonzalez v. Arizona. No . CV 06*1268.PHX.ROS7 2006 WL 1707956 (D . Ariz . June 19. 2006) .................................. 21 Griffin v. Roupas. 385 F.3d 1128 (7th Cir. 2004)~cert . denied, 544 U.S. 923 (2005) ................................................................... 8. 30 McConnell v. Federal Election Commission. 540 U .S . 9 3 (2003) .......... 14 McDonald v. Board of Hection Commissioners. 394 U.S. 802 (1969)................................................................................................. 15. 30 Munro v. Socialist Workers Party, 479 U .S . 189 (1986) ......................... 13 Pabey v. Pastrick. 816 N.E.2d 1138 (Ind. 2004) ..................................... 22 Reynolds v. Sims. 377 U.S. 533 (1964) ............................................ 7.8. 20 Storer v. Brown. 415 U.S. 724 (1974) ....................................................... 2 Timmons v. Twin CjtiesArea Newparty, 520 U.S. 351 (1997)......... 6. 13 Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma. Inc.. 348 U.S. 483 (1955) ....... 15 STATUTES AND LEGISLATIVE IIVILATERWS 152 Cong. Rec . S5050-62 (daily ed. May 24. 2006) ................................. 21 H.R. Rep . No . 105-416 (1998) .................................................................. 21 Fla . Stat. 101.043 ................................................................................. 24 Ga . Code Ann . 21-2-417(a) ................................................................... 24 Hawaii Rev . Stat. § 11-136 ..................................................................... 24 Ind. Code § 3-6-7-1.................................................................................. 18 Ind . Code § 3.10.1.7.2(3) ........................................................................ 28 Ind. Code § 3.11.7.5.1 ........................................................................ 28, 29 Ind . Code § 3.11.7.5.2.5 ........................................................................... 28 Ind. Code § 3.11.8.10.5 ........................................................................... 18 Ind. Code § 3-11-8-19............................................................................... 22 Ind. Code § 3-11.8.25.1(e) ........................................................................ 28 Ind. Code 3.11.10.1.2 ............................................................................ 28 Ind. Code 8 3-11-10-24(a)........................................................................ 28 Ind. Code § 9-24-16-10............................................................................. 28 La . Rev . Stat. Ann . 18:562(A)(2) ......................................................... 24 Mo . Rev . Stat. 115.427..................................................................... 24-25 iv REAL ID Act of 2005. Pub . L . No . 109.13. 119 Stat. 302 (2005) ............ 28 5 201(3) ........................................................................................... 28 § 202(a)(l) ...................................................................................... 27 § 202(c) ........................................................................................... 27 § 202(d) ........................................................................................... 27 § 202(d)(l) ...................................................................................... 27 42 U.S.C. § 15484 .................................................................................... 24 S.D. Codified Laws § 12.18.6.1 ............................................................... 25 REGULATION 140 Ind. Admin . Code 7-4-1to -3 ........................................................... 20 MISCELLANEOUS American Center For Voting Rights. Vote Fraud, Intimidation & Suppression in the 2004 Presidential Election (Aug. 2005) ................... 9 American Center for Voting Rights. Press Release. ACVR Legislative Fund Appla uds NBC/WSJ Poll Finding 80% Support for Photo ID Requirement (April 30. 2006) ................................................................ 23 American Center for Voting Rights. Press Release. Missourians Strongly Favor ID Plan (March 23. 2006) ............................................ 23 American Center for Voting Rights. Press Release. Pennsylvanians Support IZ)Requirement at the Polls (Jan. 30. 2006) ...................................................................................................... 23 Amy Sherman. Double .Voters' Names Going to Prosecutors. Miami Herald. Nov . 14. 2004 ............................................................................ 11 Brief and Appendix for Michigan Republican Party as Amicus Curiae, In re Request for Advisory Opinion Regarding ConstitutionalityofZ005P.A. 71, No. 130589 (Mich. filed July 19, 2006) ..................................................................................................... 10 Commission on Federal Election Reform, Building Confidence in US. Elections (Sept. 2005) .......................................................... 4, 8, 9, 28 Dan McKay, Voter Picture ID Has Mde Support, Albuquerque Journal, Aug. 24, 2005 ................................................ 25, 26 David Decamp, Double Voting Being Investigated, Fla. Times- Union, Jan. 25, 2005 .............................................................................. 11 Erik Siemers, A CLU Sues Clerk Over City's New Voter ID Rule, Albuquerque Tribune, Oct. 28, 2005 ....................................................... 25 Geoff Dougherty, Dead Voters on Rolls, Other Glitches Found in 6 Key States, Chi. Tribune, Dec. 4, 2004 ................................................... 10 Greg J. Borowski,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • June 2021 COVID-19 Report of Senate District 26
    Ju2012ly 2021 COVID-19 Report of Senate District 26 A Special Report to Senator Ronald M. Winterton Prepared by the Strategic Initiatives Group Office of Legislative Research and General Counsel Membership of the Utah State Senate District Senator 1 Luz Escamilla 2 Derek L. Kitchen 3 Gene Davis 4 Jani Iwamoto 5 Karen Mayne 6 Wayne A. Harper 7 Michael K. McKell 8 Kathleen A. Riebe 9 Kirk A. Cullimore 10 Lincoln Fillmore 11 Daniel McCay 12 Daniel W. Thatcher 13 Jacob L. Anderegg 14 Michael S. Kennedy 15 Keith Grover 16 Curtis S. Bramble 17 Scott D. Sandall 18 Ann Millner 19 John D. Johnson 20 David G. Buxton 21 Jerry W. Stevenson 22 J. Stuart Adams 23 Todd D. Weiler 24 Derrin R. Owens 25 Chris H. Wilson 26 Ronald M. Winterton 27 David P. Hinkins 28 Evan J. Vickers 29 Don L. Ipson as of July 1, 2021 UTAH SENATE Location of Cities and Districts Senate Districts Legend City City City City County Senate District Weber and Davis County Senate Districts 17 WEBER 20 19 18 MORGAN DAVIS 22 21 Salt Lake County Senate Districts 19 23 23 2 1 1 Utah County Senate Districts 11 26 14 3 5 4 16 13 12 15 8 6 9 7 10 27 24 11 13 14 COVID-19 Report of Senate District 26 July 2021 Prepared by the Strategic Initiatives Group Jerry Howe, Manager Joseph Wade Office of Legislative Research and General Counsel Using data provided by the Utah Department of Health and U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey 5-Yr Estimates 2015-2019 Utah State Capitol Complex, House Building Suite W210 Salt Lake City, Utah 84114-5210 Data Notes We would like to acknowledge the Utah Department of Health for its cooperation in providing the data that makes this report possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Constituent Relationship Management for State Legislators
    In Coordination with the Council of State Governments-WEST Constituent Relationship Management for State Legislators The Graduate School of Political Management - The George Washington University INSTITUTE FOR POLITICS, DEMOCRACY & THE INTERNET ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This white paper, “Constituent Relationship Management for State Legislators,” was commissioned by the Council of State Governments-WEST (www.csgwest.org) and compiled by The George Washington University’s Institute for Politics, Democracy & the Internet (www.ipdi.org). Julie Barko Germany, director of IPDI, was the principle author and editor of this report. Max McGowen, an undergraduate researcher at IPDI, compiled research for this report. Mary Lou Cooper of CSG-WEST provided invaluable guidance and advice and cultivated interviews for this report. This project benefited greatly from the advice and assistance of many individuals. We especially thank all of our interviewees – the state legislators and technology experts whose work is profiled in this report: Ric Cantrell, Mike Doogan, Lee Harris, Kevin Hayes, Janice E. Arnold-Jones, Paul Mouritsen and Bud Richmond. We would also like to thank the Washington, DC-based technologists who provided background material, research, and writing for this report: Daniel Bennett, Peter Churchill, Bruce Culbert, Paul Greenberg, Jeff Mascott, and Christopher Massicotte, Nick Schaper, Thomas Vanderwal, and Ken Ward. Alex Kellner assisted with editing. IPDI’s mission is to promote the use of the Internet and new communication technologies in
    [Show full text]
  • Utah State Senate
    UTAH STATE SENATE UTAH STATE CAPITOL • COMPLEX 320 STATE CAPITOL P.O. BOX 145115 • SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5515 • (801) 538-1035 FIRST REVISED AGENDA TO: Members of the Senate Education Standing Committee FROM: Sen. Ann Millner, Chair RE: Committee Meeting DATE: Monday, February 13, 2017 TIME: 8:00 AM PLACE: 210 Senate Building - Call to order and approval of minutes - The following bills are scheduled for consideration: 1. SB0186 Education Reporting Amendments (L. Fillmore) (rmb/arg) 2. SB0190 Education Computing Pathways (R. Okerlund) (va/nwb) 3. HB0043 American Indian and Alaskan Native Education Amendments (M. Noel) (po/jtw) 4. HB0114S01 Local School Entity Amendments (B. R. Cutler) (va/nwb) COMMITTEE MEMBERS Sen. Ann Millner, Chair Sen. J. Stuart Adams Sen. Deidre M. Henderson Sen. Lyle W. Hillyard Sen. Jani Iwamoto Sen. Wayne L. Niederhauser Sen. Howard A. Stephenson Committee Analyst: Nathan W. Brady, Office of Legislative Research and General Counsel Committee Secretary: Lorna Wells In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, persons needing auxiliary communicative aids and services for this meeting should call the Office of Legislative Research and General Counsel at 801-538-1032 or use Relay Utah (toll-free in-state 7-1-1 or Spanish language 888-346-3162), giving at least 48 hours notice or the best notice practicable. Every effort will be made to accommodate requests for aids and services for effective communication during the annual General Session. However, given the unpredictable and fast-paced nature of the legislative process, it is essential that you notify us as soon as possible. Failure to do so may, in some circumstances, result in our inability to accommodate your request.
    [Show full text]
  • Western Legislative Academy Class of 2010
    WESTERN LEGISLATIVE ACADEMY CLASS OF 2010 ALASKA In- Session Out- of- Session Representative Bryce Edgmon Alaska House of Representatives State Capitol, Room 416 716 W. 4th Ave., Suite 390 Juneau, AK 99801 Anchorage, AK 99501 Phone: (907) 465-4451 Phone: (907) 269-0275 Fax: (907) 465-3445 Fax: (907) 269-0274 [email protected] Representative Bob Herron Alaska House of Representatives State Capitol, Room 411 PO Box 886 Juneau, AK 99801 Bethel, AK 99559 Phone: (907) 465-4942 Phone: (907) 543-5898 Fax: (907) 465-4589 Fax: (907) 543-5892 [email protected] Representative Scott Kawasaki Alaska House of Representatives State Capitol, Room 428 1292 Sadler Way, Suite 308 Juneau, AK 99801 Fairbanks, AZ 99701 Phone: (907) 465-3466 Phone: (907) 456-7423 Fax: (907) 465-2937 Fax: (907) 451-9293 [email protected] CSG-WEST●1107 9th Street, Suite 730 ● Sacramento, CA 95814 ● Phone (916) 553-4423 ● www.csgwest.org Out-of-session addresses were included only in cases where legislators listed them on public sites. If you would like to add an address or make a correction, please write the information on a sheet of paper and give to CSG-WEST staff. WESTERN LEGISLATIVE ACADEMY CLASS OF 2010 ARIZONA In- Session Out- of- Session Representative Matt Heinz Arizona House of Representatives 1700 W. Washington, Room 126 Phoenix, AZ 85007 Phone: (602) 926-3424 Fax: (602) 417-3129 [email protected] Representative Lynne Pancrazi Arizona House of Representatives 1700 W. Washington, Room 324 Phoenix, AZ 85007 Phone: (602) 926-3004 Fax: (602) 417-3179 [email protected] Representative Daniel Patterson Arizona House of Representatives 1700 W.
    [Show full text]
  • Read the 2020 Utah Statewide Voter Information Pamphlet
    GENERAL ELECTION TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 3, 2020 POLLS ARE OPEN FROM 7:00 A.M. TO 8:00 P.M. ON ELECTION DAY BALLOTS BEGIN BEING MAILED OCTOBER 13 UTAH’S OFFICIAL VOTER INFORMATION PAMPHLET Note: This electronic version of the voter information pamphlet contains general voting information for all Utah voters. To view voting information that is specific to you, visit vote.utah.gov, enter your address, and click on “Sample Ballot, Profiles, Issues.” For audio and braille versions of the voter information pamphlet, please visit blindlibrary.utah.gov. VOTE.UTAH.GOV A message from the Elections Office Utah Voter, Welcome to Utah’s 2020 General Election Voter Information Pamphlet. We designed this pamphlet to provide voters accross our state with important information that will help them navigate the upcoming election. Each of our elections is unique, and this one is no different. Voters across the state will embark on making decisions that will guide the government that they have for years to come. Throughout this pamphlet you will find information on the candidates that will represent you federally, in statewide office, in the state senate and state house, and on the state board of education. You will be able to read about the seven Constitutional Amendments that will appear on your ballot as well as judicial retention elections. In this pamphlet you will also find information aimed at helping you with the voting process like voter registration, voting methods, and communicating with your county clerk’s office. If you have questions about this information or the voting process, there is contact information for your local elections officials on page 129.
    [Show full text]
  • State Legislative Seats That Changed Party Control, 2018 - Ballotpedia
    10/14/2019 State legislative seats that changed party control, 2018 - Ballotpedia View PDF - Start Here Free PDF Viewer - View PDF Files Instantly. Download ViewPDF Extension Now! OPEN ViewPDF.io State legislative seats that changed party control, 2018 PRIMARY ELECTIONS FEDERAL ELECTIONS STATE ELECTIONS LOCAL ELECTIONS VOTER INFORMATION On November 6, 2018, 6,073 seats were up for election across 87 of the nation's 99 state legislative chambers. As a result of the elections, control of 508 seats was flipped from one party to another. 2018 State Democrats gained a net 308 seats in the 2018 elections, Republicans lost a net 294 seats, and third legislative elections party and independent candidates lost a net 14 seats. At least one flip occurred in every state except Louisiana, Mississippi, New Jersey, and Virginia, which did not hold state legislative elections in 2018. « 2017 2019 » New Hampshire had 77 seats flip, the most of any state. Sixty-seven of those seats flipped from Republicans to Democrats, seven from Democrats to Republicans, two from third party legislators to Republicans, and one from a third party legislator to a Democrat. Maine followed with 26 flips, including 16 Republican seats to Democrats, two Democratic seats to Republicans, three Republican seats to third party candidates, and five third party seats to Democrats. The only other state with more than 20 flips was Pennsylvania, with 19 Republican seats flipping to Democrats and three Democratic seats flipping to Republicans. Six state legislative chambers flipped control in 2018, including both chambers of the New Hampshire General Court, the state senates of Colorado, Maine, and New York, and the Minnesota House of Representatives.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study of the Forces Leading to the Adoption of Prohibition in Utah in 1917
    Brigham Young University BYU ScholarsArchive Theses and Dissertations 1958 A Study of the Forces Leading to the Adoption of Prohibition in Utah in 1917 Bruce T. Dyer Brigham Young University - Provo Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd Part of the Mormon Studies Commons, and the Political History Commons BYU ScholarsArchive Citation Dyer, Bruce T., "A Study of the Forces Leading to the Adoption of Prohibition in Utah in 1917" (1958). Theses and Dissertations. 4658. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd/4658 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. A STUDY OF THE FORCES LEADING TO THE ADOPTION OF PROHIBITION IN UTAH IN 1917 A Thesis Submitted to The Department of Hi3tory of BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE by BRUCE T. DYER ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The writing of this thesis could not have been ac­ complished without the help and encouragement of many people* To name all of them would be an impossible taskj it is, therefore, with a feeling of deep humility that the writer acknowledges the help and inspiration given to him* To his mother he is particularly grateful; only by her long-suffering patience and love did this work come to fruition* Karen Curtis gave the smile and encouragement when the spirits were lowest and a kind word needed the most* To Dr* R* Kent Fielding of the history department of Brigham Young University and chairman of the thesis committee the writer cannot begin to express the appreciation felt* The other committee member, Dr* Stewart L* Grow of the political science department, was always ready with a helping hand when it was needed.
    [Show full text]
  • APPENDIX to JURISDICTIONAL STATEMENT (A-I)
    APPENDIX TO JURISDICTIONAL STATEMENT (A-i) LIST OF PARTIES Eugene Martin LaVergne; Frederick John LaVergne; Leonard P. Marshall; Scott Neuman, and Allen J. Cannon, Plaintiffs, VS. (1) United States House of Representatives, a body politic created and wnstituted by Artici e I of the United States Constitution, as amended,- (2) Individual Members of the United States House of Representatives from the 50 States that have been seated so far at the One Hundred Fifteenth Congress (435 Representatives Apportioned to date out of the minimum of 6,230 Representatives Constitutionally Required to be Apportioned), (3) Honorable Paul Ryan, United States Representative from the State of Wisconsin; (4) Honorable David S. Feniem, Archivist of the United States, (5) Honorable Wilbur Ross, United States Secretary of Commera (6) Honorable Donald J. Th.imp, President of the United States, and (7) Honorable Karen L Haas, Clerk of the United States House of Representatives,-VIRGINIA STATE OFFICIALS: (8) Honorable Terry McAuliffe, Governor of Vuginia,' (9) Honorable Mark Heng, Vuginki State Attorney General (10) Honorable Kelly Thomasson, Secretary of the Commonwealth of Virginia; (ii) Virginia State Senate (40 State Senators); (12) Virginia House of Delegates (100 State Delegates); CONNECT(JCUT STATE OFFICIALS: (13) Honorable Daniel P. Malloy, Governor of Connecticut,' (14) Honorable George Jepsen, Connecticut State Attorney Generat,' (15)Honorable Denise W. Menu, Connecticut Secretary of State,' (16) Connecticut State Senate (36 State Senators); (A-2) (17)
    [Show full text]
  • Utah State Senate
    UTAH STATE SENATE UTAH STATE CAPITOL • COMPLEX 320 STATE CAPITOL P.O. BOX 145115 • SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5515 • (801) 538-1035 AGENDA TO: Members of the Senate Natural Resources, Agriculture, and Environment Standing Committee FROM: Sen. Scott D. Sandall, Chair RE: Electronic Committee Meeting DATE: Tuesday, February 23, 2021 TIME: 4:00 PM ANCHOR 210 Senate Building LOCATION: *This electronic meeting may be held without an anchor location if the committee chair determines that conducting the meeting with an anchor location presents a substantial risk to the health and safety of those who may be present at the anchor location. Whether the meeting is conducted with or without an anchor location, members of the public may participate remotely in the meeting. To participate remotely in the electronic meeting, please visit the committee’s webpage at https://le.utah.gov to access the live streaming options. - Call to order and approval of minutes - The following bills are scheduled for consideration: 1. SB0199 Water Amendments (M. McKell) (po/nwb) 2. SB0039 Hemp Regulation Amendments (D. Hinkins) (mc/agh) 3. SB0040 Petroleum Storage Tanks Amendments (D. Hinkins) (po/nwb) 4. SCR006 Concurrent Resolution Supporting the Removal of Uranium Mill Tailings Near the Colorado River in Moab (D. Hinkins) (po/nwb) 5. HB0236 Waste Tire Recycling Amendments (S. Handy) (po/nwb) 6. HB0185 Laboratory Equipment Amendments (S. Lund) (po/nwb) 7. HB0241 Utah Seeds Amendments (S. Lund) (po/nwb) 8. HB0151S01 State Infrastructure Bank Amendments (B. Brammer) (kpg/ay) COMMITTEE MEMBERS Sen. Scott D. Sandall, Chair Sen. David G. Buxton Sen. Gene Davis Sen.
    [Show full text]
  • USGLC's Utah Advisory Committee
    Utah Advisory Committee These business, faith, military, and community leaders believe that Utah benefits when America leads in the world through investments in development and diplomacy. Lew Cramer* Colliers International – Utah Hon. Jim Matheson President & CEO Co-Chairs U.S. House of Representatives U.S. Department of Commerce Former Assistant Secretary of Commerce for (2001-2015) International Trade Hon. Baktybek Abdrisaev, Ph.D. Hon. José V. Borjón Alan Dayton Utah Valley University Consulate of Mexico in Salt Lake City, Utah Intermountain Healthcare Lecturer Head Consul Senior Counsel Kyrgyz Republic Hon. Curt Bramble* Mircea Divricean Ambassador to the U.S. and Canada (1997 Utah State Senate Kostopulos Dream Foundation – 2005) Member President & CEO Member of the Jogorku Kenesh (Parliament) National Conference of State Legislatures Honorary Consul of Romania to U.S., Utah (1995 – 2000) Former President Hon. Tom Dolan Neil Abercrombie Josh Brown Sandy City Utah State University Rio Tinto Mayor (1993 – 2017) Vice President of Government Relations Director, Government Affairs Wasatch Front Regional Council Stan L. Albrecht Chair Joseph R. Brubaker Utah State University Kirton McConkie Dr. David Doty President Emeritus Shareholder Education & Training, Management & Christopher F. Allred Training Corporation Raymon Burton Weber County Vice President, Education & Training One Refugee Weber County Attorney Executive Director Jennifer H. Ellsworth Scott Anderson Engage Now Africa Hon. Damon Cann, Ph.D. Zions Bank Executive Director North Logan City President & CEO Mayor Charles Evans Leonard Bagalwa Utah State University Charles Evans & Associates Utah Valley Refugees Professor Principal Founder & Executive Director Peter Corroon James Evans* Shadman Bashir Salt Lake County Utah Republican Party Dixie State University Mayor (2004 – 2013) Chairman Emeritus Director of International Student Services Paul J.
    [Show full text]
  • Utah State Senate
    UTAH STATE SENATE UTAH STATE CAPITOL • COMPLEX 320 STATE CAPITOL P.O. BOX 145115 • SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5515 • (801) 538-1035 AGENDA TO: Members of the Senate Natural Resources, Agriculture, and Environment Standing Committee FROM: Sen. Scott D. Sandall, Chair RE: Electronic Committee Meeting DATE: Thursday, February 25, 2021 TIME: 7:30 AM ANCHOR 210 Senate Building LOCATION: *This electronic meeting may be held without an anchor location if the committee chair determines that conducting the meeting with an anchor location presents a substantial risk to the health and safety of those who may be present at the anchor location. Whether the meeting is conducted with or without an anchor location, members of the public may participate remotely in the meeting. To participate remotely in the electronic meeting, please visit the committee’s webpage at https://le.utah.gov to access the live streaming options. - Call to order and approval of minutes - The following bills are scheduled for consideration: 1. HB0297S01 Colorado River Amendments (B. Wilson) (po/nwb) 2. SB0141 Task Force on Food Security (L. Escamilla) (ava/jh2) 3. SCR003 Concurrent Resolution Encouraging the Development of a Multi-state Passenger Rail Commission (L. Escamilla) (kpg/ay) 4. HB0295S02 Wildlife Modifications (C. Snider) (ah3/ls1) 5. HB0296S02 Soil Health Amendments (J. Ferry) (po/nwb) 6. HCR012 Concurrent Resolution Encouraging Cooperative Action Regarding National Monuments (C. Albrecht) (po/nwb) 7. HB0305 Quality Growth Act (J. Ferry) (po/nwb) 8. SB0164 Utah Housing Affordability Amendments (J. Anderegg) (pla/sf1) COMMITTEE MEMBERS Sen. Scott D. Sandall, Chair Sen. David G. Buxton Sen.
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter Draft 3
    PARTICIPATION WINTER 2004 From the Interim Director A New Look! I am honored to be filling in as interim director As you may have already noticed, the Hinckley following Ted Wilson’s retirement. Ted led with Institute of Politics has a new look! We have hired great energy and was a fantastic link between the the University of Utah Marketing and Hinckley Institute of Politics and the community. Communications Department to help us enhance His reputation as an excellent leader is well earned, our appearance. The updated newsletter and logo and we at the Hinckley Institute wish him the best. are just the first phase of this new marketing plan. These are exciting times here at the Hinckley Our new Web site will be highlighted by redesigned Institute of Politics. The nationwide search for a sections describing Hinckley Internships and new director continues to attract interest. We are Hinckley Forums. The hallway outside the hopeful that the position will be filled for next year. Hinckley Institute of Politics will feature an We are also in the preliminary stages of launching a Ron Hrebenar improved wall display as well as an impressive sign new marketing plan. The logo, Web site, and facil- Interim Director, Hinckley welcoming visitors to the Institute. We hope that Institute of Politics ities will all be getting a facelift in the coming these enhancements will attract both students and months. We feel this will increase our visibility on community members and reflect the bright future campus and our identity out in the community. of the Hinckley Institute of Politics.
    [Show full text]