The Summer Coon Volcano, Eastern San Juan Mountains, Colorado Mertzman, Stanley A., Jr, 1971, Pp

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Summer Coon Volcano, Eastern San Juan Mountains, Colorado Mertzman, Stanley A., Jr, 1971, Pp New Mexico Geological Society Downloaded from: http://nmgs.nmt.edu/publications/guidebooks/22 The Summer Coon volcano, eastern San Juan Mountains, Colorado Mertzman, Stanley A., Jr, 1971, pp. 265-272 in: San Luis Basin (Colorado), James, H. L.; [ed.], New Mexico Geological Society 22nd Annual Fall Field Conference Guidebook, 340 p. This is one of many related papers that were included in the 1971 NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebook. Annual NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebooks Every fall since 1950, the New Mexico Geological Society (NMGS) has held an annual Fall Field Conference that explores some region of New Mexico (or surrounding states). Always well attended, these conferences provide a guidebook to participants. Besides detailed road logs, the guidebooks contain many well written, edited, and peer-reviewed geoscience papers. These books have set the national standard for geologic guidebooks and are an essential geologic reference for anyone working in or around New Mexico. Free Downloads NMGS has decided to make peer-reviewed papers from our Fall Field Conference guidebooks available for free download. Non-members will have access to guidebook papers two years after publication. Members have access to all papers. This is in keeping with our mission of promoting interest, research, and cooperation regarding geology in New Mexico. However, guidebook sales represent a significant proportion of our operating budget. Therefore, only research papers are available for download. Road logs, mini-papers, maps, stratigraphic charts, and other selected content are available only in the printed guidebooks. Copyright Information Publications of the New Mexico Geological Society, printed and electronic, are protected by the copyright laws of the United States. No material from the NMGS website, or printed and electronic publications, may be reprinted or redistributed without NMGS permission. Contact us for permission to reprint portions of any of our publications. One printed copy of any materials from the NMGS website or our print and electronic publications may be made for individual use without our permission. Teachers and students may make unlimited copies for educational use. Any other use of these materials requires explicit permission. This page is intentionally left blank to maintain order of facing pages. 265 THE SUMMER COON VOLCANO, EASTERN SAN JUAN MOUNTAINS, COLORADO by STANLEY A. MERTZMAN, JR. Case-Western Reserve University Cleveland, Ohio FIGURE 1. Central core area of Summer Coon volcano. INTRODUCTION underlie approximately seventy square miles, which include parts of four 1:24000 quadrangles (Twin Mountains, Twin The San Juan volcanic field extends over approximately Mountains S.E., Indian Head, and Del Norte). Pre- 5,000 square miles in the southwestern part of Colorado. vious work in the area involves only two field-based The stratigraphic section, which is applicable to the cen- studies; a fast reconnaissance visit to the area by Larsen tral and eastern segments of the volcanic field, is listed in and Cross (1956) and a detailed reconnaissance project Table 1. The pioneering work in this area was performed by Lipman (1968 ), which involved outlining the basic by E. S. Larsen, Jr. and Whitman Cross, spanning nearly field relationships of the complex, examination of thin forty years and culminated in U.S. Geological Survey sections and several chemical analyses. Subsequently Doe Professional Paper 258, which summarized the geology et al. (1969) published lead and strontium isotope data and petrology of the entire region. Since 1960 an extensive for three samples from the Summer Coon area and Lip- program of field mapping has been carried on by the Den- man et al. (1970) reported three potassium-argon age ver Branch of the U.S. Geological Survey. The data pub- dates. lished by the various coworkers of this program, including R. G. Dickinson, W. R. Hansen, P. W. Lipman, R. G. Luedke, J. C. Olsen, J. C. Ratte, and T. A. Steven, are SUMMER COONS RELATIONSHIP listed in the bibliography. TO REGIONAL GEOLOGY The specific area of interest is called the Summer Coon In a general manner the geologic map of the Summer volcano. The intrusive rocks that appear to mark the cen- Coon area (see plate 1, back pocket) shows two relation- tral conduit of the volcano are located 61/2 miles north of ships which are important to the interpretation of the over- Del Norte, Colorado (fig. 1). Rocks related to the volcano all geologic development of the eastern San Juan volcanic Presently Division of Volcanology, Smithsonian Institute, Wash- field. The first is the nearly perfect pattern of radial dikes ington, D.C. about the central intrusive area. No transverse or ring dike 266 NEW MEXICO GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY—TWENTY-SECOND FIELD CONFERENCE TABLE 1. FIELD GEOLOGY GENERALIZED VOLCANIC STRATIGRAPHY OF THE GENERAL AND EASTERN PARTS OF THE The initial development of the Summer Coon volcano SAN JUAN MOUNTAINS COLORADO was upon a terrain of older volcanic rocks of rhyodacitic (with mean ages of dated units). composition. A window of these rocks outcrops just north (Modified from Lipman et al., 1970) of La Garita Creek along the boundary between NE1/4 Late Basalts and Rhyolites Sec 6, T41N, R6E, and NW 1/4 Sec 5, T41N, R6E (see Servilleta Formation of Montgomery, 1953 (3.6 to 4.5 m.y.) Hins- Plate 1, hack pocket). A rock from this outcrop has been dale Formation dated at 34.0 ± 1.5 m.y. by Lipman et al. (1970), which Basalt (4.7 to 23.4 m.y.) provides a maximum age for the complex. Rhyolite (4.8 to 22.4 m.y.) The Summer Coon volcanics are part of the Conejos Lavas and Related Rocks Erupted Concurrently with Formation as outlined in Table 1. This correlation is the Ash-flow Tuffs based on the potassium-argon dates reported in Lipman Local andesitic-quartz latitic flows and breccias that intertongue et al. (1970). The stratigraphic nomenclature that will be with the ash-flow sequence in and near the central San Juan com- used in this paper is outlined in Table 2. This sequence plex. The Fisher Quartz Latite (26.4 m.y.) overlie the entire ash- flow sequence. TABLE 2. Ash-flow Tuffs VOLCANIC STRATIGRAPHY OF THE Snowshoe Mountain Quartz Latite (greater than 26.4 m.y.) SUMMER COON SHIELD SEQUENCE, COLORADO Rat Creek and Nelson Mountain Quartz Latite Wason Park Rhyolite `(.3 Late Upper Andesite Member Mammoth Mountain Rhyolite (26.7 m.y.) Intermediate Carpenter Ride Tuff-Bachelor Mountain Rhyolitc –o" Unit Lower Pyroclastic Member Fish Canyon Tuff-La Garita Quartz Latite (27.8 m.y.) 0 0 Tuff of Masonic Park (28.2 m.y.) LT-, Middle Upper Rhyolite Member Treasure Mountain Rhyolite (29.8 m.y.) C5 O Silicic cl.) Early Intermediate Lavas and Breccias 0o Unit Lower Rhyodacite Member Conejos Formation (31.1 to 34.7 m.y.) 0 Early Mafic Unit pattern has been discovered, nor any indication that a graben type structure was ever developed in the core area. is based solely upon field geologic relationships since no These characteristics, by analogy with a scale model study radiometric dating was performed. of salt dome intrusion by Parker and McDowell (1951) Rocks derived from the Summer Coon volcano can be indicate that only the mildest doming took place during divided into two distinct groups: a shield sequence of the Summer Coon intrusive and extrusive activities. In flows, breccias, and dikes, which can be further subdivided addition, the regional stress regime must have been iso- into three units and a central intrusive complex which tropic or only mildly anistropic, otherwise one would ex- includes some intra-caldera lava flows. Each of the three pect the dike pattern to become more complex, as it did units of the shield sequence consists of varying proportions at Spanish Peaks where the regional stress system was at of breccias, flows and dikes. The lower part of this shield least moderatly anistropic. sequence is overlain by younger lava flows and breccias of The second important relationship is the asymmetrical the Conejos Formation to the northwest, by younger ash- distribution of dips about a north-northeast line through flow tuffs to the north and east, by volcaniclastic sediments the center of the complex. To the cast and southeast of the to the south (some of which is probably detritus eroded core area dips range from 25° to 35°; on the north and from Summer Coon itself ), and is intruded and hydro- west sides the dip vary between 5° and 15°. This demon- thermally altered by rhyolite plugs and vents to the east. strates that the Summer Coon area has been tilted east- southeastward toward the San Luis Valley. This regional EARLY MAFIC UNIT warping must have occurred after the cessation of volcanic The Early Mafic Unit is 2800-3100 feet thick, of which activity because the original dip of the flows and breccias 85-90% consists of weakly stratified breccia occurring in around the caldera was probably essentially symmetrical. beds 5 to 75 feet thick and having essentially uniform Moreover, if the volcano did form during the tilting appearance throughout the entire sequence. In general the process, the dike pattern probably would have reflected an breccia is composed of angular blocks 10 to 15 inches anisotropic stress condition. across which contain few if any vesicles. A matrix of coarse These facts demonstrate that the initial development of tuff (Williams and McBirney, 1969) is usually present, the Rio Grande depression could not have taken place although occasionally the intervening space between blocks prior to the extinction of the Summer Coon volcano (Lip- is empty. The tuff contains the same minerals as those man, 1968). Lipman and Mehnert (1969) have shown constituting the breccia blocks, as determined by oil im- from other evidence that subsidence of the Rio Grande de- mersion methods.
Recommended publications
  • Geologic Map of the Central San Juan Caldera Cluster, Southwestern Colorado by Peter W
    Geologic Map of the Central San Juan Caldera Cluster, Southwestern Colorado By Peter W. Lipman Pamphlet to accompany Geologic Investigations Series I–2799 dacite Ceobolla Creek Tuff Nelson Mountain Tuff, rhyolite Rat Creek Tuff, dacite Cebolla Creek Tuff Rat Creek Tuff, rhyolite Wheeler Geologic Monument (Half Moon Pass quadrangle) provides exceptional exposures of three outflow tuff sheets erupted from the San Luis caldera complex. Lowest sheet is Rat Creek Tuff, which is nonwelded throughout but grades upward from light-tan rhyolite (~74% SiO2) into pale brown dacite (~66% SiO2) that contains sparse dark-brown andesitic scoria. Distinctive hornblende-rich middle Cebolla Creek Tuff contains basal surge beds, overlain by vitrophyre of uniform mafic dacite that becomes less welded upward. Uppermost Nelson Mountain Tuff consists of nonwelded to weakly welded, crystal-poor rhyolite, which grades upward to a densely welded caprock of crystal-rich dacite (~68% SiO2). White arrows show contacts between outflow units. 2006 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey CONTENTS Geologic setting . 1 Volcanism . 1 Structure . 2 Methods of study . 3 Description of map units . 4 Surficial deposits . 4 Glacial deposits . 4 Postcaldera volcanic rocks . 4 Hinsdale Formation . 4 Los Pinos Formation . 5 Oligocene volcanic rocks . 5 Rocks of the Creede Caldera cycle . 5 Creede Formation . 5 Fisher Dacite . 5 Snowshoe Mountain Tuff . 6 Rocks of the San Luis caldera complex . 7 Rocks of the Nelson Mountain caldera cycle . 7 Rocks of the Cebolla Creek caldera cycle . 9 Rocks of the Rat Creek caldera cycle . 10 Lava flows premonitory(?) to San Luis caldera complex . .11 Rocks of the South River caldera cycle .
    [Show full text]
  • (2000), Voluminous Lava-Like Precursor to a Major Ash-Flow
    Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research 98 (2000) 153–171 www.elsevier.nl/locate/jvolgeores Voluminous lava-like precursor to a major ash-flow tuff: low-column pyroclastic eruption of the Pagosa Peak Dacite, San Juan volcanic field, Colorado O. Bachmanna,*, M.A. Dungana, P.W. Lipmanb aSection des Sciences de la Terre de l’Universite´ de Gene`ve, 13, Rue des Maraıˆchers, 1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland bUS Geological Survey, 345 Middlefield Rd, Menlo Park, CA, USA Received 26 May 1999; received in revised form 8 November 1999; accepted 8 November 1999 Abstract The Pagosa Peak Dacite is an unusual pyroclastic deposit that immediately predated eruption of the enormous Fish Canyon Tuff (ϳ5000 km3) from the La Garita caldera at 28 Ma. The Pagosa Peak Dacite is thick (to 1 km), voluminous (Ͼ200 km3), and has a high aspect ratio (1:50) similar to those of silicic lava flows. It contains a high proportion (40–60%) of juvenile clasts (to 3–4 m) emplaced as viscous magma that was less vesiculated than typical pumice. Accidental lithic fragments are absent above the basal 5–10% of the unit. Thick densely welded proximal deposits flowed rheomorphically due to gravitational spreading, despite the very high viscosity of the crystal-rich magma, resulting in a macroscopic appearance similar to flow- layered silicic lava. Although it is a separate depositional unit, the Pagosa Peak Dacite is indistinguishable from the overlying Fish Canyon Tuff in bulk-rock chemistry, phenocryst compositions, and 40Ar/39Ar age. The unusual characteristics of this deposit are interpreted as consequences of eruption by low-column pyroclastic fountaining and lateral transport as dense, poorly inflated pyroclastic flows.
    [Show full text]
  • Polyphase Laramide Tectonism and Sedimentation in the San Juan Basin, New Mexico Steven M
    New Mexico Geological Society Downloaded from: http://nmgs.nmt.edu/publications/guidebooks/54 Polyphase Laramide tectonism and sedimentation in the San Juan Basin, New Mexico Steven M. Cather, 2003, pp. 119-132 in: Geology of the Zuni Plateau, Lucas, Spencer G.; Semken, Steven C.; Berglof, William; Ulmer-Scholle, Dana; [eds.], New Mexico Geological Society 54th Annual Fall Field Conference Guidebook, 425 p. This is one of many related papers that were included in the 2003 NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebook. Annual NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebooks Every fall since 1950, the New Mexico Geological Society (NMGS) has held an annual Fall Field Conference that explores some region of New Mexico (or surrounding states). Always well attended, these conferences provide a guidebook to participants. Besides detailed road logs, the guidebooks contain many well written, edited, and peer-reviewed geoscience papers. These books have set the national standard for geologic guidebooks and are an essential geologic reference for anyone working in or around New Mexico. Free Downloads NMGS has decided to make peer-reviewed papers from our Fall Field Conference guidebooks available for free download. Non-members will have access to guidebook papers two years after publication. Members have access to all papers. This is in keeping with our mission of promoting interest, research, and cooperation regarding geology in New Mexico. However, guidebook sales represent a significant proportion of our operating budget. Therefore, only research papers are available for download. Road logs, mini-papers, maps, stratigraphic charts, and other selected content are available only in the printed guidebooks. Copyright Information Publications of the New Mexico Geological Society, printed and electronic, are protected by the copyright laws of the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Rulemaking for Colorado Roadless Areas Map 2
    MAP 2 Inventoried Roadless Areas MAP 2 IRA acres 114 Porphyry Peak 3,400 233 Treasure Mountain 20,900 194 115 Puma 8,500 234 Turkey Creek 22,300 193 Platte River Inventoried Roadless Area rounded 116 Purgatoire 13,200 235 West Needle 2,500 Wilderness Names to nearest 207 117 Rampart West 23,700 236 West Needle Wilderness 5,900 4 100 acres ** Map Key ** 24 118 Romley 6,900 237 Williams Creek White Fir Natural Area 500 209 Arapaho-Roosevelt National Forest 119 Sangre de Cristo 32,600 White River National Forest 187 204 193 Mount 1 Bard Creek 25,400 120 Scraggy Peaks 8,200 238 Adam Mountain 8,200 195 197 21 Major Roads Zirkel 2 Byers Peak 10,100 121 Sheep Rock 2,200 239 Ashcroft 900 Wilderness 210 205 24 76 208 Rawah 10 25 3 Cache La Poudre Adjacent Areas 3,200 122 Silverheels 6,600 240 Assignation Ridge 13,300 Wilderness 9 11 4 Cherokee Park 7,800 123 Spanish Peaks 5,700 241 Baldy Mountain 6,000 Inventoried Roadless Areas 5 3 5 Comanche Peak Adjacent Areas 46,000 124 Spanish Peaks- proposed 1,300 242 Basalt Mountain A 14,000 196 5 3 3 5 5 Cache La Poudre 6 Copper Mountain 13,500 125 Square Top Mountain 5,900 243 Basalt Mountain B 7,400 5 3 3 3 214 Wilderness 7 Crosier Mountain 7,200 126 St. Charles Peak 11,600 244 Berry Creek 8,600 National Forest System Wilderness & Comanche Peak 28 200 24 8 Gold Run 6,500 245 Big Ridge To South Fork A 35,300 191 Wilderness 127 Starvation Creek 8,200 19 5 9 Green Ridge - East 26,700 128 Tanner Peak 17,800 246 Big Ridge To South Fork B 6,000 Other Congressionally Designated Lands 24 Fort 19 5 10 Green Ridge
    [Show full text]
  • Spanish Peaks Wilderness
    Mt. Bierstadt Field Trip Trip date: 6/17/2006 Ralph Swain, USFS R2 Wilderness Program Manager Observations: 1). The parking lot was nearly full (approximately 35 + vehicles) at 8:00 am on a Saturday morning. I observed better-than-average compliance with the dog on leash regulation. Perhaps this was due to my Forest Service truck being at the entrance to the parking lot and the two green Forest Service trucks (Dan and Tom) in the lot! 2). District Ranger Dan Lovato informed us of the District’s intent to only allow 40 vehicles in the lower parking lot. Additional vehicles will have to drive to the upper parking lot. This was new information for me and I’m currently checking in with Steve Priest of the South Platte Ranger District to learn more about the parking situation at Mt. Bierstadt. 3). I observed users of all types and abilities hiking the 14er. Some runners, 14 parties with dogs (of which 10 were in compliance with the dog-leash regulation), and a new- born baby being carried to the top by mom and dad (that’s a first for me)! Management Issues: 1). Capacity issue: I counted 107 people on the hike, including our group of 14 people. The main issue for Mt. Bierstadt, being a 14er hike in a congressionally designated wilderness, is a social issue of how many people are appropriate? Thinking back to Dr. Cordell’s opening Forum discuss on demographic trends and the growth coming to the west, including front-range Denver, the use on Mt.
    [Show full text]
  • Geochronology Database for Central Colorado
    Geochronology Database for Central Colorado Data Series 489 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Geochronology Database for Central Colorado By T.L. Klein, K.V. Evans, and E.H. DeWitt Data Series 489 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2010 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1-888-ASK-USGS For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: T.L. Klein, K.V. Evans, and E.H. DeWitt, 2009, Geochronology database for central Colorado: U.S. Geological Survey Data Series 489, 13 p. iii Contents Abstract ...........................................................................................................................................................1 Introduction.....................................................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter W-9 - Wildlife Properties
    07/15/2021 CHAPTER W-9 - WILDLIFE PROPERTIES Index Page ARTICLE I GENERAL PROVISIONS #900 REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO ALL WILDLIFE 1 PROPERTIES, EXCEPT STATE TRUST LANDS ARTICLE II PROPERTY SPECIFIC PROVISIONS #901 PROPERTY SPECIFIC REGULATIONS 8 ARTICLE III STATE TRUST LANDS #902 REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO ALL STATE TRUST LANDS 53 LEASED BY COLORADO PARKS AND WILDLIFE #903 PROPERTY SPECIFIC REGULATIONS 55 ARTICLE IV STATE FISH UNITS #904 REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO ALL STATE FISH UNITS 71 #905 PROPERTY SPECIFIC REGULATIONS 72 ARTICLE V BOATING RESTRICTIONS APPLICABLE TO ALL DIVISION CONTROLLED PROPERTIES, INCLUDING STATE TRUST LANDS LEASED BY COLORADO PARKS AND WILDLIFE #906 AQUATIC NUISANCE SPECIES (ANS) 72 APPENDIX A 74 APPENDIX B 75 Basis and Purpose 81 Statement CHAPTER W-9 - WILDLIFE PROPERTIES ARTICLE I - GENERAL PROVISIONS #900 - REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO ALL WILDLIFE PROPERTIES, EXCEPT STATE TRUST LANDS A. DEFINITIONS 1. “Aircraft” means any machine or device capable of atmospheric flight, including, but not limited to, airplanes, helicopters, gliders, dirigibles, balloons, rockets, hang gliders and parachutes, and any models thereof. 2. "Water contact activities" means swimming, wading (except for the purpose of fishing), waterskiing, sail surfboarding, scuba diving, and other water-related activities which put a person in contact with the water (without regard to the clothing or equipment worn). 3. “Youth mentor hunting” means hunting by youths under 18 years of age. Youth hunters under 16 years of age shall at all times be accompanied by a mentor when hunting on youth mentor properties. A mentor must be 18 years of age or older and hold a valid hunter education certificate or be born before January 1, 1949.
    [Show full text]
  • Wilderness Study Areas
    I ___- .-ll..l .“..l..““l.--..- I. _.^.___” _^.__.._._ - ._____.-.-.. ------ FEDERAL LAND M.ANAGEMENT Status and Uses of Wilderness Study Areas I 150156 RESTRICTED--Not to be released outside the General Accounting Wice unless specifically approved by the Office of Congressional Relations. ssBO4’8 RELEASED ---- ---. - (;Ao/li:( ‘I:I)-!L~-l~~lL - United States General Accounting OfTice GAO Washington, D.C. 20548 Resources, Community, and Economic Development Division B-262989 September 23,1993 The Honorable Bruce F. Vento Chairman, Subcommittee on National Parks, Forests, and Public Lands Committee on Natural Resources House of Representatives Dear Mr. Chairman: Concerned about alleged degradation of areas being considered for possible inclusion in the National Wilderness Preservation System (wilderness study areas), you requested that we provide you with information on the types and effects of activities in these study areas. As agreed with your office, we gathered information on areas managed by two agencies: the Department of the Interior’s Bureau of Land Management (BLN) and the Department of Agriculture’s Forest Service. Specifically, this report provides information on (1) legislative guidance and the agency policies governing wilderness study area management, (2) the various activities and uses occurring in the agencies’ study areas, (3) the ways these activities and uses affect the areas, and (4) agency actions to monitor and restrict these uses and to repair damage resulting from them. Appendixes I and II provide data on the number, acreage, and locations of wilderness study areas managed by BLM and the Forest Service, as well as data on the types of uses occurring in the areas.
    [Show full text]
  • 36 CFR Ch. II (7–1–13 Edition) § 294.49
    § 294.49 36 CFR Ch. II (7–1–13 Edition) subpart shall prohibit a responsible of- Line Includes ficial from further restricting activi- Colorado roadless area name upper tier No. acres ties allowed within Colorado Roadless Areas. This subpart does not compel 22 North St. Vrain ............................................ X the amendment or revision of any land 23 Rawah Adjacent Areas ............................... X 24 Square Top Mountain ................................. X management plan. 25 Troublesome ............................................... X (d) The prohibitions and restrictions 26 Vasquez Adjacent Area .............................. X established in this subpart are not sub- 27 White Pine Mountain. ject to reconsideration, revision, or re- 28 Williams Fork.............................................. X scission in subsequent project decisions Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre, Gunnison National Forest or land management plan amendments 29 Agate Creek. or revisions undertaken pursuant to 36 30 American Flag Mountain. CFR part 219. 31 Baldy. (e) Nothing in this subpart waives 32 Battlements. any applicable requirements regarding 33 Beaver ........................................................ X 34 Beckwiths. site specific environmental analysis, 35 Calamity Basin. public involvement, consultation with 36 Cannibal Plateau. Tribes and other agencies, or compli- 37 Canyon Creek-Antero. 38 Canyon Creek. ance with applicable laws. 39 Carson ........................................................ X (f) If any provision in this subpart
    [Show full text]
  • Profiles of Colorado Roadless Areas
    PROFILES OF COLORADO ROADLESS AREAS Prepared by the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region July 23, 2008 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 2 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS ARAPAHO-ROOSEVELT NATIONAL FOREST ......................................................................................................10 Bard Creek (23,000 acres) .......................................................................................................................................10 Byers Peak (10,200 acres)........................................................................................................................................12 Cache la Poudre Adjacent Area (3,200 acres)..........................................................................................................13 Cherokee Park (7,600 acres) ....................................................................................................................................14 Comanche Peak Adjacent Areas A - H (45,200 acres).............................................................................................15 Copper Mountain (13,500 acres) .............................................................................................................................19 Crosier Mountain (7,200 acres) ...............................................................................................................................20 Gold Run (6,600 acres) ............................................................................................................................................21
    [Show full text]
  • Table 12B-01. Mountainous Volcanic Region Stratigraphic Chart
    Mountainous Volcanic Region Hydrogeologic Period Phase Stratigraphic Unit Unit Alluvium associated with present Modern Alluvial Aquifer rivers Quaternary Glaciation Glacial deposits Glacial deposits Volcanics/ Basalt of bimodal suite Crystalline bedrock Crystalline Granitic rocks of bimodal suite Neogene bedrock Extension Inter-volcanic sedimentary deposits Local aquifers Ash-flow tuffs Transition Volcanics Paleogene Pre-ash flow volcanics Laramide aged formations in Laramide extensions of adjoining Laramide Basins may be found in small structural blocks Regional Cretaceous Seaway shale- Cretaceous Interior dominated formations form multiple Seaway hydrogeologic units, most are confining units Jurassic Mesozoic No strata recognized in this area Triassic Sandstones Local aquifers Permian Ancestral Rocky Mountains event Ancestral marine and non-marine sedimentary Rocky formations form multiple Pennsylvanian Mountains hydrogeologic units Mississippian Devonian Older Paleozoic sedimentary Paleozoic formations preserved in the Ancestral Silurian Carbonates Rocky Mountains event Eagle Basin- Ordovician Central Colorado Trough Cambrian Undifferentiated Fault zone Coarse-grained intrusive rocks Crystalline Precambrian Precambrian bedrock aquifer Intrusive rocks Metamorphic rocks Table 12b-01. Mountainous volcanic region stratigraphic chart. Mountainous Volcanic Region Unit Thickness Hydrogeologic Period Phase Stratigraphic Unit Physical Characteristics Hydrologic Characteristics (ft) Unit Modern Alluvium associated with present rivers Alluvial
    [Show full text]
  • Geophysical Study of the San Juan Mountains Batholith Complex, Southwestern Colorado
    Geophysical study of the San Juan Mountains batholith complex, southwestern Colorado Benjamin J. Drenth1,*, G. Randy Keller1, and Ren A. Thompson2 1ConocoPhillips School of Geology and Geophysics, 100 E. Boyd Street, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma 73019, USA 2U.S. Geological Survey, MS 980, Federal Center, Denver, Colorado 80225, USA ABSTRACT contrast of the complex. Models show that coincident with the San Juan Mountains (Fig. 3). the thickness of the batholith complex var- This anomaly has been interpreted as the mani- One of the largest and most pronounced ies laterally to a signifi cant degree, with the festation of a low-density, upper crustal granitic gravity lows over North America is over the greatest thickness (~20 km) under the west- batholith complex that represents the plutonic rugged San Juan Mountains of southwest- ern SJVF, and lesser thicknesses (<10 km) roots of the SJVF (Plouff and Pakiser , 1972). ern Colorado (USA). The mountain range is under the eastern SJVF. The largest group of Whereas this interpretation remains essentially coincident with the San Juan volcanic fi eld nested calderas on the surface of the SJVF, unchallenged, new gravity data processing tech- (SJVF), the largest erosional remnant of a the central caldera cluster, is not correlated niques, digital elevation data, and constraints widespread mid-Cenozoic volcanic fi eld that with the thickest part of the batholith com- from seismic refraction studies (Prodehl and spanned much of the southern Rocky Moun- plex. This result is consistent with petrologic Pakiser , 1980) enable reassessment and improve- tains. A buried, low-density silicic batholith interpretations from recent studies that the ment of the previous model.
    [Show full text]