DOCSLIB.ORG

Virtualization of the RIOT Operating System

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Virtualization of the RIOT Operating System Computer Systems and Telematics — Distributed, Embedded Systems Diploma Thesis Virtualization of the RIOT Operating System Ludwig Ortmann Matr. 3914103 Supervisor: Dr. Emmanuel Baccelli Assisting Supervisor: Prof. Dr.-Ing. Jochen Schiller Institute of Computer Science, Freie Universität Berlin, Germany March 2, 2015 iii I hereby declare to have written this thesis on my own. I have used no other literature and resources than the ones referenced. All text passages that are literal or logical copies from other publications have been marked accordingly. All figures and pictures have been created by me or their sources are referenced accordingly. This thesis has not been submitted in the same or a similar version to any other examination board. Berlin, March 2, 2015 (Ludwig Ortmann) Abstract Abstract Software developers in the growing field of the Internet of Things face many hurdles which arise from the limitations of embedded systems and wireless networking. The employment of hardware and network virtualization promises to allow developers to test and debug hard- ware independent code without being affected by these limitations. This thesis presents RIOT native, a hardware and network emulation implementation for the RIOT operating system, which enables developers to compile and run RIOT as a process in their host operat- ing system. Running the operating system as a process allows for the use of debugging tools and techniques only available on desktop computers otherwise, the integration of common network analysis tools, and the emulation of arbitrary network topologies. By enabling the use of these tools and techniques for the development of software for distributed embedded systems, the hurdles they impose on the development process are significantly reduced. Contents List of Figures xi List of Tables xiii Listings xv Acronyms xvii 1. Introduction 1 1.1. Motivation . .1 1.1.1. The Rise of Embedded Systems . .1 1.1.2. The Complementary Worlds of Traditional and Embedded Systems .1 1.1.3. The Internet of Things . .2 1.1.4. The Caveats of Software Development for the Internet of Things (IoT)2 1.1.5. The Future of Embedded Software Development . .3 1.1.6. The Need for Open Source Software . .4 1.1.7. The Problem at Hand . .4 1.1.8. Compatibility of Software for Embedded with Desktop Systems . .5 1.1.9. Facilitating the Problems of Software Development for Embedded Sys- tems . .5 1.1.10. The Software Environment . .6 1.2. Terminology . .7 1.3. Goals for this Thesis . .8 1.4. Contribution . .8 1.4.1. The Emulator Platform . .8 1.4.2. A Development Methodology for the IoT . .9 1.4.3. Improving the Development Process . .9 1.4.4. Virtual Networking Support . .9 1.4.5. In-Process Preemptive Threading . .9 2. Background and Related Work 11 2.1. The Open Source Project . 11 2.1.1. Community . 11 2.1.2. Project Goals . 12 2.1.3. Development Process . 12 2.1.4. Implications . 13 viii Contents 2.2. Software Quality . 13 2.2.1. Quality Characteristics . 13 2.2.2. Functionality . 14 2.2.3. Reliability . 14 2.2.4. Efficiency . 15 2.2.5. Maintainability . 15 2.2.6. Assuring Software Quality . 15 2.3. Development Tools for Quality Assurance . 15 2.3.1. Constructive . 16 2.3.2. Conclusion . 16 2.4. Analytical Software Development Tools . 16 2.4.1. Functionality . 16 2.4.2. Reliability . 17 2.4.3. Efficiency . 17 2.4.4. Maintainability . 18 2.4.5. Methods and Tools . 18 2.4.6. Preliminary Conclusion . 19 2.5. Tools for IoT Analysis . 19 2.5.1. Model Checking . 19 2.5.2. Static Analysis . 19 2.5.3. Dynamic Analysis . 20 2.5.4. Conclusion . 22 2.6. Tools for Desktop Systems . 23 2.6.1. GDB – Debugger . 23 2.6.2. Valgrind memcheck – Memory Debugger . 23 2.6.3. gprof and Valgrind – Memory and Performance Profiling . 23 2.6.4. Structured Automated Tests . 24 2.6.5. Wireshark - Network Analyzer . 24 2.6.6. Conclusion . 24 2.7. System Virtualization . 24 2.7.1. System Abstraction Levels . 25 2.7.2. Emulation versus Simulation . 27 2.7.3. Conclusion . 27 2.8. Network Virtualization . 28 2.8.1. Network Simulation versus Emulation . 28 2.8.2. TAP Networking . 29 2.9. Productivity . 29 2.9.1. Waiting Destroys Productivity . 29 2.9.2. Test-Driven Development . 30 2.9.3. Conclusion . 30 2.10. The native Platform . 31 2.10.1. Related Work . 31 3. Design and Implementation of the native Platform 33 3.1. Overview . 33 3.2. Threads . 35 3.2.1. The Thread Concept . 35 Contents ix 3.2.2. Threads in RIOT . 35 3.2.3. POSIX ucontext API . 36 3.2.4. Threads in Native ............................ 36 3.2.5. Alternatives to ucontext ......................... 37 3.3. Interrupts . 37 3.3.1. Interrupt Concepts . 37 3.3.2. POSIX Signals . 37 3.3.3. Native Interrupts . 38 3.4. Hardware Timers . 41 3.4.1. Timers in RIOT ............................. 41 3.4.2. Timers in Native ............................. 41 3.5. Virtual Networking . 41 3.5.1. TAP Networking . 42 3.5.2. TAP networking in native . 42 3.5.3. Nativenet Implementation . 43 3.5.4. Configurability . 43 3.6. Traffic Analysis Support . 44 3.7. Virtual Testbed Support . 44 3.7.1. DES-Virt ................................. 45 3.8. UART . 45 3.8.1. UARTs in RIOT ............................. 45 3.8.2. stdio in C and POSIX . 46 3.8.3. uart0 in Native .............................. 47 3.9. RTC . 47 3.9.1. realtime clock (RTC) in Native ..................... 48 3.10. GPIO . 48 3.10.1. RIOT GPIO API . 48 3.10.2. Linux sysfs GPIO . 48 3.10.3. GPIOin Native .............................. 49 3.11. Valgrind memcheck . 49 3.12. Stack Smashing Protection . 50 3.13. Profiling . 51 3.13.1. gprof . 51 3.13.2. cachegrind ................................. 52 3.14. Ramifications of Using Native Libraries . 52 3.14.1. Host Transparency . 54 3.14.2. OS X . 54 4. Evaluation of Functionality, Performance and Impact of the native Platform 57 4.1. Functional Analysis . 57 4.1.1. Virtualization . 57 4.1.2. Network Virtualization . 58 4.2. Support for Development Tools . 58 4.2.1. Coverage . ..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Wireshark User's Guide
    Wireshark User’s Guide For Wireshark 2.1 Ulf Lamping <ulf.lamping[AT]web.de> Richard Sharpe, NS Computer Software and Services P/L <rsharpe[AT]ns.aus.com> Ed Warnicke <hagbard[AT]physics.rutgers.edu> Wireshark User’s Guide: For Wireshark 2.1 by Ulf Lamping, Richard Sharpe, and Ed Warnicke Copyright © 2004-2014 Ulf Lamping, Richard Sharpe, Ed Warnicke Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU General Public License, Version 2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation. All logos and trademarks in this document are property of their respective owner. Preface ...................................................................................................................... viii 1. Foreword ....................................................................................................... viii 2. Who should read this document? ....................................................................... viii 3. Acknowledgements .......................................................................................... viii 4. About this document ......................................................................................... ix 5. Where to get the latest copy of this document? ....................................................... ix 6. Providing feedback about this document ............................................................... ix 1. Introduction .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Hands-On Network Forensics, FIRST 2015
    2015-04-30 WWW.FORSVARSMAKTEN.SE Hands-on Network Forensics Workshop Preparations: 1. Unzip the virtual machine from NetworkForensics_ VirtualBox.zip on your EXTENSIVE USE OF USB thumb drive to your local hard drive COMMAND LINE 2. Start VirtualBox and run the Security Onion VM IN THIS WORKSHOP 3. Log in with: user/password 1 FM CERT 2015-04-30 WWW.FORSVARSMAKTEN.SE Hands-on Network Forensics Erik Hjelmvik, Swedish Armed Forces CERT FIRST 2015, Berlin 2 FM CERT 2015-04-30 WWW.FORSVARSMAKTEN.SE Hands-on Network Forensics Workshop Preparations: 1. Unzip the virtual machine from NetworkForensics_ VirtualBox.zip on your EXTENSIVE USE OF USB thumb drive to your local hard drive COMMAND LINE 2. Start VirtualBox and run the Security Onion VM IN THIS WORKSHOP 3. Log in with: user/password 3 FM CERT 2015-04-30 WWW.FORSVARSMAKTEN.SE ”Password” Ned 4 FM CERT 2015-04-30 WWW.FORSVARSMAKTEN.SE SysAdmin: Homer 5 FM CERT 2015-04-30 WWW.FORSVARSMAKTEN.SE PR /Marketing: Krusty the Clown 6 FM CERT 2015-04-30 WWW.FORSVARSMAKTEN.SE Password Ned AB = pwned.se 7 FM CERT 2015-04-30 WWW.FORSVARSMAKTEN.SE pwned.se Network [INTERNET] | Default Gateway 192.168.0.1 PASSWORD-NED-XP www.pwned.se | 192.168.0.53 192.168.0.2 [TAP]--->Security- | | | Onion -----+------+---------+---------+----------------+------- | | Homer-xubuntu Krustys-PC 192.168.0.51 192.168.0.54 8 FM CERT 2015-04-30 WWW.FORSVARSMAKTEN.SE Security Onion 9 FM CERT 2015-04-30 WWW.FORSVARSMAKTEN.SE Paths (also on Cheat Sheet) • PCAP files: /nsm/sensor_data/securityonion_eth1/dailylogs/ • Argus files:
    [Show full text]
  • Network Intell: Enabling the Non-Expert Analysis of Large Volumes of Intercepted Network Traffic
    Chapter 1 NETWORK INTELL: ENABLING THE NON- EXPERT ANALYSIS OF LARGE VOLUMES OF INTERCEPTED NETWORK TRAFFIC Erwin van de Wiel, Mark Scanlon and Nhien-An Le-Khac Abstract In criminal investigations, telecommunication wiretaps have become a common technique used by law enforcement. While phone-based wire- tapping is well documented and the procedure for their execution are well known, the same cannot be said for Internet taps. Lawfully inter- cepted network traffic often contains a lot of encrypted traffic making it increasingly difficult to find useful information inside the traffic cap- tured. The advent of Internet-of-Things further complicates the pro- cess for non-technical investigators. The current level of complexity of intercepted network traffic is close to a point where data cannot be analysed without supervision of a digital investigator with advanced network knowledge. Current investigations focus on analysing all traffic in a chronological manner and are predominately conducted on the data contents of the intercepted traffic. This approach often becomes overly arduous when the amount of data to be analysed becomes very large. In this paper, we propose a novel approach to analyse large amounts of intercepted network traffic based on network metadata. Our approach significantly reduces the duration of the analysis and also produces an arXiv:1712.05727v2 [cs.CR] 27 Jan 2018 insight view of analysing results for the non-technical investigator. We also test our approach with a large sample of network traffic data. Keywords: Network Investigation, Big Data Forensics, Intercepted Network Traffic, Internet tap, Network Metadata Analysis, Non-Technical Investigator. 1. Introduction Lawful interception is a method that is used by the police force in some countries in almost all middle-to high-level criminal investigations.
    [Show full text]
  • I3: Maximizing Packet Capture Performance
    I3: Maximizing Packet Capture Performance Andrew Brown Agenda • Why do captures drop packets, how can you tell? • Software considerations • Hardware considerations • Potential hardware improvements • Test configurations/parameters • Performance results Sharkfest 2014 What is a drop? • Failure to capture a packet that is part of the traffic in which you’re interested • Dropped packets tend to be the most important • Capture filter will not necessarily help Sharkfest 2014 Why do drops occur? • Applications don’t know that their data is being captured • Result: Only one chance to capture a packet • What can go wrong? Let’s look at the life of a packet Sharkfest 2014 Internal packet flow • Path of a packet from NIC to application (Linux) • Switch output queue drops • Interface drops • Kernel drops Sharkfest 2014 Identifying drops • Software reports drops • L4 indicators (TCP ACKed lost segment) • L7 indicators (app-level sequence numbers revealed by dissector) Sharkfest 2014 When is (and isn’t) it necessary to take steps to maximize capture performance? • Not typically necessary when capturing traffic of <= 1G end device • More commonly necessary when capturing uplink traffic from a TAP or SPAN port • Some sort of action is almost always necessary at 10G • Methods described aren’t always necessary • Methods focus on free solutions Sharkfest 2014 Software considerations - Windows • Quit unnecessary programs • Avoid Wireshark for capturing ˗ Saves to TEMP ˗ Additional processing for packet statistics • Uses CPU • Uses memory over time, can lead
    [Show full text]
  • Airpcap User's Guide
    AirPcap User’s Guide May 2013 © 2013 Riverbed Technology. All rights reserved. Accelerate®, AirPcap®, BlockStream™, Cascade®, Cloud Steelhead®, Granite™, Interceptor®, RiOS®, Riverbed®, Shark®, SkipWare®, Steelhead®, TrafficScript®, TurboCap®, Virtual Steelhead®, Whitewater®, WinPcap®, Wireshark®, and Stingray™ are trademarks or registered trademarks of Riverbed Technology, Inc. in the United States and other countries. Riverbed and any Riverbed product or service name or logo used herein are trademarks of Riverbed Technology. All other trademarks used herein belong to their respective owners. The trademarks and logos displayed herein cannot be used without the prior written consent of Riverbed Technology or their respective owners. Riverbed Technology 199 Fremont Street San Francisco, CA 94105 Tel: +1 415 247 8800 Fax: +1 415 247 8801 www.riverbed.com 712-00090-02 ii Contents The AirPcapProduct Family .................................................................................... 1 A Brief Introduction to 802.11 ................................................................................. 2 Terminology ........................................................................................................ 2 802.11 Standards ................................................................................................. 3 Channels ............................................................................................................. 3 Types of Frames ................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • RIOT: an Open Source Operating System for Low-End Embedded Devices in the Iot Emmanuel Baccelli, Cenk Gundo¨ Gan,˘ Oliver Hahm, Peter Kietzmann, Martine S
    This article has been accepted for publication in a future issue of this journal, but has not been fully edited. Content may change prior to final publication. Citation information: DOI 10.1109/JIOT.2018.2815038, IEEE Internet of Things Journal 1 RIOT: an Open Source Operating System for Low-end Embedded Devices in the IoT Emmanuel Baccelli, Cenk Gundo¨ gan,˘ Oliver Hahm, Peter Kietzmann, Martine S. Lenders, Hauke Petersen, Kaspar Schleiser, Thomas C. Schmidt, and Matthias Wahlisch¨ Abstract—As the Internet of Things (IoT) emerges, compact low-end IoT devices. RIOT runs on minimal memory in the operating systems are required on low-end devices to ease devel- order of ≈10kByte, and can run on devices with neither MMU opment and portability of IoT applications. RIOT is a prominent (memory management unit) nor MPU (memory protection free and open source operating system in this space. In this paper, we provide the first comprehensive overview of RIOT. We cover unit). The goal of this paper is to provide an overview of the key components of interest to potential developers and users: RIOT, both from the operating system point of view, and from the kernel, hardware abstraction, and software modularity, both an open source software and ecosystem point of view. conceptually and in practice for various example configurations. We explain operational aspects like system boot-up, timers, power Prior work [28], [29] has surveyed the space of operating management, and the use of networking. Finally, the relevant APIs as exposed by the operating system are discussed along systems for low-end IoT devices.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Wireshark
    ¡ ¢ £ ¤ ¥ £ ¢ ¦ ¢ £ § ¨ ¤ © ¢ ¦ ¥ ¡ ¥ ¤ ¥ ¢ ¡ ¦ © £ £ ¨ ¡ ¥ ¢ ¨ ¡ 3 INTRODUCTION TO WIRESHARK As mentioned in Chapter 1, several packet-sniffing applications are available for performing network analysis, but we’ll focus mostly on Wireshark in this book. This chapter introduces Wireshark. A Brief History of Wireshark Wireshark has a very rich history. Gerald Combs, a computer science gradu- ate of the University of Missouri at Kansas City, originally developed it out of necessity. The first version of Combs’s application, called Ethereal, was released in 1998 under the GNU Public License (GPL). Eight years after releasing Ethereal, Combs left his job to pursue other career opportunities. Unfortunately, his employer at that time had full rights to the Ethereal trademarks, and Combs was unable to reach an agreement that would allow him to control the Ethereal brand. Instead, Combs and the rest of the development team rebranded the project as Wireshark in mid-2006. ¡ ¢ £ ¤ ¥ £ ¢ ¦ ¢ £ § ¨ ¤ © ¢ ¦ ¥ ¡ ¥ ¤ ¥ ¢ ¡ ¦ © £ £ ¨ ¡ ¥ ¢ ¨ ¡ Wireshark has grown dramatically in popularity, and its collaborative development team now boasts more than 500 contributors. The program that exists under the Ethereal name is no longer being developed. The Benefits of Wireshark Wireshark offers several benefits that make it appealing for everyday use. Aimed at both the up-and-coming and the expert packet analyst, it offers a variety of features to entice each. Let’s examine Wireshark according to the criteria defined in Chapter 1 for selecting a packet-sniffing tool. Supported protocols Wireshark excels in the number of protocols that it supports—more than 1,000 as of this writing. These range from common ones like IP and DHCP to more advanced proprietary proto- cols like DNP3 and BitTorrent.
    [Show full text]
  • Wireshark & Ethereal Network Protocol Analyzer
    377_Eth2e_FM.qxd 11/14/06 1:23 PM Page i Visit us at www.syngress.com Syngress is committed to publishing high-quality books for IT Professionals and delivering those books in media and formats that fit the demands of our cus- tomers. We are also committed to extending the utility of the book you purchase via additional materials available from our Web site. SOLUTIONS WEB SITE To register your book, visit www.syngress.com/solutions. Once registered, you can access our [email protected] Web pages. There you may find an assortment of value-added features such as free e-books related to the topic of this book, URLs of related Web sites, FAQs from the book, corrections, and any updates from the author(s). ULTIMATE CDs Our Ultimate CD product line offers our readers budget-conscious compilations of some of our best-selling backlist titles in Adobe PDF form. These CDs are the perfect way to extend your reference library on key topics pertaining to your area of exper- tise, including Cisco Engineering, Microsoft Windows System Administration, CyberCrime Investigation, Open Source Security, and Firewall Configuration, to name a few. DOWNLOADABLE E-BOOKS For readers who can’t wait for hard copy, we offer most of our titles in download- able Adobe PDF form. These e-books are often available weeks before hard copies, and are priced affordably. SYNGRESS OUTLET Our outlet store at syngress.com features overstocked, out-of-print, or slightly hurt books at significant savings. SITE LICENSING Syngress has a well-established program for site licensing our e-books onto servers in corporations, educational institutions, and large organizations.
    [Show full text]
  • Online Monitoring Using Kismet
    San Jose State University SJSU ScholarWorks Master's Projects Master's Theses and Graduate Research Spring 2012 ONLINE MONITORING USING KISMET Sumit Kumar San Jose State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/etd_projects Part of the Computer Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Kumar, Sumit, "ONLINE MONITORING USING KISMET" (2012). Master's Projects. 243. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31979/etd.rexc-dkr7 https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/etd_projects/243 This Master's Project is brought to you for free and open access by the Master's Theses and Graduate Research at SJSU ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Projects by an authorized administrator of SJSU ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ONLINE MONITORING USING KISMET A Project Presented to The Faculty of the Department of Computer Science San Jose State University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science by Sumit Kumar May 2012 c 2012 Sumit Kumar ALL RIGHTS RESERVED The Designated Project Committee Approves the Project Titled ONLINE MONITORING USING KISMET by Sumit Kumar APPROVED FOR THE DEPARTMENTS OF COMPUTER SCIENCE SAN JOSE STATE UNIVERSITY May 2012 Dr. Mark Stamp Department of Computer Science Dr. Chris Pollett Department of Computer Science Dr. Cay Horstmann Department of Computer Science ABSTRACT Online Monitoring using Kismet by Sumit Kumar Colleges and universities currently use online exams for student evaluation. Stu- dents can take assigned exams using their laptop computers and email their results to their instructor; this process makes testing more efficient and convenient for both students and faculty.
    [Show full text]
  • CIT 485: Exploit Kits
    CIT 485/585 Exploit Kits The primary objective of this assignment is to learn how exploit kits act to compromise victims and how such malware attempts to hide itself. This lesson comes with a set of files containing captured packets in either the PCAP or PCAPNG formats. Sections of the lesson will refer to the appropriate packet capture files to use by name. Use the references in the References section at the bottom of the lesson when needed to answer questions about the protocols in the lesson. STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES 1. Identify malware activity in captured network traffic. 2. Extract files transferred over HTTP. 3. Determine if files are malicious using local and cloud anti-malware tools. INTRODUCTION The objective of this assignment is to learn how to use network data to detect and respond to malware attacks. We will use PCAP tools like Wireshark, the snort IDS, and a two new tools: Clam AV and justniffer. To install ClamAV, run the following commands on your Kali VM. # apt-get update # apt-get install clamav # freshclam Clam AV is a free anti-virus program, which we can use to determine whether executables found in network traffic are malware or not. In addition to ClamAV, we can upload extracted files (or entire pcap files) to VirusTotal to evaluate files using dozens of anti-virus programs. Note that VirusTotal archives uploaded files, so the site should only be used with files that do not contain confidential or sensitive information. Uploading malware executables or example PCAPs from this assignment is fine. Packet captures from corporate networks typically need to have data removed or altered to avoid giving away confidential data and non-confidential but still sensitive data like IP addresses.
    [Show full text]
  • NS-3 Advanced Tutorial: Visualization and Data Collection
    NS-3 Advanced Tutorial: Visualization and Data Collection Tom Henderson (University of Washington and Boeing Research & Technology) L. Felipe Perrone (Bucknell University) March 2013 NS-3 Consortium Meeting 1 March 2013 Outline Getting visualization and raw data from ns-3 • Tracing and packet traces • Gnuplot and Matplotlib • Flow Monitor • PyViz • NetAnim • Statistics • Data Collection Framework 2 NS-3 Consortium Meeting March 2013 Tracing requirements • Tracing is a structured form of simulation output • Example (from ns-2): + 1.84375 0 2 cbr 210 ------- 0 0.0 3.1 225 610 - 1.84375 0 2 cbr 210 ------- 0 0.0 3.1 225 610 r 1.84471 2 1 cbr 210 ------- 1 3.0 1.0 195 600 r 1.84566 2 0 ack 40 ------- 2 3.2 0.1 82 602 + 1.84566 0 2 tcp 1000 ------- 2 0.1 3.2 102 611 Problem: Tracing needs vary widely – would like to change tracing output without editing the core – would like to support multiple outputs 3 NS-3 Consortium Meeting March 2013 Tracing in ns-3 • ns-3 configures multiple 'TraceSource' objects (TracedValue, TracedCallback) • Multiple types of 'TraceSink' objects can be hooked to these sources • A special configuration namespace helps to manage access to trace sources TracedValue Config::Connect ("/path/to/traced/value", callback1); TraceSource Config::Connect ("/path/to/trace/source", callback2); TraceSource unattached NS-3 Consortium Meeting March 2013 NetDevice trace hooks • Example: CsmaNetDevice NetDevice:: CsmaNetDevice::Send () ReceiveCallback MacTx MacRx MacDrop queue Sniffer PromiscSniffer MacTxBackoff PhyTxBegin PhyRxEnd
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluating Kismet and Netstumbler As Network Security Tools & Solutions
    Master Thesis MEE10:59 Evaluating Kismet and NetStumbler as Network Security Tools & Solutions Ekhator Stephen Aimuanmwosa This thesis is presented as part requirement for the award of Master of Science Degree in Electrical Engineering Blekinge Institute of Technology January 2010 © Ekhator Stephen Aimuanmwosa, 2010 Blekinge Institute of Technology (BTH) School of Engineering Department of Telecommunication & Signal Processing Supervisor: Fredrik Erlandsson (universitetsadjunkt) Examiner: Fredrik Erlandsson (universitetsadjunkt i Evaluating Kismet and NetStumbler as Network Security Tools & Solutions “Even the knowledge of my own fallibility cannot keep me from making mistakes. Only when I fall do I get up again”. - Vincent van Gogh © Ekhator Stephen Aimuanmwosa, (BTH) Karlskrona January, 2010 Email: [email protected] ii Evaluating Kismet and NetStumbler as Network Security Tools & Solutions ABSTRACT Despite advancement in computer firewalls and intrusion detection systems, wired and wireless networks are experiencing increasing threat to data theft and violations through personal and corporate computers and networks. The ubiquitous WiFi technology which makes it possible for an intruder to scan for data in the air, the use of crypto-analytic software and brute force application to lay bare encrypted messages has not made computers security and networks security safe more so any much easier for network security administrators to handle. In fact the security problems and solution of information systems are becoming more and more complex and complicated as new exploit security tools like Kismet and Netsh (a NetStumbler alternative) are developed. This thesis work tried to look at the passive detection of wireless network capability of kismet and how it function and comparing it with the default windows network shell ability to also detect networks wirelessly and how vulnerable they make secured and non-secured wireless network.
    [Show full text]