University of Alberta Peter Dobozy Master of Arts

University of Alberta Holy Intertextual Identity Conditions, Batman! By Peter Dobozy A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Department of Philosophy ©Peter Dobozy Fall 2010 Edmonton, Alberta Permission is hereby granted to the University of Alberta Libraries to reproduce single copies of this thesis and to lend or sell such copies for private, scholarly or scientific research purposes only. Where the thesis is converted to, or otherwise made available in digital form, the University of Alberta will advise potential users of the thesis of these terms. The author reserves all other publication and other rights in association with the copyright in the thesis and, except as herein before provided, neither the thesis nor any substantial portion thereof may be printed or otherwise reproduced in any material form whatsoever without the author's prior written permission. Library and Archives Bibliothèque et Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de l’édition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre référence ISBN: 978-0-494-68028-5 Our file Notre référence ISBN: 978-0-494-68028-5 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non- L’auteur a accordé une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library and permettant à la Bibliothèque et Archives Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par télécommunication ou par l’Internet, prêter, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des thèses partout dans le loan, distribute and sell theses monde, à des fins commerciales ou autres, sur worldwide, for commercial or non- support microforme, papier, électronique et/ou commercial purposes, in microform, autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L’auteur conserve la propriété du droit d’auteur ownership and moral rights in this et des droits moraux qui protège cette thèse. Ni thesis. Neither the thesis nor la thèse ni des extraits substantiels de celle-ci substantial extracts from it may be ne doivent être imprimés ou autrement printed or otherwise reproduced reproduits sans son autorisation. without the author’s permission. In compliance with the Canadian Conformément à la loi canadienne sur la Privacy Act some supporting forms protection de la vie privée, quelques may have been removed from this formulaires secondaires ont été enlevés de thesis. cette thèse. While these forms may be included Bien que ces formulaires aient inclus dans in the document page count, their la pagination, il n’y aura aucun contenu removal does not represent any loss manquant. of content from the thesis. EXAMINING COMMITTEE Bernard Linsky, Department of Philosophy Amy Schmitter, Department of Philosophy Phil Corkum, Department of Philosophy Albert Braz, Department of Interdisciplinary Studies ABSTRACT Fictional characters pose interesting questions both to metaphysics and philosophy of language. We appear to have two incompatible intuitions about fictional characters: 1) fictional characters are created and 2) fictional characters are nonexistent. To say something is created is to say that it exists. However, to say that fictional characters are nonexistent, suggests that they are not created. Various theories attempt to explain the ontological status of fictional characters based on one of these intuitions. Once a theory is adopted, a subsequent concern is how that theory might identify individual fictional characters. I investigate two such proposals that are based on our second intuition. I argue that these attempts are uncharitably criticized because they have not been fully developed. I develop these attempts further to show how they can withstand previous criticisms. However, in doing so, I expose other problems faced by these attempts that appears to genuinely lead to their demise. TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1: Fictional Characters 1.0 Fictional Characters .............................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Challenging Our Intuitions .................................................................................................................... 3 1.2 A Meinongian Account of Fictional Characters ..................................................................................... 7 1.3 Universals, Types and Job Descriptions ................................................................................................ 13 1.4 Possible Objects ................................................................................................................................... 19 1.5 Creationist Accounts of Fictional Characters ........................................................................................ 24 1.6 Creation by Pretence ............................................................................................................................ 24 1.7 Fictional Characters as Theoretical Entities ......................................................................................... 29 1.8 Fictional Characters as Abstract Artefacts ........................................................................................... 34 Chapter 2: Who is The Batman? 2.0 Holy Homework, Batman! .................................................................................................................. 39 2.1 The Publications .................................................................................................................................. 40 2.2 A “Biography” of The Batman............................................................................................................ 42 2.3 Holy Complications, Batman! .............................................................................................................. 46 2.4 The Bat-Atom .................................................................................................................................... 49 2.5 The Batman of Continuity ................................................................................................................... 63 2.6 The Concept of a Sequel....................................................................................................................... 74 Chapter 3: Conclusions, shortcomings and Further Considerations 3.0 Conclusions ......................................................................................................................................... 91 3.1 Shortcomings and Further Considerations ............................................................................................ 94 References ....................................................................................................................................................... 99 CHAPTER 1: FICTIONAL CHARACTERS 1.0 Fictional Characters Fictional characters are a much stranger breed of entity than one might initially suspect. Consider how one might intuitively answer the following question: what is a fictional character? Intuitive answers include all sorts of vague and synonymous jargon such as “a fabrication of the author’s mind,” “a creation of the author” “made up,” “does not exist” and so forth. The inquisitive, however, would quickly realize that such jargon is problematic. For instance, how can we say there are such things as fictional characters, if they are not supposed to exist? Similarly, how can we say that an author created an entity, which is simultaneously nonexistent? How can something, which does not exist, have properties? Furthermore, how are assertions about such entities true or false, especially when considered within the context of the real, existent world? These are but a few of the questions to trouble the ontology of fictional characters. As such, our intuitive answers no longer appear so intuitive. Regrettably, these questions are without definitive answers. However, of the many noble efforts made to answer these questions, some certainly show more promise than others. An assessment of several of these efforts will be the first objective of my thesis. My motivation for doing so, however, is to understand the parameters required to investigate another equally compelling question: how do we identify individual fictional characters? More specifically, how can we identify fictional characters “intertextually”1 i.e., from one story to the next? The answer is not as obvious as one might think. The reason why it is not so obvious, I believe, is that people far too often fail to consider the more extreme examples 1 I am importing the terms intertextual, intratextual and extratextual from Uri Margolin’s “Characters and their Versions.” 1 of fictional characters, examples which introduce peculiarities that one might not otherwise consider. One such extreme example is The Batman character. However, before I begin, I should warn that The Batman character is philosophically valuable for many reasons, reasons that are well beyond the scope of my investigation and certainly of a quantity greater than what I can afford to address. The first and most relevant peculiarity of The Batman character is the excessively large quantity of literature2 that is the product of seventy years worth of publications. Such a large quantity of publications

Load more