DOCSLIB.ORG

UC Office of the President UC Publications in Entomology

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
UC Office of the President UC Publications in Entomology UC Office of the President UC Publications in Entomology Title Phylogenetic Relationships within Heliodinidae and Systematics of Moths Formerly Assigned to Heliodines Stainton (Lepidoptera: Yponomeutoidea) Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8679h5mj Authors Hsu, Yu-Feng Powell, Jerry A. Publication Date 2004-11-01 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Phylogenetic Relationships within Heliodinidae and Systematics of Moths Formerly Assigned to Heliodines Stainton (Lepidoptera: Yponomeutoidea) Yu-Feng Hsu and Jerry A. Powell Phylogenetic Relationships within Heliodinidae and Systematics of Moths Formerly Assigned to Heliodines Stainton (Lepidoptera: Yponomeutoidea) Yu-Feng Hsu and Jerry A. Powell UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PRESS Berkeley • Los Angeles • London UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PUBLICATIONS IN ENTOMOLGY Editorial Board: Penny Gullan, Bradford A. Hawkins, John Heraty, Lynn S. Kimsey, Serguei V. Triapitsyn, Philip S. Ward, Kipling Will Volume 124 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PRESS BERKELEY AND LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PRESS, LTD. LONDON, ENGLAND © 2005 BY THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PRINTED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Hsu, Yu-Feng, 1963– Phylogenetic relationships within Heliodinidae and systematics of moths formerly assigned to Heliodines Stainton (Lepidoptera: Yponomeutoidea) / Yu-Feng Hsu and Jerry A. Powell. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 0-520-09847-1 (paper : alk. paper) — (University of California publications in entomology ; 124) 1. Heliodinidae—Classification. 2. Heliodinidae—Phylogeny. I. Title. II. Series. QL561.H44 H78 595.78 22—dc22 2004058800 Manufactured in the United States of America The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of ANSI/NISO Z39.48-1992 (R 1997) (Permanence of Paper). Contents Acknowledgments, ix Abstract, xi Introduction ...................................................... 1 Problems in Systematics of Heliodinidae and a Historical Review ............ 4 Material and Methods ............................................ 6 Specimens and Depositories, 6 Dissections and Measurements, 7 Wing Venation Preparation, 7 Scanning Electron Microscope Preparation, 8 Species Discrimination and Description, 8 Larval Rearing Procedures, 8 Phylogenetic Methods, 9 Phylogeny of Heliodinidae ......................................... 12 Monophyly of Heliodinidae, 12 Characters and States Used in the Cladistic Analyses, 13 Results of Phylogenetic Analyses, 19 Systematic Account ................................................ 27 Family Heliodinidae Heinemann, 27 Key to the Genera of Heliodinidae and Species Groups of Aetole, 29 Heliodines assemblage, 31 Heliodines Stainton, 31 H. roesella (Linnaeus), 32 Epicroesa assemblage, 35 Epicroesa Meyrick, 35 Philocoristis Meyrick, 35 Lamprolophus assemblage, 36 Lamprolophus Busck, 36 Aetole assemblage, 36 ‘Heliodines’ princeps subassemblage, 36 ‘Heliodines’ princeps lineage, 36 ‘Heliodines’ princeps Meyrick, 37 Lithariapteryx subassemblage, 38 Lithariapteryx Chambers, 38 Neoheliodines Hsu, new genus, 38 Key to species of Neoheliodines, 40 N. nyctaginella (Gibson), new combination, 40 N. eurypterus Hsu, new species, 43 N. hodgesi Hsu, new species, 43 N. megostiellus Hsu, new species, 46 N. melanobasilarus Hsu, new species, 47 N. vernius Hsu, new species, 48 N. cliffordi (Harrison and Passoa), new combination, 51 N. arizonense Hsu, new species, 53 N. albidentus Hsu, new species, 55 Aetole subassemblage, 56 Embola Walsingham, 56 Key to species of Embola of North and Central America, 58 E. ionis (Clarke), new combination, 59 E. ciccella (Barnes and Busck), new combination, 61 E. cyanozostera Hsu, new species, 63 E. albaciliella (Busck), new combination, 64 E. friedlanderi Hsu, new species, 66 E. melanotela Hsu, new species, 67 E. autumnalis Hsu, new species, 68 E. sexpunctella (Walsingham), new combination, 69 E. dentifer Walsingham, 70 E. powelli Hsu, 71 E. xanthocephala Walsingham, 73 Heliogemma Hsu, new genus, 74 H. gigantea Hsu, new species, 75 H. grandis Hsu, new species, 76 H. preclara Hsu, new species, 77 Pseudastasia Walsingham, 78 Euheliodines Hsu, new genus, 79 E. chemsaki Hsu, new species, 79 E. jaliscella Hsu, new species, 81 Aetole Chambers, revised status, 82 Eximia Group, 83 A. eximia Hsu, new species, 84 A. insolita Hsu, new species, 86 Bella Group, 87 A. bella Chambers, 88 A. schulzella (Fabricius), new combination, 93 A. fulgida Hsu, new species, 95 A. prenticei Hsu, new species, 96 Tripunctella Group, 99 A. tripunctella (Walsingham), new combination, 101 A. unipunctella (Walsingham), new combination, 103 A. inusitata Hsu, new species, 107 A. aprica Hsu, new species, 108 A. cera Hsu, new species, 108 A. favonia Hsu, new species, 110 Extraneella Group, 111 A. extraneella (Walsingham), new combination, 112 Calcifer Group, 116 A. calcifer (Walsingham), new combination, 117 A. calciferoides Hsu, new species, 119 Galapagoensis Group, 121 A. galapagoensis (Heppner and B. Landry), new combination, 122 Copocentra Meyrick, 123 Scelorthus Busck, 124 Incertae Sedis, 124 ‘Heliodines’ aureoflamma Walsingham, 124 ‘H.’ marginata Walsingham, 125 ‘H.’ urichi Busck, 126 Biology ........................................................ 127 Larval Host Plant Relationships, 127 Life History, Voltinism, and Diapause, 129 Behavior, 129 Mating, 129 Hind Leg Posture, 130 Oviposition, 130 Larval Biology, 130 Pupal Biology, 131 Summary ...................................................... .133 Tables, 134 Literature Cited, 148 Figures 26–220, 159 Acknowledgments We are grateful to the following for assistance in field work, comments on the manuscript, the loan of specimens, and other contributions: John Brown, Systematic Entomology Laboratory, USDA, U.S. National Museum of Natural History, Washington, D.C.; John Chemsak, Essig Museum of Entomology, University of California, Berkeley; David Furth, formerly at the Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, Cambridge; Reinhard Gaeike, Deutsches Entomologisches Institut, Eberswalde; Terry Harrison, University of Illinois, Urbana; John Heppner, Florida State Collection of Arthropods, Gainesville; Ronald Hodges, Eugene, Oregon, formerly USDA, U.S. National Museum of Natural History, Washington, D.C.; Niels Kristensen, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken; Bernard Landry, Muséum d’histoire naturelle, Geneva; Jean-François Landry, Canadian National Collection, Ottawa; Martin Lodl, Naturhistorisches Museum Wien, Vienna, Austria; Carolina Martin, Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, Madrid, Spain; Scott Miller, formerly of the Bishop Museum, Honolulu, Hawaii; Sigeru Moriuti and Toshiya Hirowatari, University of Osaka Prefecture, Sakai, Japan; Norman Penny, California Academy of Sciences, San Francisco; Michael Prentice, Jorge Santiago-Blay, and Robert Zuparko, University of California, Berkeley; Edward Riley, Texas A.&M. University, College Station; Michael Shaffer, Natural History Museum, London; Frederick Stehr, Michigan State University, East Lansing; David Wagner, University of Connecticut, Storrs; Shen-Horn Yen, Imperial College at Silwood Park, Ascot. Brown and Harrison provided detailed critical reviews of the manuscript that were exceptionally useful. Many plant identifications were made by Barbara Ertter, UC Herbarium, which retains the voucher specimens. YFH is especially indebted to John Doyen and Thomas Duncan, University of California, Berkeley, for many helpful comments and suggestions and Christopher Meacham and Brent Mishler for assistance with cladistic analysis. Finally, we are indebted to Gordon Nishida, who prepared the illustrations in electronic format, and provided other computer expertise enabling completion of the final copy. ix Abstract Heliodinidae traditionally have been characterized on the basis of forewing venation, color and scaling, and perch behavior, but none of these attributes defines monophyly. We identify four uniquely derived autapomorphies for the family: (1) M vein of forewing two-branched, presumably with M3 lost; (2) tegumen greatly expanded posteriorly, forming a sclerotized, hollow tube; (3) ventral branches of apophyses anteriores originating from a fused transverse bridge; and (4) pupa with long, stiff dorsal and lateral setae. Phylogenetic relationships among genera and species groups of world Heliodinidae are constructed using parsimony and character compatibility as optimality criteria, with representatives of six other families of Yponomeutoidea as outgroups. Results of the analyses show Heliodines Stainton, as formerly recognized (i.e., all the species with conspicuous red markings on the forewings), to be a polyphyletic assemblage. To accommodate the New World fauna, two old names, Aetole Chambers and Embola Walsingham, have been resurrected from synonymy, and three new genera are described: Neoheliodines Hsu (Type species: Heliodines nyctaginella Gibson, 1914), Heliogemma Hsu (Type species: H. gigantea Hsu), and Euheliodines Hsu (Type species: E. chemsaki Hsu). The South American genus Crembalastis Meyrick is synonymized with Embola. A descriptive taxonomy is provided for North and Central American and Caribbean species formerly assigned to Heliodines; 45 species are treated, 25 of which are described as new: Aetole fulgida (TL: Sinaloa, Mexico), A. prenticei (Calif.), A. eximia (Baja Calif., Mexico), A. insolita (El Salvador), A. cera (Calif.), A. favonia (Calif.), A. inusitata
Load more

Recommended publications
  • SYSTEMATICS of the MEGADIVERSE SUPERFAMILY GELECHIOIDEA (INSECTA: LEPIDOPTEA) DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of T
    SYSTEMATICS OF THE MEGADIVERSE SUPERFAMILY GELECHIOIDEA (INSECTA: LEPIDOPTEA) DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for The Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Sibyl Rae Bucheli, M.S. ***** The Ohio State University 2005 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Dr. John W. Wenzel, Advisor Dr. Daniel Herms Dr. Hans Klompen _________________________________ Dr. Steven C. Passoa Advisor Graduate Program in Entomology ABSTRACT The phylogenetics, systematics, taxonomy, and biology of Gelechioidea (Insecta: Lepidoptera) are investigated. This superfamily is probably the second largest in all of Lepidoptera, and it remains one of the least well known. Taxonomy of Gelechioidea has been unstable historically, and definitions vary at the family and subfamily levels. In Chapters Two and Three, I review the taxonomy of Gelechioidea and characters that have been important, with attention to what characters or terms were used by different authors. I revise the coding of characters that are already in the literature, and provide new data as well. Chapter Four provides the first phylogenetic analysis of Gelechioidea to include molecular data. I combine novel DNA sequence data from Cytochrome oxidase I and II with morphological matrices for exemplar species. The results challenge current concepts of Gelechioidea, suggesting that traditional morphological characters that have united taxa may not be homologous structures and are in need of further investigation. Resolution of this problem will require more detailed analysis and more thorough characterization of certain lineages. To begin this task, I conduct in Chapter Five an in- depth study of morphological evolution, host-plant selection, and geographical distribution of a medium-sized genus Depressaria Haworth (Depressariinae), larvae of ii which generally feed on plants in the families Asteraceae and Apiaceae.
    [Show full text]
  • Butterflies of Ontario & Summaries of Lepidoptera
    ISBN #: 0-921631-12-X BUTTERFLIES OF ONTARIO & SUMMARIES OF LEPIDOPTERA ENCOUNTERED IN ONTARIO IN 1991 BY A.J. HANKS &Q.F. HESS PRODUCTION BY ALAN J. HANKS APRIL 1992 CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION PAGE 1 2. WEATHER DURING THE 1991 SEASON 6 3. CORRECTIONS TO PREVIOUS T.E.A. SUMMARIES 7 4. SPECIAL NOTES ON ONTARIO LEPIDOPTERA 8 4.1 The Inornate Ringlet in Middlesex & Lambton Cos. 8 4.2 The Monarch in Ontario 8 4.3 The Status of the Karner Blue & Frosted Elfin in Ontario in 1991 11 4.4 The West Virginia White in Ontario in 1991 11 4.5 Butterfly & Moth Records for Kettle Point 11 4.6 Butterflies in the Hamilton Study Area 12 4.7 Notes & Observations on the Early Hairstreak 15 4.8 A Big Day for Migrants 16 4.9 The Ocola Skipper - New to Ontario & Canada .17 4.10 The Brazilian Skipper - New to Ontario & Canada 19 4.11 Further Notes on the Zarucco Dusky Wing in Ontario 21 4.12 A Range Extension for the Large Marblewing 22 4.13 The Grayling North of Lake Superior 22 4.14 Description of an Aberrant Crescent 23 4.15 A New Foodplant for the Old World Swallowtail 24 4.16 An Owl Moth at Point Pelee 25 4.17 Butterfly Sampling in Algoma District 26 4.18 Record Early Butterfly Dates in 1991 26 4.19 Rearing Notes from Northumberland County 28 5. GENERAL SUMMARY 29 6. 1990 SUMMARY OF ONTARIO BUTTERFLIES, SKIPPERS & MOTHS 32 Hesperiidae 32 Papilionidae 42 Pieridae 44 Lycaenidae 48 Libytheidae 56 Nymphalidae 56 Apaturidae 66 Satyr1dae 66 Danaidae 70 MOTHS 72 CONTINUOUS MOTH CYCLICAL SUMMARY 85 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidoptera of North America 5
    Lepidoptera of North America 5. Contributions to the Knowledge of Southern West Virginia Lepidoptera Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Lepidoptera of North America 5. Contributions to the Knowledge of Southern West Virginia Lepidoptera by Valerio Albu, 1411 E. Sweetbriar Drive Fresno, CA 93720 and Eric Metzler, 1241 Kildale Square North Columbus, OH 43229 April 30, 2004 Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Cover illustration: Blueberry Sphinx (Paonias astylus (Drury)], an eastern endemic. Photo by Valeriu Albu. ISBN 1084-8819 This publication and others in the series may be ordered from the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity, Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523 Abstract A list of 1531 species ofLepidoptera is presented, collected over 15 years (1988 to 2002), in eleven southern West Virginia counties. A variety of collecting methods was used, including netting, light attracting, light trapping and pheromone trapping. The specimens were identified by the currently available pictorial sources and determination keys. Many were also sent to specialists for confirmation or identification. The majority of the data was from Kanawha County, reflecting the area of more intensive sampling effort by the senior author. This imbalance of data between Kanawha County and other counties should even out with further sampling of the area. Key Words: Appalachian Mountains,
    [Show full text]
  • New Records of Microlepidoptera in Alberta, Canada
    Volume 59 2005 Number 2 Journal of the Lepidopterists’ Society 59(2), 2005, 61-82 NEW RECORDS OF MICROLEPIDOPTERA IN ALBERTA, CANADA GREGORY R. POHL Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Northern Forestry Centre, 5320 - 122 St., Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6H 3S5 email: [email protected] CHARLES D. BIRD Box 22, Erskine, Alberta, Canada T0C 1G0 email: [email protected] JEAN-FRANÇOIS LANDRY Agriculture & Agri-Food Canada, 960 Carling Ave, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1A 0C6 email: [email protected] AND GARY G. ANWEILER E.H. Strickland Entomology Museum, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T6G 2H1 email: [email protected] ABSTRACT. Fifty-seven species of microlepidoptera are reported as new for the Province of Alberta, based primarily on speci- mens in the Northern Forestry Research Collection of the Canadian Forest Service, the University of Alberta Strickland Museum, the Canadian National Collection of Insects, Arachnids, and Nematodes, and the personal collections of the first two authors. These new records are in the families Eriocraniidae, Prodoxidae, Tineidae, Psychidae, Gracillariidae, Ypsolophidae, Plutellidae, Acrolepi- idae, Glyphipterigidae, Elachistidae, Glyphidoceridae, Coleophoridae, Gelechiidae, Xyloryctidae, Sesiidae, Tortricidae, Schrecken- steiniidae, Epermeniidae, Pyralidae, and Crambidae. These records represent the first published report of the families Eriocrani- idae and Glyphidoceridae in Alberta, of Acrolepiidae in western Canada, and of Schreckensteiniidae in Canada. Tetragma gei, Tegeticula
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of Sampling and Monitoring Methods for Beneficial Arthropods
    insects Review A Review of Sampling and Monitoring Methods for Beneficial Arthropods in Agroecosystems Kenneth W. McCravy Department of Biological Sciences, Western Illinois University, 1 University Circle, Macomb, IL 61455, USA; [email protected]; Tel.: +1-309-298-2160 Received: 12 September 2018; Accepted: 19 November 2018; Published: 23 November 2018 Abstract: Beneficial arthropods provide many important ecosystem services. In agroecosystems, pollination and control of crop pests provide benefits worth billions of dollars annually. Effective sampling and monitoring of these beneficial arthropods is essential for ensuring their short- and long-term viability and effectiveness. There are numerous methods available for sampling beneficial arthropods in a variety of habitats, and these methods can vary in efficiency and effectiveness. In this paper I review active and passive sampling methods for non-Apis bees and arthropod natural enemies of agricultural pests, including methods for sampling flying insects, arthropods on vegetation and in soil and litter environments, and estimation of predation and parasitism rates. Sample sizes, lethal sampling, and the potential usefulness of bycatch are also discussed. Keywords: sampling methodology; bee monitoring; beneficial arthropods; natural enemy monitoring; vane traps; Malaise traps; bowl traps; pitfall traps; insect netting; epigeic arthropod sampling 1. Introduction To sustainably use the Earth’s resources for our benefit, it is essential that we understand the ecology of human-altered systems and the organisms that inhabit them. Agroecosystems include agricultural activities plus living and nonliving components that interact with these activities in a variety of ways. Beneficial arthropods, such as pollinators of crops and natural enemies of arthropod pests and weeds, play important roles in the economic and ecological success of agroecosystems.
    [Show full text]
  • Nota Lepidopterologica
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Nota lepidopterologica Jahr/Year: 1994 Band/Volume: 17 Autor(en)/Author(s): Riedl Tadeusz Artikel/Article: Une nouvelle espèce européenne du genre Pancalia Stephens (Lepidoptera : Cosmopterigidae, Antequerinae) 87-91 ©Societas Europaea Lepidopterologica; download unter http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/ und www.zobodat.at Nota lepid. 17 (1/2) : 87-91 ; 30.XI.1994 ISSN 0342-7536 Une nouvelle espèce européenne du genre Pancalia Stephens (Lepidoptera : Cosmopterigidae, Antequerinae) Tadeusz Riedl Witosa 5/5, 80-809 Gdansk, Pologne Summary A new European species of the genus Pancalia Stephens (Lepidoptera, Cosmo- pterigidae, Antequerinae) — Pancalia baldizzonella sp. n. is described from southern Italy. Adults and genitalia of both sexes are illustrated. The new species is most closely related to P. latreillella Curtis and P. nodosella (Bruand), from which it can be distinguished by the wing markings and genitalic cha- racters. Résumé Description de Pancalia baldizzonella sp. n. d'Italie méridionale. Les adultes et les armures génitales des deux sexes de ce taxon sont figurées. Zusammenfassung Pancalia baldizzonella sp. n. wird aus Süditalien beschrieben. Die Imagines und die Genitalien beider Geschlechter werden abgebildet. Die neue Art steht P latreillella Curtis und P nodosella (Bruand) am nächsten, von denen sie sich durch die Flügelzeichnung und Genitalmerkmale unterscheidet. Introduction Depuis la parution d'un article de Gaedike (1967) consacré aux espèces de Pancalia Stephens, 1829, ce genre et ses espèces ont été étudiés à plusieurs réprises (Leraut, 1984 ; Riedl, 1984 ; Sinev, 1985). Ces études ont permis d'expliquer la position systématique du genre en question et de confirmer, après deux révisions, l'existence de 9 espèces nomi- nales habitant uniquement la zone paléarctique, à savoir P.
    [Show full text]
  • To Us Insectometers, It Is Clear That Insect Decline in Our Costa Rican
    SPECIAL FEATURE: PERSPECTIVE To us insectometers, it is clear that insect decline in our Costa Rican tropics is real, so let’sbekindto SPECIAL FEATURE: PERSPECTIVE the survivors Daniel H. Janzena,1 and Winnie Hallwachsa Edited by David L. Wagner, University of Connecticut, and accepted by Editorial Board Member May R. Berenbaum November 11, 2020 (received for review April 6, 2020) We have been field observers of tropical insects on four continents and, since 1978, intense observers of caterpillars, their parasites, and their associates in the 1,260 km2 of dry, cloud, and rain forests of Area´ de Conservaci ´onGuanacaste (ACG) in northwestern Costa Rica. ACG’s natural ecosystem restoration began with its national park designation in 1971. As human biomonitors, or “insectometers,” we see that ACG’s insect species richness and density have gradually declined since the late 1970s, and more intensely since about 2005. The overarching perturbation is climate change. It has caused increasing ambient tempera- tures for all ecosystems; more erratic seasonal cues; reduced, erratic, and asynchronous rainfall; heated air masses sliding up the volcanoes and burning off the cloud forest; and dwindling biodiversity in all ACG terrestrial ecosystems. What then is the next step as climate change descends on ACG’s many small-scale successes in sustainable biodevelopment? Be kind to the survivors by stimulating and facilitating their owner societies to value them as legitimate members of a green sustainable nation. Encourage national bioliteracy, BioAlfa. climate change | BioAlfa | conservation by rewilding | biodevelopment | insect decline As “insectometers,” also known as human biomoni- eventually focused into Area´ de Conservaci ´onGuana- tors, we have watched the conspicuous ongoing de- caste (ACG) in northwestern Costa Rica (8–13) (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • State of New York City's Plants 2018
    STATE OF NEW YORK CITY’S PLANTS 2018 Daniel Atha & Brian Boom © 2018 The New York Botanical Garden All rights reserved ISBN 978-0-89327-955-4 Center for Conservation Strategy The New York Botanical Garden 2900 Southern Boulevard Bronx, NY 10458 All photos NYBG staff Citation: Atha, D. and B. Boom. 2018. State of New York City’s Plants 2018. Center for Conservation Strategy. The New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, NY. 132 pp. STATE OF NEW YORK CITY’S PLANTS 2018 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 INTRODUCTION 10 DOCUMENTING THE CITY’S PLANTS 10 The Flora of New York City 11 Rare Species 14 Focus on Specific Area 16 Botanical Spectacle: Summer Snow 18 CITIZEN SCIENCE 20 THREATS TO THE CITY’S PLANTS 24 NEW YORK STATE PROHIBITED AND REGULATED INVASIVE SPECIES FOUND IN NEW YORK CITY 26 LOOKING AHEAD 27 CONTRIBUTORS AND ACKNOWLEGMENTS 30 LITERATURE CITED 31 APPENDIX Checklist of the Spontaneous Vascular Plants of New York City 32 Ferns and Fern Allies 35 Gymnosperms 36 Nymphaeales and Magnoliids 37 Monocots 67 Dicots 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report, State of New York City’s Plants 2018, is the first rankings of rare, threatened, endangered, and extinct species of what is envisioned by the Center for Conservation Strategy known from New York City, and based on this compilation of The New York Botanical Garden as annual updates thirteen percent of the City’s flora is imperiled or extinct in New summarizing the status of the spontaneous plant species of the York City. five boroughs of New York City. This year’s report deals with the City’s vascular plants (ferns and fern allies, gymnosperms, We have begun the process of assessing conservation status and flowering plants), but in the future it is planned to phase in at the local level for all species.
    [Show full text]
  • Big Creek Lepidoptera Checklist
    Big Creek Lepidoptera Checklist Prepared by J.A. Powell, Essig Museum of Entomology, UC Berkeley. For a description of the Big Creek Lepidoptera Survey, see Powell, J.A. Big Creek Reserve Lepidoptera Survey: Recovery of Populations after the 1985 Rat Creek Fire. In Views of a Coastal Wilderness: 20 Years of Research at Big Creek Reserve. (copies available at the reserve). family genus species subspecies author Acrolepiidae Acrolepiopsis californica Gaedicke Adelidae Adela flammeusella Chambers Adelidae Adela punctiferella Walsingham Adelidae Adela septentrionella Walsingham Adelidae Adela trigrapha Zeller Alucitidae Alucita hexadactyla Linnaeus Arctiidae Apantesis ornata (Packard) Arctiidae Apantesis proxima (Guerin-Meneville) Arctiidae Arachnis picta Packard Arctiidae Cisthene deserta (Felder) Arctiidae Cisthene faustinula (Boisduval) Arctiidae Cisthene liberomacula (Dyar) Arctiidae Gnophaela latipennis (Boisduval) Arctiidae Hemihyalea edwardsii (Packard) Arctiidae Lophocampa maculata Harris Arctiidae Lycomorpha grotei (Packard) Arctiidae Spilosoma vagans (Boisduval) Arctiidae Spilosoma vestalis Packard Argyresthiidae Argyresthia cupressella Walsingham Argyresthiidae Argyresthia franciscella Busck Argyresthiidae Argyresthia sp. (gray) Blastobasidae ?genus Blastobasidae Blastobasis ?glandulella (Riley) Blastobasidae Holcocera (sp.1) Blastobasidae Holcocera (sp.2) Blastobasidae Holcocera (sp.3) Blastobasidae Holcocera (sp.4) Blastobasidae Holcocera (sp.5) Blastobasidae Holcocera (sp.6) Blastobasidae Holcocera gigantella (Chambers) Blastobasidae
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity and Ecology of Critically Endangered, Rûens Silcrete Renosterveld in the Buffeljagsrivier Area, Swellendam
    Biodiversity and Ecology of Critically Endangered, Rûens Silcrete Renosterveld in the Buffeljagsrivier area, Swellendam by Johannes Philippus Groenewald Thesis presented in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Masters in Science in Conservation Ecology in the Faculty of AgriSciences at Stellenbosch University Supervisor: Prof. Michael J. Samways Co-supervisor: Dr. Ruan Veldtman December 2014 Stellenbosch University http://scholar.sun.ac.za Declaration I hereby declare that the work contained in this thesis, for the degree of Master of Science in Conservation Ecology, is my own work that have not been previously published in full or in part at any other University. All work that are not my own, are acknowledge in the thesis. ___________________ Date: ____________ Groenewald J.P. Copyright © 2014 Stellenbosch University All rights reserved ii Stellenbosch University http://scholar.sun.ac.za Acknowledgements Firstly I want to thank my supervisor Prof. M. J. Samways for his guidance and patience through the years and my co-supervisor Dr. R. Veldtman for his help the past few years. This project would not have been possible without the help of Prof. H. Geertsema, who helped me with the identification of the Lepidoptera and other insect caught in the study area. Also want to thank Dr. K. Oberlander for the help with the identification of the Oxalis species found in the study area and Flora Cameron from CREW with the identification of some of the special plants growing in the area. I further express my gratitude to Dr. Odette Curtis from the Overberg Renosterveld Project, who helped with the identification of the rare species found in the study area as well as information about grazing and burning of Renosterveld.
    [Show full text]
  • LEPIDOPTERA), PART II, by M
    Journal of the Lepidopterists' Society 48(1 ), 1994, 74-76 BOOK REVIEWS KEYS TO THE INSECTS OF THE EUROPEAN PART OF THE USSR (G. S. Medvedev, chief editor). VOLUME IV (LEPIDOPTERA), PART II, by M. I. Falkovit'lh (ed.) et al. 1990. E. J. Brill, Leiden. (translation of: OPREDELITEL NASEKOMYKH EVEOPEISKOI CHASTI SSSR, TOM IV, CHESHUEKRYLYE, VTORAIA CHAST. Nauka Publishers, Leningrad, 1981-trans­ lator: B. R. Sharma). x + 1092 pp., 675 figs. Hard cover, 16 x 24 cm, ISBN 90-04-08926- 8. $160.00 U.S. Available from E. J. Brill (U.S.A.) Inc., 24 Huclson Street, Kinderhook, New York 12106. This remarkable, bulky handbook is the second part of a work devoted to the Lepi­ doptera of western Russia. The English version of Part One was issued in 1987 (Amerind Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd, New Delhi-edition supervised by the U.S.D.A. , Washington, D.C.), and it covered the non-ditrysian families (with only a superficial treatment of the Nepticulidae), and eight families among the lower Ditrysia, namely the Psychidae and dll members of the Zygaenoidea, Cossoidea, Sesioidea and Tortricoidea. Part Two deals with a larger number of families (29 if one accepts the classification that I proposed in 1991: see Entomol. Seand. 22:90-91). These are the Eriocottidae and Tineidae (including the "Euplocamidae" and "Hieroxestidae" ), all members of the Gracillarioidea, Ypono­ meutoidea, Choreutoidea, Urodoidea (Woekia Heinemann: p. 508, as a "plutellid" genus), Schreckensteinioidea, and Epermenioidea, and all the gelechioid families with the ex­ ception of most Coleophoridae (only the Amphisbatinae being treated: pp.
    [Show full text]
  • Eriogonum Visheri A
    Eriogonum visheri A. Nelson (Visher’s buckwheat): A Technical Conservation Assessment Prepared for the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region, Species Conservation Project December 18, 2006 Juanita A. R. Ladyman, Ph.D. JnJ Associates LLC 6760 S. Kit Carson Cir E. Centennial, CO 80122 Peer Review Administered by Center for Plant Conservation Ladyman, J.A.R. (2006, December 18). Eriogonum visheri A. Nelson (Visher’s buckwheat): a technical conservation assessment. [Online]. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region. Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/r2/ projects/scp/assessments/eriogonumvisheri.pdf [date of access]. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The time spent and help given by all the people and institutions listed in the reference section are gratefully acknowledged. I would also like to thank the North Dakota Parks and Recreation Department, in particular Christine Dirk, and the South Dakota Natural Heritage Program, in particular David Ode, for their generosity in making their records, reports, and photographs available. I thank the Montana Natural Heritage Program, particularly Martin Miller, Mark Gabel of the Black Hills University Herbarium, Robert Tatina of the Dakota Wesleyan University, Christine Niezgoda of the Field Museum of Natural History, Carrie Kiel Academy of Natural Sciences, Dave Dyer of the University of Montana Herbarium, Caleb Morse of the R.L. McGregor Herbarium, Robert Kaul of the C. E. Bessey Herbarium, John La Duke of the University of North Dakota Herbarium, Joe Washington of the Dakota National Grasslands, and Doug Sargent of the Buffalo Gap National Grasslands - Region 2, for the information they provided. I also appreciate the access to files and assistance given to me by Andrew Kratz, Region 2 USDA Forest Service, and Chuck Davis, U.S.
    [Show full text]