Panther Ridge Wildlife Habitat Enhancement Project Environmental Assessment

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Panther Ridge Wildlife Habitat Enhancement Project Environmental Assessment United States Department of Agriculture Panther Ridge Wildlife Habitat Enhancement Project Environmental Assessment Forest Service Monongahela National Forest Marlinton-White Sulphur Ranger District April 2019 Panther Ridge Wildlife Habitat Enhancement Project Environmental Assessment For More Information Contact: Jim McCormick Project Lead, District Wildlife Biologist Marlinton-White Sulphur Ranger District Monongahela National Forest 1079 Main Street E. White Sulphur Springs, WV 24986 Phone: 304-799-4334 Email: [email protected] USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender. Panther Ridge Wildlife Habitat Enhancement Project Environmental Assessment Introduction The Marlinton-White Sulphur Ranger District of the Monongahela National Forest has developed a proposal to improve forest health and wildlife habitat for a 12,599-acre project area. Proposed activities include commercial and noncommercial vegetation management activities, prescribed fire, planting of native species, road maintenance and rerouting, watershed restoration activities, creation of water sources, and other wildlife habitat enhancements. (See the Vicinity Map on the cover page of this document.) Proposed Project Location The project area is located approximately 7 miles east of Falling Springs on County Route 11 with the following project boundaries: Greenbrier River to the west, Little Creek to the east, Hopkins Knob to the south, and Spice Run Wilderness to the north. Need for the Proposal There is a need to address the current lack of habitat diversity, dense and closed canopy forests, loss of American chestnut, spread of nonnative invasive species, and degraded watershed conditions on the Marlinton-White Sulphur Ranger District to meet Forest Plan desired conditions (Monongahela National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan, 2006, as amended). The project area falls in the center of cerulean warbler breeding range, but does not provide ideal habitat for this and many other species. The purpose of this project is to restore and enhance wildlife habitat in the project area. Lack of Habitat Diversity While mature forests are an important component of quality wildlife habitat, having an extensive amount of forest in this age class results in less food and cover for wildlife than that found in a young forest. Table 1 shows forest stand age class distribution in the project area, and the need for creating early successional habitat to meet Forest Plan desired conditions. Early successional habitat has declined substantially in the project area and throughout North America over the last century. This habitat is essential for a variety of animals from small reptiles to large mammals. Many birds rely on this habitat, including species that breed and nest in mature woods. Some of the animals that need early successional habitat include Eastern whip-poor-will, bobcat, box turtle, green snake, ruffed grouse, American woodcock, White-tailed deer, wild turkey, and a broad range of songbirds. Table 1. Current age class distribution in the project area compared to Forest Plan desired conditions Forest Plan Desired Current Condition in the Age Class Condition Project Area Late Successional (>120 years) 5 to 10 percent 16.6 percent Mid to Late-Successional Habitat (80 to 24 to 40 percent 64.2 percent 119 years) Mid-Successional (40 to 79 years) 24 to 40 percent 12.7 percent Early and Early-Mid-Successional Habitat 12 to 20 percent 4.8 percent Combined (0 to 39 years) Early-Successional Habitat (0 to 19 years) 12 to 20 percent 1.7 percent Following a disturbance, such as timber harvesting or non-commercial wildlife habitat projects, the forest resets back to early stages of development. Additional sunlight reaches the forest floor and provides a 1 Panther Ridge Wildlife Habitat Enhancement Project Environmental Assessment flush of herbaceous growth, which creates foraging habitat for wildlife. In addition, tree species begin to re-establish by either seed stored in the soil, or stump or root sprouting. Because of the available sunlight tree species, like oaks and hickory, which need open conditions can flourish. As the new forest continues to develop, high stem densities provide wildlife escape cover from predators, and additional food sources. Early successional habitat is maintained by regular disturbance such as wind, fire, clear-cutting, or beaver activity. As the forest ages, the canopy closes, reducing the amount of sunlight reaching the forest floor. As a result, natural thinning begins as young trees out-compete each other for space, sunlight, and nutrients. With fewer tree stems, there is less escape cover for wildlife and less herbaceous vegetation for foraging. Second growth forests like those found throughout the project area lack the complex forest structure favored by wildlife, including cerulean warblers, Kentucky warblers, and hooded warblers. While cerulean warblers need large blocks of mature forests, they prefer environments with more open canopies and gaps that allow sunlight to reach the forest floor. They are unlikely to use the densely packed trees and closed canopies that are common throughout much of the project area. Range-wide cerulean warbler populations have decreased by about 70 percent (Figure 1) leading to their designation as a species of national conservation concern by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. These losses are primarily related to the loss and reduced suitability of habitat on breeding, migration, and wintering grounds. Figure 1. Cerulean warbler population decline modeled using Breeding Bird Survey data from 1966-2006 (adapted from Cerulean Warbler Management Guidelines, 2013) Within the mature forests in the project area, a key tree species is missing. Before the early 1900s, American chestnuts were the predominant tree species in the eastern forest. They were extremely important for wildlife, providing food for bears and much of the fall mast for species such as white-tailed deer and wild turkey. One American chestnut tree could produce as many as 6,000 chestnuts each year, and its profusion of blooms supported bees and other pollinators. Because chestnuts bloom relatively late in the spring, their chestnut crop was not hit by late frosts that often diminish the mast of oaks and hickories. Chestnuts were high in fiber, vitamin C, protein, and carbohydrates, yet low in fat, making them important for wildlife. Today, more than 100 years after a blight reduced this tree from its 2 Panther Ridge Wildlife Habitat Enhancement Project Environmental Assessment dominance on the landscape to an occasional understory shrub, scientists have developed a more blight- resistant tree that would be planted in the project area to help restore this important tree species in its original range. Habitat within the project area has been further degraded by the presence of several unwanted nonnative invasive plants1. Invasive plants reduce the number and variety of forest wildlife, primarily by reducing the availability of food and cover. Some plants, such as tree of heaven and garlic mustard, release chemicals through their roots that keep native plants (including tree seedlings) from growing. A diversity of native vegetation supports a much greater variety of wildlife species than nonnative invasive plants. Stream and riparian conditions within the project area are, in places, inconsistent with a healthy functioning ecosystem. Unstable banks, low levels of large woody material, and high sediment loads contribute to a general lack of habitat complexity in streams. In many places, streams within the project area have eroded over time and cut down into the channel. Deep, vertical stream banks and increased erosion greatly reduce fish habitat. Aquatic habitat in the project area is being impacted by undersized culverts at road-stream intersections that block the passage of fish and other species. Many undersized culverts create unnaturally powerful outflow and extreme erosion on the downstream side (fire hose effect). Over time, this can have a major impact on fish populations and overall stream health. Forest Plan Direction The Panther Ridge project area falls within Forest Plan management prescription 6.1, which emphasizes: • Use of vegetation management to enhance the variety of wildlife habitat on the forest; • Favoring tree species and forest communities that are beneficial to wildlife; • Increasing stand age class distribution over current conditions; and • Active restoration of pine-oak and oak-hickory communities. The desired future condition and goals for this project under management prescription 6.1 are to: • Enhance diversity of wildlife habitat by managing for a variety of vegetation species, types, and age classes; • Maintain, restore, or enhance the oak component within oak-pine, oak-hickory communities to provide long term mast supplies, sustainable timber, and habitat diversity; and • Create artificial water sources as needed in conjunction with other resource activities 1 Throughout this report the terms “nonnative invasive plants” and “invasive plants” are used as synonyms for nonnative invasive plants. 3 Panther Ridge Wildlife Habitat Enhancement Project Environmental Assessment Proposed Action and Alternatives The following alternatives were considered: Proposed Action To achieve the purpose and need, in accordance with Forest Plan direction and desired conditions, the proposed action would provide a diversity of wildlife habitat in the project area, including enhancing habitat for migratory songbirds,
Recommended publications
  • Land Areas of the National Forest System, As of September 30, 2019
    United States Department of Agriculture Land Areas of the National Forest System As of September 30, 2019 Forest Service WO Lands FS-383 November 2019 Metric Equivalents When you know: Multiply by: To fnd: Inches (in) 2.54 Centimeters Feet (ft) 0.305 Meters Miles (mi) 1.609 Kilometers Acres (ac) 0.405 Hectares Square feet (ft2) 0.0929 Square meters Yards (yd) 0.914 Meters Square miles (mi2) 2.59 Square kilometers Pounds (lb) 0.454 Kilograms United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Land Areas of the WO, Lands National Forest FS-383 System November 2019 As of September 30, 2019 Published by: USDA Forest Service 1400 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20250-0003 Website: https://www.fs.fed.us/land/staff/lar-index.shtml Cover Photo: Mt. Hood, Mt. Hood National Forest, Oregon Courtesy of: Susan Ruzicka USDA Forest Service WO Lands and Realty Management Statistics are current as of: 10/17/2019 The National Forest System (NFS) is comprised of: 154 National Forests 58 Purchase Units 20 National Grasslands 7 Land Utilization Projects 17 Research and Experimental Areas 28 Other Areas NFS lands are found in 43 States as well as Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands. TOTAL NFS ACRES = 192,994,068 NFS lands are organized into: 9 Forest Service Regions 112 Administrative Forest or Forest-level units 503 Ranger District or District-level units The Forest Service administers 149 Wild and Scenic Rivers in 23 States and 456 National Wilderness Areas in 39 States. The Forest Service also administers several other types of nationally designated
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Small Vessel General Permit
    ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES, COASTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PUBLIC NOTICE The United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 W. Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois has requested a determination from the Illinois Department of Natural Resources if their Vessel General Permit (VGP) and Small Vessel General Permit (sVGP) are consistent with the enforceable policies of the Illinois Coastal Management Program (ICMP). VGP regulates discharges incidental to the normal operation of commercial vessels and non-recreational vessels greater than or equal to 79 ft. in length. sVGP regulates discharges incidental to the normal operation of commercial vessels and non- recreational vessels less than 79 ft. in length. VGP and sVGP can be viewed in their entirety at the ICMP web site http://www.dnr.illinois.gov/cmp/Pages/CMPFederalConsistencyRegister.aspx Inquiries concerning this request may be directed to Jim Casey of the Department’s Chicago Office at (312) 793-5947 or [email protected]. You are invited to send written comments regarding this consistency request to the Michael A. Bilandic Building, 160 N. LaSalle Street, Suite S-703, Chicago, Illinois 60601. All comments claiming the proposed actions would not meet federal consistency must cite the state law or laws and how they would be violated. All comments must be received by July 19, 2012. Proposed Small Vessel General Permit (sVGP) United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) SMALL VESSEL GENERAL PERMIT FOR DISCHARGES INCIDENTAL TO THE NORMAL OPERATION OF VESSELS LESS THAN 79 FEET (sVGP) AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE UNDER THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM In compliance with the provisions of the Clean Water Act, as amended (33 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Table 7 - National Wilderness Areas by State
    Table 7 - National Wilderness Areas by State * Unit is in two or more States ** Acres estimated pending final boundary determination + Special Area that is part of a proclaimed National Forest State National Wilderness Area NFS Other Total Unit Name Acreage Acreage Acreage Alabama Cheaha Wilderness Talladega National Forest 7,400 0 7,400 Dugger Mountain Wilderness** Talladega National Forest 9,048 0 9,048 Sipsey Wilderness William B. Bankhead National Forest 25,770 83 25,853 Alabama Totals 42,218 83 42,301 Alaska Chuck River Wilderness 74,876 520 75,396 Coronation Island Wilderness Tongass National Forest 19,118 0 19,118 Endicott River Wilderness Tongass National Forest 98,396 0 98,396 Karta River Wilderness Tongass National Forest 39,917 7 39,924 Kootznoowoo Wilderness Tongass National Forest 979,079 21,741 1,000,820 FS-administered, outside NFS bdy 0 654 654 Kuiu Wilderness Tongass National Forest 60,183 15 60,198 Maurille Islands Wilderness Tongass National Forest 4,814 0 4,814 Misty Fiords National Monument Wilderness Tongass National Forest 2,144,010 235 2,144,245 FS-administered, outside NFS bdy 0 15 15 Petersburg Creek-Duncan Salt Chuck Wilderness Tongass National Forest 46,758 0 46,758 Pleasant/Lemusurier/Inian Islands Wilderness Tongass National Forest 23,083 41 23,124 FS-administered, outside NFS bdy 0 15 15 Russell Fjord Wilderness Tongass National Forest 348,626 63 348,689 South Baranof Wilderness Tongass National Forest 315,833 0 315,833 South Etolin Wilderness Tongass National Forest 82,593 834 83,427 Refresh Date: 10/14/2017
    [Show full text]
  • Public Law 111-11
    PUBLIC LAW 111–11—MAR. 30, 2009 123 STAT. 991 Public Law 111–11 111th Congress An Act To designate certain land as components of the National Wilderness Preservation System, to authorize certain programs and activities in the Department of the Mar. 30, 2009 Interior and the Department of Agriculture, and for other purposes. [H.R. 146] Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, Omnibus Public Land SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; TABLE OF CONTENTS. Management Act (a) SHORT TITLE.—This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Omnibus of 2009. Public Land Management Act of 2009’’. 16 USC 1 note. (b) TABLE OF CONTENTS.—The table of contents of this Act is as follows: Sec. 1. Short title; table of contents. TITLE I—ADDITIONS TO THE NATIONAL WILDERNESS PRESERVATION SYSTEM Subtitle A—Wild Monongahela Wilderness Sec. 1001. Designation of wilderness, Monongahela National Forest, West Virginia. Sec. 1002. Boundary adjustment, Laurel Fork South Wilderness, Monongahela Na­ tional Forest. Sec. 1003. Monongahela National Forest boundary confirmation. Sec. 1004. Enhanced Trail Opportunities. Subtitle B—Virginia Ridge and Valley Wilderness Sec. 1101. Definitions. Sec. 1102. Designation of additional National Forest System land in Jefferson Na­ tional Forest as wilderness or a wilderness study area. Sec. 1103. Designation of Kimberling Creek Potential Wilderness Area, Jefferson National Forest, Virginia. Sec. 1104. Seng Mountain and Bear Creek Scenic Areas, Jefferson National Forest, Virginia. Sec. 1105. Trail plan and development. Sec. 1106. Maps and boundary descriptions. Sec. 1107. Effective date. Subtitle C—Mt. Hood Wilderness, Oregon Sec.
    [Show full text]
  • Calendar No. 823
    Calendar No. 823 110TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! 2d Session SENATE 110–391 WILD MONONGAHELA ACT: A NATIONAL LEGACY FOR WEST VIRGINIA’S SPECIAL PLACES JUNE 16, 2008.—Ordered to be printed Mr. BINGAMAN, from the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, submitted the following R E P O R T [To accompany H.R. 5151] The Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, to which was referred the Act (H.R. 5151) to designate as wilderness additional National Forest System lands in the Monongahela National Forest in the State of West Virginia, and for other purposes, having con- sidered the same, reports favorably thereon with amendments and recommends that the Act, as amended, do pass. The amendments are as follows: 1. On page 6, strike lines 10 through 12 and insert the following: ‘‘1131 et seq.).’’ 2. On page 6, line 15, insert ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—’’ before ‘‘The boundary’’. 3. On page 6, between lines 23 and 24, insert the following: (b) LAND AND WATER CONSERVATION FUND.—For the purposes of section 7 of the Land and Water Conservation Fund Act of 1965 (16 U.S.C. 460l–9), the boundaries of the Monongahela National For- est, as confirmed by subsection (a), shall be considered to be the boundaries of the Monongahela National Forest as of January 1, 1965. PURPOSE The purpose of H.R. 5151 is to designate as wilderness additional National Forest System land in the Monongahela National Forest in the State of West Virginia, to adjust certain boundaries, and to enhance non-motorized recreational trail opportunities. 69–010 VerDate Aug 31 2005 04:41 Jun 18, 2008 Jkt 069010 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6659 Sfmt 6602 E:\HR\OC\SR391.XXX SR391 smartinez on PROD1PC64 with REPORTS 2 BACKGROUND AND NEED The Monongahela National Forest is composed of over 919,000 acres of Federal land in 10 counties located in the eastern portion of West Virginia.
    [Show full text]
  • The Highlands Voice
    West Virginia Highlands Conservancy PO. Box 306 Non-Profit Org. Charleston, WV 25321 U.S. Postage PAID Permit No. 2831 Charleston, WV The Highlands Voice Since 1967, The Monthly Publication of the West Virginia Highlands Conservancy Volume 51 No. 8 August, 2018 We Have Wilderness; Now We Need to By George E. Beetham Jr.Work to Keep It Wilderness On October 13, 1746, Thomas Lewis, a surveyor from the the time we entered the swamp I did not see a plane big Shenandoah Valley of Virginia was a member of a survey team enough for a man to lie on or horse to stand…” headed by Peter Jefferson, father of Thomas. The party’s mission Leaving the plateau, he noted in his journal, was to survey the boundaries of Lord Fairfax’s large estate. Near “Never was any poor creature in such a condition as the ridgeline of Allegheny Mountain they encountered a 16-foot high we were in, nor ever was a criminal more glad by having cliff. They managed to get to the top. What they found surprised made his escape out of prison as we were to get rid of them. It was a wide plateau, not a standard ridgeline. There were those accursed laurels.” flat rocks and a marsh. A little more than a hundred years later, not much had Farther across the plateau they encountered: changed. David Hunter Strother, who wrote under the pen name “Laurel and Ivy as thick as they can grow whose Porte Crayon (French for pencil case), wrote in 1852: branches growing of an extraordinary length are so well “In Randolph County, Virginia, is a tract of country woven together that without cutting it away it would be containing from seven to nine hundred square miles, impossible to force through them … from the beginning of entirely uninhabited, and so savage and inaccessible that it (More on p.
    [Show full text]
  • Snap Shots a Snap Shot of Last Year!
    2016 ANNUAL REPORT Snap Shots A snap shot of last year! © Kent Mason Simple Gifts, and Lasting Ones I pulled up to a Starbucks drive-thru one evening to fuel myself for a road trip to a conservation site. As I fumbled for cash, the double windows opened and the cheerful barista leaned forward with my beverage. “It’s already paid for, by the person who was in front of you,” she said. Tail lights were leaving the lane, turning away from my destination; no chance to thank this thoughtful person. “OK, I’ll pay for the person behind me,” I said. “Nobody else is in line,” she responded. “But try it some other time.” That random anonymous act of ACCREDITATION kindness, and the coffee, warmed me for the rest of the drive. The West Virginia Land Trust has been similarly warmed this year by generous ACHIEVEMENT contributions from people we don’t know personally – and one who is totally anonymous – who have called us up to say that they have heard of our work and want to help After a year of rigorous conserve West Virginia’s Special Places by directing portions of their retirement accounts to us. We are humbled! And if that anonymous donor whose bank wired us retirement preparation and review, funds, but would not reveal the source, is reading this: Know that we’re thankful. To all the West Virginia Land who have given: We aim to continue to make you proud of what you are making possible in our beloved West Virginia hills. Trust was awarded This annual report recaps some of the highlights from 2016 that you, our supporters, national accreditation have accomplished with us.
    [Show full text]
  • Jury Says Timbering, Mining Contributed to Flooding
    West Virginia Highlands Conservancy P. O. Box 306 Charleston, WV 25321 Non-Profit Org. U.S. Postage PAID Permit No. 2831 Charleston, WV The Highlands Voice The Monthly publication of the West Virginia Highlands Conservancy Volume 38 Number 5 May, 20065 JURY SAYS TIMBERING, MINING CONTRIBUTED TO FLOODING A jury in Raleigh County, West Virginia, has reports of West Virginia Division of Forestry and West fendants did or didn’t do. decided that logging and mining were responsible for at Virginia Department of Environmental Protection of the The jury considered all this and, all was said least part of the flooding that struck southern West Vir- mines and timbering operations. and done, decided that the defendants had made an ginia in July, 2001. This was the first round of litigation unreasonable use of their land and that mining and tim- over the relationship between the 2001 floods in south- bering had contributed to the flooding. ern West Virginia and mining or logging This trial focused only on liability, whether the At issue was whether the companies made a defendants caused the problem and had legal responsi- reasonable use of their land. The jury decided that they bility for it. A later trial will determine the damages to had not. The jury also decided that the timbering and which each of the plaintiffs is entitled. mining made a significant contribution to the flooding. This trial focused only on one area, known in The trial evolved into a battle of the experts. the trial as the Mullens and Oceana subwatershed. The Experts in forestry and in the construction of valley fills verdict allows about 500 residents of that watershed to testified on behalf of the defendants.
    [Show full text]
  • Land Areas of the National Forest System
    United States Department of Agriculture Land Areas of the National Forest System As of September 30, 2020 Forest Service WO Lands FS–383 November 2020 Metric Equivalents When you know: Multiply by: To find: Inches (in) 2.54 Centimeters (cm) Feet (ft) 0.305 Meters (m) Miles (mi) 1.609 Kilometers (km) Acres (ac) 0.405 Hectares (ha) Square feet (ft2) 0.0929 Square meters (m2) Yards (yd) 0.914 Meters (m) Square miles (mi2) 2.59 Square kilometers (km2) Pounds (lb) 0.454 Kilograms (kg) United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Land Areas of the WO, Lands National Forest FS–383 System November 2020 As of September 30, 2020 USDA Forest Service 1400 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20250–0003 Website: https://www.fs.fed.us/land/staff/lar-index.shtml Cover photo: Mount Ogden, Uinta-Wasatch-Cache National Forest, Utah Photo by Eric Greenwood, USDA Forest Service, Region 4, Recreation Lands & Minerals i Statistics are current as of: 10/19/2020 The National Forest System (NFS) is comprised of: 154 National Forests 58 Purchase Units 20 National Grasslands 7 Land Utilization Projects 17 Research and Experimental Areas 28 Other Areas NFS lands are found in 43 States as well as Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands. TOTAL NFS ACRES = 193,041,851 NFS lands are organized into: 9 Forest Service Regions 112 Administrative Forest or Forest-level units 503 Ranger District or District-level units The Forest Service, an agency of the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), administers 134 Wild and Scenic Rivers in 23 States and 449 National Wilderness Areas in 39 States.
    [Show full text]
  • 2012 YEARBOOK West Virginia Stream Partners Program
    2012 West Virginia Stream Partners Program YEARBOOK West Virginia Stream Partners Program is a cooperative effort of the Department of Environmental Protection, the Division of Forestry, the Division of Natural Resources and the West Virginia Conservation Agency. Purpose To support community groups that are dedicated to assuring that their local rivers and streams are safe for: swimming, fishing, recreation, public and commercial purposes and provide habitat for plant and animal life. How to get started $5,000 seed grants are available each year to applicants that are willing to organize community members to plan and complete a watershed improvement project. Applications are available online at www.wvca.us/stream.cfm. Basin Coordinators Four regional basin coordinators are available to: Help complete applications Advise on projects with agency and assist with partnership building Get your community involved by helping to organize and facilitate meetings The Partners In January of 2012 the West Virginia Stream Partners Program awarded 20 local watershed associations grants of up to $5,000. These watershed volunteers spent the year coordinating their goals with those of state and federal agencies, local government and watershed stakeholders to implement projects that range from educational field days to on the ground stream restoration. Each of these organizations is very unique. Each has its own set of skills, abilities and obstacles. The Stream Partners Program provides the volunteers with a small financial resource, technical support, and organizational skills. This annual yearbook highlights each association’s individuality and successes. The West Virginia Stream Partners Program is truly a state-wide cooperative effort. Program support is provided by staff from each of the four/five partner agencies and the grant fund is an annual legislative appropriation.
    [Show full text]
  • Office of Surface Mining Ready to Protect Streams–Or Not
    Volume 42, Number 5 May, 2009 And Now for OSM OFFICE OF SURFACE MINING READY TO PROTECT STREAMS–OR NOT By Cindy Rank Last month we were pleased to note that Environmental Protec- On the other hand neither Salazar’s official statement nor his tion Agency might be finding religion once again. The comments during the press conference offered any clear agency basically put on hold some pending 404 fill permits way forward or any concrete commitment about how OSM by writing letters to the Army Corps of Engineers saying that would enforce the 1983 rule if the court approved with- more had to be done, that science shows problems exist drawing the Bush rule. that may not be addressed by the proposed permits, and Joan Mulhern, senior legislative counsel for that EPA wanted to take a closer look. Earthjustice, listened to the press conference and had this On April 27, 2009 the Office of Surface Mining Rec- to say. “Secretary Salazar’s comments at the press con- lamation and Enforcement (OSM[RE]) appeared to find new ference lacked such a commitment; he made it sound as life as well when Department of the Interior (DOI) Secretary if this action would return the situation to the status quo Ken Salazar announced his intention to withdraw the Bush before the Bush 11th hour change to the stream buffer administration’s 11th hour Stream Buffer Zone Rule. zone rule. But the history of the stream buffer zone rule is —— Cause for celebration, right ? ….Or is it ? …. It that it hasn’t been enforced.
    [Show full text]
  • Monongahela National Forest
    Monongahela National Forest Administrative Correction 10 September 20, 2010 Changes to Management Prescriptions Due to Congressional Wilderness Designations Under the 2000 Planning Rule (36 CFR 219.31), the following administrative corrections and additions may be made at any time, are not plan amendments or revisions, and do not require public notice or the preparation of an environmental document under Forest Service NEPA procedures: (1) Corrections and updates of data and maps; (2) Updates to activity lists and schedules as required by § 219.30(d)(1)-(6); (3) Corrections of typographical errors or other non-substantive changes; and (4) Changes in monitoring methods other than those required in a monitoring strategy. The following corrections are due to congressional wilderness designations that occurred in the Wild Monongahela Wilderness Act (Public Law 111-11) of 2009. The designations resulted in a change in Management Prescription acres on the Forest. An estimated 37,648 acres formerly in Management Prescription 5.1 (Recommended Wilderness) or Management Prescription 6.2 (Backcountry Recreation) became Management Prescription 5.0, Designated Wilderness. CORRECTIONS Forest Plan Chapter III, page III-17 Area Description, First Sentence: The following five areas are assigned to this prescription. Change to: The following eight areas are assigned to this prescription. Rationale for Change: There are now eight designated Wildernesses on the Forest due to Public Law 111-11, The Wild Monongahela Wilderness Act of 2009. Area Description,
    [Show full text]