Use This As the Cover Page to Fax Corrections to Your Chapter Date: TO

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Use This As the Cover Page to Fax Corrections to Your Chapter Date: TO 12 The Malverns, Cherry Orchard Lane, Salisbury SP2 7JG, U.K. Telephone: +44(0)1722 414282 Facsimile: +44(0)1722 414288 email: [email protected] website: www.techset.co.uk Use this as the cover page to fax corrections to your chapter Date: TO: Paul Beaney fax: 44(0) 1722 414288 email: [email protected] FROM: ........................................................... BOOK TITLE: Sigel: Metal Ions in Biological Systems, Volume 43 (ISBN 0-0000-0000-0) CHAPTER NUMBER: 07 Author: Please list page numbers of pages requiring correction, and record answers to queries and any special instructions here: Author: Please indicate the preferred mailing address for your complimentary copy of the finished book and special promotions or discounts reserved for Dekker authors. International Publishing Services with offices in Salisbury, London & Chennai Registered in England, no. 2420700 0000-0-Sigel-ch07_R1_121004 1 2 3 4 5 7 6 7 8 Iron, Phytoplankton Growth, 9 10 and the Carbon Cycle 11 12 13 14 Joseph H. Street and Adina Paytan 15 Department of Geological and Environmental Sciences, Braun Hall, 16 Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA 17 18 19 20 21 1. Iron, an Essential Nutrient for Marine Organisms 154 22 1.1. Iron Function in Cells 154 23 1.2. Cellular Uptake Mechanisms 155 24 1.3. Chemical and Physical Limits on Uptake Rates 156 25 1.4. Expression of Stress 157 26 2. Iron Chemistry in Seawater 158 27 2.1. Chemical Forms 158 28 2.2. Speciation and Redox Chemistry 159 29 2.3. Interaction with Organic Compounds 159 30 31 3. Iron Distribution and Cycling in the Ocean 160 32 3.1. External Iron Sources 160 33 3.1.1. Atmospheric Dust Deposition 160 34 3.1.2. River Input 162 35 3.1.3. Hydrothermal Sources 163 36 3.1.4. Mobilization in Sediments 163 37 3.2. Iron Cycling in the Ocean 164 38 3.2.1. Upwelling and Advection 164 39 3.2.2. Biological Cycling, Export, and Regeneration 165 40 3.2.3. Particle Scavenging 166 41 3.3. Patterns in the Distribution of Iron in the Ocean 166 42 3.3.1. Dissolved Iron in the Open Ocean 167 43 153 44 0000-0-Sigel-ch07_R1_121004 154 Street and Paytan 45 3.3.2. Dissolved Iron in the Coastal Ocean, Shallow 46 Seas, and Semi-enclosed Basins 169 47 3.3.3. Particulate Iron 169 48 3.3.4. Suboxic/Anoxic Zones 169 49 4. Iron Limitation of Marine Primary Productivity and Control on 50 Ecosystem Structure 170 51 4.1. Evidence for the Role of Iron in Regulating Productivity 52 in High Nutrient Low Chlorophyll Regions 170 53 4.1.1. Bottle Incubation Experiments 171 54 4.1.2. Mesoscale Enrichment Experiments 173 55 4.1.3. Evidence of Iron Limitation from Other Regions 176 56 4.2. Interaction of Iron with Other Limiting Factors 177 57 4.3. Carbon Export and Iron Fertilization 180 58 5. The Role of Iron in Regulating Atmospheric CO2 180 59 5.1. The Iron Hypothesis 180 60 5.2. Changes in Dust Input and Productivity in Glacial Periods 181 61 5.3. Consequences for Atmospheric CO2 and Global Climate 182 62 6. Summary and Conclusions 183 63 64 Acknowledgments 184 65 Abbreviations 184 66 References 185 67 68 69 70 71 72 1. IRON, AN ESSENTIAL NUTRIENT FOR MARINE ORGANISMS 73 74 1.1. Iron Function in Cells 75 Iron is an essential nutrient supporting the growth and metabolism of marine 76 organisms. Iron-bearing molecules are involved in photosynthetic and respiratory 77 electron transport, nitrate and nitrite reduction, N2-fixation, sulfate reduction, 78 and, as enzyme components, in the detoxification of reactive oxygen species 2 79 such as O2 and H2O2 [1]. 80 Relative to other nutrients, iron is disproportionately utilized in cell metab- 81 olism over cell structure. As a result, cellular Fe : C ratios tend to vary with Fe 82 availability (and, by extension, metabolic rate), in contrast to the more or less 83 fixed ratios of C : N : P measured in marine phytoplankton [2,3]. Fe : C ratios 84 measured in pelagic phytoplankton and marine particulate matter range from 85 1 : 3000 to 1 : 500,000 [3–7]. This variation in cellular Fe content is intrinsic to 86 different classes of phytoplankton as has been shown in culture experiments 87 [8]. In particular, because iron is present in the catalytic centers of nitrate- and 88 nitrite-reductase enzymes, in reducing equivalent molecules (NADPH, ferredoxin) and in the N2-fixing enzyme nitrogenase, organisms assimilating 0000-0-Sigel-ch07_R1_121004 Iron, Phytoplankton Growth, and Carbon Cycle 155 89 nitrate as a nitrogen source or fixing N2 from the atmosphere require much more 90 cellular iron to support growth than those utilizing reduced nitrogen species 91 [1,9–12]. 92 93 94 1.2. Cellular Uptake Mechanisms 95 By almost any measure, iron is vanishingly scarce in seawater, and much of the 96 iron that is present exists in forms not directly accessible to organisms (Sections 2 97 and 3). Marine phytoplankton are for the most part restricted to the uptake of dis- 98 solved Fe species although Fe can be solubilized from particles or colloids. 99 Marine phytoplankton have evolved several strategies for efficiently acquiring 100 iron and transporting it across the hydrophobic, semi-impermeable lipid bilayer 101 membrane surrounding most cells. The general mechanism involves the use of 102 cell-regulated membrane transport proteins (“transporters”), but prokaryotic 103 and eukaryotic cells have each developed distinct variations on this approach. 104 Prokaryotic microorganisms, including marine phototrophic and hetero- 105 trophic bacteria, are known to acquire Fe(III) by means of siderophore-based 106 transport systems. In these systems, cells under Fe stress synthesize and 107 release low-mass, high-affinity Fe(III)-chelating molecules (“siderophores”) 108 into the surrounding seawater, where they capture and solubilize otherwise una- 109 vailable Fe species (e.g., oxide minerals, particle-bound, organic complexes) 110 [13–16]. The Fe-siderophore chelates are then taken up via chelate-specific 111 transporters, which move the complex across the membrane and release Fe 112 inside the cell via reduction to Fe(II) or degradation of the siderophore itself. 113 Seawater surveys indicated that a large fraction of the bacteria were capable of 114 producing strong Fe-binding chelators (probably siderophores) [17–20]. Sidero- 115 phore transport systems, sometimes utilizing novel chelating agents, have been 116 described in many cyanobacteria [11,21,22] (Fig. 1). F1; Q1 117 In contrast to marine bacteria, there is little evidence for the production of 118 siderophores by eukaryotic marine phytoplankton [23,24]. Rather, eukaryotes 119 appear to utilize transporters that directly capture dissolved inorganic iron at 120 the cell membrane. Experiments with two diatoms and a coccolithophore 121 found that for these organisms Fe uptake depends on the concentration of 122 labile inorganic Fe and is independent of the concentration of total iron 123 [5,23,25]. Tracer experiments have shown that phytoplankton will make use of 124 iron bound to siderophores or other organic ligands only after photo- or biologi- 125 cally-mediated dissociation from the ligand [15]. It is likely that the transporters 126 involved in Fe uptake are transmembrane proteins, powered by ATP or cross- 127 membrane electrochemical gradients, and controlled by a DNA switch that 128 represses gene transcription and hence synthesis of transport proteins when 129 intracellular Fe concentrations become elevated [1,25,26]. 130 Certain classes of photosynthetic protozoan marine algae are able to 131 directly ingest cells or abiotic particles as supplementary sources of fixed 132 carbon and essential nutrients, including the bulk of the iron required to support photosynthesis and respiration [27]. These “mixotrophic” organisms 0000-0-Sigel-ch07_R1_121004 156 Street and Paytan 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 Figure 1 (A) Heme, one of several iron-bearing porphyrin compounds, occurring in 162 cytochromes and other metabolic proteins in marine microorganisms; (B) Alterobactin, 163 a siderophore produced by marine bacteria. Reproduced from Ref. [283] by courtesy of 164 the American Society of Limnology and Oceanography; (C) Chelation of Fe3þ by a hydro- 165 xamate siderophore. Adapted from Ref. [284] by courtesy of Marcel Dekker, Inc. 166 167 have been shown to be able to sustain moderate growth rates (35–70% of 168 maximum) using only ingested mineral colloids as Fe sources in seawater that 169 has been artificially depleted in dissolved iron [28]. 170 171 172 173 1.3. Chemical and Physical Limits on Uptake Rates 174 Iron uptake rates for most phytoplankton species appear to be limited by the rate 175 of cross-membrane transport, itself a function of ligand exchange kinetics and the 176 amount of space available on the outer cell membrane for transporter proteins 0000-0-Sigel-ch07_R1_121004 Iron, Phytoplankton Growth, and Carbon Cycle 157 177 [1,23,29]. This conclusion is born out by experiments with coastal diatoms and 178 dinoflagellates of a range of cell sizes (3.5–32 mm), which show that cell 179 surface- and volume-normalized Fe uptake rates, as well as specific growth 180 rates, flatten out with increasing dissolved Fe concentrations. Although part of 181 this effect may have resulted from Fe-hydroxide precipitation at high Fe concen- 182 trations, cell surface normalized Fe uptake was similar for all species, regardless 183 of size, consistent with the notion of uptake rates near their physical and chemical 184 limits [30]. This finding was replicated in a comparison of an oceanic diatom 185 (Thalassiosira oceanica) with a related coastal diatom (T.
Recommended publications
  • Effects of the Filter-Feeding Benthic Bivalve Corbicula Fluminea
    water Article Effects of the Filter-Feeding Benthic Bivalve Corbicula fluminea on Plankton Community and Water Quality in Aquatic Ecosystems: A Mesocosm Study Yuqin Rong 1,2, Yali Tang 1,2,† , Lijuan Ren 1,2, William D Taylor 3 , Vladimir Razlutskij 4, Luigi Naselli-Flores 5 , Zhengwen Liu 1,6,7,* and Xiufeng Zhang 1,2,* 1 Department of Ecology and Institute of Hydrobiology, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China; [email protected] (Y.R.); [email protected] (Y.T.); [email protected] (L.R.) 2 Engineering Research Center of Tropical and Subtropical Aquatic Ecological Engineering, Ministry of Education, Guangzhou 510632, China 3 Department of Biology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada; [email protected] 4 State Scientific and Production Amalgamation Scientific-Practical Center of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus for Biological Resources, 220072 Minsk, Belarus; [email protected] 5 Department STEBICEF, University of Palermo, 90123 Palermo, Italy; [email protected] 6 Sino-Danish Centre for Education and Research (SDC), Beijing 100070, China 7 State Key Laboratory of Lake Science and Environment, Institute of Geography and Limnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China * Correspondence: [email protected] (Z.L.); [email protected] (X.Z.) † The author contributed equally to this work. Abstract: The influence of filter-feeding bivalves on plankton communities, nutrients, and water Citation: Rong, Y.; Tang, Y.; Ren, L.; quality in a given aquatic ecosystem is so profound that they can be considered ecosystem engineers. Taylor, W.D; Razlutskij, V.; In a 70-day mesocosm experiment, we tested the hypothesis that Corbicula fluminea would change Naselli-Flores, L.; Liu, Z.; Zhang, X.
    [Show full text]
  • The Plankton Lifeform Extraction Tool: a Digital Tool to Increase The
    Discussions https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2021-171 Earth System Preprint. Discussion started: 21 July 2021 Science c Author(s) 2021. CC BY 4.0 License. Open Access Open Data The Plankton Lifeform Extraction Tool: A digital tool to increase the discoverability and usability of plankton time-series data Clare Ostle1*, Kevin Paxman1, Carolyn A. Graves2, Mathew Arnold1, Felipe Artigas3, Angus Atkinson4, Anaïs Aubert5, Malcolm Baptie6, Beth Bear7, Jacob Bedford8, Michael Best9, Eileen 5 Bresnan10, Rachel Brittain1, Derek Broughton1, Alexandre Budria5,11, Kathryn Cook12, Michelle Devlin7, George Graham1, Nick Halliday1, Pierre Hélaouët1, Marie Johansen13, David G. Johns1, Dan Lear1, Margarita Machairopoulou10, April McKinney14, Adam Mellor14, Alex Milligan7, Sophie Pitois7, Isabelle Rombouts5, Cordula Scherer15, Paul Tett16, Claire Widdicombe4, and Abigail McQuatters-Gollop8 1 10 The Marine Biological Association (MBA), The Laboratory, Citadel Hill, Plymouth, PL1 2PB, UK. 2 Centre for Environment Fisheries and Aquacu∑lture Science (Cefas), Weymouth, UK. 3 Université du Littoral Côte d’Opale, Université de Lille, CNRS UMR 8187 LOG, Laboratoire d’Océanologie et de Géosciences, Wimereux, France. 4 Plymouth Marine Laboratory, Prospect Place, Plymouth, PL1 3DH, UK. 5 15 Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle (MNHN), CRESCO, 38 UMS Patrinat, Dinard, France. 6 Scottish Environment Protection Agency, Angus Smith Building, Maxim 6, Parklands Avenue, Eurocentral, Holytown, North Lanarkshire ML1 4WQ, UK. 7 Centre for Environment Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (Cefas), Lowestoft, UK. 8 Marine Conservation Research Group, University of Plymouth, Drake Circus, Plymouth, PL4 8AA, UK. 9 20 The Environment Agency, Kingfisher House, Goldhay Way, Peterborough, PE4 6HL, UK. 10 Marine Scotland Science, Marine Laboratory, 375 Victoria Road, Aberdeen, AB11 9DB, UK.
    [Show full text]
  • Multi-System Analysis of Nitrogen Use by Phytoplankton and Heterotrophic Bacteria
    W&M ScholarWorks Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 2009 Multi-system analysis of nitrogen use by phytoplankton and heterotrophic bacteria Paul B. Bradley College of William and Mary - Virginia Institute of Marine Science Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd Part of the Biogeochemistry Commons, and the Marine Biology Commons Recommended Citation Bradley, Paul B., "Multi-system analysis of nitrogen use by phytoplankton and heterotrophic bacteria" (2009). Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects. Paper 1539616580. https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.25773/v5-8hgt-2180 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Multi-System Analysis of Nitrogen Use by Phytoplankton and Heterotrophic Bacteria A Dissertation Presented to The Faculty of the School of Marine Science The College of William and Mary in Virginia In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Paul B Bradley 2008 APPROVAL SHEET This dissertation is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy r-/~p~J~ "--\ Paul B Bradle~ Approved, August 2008 eborah A. Bronk, Ph. Committee Chair/Advisor ~vVV Hugh W. Ducklow, Ph.D. ~gc~ Iris . Anderson, Ph.D. Lisa~~but Campbell, P . Department of Oceanography Texas A&M University College Station, Texas 11 DEDICATION Ami querida esposa, Silvia, por tu amor, apoyo, y paciencia durante esta aventura que has compartido conmigo, y A mi hijo, Dominic, por tu sonrisa y tus carcajadas, que pueden alegrar hasta el mas melanc61ico de los dias 111 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Composition and Abundance of Phytoplankton in Relation to Physical and Chemical Variables in the Kars River, Turkey
    Composition and abundance of phytoplankton ın relation to physical and chemical variables in The Kars River, Turkey Composición y abundancia del fitoplacton en relación a variables físicas y químicas en el río Kars, Turquía Özbay H Abstract. The phytoplankton of the Kars River was studied from Resumen. El fitoplacton del río Kars fue estudiado entre mayo y May to October 2005 at five sampling stations. Sixty-six phyto- octubre de 2005, en cinco estaciones de muestreo. Se determinaron plankton taxa were determined, consisting of Cyanophyta (9), Chlo- sesenta y seis taxa, pertenecientes a las Divisiones Cyanophyta (9), rophyta (25), Euglenophyta (18), Bacillariophyta (7), Cryptophyta Chlorophyta (25), Euglenophyta (18), Bacillariophyta (7), Crypto- (3), Dinophyta (1) and Chrysophyta (3). Total phytoplankton den- phyta (3), Dinophyta (1) y Chrysophyta (3). La densidad total del sity increased from May to July and then decreased until October. fitoplacton aumentó desde mayo hasta julio, y luego disminuyó hasta The dominant phytoplankton group was Cyanophyta (36.5 - 64.4%) octubre. El grupo de fitoplancton dominante fue Cyanophyta (36,5 for most of the study period, followed by Bacillariophyta (20.4 – – 64,4%) durante la mayor parte del período de estudio, seguido por 38.7%) and Chlorophyta (20.9 – 28.9%). Temperature, pH and dis- Bacillariophyta (20,4 – 38,7%) y Chlorophyta (20,9 – 28,9%). La tem- solved oxygen ranged from 9.6 °C to 21.6 °C; 7.6 to 8.0, and 5.9 peratura, el pH y el oxígeno disuelto varió de 9,6 °C a 21,6 °C; 7,6 a to 7.4 mg/L, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Ocean Iron Fertilization Experiments – Past, Present, and Future Looking to a Future Korean Iron Fertilization Experiment in the Southern Ocean (KIFES) Project
    Biogeosciences, 15, 5847–5889, 2018 https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-5847-2018 © Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Reviews and syntheses: Ocean iron fertilization experiments – past, present, and future looking to a future Korean Iron Fertilization Experiment in the Southern Ocean (KIFES) project Joo-Eun Yoon1, Kyu-Cheul Yoo2, Alison M. Macdonald3, Ho-Il Yoon2, Ki-Tae Park2, Eun Jin Yang2, Hyun-Cheol Kim2, Jae Il Lee2, Min Kyung Lee2, Jinyoung Jung2, Jisoo Park2, Jiyoung Lee1, Soyeon Kim1, Seong-Su Kim1, Kitae Kim2, and Il-Nam Kim1 1Department of Marine Science, Incheon National University, Incheon 22012, Republic of Korea 2Korea Polar Research Institute, Incheon 21990, Republic of Korea 3Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, MS 21, 266 Woods Hold Rd., Woods Hole, MA 02543, USA Correspondence: Il-Nam Kim ([email protected]) Received: 2 November 2016 – Discussion started: 15 November 2016 Revised: 16 August 2018 – Accepted: 18 August 2018 – Published: 5 October 2018 Abstract. Since the start of the industrial revolution, hu- providing insight into mechanisms operating in real time and man activities have caused a rapid increase in atmospheric under in situ conditions. To maximize the effectiveness of carbon dioxide (CO2) concentrations, which have, in turn, aOIF experiments under international aOIF regulations in the had an impact on climate leading to global warming and future, we therefore suggest a design that incorporates sev- ocean acidification. Various approaches have been proposed eral components. (1) Experiments conducted in the center of to reduce atmospheric CO2. The Martin (or iron) hypothesis an eddy structure when grazing pressure is low and silicate suggests that ocean iron fertilization (OIF) could be an ef- levels are high (e.g., in the SO south of the polar front during fective method for stimulating oceanic carbon sequestration early summer).
    [Show full text]
  • The Distribution, Dominance Patterns and Ecological Niches of Plankton Functional Types in Dynamic Green Oceanand Models Satellite Estimates M
    Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Biogeosciences Discuss., 10, 17193–17247, 2013 Open Access www.biogeosciences-discuss.net/10/17193/2013/ Biogeosciences doi:10.5194/bgd-10-17193-2013 Discussions © Author(s) 2013. CC Attribution 3.0 License. This discussion paper is/has been under review for the journal Biogeosciences (BG). Please refer to the corresponding final paper in BG if available. The distribution, dominance patterns and ecological niches of plankton functional types in Dynamic Green Ocean Models and satellite estimates M. Vogt1, T. Hashioka2,3,4, M. R. Payne1,5, E. T. Buitenhuis6, C. Le Quéré7, S. Alvain8, M. N. Aita9, L. Bopp10, S. C. Doney11, T. Hirata2, I. Lima11, S. Sailley11,*, and Y. Yamanaka2,4 1Institute for Biogeochemistry and Pollutant Dynamics, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Zurich, Switzerland 2Graduate School of Environmental Earth Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan 3Tyndall Centre for Climate Research, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK 4Core Research for Evolutionary Science and Technology, Japanese Science and Technology Agency, Tokyo, Japan 5Center for Ocean Life, National Institute of Aquatic Resources (DTU-Aqua), Technical University of Denmark, Charlottenlund, Denmark 6School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK 7Tyndall Centre for Climate Research, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK 8LOG, Université Lille Nord de France, ULCO, CNRS, Wimereux, France 17193 Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | 9Japanese Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JAMSTEC), Yokohama, Japan 10Laboratoire du Climat et de l’Environnement (LSCE), Gif-sur-Yvette, France 11Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI), Woods Hole, USA *now at: Plymouth Marine Laboratory, Plymouth, UK Received: 10 October 2013 – Accepted: 18 October 2013 – Published: 4 November 2013 Correspondence to: M.
    [Show full text]
  • The Influence of Environmental Variability on the Biogeography of Coccolithophores and Diatoms in the Great Calcite Belt Helen E
    Biogeosciences Discuss., doi:10.5194/bg-2017-110, 2017 Manuscript under review for journal Biogeosciences Discussion started: 13 April 2017 c Author(s) 2017. CC-BY 3.0 License. The Influence of Environmental Variability on the Biogeography of Coccolithophores and Diatoms in the Great Calcite Belt Helen E. K. Smith1,2, Alex J. Poulton1,3, Rebecca Garley4, Jason Hopkins5, Laura C. Lubelczyk5, Dave T. Drapeau5, Sara Rauschenberg5, Ben S. Twining5, Nicholas R. Bates2,4, William M. Balch5 5 1National Oceanography Centre, European Way, Southampton, SO14 3ZH, U.K. 2School of Ocean and Earth Science, National Oceanography Centre Southampton, University of Southampton Waterfront Campus, European Way, Southampton, SO14 3ZH, U.K. 3Present address: The Lyell Centre, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, EH14 7JG, U.K. 10 4Bermuda Institute of Ocean Sciences, 17 Biological Station, Ferry Reach, St. George's GE 01, Bermuda. 5Bigelow Laboratory for Ocean Sciences, 60 Bigelow Drive, P.O. Box 380, East Boothbay, Maine 04544, USA. Correspondence to: Helen E.K. Smith ([email protected]) Abstract. The Great Calcite Belt (GCB) of the Southern Ocean is a region of elevated summertime upper ocean calcite 15 concentration derived from coccolithophores, despite the region being known for its diatom predominance. The overlap of two major phytoplankton groups, coccolithophores and diatoms, in the dynamic frontal systems characteristic of this region, provides an ideal setting to study environmental influences on the distribution of different species within these taxonomic groups. Water samples for phytoplankton enumeration were collected from the upper 30 m during two cruises, the first to the South Atlantic sector (Jan-Feb 2011; 60o W-15o E and 36-60o S) and the second in the South Indian sector (Feb-Mar 2012; 20 40-120o E and 36-60o S).
    [Show full text]
  • A038p269.Pdf
    AQUATIC MICROBIAL ECOLOGY Vol. 38: 269–282, 2005 Published March 18 Aquat Microb Ecol Phytoplankton community structure changes following simulated upwelled iron inputs in the Peru upwelling region Clinton E. Hare1, Giacomo R. DiTullio2, Charles G. Trick3, Steven W. Wilhelm4 Kenneth W. Bruland5, Eden L. Rue5, David A. Hutchins1,* 1College of Marine Studies, University of Delaware, 700 Pilottown Road, Lewes, Delaware 19958, USA 2Hollings Marine Laboratory, University of Charleston, 205 Fort Johnson, Charleston, South Carolina 29412, USA 3Department of Biology, University of Western Ontario, Biological and Geological Sciences Building, London, Ontario N6A 5B7, Canada 4Department of Microbiology, University of Tennessee, 1414 West Cumberland, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996, USA 5Institute of Marine Sciences, University of California, Santa Cruz, 1156 High Street, Santa Cruz, California 95064, USA ABSTRACT: The effects of iron on phytoplankton community structure in ‘High Nutrient Low Chlorophyll’ regions of the ocean have been examined using both shipboard batch cultures (growouts) and open ocean mesoscale fertilization experiments. The addition of iron in these areas frequently results in a shift from communities dominated by small non-siliceous species towards ones dominated by larger diatoms. We used a new shipboard continuous culture experimental design in iron-limited Peru upwelling waters to examine shifts in phytoplankton structure and their bio- geochemical consequences following simulated upwelled iron inputs. By allowing the added iron to pre-equilibrate with natural seawater ligands, we were able to supply iron in realistic chemical spe- cies at rates and concentrations similar to those found in upwelled waters off Peru. The community shifted strongly from cyanobacteria towards diatoms, and the extent of this shift was proportional to the increase in iron supply.
    [Show full text]
  • In the IOCCG Report Series: 1. Minimum Requirements for an Operational Ocean-Colour Sensor for the Open Ocean
    In the IOCCG Report Series: 1. Minimum Requirements for an Operational Ocean-Colour Sensor for the Open Ocean (1998) 2. Status and Plans for Satellite Ocean-Colour Missions: Considerations for Com- plementary Missions (1999) 3. Remote Sensing of Ocean Colour in Coastal, and Other Optically-Complex, Waters (2000) 4. Guide to the Creation and Use of Ocean-Colour, Level-3, Binned Data Products (2004) 5. Remote Sensing of Inherent Optical Properties: Fundamentals, Tests of Algo- rithms, and Applications (2006) 6. Ocean-Colour Data Merging (2007) 7. Why Ocean Colour? The Societal Benefits of Ocean-Colour Technology (2008) 8. Remote Sensing in Fisheries and Aquaculture (2009) 9. Partition of the Ocean into Ecological Provinces: Role of Ocean-Colour Radiome- try (2009) 10. Atmospheric Correction for Remotely-Sensed Ocean-Colour Products (2010) 11. Bio-Optical Sensors on Argo Floats (2011) 12. Ocean-Colour Observations from a Geostationary Orbit (2012) 13. Mission Requirements for Future Ocean-Colour Sensors (2012) 14. In-flight Calibration of Satellite Ocean-Colour Sensors (2013) 15. Phytoplankton Functional Types from Space (this volume) Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are those of the authors; in no way do they represent the policy of agencies that support or participate in the IOCCG. The printing of this report was sponsored and carried out by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), USA, which is gratefully acknowledged. Reports and Monographs of the International Ocean-Colour Coordinating Group An Affiliated Program of the Scientific Committee on Oceanic Research (SCOR) An Associated Member of the (CEOS) IOCCG Report Number 15, 2014 Phytoplankton Functional Types from Space Edited by: Shubha Sathyendranath (Plymouth Marine Laboratory) Report of an IOCCG working group on Phytoplankton Functional Types, chaired by Shubha Sathyendranath and based on contributions from (in alphabetical order): Jim Aiken, Séverine Alvain, Ray Barlow, Heather Bouman, Astrid Bracher, Robert J.
    [Show full text]
  • Measurement of Primary Production
    ICES mar. Sei. Symp., 197: 9-19. 1993 On the definition of plankton production terms Peter J. leB. Williams Williams, P. J. IcB. 1993. On the definition of plankton production terms. - ICES mar. Sei. Symp., 197: 9-19. The development of our plankton production terminology is discussed. It has been necessary to take into consideration, successively, algal and community respiration, as loss terms; when community processes are dealt with, space, time, and the size and abundance of the individual organisms also become considerations. No agreement exists as to whether the primary processes themselves (i.e., photosynthesis and respiration) should be defined in terms of energy or material flux. An argument is presented to illustrate that our methodology is now more precise than our definitions, and a start is made to formulate a consistent set of definitions. Peter J. leB. Williams: School o f Ocean Sciences, University o f Wales, Bangor, Wales. Introduction ing to Macfadyn the paper of Thienemann (1931). I have It must be axiomatic that one cannot measure what is not attempted to assimilate their arguments into the present defined, and that the accuracy of our measurements is no text. better than that of our definitions. A number of authors I conclude by offering a set of definitions which are have discussed the terminology of ecosystem produc­ intended to be consistent and useful and which will give tivity. A prevailing view is that the definitions are us a basis with which to examine the accuracy of our wanting; the extreme view is apparently taken by Ohle production methods.
    [Show full text]
  • Primary Production in Polar Waters: Relation to Nutrient Availability
    Primary production in polar waters: relation to nutrient availability W. G. HARRISON and G. F. COTA Harrison, W.G. & Cota. G. F. 1991: Primary production in polar waters: relation to nutrient availability. Pp. 87-104 in Sakshaug, E., Hopkins. C. C. E. & Oritsland. N. A. (eds.): Proceedings of the Pro Mare Symposium on Polar Marine Ecology. Trondheim. 12-16 May 1990. Polar Research lO(1). Temperature, light and dissolved nutrients are considered the “master” abiotic properties controlling primary production in the ocean. Each of these properties, in turn, is influenced by water column stahility and vertical mixing. Sustained research over the past several decades has endeavored to ascertain which of these properties is most important in regulating phytoplankton growth. In no region has this research effort been more evident than at high latitudes. For both polar regions, extremes in each of these properties is the rule in surface waters where phytoplankton grow: the lowest ocean temperatures, the greatest seasonal excursion in incident solar radiation, and the highest dissolved nutrient concentrations. Based largely on indirect evidence, early researchers speculated that polar primary production was high relative to production at lower latitudes. This was commonly attributed to the abundant surface “macronutrients” (NO3, PO4, H4SiOJ) since physiological adaptations to the suboptimum temperatures and light were thought to characterise these high latitude populations. Intensification of polar research since the late 1960’s has in many respects modified this view. Current perspectives are that important differences exist between the Arctic and Antarctic with regard to the availability and role nutrients play in regulating primary production.
    [Show full text]
  • Improved Estimation of F-Ratio in Natural Phytoplankton Assemblages
    Deep-Sea Research I 46 (1999) 1793}1808 Improved estimation of f-ratio in natural phytoplankton assemblages Marc Elskens! *, Leo Goeyens!, Frank Dehairs!, Andrew Rees", Ian Joint", Willy Baeyens! !Laboratory of Analytical Chemistry, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium "NERC Centre for Coastal and Marine Sciences, Plymouth Marine Laboratory, Prospect Place, The Hoe, Plymouth PL1 3DH, UK Received 2 February 1998; received in revised form 19 October 1998; accepted 28 December 1998 Abstract Statistical properties in non-linear regression models of f-ratio versus nitrate relationships were investigated using a case study conducted at the European continental margin (Project OMEX). Although the OMEX data "t within the family of empirical models introduced by Platt and Harrison (1985) Nature 318, 55}58), it is shown that the discrepancy between experimental and "tted values is larger than expected, assuming that the data are accurate. Since the ambient ammonium concentration plays a leading role in regulating new production, the present analysis was extended to include explicitly the e!ect of ammonium on f-ratio versus nitrate plots. Experimental results based on controlled ammonium additions were used to express the f-ratio as a function of both nitrate concentration and ammonium inhibition, i.e. H f(,- ?).I(,& @). The estimation behaviour of the data set/model combination was analysed by testing the appropriateness of various model functions for f H and I. The best "t was obtained with a sigmoid curve, for which mean values of the random #uctuation are almost commensur- ate with the estimated uncertainty of the measurements with natural phytoplankton assem- blages.
    [Show full text]