Significance of Oriental Taxa in Phylogeny of Crab Spiders (Thomisidae S.Lat
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
© 2016. Indian Journal of Arachnology 5 (1-2): 143-171 ISSN 2278-1587 (Online) SIGNIFICANCE OF ORIENTAL TAXA IN PHYLOGENY OF CRAB SPIDERS (THOMISIDAE S.LAT. AND STIPHROPODIDAE) Pekka T. Lehtinen Zoological Museum, FIN-20014 University of Turku, Finland [email protected] ABSTRACT Numerous taxonomic changes in Oriental crab spiders are listed with justifications and suprageneric taxa are discussed at global level. Similar pattern of more than one inner cheliceral setae is found to be a synapomorphy for Borboropactidae, Stephanopidae and Thomisidae. The separation of Stiphropodidae as a valid family is confirmed. The polyphyly of Dietinae sensu Petrunkevitch, 1928 is confirmed and its tribes are listed in Thomisidae, Thomisinae (Dietini, Alcimochthini, and Amyciaeini) and Bomidae (Apyretini, Tagulini, Emplesiogonini, Mystariini, Porropini, and Talaini). Boliscini, new tribe of Bomidae is created for Boliscus Thorell, 1891 and Corynethrix L. Koch, 1876, and family group names based on Bomis L. Koch, 1874 without known female is discussed. A strange gnathocoxal process in all Boliscus spp. is described. The Stephanopine groups Phartini, Borboropactini and new tribes Cebrenninini, Angaeini and Geraestini are transferred to Borboropactidae Wunderlich, 2004, and Phrynarachnini, Stephanopoidini, and Hedanini to Thomisidae s.str. These transfers are based on similar structure of copulatory organs of both sexes, trichobothrial patterns of legs and several ultrastructural characters. Phrynarachne Thorell, 1869 with type species P. rugosus Latreille, 1804 is now included in the same tribe as Synema Simon, 1864. Senoculifer Balogh, 1936 from New Guinea is transferred from Philodromidae to Thomisidae and synonymized with Demogenes Simon, 1895. Xysticus palawanicus Barrion, 1995 is synonymized with Alcimochthes limbatus Simon, 1885 (Alcimochthini). Lehtinelagia Szymkowiak, 2014 and its type species Xysticus evanidus L. Koch, 1867 (Queensland) are synonymized with Tharrhalea L. Koch, 1875 and its type species T. albipes L. Koch, 1875 (Queensland). Ocyllus Thorell, 1887 with juvenile type species O. binotatus Thorell, 1887 from Myanmar is synonymized with Cebrenninus Simon, 1887; the latter is selected as valid for simultaneously published names. Ocyllus pallens Thorell, 1895 is transferred to Oxytate L. Koch, 1878 in Dietini. Taypaliito Barrion, 1995 and its type species T. iorebotco (Philippines, Palawan) are synonymized with Talaus (Microcyllus) Thorell, 1892 and its type species T. (M.) elegans (Indonesia, Sumatra). Takachihoa Ono, 1985 (type species Oxyptila truciformis Bösenberg & Strand, 1906 = Xysticus nebulo Simon, 1909, syn. n.) is synonymized with Pycnaxis Simon, 1895, and Coriarachne nigrostriata Simon, 1886 is transferred to Pycnaxis. Tharrhalea maculata Kulczyński, 1911 and T. variegata Kulczyński, 1911, both from New Guinea are transferred to Massuria Thorell, 1887. INTRODUCTION This work is a part of worldwide revisional study of Thomisidae sensu auct. It is not formally a complete modern revision, as it is based on selected important results. It is a list of results with carefully justified taxonomic changes in the Oriental taxa of this group. In this way, a lot of taxonomic results about this group can be published rather quickly. Limitation of space and time available makes the inclusion of normal complete data of true revisions impossible. December, 2016 143 Significance of oriental taxa in phylogeny of crab spiders Pekka T. Lehtinen Complete descriptions of treated taxa are not presented here, but taxa with new status or limitation are shortly diagnosed and reasons for the new opinion is explained. Exceptionally extensive personal field work in all tropical areas has also made possible the conclusions here, even though some of them much deviate from previously presented results. Problems to be solved. a) Many name-bearing types of crab spiders described long ago by Simon, Thorell, L. Koch, Karsch, Workman, O. Pickard-Cambridge, and other spider taxonomists of the past have never before been studied after their original description, even those preserved in well known European museums in Paris, Genoa, Stockholm, London, Geneva, Oxford, and Dublin. b) Several local specialists in the Oriental region have not at all or quite seldom, at least, tried to co-operate with colleagues or at least ask for advice from well trained specialists from Europe, North America or Australia. This is unfortunately true for most arachnologists from India, Pakistan and Philippines working with crab spiders after 1960. Positive exceptions have been several current arachnologists in Japan, China, Taiwan, Sri Lanka and Thailand, while much arachnological work for Laos (in addition to the work in Thailand) has been recently carried out by some active European specialists. Incorrectly placed Philippine crab spiders have been checked in IRRI, Los Baños, and many of Dahl´s (1907) errors from slides in ZMB. c) Fruitful work of most European, North American and even of many local arachnologists has been prevented and/or complicated by worldwide unique policies of some museums, especially ZSI (Kolkata), preventing not only the loan of material, but also suggested work with them on site. d) After the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development in Rio de Janeiro in 1992, governmental offices in many (less developed) countries interpreted the decisions in a way, which largely stopped the real co-operation with scientists in developed countries (except for those living in countries with high economical resources), e.g., by legally prohibiting all transport of biota to foreign countries for scientific purposes. Although the policies were most radically changed in Brazil, almost similar is the situation in Philippines. This explains that the situation does not depend at all on the attitudes of local arachnologists. The results are presented in two parts. Complete description of a new Malagasy-Mauritian tribe of Stephanopidae, new limitation of Stiphropodidae and Bomidae, all changes within the traditional subfamily Thomisinae and within most true members of the tribe Hedanini will be published separately. Bond et al. (2014) and Fernandez et al. (2014) have recently used an entirely different method of molecular biology, phylogenomics, and independently obtained surprisingly similar results as the phylogenetic conclusions presented here that are based on ultrastructural analysis of cuticle, setae and sensory organs. This seems to confirm the applicability of ultrastructure as a reliable method in solving problems of phylogenetic relationships of supraspecific taxa. The aim of this study is to list and discuss taxonomical changes to crab spider taxa of the Oriental region, according to the results of personal work and give sufficient justification for them, though formal details for complete taxonomic revisions are presented only for a few selected cases. Special attention has been directed to the correction of numerous strange taxonomic interpretations of Oriental crab spiders after 1960, both by Indian and Philippine active arachnologists also working with the crab spiders. Essential abbreviations used: * I have checked the holotype/syntypes. This refers to type material of the type species. Indian Journal of Arachnology 5 (1-2) 144 Significance of oriental taxa in phylogeny of crab spiders Pekka T. Lehtinen # I have checked authoritatively identified material. ¤ I have compared topotypical adults of both sexes and juvenile specimens of different age with holotype in cases, where the holotype is not adult. This is the only way to confirm the identity of the holotype in a few cases. Abbreviations for eye and spinneret patterns according to widely accepted formulae. If not otherwise noted, the source of photographed and micrographed specimens is the personal temporary collection (PTL) or ZMT for material collected before 1999. A further technical solution: for all new taxa in Barrion & Litsinger (1995), Barrion is here cited as the only author, as it has been officially confirmed that Mr. Litsinger has not participated to the taxonomic work with results published in this book. This principle should be generally applied as strictly Code-compliant (ICZN, 1999 § 50.1). References concerning the book as such should not be changed. MATERIAL AND METHODS My field research on tropical spiders began in the Oriental region in 1969 by a field trip to Sri Lanka (with four later expeditions). Number of visits to other Oriental areas are listed in brackets: Malaysia (5), Thailand (4), Indonesia: Sumatra, Java, Kalimantan, Sulawesi, Bali, Lombok & Flores (5), Vietnam (1), Philippines: Luzon, Mindoro, Cebu, Palawan & Mindanao (3), India (3), Pakistan (1), Singapore (3), China+Hongkong & Lantau Island+Macau & Coloane Island (3), and Taiwan (5). During these trips, spider material was also collected from Samoa (Savaii, Uapou & Tutuila), Tonga (Tongatapu, Eua, Vavau), Fiji (Viti Levu) (3), Micronesia (Guam), New Guinea with Goodenough Islands & Manus Island (2), Australia with Tasmania (4), New Caledonia (3), New Zealand (2), 19 islands of Polynesia (Cook-, Society-, Marquesas- & Tuamotu- Islands with 5 expeditions), as well from Easter Island, Baltra & Santa Cruz I. of the Galapagos Islands, and Kauai, Oahu, Maui & Hawaii in Hawaiian Islands. In addition to the personally collected material, an absolute provision for this study has been the checking of type material in numerous museums all over the world. Personal best, applied strategy: Selected own material packed