Ewsletter Nseptember 2004 NUMBER EIGHT Norfolk Historic Buildings Group

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ewsletter Nseptember 2004 NUMBER EIGHT Norfolk Historic Buildings Group HBG ewsletter NSeptember 2004 NUMBER EIGHT Norfolk Historic Buildings Group www.nhbg.fsnet.co.uk (photo: A R Forrest) Members listening to Mike Knights talking at the AGM at Oulton Chapel, near Aylsham, about the chapel itself and Norfolk Historic Buildings Trust (see p.9). Contents Brick in Eastern England .............................. 2 Oulton Chapel ............................................... 9 AGM—4 June 2004 ......................................17 Looking up at Diss .........................................3 The Dower House, Tacolneston ............10 The Vernacular Architecture Group ...17 Ketteringham .................................................. 4 Wallpaper at Narborough Hall .............15 Letters .......................................................... 17-18 Little Walsingham...........................................5 Book Recommendations ...........................15 NHBG Committee June 2004 .................19 Ruminations at Godwick .......................... 6 News and Views ............................................16 NHBG Winter2004/05 ................20 The Old Hall, East Tuddenham ............... 8 Church Sub Group .......................................16 Wattle & Daub/ Clay Lump Day ............ 9 Membership ....................................................16 The New Buckenham Project .................16 Here we are with the Autumn edition of the Newsletter and plenty to report and comment on. The summer programme of events and visits has gone forward very successfully with members visiting the historic towns of Diss and Little Walsingham and exploring some fascinating individual buildings which are not accessible to the public. I particularly recall two equally balmy evenings at Ketteringham and East Tuddenham, filled with exploration and lively debate, and not just from the ‘experts’. The Group owes a vote of thanks to Rosemary and her team for the smooth running of these adventures and of course to the owners of the houses, whose amazing generosity in letting us invade their privacy makes everything possible. Without their cooperation effectively our subject would not exist. As Adam Longcroft announced in the last Newsletter, he stood down as Chairman at the AGM and I was elected in his place: not an easy one to fill. Adam’s expertise and hard work have given the Group a terrific start and we are in a position to make a real contribution to the study of the buildings around us. Any serious organisation such as ours must pay attention to the twin commitments of teaching and research. The former is contained in the rich and varied winter programme published in this Newsletter and the latter is well under way with the work of the Churches study group and the approaching culmination of the New Buckenham Project (see page 19). The results of the dendro survey will be announced at the meeting in New Buckenham on the 24th September so do try to be there to celebrate or commiserate, depending on the outcome. The New Buckenham Project is the subject of the next edition of the Journal, to appear in Spring 2005. Most of the material for this has now been organised and the publication should give us a solid stepping-off point for the next phase of research, the wider picture of Norfolk buildings. Much of the research for this second phase is already in hand, so there is plenty of material waiting to be interpreted, and perhaps a further grant to finance more dendro. Of course, all this depends on the people who come forward to make it happen, and the expansion of the events organising teams has already paid off by reducing the pressure on individuals. The scheme for training building recorders has produced ‘The Tacolneston Four’, who are now ready to tackle almost anything and have already contributed to the surveys needed for the New Buckenham dendro project. The next programme of training starts at Tibenham Farm, Long Row, Tibenham on Tuesday 14th September, so if you missed the preliminary meeting at the Fenners’, phone Sue Brown on 01362 688362 and book your place. The range of human, historical and aesthetic interest to be found in Norfolk’s historic buildings continues to amaze me afresh and there is a lot of relatively unexplored territory to be looked at. It is a thrilling prospect. Michael Brown Woodlands, Bylaugh Park Norfolk NR20 4RL C H A I R 01362 688362‚ Brick in Eastern England George Fenner and Rosemary Forrest were well rewarded for eighteenth century. their excursion into Essex for a day school which was run by There was a wealth of information about brick manufacture Essex County Council and Essex Historic Buildings Group at from the clays, additions for colour and texture, firing methods Cressing Temple. It brought together seven speakers who ap- to an impressive demonstration of brick handling. The first proached the topic from aspects of distribution, development, bricks were large “two-handed” jobs but by the early fourteenth manufacture, and craftsmanship. century early ergonomic brickies had honed their skills and Speakers consistently warned about dating a building by developed a “single-handed” brick. brick size. It became clear that this is not an exact science. Whilst there were photographs of wonderful brick buildings, It was agreed that the Romans were the initiators of brick and attention was also drawn to alternative sources of evidence for that the Saxons and Normans reused many of their bricks. On the use and producers of brick: early building accounts, glebe the Continent brick use continued and was reintroduced here by terriers, estate accounts, wills, inventories, poll books. Flemish brickmakers in the thirteenth century; they again bol- An excellent bibliography of some 50 references was pro- stered production and skills in the late fifteenth/ early sixteenth vided. If anyone would like a copy, then do please contact Renaissance period. It was not until the seventeenth century George (01603 620690) or Rosemary (01603 742315). that bricks became more freely available. Then transport–first This conference provided a wide overview of brick history by waterways, turnpikes, canals, and then railways–and mecha- in the Eastern Counties. Just as importantly it created an op- nisation made bricks available to all.. One interesting research portunity to meet like-minded people and to share knowledge. topic was suggested regarding the proximity of brickworks Could the Group persuade Norfolk County Council to consider to turnpikes, canals and roads. The first users of brick were running similarly targeted gatherings with the emphasis on the wealthy church establishments and royal personages who buildings rather than conservation? passed the fashionable look of brick down to their wealthy court hangers-on, before its use reached humbler levels by the late winter 2004•number eight•2 Looking up at Diss (O.E. ‘Ditch’ modified by the Normans to Diss) Bill English David Summers, the architect, met us at the Saracen’s Head, buildings shone through at every turn in Diss. Sometimes he Mount Street (16th Century or earlier to Victorian, and may would gently challenge us, ‘What do you think of that building have housed the Wool Guild), in the centre of what was probably at the end of the street?’ Does he approve or disapprove? you Diss’s medieval wool trade district. The large Perpendicular hurriedly think, mild panic in danger of skewing your judge- parish church next door may owe its size to the wealth generated ment. I managed to pass each test, I hope more by judgement by this industry. The significance of Diss is evident because it than luck. Two examples: the Corn Hall, (massive Victorian had more medieval guilds than comparable Norfolk towns. Mr scale, commanding pillars), bad; and the modern building ap- Summers urged us to spend our day in Diss looking up at the pearing to block off the end of Mere Street, good. higher parts of buildings fully to appreciate the enormous variety Finally, any visitor cannot miss the extraordinary lake, The of detail in and around windows, doors and gables. Mere, in the centre of Diss (said to be the second deepest lake in England and soon to be the subject of a university geological study). On a sunny day the mixture of old and new buildings round much of The Mere gives Diss an almost Riviera atmos- phere. 2004 is the 500th anniversary of the arrival of John Skelton in Diss. He was court poet to Henry VII, satirist and tutor to Prince Henry (later VIII). The town is part way through a year long Skelton Festival which is commendably wide and varied in its scope. Diss is a lively and interesting ancient town battling to Mitred corner reconcile its narrow streets joint probably and ancient buildings with from the late the 21st Century, and on fifteenth century balance succeeding. (cf C Hewitt, Manor House, Mount Street English Historic Carpentry, Phil- limore, 1980, p 277) At the same time he encouraged us to look at the whole streetscape, how buildings fit in and complement each other or, sadly, in some cases don’t. Where there are gaps (demoli- tion, bad planning) he hopes to find visual links in the modern replacements so that a “missing tooth” effect is ameliorated. He Carved corner argues that a beautiful and large residential building like The posts; one in Georgian Manor House (Flemish bond) should keep its large juxta-position garden, not fall prey to in-filling or other development. Houses with the nine- like these need space round them, even if it’s not for public ac- teenth century cess. He’s talking about spirit of place. This great respect for door case the ordinary vision and craftsmanship of our ancestors clearly means a lot to David Summers. Where he sees good modern design which is sympathetic to older buildings in the same street, he stops and comments, explaining how good modern architecture can span the centuries and achieve this unity; for example, new sheltered housing next to The Saracen’s Head. In Mount Street, the pedestrianised Mere Street and Den- mark Street, members spotted and discussed exterior details of buildings and theorised as to function and developmental The Saracen’s Head PH, Mount Street: early 17th century roll sequence.
Recommended publications
  • CPRE Norfolk Housing Allocation Pledge Signatures – Correct As of 24 March 2021 South Norfolk Alburgh Ashby St Mary Barford &A
    CPRE Norfolk Housing Allocation Pledge Signatures – correct as of 24 March 2021 South Norfolk Alburgh Ashby St Mary Barford & Wramplingham Barnham Broom Bawburgh Bergh Apton Bracon Ash and Hethel Brockdish Broome Colney Costessey Cringleford Dickleburgh and Rushall Diss Framingham Pigot Forncett Gissing Great Melton Hempnall Hethersett Hingham Keswick and Intwood Kirby Cane and Ellingham Langley with Hardley Marlingford and Colton Mulbarton Rockland St Mary with Hellington Saxlingham Nethergate Scole Shelfanger Shelton and Hardwick Shotesham Stockton Surlingham Thurlton Thurton Thwaite St Mary Tivetshall St Margaret Tivetshall St Mary Trowse with Newton Winfarthing Wreningham Broadland Acle Attlebridge Beighton Blofield Brandiston Buxton with Lamas Cantley, Limpenhoe and Southwood Coltishall Drayton Felthorpe Frettenham Great Witchingham Hainford Hemblington Hevingham Honingham Horsford Horsham St Faiths Lingwood and Burlingham Reedham Reepham Ringland Salhouse Stratton Strawless Strumpshaw Swannington with Alderford and Little Witchingham Upton with Fishley Weston Longville Wood Dalling Woodbastwick Total = 72 Total parishes in Broadland & South Norfolk = 181 % signed = 39.8% Breckland Ashill Banham Bintree Carbrooke Caston Colkirk Cranworth East Tuddenham Foulden Garveston, Reymerston & Thuxton Gooderstone Great Ellingham Harling Hockering Lyng Merton Mundford North Tuddenham Ovington Rocklands Roudham & Larling Saham Toney Scoulton Stow Bedon & Breckles Swaffham Weeting with Broomhill Whinburgh & Westfield Wretham Yaxham Great Yarmouth
    [Show full text]
  • Breckland District Council (Ashill
    PARISH OF ASHILL Footpath No. 1 (South Pickenham/Watton Road to Houghton Common Road). Starts from fieldgate on South Pickenham/Watton Road and runs eastwards to enter Houghton Common Road opposite western end of Footpath No. 5. Bridleway No. 2 (South Pickenham/Watton Road to Peddars Way). Starts from South Pickenham/Watton Road and runs south westwards and enters Peddars Way by Caudle Hill. Footpath No 5 (Houghton Common to Church Farm) Starts from Houghton Common Road opposite the eastern end of Footpath No. 1 and runs eastwards to TF 880046. From this point onwards the width of the path is 1.5 metres and runs north along the eastern side of a drainage ditch for approximately 94 metres to TF 879047 where it turns to run in an easterly direction along the southern side of a drainage ditch for approximately 275 metres to TF 882048. The path then turns south running on the western side of a drainage ditch for approximately 116 metres to TF 882046, then turns eastwards to the south of a drainage ditch for approximately 50 metres to TF 883047 where it turns to run southwards on the western side of a drainage ditch for approximately 215 metres to TF 883044 thereafter turning west along the northern side of a drainage ditch and hedge for approximately 120 metres to TF 882044. The width of the path from this point is not determined as the path turns southwards to Church Farm. April 2004 Footpath No. 6 (Watton/Ashill Road to Footpath No. 5) Starts from Watton/Ashill Road north of Crown Inn and opposite Goose Green and runs westwards to TF 885046.
    [Show full text]
  • NOTICE of ELECTION Election of Parish Councillors
    NOTICE OF ELECTION Breckland Election of Parish Councillors for the Parishes listed below Number of Number of Parish Parish Parishes Parishes Councillors to Councillors to be elected be elected Parish of Ashill Nine (9) Parish of Little Dunham Seven (7) Parish of Banham Nine (9) Parish of Little Ellingham Five (5) Parish of Bawdeswell Seven (7) Parish of Longham Seven (7) Parish of Beachamwell Seven (7) Parish of Lyng Seven (7) Parish of Beeston with Bittering Seven (7) Parish of Mattishall Nine (9) Parish of Beetley Seven (7) Parish of Merton Five (5) Parish of Besthorpe Seven (7) Parish of Mileham Seven (7) Parish of Billingford Seven (7) Parish of Mundford Nine (9) Parish of Bintree Seven (7) Parish of Narborough Seven (7) Parish of Blo` Norton Five (5) Parish of New Buckenham Seven (7) Parish of Bradenham Seven (7) Parish of Necton Nine (9) Parish of Brettenham and Seven (7) Parish of North Elmham Eleven(11) Kilverstone Parish of Bridgham Five (5) Parish of North Lopham Seven (7) Parish of Brisley Seven (7) Parish of North Pickenham Seven (7) Parish of Carbrooke Nine (9) Parish of North Tuddenham Seven (7) Parish of Caston Seven (7) Parish of Old Buckenham Eleven(11) Parish of Cockley Cley Five (5) Parish of Ovington Five (5) Parish of Colkirk Seven (7) Parish of Oxborough Five (5) Parish of Cranworth Seven (7) Parish of Quidenham Seven (7) Parish of Croxton Five (5) Parish of Rocklands Seven (7) Parish of East Tuddenham Seven (7) Parish of Rougham Seven (7) Parish of Elsing Seven (7) Parish of Roudham and Larling Seven (7) Parish
    [Show full text]
  • Skidmore, Skitmore and Scudamore Families of Suffolk and Norfolk
    Skidmore, Skitmore and Scudamore of Suffolk and Norfolk Skidmore/ Scudamore One-Name Study SKIDMORE, SKITMORE AND SCUDAMORE FAMILIES OF SUFFOLK AND NORFOLK by Linda Moffatt ©2016 CITATION Please respect the author's contribution and state where you found this information if you quote it. Suggested citation 'Skidmore, Skitmore and Scudamore Families of Suffolk and Norfolk by Linda Moffatt at the website of the Skidmore/ Scudamore One-Name Study www.skidmorefamilyhistory.com'. Minor changes were made to this account by Linda Moffatt on 25 July 2017. DATES • Prior to 1752 the year began on 25 March (Lady Day). In order to avoid confusion, a date which in the modern calendar would be written 2 February 1714 is written 2 February 1713/4 - i.e. the baptism, marriage or burial occurred in the 3 months (January, February and the first 3 weeks of March) of 1713 which 'rolled over' into what in a modern calendar would be 1714. • Civil registration was introduced in England and Wales in 1837 and records were archived quarterly; hence, for example, 'born in 1840Q1' the author here uses to mean that the birth took place in January, February or March of 1840. For an individual born after 1837, where only a baptism date is given, assume the birth was registered in the same quarter but the exact date of birth is not presently known. BIRTHS, MARRIAGES AND DEATHS Databases of all known Skidmore and Scudamore bmds can be found at ww.skidmorefamilyhistory.com PROBATE A list of all known Skidmore and Scudamore wills - many with full transcription or an abstract of its contents - can be found at www.skidmorefamilyhistory.com in the file Skidmore/Scudamore One-Name Study Probate.
    [Show full text]
  • Plot 6 Bayfields, East Tuddenham
    Plot 3 Plot 6 Bayfields, East Tuddenham Plot 6 Bayfields, East Tuddenham, NR20 3SH A high quality new home by Fleur Developments. The property Traditional in design, plot 6 is under construction and being built using only good quality materials and careful craftsmanship. It is to the same design and layout as Plot 3 and is scheduled for completion in July 2016. The images shown here are of Plot 3, hence indicative of Plot 6. Its contemporary interior is light, open and luxurious and includes an impressive Masterclass kitchen, engineered oak flooring and beautiful modern bathrooms. An open fireplace with stone hearth, adds depth to the living room, while heritage wall colours provide a stylish touch throughout. Set back from a private road, this house has its own gravel driveway and large single garage. The spacious interior includes 4 first floor double bedrooms, 2 with en-suite bathrooms, and the Master Bedroom benefits from a walk-in wardrobe. Plot 3 A large kitchen/dining area and sizeable living room and study/snug provide plentiful living space on the ground floor. With the garden a prime feature, an elegant terrace leads off from the kitchen/dining room. Plot 3 Plot 3 Plot 3 Location Local Amenities The historic and picturesque All Saints church sits at the end of East Tuddenham and is actively supported by the village. Well-stocked village shops, a doctors’ surgery and a primary school are all within neighbouring Mattishall and the nearest supermarket is just 3 miles along the A47. In addition, Norwich itself offering a wide range of shops and amenities, including the University Hospital and Norwich Airport, which are a 15 and 20 minute drive respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • A47 Corridor Improvement Scheme Public Consultation Report A47 North Tuddenham to Easton
    A47 corridor improvement scheme Public consultation report A47 North Tuddenham to Easton Road Investment Strategy A47 Improvements North Tuddenham to Easton Report on Public Consultation August 2017 Date: 14 August 2017 Version: 1.2 1 The original format of this document is copyright to the Highways England 2 Table of Contents 1 Introduction 5 1.1 Background 5 1.2 Purpose of non-Statutory Public Consultation 6 1.3 Purpose and Structure of Report on Public Consultation 6 1.4 A47 North Tuddenham to Easton 6 1.5 Scheme Objectives and Proposals 7 2 Proposals Presented for Public Consultation 8 2.1 Our Proposed Options 8 2.2 Proposed Option 1 8 2.3 Proposed Option 2 8 2.4 Proposed Option 3 9 2.5 Proposed Option 4 10 2.6 Alternative Options 10 3 Consultation Arrangements 11 3.1 Brochure and Questionnaire 11 3.2 Advertising 11 3.3 Public Information Exhibition 12 3.4 Display Material 12 3.5 Attendance at Exhibition 12 3.6 Additional material on display 13 3.7 Meetings with affected parties 13 4 Reporting Methodology 14 4.1 Data receipt and digitisation of all submissions 14 4.2 Analysis Process 16 4.3 Reporting 16 4.4 Quality Assurance 17 5 Questions about Road Usage 18 5.1 Types of road user 18 5.2 Frequency of travel along the A47 North Tuddenham to Easton route 19 5.3 Purpose of travel along the A47 North Tuddenham to Easton route 19 5.4 Proximity to the A47 North Tuddenham to Easton route 20 6 The Need for Improvements 22 6.1 Response to question 12 22 6.2 Comments supporting the need for improvement 22 6.3 Comments opposing the need for
    [Show full text]
  • Electoral Changes) Order 2002
    STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 2002 No. 3221 LOCAL GOVERNMENT, ENGLAND The District of Breckland (Electoral Changes) Order 2002 Made - - - - - 18th December 2002 Coming into force in accordance with article 1(2) Whereas the Boundary Committee for England(a), acting pursuant to section 15(4) of the Local Government Act 1992(b), has submitted to the Electoral Commission(c) a report dated July 2002 on its review of the district of Breckland together with its recommendations: And whereas the Electoral Commission have decided to give eVect to those recommendations: And whereas a period of not less than six weeks has expired since the receipt of those recommendations: Now, therefore, the Electoral Commission, in exercise of the powers conferred on them by sections 17(d) and 26(e) of the Local Government Act 1992, and of all other powers enabling them in that behalf, hereby make the following Order: Citation and commencement 1.—(1) This Order may be cited as the District of Breckland (Electoral Changes) Order 2002. (2) This Order shall come into force— (a) for the purpose of proceedings preliminary or relating to any election to be held on 1st May 2003, on the day after that on which it is made; (b) for all other purposes, on 1st May 2003. Interpretation 2. In this Order— “district” means the district of Breckland; “existing”, in relation to a ward, means the ward as it exists on the date this Order is made; any reference to the map is a reference to the map marked “Map referred to in the District of Breckland (Electoral Changes) Order 2002”, of which prints are available for inspection at— (a) the principal oYce of the Electoral Commission; and (b) the oYces of Breckland District Council; (a) The Boundary Committee for England is a committee of the Electoral Commission, established by the Electoral Commission in accordance with section 14 of the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000 (c.
    [Show full text]
  • Norfolk Map Books
    Scoulton Wicklewood Hingham Wymondham Division Arrangements for Deopham Little Ellingham Attleborough Morley Hingham County District Final Recommendations Spooners Row Yare & Necton Parish Great Ellingham Besthorpe Rocklands Attleborough Attleborough Bunwell Shropham The Brecks West Depwade Carleton Rode Old Buckenham Snetterton Guiltcross Quidenham 00.375 0.75 1.5 Kilometers Contains OS data © Crown copyright and database right 2016 © Crown copyright and database rights 2016 OSGD New Buckenham 100049926 2016 Tibenham Bylaugh Beetley Mileham Division Arrangements for Dereham North & Scarning Swanton Morley Hoe Elsing County District Longham Beeston with Bittering Launditch Final Recommendations Parish Gressenhall North Tuddenham Wendling Dereham Fransham Dereham North & Scarning Dereham South Scarning Mattishall Elmham & Mattishall Necton Yaxham Whinburgh & Westfield Bradenham Yare & Necton Shipdham Garvestone 00.425 0.85 1.7 Kilometers Contains OS data © Crown copyright and database right 2016 © Crown copyright and database rights 2016 OSGD Holme Hale 100049926 2016 Cranworth Gressenhall Dereham North & Scarning Launditch Division Arrangements for Dereham South County District Final Recommendations Parish Dereham Scarning Dereham South Yaxham Elmham & Mattishall Shipdham Whinburgh & Westfield 00.125 0.25 0.5 Yare & Necton Kilometers Contains OS data © Crown copyright and database right 2016 © Crown copyright and database rights 2016 OSGD 100049926 2016 Sculthorpe Fakenham Erpingham Kettlestone Fulmodeston Hindolveston Thurning Erpingham
    [Show full text]
  • Hingham Dereham
    Route map for Konectbus service 17 (outbound) Market Place Great Fransham Swan Dereham Road Abbott's Farm Hockering Wendling (Naturist) 17 17 West End Clippings Green Yaxham Little Fransham Handel Drive Road Toftwood Westfield Lane Mattishall East Tuddenham Station Road Yaxham Waters Yaxham South Green Bus Shelter Welborne Necton Brakefield Green 17 Dereham Road Bradenham 17 Coates Hale Post Corner Road Brandon Parva Holme Hale Office Garvestone Shipdham Barnham Broom Cushing Close Tinkers Town Thuxton Bullock Lane Lane Close Thuxton Cottages 17 Coston Reymerston Church 17 Carleton Forehoe Devil's Playing Ketts Dyke Field Cottage Cranworth Ashill Beeches Lane Woodrising Road The Lincoln Avenue Fairland Wicklewood Saham Toney Ovington Rectory Farm Greenacre Hingham Road Milestone Farm © OpenStreetMap 2.5 km 5 km 7.5 km 10 km ea-21017_(1).y08 (outbound) Route map for Konectbus service 17 (inbound) St Nicholas North Tuddenham Street Great Fransham John Bates Close Dereham Abbott's Farm Hockering Wendling Morrisons (Naturist) 17 West End Little Fransham East Toftwood Tuddenham 17 Mattishall Yaxham Waters Yaxham South Green Bus Shelter Welborne Necton Dereham Brakefield Green 17 Road Bradenham 17 Hale Green Chapel Post Brandon Parva Holme Hale Road Office Street Garvestone Cushing Close Shipdham Coates Barnham Broom Corner Town Thuxton Bullock Lane Close Thuxton Cottages Tinkers Lane Coston Reymerston Devil's Playing Dyke Field Cranworth Ashill Beeches Lane Woodrising Road Lincoln 17 Greenacre Avenue Road Wicklewood Saham Toney Ovington Rectory Farm Bus Hingham Shelter Milestone Farm © OpenStreetMap 2.5 km 5 km 7.5 km 10 km ea-21017_(1).y08 (inbound).
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix G2 Social and Heritage Constraints
    SOCIAL AND HERITAGE CONSTRAINTS CONFIDENTIAL THIS DRAWING MAY BE USED ONLY FOR THE PURPOSE INTENDED AND ONLY WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL BE USED Legend Norfolk County Boundary Listed Building Listed Buildings: Grade I ± Grade II* Grade II Restricted_Byway Norton Hill Footpath Byway open to all traffic Shepherd's Port Bridleway Sustrans Local Route: Local Route (on road) Local Route (off road) Shernborne Sustrans Regional Route: Regional Route (On Road) Regional Route (Off Road) Sustrans National Route: National Route (on road) Dersingham National Route (off road) Sustrans NCN Link: NCN Link (on road) Anmer NCN Link (off road) Gedney Drove End Air Quality Management Area B a Noise Action Planning Important Areas b Wolferton Sandringham in g l e y R iv e r West Newton Babingley A148 Guy's Head r ngley R ive Babi North Wootton Roydon South Wootton Copyright This map is reproduced from Ordnance Survey material with the permission of Ordnance Survey Littl e Sutton on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office. Pott Row A149 © Crown copyright Sutton Bridge North Lynn Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown copyright and may lead to prosecution or Orange Row civil proceedings. Church Field Contains Ordnance Survey data. Clenchwarton © Crown copyright and database right 2020 Gaywood Drawing Status Main iDra n Sou htHo lland South Green Fairstead Bawsey FINAL Ashwicken 1 Balsam Field A17 Job Title Walpole Cross Keys Tydd St Mary Leziate River Nene South Lynn Hardwick NORFOLK COUNTY 1 COUNCIL DRAFT LTP4 Tydd Gote r a Foul Anchor
    [Show full text]
  • North Tuddenham to Easton Ground Investigations and Surveys A47 North Tuddenham to Easton Improvement
    If you need help accessing this or any other Highways England information, please call 0300 123 5000 and we will help you. A47 North Tuddenham to Easton Ground investigations and surveys A47 North Tuddenham to Easton improvement This leaflet is to update you on progress of the proposed A47 dualling between North Tuddenham and Easton. We will be carrying out further surveys and ground investigations to supplement our 2020 surveys and to give engineers a more detailed picture of soil type, depth and nature of rock types and groundwater levels. This work will be visible to those living and working in the area. The information gained will help us manage the design, in readiness for the start of works planned in 2022/23. What is happening and where? We’ll be using a variety of ground investigation techniques including boreholes, machine excavated trial pits and ground water sampling. We will require access to certain areas of land to enable this work to take place and will contact the appropriate land owners. During summer 2021, we will be investigating the area along where the proposed road changes will be made. 2 3 B1535 Ringland Road Norwich Western Link Hockering Wood proposed route Wood Lane Sandy Lane Easton - new bridge Proposed Norwich for walkers and Western Link cyclists A47 connection Taverham Road Proposed A47 North Hall Farm underpass Hockering Parish Tuddenham to Easton improvements (dualling) Existing bridge New bridge over Church Lane over the River Tud the River Tud Proposed North Tuddenham Heath Road Wood Lane Dereham Road Parish junction Proposed A47 North Hockering Hill Lane Tuddenham to Easton Bridge over Easton improvements (dualling) Mattishall Lane Lyng Road link road St Michael’s St Peter’s Church Church The Street St.
    [Show full text]
  • Parish Share Report
    PARISH SHARE PAYMENTS For period ended 30th September 2020 SUMMARY OF PARISH SHARE PAYMENTS BY DEANERIES Dean Amount % Deanery Share Received for 2020 % Deanery Share % No Outstanding 2019 2020 to period end 2019 Received for 2019 received £ £ £ £ £ Norwich Archdeaconry 06 Norwich East 22,764 4.09 584,363 356,067 60.93 557,186 354,184 63.57 04 Norwich North 33,864 6.66 520,664 261,458 50.22 508,577 333,671 65.61 05 Norwich South 34,380 8.40 370,673 294,468 79.44 409,212 267,621 65.40 Norfolk Archdeaconry 01 Blofield 22,229 6.79 331,836 168,389 50.74 327,284 212,276 64.86 11 Depwade 33,147 11.80 269,250 124,212 46.13 280,831 137,847 49.09 02 Great Yarmouth 46,473 9.93 476,879 219,287 45.98 467,972 283,804 60.65 13 Humbleyard 64,860 14.81 438,596 126,752 28.90 437,949 192,301 43.91 14 Loddon 77,050 22.96 327,666 156,264 47.69 335,571 165,520 49.32 15 Lothingland 41,060 7.30 562,218 313,514 55.76 562,194 381,997 67.95 16 Redenhall 71,391 21.01 352,467 147,380 41.81 339,813 183,032 53.86 09 St Benet 15,554 4.09 381,805 241,234 63.18 380,642 229,484 60.29 17 Thetford & Rockland 59,355 18.89 304,536 131,088 43.05 314,266 182,806 58.17 Lynn Archdeaconry 18 Breckland 76,264 19.17 386,285 199,154 51.56 397,811 233,505 58.70 20 Burnham & Walsingham 54,455 13.74 417,379 205,964 49.35 396,393 241,163 60.84 12 Dereham in Mitford 20,440 5.77 363,605 186,455 51.28 353,955 223,631 63.18 21 Heacham & Rising 44,759 11.86 367,102 204,722 55.77 377,375 245,242 64.99 22 Holt 18,514 5.65 339,511 189,303 55.76 327,646 207,089 63.21 23 Lynn 20,372 6.17 341,831 153,174 44.81 330,152 196,022 59.37 07 Repps 15,424 4.02 386,525 245,097 63.41 383,729 278,123 72.48 03 08 Ingworth & Sparham 55,048 12.94 448,340 250,719 55.92 425,260 239,965 56.43 827,403 10.46 7,971,531 4,174,702 52.37 7,913,818 4,789,282 60.52 01/10/2020 NORWICH DIOCESAN BOARD OF FINANCE LTD DEANERY HISTORY REPORT MONTH September YEAR 2020 SUMMARY PARISH 2018 OUTST.
    [Show full text]