DOCSLIB.ORG

Palestine the British Mandate

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Palestine the British Mandate PalestinPalestinee ThThee BritishBritish MandateMandate A collectioncollection of sourcessources fromfrom 1917-1940,1917-1940, publishedpublished oonn microfichemicrofiche ÖIDM IDCC PalestinePalestine:: ThThee BritishBritish MandatMandatee A collectiocollectionn ooff sourcesourcess frofromm 1917-1941917-19400 oonn microfichemicrofiche ThisThis cataloquecataloque offersoffers aa comprehensivecomprehensive collectioncollection TheThe legallegal aspectsaspects ofof PalestinePalestine havehave beebeenn micro-micro- ofof sourcessources whichwhich relaterelate toto thethe historyhistory ofof PalestinePalestine fichedfiched asas a separateseparate project:project: andand whichwhich areare rarelrarelyy toto bbee foundfound inin suchsuch completenesscompleteness iinn mostmost university-departmentsuniversity-departments andand research-institutesresearch-institutes.. Palestine:Palestine: ThThee legallegal backgroundbackground ThisThis collectioncollection coverscovers thethe principalprincipal Memoranda,Memoranda, TheThe brochurebrochure forfor thisthis projectproject isis availableavailable freefree onon StatementsStatements anandd ReportsReports publishedpublished duringduring thethe requestrequest.. TheThe brochurebrochure listslists 2323 titlestitles timtimee ofof thethe BritishBritish Mandate,Mandate, fromfrom thethe BalfourBalfour butbut allall titlestitles maymay DeclarationDeclaration iinn 19171917 untiluntil thethe endend ofof thethe MandateMandate alsoalso oeoe purcnasedpurcnased individually.individually. TheThe projectproject lists:lists: iinn 1948.1948. TheThe collectioncollection includesincludes thethe WhiteWhite PapersPapers OttomanOttoman Laws,Laws, LawsLaws issueissuedd iinn PalestinePalestine bbyy thethe anandd ReportsReports relatingrelating toto thethe OfficialOfficial CommissionsCommissions MandatMandatee Authorities,Authorities, JordanianJordanian LawsLaws andand MilitaryMilitary sensentt toto Palestine.Palestine. OrdersOrders andand IsraeliIsraeli LawsLaws andand Decrees.Decrees. ThThee BritishBritish reportsreports toto thethe Permanent Permanent MandateMandate CommissioCommissionn ooff thethe LeagueLeague ofof NationsNations havehave alsoalso beebeenn included,included, sincesince PalestinePalestine waswas assignedassigned ttoo thethe LeaguLeaguee ooff NationsNations,, GreaGreatt BritaiBritainn beinbeingg ththee trustee.trustee. SourcesSources relatinrelatingg toto thethe generalgeneral social,social, demographicdemographic anandd economiceconomic developmentdevelopment ofof PalestinePalestine havehave alsoalso beenbeen included.included. ThThee titlestitles iinn thisthis cataloguecatalogue havhavee beenbeen listedlisted chronologicallychronologically,, aass thithiss seemeseemedd ttoo bebe moremore usefuluseful foforr thethe researcher.researcher. CoveCoverr illustrationillustration:: Churchill,Churchill, T.ET.E.. LawrenceLawrence anandd AmiAmirr AbdullahAbdullah atat thethe JerusalemJerusalem JubileJubileee parade,parade, Jerusalem,Jerusalem, 1935;1935; Lt.Lt. Col.Col. F.GF.G.. PeakePeake anandd thethe ConferenceConference 1921.1921. PhotographPhotograph byby thethe MatsonMatson PhotoPhoto Service.Service. AraArabb LegionLegion marchingmarching paspastt SiSirr ArthuArthurr Wauchope.Wauchope. FroFromm IDC'sIDC's microfichemicrofiche projectproject:: PhotoPhoto:: SaundersSaunders collectioncollection,, MiddlMiddlee EastEast CentreCentre,, StSt.. Antony'sAntony's HistoricaHistoricall PhotographsPhotographs ofof thethe MiddleMiddle EastEast CollegeCollege,, OxforOxfordd UniversityUniversity.. LisListt ooff workworkss selecteselectedd foforr ththee microfichmicrofichee projecprojectt 8989 titlestitles AlAlll titletitless cacann bbee purchasepurchasedd individuallindividuallyy CorrespondencCorrespondencee respectinrespectingg ththee Turco-EgyptianTurco-Egyptian PALESTINE.PALESTINE. AnAn InterimInterim ReportRepor ton o nthe th Civile Civil frontiefrontierr inin thethe SinaiSinai peninsulapeninsula.. WithWith a map.map. AdministrationAdministration ofof Palestine, Palestine, duringduring thethe periodperiod JulJulyy 1906.1906. EgyptEgypt no.no. 2.2. London,London, H.M.S.O.,H.M.S.O., 1s1stt JulyJuly,, 19201920 -30t-30thh JuneJune,, 1921.1921. London,London, 1906.1906. Cd.Cd. 3006.3006. 19211921.. CmdCmd.. 1499.1499. KJ-28-62/1KJ-28-62/1 KJ-28-191/KJ-28-191 /11 BriefBrief RecordRecord ooff thethe AdvanceAdvance ofof thethe [Britis[British]h ] GREAGREATT BRITAINBRITAIN.. CabineCabinett Secretariat.Secretariat. MandatMandatee EgyptianEgyptian ExpeditionaryExpeditionary ForcForcee iinn [Palestine],[Palestine], foforr Palestine.Palestine. LetteLetterr frofromm thethe SecretarySecretary toto thethe Se-Se- JulJulyy 19171917 -- OctoberOctober 1919.1919. Cairo,Cairo, 1919.1919. cretary-Generalcretary-General ooff thethe LeagueLeague ofof NationsNations ofof JulyJuly KJ-28-166/KJ-28-166/11 SfrSfr 2222 1,1, 1922,1922, ...... iinn replreplyy toto CardinalCardinal Gasparri'sGasparri's letteletterr ooff MaMayy 15,15, 1922.1922. London,London, 1922.1922. Cmd.Cmd. 1708.1708. ThThee Feisal-WeizmaFeisal-Weizmann Agreement Agreement.. [Januar[Januaryy 33] ],, KJ-28-65/KJ-28-65/11 1919.1919. KJ-28-165/ 11 GREAGREATT BRITAIN.BRITAIN. ColonialColonial Office.Office. ReportReport onon PalestinPalestinee AdministrationAdministration,, JulyJuly 19201920 -- DecemberDecember ProclamationsProclamations,, OrdinanceOrdinancess andand Notices.Notices. IssuedIssued 19211921.. LondonLondon,, 1922.1922. bbyy O(cuppiedO(cuppied E(nemy)E(nemy) T(erritory)T(erritory) A(dministra-A(dministra- KJ-28-124/ 11 tiontion)) (Sout(Southh ttoo AugusAugustt 19191919.. Cairo,Cairo, 1920.1920. 5151 pp.pp. KJ-28-163/KJ-28-163/11 GREATGREAT BRITAIN.BRITAIN. MandatMandatee forfor Palestine,Palestine, togethetogetherr witwithh a NoteNote byby thethe Secretary-GeneralSecretary-General relatingrelating toto TreatTreatyy ofof PeacePeace withwith Turkey.Turkey. Sevres,Sèvres, AugustAugust 10,10, itsits ApplicationApplication toto thethe TerritoryTerritory knownknown asas Trans-Trans- 19201920.. LondonLondon,, HMSO,HMSO, 1920.1920. Cmd.Cmd. 964.964. Jordan.Jordan. London,London, December,December, 1922.1922 .11 11 pp. pp.Cmd.1785 Cmd.1785.. KJ-28-167/1KJ-28-167/1 KJ-28-66/ 11 GREAGREATT BRITAIN.BRITAIN. ColonialColonial Office.Office. TheThe Adminis-Adminis- GREAGREATT BRITAIN.BRITAIN. Palestine.Palestine. CorrespondenceCorrespondence witwithh tratiotrationn ofof PalestinePalestine andand TransjordanTransjordan.. ReportReport.. 1920-1920- thethe PalestinePalestine ArabArab DelegatioDelegationn anandd ththee ZionisZionistt 1938.1938. 1818 vols.vols. Organisation.Organisation. LondonLondon,, 1922.1922. 3131 pppp.. Cmd.Cmd. 1700.1700. KJ-28-107/ 11 KJ-28-67/1KJ-28-67/1 Franco-BritishFranco-British ConventioConventionn ooff DecembeDecemberr 2323,, 1920,1920, MandateMandate foforr Palestine.Palestine. SomeSome ObjectionsObjections Answered.Answered. oonn CertainCertain PointPointss ConnectedConnected withwith thethe MandateMandatess LondonLondon,, ZionistZionist Organization,Organization, 1922.1922. 1616 pp.pp. forfor SyriaSyria anandd ththee LebanonLebanon,, PalestinePalestine andand Mesopo-Mesopo- KJ-28-128/ 11 tamiatamia.. LondonLondon,, 1921.1921. Cmd.Cmd. 1195.1195. KJ-28-168/1KJ-28-168/1 Moslem-ChristiaMoslem-Christiann CaseCase AgainsAgainstt ZionisZionistt Aggression.Aggression. OfficiaOfficiall StatemenStatementt bbyy thethe PalestinPalestinee ArabArab DelegationDelegation.. GREAGREATT BRITAIN.BRITAIN. ColonialColonial Office.Office. PalestinePalestine.. [London[London,, 1922].1922]. 1111 pp.pp. DisturbancesDisturbances iinn May,May, 19211921.. ReportReportss ooff thethe KJ-28-126/ 11 CommissioCommissionn ooff InquirInquiryy witwithh CorrespondenceCorrespondence RelatingRelating TheretoThereto.. PresentedPresented toto ParliamentParliament byby PALESTINEPALESTINE.. ReporReportt anandd generalgeneral abstractabstractss ooff commandcommand ofof HisHis MajestyMajesty.. LondonLondon,, OctoberOctober 1921.1921. ththee censuscensus ooff 1922.1922. Jerusalem,Jerusalem, 1922.1922. 6464pp pp.. Cmd.Cmd. 1540.1540. KJ-28-170/ 11 KJ-28-63/ 1 PalestinePalestine OrdeOrderr inin CouncilCouncil,, 19221922.. StatutoryStatutory RulesRules PALESTINEPALESTINE.. GovernmenGovernmentt ofof Palestine.Palestine. Commit-Commit- andand OrdersOrders nono.. 1282.1282. London,London, 1922.1922. teetee forfor MoslemMoslem religiousreligious affairsaffairs.. [Jerusalem][Jerusalem],, 19211921. KJ-28-169/1KJ-28-169/1 2323pp pp.. KJ-28-64/1KJ-28-64/1 M TrutTruthh AboutAbout Palestine.Palestine. A ReplReplyy ttoo thethe PalestinPalestinee TwoTwo MemorandaMemoranda submittesubmittedd ttoo thethe CouncilCouncil andand AraArabb Delegation.Delegation. LondonLondon,, ZionistZionist Organization,Organization, PermanentPermanent CommissioCommissionn ooff thethe LeagueLeague ofof Nations,Nations, 19221922.. 2020pp pp.. byby thethe ExecutivExecutivee CommitteCommitteee ofof thethe PalestinePalestine KJ-28-127/1KJ-28-127/1 ArabArab Congress.Congress. JerusalemJerusalem,, ApriAprill 12,12, 1925.1925. Jerusalem,Jerusalem, [[1925] 1925 ].. 3232 pp.pp. PALESTINE.PALESTINE. ThThee EstablishmenEstablishmentt iinn PalestinPalestinee ooff KJ-28-172/KJ-28-172/11 ththee JewishJewish NationalNational Home.Home. MemorandaMemoranda ...... byby thethe JewishJewish AgencAgencyy foforr PalestinPalestinee ttoo thethe Secretary-Secretary- AgreementAgreement betweebetweenn PalestinePalestine anandd SyriSyriaa anandd ththee GeneralGeneral ooff ththee LeagueLeague ooff NationNationss foforr thethe informa-informa- LebanonLebanon
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ORIGINS of the PALESTINE MANDATE by Adam Garfinkle
    NOVEMBER 2014 ORIGINS OF THE PALESTINE MANDATE By Adam Garfinkle Adam Garfinkle, Editor of The American Interest Magazine, served as the principal speechwriter to Secretary of State Colin Powell. He has also been editor of The National Interest and has taught at Johns Hopkins University’s School for Advanced International Studies (SAIS), the University of Pennsylvania, Haverford College and other institutions of higher learning. An alumnus of FPRI, he currently serves on FPRI’s Board of Advisors. This essay is based on a lecture he delivered to FPRI’s Butcher History Institute on “Teaching about Israel and Palestine,” October 25-26, 2014. A link to the the videofiles of each lecture can be found here: http://www.fpri.org/events/2014/10/teaching-about- israel-and-palestine Like everything else historical, the Palestine Mandate has a history with a chronological beginning, a middle, and, in this case, an end. From a strictly legal point of view, that beginning was September 29, 1923, and the end was midnight, May 14, 1948, putting the middle expanse at just short of 25 years. But also like everything else historical, it is no simple matter to determine either how far back in the historical tapestry to go in search of origins, or how far to lean history into its consequences up to and speculatively beyond the present time. These decisions depend ultimately on the purposes of an historical inquiry and, whatever historical investigators may say, all such inquiries do have purposes, whether recognized, admitted, and articulated or not. A.J.P. Taylor’s famous insistence that historical analysis has no purpose other than enlightened storytelling, rendering the entire enterprise much closer to literature than to social science, is interesting precisely because it is such an outlier perspective among professional historians.
    [Show full text]
  • TITLE the Implementation of the Balfour Declaration and the British Mandate in Palestine: Proble
    https://research.stmarys.ac.uk/ TITLE The implementation of the Balfour Declaration and the British Mandate in Palestine: problems of conquest and colonisation at the nadir of British Imperialism (1917–1936) AUTHOR Regan, Bernard DATE DEPOSITED 13 April 2016 This version available at https://research.stmarys.ac.uk/id/eprint/1009/ COPYRIGHT AND REUSE Open Research Archive makes this work available, in accordance with publisher policies, for research purposes. VERSIONS The version presented here may differ from the published version. For citation purposes, please consult the published version for pagination, volume/issue and date of publication. The Implementation of the Balfour Declaration and the British Mandate in Palestine: problems of con- quest and colonisation at the nadir of British Imperi- alism (1917–1936) Regan, Bernard (2016) The Implementation of the Balfour Dec- laration and the British Mandate in Palestine: problems of con- quest and colonisation at the nadir of British Imperialism (1917– 1936) University of Surrey Version: PhD thesis Copyright and Moral Rights for the articles on this site are retained by the individ- ual authors and/or other copyright owners. For more information on Open- Research Archive’s data policy on reuse of materials please consult http:// research.stmarys.ac.uk/policies.html http://research.stmarys.ac.uk/ The Implementation of the Balfour Declaration and the British Mandate in Palestine: problems of conquest and colonisation at the nadir of British Imperialism (1917–1936) Thesis submitted by Bernard Regan For the award of Doctor of Philosophy School of Arts and Humanities University of Surrey January 2016 ©Bernard Regan 2016 1 Summary The objective of this thesis is to analyse the British Mandate in Palestine with a view to developing a new understanding of the interconnections and dissonances between the principal agencies.
    [Show full text]
  • Mandate for Palestine
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NOTES 12 LEAGUE OF NATIONS. ____________________ MANDATE FOR PALESTINE TOGETHER WITH A NOTE BY THE SECRETARY - GENERAL RELATING TO ITS APPLICATION TO THE TERRITORY KNOWN AS TRANS-JORDAN, under the provisions of Article 25 Presented to Parliament by Command of His Majesty, December, 1922. LONDON: PUBLISHED BY HIS MAJESTY’S STATIONERY OFFICE To be purchased through any Bookseller or directly from H.M. STATIONERY OFFICE at the following addresses: IMPERIAL HOUSE, KINGSWAY, LONDON, W.C.2. and 28, ABINGDON STREET, LONDON, S.W.1; 37, PETER STREET, MANCHESTER; 1, ST. ANDREW’S CRESENT, CARDIFF; or 24, FOURTH STREET, EDINBURGH. Cmd. 1785 13 MANDATE FOR PALESTINE, together with a Note by the Secretary-General relating to its application to the Territory known as Trans- Jordan, under the provisions of Article 25. ____________________ MANDATE FOR PALESTINE ____________________ The Council of the League of Nations: Whereas the Principal Allied Powers have agreed, for the purpose of giving effect to the provisions of Article 22 of the Covenant of the League of Nations, to entrust to a Mandatory selected by the said Powers the administration of the territory of Palestine, which formerly belonged to the Turkish Empire, within such boundaries as may be fixed by them; and Whereas the Principal Allied Powers have also agreed that the Mandatory should be responsible for putting into effect the declaration originally made on November 2nd, 1917, by the Government of His Britannic Majesty, and adopted by the said Powers, in favor of
    [Show full text]
  • Legacies of the Anglo-Hashemite Relationship in Jordan
    Legacies of the Anglo-Hashemite Relationship in Jordan: How this symbiotic alliance established the legitimacy and political longevity of the regime in the process of state-formation, 1914-1946 An Honors Thesis for the Department of Middle Eastern Studies Julie Murray Tufts University, 2018 Acknowledgements The writing of this thesis was not a unilateral effort, and I would be remiss not to acknowledge those who have helped me along the way. First of all, I would like to thank my advisor, Professor Thomas Abowd, for his encouragement of my academic curiosity this past year, and for all his help in first, making this project a reality, and second, shaping it into (what I hope is) a coherent and meaningful project. His class provided me with a new lens through which to examine political history, and gave me with the impetus to start this paper. I must also acknowledge the role my abroad experience played in shaping this thesis. It was a research project conducted with CET that sparked my interest in political stability in Jordan, so thank you to Ines and Dr. Saif, and of course, my classmates, Lensa, Matthew, and Jackie, for first empowering me to explore this topic. I would also like to thank my parents and my brother, Jonathan, for their continuous support. I feel so lucky to have such a caring family that has given me the opportunity to pursue my passions. Finally, a shout-out to the gals that have been my emotional bedrock and inspiration through this process: Annie, Maya, Miranda, Rachel – I love y’all; thanks for listening to me rant about this all year.
    [Show full text]
  • PALESTINE: TERMINATION of the MANDATE 15 May 1948
    PALESTINE: TERMINATION OF THE MANDATE 15 May 1948 [Statement prepared for public information by the Colonial Office and Foreign Office, His Majesty's Stationery Office] His Majesty's Government in the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland will cease to be responsible for the administration of Palestine from midnight on 14th May, 1948. The ending of thirty years of British rule in Palestine, begun when General Allenby's troop occupied that country towards the close of the first world war, provides a fitting occasion for a brief review of its history and of the policy pursued by His Majesty's Government. I. The Origin and Nature of the British Mandate for Palestine The Mandate for Palestine was assigned to His Majesty by the Supreme Council of the Allied Powers in 1920, was approved by the League of Nations in 1922 and took effect in 1923, when the Treaty of Lausanne formally ended the war between the Allied Powers and the Ottoman Empire, in which Palestine had previously been included. To implement this Mandate, His Majesty's Government set up in Palestine an Administration comprising a British High Commissioner, appointed by and responsible to the Colonial Office, assisted by an Advisory Council nominated by him from his officials. These, together with the police and judiciary, were initially mainly British, but, in the civil service, British subjects were gradually replace by Arabs and Jews in all but the most senior appointments. The Administration was supported by a British garrison. With this mandate His Majesty's Government accepted certain obligations, which are set out in two documents: the Covenant of the League of Nations and the Mandate for Palestine.
    [Show full text]
  • The-Balfour-Declaration-Lookstein-Center.Pdf
    The Balfour Declaration - November 2, 1917 Celebrating 100 Years There are those who believe that the Balfour Declaration was the most magnanimous (generous) gesture by an imperial nation. Others believe it was the biggest error of judgment that a world power could make. In this unit, we will discover: What was the Balfour Declaration Why the Balfour Declaration was so important How the Balfour Declaration is relevant today 1. Which of the following Declarations have you heard of? a) The United States Declaration of Independence, 1776 b) The Irish Declaration of Independence, 1917 c) The Balfour Declaration, 1917 d) The Israeli Declaration of Independence, 1948 e) The Austrian Declaration of Neutrality, 1955 What was the Balfour Declaration? The Balfour Declaration was a letter written in the name of the British government, by Lord Arthur James Balfour, Britain’s Foreign Secretary, to the leaders of the Zionist Federation. 2. Read the letter: Dear Lord Rothschild, I have much pleasure in conveying to you, on behalf of His Majesty’s Government, the following declaration of sympathy with Jewish Zionist aspirations which has been submitted to, and approved by, the Cabinet. “His Majesty’s Government view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavours to facilitate the achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country.” I should be grateful if you would bring this declaration to the knowledge of the Zionist Federation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Balfour Declaration from the Perspective of the Palestinian People Rashid Khalidi, Columbia University It Is a Great Honor T
    United Nations, November 2, 2017 The Balfour Declaration from the Perspective of the Palestinian People Rashid Khalidi, Columbia University It is a great honor to be asked to speak here on the 100th anniversary of the Balfour Declaration. I am grateful to HE Ambassador Fodé Seck of Senegal, Chair of the Committee on the Exercise of the Inalienable Rights of the Palestinian People, to the Committee, to the chair today, HE Ambassador Jerry Matjila of South Africa, and to the dedicated staff of the UN Secretariat for making this event possible. It is particularly fitting to be speaking today at the United Nations, which has played such a large role in the Palestine tragedy. Today I will be addressing the impact on the Palestinian people of the Balfour Declaration, and of the League of Nations mandate based upon it. I can only hope that if we can all become more aware of this historical background, the United Nations may be able to address the harm caused by this Declaration, and all that followed, more fairly and effectively than it has done over the past 70 years. The momentous statement made on behalf of the British cabinet on November 2, 1917 by Arthur James Balfour, His Majesty’s Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs, is usually regarded in light of British imperial interests, or in terms of its ostensible subject, a “national home for the Jewish people.” We know a great deal about Britain’s commitment to Zionism. We know less about what the support of the British Empire via this declaration meant for the aims of the Zionist movement – which for nearly half a century proudly described itself as a colonial endeavor, and which at the same time was a national movement in the making.
    [Show full text]
  • Mandate for Palestine” the Legal Aspects of Jewish Rights to a National Home in Palestine Eli E
    “Mandate for Palestine” The legal aspects of Jewish rights to a National Home in Palestine Eli E. Hertz 1920 - Original territory assigned to the Jewish National Home 1922 - Final territory assigned to the Jewish National Home © 2007, Eli E. Hertz 1 Mandate For Palestine “In Palestine as of right and not on sufferance ...” “When it is asked what is meant by the development of the Jewish National Home in Palestine, it may be answered that it is not the imposition of a Jewish nationality upon the inhabitants of Palestine as a whole, but the further development of the existing Jewish community, with the assistance of Jews in other parts of the world, in order that it may become a centre in which the Jewish people as a whole may take, on grounds of religion and race, an interest and a pride. But in order that this community should have the best prospect of free development and provide a full opportunity for the Jewish people to display its capacities, it is essential that it should know that it is in Palestine as of right and not on sufferance. That is the reason why it is necessary that the existence of a Jewish National Home in Palestine should be internationally guaranteed and that it should be formally recognized to rest upon ancient historic connection.” Winston Churchill British Secretary of State for the Colonies June 1922 Copyright © 2007 Myths and Facts, Inc. and Eli E. Hertz ISBN 10: 0-9741804-2-4 Library of Congress Control Number: 2007930693 Published by: Myths and Facts, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Britain in Palestine (1917-1948) - Occupation, the Palestine Mandate, and International Law
    ARTICLES & ESSAYS https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2531-6133/7663 Britain in Palestine (1917-1948) - Occupation, the Palestine Mandate, and International Law † PATRICK C. R. TERRY TABLE OF CONTENTS: 1. Introduction; 2. The Balfour Declaration; 2.1. The Letter; 2.2. Background; 2.3. Controversies Surrounding the Balfour Declaration; 2.3.1. The “Too Much Promised” Land; 2.3.1.1. Sykes-Picot-Agreement (1916); 2.3.1.2. Mcmahon- Hussein Correspondence (1915/1916); 2.3.2. International Legal Status of the Balfour Declaration; 2.3.3. Interpretation of The Text; 3. British Occupation of Palestine (1917- 1923); 4. The Palestine Mandate; 4.1. The Mandates System; 4.1.1. Self-Determination and President Wilson; 4.1.2. Covenant of The League of Nations; 4.1.2.1. Article 22; 4.1.2.2. Sovereignty; 4.1.2.3. Assessment; 4.1.3. President Wilson’s Concept of Self- Determination and The Covenant; 4.2. The Palestine Mandate in Detail; 4.2.1. First Decisions; 4.2.2. Turkey; 4.2.3. The Mandate’s Provisions; 4.2.4. The Mandate’s Legality; 4.2.4.1. Self-Determination; 4.2.4.2. Article 22 (4) Covenant of The League of Nations; 4.2.4.3. Other Violations of International Law; 5. Conclusion. ABSTRACT: At a time when there are not even negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians in order to resolve their longstanding dispute, this article seeks to explain the origins of the conflict by examining Britain’s conduct in Palestine from 1917-1948, first as an occupier, then as the responsible mandatory, under international law.
    [Show full text]
  • Palestinian Self-Determination": Possible Futures for the Unallocated Territories of the Palestine Mandate
    . "PALESTINIAN SELF-DETERMINATION": POSSIBLE FUTURES FOR THE UNALLOCATED TERRITORIES OF THE PALESTINE MANDATE Eugene V. Rostow Slowly and reluctantly, Europe and the United States are coming to realize that the pattern of events in the Middle East reflects more than random turbulence in the aftermath of the British and French Empires. For nearly thirty turbulent years, the Soviet Union has sought control of this geo-political nerve center in order to bring Western Europe into its sphere. Even if Soviet ambitions were confined to Europe, Soviet hege- mony in the Middle East would profoundly change the world balance of power. But Soviet control of the Mid- dle East would lead inevitably to further accretions of Soviet power if China, Japan, and many smaller and more vulnerable countries should conclude that the United States had lost the will or the capacity to defend its vital interests, and that sauve qui peut, and devil take the hindmost, had therefore become the order of the day.1 The exploitation of Arab hostility to the Balfour Declaration, the Palestine Mandate, and the existence of Israel has been a major weapon in the Soviet campaign to * Sterling Professor of Law and Public Affairs, Yale Law School. The research assistance of Mark C. Del Bianco, Yale Law School, Class of 1980, is warmly acknowledged. 1. In all countries, and especially in the NATO countries, Japan and China, there are significant advocates of accommodation with the Soviet Union. Many believe in that policy at nearly any price. The influence of such opinions has increased automatically as the West has allowed what the Soviets call "the correlation of forces" to become unfavorable.
    [Show full text]
  • VISIONS of the MIDDLE EAST in LEGAL and the Article Traces a Set
    REINVENTING A REGION (1915-1922): VISIONS OF THE MIDDLE EAST IN LEGAL AND DIPLOMATIC TEXTS LEADING TO THE PALESTINE MANDATE KARIN LOEVY The article traces a set of regional images in international legal documents leading to the establishment of the Palestine Mandate (1915-1922). The analysis suggests that at that important crossroad, when a new world order was imagined and negotiated, a broad, layered and diverse vision of a comprehensive ‘region’ was actively present in the minds of very different actors within the framework of empire. A vast territory was reconstructed as opening up for new ways of rule and of influence, for enhanced development and for dealing with strictly European globalized problems. That this powerful regional vision has been disregarded because of the weight of the subsequent territorial geopolitics in the Middle East is not surprising. Today, however, when classic international law responses – the state on the one hand and international cooperation on the other - prove weak and unstable and especially vulnerable to “new regional threats,” it may be worthwhile to look back at a period in which the region was still imagined as a place of political possibility. Keywords: Regional Order; Middle East History; Sykes Picot Agreement; Balfour Declaration; Article 22 of the Covenant of the League of Nations; Palestine Mandate. Table of Contents 1. Introduction - A Forgotten Regional Moment 2. The McMahon-Hussein Correspondence - A Vast Territory Opening Up for Rule 3. The Sykes-Picot Agreement - A Region Opening up for Development 4. The Balfour Declaration – A New Home for a European Problem 5. Article 22 of the Covenant - Legalizing Imperial Spheres of Influence 6.
    [Show full text]
  • The Israel-Palestine Conflict in International Law: Territorial Issues Scobbie and Hibbin
    T The Israel-Palestine h e I s r a e l - P Conflict a l e s t i n e C in International Law: o n f l i c t i n Territorial Issues I n t e r n a t i o n a l L a w : T e r r i t o r i a l I s s u e s Iain Scobbie with Sarah Hibbin and an Introduction by Henry Siegman S c o b U.S./Middle East Project b i e and a n d the Sir Joseph Hotung Programme for Law, Human H i Rights and Peace Building in the Middle East, School b b i n of Oriental and African Studies, University of London The Israel­Palestine Conflict in International Law: Territorial Issues Iain Scobbie with Sarah Hibbin Introduction by Henry Siegman The U.S./Middle East Project and The Sir Joseph Hotung Programme for Law, Human Rights and Peace Building in the Middle East School of Oriental and African Studies University of London Copyright © 2009 by the U.S./Middle East Project. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. This report may be quoted or reproduced, provided the appropriate credit is given to the authors of this report and to the sponsoring organizations. The Sir Joseph Hotung Programme for Law, Human Rights and Peace Building in the Middle East works to highlight and promote the use of international law and human rights in respect to the engagement of all parties, including third States, to Israeli‐Palestinian relations.
    [Show full text]