DOCSLIB.ORG

Police Powers: Protest David Mead

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Police Powers: Protest David Mead BRIEFING PAPER Number 5013, 19 May 2021 By Jennifer Brown Police powers: protest David Mead Contents: 1. Legislation 2. Police tactics 3. 2009: A landmark year for the policing of protests 4. Recent legislative reform 5. Proposals to amend the police powers www.parliament.uk/commons-library | intranet.parliament.uk/commons-library | [email protected] | @commonslibrary 2 Police powers: protest Contents Summary 3 1. Legislation 4 1.1 Human rights 4 1.2 Police powers 5 1.3 Offences 7 1.4 Injunctions and orders 10 2. Police tactics 12 2.1 Planning 12 2.2 During a protest 13 2.3 Review 16 3. 2009: A landmark year for the policing of protests 17 3.1 Events at the G20 summit 17 3.2 Recommendations 21 4. Recent legislative reform 23 4.1 Decriminalising ‘insulting’ language 23 4.2 Amending ‘no suspicion’ stop and search powers in Terrorism Act 2000 24 4.3 Relaxing the rules for protests around Parliament 25 5. Proposals to amend the police powers 26 5.1 Why are the Government proposing to amend the 1986 Act? 27 5.2 What impact might the proposals have? 30 5.3 Recent protests 31 Contributing Authors: David Mead, Proposals to amend the police powers, Section 5 Protest march London 2018 by David Holt. Licensed under CC BY 2.0 / image cropped. 3 Commons Library Briefing, 19 May 2021 Summary Current Law The right to peacefully protest is protected under the European Convention of Human Rights. Articles 10 and 11 of the Convention protect an individual’s right to freedom of expression and assembly. Together they safeguard the right to peaceful protest. However, these rights are not absolute, and the state can implement laws which restrict the right to protest to maintain public order. In the UK several pieces of legislation provide a framework for the policing of protests. The Public Order Act 1986 provides the police with powers to place restrictions on protests and, in some cases, prohibit those which threaten to cause serious disruption to public order. There is also an array of criminal offences which could apply to protestors including aggravated trespass and obstruction of a highway. In addition to the relevant criminal law there are civil remedies that can be used to disrupt protests. Provisions in the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 allow individuals and organisations to apply for civil injunctions to prevent protestors from demonstrating in a way which causes harm or harassment. Reform to police tactics in the early 2010s Following criticism of the police’s approach at the G20 protests in 2009 there was reform of policing tactics at protests. The police were criticised for their use of force and for not facilitating constructive dialogue with the G20 protestors. Partly in response to this criticism, the current police guidance emphasises that officers should start from a presumption of peaceful protests. It advocates for the use force only as a last resort and advises officers to maintain open communication with protestors before, during and after a demonstration. Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill Recent protests have raised some questions about the current framework for policing demonstrations. Some have argued that police powers against protestors should be strengthened. Stronger legislation, it is argued, could enable the police to intervene more robustly against peaceful protests that cause lengthy and serious disruption. In response to these concerns the Government has introduced new legislation to strengthen the police powers. Part 3 of the Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill (the PCSC Bill) would make major changes to the way protests are policed in England and Wales. It would (amongst other things) significantly amend the police powers in the Public Order Act 1986 to impose conditions on protests. The Bill is currently making its way through Parliament. It’s Committee Stage started on 18 May 2021. The Library has provided clause by clause analysis of the whole of Part 3 of the Bill in its briefing for 2nd Reading. 4 Police powers: protest 1. Legislation The right to peacefully protest is a corner stone of a liberal democratic society. In the UK this right is protected under the European Convention of Human Rights. However, the right is not absolute, and restrictions can be imposed on protests in order to maintain public order. The Public Order Act 1986 (as amended) is the main piece of legislation that provides the police with powers to restrict protests. However, there are many more pieces of legislation which contain provisions associated with protest. 1.1 Human rights The right to freedom of expression and assembly are fundamental aspects of a liberal democratic society. These rights ensure that people have the freedom to peacefully protest. Articles 10 and 11 of the European Convention of Human Rights (ECHR) provide for these rights. Article 10 of the ECHR provides for the right to “freedom of expression”. It states that individuals have: freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impart information and ideas without interference by public authority and regardless of frontiers.1 Article 11 provides for the “freedom of peaceful assembly and freedom of association with others”.2 The UK is a signatory of the ECHR and therefore obliged to ensure that ECHR rights are protected. UK citizens can take cases to the European Court of Human Rights if they think their convention rights have been breached and they have exhausted any potential domestic remedies. The Human Rights Act 1998 gave domestic effect to the ECHR. This means that individuals can bring claims based on breaches of Convention rights before the UK courts. Schedule 1 of the Act sets out the Articles of the Convention. Section 2 of the Act requires UK courts to ‘take account’ of judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) when considering a claim concerning Convention rights. However, the UK courts are not bound to follow judgments of the ECtHR. The rights to freedom of expression and assembly guaranteed by Articles 10 and 11 are ‘qualified rights’ rather than ‘absolute rights’. This means that interference with these rights may be justified if the basis for doing so is clearly set out by the law; it is necessary in pursuit of a legitimate aim; and the interference is proportionate to that aim. Legitimate grounds for restricting these rights include national security or public safety; the prevention or crime or disorder; and, the protection of the rights and freedoms of others. Police powers to restrict protests must therefore be exercised in a way that is proportionate to one of these aims in order to be compatible 1 European Convention on Human Rights, Article 10 2 Ibid, Article 11 5 Commons Library Briefing, 19 May 2021 with the ECHR. This includes a positive duty to protect those exercising their right to protest peacefully.3 1.2 Police powers Part II of Public Order Act 1986 provides police with powers to manage protests. The Act classifies two types of protest: a ‘public procession’ and a ‘public assembly’. A ‘public procession’ is a protest march intended to demonstrate support or opposition for a particular view, publicise a campaign or commemorate an event.4 Processions that are “commonly or customarily” held in a certain area are excluded from the definition. A ‘public assembly’ is a gathering of “two or more people that is wholly or partly open to the air” (essentially, gatherings which are outside).5 This briefing will use the term static protest when referring to the concept of ‘public assembly’ as defined in the Public Order Act 1986.6 Police powers associated with protest marches and static protests are similar. However, there are stronger powers to police protest marches. The 1986 Act provides the police with three powers: • It requires individuals to notify the police when they are planning a protest march. • It allows the police to request a protest march is prohibited if they have a serious public order concern. The police have more limited powers to request certain types of static protests are prohibited. • It allows the police to impose conditions on any protests they suspect will cause serious damage to property, serious disruption or will incite unlawful behaviour. Notifications Section 11 of the Public Order Act 1986 requires those organising a protest march to notify the police. The notice must specify the date, time and route of the proposed march and provide the police with the details of those who are organising it. The 1986 Act requires the notice to be given six days prior to the march unless it is “not reasonably practicable”.7 There is no requirement to notify the police of plans to conduct a static protest. It is an offence to organise (not to take part in) a protest march without notifying the police. It is also an offence for the organiser to change the route, date and time of a march once the police have been notified. Those convicted of these offences can be fined.8 3 Ibid 4 s11(1), Public Order Act 1986 5 s16, Public Order Act 1986 [as amended by s57, Anti-social Behaviour Act 2003] 6 The term static protest is used frequently in official guidance documents. The consist use of the term ‘static protest’ is used in this paper to avoid confusion. 7 s11(2) and s11(6), Public Order Act 1986 8 s11(7) and s11(10), Public Order Act 1986 6 Police powers: protest The government has provided some advice on notifying the police of a protest march on their website Protests and marches: letting the police know. Most police forces also provide information on their websites.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Build the Movement for a Green New Deal
    Build the Movement for a Green New Deal Whereas: The Green New Deal manifests key UU values — both “the interdependent web” and “justice, equity, and compassion”— sparking intense interest. However, this vision will require in-depth organizing and generational dedication to overcome powerful interests who disregard the scientific consensus that massive disruption lies ahead if we don’t take rapid action to address the escalating climate emergency; Whereas: Our earth has already warmed approximately 1°C, while climate catastrophes, such as flooding, droughts, wildfires, hurricanes, and species die-off, are more frequent and costly, with ballooning waves of refugees, as carbon emissions from fossil fuels are now activating powerful feedback loops in the air, oceans, and on land; Whereas: Many natural resources, such as fisheries, forests, agricultural lands, fresh water, and minerals, are being degraded or wasted by continued global economic and population growth; Whereas: Social and political stress from escalating economic and political failure is undermining popular support for democracy and human rights, especially where short-sighted economic pursuits have prevailed over equity and compassion; Whereas: Equity must replace extravagance in this new gilded age, reeling from two generations of escalating inequality, consumerism, and continued militarization, by transferring dignity and ownership to legions of proud and skilled workers to build a new and sustainable infrastructure; Be it Resolved that the Unitarian Universalist Association, its congregations, and their members are urged to: 1. Continue educating ourselves on the accelerating threats to the ecosystems and natural resources which feed and sustain our global civilization, and promote a compassionate national conversation to head off worst-case scenarios; 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Viewpoint: Extinction Rebellion: Radical Or Rational?
    Life & Times Viewpoint streets of Hackney dressed as bees. Extinction Rebellion: We arrived nervously at Marble Arch radical or rational? on the first day of the Rebellion, not really knowing what to expect and how long we The UK government has declared a climate would stay. I was taken aback by the calm, 1 change emergency. Respected fellow GPs welcoming atmosphere and the respectful have been arrested on actions with Extinction behaviour towards the police and vice Rebellion. Initially I was perplexed by this versa. There was a palpable feeling that we and wondered how they came to take this did have agency to make decisions about course of action. Although I have friends who our future and we could act to create the have tried to fly less and become vegan for type of world we all want to live in. environmental purposes, I had never really We kept coming back to the road given serious thought to climate change blockades. We played football on the four- and its consequences, let alone participate lane roundabout of Marble Arch and we in any climate activism. I’m not really sure turned Waterloo Bridge into a playground. I have rebelled in many things in my life at As we cycled blissfully through the clean, “There was a palpable all. Over the Easter holidays, though, I found quiet streets of a car-free Central London, myself repeatedly at Extinction Rebellion’s the impossible suddenly seemed possible. feeling that we did have blockades in Central London with my young The youth climate marches led by Greta agency to make decisions son and husband (a paediatric trainee).
    [Show full text]
  • Smart Policing How the Metropolitan Police Service Can Make Better Use of Technology
    Budget and Performance Committee Smart policing How the Metropolitan Police Service can make better use of technology August 2013 ©Greater London Authority August 2013 Budget and Performance Committee Members John Biggs (Chair) Labour Stephen Knight (Deputy Chair) Liberal Democrat Gareth Bacon Conservative Darren Johnson Green Joanne McCartney Labour Valerie Shawcross CBE Labour Richard Tracey Conservative Role of the Budget and Performance Committee The Budget and Performance Committee scrutinises the Mayor’s annual budget proposals and holds the Mayor and his staff to account for financial decisions and performance at the GLA. The Committee takes into account in its investigations the cross cutting themes of: the health of persons in Greater London; the achievement of sustainable development in the United Kingdom; and the promotion of opportunity. Contact: Daniel Maton, Budget & Performance Adviser Email: [email protected] Tel: 020 7983 4681 Alastair Cowan, Communications Officer Email: [email protected] Tel: 020 7983 4504 2 Contents Chairman’s foreword 4 Executive Summary 6 1. The current state of technology at the Metropolitan Police Service 8 2. Spending less on Information and Communication Technology 13 3. Making the most of new technology 22 4. Next steps 36 Appendix 1 Recommendations 38 Appendix 2 Views and information 40 Appendix 3 Endnotes 42 Orders and translations 47 3 Chairman’s foreword Like any other organisation the Met is completely reliant on technology to function. And as technology develops, this dependence is set to grow further. Every year the Met spends around £250 million on running its ICT, most of which goes on maintaining out-of-date, ineffective and overly- expensive systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Extinction Rebellion in Aotearoa: the Possibilities and Pitfalls of Importing a Social Movement Organisation Huw Morgan
    Interface: a journal for and about social movements Article Volume 13 (1): 157 – 173 (July 2021) Morgan, Extinction Rebellion in Aoteoroa Extinction Rebellion in Aotearoa: the possibilities and pitfalls of importing a social movement organisation Huw Morgan Abstract As social movement organisations spread across the world in chains of influence and inspiration, local activists have an opportunity to form a branch, capitalise on the international recognition and attract new members. Extinction Rebellion in Aotearoa New Zealand did just this and faced two familiar dilemmas. At the level of strategy, we failed to respond to criticism of our key demand from some indigenous activists. At the tactical level, a lack of cohesion over the organisational structure and tactics at our formation led to a weak organisation unable to successfully engage in complicated strategic or tactical discussion. Key words: climate justice, social movement, decolonisation, organisation, structure, New Zealand, indigenous rights XR in a global context Extinction Rebellion (XR) has been widely written about, including by the co- founder of this journal. What has been less discussed - in mainstream news media and the activist media (Waltz, 2005) of which I’m aware - are the fates of XR groups that have emerged around the world, taking inspiration from, and trying to adapt, the XR model to their context. Globally, the reach of the XR social movement organisation (SMO) was most obviously seen during the 2019 October “Rebellion” - members are called rebels, since XR is in “rebellion” against governments. Across Europe, mobilisations drew consistently upwards of 200 people into action. XR France had hundreds occupying a bridge in central Paris for five days before joining an occupation of a shopping centre with the gilets jaunes, amongst other groups.1 Eastern European XR groups, notably in Prague, experienced 130 arrests for blockades that were quickly and brutally repressed.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 8 Criminal Conduct Offences
    Chapter 8 Criminal conduct offences Page Index 1-8-1 Introduction 1-8-2 Chapter structure 1-8-2 Transitional guidance 1-8-2 Criminal conduct - section 42 – Armed Forces Act 2006 1-8-5 Violence offences 1-8-6 Common assault and battery - section 39 Criminal Justice Act 1988 1-8-6 Assault occasioning actual bodily harm - section 47 Offences against the Persons Act 1861 1-8-11 Possession in public place of offensive weapon - section 1 Prevention of Crime Act 1953 1-8-15 Possession in public place of point or blade - section 139 Criminal Justice Act 1988 1-8-17 Dishonesty offences 1-8-20 Theft - section 1 Theft Act 1968 1-8-20 Taking a motor vehicle or other conveyance without authority - section 12 Theft Act 1968 1-8-25 Making off without payment - section 3 Theft Act 1978 1-8-29 Abstraction of electricity - section 13 Theft Act 1968 1-8-31 Dishonestly obtaining electronic communications services – section 125 Communications Act 2003 1-8-32 Possession or supply of apparatus which may be used for obtaining an electronic communications service - section 126 Communications Act 2003 1-8-34 Fraud - section 1 Fraud Act 2006 1-8-37 Dishonestly obtaining services - section 11 Fraud Act 2006 1-8-41 Miscellaneous offences 1-8-44 Unlawful possession of a controlled drug - section 5 Misuse of Drugs Act 1971 1-8-44 Criminal damage - section 1 Criminal Damage Act 1971 1-8-47 Interference with vehicles - section 9 Criminal Attempts Act 1981 1-8-51 Road traffic offences 1-8-53 Careless and inconsiderate driving - section 3 Road Traffic Act 1988 1-8-53 Driving
    [Show full text]
  • Future Identities: Changing Identities in the UK – the Next 10 Years DR 19: Identity Related Crime in the UK David S
    Future Identities: Changing identities in the UK – the next 10 years DR 19: Identity Related Crime in the UK David S. Wall Durham University January 2013 This review has been commissioned as part of the UK Government’s Foresight project, Future Identities: Changing identities in the UK – the next 10 years. The views expressed do not represent policy of any government or organisation DR19 Identity Related Crime in the UK Contents Identity Related Crime in the UK ............................................................................................................ 3 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 4 2. Identity Theft (theft of personal information) .................................................................................... 6 3. Creating a false identity ...................................................................................................................... 9 4. Committing Identity Fraud ................................................................................................................ 12 5. New forms of identity crime ............................................................................................................. 14 6. The law and identity crime................................................................................................................ 16 7. Conclusions ......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • COMMISSIONER METROPOLITAN POLICE SERVICE Recruitment
    COMMISSIONER METROPOLITAN POLICE SERVICE Recruitment Information About the Metropolitan Police Service The Metropolitan Police Service Founded by Sir Robert Peel in 1829, the Metropolitan Police Service (the Met) is one of the oldest police services in the world. From the beginning, the purpose of the Met has been to serve and protect the people of London by providing a professional police service. This remains our purpose. Today, the Met is made up of more than 43,000 officers and staff, plus thousands of volunteers: we are one of the largest employers in London and South East of England. The territory served covers 620 square miles and is home to over 8.6 million people. The Met is the UK’s largest police force and has 25% of the total police budget for England and Wales. The Met is seen as a world leader in policing. The ‘Scotland Yard’ brand is known around the world as a symbol of quality investigation and traditional values of policing. Thanks to this reputation, Met services are highly sought after, either through using Met officers and staff in operational matters or by training others and giving them the opportunity to learn from their experiences. Policing Our Unique City London is unique: ‘the world under one roof’ and the largest city in Western Europe. Its ever changing population is set to grow towards 9 million by 2020 and become one of the most diverse (culturally, ethnically and linguistically) cities in the world. The complexities of policing a city on this scale are huge. A seat of Parliamentary, Royal and Diplomatic power, London is also centre for protest and a high-profile target for terrorist attack.
    [Show full text]
  • Combatting Online Harassment and Abuse: a Legal Guide for Journalists in England and Wales
    MLA Safety Guide COMBATTING ONLINE HARASSMENT AND ABUSE: A LEGAL GUIDE FOR JOURNALISTS IN ENGLAND AND WALES June 2021 DISCLAIMER: This guide is for educational purposes only. Every situation is different. A person experiencing an online safety threat should listen to their instincts, discuss their concerns with trusted allies and experts in law enforcement or security. This guide is and should not be relied upon as legal advice. Specialist legal advice should be sought based upon the particular circumstances in which it is needed. 1 MLA Safety Guide Acknowledgements This guide has been written by Beth Grossman, a barrister at Doughty Street Chambers specialising in media law. Strategic input has been provided by Caoilfhionn Gallagher QC, a leading expert in international human rights law and the safety of journalists. This guide draws upon her experience of having advised and assisted journalists dealing with online harassment and fearing for their safety. The guide was commissioned by the Media Lawyers’ Association (MLA) and the Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS). The DCMS commissioned this report as part of its commitment to the National Action Plan for Journalists’ Safety. However, the guide is entirely independent of the DCMS. The MLA is an association of in-house media lawyers from newspapers, magazines, book publishers, broadcasters and news agencies. It was formed to promote and protect freedom of expression, and the right to receive and impart information, opinions and ideas. Its members include in-house lawyers from all of the major UK publishers and broadcasters as well as international news organisations. Our thanks go to Cian Murphy,Sophie Argent, Zoe Norden and John Battle for their assistance with the preparation of this guide.
    [Show full text]
  • Issues Paper on Cyber-Crime Affecting Personal Safety, Privacy and Reputation Including Cyber-Bullying (LRC IP 6-2014)
    Issues Paper on Cyber-crime affecting personal safety, privacy and reputation including cyber-bullying (LRC IP 6-2014) BACKGROUND TO THIS ISSUES PAPER AND THE QUESTIONS RAISED This Issues Paper forms part of the Commission’s Fourth Programme of Law Reform,1 which includes a project to review the law on cyber-crime affecting personal safety, privacy and reputation including cyber-bullying. The criminal law is important in this area, particularly as a deterrent, but civil remedies, including “take-down” orders, are also significant because victims of cyber-harassment need fast remedies once material has been posted online.2 The Commission seeks the views of interested parties on the following 5 issues. 1. Whether the harassment offence in section 10 of the Non-Fatal Offences Against the Person Act 1997 should be amended to incorporate a specific reference to cyber-harassment, including indirect cyber-harassment (the questions for which are on page 13); 2. Whether there should be an offence that involves a single serious interference, through cyber technology, with another person’s privacy (the questions for which are on page 23); 3. Whether current law on hate crime adequately addresses activity that uses cyber technology and social media (the questions for which are on page 26); 4. Whether current penalties for offences which can apply to cyber-harassment and related behaviour are adequate (the questions for which are on page 28); 5. The adequacy of civil law remedies to protect against cyber-harassment and to safeguard the right to privacy (the questions for which are on page 35); Cyber-harassment and other harmful cyber communications The emergence of cyber technology has transformed how we communicate with others.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mont Pelerin Society
    A SPECIAL MEETING THE MONT PELERIN SOCIETY JANUARY 15–17, 2020 FROM THE PAST TO THE FUTURE: IDEAS AND ACTIONS FOR A FREE SOCIETY CHAPTER SEVENTEEN THE RISE AND FALL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SOCIALISM: SMASHING THE WATERMELON JEFF BENNETT HOOVER INSTITUTION • STANFORD UNIVERSITY 11 The rise and fall of environmental socialism: Smashing the 1 watermelon Jeff Bennett2 1. The bad news The green gravy train is fully loaded and achieving record speeds. Rent seekers of many different varieties have taken their seats and are enjoying the largess created by the fears of environmental doom and gloom. The current season of bush fires in Australia illustrates the point. The motivating hypothesis for the fear is that climate change is causing earlier and more severe bushfires. Hence this season’s experience (with declarations of ‘catastrophic’ conditions being made for the first time ever followed by reports of ‘unprecedented’ damage) will be ‘the new normal’. Who gets the gravy once on board? 1. The politicians – who can achieve photo opportunities amidst fire ravaged communities and make announcements about immediate support for those impacted and long term interventions to address climate change. 2. The firefighting bureaucrats – who lobby for more equipment and more staff to deal with the climate change ‘emergency’. 3. The press – who get to present reports from areas that look like war zones without being shot at. 4. The scientists – who argue for more research funding to understand better (for example) the impacts of climate change on fire behaviour. 5. The green industrialists – who gain from subsidies paid to encourage the transition to a ‘de- carbonised’ economy.
    [Show full text]
  • Why the Extinction Rebellion Movement Is Morally Justified
    Why the Extinction Rebellion Movement is Morally Justified Article by Jeff Justice June 26, 2019 Extinction Rebellion is part of a global movement that is forcing climate and environmental issues into the mainstream. Their success is based on widespread recognition of the legitimacy of their demands and action – but not before the law, as the first prosecutions of activists in the United Kingdom demonstrate. Jeff Justice draws on political theory and environmental philosophy to argue that when government inaction and irresponsibility puts people’s security at risk, rebellion is justified. Extinction Rebellion (also known as XR) recently stormed onto the environmental protest group scene. Their tactics have included occupying public spaces, displaying large banners on landmarks, and interrupting local council and even parliamentary proceedings from the public galleries with their protests and chants. They have even taken to choking major traffic arteries with large groups of slow moving cyclists and blocking streets and squares through sit-ins. The group is international; its website shows groups on every inhabited continent. It declares itself to be in a state of ‘international non-violent rebellion against the world’s governments for criminal inaction on the ecological crisis’. Extinction Rebellion has three demands: first, that governments tell the truth about the ecological crisis; second, that there be zero emissions and drawdown by 2025; and third, that participatory democracy be established. Whilst the group is indeed global in its outlook and organisation, much of the press to date focuses on activities in the UK where it was founded in 2018 and where most of its chapters currently are.
    [Show full text]
  • Hate Crime: the Case for Extending the Existing Offences
    Hate Crime: the Case for Extending the Existing Offences Law Commission Consultation Paper No 213 Presentation will cover: • ambit of consultation - terms of reference • background - current hate crime regime, E&W law • provisional proposals, reform options, key questions Hate crime offences 2 sets of “hate crime” offences • Aggravated offences: higher maximum sentences where crime involved hostility based on race or religion - Crime and Disorder Act 1998 • Offences of stirring up hatred on grounds of race, religion and sexual orientation - Public Order Act 1986 What is “hate crime”? For police and CPS “hate crime” is any offence perceived by V or another person as motivated by hostility or prejudice based on: • Race • Religion • Sexual orientation • Disability • Transgender identity • (goths, street workers, other regional variations) • Aggravated offences don’t go this wide Statistics – Home Office In 2011/12 there were 43,748 crimes recorded by the police in England and Wales as “hate crimes” – 35,816 (82%) involved race – 1,621 (4%) involved religion – 1,744 (4%) involved disability – 4,252 (10%) involved sexual orientation – 315 (1%) involved transgender (Source: Home Office “Hate Crimes, England and Wales 2011/12”) Terms of reference MOJ asked the Law Commission to look into: “(a) extending the aggravated offences in the Crime and Disorder Act 1998 to include where hostility is demonstrated towards people on the grounds of disability, sexual orientation or [trans] gender identity; (b) the case for extending the stirring up of hatred
    [Show full text]