DOCSLIB.ORG

Gb1472 Ecr 31

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

726. 16 August 1745. Certified copy of an account of the pills, gouts, sea walls, reens etc. belonging to Eton College in the parishes of Nash and Goldcliff as appears by the Court of Sewers book dated 5 April 1720. Subscribed: 16 August 174-5 Extracted out of the Court of Sewers Book by me Hen. Morgan Deputy Clerk under William Williams, gent., Clerk to the Commissioners of Sewers. Endorsed: Goldcliff account of the Sea Walls etc. to be repaired by Eton College. 727. Newport, 9 March 20 George II, 1746 jjl^lj]'. Certified copy of an order of the Commissioners of Sewers for Caldicot Hundred, Monmouthshire, quashing thejpresentment of the jury made before the Court on 10 March 174-5 /Vfkjy/Sj, whereby 6 perches on broadstreet common were to be done by Eton College at 5s. a perch, and a gout was to be made by the College; and ordering that the cost of maintaining the hollow tree in the same stank was to be paid by the Provost and Fellows as brinkers on one side, and a moiety of the expense to be borne by the other brinker, Charles Griffiths, jun. 728. N.d. /Tate lykOs/. Copy of presentments of the jury to the Commissioners of Sewers, 11 March 1744- /T744/57 and 11 March 1745 /J745/67; questions on the presentments which the jury should be called upon to explain; statement of the case to be submitted to the Court of Sewers on behalf of Eton College concerning their liability to repair a certain stretch of sea wall. The College questions the identification of the wall and claims that neither in the Old Book nor in the New Book was it shown that Eton was chargeable for its upkeep beyond a small share. Endorsed: Sea walls 1749 in the manour of Goldcliff Paper, torn, needs repair. 729. N.d. /T17547. Certified copy of order by the Commissioners of Sewers for Caldicot Hundred, Monmouthshire, at the Court held at Newport, 14 October 28 George II, 1754: that the order made by the Court on 8 April 1754 appointing William Phillips and Samuel Evans, gent., expenditors on the two gouts on the end of Monkditch pill next to the sea which are defective and worth the doing £20, and which ought to be done by the Provost and Fellows of Eton College, be renewed. The expenditors are to employ workmen to do the repairs as soon as possible and upon production of their accounts shall have reimbursement. Subscribed: Examined by W. Williams, Clerk to the Commissioners. Payment due to the Clerk for this and the former order 5s. 144 730. ?1755. Goldcliff parish: an account of damages alleged to have been done to the Provost and Fellows of Eton College by Samuel Evans to the detriment of the sea walls etc. since the death of Westcot Littleton, vicar of Goldcliff, 12 December 1754. Subscribed: The several articles above exhibited against Mr Samuel Evans have been examined by me and I do certify that the same appear to be il l grounded frivolous and very much to the detriment of Mr Evans his Character given under my hand the 23d of July 1755* Charles Van. Van has annotated the entries either 'satisfied' or "no proof. Endorsed: Account of Damages 1754 at Goldcliff to be taken into Consideration No 8 In a different hand: ? P. Francis (the second of the names who made the presentment against Evans, but the hand is difficult to read) 145 ECCLESIASTICAL 731' Mandate of Thomas /Cranmer/, Archbishop of Canterbury, to all rectors, vicars etc. in the Province of Canterbury, Manor of Lambeth, 11 February 1534 in the 2nd year of his episcopacy. Recites that a writ gravi cum querela was shown to him on the part of the Provost and Fellows of Eton College, rectors or proprietors of the parish church of Nash in the diocese of Llandaff, that when master Griffin Leyson, doctor of laws, commissary appointed to visit the city and diocese of Llandaff, visited the parish church of Chepstow in the deanery of Netherwent in the diocese of Llandaff on 15 September last past, he sequestered the ecclesiastical fruits, issues and emoluments of the parish church of Nash because the chancel was in disrepair, and for other reasons sufficiently proved before him on the part of the parishioners, and granted custody of the things sequestered to Robert Smyth and William Sampson, parishioners of the said parish. But because the Provost and Fellows, rectors and proprietors of the said church, offered a sufficient and fi t pledge for repairing the chancel before a day to be fixed by the commissary, and to do other things which the Provost and Fellows, by reason of the appropriation of the said church, and by right and custom, were bound to do, he reversed the sequestration. The Archbishop ordered that the keepers of the things sequestered should no longer detain the fruits and emoluments of the said church after intimation of the reversal of the sequestration, but should permit the Provost and Fellows or their deputies to enjoy their ecclesiastical rights there. But Robert Smyth and William Sampson notwithstanding retained to themselves the levying, collection and receipt of the fruits and emoluments of the church, in contempt of the order. The Archbishop therefore orders the recipients to inhibit Robert Smyth and William Sampson, or anyone else, from detaining the fruits and emoluments of the church, and to permit the Provost and Fellows to enjoy their ecclesiastical rights freely and peaceably themselves or through ministers, upon pain of excommunication. Part of seal only remains. Endorsed: Preceptum vestrum excecutum est per me Edmund' ap Thomas vicarium ecclesie infra scrypt'. 732. 7 December I756. Petition of the Provost and Fellows of Eton College to the Lords Commissioners of the Great Seal: The Provost and Fellows ask that their error in presenting the Revd. Thomas Skinner in August 1756 to the discharged vicarage of Christchurch, Monmouthshire, be overlooked, and that his presentation be confirmed. The vicarage was void, as it was thought, by the cession of the Revd. Mr John Pettingall, who had held it for 4 years with another small living by acquiescence of the College at the request of the Bishop of Lincoln. It has since been discovered that, though discharged, Christchurch is rated at over £10 in the King's books, and therefore the right of presentation belongs to the Lords Commissioners of the Great Seal. 146 MISCELLANEOUS 733. 12 October 17^7- Petition of the free and customary tenants of the manor of Goldcliff to the Provost and Fellows of Eton College, in favour of taking down Goldcliff mill. Endorsed by Betham: 17^7 Goldcliff Petition of the Tenants to take away the Mill. 73^A i 2. N.d. Two copies of a printed notice about the woods which Thomas Bold issued on behalf of the College, threatening legal action against anyone who cuts down or enters the woods on the College estate. ECR 64/734/1 endorsed: Notice about Woods which T. Bold has thought right to distribute at different times. 735- May 1815. Plan for a sea wall, Goldcliff. Scale: 4 ft. to 1 inch. 14-7 APPENDIX I 1. Sciant presentes et futuri quod ego Hoel* de Carliun pro dei amore et sancte Marie Magdalene et pro salute anime mee et antecessorum meorum et heredum meorum concedo et hac carta mea confirmo omnes donationes ecclesiarum terrarum et elemosinarum quas ego feci et antecessores mei et homines mei fecerunt deo et sancte Marie Magdalene et monachis deo et sancte Marie Magd* servientibus, s/cilicet/ ex dono meo ecclesiam de Wndi et molendinum et i acram terre et i i burgagias aput Carliun; Ex dono Morgani molendinum iuxta langestan; ex dono Morg' iunioris x solid' terre aput fraxinum; ex dono Morg' et I duas piscarias in usca, una que dicitur fifwere et aliam ex transverso, et cc acras in mora; de Wronu fil ' Nich' v solid' terre in mora de excambio; ex dono Willelmi camerarii v solid' terre aput fraxinum; ex dono Caradoci terra de bule mora; ex dono W/jronu/ fil ' Nic' et Cadug' fratris eius unam piscariam aput colemannes pulle. Quare volo ut predict! monachi habeant et teneant bene et in pace libere et quiete inperpetuam elemosinam omnes predictas possessiones et quicquid eis ab heredibus meis et hominibus meis amplius pro dei amore datum fuit. T/estibus/ Ric* capell', Philipp' Cleric', Rob' cle' de Novob', Gocel' fil ' Euer', R. Was. 3. Notum sit omnibus presentibus et futuris quod ego Henricus prior de Goldcl' et eiusdem loci conventus concessimus et hac present' carta nostra confirmavimus Willelmo Blewett domino de langstane et hered' suis ut habeant unam guttam ex transverso de dubeleis currentem per medium terre nostre usque ad magnam guttam nostram que cadat in pullard ad essewiandum pratum suum quod iacet inter terram andree Capellani de K/Tar/liun et pasturam de lanwarne ex una parte et pratum domini Nichol' de Mora et fossatum nostrum iuxta dubeleis ex altera Habend' et tenend' dietarn guttam cum curso suo imperpetuum de nobis et successoribus nostris sibi et hered' suis reddend' inde annuatim nobis et successoribus nostris ipse et hered' sui imperpetuum ad pasca decem solid' sterling' Itaque quod nos habeamus exclusam unam in predicto fossat' nostro currentem quociencumque opus fuerit Et si forte Inundacio aque supervenit in dicto prato per quam teneamus dampnum nobis accidere in terris nostris obstruatur gutta ili a donee Inundacio quociencumque venerit retracta fuerit Cum autem dicta Inundacio retract' fuerit aperiatur iterum dicta gutta Predict' vero Willelmus et hered' tenentur facere et sustinere unam waldam ex parte orientali predict' prati sui a walda predict' andree Capellani usque ad alnetum de lanwaam et aliam waldam usque North a prato predict' Nicholai usque ad valdam nostram iuxta dubeleis
Recommended publications
  • The Pheasant Fur and Feather Series

    The Pheasant Fur and Feather Series

    Plieasa|rt^ l':ifci^hr'L;!;i::i;;i:':!;;!:;;Hi;.:; New York State College of Agriculture At Cornell University Ithaca, N. Y. Library The original of tliis book is in tine Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924000058523 Fur and Feather Series edited by ALFRED E. T. WATSON NEW YORK STATE COLLEGE OF ^.GrjOULTURE AT CORNELL UITKEECITY Department of Poultry Husbandry ITHACA, N. Y. THE PHEASANT FUR AND FEATHER SERIES. Edited by ALFRED E. T. WATSON. THE PARTRIDGE. NATURAL HlHTORV-'By the Rev. H. A. Macpherson. SHOOTING—By A. J. Stuart- WoRTLEY. COOKERY—By G-e.OKGE Saintsbury. With Illustrations by A. Thorburn, A. J. Stuart-Wortley, and C. Whymper. Crown 8vo. 5J. [Ready. THE GROUSE. NATURAL HISTORV— By ihe Rev. H. A. Macpherson. SHOOTING — By A. J. Stuakt- WoRTLEY. COOKERY—By George Saintsbury. Witli Illustrations by A. J. Stijart-Wortley and A. Thorburn. Crown 8vo, 5^. [Ready. THE PHEASANT. natural HISTORY-By the Rev. H. A. Macpherson. SHOOT/NC—By A. J. Stuart- WoRTLEv. COOKERY—By Alexander Innes Shand. With Illustrations by A. Thorburn and A. J. Stuart- WoRTLEV. Crown 8vo. 5J. {Ready. THE HARE AND THE RABBIT. By the Hon. Gerald Lascelles, &c. [/« preparation. WILDFOWL. By the Hon. John Scott-Montagu, M.P. &c. [In preparation. LONGMANS, GREEN, & CO. London and New York. ^4:£^^(A•^jOL-r V^t^ * rronxtspiece GOOn BEAT SPOILED BY FOZ THE PHEASANT NATURAL H[STORY BY THE REV. H. A. MACPHERSON SHOOTING BY A. J.
  • London Organising Committee of The

    London Organising Committee of The

    @9 rGhqphrhqWvhy6rvSr ! " 8r 6ii rvhvv Byh vv D qp v ! SryrhQyhvtQyvphqBvqhpr& "Ghqphr 7hryvr " #Wvhy 7hryvr! $Qrvhy 8vqr hv!$ %Hvvth v"" &8py v"& ! " 6ii rvhv #! $ # ! %$ % #! # ! #&! # $ & ! # # ! $! & & "' " '() * * % % Byh " ( $ ) +# $ $ ) , ( + # * $+ " - $ $ + . . . + * $ $ ,/ , # . . # % R!$ 2.#%!3"( + * &$+! # 4 $ ,4 ( &$ + ! " # * $ ( +! # . + ! $! + 2 , 3 * ( $ ) $! $ , 2!3 + , . ' ,# . , ,# ,# & ) + () ) )4 " '() $ . $ + , . # . , ,# ,# & ) + ( ( $( )2 5 3, " $* 6 " + " $ ( "( % $ $ "( $ + " ($ "$ $5 + " ($ % +# * $+ " , $ $ * * $ $ + A ( * ! $( ) $ + ! " D qpv 7hpxt q ++ * $ 2 3 $! 2!3+ * $ ,( ( "( % $ "( $ + ++ *$ ( $ ( ! , % 7 ) 2%7 3 " 7 6 & 2"76&3+* ( 7 ) 27 3+. ,$ ),6 " " $* + +8+ * $ ( ( 9 * " $ %7 : * " $ "76&: * ; 6 " "76&: "( )$
  • Notice of Motion from Dr O'kelly Cycling

    Notice of Motion from Dr O'kelly Cycling

    County Council 20 July 2018 Agenda Item 6(b) - Notice of Motion from Dr O’Kelly Cycling - Briefing Note Policy Background The Government’s Cycling and Walking Investment Strategy, published in 2017, includes the ambition to double levels of cycling by 2025. The West Sussex Walking and Cycling Strategy 2016-26 was adopted in October 2016 in support of the Government’s ambition. The Strategy was developed to create a pipeline of future schemes for delivery, to direct future investment in to walking and cycling (e.g. through local development) and to support bids for external funding. The Strategy contains a list of over 300 potential new walking and cycling routes suggested by a range of stakeholders which were ranked and prioritised for feasibility work. Partnership Working Cycling development will only be achieved through strong partnership working. The inaugural West Sussex Cycle Summit was held in September 2016 to officially launch the West Sussex Walking and Cycling Strategy 2016-26. The event was organised by the West Sussex Cycle Forum and held in partnership with West Sussex County Council. A second summit was held in October 2017. A consortium of West Sussex authorities has been successful in bidding for Department for Transport consultancy advice to develop Local Cycling and Walking Infrastructure Plans (LCWIPs). LCWIPs are high-level strategies focusing on town- sized areas that highlight the routes where investment in new infrastructure provision is most likely to help to achieve our target. In September the consortium will begin working with consultants appointed by the Department for Transport on developing LCWIPs for Chichester, Crawley, Horsham and Worthing.
  • Exhibition Academy

    Exhibition Academy

    EXHIBITION Ac ade my MDCCCCX Forty - second The Exhibition o ens the firs t M onda in Ma and cl ose h p y y, s t e first Monda in Au us t y g . Hour s o A mi ss i on from 8 A M ill P M xce t on the fir . t . e s f d 7 . ( p t da wh en the doors do not o n f r I O Ho y, pe be o e ur ofclo in 0 P M s g, 7 . 3 . ’ P r i ce o A omiss i oi z I s f , . P i c o Cata lo ue L ar i mall r e : e w th a er cover I s . S wi h f g g , p p , , t a er cover 1s . Small bound i n cloth with encil 1s 6d p p , , , p , . S as on Ti cket s e , 5 . isitors are n ot re uired to ive u their S ti cks Umbr ellas or V q g p , P ar as ols b efore enteri ng the Gall eri es but they c an leave them if the wish with th e attendant s at th e loak oom y , C R in the E tranc ll The oth r att ndants are stric l n e Ha . e e t y forbidden take h r ofan thin to c a ge y g . Tli e Refr eslzmefz t Room i s r eached by a s taircase leading out ofthe Water Colour oom R .
  • Gb 1472 Ecr60

    Gb 1472 Ecr60

    Introduction The records listed in this volume are what might be described as central records of the College – the minute books, the registers, the statutes and similar material, generated directly by the Provost and Fellows and the New Governing Body. There are, however, equally central records listed elsewhere. The Foundation and Consolidation Charters, and other royal charters, were listed by Noel Blakiston as ECR 39. He included other central records, particularly relating to the building of the College, in ECR 38 and ECR 49. Accounting records to 1642, including the audit rolls up to 1505, when they were replaced by books, are listed as ECR 61 and later accounting records as ECR 62. Papers produced by individual Provosts, Vice-Provosts and Fellows (though there are very few of this last category) will be found as COLL/P, COLL/VP or COLL/FELL as appropriate. The papers of officers such as the Bursar (COLL/B), Registrar(COLL/REG) and other College servants are also separately listed. The catalogue of the College’s archives (now COLL/ARCH/1) compiled in 1724 by Thomas Martin (1697 – 1771) mentions the central records that existed at the time but does not list them individually. Binding, indexing and annotation of the registers in particular show clearly that their importance and value were recognised. Seal books, minute books and lease books were also carefully preserved. However, unbound papers were less well served by a storage system that was essentially organised by estate and were allowed to accumulate in considerable confusion until very roughly sorted by Noel Blakiston into boxes covering ten year periods.
  • An Archaeological Desk-Based Assessment of Land at Lion House, Slough, Berkshire

    An Archaeological Desk-Based Assessment of Land at Lion House, Slough, Berkshire

    An Archaeological Desk-Based Assessment of Land at Lion House, Slough, Berkshire NGR TQ 598 699 Parish of Slough Slough Borough Prepared for O.C. Ventures Ltd Caroline Russell BA, PhD Project No. 2919 June 2007 Archaeology South-East, 1, West Street, Ditchling, Hassocks, W. Sussex. BN6 8TS Tel: 01273 845497 Fax: 01273 844187 [email protected] Archaeology South-East Lion House, Slough _____________________________________________________________________ Summary A Desk Based Assessment has been prepared for a plot of land at Lion House, Petersfield Avenue, Slough. A review of existing archaeological and historical sources suggested that the Site has a low potential for containing deposits of Prehistoric to Medieval date, and a high potential for containing deposits relating to a terrace of late 19th century buildings. Farming and various phases of construction in the 19th onwards is likely to have truncated to an unknown extent any archaeological deposits across much of the site. _____________________________________________________________________ i Archaeology South-East Lion House, Slough _____________________________________________________________________ CONTENTS 1. Introduction 2. Site Topography and Geology 3. Planning Background 4. Archaeological and Historical Background 5. Cartographic Evidence 6. Aerial Photographs 7. Walkover Survey 8. Assessment of Archaeological Potential 9. Existing Impacts on Archaeological Potential 10. Assessment of Future Impacts 11. Recommendations 12. Acknowledgments References Appendix 1: Summary Table of Archaeological Sites _____________________________________________________________________ ii Archaeology South-East Lion House, Slough _____________________________________________________________________ LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS Fig. 1 Site Location Plan showing SMR Data Fig. 2 Site Location Plan (in greater detail) Fig. 3 3D Model of Proposed Development Fig. 4 Thomas Jefferys, Map of Buckinghamshire, 1770 Fig. 5 Richard Binfield, Inclosure Map, 1822 Fig.
  • Clay Lane, Warningcamp, West Sussex

    Clay Lane, Warningcamp, West Sussex

    Clay Lane, Warningcamp, West Sussex Chichester Clay Lane, Warningcamp, Arundel, West Sussex, BN18 9QN This fine early Victorian farmhouse has been refurbished throughout and is located in the heart of the Saxon village of Warningcamp, about one mile east of the Historic town of Arundel. sitting room | dining room | 4 double bedrooms (1 en suite) | bathroom | pantry | utility room | double garage | large mature garden Arun District Council Council Tax Band G - £2,456.03 Rent - £2,500 pcm Description Clay Lane Farmhouse has been redecorated from top to bottom to provide a spacious family home. The accommodation comprises a large sitting room with an open fireplace, a dining room, a good sized kitchen with an adjacent shelved pantry. There is also a utility room and a cloakroom on the ground floor. On the first floor are four double bedrooms (one with an ensuite shower room), and a family bathroom. Situation Arundel is a picturesque, historic town with a cathedral, castle, many attractive period buildings and a variety of cafes and restaurants. Cultural and leisure opportunities include the thriving annual arts festival, and a good selection of antique shops and markets. There are tennis courts and a bowling green within the town whilst horse racing can be found at Goodwood and Fontwell. Golf is available at Ham Manor and Goodwood, and sailing from Littlehampton Marina and Chichester Harbour. Drama and music are catered for at Arundel's Priory Playhouse and Chichester's famous Festival Theatre. A mainline station at Arundel provides services to both London (Victoria) and Gatwick. Fees Apply W N S E W N S E F/P Living Room F/P 3.5m x 3.4m Dining Room Kitchen 11'7" x 11'3" 3.3m x 2.7m 2.2m x 2.0m Once tenancy terms have beenF/P agreed, a non-refundable7'4" x 6'6" Living10'10" Room x 8'11" (Maximum) F/P administration fee is 3.5mpayable.
  • Climping and River Arun West Bank Consultation Summary Report

    Climping and River Arun West Bank Consultation Summary Report

    Climping and River Arun West Bank Consultation Summary Report Part the of the Arun to Pagham flood and coastal erosion risk management strategy March 2015 Consultation Summary Document i We are The Environment Agency. It's our job to look after your environment and make it a better place – for you, and for future generations. Your environment is the air you breathe, the water you drink and the ground you walk on. Working with business, Government and society as a whole, we are making your environment cleaner and healthier. The Environment Agency. Out there, making your environment a better place. Published by: Environment Agency Horizon house, Deanery Road Bristol BS1 5AH Tel: 0117 934 4000 Email: enquiries@environment- agency.gov.uk www.environment-agency.gov.uk Further copies of this report are available © Environment Agency from our publications catalogue: http://publications.environment- All rights reserved. This document may be agency.gov.uk or our National Customer reproduced with prior permission of Contact Centre: T: 08708 506506 the Environment Agency. E: [email protected]. Consultation Summary Document ii Contents Introduction 4 1.1 Background 4 2. Consultation 5 2.1 Formal consultation 5 3 Responses to the consultation 6 3.1 Project team responses to comments 10 4 Conclusions and next steps 13 Consultation Summary Document iii Introduction 1.1 Background From 1 June 2009 to 31 December 2009, we consulted on the draft strategy with local residents and other people and organisations with an interest in the area. We met many local people to explain our draft recommendations and answer their questions.
  • Farnhams Magazine March 2017

    Farnhams Magazine March 2017

    farnhamsmagazine sharing life in our community March 2017 farnhamsmagazine 3 Index Activities – SP Bellringers, Ballroom Dancing 68 Advertiser’s Index 77 Archives, County - The Abandoned Baby 48,49 Archives, Parish – Farnham House 51 Burnham Beeches Bulletin 14,15 Church Church Information 78 Easter Services 80 Rector’s Letter 7 Parish Registers 70 Concerts and Events 66 Crossword Solution 73 Editorial 5 Farnham Common Nurseries 30,31 Farnhams Magazine Party 17 Farnhams Magazine Publication Details 4 Farnham Royal Parish Fete 38 Hedgerley Historical Society 45, 46 Horticultural Show 38 Irish Dancing 18 JAWS 24,25 Jottings from the Potting Shed 36,37 Library 60 Library Book Review 61 Mothers’ Union 52 Obituaries 56 Old Telephone Exchange, Farnham Common 73 Open Gardens 40 Parish Patch 8,11,12 Parliamentary Information 74 Rotary Club, Burnham Beeches 42,43 Rotary Club, Slough, Walk 59 Royal British Legion 53 SBDC, Chiltern CC & Thames Valley Police Loan Sharks 63 Beating the Burglars 64 School – Farnham Common School 21 School – Farnham Royal Village School 20 Scouts 22,23 Southmead Surgery 59 Sports reports 27 St Mary’s Farnham Royal – ‘Drop-in Centre’ 55 Stoke Poges Memorial Gardens 33,34 Thursday Walkers – Trip to Lisbon 28,29 Women’s Institute Hedgerley 52 Cover: Stoke Poges Memorial Gardens Photo © Jessica Houdret 4 farnhamsmagazine sharing life in our community THE FARNHAMS MAGAZINE is published by Farnham Royal Parochial Church Council. It is produced quarterly in March, June, September and December and contains village, church and council news. If you have any comments or contributions, as an individual, an organisation or a business, the Editors will be delighted to hear from you.
  • Annex E2 Visit Reports.Pdf

    Annex E2 Visit Reports.Pdf

    Annex E2 Final Report Working Group 1 – Engineers WG1: Report on visit to the Ledbury Estate, Peckham, Southwark November 30th 2018. The Ledbury Estate is in Peckham and includes four 14-storey Large Panel System (LPS) tower blocks. The estate belongs to Southwark Council. The buildings were built for the GLC between 1968 and 1970. The dates of construction as listed as Bromyard (1968), Sarnsfield (1969), Skenfrith (1969) and Peterchurch House (1970). The WG1 group visited Peterchurch House on November 30th 2018. The WG1 group was met by Tony Hunter, Head of Engineering, and, Stuart Davis, Director of Asset Management and Mike Tyrrell, Director of the Ledbury Estate. The Ledbury website https://www.southwark.gov.uk/housing/safety-in-the-home/fire-safety-on-the- ledbury-estate?chapter=2 includes the latest Fire Risk Assessments, the Arup Structural Reports and various Residents Voice documents. This allowed us a good understanding of the site situation before the visit. In addition, Tony Hunter sent us copies of various standard regulatory reports. Southwark use Rowanwood Apex Asset Management System to manage their regulatory and ppm work. Following the Structural Surveys carried out by Arup in November 2017 which advised that the tower construction was not adequate to withstand a gas explosion, all piped gas was removed from the Ledbury Estate and a distributed heat system installed with Heat Interface Units (HIU) in each flat. Currently fed by an external boiler system. A tour of Peterchurch House was made including a visit to an empty flat where the Arup investigation points could be seen.
  • South Bucks Councillor Update Economic Profile of Farnham Royal Ward

    South Bucks Councillor Update Economic Profile of Farnham Royal Ward

    South Bucks Councillor Update Economic Profile of Farnham Royal Ward April 2014 Produced by Buckinghamshire Business First’s research department P a g e | 2 1.0 Introduction Farnham Royal is home to 5,499 people and provides 2,300 jobs in 62 businesses. Of these businesses, 25 (40.3 per cent) are Buckinghamshire Business First members. There were 3,814 employed people aged 16-74 living in Farnham Royal ward at the 2011 Census, 340 more than the 3,474 recorded in 2001. Over that period the working age population rose 297 to 3,272 while the total population rose 516 to 5,499. The number of households rose by 194 (10.0 per cent) to 2,126. This is a significant percentage increase and places the ward fourth out of all wards in South Bucks. Based on the increase in number of households, the ward ranks 18th out of all wards in Buckinghamshire. The largest companies in Farnham Royal include: Wyevale Garden Centres Ltd; Caldicott Preparatory School; A Perfect Valet; Farnham Common Infant School; Bishop Sports & Leisure Ltd; E P Rothwell & Sons Ltd; and Dair House School Trust Ltd. There are 38 Farnham Royal, representing 1.2 per cent of working age residents, including 25 claimants aged 25-49 and 25 who have been claiming for less than six months. Superfast broadband is expected to be available to 97 per cent of premises in the Farnham Royal ward by March 2016 with commercial providers responsible for the full 97 per cent. The Connected Counties project, run by BBF, will deliver no superfast broadband following this sufficient coverage from commercial suppliers.
  • Getting to Know Your River

    Getting to Know Your River

    Would you like to find out more about us, or about your environment? Then call us on 08708 506 506 (Mon-Fri 8-6) A user’s guide to the email River Thames enquiries@environment- agency.gov.uk or visit our website www.environment-agency.gov.uk incident hotline getting to know 0800 80 70 60 (24hrs) floodline 0845 988 1188 your river Environment first: This publication is printed on paper made from 100 per cent previously used waste. By-products from making the pulp and paper are used for composting and fertiliser, for making cement and for generating energy. GETH0309BPGK-E-P Welcome to the River Thames safe for the millions of people who use it, from anglers and naturalists to boaters, We are the Environment Agency, navigation authority for the River Thames walkers and cyclists. This leaflet is an essential guide to helping the wide variety from Lechlade to Teddington. We care for the river, keeping it clean, healthy and of users enjoy their activities in harmony. To help us maintain this harmony, please To encourage better understanding amongst river users, there are nine River User Groups (RUGs) read about activities other than your own covering the length of the river from Cricklade to to help you appreciate the needs of others. Tower Bridge. Members represent various river users, from clubs and sporting associations to commercial businesses. If you belong to a club that uses the river, encourage it to join the appropriate group. Contact your local waterway office for details. Find out more about the River Thames at www.visitthames.co.uk Before you go..