DOCSLIB.ORG

Combined Transcripts: Exoplanets Course

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Combined Transcripts: Exoplanets Course Combined Transcripts: Exoplanets Course V0.0_Intro [BRIAN] Hello and welcome to the ANU edX course on exoplanets. My name is Brian Schmidt, and I'm an astronomer here at the Australian National University. I'm normally thought of someone who studies cosmology, the universe on its largest scales, but I also work in the field of exoplanets through a program known as the HAT South telescope network, where we're out searching for planets going around nearby stars. [PAUL] And I'm Paul Francis, I'm the other lecturer in this course. My interest in exoplanets comes from the study of comets, which occur both in our solar system and in other solar systems. but I also do work on giant black holes and the origin of the universe. [ BRIAN] So exoplanets and the study of the exoplanets is arguably one of the most exciting topics in astronomy today, it has come from nowhere to being a science that is literally lighting up humanity and discovery. [PAUL] 15 years ago we did not know about any planets around stars other than our own. Now there are over a thousand, and not a week goes by without some new and wierd discovery being in the papers about some strange planet or something else going on out there. [BRIAN] and in this course we're going to try to bring you up to date with everything that's happening but it's going to be a challenge because things are changing so quickly. [PAUL] This is the second of four courses that together make up the Australian National University's first year astronomy unit. The first course, introduction, is on the greatest unsolved mysteries of the universe, you can do that course online through edX as well. If you haven't done that course, don't worry, we will repeat the important bits of it here. [BRIAN] Now this course is at a level which is a little bit more than your average documentary. We really need you to have some understanding of math and science and physics at the high-school level. If you are unsure, have a look at the first homework set for, problem set for this course and you'll get a sense because that's the level that's throughout the course. [PAUL] If you can do that, you'll be fine to do the whole course, it doesn't get any harder. Let me show you how the course works. Most of the course material can be found here in the coursework tab. each week a new section will be released in each section the two crucial parts are the lesson and the homework you should do the lesson first this is our equivalent of a lecture and it consists of a whole bunch of videos interspersed with questions Down here at the bottom of the video are the controls. They will differ depending on your browser. But you can go full screen, change the speed you play things at, turn the captions on and off and generally play around with them. also each week you will need to do the homework if you want to get a certificate for this course and this will consist of a bunch of numerical or formula type questions and maybe the occasional multiple choice question. In addition there are a number of things to help you. There are reference notes. This gives you the key facts from the videos so that when you're coming back to look up something you don't have to go to go through all the videos again There are links to papers, papers referred to in the talks, there are practice questions which will give you practice at solving the same sort of questions you are going to need for the homework. The practice questions are not worth marks, they are just for practice, and in some cases there will also be web-cast worked examples. And there is a mystery. Week by week this will build up. And then at the end of the course, in the exam wee will test you on it. also crucial is the discussion here you can pose questions to us and answer questions and generally interact with the other members of the class [BRIAN] So I think that's all you need to know to start this course. [PAUL] If there's anything still unclear to you, check the reference notes out in this section, or put a post on the bulletin board, the discussion board, and we will let you, answer your question. [BRIAN] So let's start with, looking at one place where we really expected not to find a planet. V1.1 Welcome to our first lesson on 'exoplanets', one of the most exciting and active areas of astronomy today. What is an 'exoplanet'? An exoplanet is a planet that orbits a different star, not our own sun. We know about the planets orbiting around our sun like Jupiter, Saturn, Earth and so on. What about planets orbiting others stars? There are billions upon trillions upon trillions of other stars out there. Do they have planets orbiting them? Are they like like our own? These are the sort of questions we are going to address through this course. Now, why is this hard? Well, the basic problem is that our own solar system seems pretty big to us, when the furthest a human being has ever been is to the moon and not any of the planets, but in the scheme of the galaxy, our own solar system is very small and exoplanets are very far away. Let's try an analogy of that. To get a sense of how big the solar system is and how much empty space there is in it, let's have a scale model. As our scale, imagine the Earth is the size of this ball. To that scale the moon would be the size of a tennis ball, about 10 metres away. Jupiter would be the size of a car on that hill. Pluto would be about twice as far away as this mountain. That's the solar system. To get to the nearest other solar system, Alpha Centauri, you have to go 25 times around the world. So, on this scale, the fastest spacecraft that the human race have ever come up with are travelling at about the speed of a garden snail. So, it's going to take a long time to get anywhere. 25 times around the world. So, we're not going, in any foreseeable future, to be actually sending space probes, to let alone visiting, to any other solar system. So, if we can't go there, what can we do? I suppose we could try looking. We'll point our telescopes there, to light coming from us at the speed of light, and actually see what's going on. So, we can take the biggest telescopes in the world and point them at a nearby star and just look for them, right? Well, it sounds simple and if you do the calculation, it turns out that, in principle, you can actually see a planet that's actually bright enough that it can be picked up with even a medium- sized telescope, let alone one of the biggest in the world. The problem is not that the planets are too faint, the problem is that they're very near the star that they're orbiting, as viewed from here, and that star they're orbiting is much, much, much brighter. So, let's say, if you consider, you're in a dark alleyway at night, and someone is standing there with a candle about 10 to 20 metres away. Would you be able to see that? Probably, yes. But let's say that person is sitting in front of a car and they suddenly turn the full-beam headlights on. Can you now see it? Well, let's find out. What have you done to her? The difference in brightness between a candle and full-beam headlights is about a factor of a thousand if you do the figures. The difference in brightness between a planet and a star is about a billion, so it's actually a lot like someone is standing with a candle with an atom bomb going off behind them. That's actually about the right ratio. That sounds hopeless. So, we're kind of stuck. We can't go there and we can't see them. So, there's some other ideas that we can maybe get out of how to find these things. One idea is the idea of 'Reflex Motion', because as a planet orbits a sun, the sun, of course, orbits the centre of mass. Both objects orbit the centre of mass and so the star doesn't make a big motion, but it does make a motion that is potentially measurable. Well, this simulation is grossly exaggerated, the wobble of a star is nothing like this big, but the basic idea is that this star is leaning back a little bit against the gravity of the planet and so we'll be doing a very small circle. So, in principle, if you see a star doing loopty-loops, even though you can't see the planet, you might be able to deduce that it's there. Yes, sounds like a good idea. So, that's one technique. The next idea is the transit. The idea is that if you're lucky, the planet might actually go in front of a disc of a star as seen from here, in which case, once every orbit, you will, well you won't actually be able to see the actual disc of a star, even the nearer stars are just a dot or are far smaller than a pixel, but what might happen is that as it goes in front, the brightness would decrease very slightly, it might be blocking a mere one percent or ten percent of a stars surface.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Echo Exoplanet Characterisation Observatory
    Exp Astron (2012) 34:311–353 DOI 10.1007/s10686-012-9303-4 ORIGINAL ARTICLE EChO Exoplanet characterisation observatory G. Tinetti · J. P. Beaulieu · T. Henning · M. Meyer · G. Micela · I. Ribas · D. Stam · M. Swain · O. Krause · M. Ollivier · E. Pace · B. Swinyard · A. Aylward · R. van Boekel · A. Coradini · T. Encrenaz · I. Snellen · M. R. Zapatero-Osorio · J. Bouwman · J. Y-K. Cho · V. Coudé du Foresto · T. Guillot · M. Lopez-Morales · I. Mueller-Wodarg · E. Palle · F. Selsis · A. Sozzetti · P. A. R. Ade · N. Achilleos · A. Adriani · C. B. Agnor · C. Afonso · C. Allende Prieto · G. Bakos · R. J. Barber · M. Barlow · V. Batista · P. Bernath · B. Bézard · P. Bordé · L. R. Brown · A. Cassan · C. Cavarroc · A. Ciaravella · C. Cockell · A. Coustenis · C. Danielski · L. Decin · R. De Kok · O. Demangeon · P. Deroo · P. Doel · P. Drossart · L. N. Fletcher · M. Focardi · F. Forget · S. Fossey · P. Fouqué · J. Frith · M. Galand · P. Gaulme · J. I. González Hernández · O. Grasset · D. Grassi · J. L. Grenfell · M. J. Griffin · C. A. Griffith · U. Grözinger · M. Guedel · P. Guio · O. Hainaut · R. Hargreaves · P. H. Hauschildt · K. Heng · D. Heyrovsky · R. Hueso · P. Irwin · L. Kaltenegger · P. Kervella · D. Kipping · T. T. Koskinen · G. Kovács · A. La Barbera · H. Lammer · E. Lellouch · G. Leto · M. A. Lopez Valverde · M. Lopez-Puertas · C. Lovis · A. Maggio · J. P. Maillard · J. Maldonado Prado · J. B. Marquette · F. J. Martin-Torres · P. Maxted · S. Miller · S. Molinari · D. Montes · A. Moro-Martin · J. I. Moses · O. Mousis · N. Nguyen Tuong · R.
    [Show full text]
  • In-System'' Fission-Events: an Insight Into Puzzles of Exoplanets and Stars?
    universe Review “In-System” Fission-Events: An Insight into Puzzles of Exoplanets and Stars? Elizabeth P. Tito 1,* and Vadim I. Pavlov 2,* 1 Scientific Advisory Group, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA 2 Faculté des Sciences et Technologies, Université de Lille, F-59000 Lille, France * Correspondence: [email protected] (E.P.T.); [email protected] (V.I.P.) Abstract: In expansion of our recent proposal that the solar system’s evolution occurred in two stages—during the first stage, the gaseous giants formed (via disk instability), and, during the second stage (caused by an encounter with a particular stellar-object leading to “in-system” fission- driven nucleogenesis), the terrestrial planets formed (via accretion)—we emphasize here that the mechanism of formation of such stellar-objects is generally universal and therefore encounters of such objects with stellar-systems may have occurred elsewhere across galaxies. If so, their aftereffects may perhaps be observed as puzzling features in the spectra of individual stars (such as idiosyncratic chemical enrichments) and/or in the structures of exoplanetary systems (such as unusually high planet densities or short orbital periods). This paper reviews and reinterprets astronomical data within the “fission-events framework”. Classification of stellar systems as “pristine” or “impacted” is offered. Keywords: exoplanets; stellar chemical compositions; nuclear fission; origin and evolution Citation: Tito, E.P.; Pavlov, V.I. “In-System” Fission-Events: An 1. Introduction Insight into Puzzles of Exoplanets As facilities and techniques for astronomical observations and analyses continue to and Stars?. Universe 2021, 7, 118. expand and gain in resolution power, their results provide increasingly detailed information https://doi.org/10.3390/universe about stellar systems, in particular, about the chemical compositions of stellar atmospheres 7050118 and structures of exoplanets.
    [Show full text]
  • Mineralogy of Super-Earth Planets
    This article was originally published in Treatise on Geophysics, Second Edition, published by Elsevier, and the attached copy is provided by Elsevier for the author's benefit and for the benefit of the author's institution, for non-commercial research and educational use including without limitation use in instruction at your institution, sending it to specific colleagues who you know, and providing a copy to your institution’s administrator. All other uses, reproduction and distribution, including without limitation commercial reprints, selling or licensing copies or access, or posting on open internet sites, your personal or institution’s website or repository, are prohibited. For exceptions, permission may be sought for such use through Elsevier's permissions site at: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/permissionusematerial Duffy T., Madhusudhan N. and Lee K.K.M Mineralogy of Super-Earth Planets. In: Gerald Schubert (editor-in-chief) Treatise on Geophysics, 2nd edition, Vol 2. Oxford: Elsevier; 2015. p. 149-178. Author's personal copy 2.07 Mineralogy of Super-Earth Planets T Duffy, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA N Madhusudhan, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK KKM Lee, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA ã 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. 2.07.1 Introduction 149 2.07.2 Overview of Super-Earths 150 2.07.2.1 What Is a Super-Earth? 150 2.07.2.2 Observations of Super-Earths 151 2.07.2.3 Interior Structure and Mass–Radius Relationships 151 2.07.2.4 Selected Super-Earths 154 2.07.2.5 Super-Earth Atmospheres 155 2.07.3 Theoretical
    [Show full text]
  • Terrestrial Planets
    Terrestrial Planets First ever ‘whole Earth’ picture from deep space, taken by Bill Anders on Apollo 8 Apollo 8 crew, Bill Anders centre: The Earth is just a planet courtesy Nasa 1- 4 from the Sun Image courtesy: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Terrestrial_planet_size_comparisons_edit.jpg Mercury, Venus, Earth and Mars are four astonishingly different planets Mercury and Venus have only been seen in any detail within the last 30 years Mercury in sight Courtesy NASA (Mariner 10) Mercury is visible only soon after the setting sun or shortly before dawn the Mariner 10 probe (1974/75) is the source of most information about Mercury – Messenger, launched 2004, first flypast in 2008 and orbit Mercury in 2011. ESA’s BepiColombo, to be launched in 2013 Mercury Mercury is like the Earth inside and the Moon outside Mercury has had a cooling and bombardment history similar to the moon It appears as cratered lava with scarps Its rocks are Earth-like Mariner 10 image Messenger images ↑ Double-ringed crater – a Mercury feature courtesy: http://messenger.jhuapl.edu/gallery/sciencePhotos/pics/S trom02.jpg ← Courtesy: http://messenger.jhuapl.edu/gal lery/sciencePhotos/pics/EN010 8828161M.jpg Messenger image Courtesy: http://messenger.jhuapl.edu/gallery/sciencePhotos/pics/Prockter06.jpg Mercury Close-up Mercury’s topography was formed under stronger gravity than on the Moon The Caloris basin is an impact crater ~1400 km across, beneath which is thought to be a dense mass 2 Mercury’s rotation period is exactly /3 of its orbital period
    [Show full text]
  • Using an Energy Balance Model to Determine Exoplanetary Climates
    Using an Energy Balance Model to Determine Exoplanetary Climates that Support Liquid Water By Macgregor Sullivan Presented to the Faculty of Wheaton College in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for Graduation with Departmental Honors in Physics May 14, 2018 1 Abstract The purpose of this thesis is to modify an energy balance atmospheric model created by R. Pierrehumbert (Pierrehumbert 2011). His energy balance model gave an estimate of Gliese 581g’s, a tidally locked exoplanet, atmosphere. Using an energy balance model, the surface and air temperatures can be found for a planet in equilibrium, when the amount incoming energy is equal to the amount of outgoing energy. Starting from Pierrehumbert’s model, we have added for a greenhouse effect and an ice-albedo feedback. We have also modified the model to test a rotating planet (similar to Earth) in addition to a tidally locked planet. This model, by varying the planet’s surface pressure, stellar flux, and the atmosphere's emissivity, can find which conditions leads to the planet having the temperatures needed to support liquid water. Surface pressure affects how efficient the planet is at redistributing heat leading to uniform temperatures across its surface. As the incoming stellar flux or the emissivity increase, the planet’s surface temperatures rise due the increase in absorbed energy from the planet’s surface. We have also found that the orbital distances that are able to support liquid water depend heavily on the pressure of the planet’s atmosphere. In future work, this model will produce the planet’s IR emission to determine if the planet is detectable using telescopes like the James Webb Space Telescope.
    [Show full text]
  • Recipe for a Habitable Planet
    Recipe for a Habitable Planet Aomawa Shields Clare Boothe Luce Associate Professor Shields Center for Exoplanet Climate and Interdisciplinary Education (SCECIE) University of California, Irvine ASU School of Earth and Space Exploration (SESE) December 2, 2020 A moment to pause… Leading effectively during COVID-19 • Employees Need Trust and Compassion: Be Present, Even When You're Distant • Employees Need Stability: Prioritize Wellbeing Amid Disruption • Employees Need Hope: Anchor to Your "True North" From “3 strategies for leading effectively during COVID-19” (https://www.gallup.com/workplace/306503/strategies-leading-effectively-amid-covid.aspx) Hobbies: reading movies, shows knitting mixed media/collage violin tea yoga good restaurants spa days the beach hiking smelling flowers hanging with family BINGO Ill. Niklas Elmehed. Ill. Niklas Elmehed. © Nobel Media. © Nobel Media. RadialVelocity (m/s) Nobel Prize in Physics 2019 Mayor & Queloz 1995 https://exoplanets.nasa.gov/ As of December 2, 2020 Aomawa Shields Recipe for a Habitable World Credit: NASA NNASA’sASA’s KKeplerepler MMissionission TESS Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite Credit: NASA-JPL/Caltech Proxima Centauri b Credit: ESO/M. Kornmesser LHS 1140b Credit: ESO TOI 700d Credit: NASA TESS planets in the Earth-sized regime Credit: NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center Which ones do we follow up on? 20 The Habitable Zone (Kasting et al. 1993, Kopparapu et al. 2013) ) Runaway greenhouse Maximum CO2 greenhouse Stellar Mass (M Mass Stellar Distance from Star (AU) Snowball Earth Many factors can affect planetary habitability Aomawa Shields Recipe for a Habitable World Liquid water Aomawa Shields Recipe for a Habitable World Isotopic Birth Tides Orbit Abundance Environ.
    [Show full text]
  • From Dust to Dust: Protoplanetary Disk Accretion, Hot Jupiter Climates, and the Evaporation of Rocky Planets
    UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title From Dust to Dust: Protoplanetary Disk Accretion, Hot Jupiter Climates, and the Evaporation of Rocky Planets Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9jq3136f Author Perez-Becker, Daniel Alonso Publication Date 2013 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California From Dust to Dust: Protoplanetary Disk Accretion, Hot Jupiter Climates, and the Evaporation of Rocky Planets By Daniel Alonso Perez-Becker A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Physics in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Eugene Chiang, Co-chair Professor Christopher McKee, Co-chair Professor Eliot Quataert Professor Geoffrey Marcy Fall 2013 From Dust to Dust: Protoplanetary Disk Accretion, Hot Jupiter Climates, and the Evaporation of Rocky Planets Copyright 2013 by Daniel Alonso Perez-Becker 1 Abstract From Dust to Dust: Protoplanetary Disk Accretion, Hot Jupiter Climates, and the Evaporation of Rocky Planets by Daniel Alonso Perez-Becker Doctor of Philosophy in Physics University of California, Berkeley Professor Eugene Chiang, Co-chair Professor Christopher McKee, Co-chair This dissertation is composed of three independent projects in astrophysics concerning phenomena that are concurrent with the birth, life, and death of planets. In Chapters 1 & 2, we study surface layer accretion in protoplanetary disks driven stellar X-ray and far-ultraviolet (FUV) radiation. In Chapter 3, we identify the dynamical mechanisms that control atmospheric heat redistribution on hot Jupiters. Finally, in Chapter 4, we characterize the death of low-mass, short-period rocky planets by their evaporation into a dusty wind.
    [Show full text]
  • Abstracts of Extreme Solar Systems 4 (Reykjavik, Iceland)
    Abstracts of Extreme Solar Systems 4 (Reykjavik, Iceland) American Astronomical Society August, 2019 100 — New Discoveries scope (JWST), as well as other large ground-based and space-based telescopes coming online in the next 100.01 — Review of TESS’s First Year Survey and two decades. Future Plans The status of the TESS mission as it completes its first year of survey operations in July 2019 will bere- George Ricker1 viewed. The opportunities enabled by TESS’s unique 1 Kavli Institute, MIT (Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States) lunar-resonant orbit for an extended mission lasting more than a decade will also be presented. Successfully launched in April 2018, NASA’s Tran- siting Exoplanet Survey Satellite (TESS) is well on its way to discovering thousands of exoplanets in orbit 100.02 — The Gemini Planet Imager Exoplanet Sur- around the brightest stars in the sky. During its ini- vey: Giant Planet and Brown Dwarf Demographics tial two-year survey mission, TESS will monitor more from 10-100 AU than 200,000 bright stars in the solar neighborhood at Eric Nielsen1; Robert De Rosa1; Bruce Macintosh1; a two minute cadence for drops in brightness caused Jason Wang2; Jean-Baptiste Ruffio1; Eugene Chiang3; by planetary transits. This first-ever spaceborne all- Mark Marley4; Didier Saumon5; Dmitry Savransky6; sky transit survey is identifying planets ranging in Daniel Fabrycky7; Quinn Konopacky8; Jennifer size from Earth-sized to gas giants, orbiting a wide Patience9; Vanessa Bailey10 variety of host stars, from cool M dwarfs to hot O/B 1 KIPAC, Stanford University (Stanford, California, United States) giants. 2 Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology TESS stars are typically 30–100 times brighter than (Pasadena, California, United States) those surveyed by the Kepler satellite; thus, TESS 3 Astronomy, California Institute of Technology (Pasadena, Califor- planets are proving far easier to characterize with nia, United States) follow-up observations than those from prior mis- 4 Astronomy, U.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1711.02098V2 [Astro-Ph.EP] 13 Jan 2018
    Draft version January 16, 2018 Typeset using LATEX twocolumn style in AASTeX61 SIMULATED JWST/NIRISS TRANSIT SPECTROSCOPY OF ANTICIPATED TESS PLANETS COMPARED TO SELECT DISCOVERIES FROM SPACE-BASED AND GROUND-BASED SURVEYS Dana R. Louie,1 Drake Deming,1, 2 Loic Albert,3 L. G. Bouma,4 Jacob Bean,5, 2 and Mercedes Lopez-Morales6, 2 1Department of Astronomy, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA 2TESS Atmospheric Characterization Working Group 3Institut de recherche sur les exoplanetes (iREx), Universite de Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada 4Department of Astrophysical Sciences, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08540, USA 5Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, University of Chicago, IL 60637, USA 6Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA Submitted to PASP ABSTRACT The Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite (TESS) will embark in 2018 on a 2-year wide-field survey mission, discov- ering over a thousand terrestrial, super-Earth and sub-Neptune-sized exoplanets (Rpl ≤ 4R⊕) potentially suitable for follow-up observations using the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST). This work aims to understand the suitability of anticipated TESS planet discoveries for atmospheric characterization by JWST's Near InfraRed Imager and Slitless Spectrograph (NIRISS) by employing a simulation tool to estimate the signal-to-noise (S/N) achievable in transmission spectroscopy. We applied this tool to Monte Carlo predictions of the TESS expected planet yield and then compared the S/N for anticipated TESS discoveries to our estimates of S/N for 18 known exoplanets. We analyzed the sensitivity of our results to planetary composition, cloud cover, and presence of an observational noise floor.
    [Show full text]
  • Part 1: the 1.7 and 3.9 Earth Radii Rule
    Hi this is Steve Nerlich from Cheap Astronomy www.cheapastro.com and this is What are exoplanets made of? Part 1: The 1.7 and 3.9 earth Radii rule. As of August 2016, the current count of confirmed exoplanets is up around 3,400 in 2,617 systems – with 590 of those systems confirmed to be multiplanet systems. And the latest thinking is that if you want to understand what exoplanets are made of you need to appreciate the physical limits of planet-hood, which are defined by the boundaries of 1.7 and 3.9 Earth radii . Consider that the make-up of an exoplanet is largely determined by the elemental make up of its protoplanetary disk. While most material in the Universe is hydrogen and helium – these are both tenuous gases. In order to generate enough gravity to hang on to them, you need a lot of mass to start with. So, if you’re Earth, or anything up to 1.7 times the radius of Earth – you’ve got no hope of hanging onto more than a few traces of elemental hydrogen and helium. Indeed, any exoplanet that’s less than 1.7 Earth radii has to be primarily composed of non-volatiles – that is, things that don’t evaporate or blow away easily – to have any chance of gravitationally holding together. A non-volatile exoplanet might be made of rock – which for our Solar System is a primarily silicon/oxygen based mineral matrix, but as we’ll hear, small sub-1.7 Earth radii exoplanets could be made of a whole range of other non-volatile materials.
    [Show full text]
  • Super-Dense Remnants of Gas Giant Exoplanets
    EPSC Abstracts Vol. 8, EPSC2013-986-1, 2013 European Planetary Science Congress 2013 EEuropeaPn PlanetarSy Science CCongress c Author(s) 2013 Super-dense remnants of gas giant exoplanets A. Mocquet (1), O. Grasset (1) and C. Sotin (2) (1) Laboratoire de Planétologie et Géodynamique UMR 6112, Nantes University, France ([email protected] / Fax:+33-2-51125268, (2) Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Caltech, Pasadena, California, USA Abstract of metallic materials is performed through the Mie- Grüneisen-Debye theory, which provides comparable The masses that have been observed for three large results to both ANEOS and Thomas-Fermi-Dirac exoplanets, Kepler-52b, Kepler-52c, and Kepler-57b, formulations up to a few tens of TPa [2]. The are between 30 and 100 times the Earth mass, which mechanical effects induced by the loss of the massive implies densities higher than iron planets of the same atmosphere are described by a pressure unloading of sizes. We propose that these planets could represent the solid core surface, and by a consequent increase the naked solid cores of gas giants that would have of volume and decrease of the density. Following the lost their atmospheres, for instance during their methods employed to investigate the deformation of migration towards their star, and investigate the the Earth’s mantle by surface loads [4], the evolution conditions under which the density of these cores of the unloading and associated decompression could remain close to their initial highly pressurized processes, is assessed by the convolution of a time- state. dependent source, the extensive surface stress, with the time varying viscoelastic response of the 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Composition and Fate of Short-Period Super-Earths: the Case of Corot-7B
    Astronomy & Astrophysics manuscript no. corot7b_Rv7pdf c ESO 2018 November 12, 2018 Composition and fate of short-period super-Earths The case of CoRoT-7b D. Valencia1, M. Ikoma1;2, T. Guillot1, and N. Nettelmann3 1 Observatoire de la C^oted'Azur, Universit´ede Nice-Sophia Antipolis, CNRS UMR 6202, BP 4229, F-06304 Nice Cedex 4, France 2 Dept. of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Ookayama, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 152-8551, Japan 3 Institut f¨urPhysik, Universit¨atRostock, D-18051 Rostock, Germany Preprint online version: November 12, 2018 ABSTRACT Context. The discovery of CoRoT-7b, a planet of radius 1:68 ± 0:09 R⊕, mass 4:8 ± 0:8; M⊕ and orbital period of 0:854 days demonstrates that small planets can orbit extremely close to their star. Aims. Several questions arise concerning this planet, in particular concerning its possible composition, and fate. Methods. We use knowledge of hot Jupiters, mass loss estimates and models for the interior structure and evolution of planets to understand its composition, structure and evolution. Results. The inferred mass and radius of CoRoT-7b are consistent with a rocky planet that would be significantly depleted in iron relative to the Earth. However, a one sigma increase in mass (5:6 M⊕) and one sigma decrease in size (1:59 R⊕) would make the planet compatible with an Earth-like composition (33% iron, 67% silicates). Alternatively, it is possible that CoRoT-7b contains a significant amount of volatiles. For a planet made of an Earth-like interior and an outer volatile-rich vapor envelope, an equally good fit to the measured mass and radius is found for a mass of the vapor envelope equal to 3% (and up to 10% at most) of the planetary mass.
    [Show full text]