House of Lords

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

House of Lords Session 2019-21 Monday No. 135 2 November 2020 PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) HOUSE OF LORDS WRITTEN STATEMENTS AND WRITTEN ANSWERS Written Statements ................................ ................ 1 Written Answers ................................ ..................... 4 [I] indicates that the member concerned has a relevant registered interest. The full register of interests can be found at http://www.parliament.uk/mps-lords-and-offices/standards-and-interests/register-of-lords-interests/ Members who want a printed copy of Written Answers and Written Statements should notify the Printed Paper Office. This printed edition is a reproduction of the original text of Answers and Statements, which can be found on the internet at http://www.parliament.uk/writtenanswers/. Ministers and others who make Statements or answer Questions are referred to only by name, not their ministerial or other title. The current list of ministerial and other responsibilities is as follows. Minister Responsibilities Baroness Evans of Bowes Park Leader of the House of Lords and Lord Privy Seal Earl Howe Deputy Leader of the House of Lords Lord Agnew of Oulton Minister of State, Cabinet Office and Treasury Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon Minister of State, Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office Lord Ashton of Hyde Chief Whip Baroness Barran Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Baroness Berridge Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department for Education and Department for International Trade Lord Bethell Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department of Health and Social Care and Whip Baroness Bloomfield of Hinton Whip Waldrist Lord Callanan Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy Earl of Courtown Deputy Chief Whip Lord Gardiner of Kimble Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Baroness Goldie Minister of State, Ministry of Defence Lord Goldsmith of Richmond Park Minister of State, Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs and Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office Lord Greenhalgh Minister of State, Home Office and Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government Lord Grimstone of Boscobel Minister of State, Department of Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy and Department for International Trade Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay Whip Baroness Penn Whip Baroness Scott of Bybrook Whip Baroness Stedman-Scott Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department for Work and Pensions Baroness Sugg Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office Lord True Minister of State, Cabinet Office Baroness Vere of Norbiton Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department for Transport Baroness Williams of Trafford Minister of State, Home Office Viscount Younger of Leckie Whip © Parliamentary Copyright House of Lords 2020 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/ Written Statements 2 November 2020 Page 1 I can inform the House that Her Majesty has appointed Written Statements Jonathan Rees QC to succeed Mr Cayley as the next independent Director of Service Prosecutions. Mr Rees Monday, 2 November 2020 has practised from chambers at 2 Hare Court since 2015, prosecuting and defending serious criminal allegations of murder, terrorism, sexual abuse and corruption. Atomic Weapons Establishment: Direct I should also like to take this opportunity to pay tribute Government Ownership to Mr Cayley who has served as Director for the last [HLWS537] seven years and worked hard with other Service Justice System stakeholders to improve the processes by which Baroness Goldie: My right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Defence (The Rt Hon Ben Wallace MP) has cases are built and brought to trial, whilst maintaining the made the following Written Ministerial Statement. necessary independence of prosecutorial decision-making. His efforts have ensured that the Authority has retained its In 1993 the Ministry of Defence (MOD) entered into a position as an independent and respected prosecuting Government owned Contractor operated (GoCo) body which has underpinned the operational effectiveness arrangement with Hunting-BRAE whereby Hunting- of the Armed Forces. BRAE operated the Atomic Weapons Establishment As he hands over his responsibilities to Mr Rees, I (AWE) on behalf of the Government. In 1999, following would like to express my personal gratitude for the a competitive tender, a new 25-year contract was awarded important contribution he has made. to AWE Management Ltd (AWE ML). On the 1 July 2019 the MOD triggered the Successor Ireland/Northern Ireland Protocol: Consent Arrangements clause with AWE ML to enable it to Mechanism Regulations consider alternative viable management options ahead of the current contract expiration. Although the existing [HLWS540] arrangements have brought stability to the organisation Viscount Younger of Leckie: My Right Hon. Friend the MOD has concluded that AWE will revert to a direct the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland (Brandon Government ownership model. Lewis) has today made the following statement: Under the revised arrangements, AWE plc will become I am today laying before both Houses of Parliament a an Arms-Length Body wholly owned by the MOD. It will draft of the Protocol on Ireland/Northern Ireland continue to be managed by a world leading team and a (Democratic Consent Process) (EU Exit) Regulations new Board will be appointed by the MOD. The new 2020 which will, if approved, reflect in domestic law the business model will see AWE plc continue to draw on consent mechanism set out in the Ireland/Northern Ireland private sector specialist support to strengthen capability as Protocol and the UK Government’s Unilateral Declaration well as playing a key role in managing capital projects of 17 October 2019. and contracts. This approach is recognised as best practice The consent mechanism ensures that Articles 5 to 10 of in other major complex programmes. the Protocol will cease to apply if Northern Ireland’s The MOD, AWE ML and AWE plc will jointly manage political representatives conclude they are no longer the termination of the contract and the transition to the desirable. The first consent process will take place in late new arrangements, which are anticipated to be completed 2024, and will be repeated every four or eight years by the end of June 2021. This will be completed in close depending on whether consent (if given) is given on a co-operation with workforce representatives, regulators, simple majority or a cross-community basis. Embedding the supply chain and the local community. that recognition of consent in the Protocol was intrinsic to its acceptance by this Government. The continued safe and secure operation of AWE sites The regulations implement both a default consent will remain the over-riding focus during the transition and procedure, which will apply if a First Minister and deputy under the revised management structure. First Minister are in office at the time notification of the start of the process is given, and an alternative consent Director of Service Prosecutions procedure, which will apply if a First Minister and deputy First Minister are not in office at the time notification of [HLWS538] the start of the process is given. The alternative procedure Baroness Goldie: My right hon. Friend the Secretary of enables any MLA to bring forward the consent motion in State for Defence (The Rt Hon Ben Wallace MP) has the absence of a First Minister and deputy First Minister. made the following Written Ministerial Statement. The Protocol was specifically designed to protect the Under section 364 of the Armed Forces Act 2006 the Belfast (Good Friday) Agreement and the gains of the Director of Service Prosecutions is appointed by Her peace process. The principle of consent is central to it, Majesty the Queen. The term of the current incumbent, ensuring that democratically elected local politicians Andrew Cayley QC, comes to an end on 2 November make decisions for the people of Northern Ireland. 2020. Page 2 2 November 2020 Written Statements Transport for London: Funding and have proposed that this could be done by an increased Financing council tax precept from April 2021. They will submit their proposals by 11 January 2021, alongside the fiscal [HLWS536] sustainability plan. The Government will take all steps Baroness Vere of Norbiton: My Right Honourable necessary at the appropriate times to enable this proposal. friend, the Secretary of State for Transport (Grant Extending the congestion charging zone to inner Shapps), has made the following Ministerial Statement. London has been ruled out by both the Government and The Government and the Mayor of London have agreed the Mayor. National travel concessions including free a second extraordinary funding and financing package for travel to school for those who qualify under the 1996 Transport for London for the period to 31 March 2021. It Education Act will continue to be funded by the replaces the agreement signed in May. It will ensure the Government. The Freedom Pass for pensioners and the continued operation of public transport services in disabled will continue as now. It is not funded by TfL or London and is proof of our commitment to supporting the the Mayor. capital and the transport network on which it depends. The full agreement can
Recommended publications
  • 130 NAPIER I (Naper, Napper) [Alington, Scott, Sturt] SCOTLAND
    130 List of Parliamentary Families NAPIER I (Naper, Napper) [Alington, Scott, Sturt] SCOTLAND & ENGLAND Baron Napier and Ettrick (1627- S and 1872- UK) Origins: The founder of the family made a fortune in the wool trade. Provost of Edinburgh 1403. His son, a merchant adventurer and courtier, was Kted 1452. Began purchasing estates in the 1530s. One family member fought at Flodden and another at Pinkie. Master of the Mint 1576. First [MP 1471 for Edinburgh]. Another [MP 1463, also for Edinburgh]. 1. Alexander Napier – [Stirlingshire 1690-1700] 2. Francis Napier – [Stirling Burgh 1698-1702] 3. Sir Charles Napier – Marylebone 1841-47 Southwark 1855-60 4. Sir Joseph Napier 1 Bt – Dublin University 1848-58 5. Mark Napier – Roxburghshire 1892-95 Seats: Thirlestane Castle (House, Tower), Selkirkshire (built late 16th c., rebuilt 1816- 20, remod. 1872, demolished 1965); Merchistoun (Merchiston) (Hall), Edinburghshire (purch. and built 1436, add. 16th c., remod. 18th c., sold 1914, later a school) Estates: Bateman 6991 (S) 2316 Titles: Baronet 1627-83; 1637- ; 1867- Peers: [2 peers 1660-86] 2 Scottish Rep peers 1796-1806 1807-23 1824-32 3 peers 1872- 1945 1 Ld Lt 18th-19 th 1 KT 19th Notes: John Napier of Merchistoun invented logarithms. 1, 2, 8, 9, and 10 Barons and seventeen others in ODNB. Scott Origins: Sir William Scott 2 Bt of Thirlestane married the daughter of the 5 Baron Napier. Their son took the name Napier and inherited the Barony and Thirlestane. The Scotts were cadets of the Scotts of Harden (see Home). Granted arms 1542 and acquired estates in the first half of the 16th century.
    [Show full text]
  • MINUTES of the 69 MEETING of AYNHO HISTORY SOCIETY HELD at the VILLAGE HALL, AYNHO on WEDNESDAY 25 JUNE 2014 Present
    MINUTES OF THE 69th MEETING OF AYNHO HISTORY SOCIETY HELD AT THE VILLAGE HALL, AYNHO ON WEDNESDAY 25th JUNE 2014 Present: - Peter Cole - Secretary. There were apologies from Rupert Clark due to work commitments 1. Chairman and Treasurer's Report In Rupert’s absence Peter reported that Middleton Cheney is holding a photographic exhibition on Saturday 19th July from 2pm to 4.30pm in All Saints Church, entitled “The Village – Then and Now”. There will be about 50 photos of Middleton Cheney taken between 1900 and 1930, accompanied by photos of the same view taken today. 2. Royal Mistresses Roger Powell The talk covers the period from 1509 to the present day, and concentrates on people who were royal mistresses for at least ten years. Indeed one was a mistress for 36 years. In many cases from a psychological point of view she was not just an object of desire but she more or less became a second wife, and sometimes even a mother to the king. The origin of the role in the early days of the Middle Ages derives from the many loveless royal marriages, as for kings the main reason for a marriage was to secure or maintain an alliance to build his empire or strengthen his position against enemies. Once a queen had given the king one or two heirs, he would forget or even abandon her and take a mistress. In England a royal mistress did not become a feature of court society until the 17th century. In France they had been around in the mid-1600s, but it took a while before England followed suit.
    [Show full text]
  • Saudi Arabia in Transition from Defense to Offense, but How to Score?
    v BELFER CENTER PAPER Saudi Arabia in Transition From Defense to Offense, But How to Score? Karen Elliott House SENIOR FELLOW PAPER JULY 2017 Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs Harvard Kennedy School 79 JFK Street Cambridge, MA 02138 www.belfercenter.org Statements and views expressed in this report are solely those of the author and do not imply endorsement by Harvard University, Harvard Kennedy School, or the Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs. Design & Layout by Andrew Facini Cover photo and opposite page 1: Deputy Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman arrives at the Hangzhou Exhibition Center to participate in G20 Summit, Sunday, Sept. 4, 2016 in Hangzhou, China. (Etienne Oliveau/Pool Photo via AP) Copyright 2017, President and Fellows of Harvard College Printed in the United States of America BELFER CENTER PAPER Saudi Arabia in Transition From Defense to Offense, But How to Score? Karen Elliott House SENIOR FELLOW PAPER JUNE 2017 About the Author Karen Elliott House is a senior fellow at the Belfer Center and author of “On Saudi Arabia: Its People, Past, Religion, Fault Lines—and Future,” published by Knopf in 2012. During a 32 year career at The Wall Street Journal she served as diplomatic correspondent, foreign editor and finally as Publisher of the paper. She won a Pulitzer Prize for International Reporting in 1984 for her coverage of the Middle East. She is chairman of the RAND Corporation. Her April 2016 report on Saudi Arabia, “Uneasy Lies the Head that Wears a Crown,” can be found at the Belfer Center’s website: http://www.belfercenter.org/publication/uneasy-lies-head-wears-crown The author, above, in rural Jizan Province in April 2009 with an elderly farmer and some of his 35 children (from three wives) and 30 grandchildren.
    [Show full text]
  • Titles – a Primer
    Titles – A Primer The Society of Scottish Armigers, INC. Information Leaflet No. 21 Titles – A Primer The Peerage – There are five grades of the peerage: 1) Duke, 2) Marquess, 3) Earl, 4) Viscount and 5) Baron (England, GB, UK)/Lord of Parliament (Scotland). Over the centuries, certain customs and traditions have been established regarding styles and forms of address; they follow below: a. Duke & Duchess: Formal style: "The Most Noble the Duke of (title); although this is now very rare; the style is more usually, “His Grace the Duke of (Hamilton), and his address is, "Your Grace" or simply, "Duke” or “Duchess.” The eldest son uses one of his father's subsidiary titles as a courtesy. Younger sons use "Lord" followed by their first name (e.g., Lord David Scott); daughters are "Lady" followed by their first name (e.g., Lady Christina Hamilton); in conversation, they would be addressed as Lord David or Lady Christina. The same rules apply to eldest son's sons and daughters. The wife of a younger son uses”Lady” prior to her husbands name, (e.g. Lady David Scot) b. Marquess & Marchioness: Formal style: "The Most Honourable the Marquess/Marchioness (of) (title)" and address is "My Lord" or e.g., "Lord “Bute.” Other rules are the same as dukes. The eldest son, by courtesy, uses one of his father’s subsidiary titles. Wives of younger sons as for Dukes. c. Earl & Countess: Formal style: "The Right Honourable the Earl/Countess (of) (title)” and address style is the same as for a marquess. The eldest son uses one of his father's subsidiary titles as a courtesy.
    [Show full text]
  • Born Prince & Princesses
    DUNFERMLINE – BORN PRINCE & PRINCESSES 2 DUNFERMLINE – BORN PRINCE & PRINCESSES BY J. B. MACKIE, F.J.I., Author of “Life and Work of Duncan McLaren.” “Modern Journalism.” “Margaret Queen and Saint.” & Dunfermline; DUNFERMLINE Journal Printing Works. 3 RUINS OF THE ABBEY CHOIR, AULD KIRK, & DUNFERMLINE. CIRCA A.D. 1570. (From Old Sketches and Plans.) 4 PREFACE. ____ These Sketches were written for the Dunfermline Journal for the purpose of quickening local interest and pride in the history of the ancient city. They are now published in book form in the hope that they may prove not an unwelcome addition to the historical memorials cherished by lovers of Dunfermline at home and abroad, and be found helpful to the increasing number of visitors, attracted by the fame of the city, so greatly enhanced within recent years by the more than princely benefactors of one of its devoted sons. J. B. M. Dunfermline, November, 1910. 5 Contents. _______ Chapter 1. - The Children of the Tower. Page 6 II. Edgar the Peaceable. 11 III. Alexander the Fierce. 15 IV. David “the Sair Sanct.” 23 V. Queen Matilda. 29 VI. Prince William and the Empress 35 Matilda. VII. Mary of Boulogne and her Daughter. 40 VIII. James I. 45 IX Elizabeth of Bohemia, “Queen of Hearts.” 54 X Charles I. 61 6 DUNFERMLINE BORN PRINCES AND PRINCESSES . CHAPTER 1 THE BIRTHPLAE OF ROYALTY – MALCOLM AND MARGARET’S FAMILY. Dunfermline has frequently been spoken and written about as a burial place of Scottish Royalty. In the eleventh century the centre of ecclesiastical power was transferred from Iona to Dunfermline, after the Culdee leadership had been overpowered by the authority of the Roman Church, and King Malcolm and Queen Margaret had made the seat of their Court the leading centre of religious worship.
    [Show full text]
  • The Story of the Duke of Zhou
    Indiana University, History G380 – class text readings – Spring 2010 – R. Eno 1.6 THE STORY OF THE DUKE OF ZHOU Next to Confucius himself, the greatest hero of ancient China, as viewed through the perspective of the later Confucian tradition, was a man known as the Duke of Zhou, one of the founders of the Zhou Dynasty. The Duke of Zhou is celebrated for two reasons. The first concerns his formidable political achievements. The texts tell us that two years after the conquest of the Shang, the Zhou conqueror King Wu died, leaving only one very young son to succeed him. While it was the Shang custom to pass the throne from older to younger brother within one generation, the tradition of the Zhou people had been that their throne should pass only from father to son. Upon the death of King Wu, his younger brother, the Duke of Zhou, seized power, claiming that it was his intention to preside only as an emergency measure until his nephew came of age and could properly receive the Mandate of Heaven. A number of the other brothers believed instead that the Duke was seizing the throne in the manner of former Shang kings and they raised a rebellion. The Duke not only put down the rebellion, but followed this forceful confirmation of his claim to ultimate power by actually doing what he had promised all along – when his nephew, the future King Cheng, came of age, the Duke ceded to him full authority to rule and retired to an advisory role. This sacrifice of power on the Duke’s part immeasurably enhanced the stature of the Zhou throne and the religious power of the concept of Heaven’s mandate.
    [Show full text]
  • David Teniers the Younger and Gallery Paintings Andrea Keppers
    Invention and the Court Copyist: David Teniers the Younger and Gallery Paintings Andrea Keppers As a court painter to the Hapsburg Archduke Leopold Wilhelm, from royal favor; it was one of the best ways to attain honor David Teniers the Younger became something of a specialist and fame, not to mention financial security. Having a connec- in the creation of gallery paintings, such as The Archduke’s tion to and the support of a princely patron elevated the artist Picture Gallery in Brussels, painted after 1654 (Figure 1). and in a sense legitimized his practice. While the position of Teniers depicted himself standing proudly next to the arch- court painter was coveted, it came with a degree of servitude duke and holding onto The Madonna of the Cherries by Titian that troubled some artists. Rubens, for instance, occupied the as if interpreting the painting for its owner. Teniers also in- same position that Teniers did for the governor of the south- cluded portraits of his other benefactors in the collection. Philip ern Netherlands, but demanded and enjoyed much greater free- IV of Spain, who owned several of Teniers’ paintings, is rep- dom. He was exempted from taxes, guild restrictions, and court resented in an oval portrait over the door, and a bust of Queen duties in Brussels so he could remain at home in Antwerp. In Christina of Sweden, from whom Teniers received a golden becoming Leopold Wilhelm’s court painter, Teniers had to chain of honor, hovers above the red-draped corner of Raphael’s move himself and his family from Antwerp to Brussels to re- St.
    [Show full text]
  • Return of the King Succession Scenarios in Saudi Arabia
    STATE STABILITY Return of the king Succession scenarios in Saudi Arabia Social protests in the Middle East and North Africa have forced Saudi Arabia’s King Abdullah to return to his country after a three-month absence. Guido Steinberg examines the political manoeuvring that is already underway to clarify the succession to the 87-year-old monarch. several different programmes. pertinent following the regime changes in The aim of this package appears to be to as- Egypt and Tunisia. Although there is no major KEY POINTS KEY POINTS KEY POINTS suage any discontent and bolster support for dissident movement in Saudi Arabia agitating • The return of Saudi Arabia’s King the regime. On 5 March, the government an- for reform or a regime change, there is poten- Abdullah to his country in February after nounced that all marches and protests were tial for political instability around the royal a three-month absence demonstrated the banned, indicating the regime’s desire to main- succession, particularly at the stage when the regime’s desire to reassure the population about the stability of the kingdom. tain control through inducements and en- candidate pool begins to shift from the genera- forcement. This is especially important given tion of Ibn Saud’s sons to his grandsons. • However, political manoeuvring is the king’s prolonged absence, which revived In October 2006, Abdullah seemingly for- already underway to clarify the succession, speculation about the royal succession and the malised the procedures to be followed in the with the system of succession from brother problems that may face the House of Saud over nomination of a crown prince.
    [Show full text]
  • Empress Matilda: Always the Consort, Never the Queen
    Portland State University PDXScholar Young Historians Conference Young Historians Conference 2016 Apr 28th, 10:30 AM - 11:45 AM Empress Matilda: Always the Consort, Never the Queen Sadie M. Kok-Carlson Clackamas High School Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/younghistorians Part of the European History Commons, and the Women's History Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Kok-Carlson, Sadie M., "Empress Matilda: Always the Consort, Never the Queen" (2016). Young Historians Conference. 7. https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/younghistorians/2016/oralpres/7 This Event is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Young Historians Conference by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. Kok­Carlson 1 Sadie Kok­Carlson Balzer Western Civ 5 December 2015 Empress Matilda: Always the Consort, Never the Queen March 1141 marked a monumental time for Matilda of England: she was given the title of Domina Anglorum, “Lady of the English”, officially designating her as a “female feudal lord” ​ ​ (Chibnall, Church Reform 114). The title was the first of Matilda’s that didn’t reference any relationship of hers with a man. She was “the daughter of Henry I of England, the widow of Holy Roman Emperor Henry V, and the mother to the future Henry II of England,” (Beem 1), as well as the widow of Count Geoffrey of Anjou, but none of these titles reflected her own achievements until 1141. Men defining the life of a woman certainly wasn’t new in any respect, and Matilda was constantly held back in and by a misogynist society.
    [Show full text]
  • Profile of a Prince Promise and Peril in Mohammed Bin Salman’S Vision 2030
    BELFER CENTER PAPER Profile of a Prince Promise and Peril in Mohammed bin Salman’s Vision 2030 Karen Elliott House SENIOR FELLOW PAPER APRIL 2019 Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs Harvard Kennedy School 79 JFK Street Cambridge, MA 02138 www.belfercenter.org Statements and views expressed in this report are solely those of the author and do not imply endorsement by Harvard University, the Harvard Kennedy School, or the Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs. Design and layout by Andrew Facini Cover photo: Fans react as they watch the “Greatest Royal Rumble” event in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, Friday, April 27, 2018. (AP Photo/Amr Nabil) Copyright 2019, President and Fellows of Harvard College Printed in the United States of America BELFER CENTER PAPER Profile of a Prince Promise and Peril in Mohammed bin Salman’s Vision 2030 Karen Elliott House SENIOR FELLOW PAPER APRIL 2019 About the Author Karen Elliott House is a senior fellow at the Belfer Center and author of On Saudi Arabia: Its People, Past, Religion, Fault Lines—and Future, published by Knopf in 2012. During a 32-year career at The Wall Street Journal she served as diplomatic correspondent, foreign editor, and finally as publisher of the paper. She won a Pulitzer Prize for International Reporting in 1984 for her coverage of the Middle East. She is chairman of the RAND Corporation. Her earlier Belfer Center reports on Saudi Arabia, “Saudi Arabia in Transition: From Defense to Offense, But How to Score?” (June 2017), and “Uneasy Lies the Head that Wears a Crown” (April 2016) can be found at www.belfercenter.org.
    [Show full text]
  • Saudi Arabia's Smooth Succession
    Saudi Arabia’s Smooth Succession: The King is Dead, Long Live the King Anthony H. Cordesman Once again, Saudi Arabia has managed its succession without problems, delay, or any signs of serious divisions within the royal family. One of its most competent and impressive kings has died, but the Crown Prince – Prince Salman – officially became king virtually at the time King Abdullah’s death was announced. Moreover, Prince Muqrin immediately became the full Crown Prince, ensuring that one of the youngest sons of Ibn Saud would become king or de facto ruler if Prince Salman became incapacitated or died. Within less than 24 hours, the new King also announced a whole list of new appointments that gave the next generation of princes more power and helped prepare for the succession after Prince Muqrin: Crown Prince Muqrin bin Abdulaziz Al Saud was also appointed Deputy Premier. Prince Mohammed bin Naif bin Abdulaziz Al Saud became Deputy Crown Prince, Second Deputy Premier, and Minister of Interior. Prince Mohammed bin Salman bin Abdulaziz Al Saud became the Minister of Defense, and was relieved of his position as Chief of the Crown Prince's Court and Advisor to the Crown Prince, while continuing as the Minister of the State and Member of the Cabinet at the rank of minister. Hamad bin Abdulaziz Al-Suwailem, Deputy Chief of the Crown Prince's Court, was relieved of his position and appointed the Chief of the Crown Prince's Court at the rank of minister. Khalid bin Abdulaziz Al-Tuwaijri, Chief of the Royal Court and Private Secretary of the Custodian of the Two Holy Mosques, was relieved of his position.
    [Show full text]
  • Hans Holbein the Younger
    In focus: Hans Holbein the Younger A learning resource featuring works from the National Portrait Gallery Collection, one of a series focusing on particular artists whose practice has changed the way we think about the art of British portraiture and who have in turn influenced others. Page 2 of 16 National Portrait Gallery In focus: Hans Holbein the Younger Contents Introduction ⁄ 2 1: General context ⁄ 3 Hans Holbein the Younger (1497/8–1543) ⁄ 3 Holbein, his influence and impact ⁄ 5 2: Work in context ⁄ 5 The drawing ⁄ 5 The print ⁄ 8 3: Copied paintings ⁄ 9 Reproductions ⁄ 9 Printed portraits of royal women ⁄ 13 General enquiry questions ⁄ 14 Further research ⁄ 14 Introduction It can be useful to look at developments in portrait painting through the lens of a single, significant artist, appreciating their techniques and innovations, and the way that they have been influenced by the advances of others and how in making their contribution they in turn influenced others. Each resource focuses on a limited number of artworks from the National Portrait Gallery Collection and details taken from them. It includes questions about the practice and historical context of the artist, with suggested lines of enquiry and ideas for classroom activity, plus links for further research. The aim is to support teachers in encouraging students to investigate the artist and their practice in- depth. The narrow focus on the work of Hans Holbein the Younger (1497/8–1543) enables a concentrated view exploring qualities of his unique linear style. This resource coincides with the exhibition, The Encounter: Drawings from Leonardo to Rembrandt (13 July to 22 October 2017) at the National Portrait Gallery, London, and the related permanent Tudor display.
    [Show full text]