The General Psychologist

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The General Psychologist American Psychology Association (APA) A Publication of the Society of General Psychology ‐ Division 1 The General Psychologist American Psychology Association (APA) Society for General Psychology Volume 49, Issue 2 April 6th, 2015 Inside this issue Stop! Don’t flip that President’s Column ..................... …………...3 Division 1 Mission Statement & Goals…….5 electric switch! Elecon Statements ................... …………..6‐8 Student Corner………………………………………9 Join Division 1!.........................................10 Editor’s Note ………………………………………..11 Division 1 Mentored Acvies…….………..24‐26 Division 1 Member Acvies………………..27‐29 Crossword Puzzle………………………………...38‐39 Member Profiles ………………………………….41 Online Subscribers………………………………..42 Special points of interest Book Review: Sing Together: Essenal Chronicling the experience of Ed English ‐ Skills for Mindfulness Based Psychothera- py (11‐14) Camera‐man for Stanley Milgram’s experiment Book Releases from our members (14, 40) As cameraman and editor for Stanley Milgram’s original docu- Alfred Adler’s profound understanding of mentary “Obedience,” I have, over the years, come to believe that social movaon—Eva Dreikurs Ferguson (18‐21) his experiment never attained the impact on society at large that Spotlight on Past Presidents of Division 1 ‐ it might have had. I suggest, in this personal comment, that it Edward C. Tolman (22‐23) was too powerful to receive acceptance at a time when the au- Ernest R. Hilgard’s Award Lecture— thority of the government and military establishment were being Morton Ann Gernsbacher (29‐37) challenged. The many comparisons of the study to the tragedy of the Holocaust overshadowed most applications of the study to the war in Vietnam. Sadly, the more sensational aspects of the study were emphasized, often out of context, except among an informed minority. My hope is that scholars will work to correct this for Milgram himself, the psychology profession, and the good of society. Stop! Don’t lip that switch! By Edward English Introduction the “leader/actor” even when it seemed who allowed the atrocities of the Holocaust On August 28, 2013, I was surprised increasingly apparent that the “learner/ because they claimed to be just obeying to hear a review on National Public Radio actor” was experiencing pain. Predictions, orders. This raised serious doubts for her by Leonard Lopate of Gina Perry’s book on prior to the actual experiment, even by psy- about Milgram’s experiment that she de- Stanley Milgram’s “Obedience” experiment. chiatrists, stated that only a pathological tailed in her book. Serendipitously, the author requested an fringe of one or two percent would continue I told Ms. Perry I was very grateful to interview with me the next day. She did through to the maximum shock of 450 volts, her for explaining the plight of the partici- extensive research for her book, and, she (Milgram, 1973a). Astonishingly, the re- pants to me. I had not thought of this spe- was interested in speaking with me because sults of the experiment showed that almost ciically before and am deeply sympathetic I’m listed in the ilm credits of “Obedience”, half of the “teachers” across different exper- to them. (I never saw the CBS TV version.) a documentary record of the Milgram ex- I still vividly remember many of the people periment. she interviewed and I too have had trou- The title of Gina Perry’s book “Behind bling thoughts over the years but from a the Shock Machine: The untold story of the decidedly different perspective. notorious Milgram psychology experi- Filming secretly over Filming secretly over 50 years ago, ments” (2013) indicates how the publisher 50 years ago, behind a behind a two-way mirror, I could not be- may be trying to capitalize on the sensation- lieve as I was zooming in on the faces of alism that has undermined Milgram’s pow- two-way mirror, I could many of the “teachers”, that they could con- erful experiment through the years. The ceivably lip to the next higher voltage psychology profession has frequently de- not believe as I was switch to shock the poor “learner”. Their bated the controversial ethical aspects of zooming in on the faces actions continued even after escalating calls the experiment, thereby not encouraging from the ‘learner’ asking to stop, demanding further research except for “Milgram of many of the to be let go, crying out in agony, pleadings lite,” (Burger, 2009; Elms, 2009). Ms. Perry because of a heart condition, to ultimately told me that she had studied Milgram in her “teachers”, that they non-responsiveness. At this point only the early psychology courses and was intrigued, sound of the switch being clicked at 450 as many other students were, with the set- could conceivably flip to volts was heard. And all this merely because up for the experiment. the next higher voltage of routine-sounding prompts to continue by In 1960, when I graduated from the a man in an off-white lab coat with a clip free, public City College of New York, I was switch to shock the board who sat nonchalantly behind the fortunate to land an assignment at the pres- “teachers.” tigious Yale University, to make Russian poor “learner,”. This took place after I had ilmed the language training ilms for the US Ofice of “teachers” undergoing a slight shock them- Education. The University also gave me the selves to feel what would be given to the opportunity to work with Stanley Milgram. “learner.” Each “teacher” was asked to sit in He explained that the experiment he was an old-fashioned, wooden chair with lat conducting may expose the inherent dan- arm supports. Some special electrode paste imental variations willingly inlicted electric gers in blindly obeying authority. Publical- was applied to the arm that was to be shock punishment on the ly, two subjects were recruited for the ex- shocked. It was explained that the paste “learners,” (Milgram, 1973a). periment to investigate if electric shock would help to avoid blisters and burns. A given as punishment can improve learning. mild shock was given and each subject said The “leader” of the experiment asked the Filming the ‘subject’ experience they deinitely felt it. The leader told them two subjects to draw slips of paper to de- Ms. Perry said she was greatly inlu- it was only 45 volts. Casually, the “teachers” cide who will be the “learner” and who will enced by the 1975 CBS TV program, “The were given a paper towel to wipe their fore- be the “teacher.” The drawing was rigged so Tenth Level,” featuring William Shatner arm and then led into an adjacent room in the newcomer was always the “teacher” and playing Stanley Milgram. The ilm opened order to administer the test objectively the actual “subject” of the experiment. The dramatically with a camera shot of a train apart from the “learner” who had been left “learner” and the “leader” were both transporting Jews to the gas chamber. Much strapped into what resembled an electric trained as confederates (acting according to later when she began her research and dili- chair. Milgram’s instructions). I understood the gently interviewed all the participants in experiment was really designed to ind out Milgram’s experiment, she learned how if, and how far the newcomer or “teacher/ deeply the subjects felt the shame of being subject” was willing to follow orders from compared on national television to people Connued on page 15 2 President’s Column Joan C. Chrisler, Ph.D. It is difficult to believe that my presi‐ statement and develop a set of goals. (You denal year is more than half over already! will be able to read these documents else‐ The me has flown by, but a lot has been where in this issue of the newsleer.) The accomplished. Here I will share some of the goals we developed are intended to be both highlights with you. descripve and aspiraonal. That is, they cover all of our current, tradional acvies Our energec program chair, Maria del (i.e., our awards, the newsleer, the journal, Pilar Grazioso, has put together a diverse the convenon program, the Staats lecture), and interesng set of papers, posters, sym‐ and they are broad enough to encompass posia, and conversaon hours for the Toron‐ new program iniaves we might take to APA convenon. In addion, of course, (some of which were discussed at the we have invited addresses by last year’s meeng, but others we have not yet imag‐ award winners, and several other invited ined). addresses and invited panels. She and her team of student assistants are at work now Our treasurer, Deborah Johnson, re‐ planning acvies to take place in our divi‐ ported to us that we are in excellent finan‐ sional hospitality suite. I hope that many of cial shape, and she presented us with a 2015 you will be able to be in Toronto to enjoy budget, which we tweaked a bit and then the program. voted to implement. We agreed that we tradional rerement age of 65. If we are would use our newly established goals to 2015 marks the 70th anniversary of going to survive and thrive for the next 70 guide our budgeng so that we spend our the founding of Division 1, and we will be years, we need to recruit and retain new funds primarily on projects and acvies celebrang 70 years of bringing psychology members, especially those at the beginning that contribute to the achievement of our together. If you will be in Toronto, please of their careers. If you want to celebrate goals. Our treasurer expressed concern that plan to join us at the Division 1 Social Hour Division 1’s anniversary, whether you can we have too much money in our checking to eat anniversary cake and share your fa‐ aend the party or not, the best way to do account, and we agreed to seek informaon vorite memories of the division’s acvies so is to reach out to a colleague or student and advice about invesng it more wisely.
Recommended publications
  • Would New Yorkers Help a Lost Child? 1976 V 2008?
    Modern Psychological Studies Volume 15 Number 1 Article 5 2009 Would New Yorkers help a lost child? 1976 v 2008? Amanda Verdi Fordham University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.utc.edu/mps Part of the Psychology Commons Recommended Citation Verdi, Amanda (2009) "Would New Yorkers help a lost child? 1976 v 2008?," Modern Psychological Studies: Vol. 15 : No. 1 , Article 5. Available at: https://scholar.utc.edu/mps/vol15/iss1/5 This articles is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals, Magazines, and Newsletters at UTC Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Modern Psychological Studies by an authorized editor of UTC Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Amanda Vardi Would New Yorkers help Fordham University a lost child: 1976 v 2008? To test the notion of urban "stimulus overload" (Milgram, 1970), this study replicates a 1977 "lost child" experiment, with a child (age 9 or 10) asking 146 New Yorkers for help. As expected: (a) The rate of New Yorkers who helped a lost child rose significantly, from 46% in 1977 to 61.6% in 2008. (b) When debriefed and told that the lost child was actually part of an experiment, only 11% of New Yorkers expressed a negative reaction, compared with 55% who reacted positively. In fact, the more helpful one's behavior, the more positive their later reaction to debriefing (r = +.67, p < .001). The implications of these findings are discussed, regarding the future methods and findings of urban psychology research. Throughout history, the city has often been the following two questions: how does the city associated with a negative attitude; researchers refer impact the individual and why do people live in to this as the anti-urban bias (Steiner, 1977; cities.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliotheca Sacra
    Critical Noles. [Jan. ARTICLE X. CRITICAL NOTES. ROYCE'S "CONCEPTION OF GOD.") THIS work is a report of a discussion held before the Philosophical Union of the University of California in 1895. It coittains the leading address of the symposium by Professor Royce; remarks, critical and con­ structive, by the other participants in the discussion; and finally a sup­ plemental essay by Professor Royce in which he develops more thor­ oughly his central doctrine, and replies to his critics. It is apparent, from Professor Royce's introductory remarks, that the Philosophical Union of the University has beeu studying his work, "The Religious Aspect of Philosophy." .. Were there time, I should be glad indeed if I were able to throw any light 011 that little book. But my time is short. The great problems of philosophy are pressing. It is the death of your philosophizing if you come to believe anything merely be­ cause you have once maintained it. Let us lay aside, then, both text and tradition, and come face to face with ollr philosophical problem it­ self" (pp. 5, 6). This seems to breathe a spirit of admirable candor; but if, as we shall find later, the conclusions of Royce's present discussion are utterly irreconcilable with his results in .. The Religious Aspect," it would seem more candid, and also a saving of time, at least for the stu­ dents of the Philosophical Union, to recognize and deal thoroughly with this fact at the outset. In seeking a philosophical conception of God, Royce begins with the idea of an Omniscient Being.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Destructiveness and Authority: the Milgram Experiments and the Perpetration of Genocide
    W&M ScholarWorks Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 1995 Human Destructiveness and Authority: The Milgram Experiments and the Perpetration of Genocide Steven Lee Lobb College of William & Mary - Arts & Sciences Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd Part of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior Commons, Political Science Commons, and the Social Psychology Commons Recommended Citation Lobb, Steven Lee, "Human Destructiveness and Authority: The Milgram Experiments and the Perpetration of Genocide" (1995). Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects. Paper 1539625988. https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.21220/s2-yeze-bv41 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. HUMAN DESTRUCTIVENESS AND AUTHORITY: THE MILGRAM EXPERIMENTS AND THE PERPETRATION OF GENOCIDE A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Department of Government The College of William and Mary in Virginia In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts by Steve Lobb 1995 APPROVAL SHEET This thesis is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Steve Lobb Approved, November 1995 L )\•y ^ . Roger Smith .onald Rapi limes Miclot i i TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Can We Still Use Milgram's 'Obedience to Authority' Experiments to Explain Mass Atrocities After the Op
    JPR Milgram Revisited: Can we still use Milgram’s ‘Obedience to Authority’ Experiments to Explain Mass Atrocities after the Opening of the Archives? Review Essay Alette Smeulers Introduction ilgram’s ‘obedience to authority experiments’ are, together with Zimbardo’s prison experiment, one of the most famous but also most controversial studies ever conducted.1 Since its first publication in 1963, Milgram’s Mresearch has drawn the attention not only of scholars but also of the media, and the experiment as well as the results have been widely debated and referenced, but also heavily criticized.2 The 50th anniversary of his experiments and the opening of the Yale archives led to a new wave of publications and criticism. A lot of material on the Milgram experiments which until then had been hidden from scholarly and public scrutiny cast serious doubts on Milgram’s actual findings and their relevance.3 Between 2011 and 2015, no fewer than four internation- al peer-reviewed journals published a special issue on Milgram’s experiments: The Psychologist in 2011, edited by Reicher and Haslam; Theoretical & Applied Ethics in 2013, edited by Herara; the Journal of Social Issues in 2014, edited by Reicher, Haslam and Miller; and Theory & Psychology in 2015, edited by Brannigan, Nicholson and Cherry. In addition, Gina Perry published a book on the Milgram experiments in 2012 entitled Behind the Shock Machine: The Untold Story of the Notorious I wish to thank Maria Ioannou, Chris Atkinson, George Smeulers, Nicola Quaedvlieg, and the editors of the journal for their useful suggestions, comments and corrections. 1 Stanley Milgram, Obedience to Authority: An Experimental View (New York: Harper and Row, 1974); Philip G.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hiring of James Mark Baldwin and James Gibson Hume at Toronto in 1889
    History of Psychology Copyright 2004 by the Educational Publishing Foundation 2004, Vol. 7, No. 2, 130–153 1093-4510/04/$12.00 DOI: 10.1037/1093-4510.7.2.130 THE HIRING OF JAMES MARK BALDWIN AND JAMES GIBSON HUME AT THE UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO IN 1889 Christopher D. Green York University In 1889, George Paxton Young, the University of Toronto’s philosophy professor, passed away suddenly while in the midst of a public debate over the merits of hiring Canadians in preference to American and British applicants for faculty positions. As a result, the process of replacing Young turned into a continuation of that argument, becoming quite vociferous and involving the popular press and the Ontario gov- ernment. This article examines the intellectual, political, and personal dynamics at work in the battle over Young’s replacement and its eventual resolution. The outcome would have an impact on both the Canadian intellectual scene and the development of experimental psychology in North America. In 1889 the University of Toronto was looking to hire a new professor of philosophy. The normally straightforward process of making a university appoint- ment, however, rapidly descended into an unseemly public battle involving not just university administrators, but also the highest levels of the Ontario govern- ment, the popular press, and the population of the city at large. The debate was not pitched solely, or even primarily, at the level of intellectual issues, but became intertwined with contentious popular questions of nationalism, religion, and the proper place of science in public education. The impact of the choice ultimately made would reverberate not only through the university and through Canada’s broader educational establishment for decades to come but, because it involved James Mark Baldwin—a man in the process of becoming one of the most prominent figures in the study of the mind—it also rippled through the nascent discipline of experimental psychology, just then gathering steam in the United States of America.
    [Show full text]
  • Gender and Modernity in Transnational Perspective: Hugo Munsterberg and the American Woman
    Gender and Modernity in Transnational Perspective: Hugo Munsterberg and the American Woman RENA SANDERSON INTRODUCTION TN ONE OF THE FIRST and best-known collections of cultural criticism in .LAmerica, Civilization in the United States (1922), Harold Stearns begins his chapter on "The Intellectual Life" with this widely quoted passage: When Professor Einstein roused the ire of the women's clubs by stating that "women dominate the entire life of Amer- ica," and that "there are cities with a million population, but cities suffering from terrible poverty - the poverty of intellec- tual things," he was but repeating a criticism of our life now old enough to be almost a clichi. Hardly any intelligent foreigner has failed to observe and comment upon the extraordinary femi- nization of American social life, and oftenest he has coupled this observation with a few biting remarks concerning the intel- lectual anaemia or torpor that seems to accompany it. Stearns goes on to argue that, in the case of America's feminization, "the spontaneous judgment of the perceptive foreigner is to a remarkable de- gree correct."1 By invoking the foreigner's perspective, Stearns was try- ing to impart a certain freshness to what would otherwise have been old news. Although Stearns was speaking of Einstein, his description of the "perceptive foreigner" applies even more fittingly to another German- Jewish intellectual, Hugo Munsterberg (1863-1916).2 Starting some two decades prior to the publication of Civilization in the United States, Mun- sterberg surveyed many of the same phenomena treated in that anthol- ogy and anticipated many of its criticisms of American culture.
    [Show full text]
  • The Stanley Milgram Films on Social Psychology
    THE STANLEY MILGRAM FILMS ON SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY learn more at alexanderstreet.com The Stanley Milgram Films on Social Psychology “The social psychology of this century reveals a major lesson: often it is not so much the kind of person a man is as the kind of situation in which he finds himself that determines how he will act.”—Stanley Milgram Stanley Milgram became a controversial and compelling public figure as a result of his shocking 1961 experiment, Obedience to Authority, which revealed the extraordinary actions average people will take to follow orders. The film Obedience, which documented the experiment and provided visual evidence of the results, began Milgram’s interest in film as an educational tool. He went on to create five more films over the course of his career on other social psychology topics, all of which are now available in online streaming format for the first time, exclusively from Alexander Street. The streaming format offers functionality for teaching and learning not available anywhere else, including synchronized scrolling transcripts that run alongside each film; a visual table of contents; permanent URLs that let users cite and share video; an embeddable video player for easy sharing through course management systems; rich playlist functionality that lets users create, annotate, and organize clips and link to other content; multiple, simultaneous viewings on and off campus; and a streaming platform that is JAWS compatible as well as ADA Section 508-compliant to the highest degree possible. Milgram also conducted research that includes the well-known studies in small world (the source of “Six Degrees of Separation”), the lost-letter technique, mental maps of cities, the familiar stranger, and other important work central to the study of social psychology.
    [Show full text]
  • Victor Lenzen Papers, [Ca
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/tf0580018d No online items Guide to the Victor Lenzen Papers, [ca. 1904-1975] Processed by The Bancroft Library staff The Bancroft Library. University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, California, 94720-6000 Phone: (510) 642-6481 Fax: (510) 642-7589 Email: [email protected] URL: http://bancroft.berkeley.edu © 1997 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Note History --History, University of California --History, UC SystemHistory --History, University of California --History, UC BerkeleyGeographical (By Place) --University of California --University of California BerkeleySocial Sciences --Anthropology --ArchaeologyPhysical Sciences --PhysicsSocial Sciences --Education Guide to the Victor Lenzen BANC MSS 76/206 c 1 Papers, [ca. 1904-1975] Guide to the Victor Lenzen Papers, [ca. 1904-1975] Collection number: BANC MSS 76/206 c The Bancroft Library University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, California Contact Information: The Bancroft Library. University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, California, 94720-6000 Phone: (510) 642-6481 Fax: (510) 642-7589 Email: [email protected] URL: http://bancroft.berkeley.edu Processed by: The Bancroft Library staff Date Completed: ca. 1976 Encoded by: Xiuzhi Zhou © 1997 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Collection Summary Collection Title: Victor Lenzen papers, Date (inclusive): [ca. 1904-1975] Collection Number: BANC MSS 76/206 c Creator: Lenzen, Victor Fritz, 1890-1975 Extent: Number of containers: 5 cartons, 7 boxes and 1 oversize folder Repository: The Bancroft Library. Berkeley, California 94720-6000 Physical Location: For current information on the location of these materials, please consult the Library's online catalog. Abstract: Letters written to Lenzen and copies of letters by him; Mss.
    [Show full text]
  • “Nervous Diseases” and the Politics of Healing: William James, Josiah Royce, and the Early Dynamic Psychiatry Movement in America
    Article . “Nervous Diseases” and the Politics of Healing: William James, Josiah Royce, and the Early Dynamic Psychiatry Movement in America Matthew D. Bessette SUNY-Brockport Abstract A prominent feature of the postbellum, industrialized landscape in America was a preoccupation with a protean illness that sapped the vitality of otherwise healthily- constituted people. Termed neurasthenia, and otherwise known as the disease of civilization, the sociomedical discourse that formed around it became the cultural idiom through which a variety of elites, nonspecialists, and medical professionals negotiated their way through a changing social order. Yet social and cultural conflict was also ingrained in this discourse and the optimistic healing narrative that accompanied it. This becomes evident by analyzing the critical writings of William James and Josiah Royce, two Harvard philosophers, public intellectuals, and well- respected psychologists within the “Boston School” of psychology, against the influential articles and treatises that the incipient dynamic psychiatry movement within American medicine generated from 1909 through the Great War. Thus beyond exploring the ways in which the desire for cultural and personal renewal was held in common, the task left to historical inquiry is to analyze the reasons why it diverged between those who saw a fresh need to resuscitate the traditional republican virtues of discipline, self-reliance, and civic responsibility by allowing strenuous, ethical ideals to flourish in everyday life, and those who envisioned the enlightened direction and intervention of scientific physicians ushering in a new age of psychosomatic health and societal progress. A prominent feature of the postbellum, industrialized landscape in America was a preoccupation with a protean illness that sapped the vitality of otherwise healthily-constituted people.
    [Show full text]
  • Learning Theory This Course Will Cover the Fundamentals Of
    Learning Theory This course will cover the fundamentals of pedagogy and andragogy, as well as examine different theories in learning. We will analyze the particular characteristics of adult learning, identifying the contributions of theoretical and scientific support to andragogy, its principles and applications. Also we will evaluate the concept and importance of permanent or life-long education. Hopefully you will come away with a better sense of how humans learn and how you in particular can continue to learn. What is learning? Learning involves change. It is concerned with the acquisition of habits, knowledge, and attitudes. It enables the individual to make both personal and social adjustments. Since the concept of change is inherent in the concept of learning, any change in behavior implies that learning is taking place or has taken place. Learning that occurs during the process of change can be referred to as the learning process. Learning is a change in the individual, due to the interaction of that individual, and his environment, which fills a need to make him more capable of dealing adequately with his environment. A distinction is frequently made between education and learning. Education is an activity undertaken or initiated by one or more agents that is designed to effect changes in the knowledge, skill, and attitudes of individuals, groups, or communities. The term education emphasizes the educator, the agent of change who presents stimuli and reinforcement for learning and designs activities to induce change. The term learning, in contrast, emphasizes the person in whom the change occurs or is expected to occur.
    [Show full text]
  • Situational Pressure, Racial Stereotypes, and Conformity in Laboratory Aggression
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF William David Brant for the degree of Master of Arts in Interdisciplinary Studies in Psychology, Sociology, and Statistics presented on May 2, 1978 SITUATIONAL PRESSURE, RACIAL STEREOTYPES, AND CONFORMITY IN LABORATORY AGGRESSION Redacted for Privacy Abstract Approved: (Dr. Knud S. Larsen) This investigation was designed to assess the effects of a victim's race and stereotypical characteristics on another subject's willingness to administer punishment within the context of a teacher-learner paradigm. In addition, this study sought to empirically test the validity of the social-psychological theory that states that theories of social behavior are primarily reflections of contemporary history. Specific to the paradigm involved in this investigation, this theory advocates that the availability of information concerning models of social conformity sen- sitizes people to factors that may lead them into socially deplorable actions. In other words, if this theory is valid, we would expect that subjects' familiarity with information concerning the pressures and typical outcomes involved in this type of situation would insulate them against the future efficacy of these same factors when confronted with them in a similar situation. Utilizing Milgram's "remote condition" teacher-learner paradigm and the methodological modifications intro- duced by Larsen, forty-four male and female subjects were exposed to either a black or white "learner", either portraying an assimilative or salient stereotype in appearance, speech
    [Show full text]
  • Organizing Knowledge and Behavior at Yale's Institute of Human Relations Author(S): J
    Organizing Knowledge and Behavior at Yale's Institute of Human Relations Author(s): J. G. Morawski Source: Isis, Vol. 77, No. 2 (Jun., 1986), pp. 219-242 Published by: University of Chicago Press on behalf of History of Science Society Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/232650 Accessed: 22-12-2015 00:42 UTC Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/ info/about/policies/terms.jsp JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. History of Science Society and University of Chicago Press are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Isis. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 129.133.6.95 on Tue, 22 Dec 2015 00:42:52 UTC All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions Organizing Knowledge and Behavior at Yale's Institute of Human Relations By J. G. Morawski* IN 1929 JAMES ANGELL, president of Yale, announced plans for a unique teaching and research center for those fields "directly concerned with the problems of man's individual and group conduct. The purpose is to correlate knowledge and coordinate technique in related fields that greater progress may be made in the understanding of human life. The time has certainly come once again to attempt a fruitful synthesis of knowledge." The New York Times described the experiment as dismantling the disciplinary "Great Wall of China" and compared it with the Renaissance transformation of knowledge.1 The Insti- tute of Human Relations (IHR), as the center was named, received over $4.5 million from the Rockefeller Foundation for its first decade of operation.
    [Show full text]