On a Positive Sense of Arthur Schopenhauer's Pessimism Applied to Strategic Management

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

On a Positive Sense of Arthur Schopenhauer's Pessimism Applied to Strategic Management Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences 6 (2015 8) 1290-1299 ~ ~ ~ УДК 141.201 On a Positive Sense of Arthur Schopenhauer’s Pessimism Applied to Strategic Management Alexey I. Trotsak* The Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University 14 Nevskogo, Kaliningrad, 236041, Russia Received 24.01.2015, received in revised form 14.02.2015, accepted 20.05.2015 Some philosophers understand the pessimistic model of Schopenhauer like finished product. Pessimistic ideas, issued from the Plato and Buddhism, have been transformed by Schopenhauer in the full-fledged vision of World and human moral. However, this phenomenon or paradigm ought to be not only negative sense, but new positive concerning of pessimism in the strategic management in nowadays economy. That is why this article deals with the attempt of practical adaptation of the system pessimism by A. Schopenhauer as positive model: cautious strategy of behavior. It is used an analogy and the principle of ”Maximin”, which is spread on strategic management. The result of such interpretation can also be applied to social sciences and interdisciplinary researches. Keywords: pessimism, strategic management, ethics, casuistic situation, Schopenhauer. Research area: philosophy. 1. Interpretation opus The World as Will and Idea. It leaves one of Schopenhauer’s pessimism with the impression as if life was something In this article it applies the logical method meaningless; as if it was something that was of “reductio ad absurdum” to my remarks. This not worth caring for. We conclude this, since method is quite simple and can be a clear form he is saying the following: of demonstration that allows us to completely …life of our body is only a constantly grab our path of thought. The assumption is: prevented dying, an ever-postponed death: the Pessimism of Schopenhauer denies the will finally, in the same way, the activity of to life and therefore life is unimportant and our mind is a constantly deferred. Every coincidental. breath we draw wards off the death that is As a matter of fact, Schopenhauer constantly intruding upon us. In this way himself leads his readers to the conception we fight with it every moment, and again, at that he denies the will to life. This is the longer intervals, through every meal we eat, claim, which he even uses as a title in one every sleep we take, every time we warm of the last chapters of the first volume in his ourselves (Schopenhauer, 1909, p. 400). © Siberian Federal University. All rights reserved * Corresponding author E-mail address: [email protected] – 1290 – Alexey I. Trotsak. On a Positive Sense of Arthur Schopenhauer’s Pessimism Applied to Strategic Management From a linguistic point of view the words light. One encounters a multitude of negative “pessimism” and “optimism” are the superlatives evaluations. Especially in Russian philosophy of their corresponding adjectives. “Bonus” a negative attitude in the treatment of his work (good, positive, well-tempered) is becoming becomes apparent. Petr Kalatschinski, for “optimus” in the superlative, “malus” becoming example, writes in his book the following: “pessimus”. I want to address two inter pretations “From man being a goal driven creature, of optimism and pessimism in Schopenhauer, capable of having desires, does not follow which shall serve us as a testimony to the general that he is doomed to suffering; nature character of Schopenhauer’s Philosophy. neither denies him the forces nor the 1) The reading of optimism and pessimism, means to satisfy his desires, she gives him based on the system of possible worlds, the opportunity to extract joy from this. in which our world is perceived either Without need and poverty there wouldn’t as the best or the worst of all possible be any well-being, because well-being worlds (or something in between these is just that which compensates for the two). deficiencies. <…> When we succeed to 2) The Interpretation of optimism and complete our challenges and achieve our pessimism through the framework of the desired goals, we are filled with elevated historical process. feelings of satisfaction not only because In the first case our world is, because of we achieved the wanted result, but also its imperfection, the worst. In the second case, because we did it with our own strength” the scientific value of history is denied. For (Kalatschinski, 1887, p. 126). Schopenhauer its designated role is nothing In the German philosophical tradition more than to be the memory of the human race, Schopenhauer’s pessimism is explained through in which self-consciousness is presented to the prism of Buddhism, e.g. J. Rehmke (Rehmke, humankind. From this standpoint history mirrors 1882, S. 19 – 33). the suppressed existence of man, and likewise This historical view leads to an understanding his committed errors. His being is transformed of the roots of Schopenhauer’s teachings, but into a succession of random events. As he says: it doesn’t contribute to a reconstruction of his “Therefore, there is no system of history, paradigm. as there is of every other science. It is An attempt to understand the pessimism of therefore certainly rational knowledge, Schopenhauer from the angle of his intelligible but it is not a science. For it never knows character is undertaken in the dissertation of the particular by means of the general, but David Neumark (Neumark, 1896, S. 82−85). must comprehend the particular directly, Usually the analysis of pessimism is done by and so, as it were, creeps along the ground starting with the term of Will, as seen in J. of experience” (Schopenhauer, 1996, p. Garewicz (Garewicz, 2002, S. 15 −17). 217). But none of his successors tried to break out Just in this conception of history, the careful and bust the framework of contextual analysis approach Schopenhauer’s to human action and in the study of Schopenhauer. Most interpreters his hope for a transformation of the world is are still roaming in the hermeneutical circle, displayed. But none of his interpreters is willing which sets certain limits to the interpretative to see Schopenhauer’s pessimism in a positive potential. – 1291 – Alexey I. Trotsak. On a Positive Sense of Arthur Schopenhauer’s Pessimism Applied to Strategic Management 2. The positive role of Pessimism of a life-affirming behavior and consequently it It needs to be underlined, that in his major doesn’t rule out the transformation of the world works Schopenhauer perceives the role of human for the better. beings in this world as a quite tragic one. But in It is necessary to carry out a synthesis of his writings for “the common man” (his popular economical conceptions and the philosophy of writings) his thought and style take on a very Schopenhauer to be able to treat the positive different coloring. For instance, in his book role of pessimism in a constructive way. For “Aphorismen zur Lebensweisheit” [“Aphorisms this purpose we want to make use of the term, on the Wisdom of Life”] he gives advice on how strategic management to open up the possibility to understand and develop oneself and on what to generate a “pessimistic scenario”. to avoid. In his text the tendency to propagate a cautious way of living is clearly visible. He is 3. Strategic management talking about a reasonable way of living, which is and a Maximin principle meant to help the individual to evaluate his gifts First, we want to take on some of the basic and talents objectively. characteristics of strategic management. It has „To live with complete prudence to be highlighted that there is an abundance of and to gather out of one’s experience all definitions for strategic management. Only a few the wisdom it contains, it is necessary to of them shall be mentioned here. B.C. Bowman often think back and to recap what one has for example is telling us the following: experienced, done and felt by it, and also “Strategic management is the type of to compare one’s former judgment with the administrative occupation that concerns present one and the intentions and ambitions itself with defining tasks and goals of with the success and satisfaction achieved. an institution, and to maintain positive This is the repetition of the privatissimus, relations between the institution and which experience reads to everyone” the environment, thereby allowing the (Schopenhauer, 1877, S. 444 – 445)1. institution to realize its potential, achieve He does not deny the fact that health is of its goals and to adapt itself to the outer critical importance for each human being and that circumstances” (Bowman, 1997, p. 171). it is even a prerequisite for personal happiness, As the objects of strategic management we therefore we should view health as a pursuit in consider different sorts of institutions, strategic its own right. economic branches, as well as distinct functional “After all 9/10 of our happiness is based areas within institutions. solely on health. With it everything The topics of strategic management are: becomes a source of pleasure: Without 1. Problems connected to the general goals it however no good, of whatever type, is set by an institution. pleasurable and even subjective faculties, 2. Problems and decisions, which are caused the properties of the mind, the wits and the by an element of the organization, if temper are lowered and crippled by illness” this element is critical for achieving the (Schopenhauer, 1877, S. 344). goal, but is temporary not or only partly In other words, we can interpret his pessimism available. as a cautious strategic approach to life. This 3. Problems created by – non controllable - means, pessimism doesn’t deny the possibility outer circumstances. – 1292 – Alexey I. Trotsak. On a Positive Sense of Arthur Schopenhauer’s Pessimism Applied to Strategic Management The strategic analysis concerns problems mathematician Abraham Wald.
Recommended publications
  • 'The Supreme Principle of Morality'? in the Preface to His Best
    The Supreme Principle of Morality Allen W. Wood 1. What is ‘The Supreme Principle of Morality’? In the Preface to his best known work on moral philosophy, Kant states his purpose very clearly and succinctly: “The present groundwork is, however, nothing more than the search for and establishment of the supreme principle of morality, which already constitutes an enterprise whole in its aim and to be separated from every other moral investigation” (Groundwork 4:392). This paper will deal with the outcome of the first part of this task, namely, Kant’s attempt to formulate the supreme principle of morality, which is the intended outcome of the search. It will consider this formulation in light of Kant’s conception of the historical antecedents of his attempt. Our first task, however, must be to say a little about the meaning of the term ‘supreme principle of morality’. For it is not nearly as evident to many as it was to Kant that there is such a thing at all. And it is extremely common for people, whatever position they may take on this issue, to misunderstand what a ‘supreme principle of morality’ is, what it is for, and what role it is supposed to play in moral theorizing and moral reasoning. Kant never directly presents any argument that there must be such a principle, but he does articulate several considerations that would seem to justify supposing that there is. Kant holds that moral questions are to be decided by reason. Reason, according to Kant, always seeks unity under principles, and ultimately, systematic unity under the fewest possible number of principles (Pure Reason A298-302/B355-359, A645- 650/B673-678).
    [Show full text]
  • Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy) Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy Arthur Schopenhauer
    03/05/2017 Arthur Schopenhauer (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy) Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy Arthur Schopenhauer First published Mon May 12, 2003; substantive revision Sat Nov 19, 2011 Among 19th century philosophers, Arthur Schopenhauer was among the first to contend that at its core, the universe is not a rational place. Inspired by Plato and Kant, both of whom regarded the world as being more amenable to reason, Schopenhauer developed their philosophies into an instinct­recognizing and ultimately ascetic outlook, emphasizing that in the face of a world filled with endless strife, we ought to minimize our natural desires for the sake of achieving a more tranquil frame of mind and a disposition towards universal beneficence. Often considered to be a thoroughgoing pessimist, Schopenhauer in fact advocated ways — via artistic, moral and ascetic forms of awareness — to overcome a frustration­filled and fundamentally painful human condition. Since his death in 1860, his philosophy has had a special attraction for those who wonder about life's meaning, along with those engaged in music, literature, and the visual arts. 1. Life: 1788–1860 2. The Fourfold Root of the Principle of Sufficient Reason 3. Schopenhauer's Critique of Kant 4. The World as Will 5. Transcending the Human Conditions of Conflict 5.1 Aesthetic Perception as a Mode of Transcendence 5.2 Moral Awareness as a Mode of Transcendence 5.3 Asceticism and the Denial of the Will­to­Live 6. Schopenhauer's Later Works 7. Critical Reflections 8. Schopenhauer's Influence Bibliography Academic Tools Other Internet Resources Related Entries 1. Life: 1788–1860 Exactly a month younger than the English Romantic poet, Lord Byron (1788–1824), who was born on January 22, 1788, Arthur Schopenhauer came into the world on February 22, 1788 in Danzig [Gdansk, Poland] — a city that had a long history in international trade as a member of the Hanseatic League.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Beings and the Moral Law: Moral Precariousness in Kant's Ethical Philosophy
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2014 Human Beings and the Moral Law: Moral Precariousness in Kant's Ethical Philosophy Bradley Taylor University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the Philosophy Commons Recommended Citation Taylor, Bradley, "Human Beings and the Moral Law: Moral Precariousness in Kant's Ethical Philosophy" (2014). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 1468. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/1468 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/1468 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Human Beings and the Moral Law: Moral Precariousness in Kant's Ethical Philosophy Abstract ABSTRACT HUMAN BEINGS AND THE MORAL LAW: MORAL PRECARIOUSNESS IN KANT'S ETHICAL PHILOSOPHY Bradley M. Taylor Dr. Paul Guyer This dissertation is an examination of human moral precariousness in Kant's ethics. Human beings are in a state of moral precariousness insofar as they are ever-capable of transgressing the moral law and are often uncertain of the moral worth of their actions. Put another way, in this dissertation I argue that the basic relationship between human beings and the moral law, in Kant's moral philosophy, is, most fundamentally, one of tenuousness and vacillation. This relation is the fundamental characteristic of the human moral condition because such a relation is built into Kant's account of human moral agency. We have a tenuous relation to the moral law because we always have at least the possibility of conflict between our desire for happiness (i.e. the satisfaction of our inclinations) and the requirements of the moral law.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Genealogy of Morality. the Birth of Pessimism in Zapffe’S on the Tragic
    On the Genealogy of Morality... 75 ON THE GENEALOGY OF MORALITY. THE BIRTH OF PESSIMISM IN ZAPFFE’S ON THE TRAGIC SILVIYA SERAFIMOVA Institute for the Study of Societies and Knowledge, BAS [email protected] Abstract This article examines the genealogy of morality, as represented by the Norwegian philosopher and writer Peter Wessel Zapffe, as well as the way it affected the justification of his pessimism, which made him one of the most influential existentialists of the 20th century. Analyzing the complex relationships between so-called biological, social and (autotelic) metaphysical morality, which are explored against the background of four interest fronts (biological, social, autotelic and metaphysical fronts), I will clarify why Zapffe’s pessimism is irreducible to the one displayed by Schopenhauer since Zapffe provides a critical reception of Schopenhauer’s theory of tragic. Key words: Peter Wessel Zapffe, morality, existentialism, pessimism, On the Tragic Regardless of the fact that the conceptions of the Norwegian mountaineer, lawyer, writer and philosopher Peter Wessel Zapffe are not as well-known as the theories of Arne Naess, they had a significant influence on the development of Norwegian existentialism. In this context, we should specify why one should talk about Zapffe’s pessimism rather than Zapffe’s nihilism regardless of Nietzsche’s influence on his views of cultural degrowth, as well as of the possibility to draw some parallels with Nietzsche’s ‘melancholic metaphysics’ [1], as Haave suggests (Haave, 1999, pp. 236-237). Zapffe himself describes Nietzsche’s theory of tragic arguing that his “aesthetic-tragic desire” (“aestetisk-tragiske lyst”) is imprecisely interpreted (Zapffe, 1941, p.
    [Show full text]
  • Two Fundamental Problems of Ethics
    Great Clarendon Street, Oxford Ox2 6DP Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide in Oxford New York Auckland Cape Town Dar es Salaam Hong Kong Karachi Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Nairobi New Delhi Shanghai Taipei Toronto With oces in Argentina Austria Brazil Chile Czech Republic France Greece Guatemala Hungary Italy Japan Poland Portugal Singapore South Korea Switzerland Thailand Turkey Ukraine Vietnam Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries Published in the United States by Oxford University Press Inc., New York Translation, Note on the Text and Translation, Select Bibliography, Chronology, Explanatory Notes © David E. Cartwright and Edward E. Erdmann 2010 Introduction © Christopher Janaway 2010 The moral rights of the authors have been asserted Database right Oxford University Press (maker) First published as an Oxford World’s Classics paperback 2010 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted by law, or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics rights organization. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the above should be sent to the Rights Department, Oxford University Press, at the address above
    [Show full text]
  • Schopenhauer's Ethics
    Schopenhauer’s Ethics: A Metaphysics in Action Department of Education Ivan Brian L. Inductivo, M.A. Abstract: Disputations whether Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860) assent to a certain normative system of Ethics in his philosophy has been an interminable topic. Despite his dispiriting claim that philosophy can never ‘guide conduct’ as well as the determinability of character raises the question of how there exists a moral dimension in his works. Indeed, he states explicitly that his views on morality are entirely in the spirit of Christianity, as well as being consistent with the doctrines and ethical precepts of the sacred books of India (The World as Will and Representation, Section 68). Through this, by way of synoptic assessment, many works on Schopenhauer focused on compassion as the basis of his ethics. This paper will then seek to underscore a different vantage point on the grounding Inductivo... of his ethics, i.e., one which is emerging from metaphysics and achieves its embodiment in action. Hence, the principal intent of this paper is to ascertain a possible normative exposition of Schopenhauer’s moral philosophy. This entails an elucidation on whether there is a framework of Ethics embedded in his metaphysics and a critical analysis on the plausibility of this moral philosophy. Keywords: Arthur Schopenhauer, Metaphysics, Ethics, Will-to-Live, Compassion, Virtue “It is just as little necessary for the saint to be a philosopher as for the philosopher to be a saint; just as it is not necessary for a perfectly beautiful, person to be a great sculptor, or for a great sculptor to be himself a beautiful person.
    [Show full text]
  • |||GET||| Arthur Schopenhauer: the World As Will and Presentation 1St
    ARTHUR SCHOPENHAUER: THE WORLD AS WILL AND PRESENTATION 1ST EDITION DOWNLOAD FREE Arthur Schopenhauer | 9781315507880 | | | | | Schopenhauer: 'The World as Will and Representation': Volume 1 I can say this was add-on because they really don't flow with how he dealt with Christianity anywhere else within the Volume. This volume is divided into four books. Essentially all of philosophy. The book is easy to read and assimilate compared to the works of other philosophers I have read. To be blunt: I cannot recommend this work to anyone. The Will wills, and the character and motivation of the person make it possible to learn, to gain knowledge, and this might alter the way the Will objectifies itself in us. If the whole world as representation is only the visibility of the will, then art is the elucidation of this visibility, the camera obscura which shows the objects more purely, and enables us to survey and comprehend them better. The happiness that we seek is more inclined towards self preservation and satisfaction of vanity. True, compared to Kant, Schopenhauer developed a more consistent and complete philosophy. With Schop, the Will, the thing-in-itself, is in you as much as it is in anything else. More generally, although S was an atheist, there is a lot of religion in the book, more of the order of religion as philosophy. Conceived and published before the philosopher was 30 and expanded 25 years later, it is the summation of a lifetime of thought. The only hope for the individual is to save his own soul; and even this he can do only by avoiding worldly entanglements.
    [Show full text]
  • Schopenhauer on the Values of Aesthetic Experience
    Schopenhauer on the Values of Aesthetic Experience The Southern Journal of Philosophy (2007) Vol. XLV Schopenhauer on the Values of Aesthetic Experience Bart Vandenabeele Ghent University (Belgium) Abstract In this essay, I argue that Schopenhauer’s view of the aesthetic feelings of the beautiful and the sublime shows how a “dialectical” interpre- tation that homogenizes both aesthetic concepts and reduces the discrepancy between both to merely quantitative differences is flawed. My critical analysis reveals a number of important tensions in both Schopenhauer’s own aesthetic theory—which does not ultimately succeed in “merging” Plato’s and Kant’s approaches—and the interpretation that unjustly reduces the value of aesthetic experience to a merely preliminary stage of ethical will-less salvation. Art does not hurt us. The tears that we shed at a play are a type of the exquisite sterile emotions that it is the function of art to awaken. We weep, but we are not wounded. Oscar Wilde The Critic as Artist In the traditional interpretation of Schopenhauer’s aesthetic theory, the thought prevails that aesthetic pleasure is rooted in the subject’s release from the claws of the blind will and that such a (negative) feeling of relief forms a preparation to the Bart Vandenabeele is Professor of Aesthetics and Philosophy of Art at Ghent University (Belgium). He is the author and editor of several books in aesthetics, philosophy of art, and philosophy of culture. He has published several contributions in books and international journals on aesthetics, the history of philosophy, and the philosophy of language in English, German, Portuguese, and Dutch.
    [Show full text]
  • On Nietzsche's Schopenhauer, Illich's
    Fordham University Masthead Logo DigitalResearch@Fordham Articles and Chapters in Academic Book Philosophy Collections Spring 2014 “Who do you think you are?” On Nietzsche’s Schopenhauer, Illich’s Hugh of St. Victor, and Kleist’s Kant Babette Babich Fordham University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://fordham.bepress.com/phil_babich Part of the Continental Philosophy Commons, History of Philosophy Commons, and the Social and Philosophical Foundations of Education Commons Recommended Citation Babich, Babette, "“Who do you think you are?” On Nietzsche’s Schopenhauer, Illich’s Hugh of St. Victor, and Kleist’s Kant" (2014). Articles and Chapters in Academic Book Collections. 68. https://fordham.bepress.com/phil_babich/68 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Philosophy at DigitalResearch@Fordham. It has been accepted for inclusion in Articles and Chapters in Academic Book Collections by an authorized administrator of DigitalResearch@Fordham. For more information, please contact [email protected]. J P S E Journal for the Philosophical Study of Education Vol. 2 (2014) Editors: Allan Johnston, DePaul University and Columbia College Chicago Guillemette Johnston, DePaul University Outside Readers: Charles V. Blatz, University of Toledo (emeritis) Tom Falk, University of Dayton Tom Friedrich, SUNY Plattsburgh Charles Howell, Youngstown State University Emery Hyslop-Margison, Florida Atlantic University Cheu-jey Lee, Indiana University-Purdue University, Fort Wayne Alexander Makedon, Arellano University David Mosley, Bellarmine University Linda O’Neill, Northern Illinois University Sam Rocha, University of North Dakota Zachary Rohrbach, Independent Scholar Elias Schwieler, Stockholm University The Society for the Philosophical Study of Education JPSE: Journal for the Philosophical Study of Education II (2014) “Who do you think you are?” On Nietzsche’s Schopenhauer, Illich’s Hugh of St.
    [Show full text]
  • Wicks (2015), Schopenhauer (SEP).Pdf
    pdf version of the entry Arthur Schopenhauer http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2015/entries/schopenhauer/ Arthur Schopenhauer from the Spring 2015 Edition of the First published Mon May 12, 2003; substantive revision Sat Nov 19, 2011 Stanford Encyclopedia Among 19th century philosophers, Arthur Schopenhauer was among the first to contend that at its core, the universe is not a rational place. Inspired of Philosophy by Plato and Kant, both of whom regarded the world as being more amenable to reason, Schopenhauer developed their philosophies into an instinct-recognizing and ultimately ascetic outlook, emphasizing that in the face of a world filled with endless strife, we ought to minimize our natural desires for the sake of achieving a more tranquil frame of mind and Edward N. Zalta Uri Nodelman Colin Allen R. Lanier Anderson a disposition towards universal beneficence. Often considered to be a Principal Editor Senior Editor Associate Editor Faculty Sponsor thoroughgoing pessimist, Schopenhauer in fact advocated ways — via Editorial Board artistic, moral and ascetic forms of awareness — to overcome a http://plato.stanford.edu/board.html frustration-filled and fundamentally painful human condition. Since his Library of Congress Catalog Data death in 1860, his philosophy has had a special attraction for those who ISSN: 1095-5054 wonder about life's meaning, along with those engaged in music, Notice: This PDF version was distributed by request to mem- literature, and the visual arts. bers of the Friends of the SEP Society and by courtesy to SEP content contributors. It is solely for their fair use. Unauthorized 1. Life: 1788–1860 distribution is prohibited.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparison of the Works of Kant, Schopenhauer, and Nietzsche Jane Elizabeth Edwards
    University of Richmond UR Scholarship Repository Master's Theses Student Research 8-1986 A genealogy of the will : a comparison of the works of Kant, Schopenhauer, and Nietzsche Jane Elizabeth Edwards Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.richmond.edu/masters-theses Recommended Citation Edwards, Jane Elizabeth, "A genealogy of the will : a comparison of the works of Kant, Schopenhauer, and Nietzsche" (1986). Master's Theses. Paper 501. This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Research at UR Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of UR Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A GENEALOGY OF THE WILL: A COMPARISON OF THE WORKS OF KANT, SCHOPENHAUER, AND NIETZSCHE By JANE ELIZABETH EDWARDS B.A., Muskingum College, 1974. A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the University of Richmond in Candidacy for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS in History August, l986 Richmond, Virginia Abstract A Genealogy of the 14i 11 : A Comparison of the ~lo rks of Kant, Schopenhauer, and Nietzsche Author: Jane Elizabeth Edwards Thesis Director: Dr. Hugh West Degree: Master of Arts in History University of Richmond, 1986 This study investigates the development of the notion of man's will upon which Kant, Schopenhauer, and Nietzsche based their theories. Al­ though this topic had been virtually neglected in the great intellectual debates of the first to the eighteenth centuries, by the nineteenth cen­ tury the question of man 1s vii 11--i ts origin, function, and va 1 ue--domi - nated such philosophical discussions.
    [Show full text]
  • Petrarch and Schopenhauer: Elective Affinities
    Humanist Studies & the Digital Age, 1.1 (2011) ISSN: 2158-3846 (online) http://journals.oregondigital.org/hsda/ DOI: 10.5399/uo/HSDA.1.1.1191 Quanto piace al mondo è breve sogno. Petrarch and Schopenhauer: Elective Affinities Enrico Vettore, California State University, Long Beach Abstract: Art plays a fundamental role in Arthur Schopenhauer’s philosophical system, and among the many artists who Schopenhauer cites, Francis Petrarch may be considered the most significant. Schopenhauer includes Petrarch among his favorite authors, referring to him as “the poet of [his] heart” and quoting him in those parts of The World as Will and Representation and Parerga and Paralipomena that center on the topics of ethics and the art of living. In this essay, I analyze Schopenhauer’s most significant passages on Petrarch, suggest connections between those passages, and conclude that, for Schopenhauer, the Italian poet is much more than a poet; he is a true sage whose words one can turn to for comfort. Petrarch is a thinker, a promoter of solitary life and the love of knowledge, a writer of philosophy and, although only in part, even an ascetic man. From Schopenhauer’s writing, it appears that Petrarch encompasses many of the features of the ideal Schopenhauerian man: someone who understands the senselessness of life, who has succeeded in denying the Will and has been able to express it through his poetry, his philosophical writings and his life choices. Petrarch’s verses foreshadow the basic ideas of Schopenhauer’s philosophy; his actions and his example serve not only as a model and inspiration for the readers of Schopenhauer but also for the German philosopher himself.
    [Show full text]