DOCSLIB.ORG

SCDHEC 2011C. List of Impaired Waters & TMDL Program

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Page 1 of 7 South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control - www.scdhec.gov 303 (d) & Total Maximum Daily Loads South Carolina 303(d) List of Impaired Waters & TMDL Program Table of Contents: A) 303(d) List What is the 303(d) List? How is the 303(d) List developed? How can a site be removed (or “delisted”) from the 303(d) List? How can I find the current and past South Carolina’s 303(d) List? New! Click to initiate Water What is the complete list of impaired water in South Carolina? Quality Information Tool B): Total Maximum Daily Loads What is a TMDL? Tool Instructions How are TMDLs calculated? What are water quality classifications, standards and designated uses? Which waterbodies require a TMDL? How many TMDLs are currently developed? What TMDLs are currently being developed in South Carolina? How are TMDLs Implemented? How is TMDL implementation evaluated? How does a TMDL implementation plan benefit citizens? How should an NPDES permittee deal with a discharge to a waterbody for which there is a TMDL? A) 303(d) List What is the 303(d) list? The 303(d) list is the list of impaired waterbodies. All states are required to develop a list of waterbodies that do not meet water quality standards. This requirement comes from Section 303(d) of the Clean Water Act, hence the common name for the list. The waterbodies on this list do not meet water quality standards even after controls for point and nonpoint source pollution have been put in place and/or a Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) for the pollutant has not been developed. The purpose of the list is to identify impaired waters so that the source of impairment can be described and corrective actions can be implemented to improve water quality. EPA mandates that the 303(d) list of impaired waters be developed every two years and submitted to EPA for approval. South Carolina develops a 303(d) list every two years (1998, 2000, 2002, 2004, etc) for the waterbodies that fail to meet water quality standards. The most recent approved list is the 2010 303(d) list which was approved by EPA July 23, 2010. For 2010, approximately 2320 sites were assessed of which a total of 946 sites were identified as impaired with 1105 pollutants listed for impairments*. *These numbers are dynamic and are changing over time as we further improve our TMDL program and/or if http://www.scdhec.gov/environment/water/tmdl/ 11/23/2011 Page 2 of 7 a standard is attained. Back to Top How is the 303(d) List Developed? DHEC solicits and considers all existing and readily available water quality data, including non-DHEC data, in developing South Carolina’s 303(d) list. All non-DHEC data are accepted for consideration at any time during the listing cycle; however, only data submitted before September 1 of each odd-numbered year will be considered for the following year’s 303(d) list (for example, data for the 2012 list must be submitted by September 1, 2011). To be considered for the 303(d) list, data must be representative of current water quality conditions and comparable to state water quality criteria. Any organization submitting data should use laboratories certified by the DHEC Office of Environmental Laboratory Certification for the test methods of record. Persons wishing to collect water quality data for DHEC use are encouraged to contact the DHEC Office of Quality Assurance and submit a Quality Assurrance Project Plan (QAPP) for approval prior to initiating sampling. For the Department to use any non-DHEC data in development of the 303(d) list, submittal of non-DHEC data should be accompanied with a DHEC-approved QAPP. The 303(d) list is compiled using five years worth of data (e.g. for the 2010 list, data from 2004-2008 was used). An assessment methodology is developed and approved by EPA Region 4 and is used to assess data for 303(d) list development. This assessment methodology is included in the 303(d) document that is also approved by EPA Region 4. If you have data that you would like DHEC to consider in developing South Carolina’s 303(d) list, please e-mail Wade Cantrell or Matt Carswell. Additional information regarding DHEC QAPP development can be found at the following link: www.scdhec.gov/environment/envserv/qapp.htm. Back to Top How can a site be removed (or “delisted”) from the 303(d) list? Once a site has been added to the 303(d) list, there are only three ways for it to be removed or “delisted: 1. The SC water quality standard has been attained 2. A listing error has been identified 3. A TMDL has been developed and approved. TMDLs must be developed and approved by EPA for all sites listed on the 303(d) list unless they are removed for one of the two reasons above. Please note that a developed and approved TMDL may not mean that the site/station has attained SC water quality standards. Click here for more information on TMDLs (link Link to list of delisted sites from 2006-2008 Back to Top How can I find the current and past South Carolina’s 303(d) List? 2010 State of South Carolina Integrated Report Part I: Listing of Impaired Waters can be found at:: 2010 303(d) List (PDF-530KB) 2010 303(d) List (XLS-261KB) For GIS Shapefile: SCDHEC GIS Data Clearinghouse The official database for the approved 2010 303(d) list is maintained by SCDHEC Bureau of Water. SCDHEC has a priority and schedule for development of TMDLs on the 303(d) list. On the 303(d) list there is an indication for the year in which a TMDL should be developed.* * Dates of developing new TMDLs are subject to change. http://www.scdhec.gov/environment/water/tmdl/ 11/23/2011 Page 3 of 7 2010 State of South Carolina Integrated Report Part II: Assessment and Reporting can be found at: 2010 305(b) Report (PDF) Back to Top Map of 2010 303(d) listed locations by major river basins: Maps of 303(d) listed locations by major river basin: Broad River Basin - (PDF ~ 5MB) Catawba River Basin - (PDF ~ 4MB) Edisto River Basin - (PDF ~ 4.5MB) Pee Dee River Basin - (PDF ~ 6.3MB) Salkehatchie River Basin - (PDF ~ 4MB) Saluda River Basin - (PDF ~ 4.5MB) Santee River Basin - (PDF~ 4MB) New! Click to initiate Water Quality Information Tool Savannnah River Basin - (PDF ~ 4MB) Previous SC 303(d) Lists: 2008 State of South Carolina Integrated Report Part I: Listing of Impaired Tool Instructions Waters can be found at: 2008 303(d) List (PDF-341 KB) 2008 State of South Carolina Integrated Report Part II: Assessment and Reporting can be found at: 2008 305(b) Report(PDF) 2006 State of South Carolina Integrated Report Part I: Listing of Impaired Waters can be found at: 2006 303(d) List (PDF-341 KB) 2006 State of South Carolina Integrated Report Part II: Assessment and Reporting can be found at: 2006 305(b) Report(PDF) 2004 State of South Carolina Integrated Report Part I: Listing of Impaired Waters can be found at: 2004 303(d) List (PDF-341 KB) 2004 State of South Carolina Integrated Report Part II: Assessment and Reporting can be found at: 2004 305(b) Report 2002 Listing of Impaired Waters can be found at: 2002 303(d) List (PDF-463 KB) http://www.scdhec.gov/environment/water/tmdl/ 11/23/2011 Page 4 of 7 2000 Listing of Impaired Waters can be found at: 2000 303(d) List (PDF-235 KB) Supplement to the 2000 303(d) List - January 2001 (PDF-128KB) Supplement concerning Enoree River (BE-017) - October 2001 (PDF-59K) Supplement to the 2000 303(d) List - January 2002 (PDF-280KB) 1998 Listing of Impaired Waters can be found at: 1998 303(d) List Back to Top What is the complete list of impaired water in South Carolina? A complete list of sites or stations that does not meet the state’s water quality standards comprises of: 303(d) list of impaired water (2010 303(d) List) and Sites where a TMDL is developed and water quality standard are not attained (Sites Covered Under an Approved TMDL and Corresponding Water Quality Attainment Status) Back to Top B): Total Maximum Daily Loads What is a TMDL? A TMDL, or Total Maximum Daily Load, is the amount of a single pollutant (such as bacteria, nutrients, metals) that can enter a waterbody on daily basis and still meet water quality standards set fort by the State. “TMDL” refers to both a calculation of a pollutant entering a waterbody as well as a document which includes this calculation along with a source assessments, watershed and land use information, reductions and allocations information, implementation and other relevant information, maps, figures, and pictures. TMDLs are a requirement found in Section 303(d), of the Clean Water Act. Once a site is included on the 303(d) list of impaired waters, a TMDL must be developed within two to thirteen years of initial listing. In South Carolina, TMDLs are developed and proposed by SCDHEC and then forwarded to EPA Region 4 for final approval. TMDLs are calculated by adding all the point and nonpoint sources for the pollutant causing the impairment. After a TMDL is calculated, the amount of load entering from point and nonpoint sources is compared to the water quality standards for that waterbody. Then this total loading is reduced to the levels where the water quality standards can be met.
Recommended publications
  • Downtown Greenville Master Plan Greenville, South Carolina

    Downtown Greenville Master Plan Greenville, South Carolina

    Downtown Greenville Master Plan Greenville, South Carolina June 2008 Sasaki Associates, Inc. W-ZHA CGD Table of Contents Executive Summary 1 Greenville Today 11 Positioning Greenville 17 Master Planning Principles 27 Five Corners 33 Making Connections 47 Implementation Strategy 59 Acknowledgments 84 Executive Summary 01 CHAPTERCHAPTER Executive Summary The City of Greenville has undertaken this current master plan as a way to look forward and ensure the success of downtown for the next twenty years. In each decade, Greenville has stepped ahead of other cities, acting boldly to reinvent and strengthen the downtown. This proactive approach has served the City well, making Greenville a model for other cities to emulate. As the City well realizes, the work of building and sustaining downtowns is an ongoing endeavor. In this light, the City of Greenville has undertaken this current master plan as a way to look forward and ensure the success of downtown for the next twenty years. The plan faces the realities of downtown today, building on its strengths and confronting issues Figure 1.1. The downtown Greenville Skyline. that must be addressed to move forward. The goals of this master plan are to: . Create a framework for future development downtown . Reinforce the role of downtown as an economic catalyst for the region . Leverage prior successes to move to the next level 4. Create a fully functional mixed use, sustainable, urban environment. Main Street is understood to be the center of downtown but the definition of the outer boundaries varies, especially as Main Street has been extended (Figure .). For the purposes of this study, the downtown area is defined by the Stone Avenue corridor on the north, the Butler Street Corridor on the west, the Church Street corridor on the east and University Ridge and the Stadium on the south.
  • A Water Quality Trading Framework for the Reedy River

    A Water Quality Trading Framework for the Reedy River

    A WATER QUALITY TRADING FRAMEWORK FOR THE REEDY RIVER Gregory Michael Mikota II AUTHORS: Reedy River Watershed Policy Director Strom Thurmond Institute of Government & Public Affairs Perimeter Road Clemson, SC 29634-0125 REFERENCE: Proceedings of the 2008 South Carolina Water Resources Conference, held October 14-15, 2008, at the Charleston Area Event Center Abstract. The Reedy River flows through a relatively quality trading can provide greater flexibility and the small watershed that is rapidly experiencing growth. The potential to achieve levels of environmental benefits that watershed is approximately 167,000 acres, but the upper would not otherwise be attained under a traditional portions of the river include the urban areas of the City of command and control approach. When working with Greenville, Mauldin, and Simpsonville within Greenville non-point source pollution problems, the USEPA is County, South Carolina. The lower portions of the river required to work with individual states and local agencies flow through Laurens County as the Reedy joins the because of the provisions defined in the revision of the Saluda River to form Lake Greenwood. As the Clean Water Act in 1987. population and the economy of the Reedy River From a state and local level further analysis is needed Watershed continue to expand, the demand on this river in order to asses the applicability of creating a water resource will continue to increase. quality trading program for the Reedy River Watershed. For a number of years the Reedy River has been under This proposed paper will provide a conceptual increasing pressure from various sources. Point source framework for how a water quality trading program may and non-point source effluent loads have increased be established within this watershed.
  • Class G Tables of Geographic Cutter Numbers: Maps -- by Region Or

    Class G Tables of Geographic Cutter Numbers: Maps -- by Region Or

    G3862 SOUTHERN STATES. REGIONS, NATURAL G3862 FEATURES, ETC. .C55 Clayton Aquifer .C6 Coasts .E8 Eutaw Aquifer .G8 Gulf Intracoastal Waterway .L6 Louisville and Nashville Railroad 525 G3867 SOUTHEASTERN STATES. REGIONS, NATURAL G3867 FEATURES, ETC. .C5 Chattahoochee River .C8 Cumberland Gap National Historical Park .C85 Cumberland Mountains .F55 Floridan Aquifer .G8 Gulf Islands National Seashore .H5 Hiwassee River .J4 Jefferson National Forest .L5 Little Tennessee River .O8 Overmountain Victory National Historic Trail 526 G3872 SOUTHEAST ATLANTIC STATES. REGIONS, G3872 NATURAL FEATURES, ETC. .B6 Blue Ridge Mountains .C5 Chattooga River .C52 Chattooga River [wild & scenic river] .C6 Coasts .E4 Ellicott Rock Wilderness Area .N4 New River .S3 Sandhills 527 G3882 VIRGINIA. REGIONS, NATURAL FEATURES, ETC. G3882 .A3 Accotink, Lake .A43 Alexanders Island .A44 Alexandria Canal .A46 Amelia Wildlife Management Area .A5 Anna, Lake .A62 Appomattox River .A64 Arlington Boulevard .A66 Arlington Estate .A68 Arlington House, the Robert E. Lee Memorial .A7 Arlington National Cemetery .A8 Ash-Lawn Highland .A85 Assawoman Island .A89 Asylum Creek .B3 Back Bay [VA & NC] .B33 Back Bay National Wildlife Refuge .B35 Baker Island .B37 Barbours Creek Wilderness .B38 Barboursville Basin [geologic basin] .B39 Barcroft, Lake .B395 Battery Cove .B4 Beach Creek .B43 Bear Creek Lake State Park .B44 Beech Forest .B454 Belle Isle [Lancaster County] .B455 Belle Isle [Richmond] .B458 Berkeley Island .B46 Berkeley Plantation .B53 Big Bethel Reservoir .B542 Big Island [Amherst County] .B543 Big Island [Bedford County] .B544 Big Island [Fluvanna County] .B545 Big Island [Gloucester County] .B547 Big Island [New Kent County] .B548 Big Island [Virginia Beach] .B55 Blackwater River .B56 Bluestone River [VA & WV] .B57 Bolling Island .B6 Booker T.
  • Board Meeting Agenda and Materials and Monthly Division Reports

    Board Meeting Agenda and Materials and Monthly Division Reports

    South Carolina Department of Natural Resources Board Meeting Agenda and Materials and Monthly Division Reports Board Meeting Scheduled for Videoconference https://scdnr2.webex.com/scdnr2/j.php?MTID=mb786d66feafef8aa7e4e0a0438488318 Meeting number (access code): 132 319 2411 Telephone: 1-844-992-4726 Access Code: 132 319 2411## March 18, 2021 10:00 AM Quick Tips and Logistics WebEx Video Conferencing Quick Tips Once you are logged into the WebEx meeting room this is the first screen you will see. Select “Start Meeting” Select “Mute” to eliminate all background noise. To see all the members in attendance you can select “Participants”. Select “chat” so that the host is always able to communicate with you. In the event of technical issues, the host will call you directly to assist you further. Agenda AGENDA SC DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES BOARD Virtual Meeting March 18, 2021 10:00 AM https://scdnr2.webex.com/scdnr2/j.php?MTID=mb786d66feafef8aa7e4e0a0438488318 Meeting number (access code): 132 319 2411 Telephone: 1-844-992-4726 Access Code: 132 319 2411## I. Call to Order ............................................................. Norman Pulliam, Chairman, SC DNR Board II. Videoconference Guidelines .............................................................. Valerie Shannon, Facilitator III. Invocation IV. Pledge of Allegiance............................................ Mike Hutchins, Vice Chairman, SC DNR Board V. Chairman’s Comments VI. Introduction of Guests ............ Emily Cope, Deputy Director for Wildlife and Freshwater Fisheries VII. Constituent Comments (Comments are limited to 5 minutes) ..................................... Emily Cope VIII. Approval of Minutes from February 18, 2021 meeting IX. Presentations/Commendations X. Advisory Committee Reports A. Governor’s Cup Billfishing Series ........................ Carlisle Oxner, DNR Board Representative B. Wildlife and Freshwater Fisheries .................................................... Mike Hutchins, Chairman XI.
  • Technical Memorandum

    Technical Memorandum

    Technical Memorandum To: South Carolina Department of Natural Resources (DNR) South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control (DHEC) From: CDM Smith Date: January 2015 Subject: Methodology for Unimpaired Flow Development Saluda River Basin, South Carolina (Prepared as part of the South Carolina Surface Water Quantity Modeling Program) 1.0 Background and Objectives for Unimpaired Flows Unimpaired Flow (UIF) describes the natural hydrology of a river basin. UIFs quantify streamflows throughout a river basin in the absence of human intervention in the river channel, such as storage, withdrawals, discharges, and return flows. From this basis, modeling and decision making can be compared with pristine conditions. This memorandum explains the methods that will be employed to develop UIFs for South Carolina’s Saluda River basin. It describes data needs, methods for filling data gaps, and issues specific to the Saluda River basin. Once developed, UIFs will be input to the Simplified Water Allocation Model (SWAM) to evaluate surface water hydrology and operations throughout the basin. The UIFs for the Saluda Basin will extend from 1925-2013. UIFs will serve two purposes: ° UIFs will be the fundamental input to the model at headwater nodes and tributary nodes upstream of historic management activity, representing naturally occurring water in the riverways. Current and future management practices such as storage, withdrawals, and discharges will be superimposed on the UIFs. ° UIFs will provide a comparative basis for model results. The impacts of current and future management practices on flow throughout the river network can be compared to the natural conditions represented by the UIFs, and decisions about relative impacts can be well informed.
  • Classification

    Classification

    Form No. 10-300 U IM 1 t-U c> l /\ l to UE,r/\R i wnrN i vr i nc, ii> i niviwiv NATIONAL PARK SERVICE NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES ?7 INVENTORY « NOMINATION FORM £X A SEE INSTRUCTIONS IN HOWTO COMPLETE NATIONAL REGISTER FOftMS _____TYPE ALL ENTRIES - COMPLETE APPLICABLE SECTIONS_____________ | NAME HISTORIC Vardry Park; Reedy River Park, Furman University Botanical Garden and Arboretum AND/OR COMMON Reedy River Falls Historic Park and Greenway (preferred)_______________ LOCATION STREET&NUMBER Both banks of the Reedy River from the falls downstream to Church Street _NOT FOR PUBLICATION CITY. TOWN CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT Greenville __ VICINITY OF # 4 STATE CODE COUNTY CODE South Carolina 045 Greenville 045 CLASSIFICATION CATEGORY OWNERSHIP STATUS PRESENT USE —DISTRICT -PUBLIC JiOCCUPIED _AGRICULTURE —MUSEUM _BUILDING(S) -PRIVATE —UNOCCUPIED —COMMERCIAL .K-PARK —STRUCTURE -BOTH —AWORKIN PROGRESS —EDUCATIONAL —PRIVATE RESIDENCE ASITE PUBLIC ACQUISITION ACCESSIBLE _ENTERTAINMENT _RELIGIOUS —OBJECT JN PROCESS —YES: RESTRICTED —GOVERNMENT —SCIENTIFIC -BEING CONSIDERED —YES: UNRESTRICTED —INDUSTRIAL —TRANSPORTATION _NO —MILITARY —OTHER: OWNER OF PROPERTY NAME City of Greenville_____ STREET & NUMBER Main Street, Post Office Box 2207 CITY, TOWN STATE Greenville VICINITY OF South Carolina LOCATION OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION COURTHOUSE, REG.STRY OF DEEDS,ETC. STREET & NUMBER East North Street CITY, TOWN STATE Greenville South Carolina REPRESENTATION IN EXISTING SURVEYS TITLE Inventory of Historic Places in South Carolina DATE 1973 (update) — FEDERAL JlSTATE _ COUNTY _ LOCAL DEPOSITORY FOR SURVEY RECORDS S.C. Department of Archives and Historv CITY, TOWN STATE Columbia South Carolina DESCRIPTION CONDITION CHECK ONE CHECK ONE _ EXCELLENT _ DETERIORATED _UNALTERED -XoRIGINALSITE X_GOOD _XRUINS FALTERED MOVED DATE .
  • Appendix F Biological Assessment of Threatened and Endangered Species

    Appendix F Biological Assessment of Threatened and Endangered Species

    EDISTO BEACH COASTAL STORM DAMAGE REDUCTION GENERAL INVESTIGATION STUDY APPENDIX F BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT COASTAL STORM DAMAGE REDUCTION GENERAL INVESTIGATION STUDY EDISTO BEACH, COLLETON COUNTY SOUTH CAROLINA January 2014 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION Edisto Beach is a barrier island located at the mouth of the Edisto River in Colleton and Charleston Counties, South Carolina, approximately 45 miles southwest of Charleston, South Carolina and approximately 20 miles east-northeast of Beaufort, South Carolina (see Figure 1). The incorporated Town of Edisto Beach is located on the island, as is Edisto Beach State Park. The specific study area (See Figure 2) includes Edisto Beach, two Coastal Barrier Resources Act (CBRA) zones (the Edisto Complex (Unit M09) to the northeast and Otter Island (Unit M10) to the southwest), and the coastal Atlantic Ocean waters where offshore borrow investigations will be conducted and potential borrow areas will be identified and located. The Town of Edisto Beach and Edisto Beach State Park are part of Edisto Island. They are separated from the main body of Edisto Island by Big Bay Creek, Scott Creek, and the associated salt marsh to the northwest and Jeremy Inlet to the northeast. The Town of Edisto Beach and Edisto Beach State Park are also bounded by the South Edisto River and St. Helena Sound to the southwest and the Atlantic Ocean to the southeast. The maximum width at the southern end of this portion of Edisto Island is approximately 1.5 miles, while the northern end is much narrower. The Town of Edisto Beach occupies the central and southern portions of the island and is generally separated from Edisto Beach State Park by State Highway 174, which provides the only access to the island.
  • UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION 4 ATLANTA FEDERAL CENTER 61 FORSYTH STREET ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303-8960 Janu

    UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION 4 ATLANTA FEDERAL CENTER 61 FORSYTH STREET ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303-8960 Janu

    UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION 4 ATLANTA FEDERAL CENTER 61 FORSYTH STREET ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303-8960 January 24, 2002 Mr. Alton C. Boozer, Chief Bureau of Water South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control 2600 Bull Street Columbia, South Carolina 29201-1708 SUBJECT: Intention to Delist Pollutants from 2000 § 303(d) List Dear Mr. Boozer: This is to acknowledge receipt of your December 17, 2001 request that the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) review proposed § 303(d) list modifications that are intended by the State of South Carolina. EPA Region 4 has completed its review of the provided information and offers the following findings of its review. As you are aware, 40 Code of Federal Regulations (C.F.R.) § 130.7(b)(1) requires the State to identify water quality limited segments still requiring total maximum daily loads (TMDLs), i.e., the § 303(d) list. Title 40 C.F.R. § 130.7(b)(4) requires the identification of pollutants causing or expected to cause violations of the applicable water quality standards. Title 40 C.F.R. § 130.7(b)(6)(iv) allows the State to not include a water on the § 303(d) list if good cause for that decision can be demonstrated. Good cause includes, but is not limited to, more recent or accurate data; more sophisticated water quality modeling; flaws in the original analysis that led to the water being listed; or changes in conditions, e.g., new control equipment or elimination of discharges. The South Carolina Bureau of Water (the Bureau) intends to delist
  • From Rice Fields to Duck Marshes: Sport Hunters and Environmental Change on the South Carolina Coast, 1890–1950 Matthew Allen Lockhart University of South Carolina

    From Rice Fields to Duck Marshes: Sport Hunters and Environmental Change on the South Carolina Coast, 1890–1950 Matthew Allen Lockhart University of South Carolina

    University of South Carolina Scholar Commons Theses and Dissertations 2017 From Rice Fields to Duck Marshes: Sport Hunters and Environmental Change on the South Carolina Coast, 1890–1950 Matthew Allen Lockhart University of South Carolina Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Lockhart, M. A.(2017). From Rice Fields to Duck Marshes: Sport Hunters and Environmental Change on the South Carolina Coast, 1890–1950. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd/4161 This Open Access Dissertation is brought to you by Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FROM RICE FIELDS TO DUCK MARSHES: SPORT HUNTERS AND ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE ON THE SOUTH CAROLINA COAST, 1890–1950 by Matthew Allen Lockhart Bachelor of Arts Wofford College, 1998 Master of Arts University of South Carolina, 2001 Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History College of Arts and Sciences University of South Carolina 2017 Accepted by: Robert R. Weyeneth, Major Professor Janet G. Hudson, Committee Member Kendrick A. Clements, Committee Member Daniel J. Vivian, Committee Member Cheryl L. Addy, Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School © Copyright by Matthew Allen Lockhart, 2017 All Rights Reserved. ii DEDICATION In memory of my brother Marc D. Lockhart, who began this journey with me iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First, I want acknowledge with gratitude my splendid dissertation committee. Getting to this point would not have been possible without my director, Robert R.
  • The Reedy River Blueway

    The Reedy River Blueway

    82°27'0"W 82°25'30"W 82°24'0"W 82°22'30"W 82°21'0"W 82°19'30"W 82°18'0"W 82°16'30"W . d e t o n e s i w r e h t o s s e l n u XW , f f a t s r e v e r o F e t a t s p U y b d e d i v o r p y l d n i k s e r u t c i P N Little Low I Brother . r e p a p f o o r p r e t a w n o d e t n i r p s a w p a m s i h T City A Head Cleveland Park M (Class IV) reek 5 . d e v r e s e r s t h g i r l l A . r e v e r o F e t a t s p U y b d e n g i s e d p a M S T Dam z 160 Lakehurst Street, Greenville, SC 29607 Rocky C E-8 of S TAT . n o i t a d n u o F y e n i a R n h o J d n a e i l l a C e h t f o t r o p p u s Open from 8 AM to 9 PM, this 124.3-acre park RS Reedy River EK E s u o r e n e g e h t y b e l b i s s o p e d a m s a w p a m s i h T featuring the Reedy River offers a myriad of E T k R N Green- Mile 60 jF Cleveland C I k recreation opportunities, including access to the D AN N L " ville GHS Swamp Rabbit Trail, fitness features, picnic Park CH I 0 k IN R n ' 9 _ shelters, playgrounds, tennis courts, and sports GHS L 2 r T 1 D E Swamp d fields.
  • Things to See and Do in the Saluda-Reedy Watershed

    Things to See and Do in the Saluda-Reedy Watershed

    Things to See and Do in the Saluda-Reedy Watershed 1 Saluda Reservoir 2 Jones Gap State Park 8 Piedmont Mill and Dam 9 Cedar Falls As part of the Greenville Water System, this 547 Here the Middle Saluda River flows from its headwaters down Native Americans called this place “Big Shoals In earlier years, these picturesque falls on the acre lake on the North Saluda River provides many this 2,000 acre valley in the northern Greenville County mountains. of the Saluda,” and settlers later named it Reedy River were an important commercial asset Greenville County residents with fresh, clean Some 400 species of plants call the park home, including a number Garrison Shoals and finally Piedmont. Henry to the region. This was the site of a grist mill, drinking water. of rare and endangered species. The Park offers a learning center, Pinckney Hammond built the first cotton mill saw mill, dam and power generating plant that natural camp sites and a paradise for trout anglers. on the Saluda River here in 1848. provided operating power for the textile mill at Fork Shoals. Now the falls is one of the most beautiful natural features on the lower Reedy. 3 Table Rock Reservoir This lake on the South Saluda River was built in 1925 to provide drinking 10 Pelzer Mill and Dam 11 Tumblin Shoals water to the Greenville Water System. Its protected watershed is an ecological treasure, with remnant old-growth forest and large populations of species In 1880 Ellison Adger Smyth and Francis J. In the 1830s, a store, ginnery, saw mill and flour that are rare elsewhere.
  • US Environmental Protection Agency Region 4

    US Environmental Protection Agency Region 4

    UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION 4 ATLANTA FEDERAL CENTER 61 FORSYTH STREET ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303-8960 David Wilson Chief South Carolina Department of Environmental Control Bureau of Water 2600 Bull Street Columbia, SC 29201 SUBJ: Approval of the State of South Carolina's 2008 303( d) List Submittal Dear Mr. Wilson: The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Region 4, has completed its review of the South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control's Final 2008 Clean Water Act (CWA) Section 303(d) list of water quality limited segments. EPA has determined that each of the water quality limited segments still requiring Total Maximum Daily Loads identified on the State's 2008 list meets the requirements of the CWA Section 303( d) and its implementing regulations, 40 CFR 130.7. EPA hereby approves the State of South Carolina's decision to include each of the waters designated by the State in its 2008 303( d) list. Enclosed for your information is the accompanying decision document for this approval action. Appendix C of the enclosed decision document contains 23 waters of concern for which EPA is not acting on at this time. These waters were submitted based on a preliminary assessment method that has recently been modified in the State's monitoring program so that more representative data can be obtained. Listing determinations for these waters should be included in the 2010 303(d) list submittal. If you have questions concerning this matter, please feel free to contact me at (404) 562-9345 or Annie Godfrey, Chief, East Standards, Monitoring, and TMDL Section at (404) 562-9967.