TTC Family of Services Routes with Shared Wheel-Trans Stops
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Service Changes Effective Sunday, June 21, 2015 Route Period Veh Veh Old New Old New Old New 1 Yonge-University PM Peak 2'31&Quo
Service Changes Effective Sunday, June 21, 2015 Route Period Headway Veh Headway Veh Headway Veh Old New Old New Old New M-F Saturday Sunday 1 Yonge-University PM Peak 2'31" 2'40" -3 Seasonal reduction 2 Bloor-Danforth AM Peak 2'21" 2'31" -3 Seasonal reduction PM Peak 2'31" 2'51" -5 192 Airport Rocket Pan-Am Games service M-F AM Peak, Midday & PM Peak 8'30" 7' 1 Morning 10' 8' 1 10' 8' 1 Afternoon 8' 7'30" 1 8' 7'30" 1 Early Evening 9' 7'30" 1 10' 8' 1 10' 8' 1 Late Evening 10' 8' 1 10' 8' 1 10' 8' 1 117 Alness AM Peak 10' 13'30" -1 Seasonal reduction PM Peak 12' 16' -1 61 Avenue Road North AM Peak 10' 12' -1 7 Bathurst AM Peak 9'10" 9'45" -1 Seasonal reduction PM Peak 7'45" 8'15" -1 Late evening 12' 10' 2 Ten Minute Network 511 Bathurst Late Evening 8' 6' 3 6' 1 Seasonal change 11 Bayview AM Peak 6' 6'23" -2 Seasonal change 11A to Steeles 12' 12'45" 11A Tripper 1 0 -1 11B to Sunnybrook 12' 12'45" PM Peak 6' 7'30" -2 11A to Steeles 12' 15' 11B to Sunnybrook 12' 15' 9 Bellamy AM Peak 15' 18' -1 Seasonal change PM Peak 15' 19' -1 17 Birchmount AM Peak / Weekend Morning 6'30" 7' Seasonal cut & construction effects 17A Warden Stn - 14th Ave 19'30" 21' 17B Warden Stn - Passmore 6'30" 7' 17C to Steeles 15' 14'30" 1 24' 20'30" 1 Midday / Weekend Afternoon 17C to Steeles 13' 13' 1 15' 14'30" 1 18' 17' 1 PM Peak 8' 9' 17A Warden Stn - 14th Ave 24' 27' 17B Warden Stn - Passmore 8' 9' Early Evening 17C to Steeles 12' 12' 1 22' 18' 1 22' 24' 1 50 Burnhamthorpe AM Peak 10' 13'30" -1 Seasonal change 506 Carlton AM Peak 3'45" 4' -2 Seasonal change PM -
Attachment 4 – Assessment of Ontario Line
EX9.1 Attachment 4 – Assessment of Ontario Line As directed by City Council in April 2019, City and TTC staff have assessed the Province’s proposed Ontario Line. The details of this assessment are provided in this attachment. 1. Project Summary 1.1. Project Description The Ontario Line was included as part of the 2019 Ontario Budget1 as a transit project that will cover similar study areas as the Relief Line South and North, as well as a western extension. The proposed project is a 15.5-kilometre higher-order transit line with 15 stations, connecting from Exhibition GO station to Line 5 at Don Mills Road and Eglinton Avenue East, near the Science Centre station, as shown in Figure 1. Figure 1. Ontario Line Proposal (source: Metrolinx IBC) Since April 2019, technical working groups comprising staff from the City, TTC, Metrolinx, Infrastructure Ontario and the Ministry of Transportation met regularly to understand alignment and station location options being considered for the Ontario 1 http://budget.ontario.ca/2019/contents.html Attachment 4 - Assessment of Ontario Line Page 1 of 20 Line. Discussions also considered fleet requirements, infrastructure design criteria, and travel demand modelling. Metrolinx prepared an Initial Business Case (IBC) that was publicly posted on July 25, 2019.2 The IBC compared the Ontario Line and Relief Line South projects against a Business As Usual scenario. The general findings by Metrolinx were that "both Relief Line South and Ontario Line offer significant improvements compared to a Business As Usual scenario, generating $3.4 billion and $7.4 billion worth of economic benefits, respectively. -
Appendix C3. Public Engagement Record: December 2019
Appendix C3 Public Engagement Record: December 10, 2019 to September 16, 2020 Public Engagement Record: December 10, 2019 to September 16, 2020 • Website Screenshots Public Engagement Record: December 10, 2019 to September 16, 2020 • Ask-A-Question Submissions Ask A Question – January 23 to September 16, 2020 Comment title Comment body Response Future Is the western terminus of the line to be built so that it would be able to be We are currently advancing plans for the line between Exhibition/Ontario expansion extended north west at a later date? Thank you Place and the Ontario Science Centre. However, these plans don’t preclude future expansions that may be presented to improve access and meet demand. Thorncliffe Park Where is the station in relation to Overlea Blvd Teams are analyzing the 15 stations identified in the Initial Business Case to Station determine whether or not they should be built, looking at factors like the potential number of users, ease of construction, and cost, to name a few. Findings will be presented in the Preliminary Design Business Case, which we are aiming to complete by summer 2020.By using the GO corridor and building bridges across the Don River instead of tunneling underneath it, a route that is approximately twice the length of the Relief Line South can be built at a similar cost. Also, using the GO corridor will allow people to more easily connect between GO and TTC services that will both be accessible by street level, saving time compared to connections that would lead people into deep underground stations. -
Rapid Transit in Toronto Levyrapidtransit.Ca TABLE of CONTENTS
The Neptis Foundation has collaborated with Edward J. Levy to publish this history of rapid transit proposals for the City of Toronto. Given Neptis’s focus on regional issues, we have supported Levy’s work because it demon- strates clearly that regional rapid transit cannot function eff ectively without a well-designed network at the core of the region. Toronto does not yet have such a network, as you will discover through the maps and historical photographs in this interactive web-book. We hope the material will contribute to ongoing debates on the need to create such a network. This web-book would not been produced without the vital eff orts of Philippa Campsie and Brent Gilliard, who have worked with Mr. Levy over two years to organize, edit, and present the volumes of text and illustrations. 1 Rapid Transit in Toronto levyrapidtransit.ca TABLE OF CONTENTS 6 INTRODUCTION 7 About this Book 9 Edward J. Levy 11 A Note from the Neptis Foundation 13 Author’s Note 16 Author’s Guiding Principle: The Need for a Network 18 Executive Summary 24 PART ONE: EARLY PLANNING FOR RAPID TRANSIT 1909 – 1945 CHAPTER 1: THE BEGINNING OF RAPID TRANSIT PLANNING IN TORONTO 25 1.0 Summary 26 1.1 The Story Begins 29 1.2 The First Subway Proposal 32 1.3 The Jacobs & Davies Report: Prescient but Premature 34 1.4 Putting the Proposal in Context CHAPTER 2: “The Rapid Transit System of the Future” and a Look Ahead, 1911 – 1913 36 2.0 Summary 37 2.1 The Evolving Vision, 1911 40 2.2 The Arnold Report: The Subway Alternative, 1912 44 2.3 Crossing the Valley CHAPTER 3: R.C. -
Bus Bridging Decision-Support Toolkit: Optimization Framework and Policy Analysis
Bus Bridging Decision-Support Toolkit: Optimization Framework and Policy Analysis by Alaa Itani A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Master of Applied Science Department of Civil and Mineral Engineering University of Toronto © Copyright by Alaa Itani 2019 Bus Bridging Decision-Support Toolkit: Optimization Framework and Policy Analysis Alaa Itani Master of Applied Science Department of Civil and Mineral Engineering University of Toronto 2019 Abstract Bus Bridging is the strategy most commonly applied in responding to rail service interruptions in North America and Europe. In determining the required number of buses and source routes, most transit agencies rely on ad-hoc approaches based on operational experience and constraints, which can lead to extensive delays and queue build-ups at affected stations. This thesis developed an optimization model, to determine the optimal number of shuttle buses and route allocation which minimize the overall subway and bus riders delay. The generated optimal solutions are sensitive to bus bay capacity constraints along the shuttle service corridor. The optimization model is integrated with a previously developed simulation tool that tracks the evolution of system queues and delays throughout the bus bridging process. A set of bus bridging policy guidelines were developed based on further analysis of the optimization model outputs using a Classification and Regression Tree (CART) model. ii Acknowledgments First, I would like to thank my parents and for their continuous support and trust in my abilities. Although they were thousands of miles away, they were always supportive, I couldn’t have made it here without their presence. -
ROUTE: 35 - JANE SERVICE: SATURDAY SCHEDULE NO: PAGE: 1 TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION DIVISION: ARRW REPLACES NO: EFFECTIVE: Jan 9, 2021
ROUTE: 35 - JANE SERVICE: SATURDAY SCHEDULE NO: PAGE: 1 TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION DIVISION: ARRW REPLACES NO: EFFECTIVE: Jan 9, 2021 SERVICE PLANNING-RUN GUIDE SAFE OPERATION TAKES PRECEDENCE OVER TIMES SHOWN ON THIS SCHEDULE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DOWN FROM: -- PIONEER VILLAGE STATION MU MURRAY ROSS PKWY & STEELES AVE.W JS JANE ST. & STEELES AVE. W. SJ SHOREHAM DR. & JANE ST. FJ FINCH AVE. W. & JANE ST. SH SHEPPARD AVE. W. & JANE ST. LW LAWRENCE AVE. W. & JANE ST. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- UP FROM: -- JANE STATION LW LAWRENCE AVE. W. & JANE ST. JA JANE ST. & WILSON AVE. SH SHEPPARD AVE. W. & JANE ST. FJ FINCH AVE. W. & JANE ST. SJ SHOREHAM DR. & JANE ST. PK PETER KAISER GT. & STEELES AVE.W JS JANE ST. & STEELES AVE. W. MU MURRAY ROSS PKWY & STEELES AVE.W ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- RUN | | | | | 4| 3| 4| 8| 5| 2| 2| 2| 6| 10| 2| @ |IM* 2|IM |AR | |TOTAL |DOWN | | | 427a| 555a| 728a| 859a|1039a|1231p| 231p| 431p| 631p| 817p|1006p|1140p| 112x| 119x| 248x| 302x| | 80 | UP | 414a| 424a| 512a| 646a| 816a| 947a|1137a| 135p| 335p| 535p| 725p| 910p|1056p|1230x| | 206x| | | |22:48 | |AR |PK | 2| 7| 4| 4| 6| 9| 9| 9| 2| 5| 7| 7| |JN 2| | | | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -
Mobility Hubs December 2008
Mobility Hubs December 2008 1. Introduction This is one in a series of backgrounders that have been produced by Metrolinx to provide further explanation and clarification on the policies and directions of the Regional Transportation Plan (RTP). The RTP is available for downloading at www.metrolinx.com. This backgrounder should be read as an accompaniment to Strategy 7 of the RTP. It is intended to provide additional detail on the mobility hub policies of the RTP and clarification of the terms and definitions used in the RTP with respect to mobility hubs. Metrolinx wishes to acknowledge the invaluable contribution of Urban Strategies Inc. and IBI Group to the preparation of this backgrounder. 2. What is a Mobility Hub? The mobility hub policies of the RTP build on the overall policy framework established in the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe, particularly those related to major transit station areas. The Growth Plan defines major transit station areas as the area within a 500m radius (10 minute walk) of any existing or planned higher order transit station within a settlement area or around a major bus depot in an urban core. Major transit station areas that are particularly significant for the regional rapid transit system are recognized as mobility hubs in the RTP. Mobility hubs are major transit station areas with significant levels of transit service planned for them in the RTP, high development potential, and a critical function in the regional transportation system as major trip generators. They are places of connectivity where different modes of transportation — from walking to high- speed rail — come together seamlessly and where there is an intensive concentration of employment, living, shopping and/or recreation. -
Service Improvements for 2002
SERVICE IMPROVEMENTS FOR 2002 Subway Streetcars Buses RT October 2001 Service Improvements for 2002 - 2 - Table of contents Table of contents Summary................................................................................................................................................................4 Recommendations ..............................................................................................................................................5 1. Planning transit service ...............................................................................................................................6 2. Recommended new and revised services for the Sheppard Subway .......................................10 Sheppard Subway.................................................................................................................................................................................10 11 BAYVIEW – Service to Bayview Station...........................................................................................................................................10 25 DON MILLS – Service to Don Mills Station ....................................................................................................................................11 Don Mills/Scarborough Centre – New limited-stop rocket route ....................................................................................................11 Finch East – Service to Don Mills Station...........................................................................................................................................11 -
3080 Yonge Street TORONTO, ONTARIO
3080 Yonge Street TORONTO, ONTARIO Office Availabilities SPACE ADDITIONAL RENT (SQ FT.) AVAILABILITY/COMMENTS suite 1009: 12,652 sq. ft. $29.34 Immediately Available - Ground floor retail suite 1010: 2,792 sq. ft. $29.34 Immediately Available - Ground floor retail suite 3032/3034: 4,012 sq. ft. $18.82 Can be demised into 2,162 sq. ft. or 1,850 sq. ft. suite 4000: 15,467 sq. ft. $18.82 Immediately Available - Built out suite 4065: 1,200 sq. ft. $18.82 Immediately Available - Built out suite 4076: 1,918 sq. ft. $18.82 Immediately Available - Built out suite 6000: 3,551 sq. ft. $18.82 Immediately Available - Built out PLEASE CONTACT LISTING AGENTS FOR NET RENT BRENDAN J. SULLIVAN* MYAH OLLEK CBRE Limited, Real Estate Brokerage Vice President Sales Representative 145 King Street West, Suite 1100 416 847 3262 416 815 2353 Toronto, ON, M5H 1J8 [email protected] [email protected] 416 362 2244 www.cbre.com *Sales Representative // 3080 Yonge Street // Toronto, On About the Building & Area 401 RANEE AVENUE LAWRENCE STATION A L L SHEPPARD W STATIONE N R LAWRENCE AVENUE WEST O A BAYVIEW AVENUE D BLYTHWOOD ROAD MT. PLEASANT ROAD D YONGE STREET U GLENCAIRN AVENUE P LAWRENCE W STATION L E X AVENUE ROAD A V MARLEE AVENUE BATHURST STREET E DUFFERIN STREET N U E A GLENCAIRN STATIONL L E N R O EGLINTON STATION A D CHAPLIN CRESCENT EGLINTON AVENUE WEST DAVISVILLE ROAD CASTLEFIELD ROAD GLENCAIRN STATION OAKWOOD AVENUE O DAVISVILLE STATION R I O L E P VEHICLES PER DAY SUBWAY RIDERSHIP AVERAGE HOUSEHOLDA INCOME POPULATION R K W 39,825 $224,159A 373,866 25,590 Y LAWRENCE YONGE ST N/O LAWRENCE AVE | SOURCE: 2011 CENSUS 2012-2013 | SOURCE: TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION 1 KM RADIUS | SOURCE: 2011 CENSUS 5 KM RADIUS | SOURCE: 2011 CENSUS OFFICE ROGERS ROAD ST. -
Eglinton Crosstown West Extension Initial Business Case February 2020
Eglinton Crosstown West Extension Initial Business Case February 2020 Eglinton Crosstown West Extension Initial Business Case February 2020 Contents Executive Summary 1 Scope 1 Method of Analysis 1 Findings 3 Strategic Case 3 Economic Case 3 Financial Case 4 Deliverability and Operations Case 4 Summary 4 Introduction 7 Background 8 Business Case Overview 10 Problem Statement 13 Case for Change 14 Problem Statement 14 Opportunity for Change 15 Key Drivers 16 Strategic Value 18 iv Investment Options 24 Introduction 25 Study Area 25 Options Development 25 Options for Analysis 27 Assumptions for Analysis and Travel Demand Modelling 33 Strategic Case 34 Introduction 35 Strategic Objective 1 – Connect More Places with Better Frequent Rapid Transit 38 Criterion 1: To provide high quality transit to more people in more places 38 Criterion 2: To address the connectivity gap between Eglinton Crosstown LRT and Transitway BRT 40 Strategic Objective 2 – Improve Transit’s Convenience and Attractiveness 42 Criterion 2: To provide more reliable, safe and enjoyable travel experience 42 Criterion 2: To boost transit use and attractiveness among local residents and workers 45 Strategic Objective 3 – Promote Healthier and More Sustainable Travel Behaviours 52 Criterion 1: To improve liveability through reduction in traffic delays, auto dependency and air pollution 52 Criterion 2: To encourage use of active modes to access stations 53 v Strategic Objective 4 – Encourage Transit-Supportive Development 57 Criterion 1: Compatibility with Existing Neighbourhood -
Enhanced Eglinton West Rapid Transit Initial Business Case Analysis
APPENDIX 4 ENHANCED EGLINTON WEST RAPID TRANSIT INITIAL BUSINESS CASE ANALYSIS JUNE 2016 Cover Image: Marcus Bowman TABLE OF CONTENTS Problem Statement II 1.0 Introduction 1 2.0 Context 2 3.0 Study Overview 4 4.0 Strategic Case 9 5.0 Financial Case 18 6.0 Economic Case 20 7.0 Deliverability and Operations Case 23 8.0 Next Steps 25 Appendix 26 I PROBLEM STATEMENT The implementation of the Mississauga BRT, Eglinton Crosstown Phase 1, as well as Union Pearson Express and RER connections at Mt. Dennis will bring vital rapid transit improvements to the Eglinton corridor and the region, but will also leave a key gap in the rapid transit network along Eglinton West between Mt. Dennis and Renforth Gateway. The corridor provides an opportunity for a connection to Pearson Airport and surrounding employment by linking communities, people, and jobs to and along the Mississauga BRT and Eglinton LRT. An Environmental Assessment was completed in 2010 for an at- grade LRT through the corridor with 14 stops along Eglinton Ave at all cross roads. In the context of current planning work being coordinated between Metrolinx and the City of Toronto there is a need to develop feasible options to optimize the 2010 EA design and understand their various benefits to different users and travel patterns. II INITIAL BUSINESS CASE 1.0 INTRODUCTION Eglinton West: A Gap in the Regional Rapid Transit Network The Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area’s Regional Transportation Plan, The Big Move, was adopted in 2008 and set out a 25-year vision for supporting growth in the region. -
Approval of Art Concepts for Coxwell, Wellesley, Royal York, Ossington and St
STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED Approval of Art Concepts for Coxwell, Wellesley, Royal York, Ossington and St. Clair West Stations Date: December 16, 2015 To: TTC Board From: Chief Executive Officer Summary In accordance with the TTC’s “Art in Public Transit Facilities” policy, public art is being provided at five stations as part of the Easier Access Phase III and Second Exit projects and is being administered in groups in co-ordination with the project construction schedules. Five stations are included in this initial group: Coxwell, Wellesley, Royal York, Ossington and St. Clair West. An open call for artist prequalification was held and a jury selected three artists per station to provide art concepts. Artists and art concepts for the five stations were selected by juries consisting of artists, art educators and art administrators including a local representative, and the TTC’s chief architect and were facilitated by the TTC’s art consultant. The concepts have been shown to the community as part of a series of public open houses. Recommendations It is recommended that the Board approve the public art concepts for these projects, noting that the TTC’s “Policy for Art in Public Transit Facilities” has been followed: Coxwell Station Easier Access: “Forwards and Backwards” by Jennifer Davis and Jon Sasaki; Wellesley Station Second Exit and Easier Access: Low-relief sculptural mosaic by Gisele Amantea; Royal York Station Easier Access: “rabbit STOP” by Noel Harding; Ossington Station Easier Access: “The Particles” by Scott Eunson and Staff report for action on Approval of Art Concept - EAIII 1 St. Clair West Station: “The Commuters” by Rhonda Weppler and Trevor Mahovsky.