DOCSLIB.ORG

(Ephemeroptera) Phylogeny Using Molecular (18S Rdna) Data

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
(Ephemeroptera) Phylogeny Using Molecular (18S Rdna) Data SYSTEMATICS Tests of Current Hypotheses of Mayfly (Ephemeroptera) Phylogeny Using Molecular (18s rDNA) Data LU SUN, ANIKO SABO,1 M. D. MEYER,2 R. P. RANDOLPH,3 LUKE M. JACOBUS, W. P. MCCAFFERTY, AND VIRGINIA R. FERRIS Department of Entomology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907 Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 99(2): 241Ð252 (2006) ABSTRACT Partial 18s rDNA sequences from 22 exemplar mayßy species (Ephemeroptera) rep- resenting 20 families were analyzed to obtain a best phylogenetic tree for comparison to previous phylogenetic hypotheses. With respect to relationships among the three major groupings, our mo- lecular data support the hypothesis that Pisciforma and Setisura comprise a monophyletic sister group to the Furcatergalia, rather than the hypothesis that Setisura and Furcatergalia comprise a mono- phyletic group stemming from the Pisciforma. Within Pisciforma, acceptable trees show that Baetidae separates at the base of the Pisciforma clade. The data suggest that Pisciforma is paraphyletic and do not support the grouping of all Southern hemisphere families as a monophyletic group. An evolu- tionary sequence favored by the data suggests a grouping of Siphlonuridae, Rallidentidae, Nesame- letidae, and Ameletidae and a grouping of Oniscigastridae, Ameletopsidae, and Acanthametropodidae. The data support the monophyly of Setisura (Heptageniidae, Arthropleidae, Pseudironidae, Oligo- neuriidae, Isonychiidae, and Coloburiscidae). Within Setisura, a bootstrap/jackknife test places the families Heptageniidae, Arthropleidae, and Pseudironidae in one clade at 100% frequency. Also supported are hypotheses that Pseudironidae is a sister group to a HeptageniidaeÐArthropleidae group and that a sister relationship exists between the latter two families. Hypotheses that Pseudironidae separated from other Setisura families at an earlier stage and comprises a sister group to a Heptage- niidaeÐOligonuriidae lineage or that Pseudironidae should be moved out of Setisura are not supported. KEY WORDS Ephemeroptera, 18s rDNA, phylogeny EPHEMEROPTERA IS ONE OF the most archaic of extant four recent suborders, Furcatergalia, which was some- winged insect orders (Kukalova´-Peck 1985). The times previously referred to as Rectracheata (McCaf- higher classiÞcation of Ephemeroptera has evolved ferty 1991b), includes Leptophlebiidae, Behningiidae, considerably over the past 200 yr to include progres- all pannote families (Pannota), and all tusked bur- sively more higher taxa. However, the use of strict rower families (Scapphodonta); Setisura includes the phylogenetic classiÞcation is relatively recent (Mc- ßat-headed mayßies and their hypothesized minnow- Cafferty 1991b), and cladistic data have been mostly like mayßy ancestral groups, including all forms that morphological in nature. In this study, we used mo- passively Þlter food with their forelegs; Pisciforma lecular data to test the various hypotheses outlined includes all other minnowlike mayßies; and Carapacea below regarding certain aspects of the phylogeny of includes Baetiscidae and Prosopistomatidae. Ephemeroptera. Relationship between Carapacea and Other May- Suborder Level Classification of Ephemeroptera. flies. As a distinct monophyletic group supported by At present, four major groupings are generally recog- series of synapomorphies (e.g., the presence of a larval nized in Ephemeroptera under various names. We carapace), the BaetiscidaeÐProsopistomatidae rela- follow a classiÞcation system (Table 1) taken from tionship was suggested by various researchers (Ed- McCafferty (1991b) and its modiÞcations by Wang munds and Traver 1954). Kluge (1998) and McCaf- and McCafferty (1995), McCafferty (1997, 2004), and ferty and Wang (2000) showed the group to be basally McCafferty and Wang (2000). In this classiÞcation of derived with its sister group represented by all other extant mayßies, which share synapomorphic fore- wings with the tornus located between the ends of 1 Human Genome Sequencing Center, Baylor College of Medicine, veins CuA and CuP (CuP and A1 terminating in the Houston, TX 77030. anal margin, rather than the outer margin, of the 2 Department of Biology, Christopher Newport University, wings). McCafferty (1997) Þrst referred to the Baetis- Newport News, VA 23606. 3 Section of Evolution and Ecology, University of California, Davis, cidaeÐProsopistomatidae grouping as the suborder CA 95616. Carapacea. In our study using molecular data, all trees 0013-8746/06/0241Ð0252$04.00/0 ᭧ 2006 Entomological Society of America 242 ANNALS OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA Vol. 99, no. 2 Table 1. McCafferty classification system of extant taxa followed in this study, with families arranged alphabetically within their groupings Suborder Infraorder Superfamily Family Carapacea Baetiscidae Prosopistomatidae Furcatergalia Lanceolata Leptophlebiidae Palpotarsa Behningiidae Scapphodonta Potamanthoidea Potamanthidae Euthyplocioidea Euthyplociidae Ephemeroidea Ephemeridae Ichthybotidae Palingeniidae Polymitarcyidae Pannota Caenoidea Caenidae Neoephemeridae Ephemerelloidea Coryphoridae Dicercomyzidae Ephemerellidae Ephemerythidae Leptohyphidae Machadorythidae Melanemerellidae Teloganellidae Teloganodidae Tricorythidae Vietnamellidae Pisciforma Acanthametropodidae Ameletidae Ameletopsidae Ametropodidae Baetidae Dipteromimidae Metretopodidae Nesameletidae Oniscigastridae Rallidentidae Siphlaenigmatidae Siphlonuridae Siphluriscidae Setisura Arthropleidae Coloburiscidae Isonychiidae Heptageniidae Oligoneuriidae Pseudironidae that we modiÞed and tested recognize the hypothesis by a series of synapomorphies (McCafferty 1991a, that Baetiscidae, as a representative of Carapacea, is Wang and McCafferty 1995, Kluge 1998). An alterna- the most basal clade. tive hypothesis regarding the relationships among the Phylogenetic Hypotheses Regarding Furcatergalia, three major groupings was given by Kluge et al. (1995) Setisura, and Pisciforma. Among the suborders Fur- and Kluge (1998, 2004), in which the Pisciforma catergalia, Setisura, and Pisciforma, which accommo- group (called Tridentiseta) and a Setisura-Furcater- date the majority of mayßy families, Pisciforma and galia group (called Bidentiseta) were considered sis- Setisura were considered to be derived together, ter clades, although Kluge admitted that Pisciforma constituting a sister clade to the Furcatergalia (Mc- was probably paraphyletic. KlugeÕs grouping of Seti- Cafferty and Edmunds 1979, Landa and Soldan 1985, ´ sura and Furcatergalia together was supported by a McCafferty 1991b, Tomka and Elpers 1991). The presumed initial presence of two dentisetae on larval monophyly of the Furcatergalia and the PisciformaÐ Setisura groups were supported by anatomic synapo- maxillae. Within this grouping, Setisura (or Branchit- morphies, including the presence of the ventral anas- ergaliae) and Furcatergalia (or Furcatergaliae) also tomosis of tracheae in segments other than 8 and 9 of were considered monophyletic groups. Solda´n and the abdomen, and the absence of branches of a dorsal Putz (2000) proposed another hypothesis based on trunk of tracheae formed in the head, respectively karyotype evidence that generally resembled KlugeÕs (Tomka and Elpers 1991). Within the PisciformaÐ hypothesis. It differed from the latter in the arrange- Setisura clade, no clear evidence has supported the ment of lineages within the hypothesized Furcater- monophyly of Pisciforma, and McCafferty and Ed- galiaÐSetisura group by treating Scapphodonta, Lep- munds (1979) indicated it was extremely paraphyletic. tophlebiidae, and Setisura as a monophyletic sister Monophyly of Setisura, however, is clearly supported group to Pannota (Fig. 3). March 2006 SUN ET AL.: MAYFLY PHYLOGENY 243 Phylogeny among Major Groups within Furcater- eages, which were deduced from a systematic study galia. The suborder Furcatergalia is generally thought of mayßy anatomy. Based on internal anatomical data to be monophyletic, with major clades Leptophlebi- and other morphological evidence of Landa and Sol- idae, Scapphodonta, and Pannota containing Ͼ15 fam- da´n (1985), Tomka and Elpers (1991) suggested an ilies. It has been generally recognized that within the evolutionary tree for mayßy families in which most of Furcatergalia, Leptophlebiidae is a basal lineage the clades were supported by presumed synapo- (Kluge 1998), and a sister group to a relatively derived morphies. Within the PisciformaÐSetisura grouping, clade that includes a pair of sister groups, Scapph- Ametropodidae was thought to branch Þrst, with odonta and Pannota (McCafferty and Wang 2000) in other families sharing the nerve ganglion of abdominal addition to a more basal lineage represented by the segment one merging with that of the metathorax. Behningiidae (McCafferty 2004). Scapphodonta and Siphlonuridae (Siphlonuridae and Dipteromimidae Pannota are both monophyletic and are supported by in Table 1) and Rallidentidae (Rallidentidae, Nesa- a series of morphological synapomorphies (McCaf- meletidae, and Ameletidae in Table 1) were thought ferty and Wang 2000, McCafferty 2004). In our study, to be sister groups that branched next, with other we followed this arrangement of branches within Fur- families lacking a nerve ganglion in abdominal seg- catergalia in our construction of hypothesized phylo- ment 8. Acanthametropodidae and Ameletopsidae genetic trees. were thought to branch next from the remainder that Relationships Regarding the Pisciforma–Setisura included Baetidae, Metretopodidae, and Setisura, Grouping. When Ulmer (1920) Þrst introduced
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A New Species of Behningia Lestage, 1929 (Ephemerotera: Behningiidae) from China
    Zootaxa 4671 (3): 420–426 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) https://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2019 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4671.3.7 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:EED176F4-BDA3-4053-A36C-8A76D3C4C186 A new species of Behningia Lestage, 1929 (Ephemerotera: Behningiidae) from China XIONGDONG ZHOU1, MIKE BISSET2, MENGZHEN XU3,5 & ZHAOYIN WANG4 1State Key Laboratory of Hydroscience and Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China. E-mail: [email protected] 2Department of Physics, Tsinghua University, Beiing, China. E-mail: [email protected] 3State Key Laboratory of Hydroscience and Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China. E-mail: [email protected] 4State Key Laboratory of Hydroscience and Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China. E-mail: [email protected] 5Corresponding author Abstract A new species of sand-burrowing mayfly (Ephemeroptera: Behningiidae), Behningia nujiangensis Zhou & Bisset, is described based on more than 50 nymphs collected from the Nujiang River in Yunnan Province, P.R. China. This is the first species of the family Behningiidae discovered in China. It is also the second species of genus Behningia, and the third species of the family Behningiidae collected from the Oriental biogeographic region. The shapes of the labrum and the labium in B. nujiangensis are markedly different from those found in other species of Behningia. Differences in the mandibles, the galea-lacina of maxillae, and both the prothoracic and metathoracic legs differentiate B. nujiangensis from both B. baei and B. ulmeri. The biology of and conservation challenges for B. nujiangensis are also briefly discussed.
    [Show full text]
  • Pisciforma, Setisura, and Furcatergalia (Order: Ephemeroptera) Are Not Monophyletic Based on 18S Rdna Sequences: a Reply to Sun Et Al
    Utah Valley University From the SelectedWorks of T. Heath Ogden 2008 Pisciforma, Setisura, and Furcatergalia (Order: Ephemeroptera) are not monophyletic based on 18S rDNA sequences: A Reply to Sun et al. (2006) T. Heath Ogden, Utah Valley University Available at: https://works.bepress.com/heath_ogden/9/ LETTERS TO THE EDITOR Pisciforma, Setisura, and Furcatergalia (Order: Ephemeroptera) Are Not Monophyletic Based on 18S rDNA Sequences: A Response to Sun et al. (2006) 1 2 3 T. HEATH OGDEN, MICHEL SARTORI, AND MICHAEL F. WHITING Sun et al. (2006) recently published an analysis of able on GenBank October 2003. However, they chose phylogenetic relationships of the major lineages of not to include 34 other mayßy 18S rDNA sequences mayßies (Ephemeroptera). Their study used partial that were available 18 mo before submission of their 18S rDNA sequences (Ϸ583 nucleotides), which were manuscript (sequences available October 2003; their analyzed via parsimony to obtain a molecular phylo- manuscript was submitted 1 March 2005). If the au- genetic hypothesis. Their study included 23 mayßy thors had included these additional taxa, they would species, representing 20 families. They aligned the have increased their generic and familial level sam- DNA sequences via default settings in Clustal and pling to include lineages such as Leptohyphidae, Pota- reconstructed a tree by using parsimony in PAUP*. manthidae, Behningiidae, Neoephemeridae, Epheme- However, this tree was not presented in the article, rellidae, and Euthyplociidae. Additionally, there were nor have they made the topology or alignment avail- 194 sequences available (as of 1 March 2005) for other able despite multiple requests. This molecular tree molecular markers, aside from 18S, that could have was compared with previous hypotheses based on been used to investigate higher level relationships.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Report110
    ~ ~ WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES A Survey of Rare and Endangered Mayflies of Selected RESEARCH Rivers of Wisconsin by Richard A. Lillie REPORT110 Bureau of Research, Monona December 1995 ~ Abstract The mayfly fauna of 25 rivers and streams in Wisconsin were surveyed during 1991-93 to document the temporal and spatial occurrence patterns of two state endangered mayflies, Acantha­ metropus pecatonica and Anepeorus simplex. Both species are candidates under review for addition to the federal List of Endang­ ered and Threatened Wildlife. Based on previous records of occur­ rence in Wisconsin, sampling was conducted during the period May-July using a combination of sampling methods, including dredges, air-lift pumps, kick-nets, and hand-picking of substrates. No specimens of Anepeorus simplex were collected. Three specimens (nymphs or larvae) of Acanthametropus pecatonica were found in the Black River, one nymph was collected from the lower Wisconsin River, and a partial exuviae was collected from the Chippewa River. Homoeoneuria ammophila was recorded from Wisconsin waters for the first time from the Black River and Sugar River. New site distribution records for the following Wiscon­ sin special concern species include: Macdunnoa persimplex, Metretopus borealis, Paracloeodes minutus, Parameletus chelifer, Pentagenia vittigera, Cercobrachys sp., and Pseudiron centra/is. Collection of many of the aforementioned species from large rivers appears to be dependent upon sampling sand-bottomed substrates at frequent intervals, as several species were relatively abundant during only very short time spans. Most species were associated with sand substrates in water < 2 m deep. Acantha­ metropus pecatonica and Anepeorus simplex should continue to be listed as endangered for state purposes and receive a biological rarity ranking of critically imperiled (S1 ranking), and both species should be considered as candidates proposed for listing as endangered or threatened as defined by the Endangered Species Act.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on Italian Heptageniidae (Ephemeroptera). Rhithrogena Fiorii Grandi, 1953 and R
    Aquatic Insects, Vol. 5 (1983), No. 2, pp. 69-76. Notes on Italian Heptageniidae (Ephemeroptera). Rhithrogena fiorii Grandi, 1953 and R. adrianae sp. n. by Carlo BELFIORE (Roma) ABSTRACT Rhithrogena adrianae, a new species related to R. diaphana Nav., is described from nymphs and male imagines collected in Central Italy. Taxonomic characters of nymphs and males of R. fiorii Grandi, whose nymphal stage was previously unknown, are also described and figured. Lectotype is designated for R. fiorii. The taxonomic status of Rhithrogena fiorii Grandi, 1953, described from winged stages only, was till now very uncertain. The type locality, near Bologna, is now altered by buildings and factories: R. fiorii has probably disappeared from that site. I have examined in Grandi's collection the specimens referred by her to R. fiorii, labelled: "Bologna, S. Luca, 16.III.1952 (l >, l < subim.), 20.III.1954 (l <, l > subim, l < subim.), 20.11.1955 (1 > subim.), 17.III.1955 (l <), .IV. 1955 (l >).I designate lectotype the male imago collected on 16.III. 1952. None of the spe- cimens is in a good state of preservation. Titillators are not truncate (Grandi, 1960: fig. 21,6 and pag. 91), but with few pointed lobes at the apex. During the first months of 1980 and 1981, in the river Mignone, near Rome, I collected and reared a hundred nymphs of Rhithrogena, from which I obtained some subimagines and two male imagines, easily referable to R. fiorii. I describe herein the taxonomic features of nymphs and males of this species. I also describe the male imago and nymph of a new species of Rhithrogena which lives in the same localities as R.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Newsletter and Bibliography of the International Society of Plecopterologists PERLA NO. 37, 2019
    PERLA Annual Newsletter and Bibliography of The International Society of Plecopterologists Nemoura cinerea (Retzius, 1783) (Nemouridae): Slovenia, near Planina, cave entrance to Ucina River, 15 June 2008. Photograph by Bill P. Stark PERLA NO. 37, 2019 Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado 80523 USA PERLA Annual Newsletter and Bibliography of the International Society of Plecopterologists Available on Request to the Managing Editor MANAGING EDITOR: Boris C. Kondratieff Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado 80523 USA E-mail: [email protected] EDITORIAL BOARD: Richard W. Baumann Department of Biology and Monte L. Bean Life Science Museum Brigham Young University Provo, Utah 84602 USA E-mail: [email protected] J. Manuel Tierno de Figueroa Dpto. de Zoología Facultad de Ciencias Universidad de Granada 18071 Granada, SPAIN E-mail: [email protected] Shigekazu Uchida Aichi Institute of Technology 1247 Yagusa Toyota 470-0392, JAPAN E-mail: [email protected] Peter Zwick Schwarzer Stock 9 D-36110 Schlitz, GERMANY E-mail: [email protected] 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Subscription policy... ............................................................................................................ 3 The XVth International Conference on Ephemeroptera and XIXth International Symposium on Plecoptera .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ohio EPA Macroinvertebrate Taxonomic Level December 2019 1 Table 1. Current Taxonomic Keys and the Level of Taxonomy Routinely U
    Ohio EPA Macroinvertebrate Taxonomic Level December 2019 Table 1. Current taxonomic keys and the level of taxonomy routinely used by the Ohio EPA in streams and rivers for various macroinvertebrate taxonomic classifications. Genera that are reasonably considered to be monotypic in Ohio are also listed. Taxon Subtaxon Taxonomic Level Taxonomic Key(ies) Species Pennak 1989, Thorp & Rogers 2016 Porifera If no gemmules are present identify to family (Spongillidae). Genus Thorp & Rogers 2016 Cnidaria monotypic genera: Cordylophora caspia and Craspedacusta sowerbii Platyhelminthes Class (Turbellaria) Thorp & Rogers 2016 Nemertea Phylum (Nemertea) Thorp & Rogers 2016 Phylum (Nematomorpha) Thorp & Rogers 2016 Nematomorpha Paragordius varius monotypic genus Thorp & Rogers 2016 Genus Thorp & Rogers 2016 Ectoprocta monotypic genera: Cristatella mucedo, Hyalinella punctata, Lophopodella carteri, Paludicella articulata, Pectinatella magnifica, Pottsiella erecta Entoprocta Urnatella gracilis monotypic genus Thorp & Rogers 2016 Polychaeta Class (Polychaeta) Thorp & Rogers 2016 Annelida Oligochaeta Subclass (Oligochaeta) Thorp & Rogers 2016 Hirudinida Species Klemm 1982, Klemm et al. 2015 Anostraca Species Thorp & Rogers 2016 Species (Lynceus Laevicaudata Thorp & Rogers 2016 brachyurus) Spinicaudata Genus Thorp & Rogers 2016 Williams 1972, Thorp & Rogers Isopoda Genus 2016 Holsinger 1972, Thorp & Rogers Amphipoda Genus 2016 Gammaridae: Gammarus Species Holsinger 1972 Crustacea monotypic genera: Apocorophium lacustre, Echinogammarus ischnus, Synurella dentata Species (Taphromysis Mysida Thorp & Rogers 2016 louisianae) Crocker & Barr 1968; Jezerinac 1993, 1995; Jezerinac & Thoma 1984; Taylor 2000; Thoma et al. Cambaridae Species 2005; Thoma & Stocker 2009; Crandall & De Grave 2017; Glon et al. 2018 Species (Palaemon Pennak 1989, Palaemonidae kadiakensis) Thorp & Rogers 2016 1 Ohio EPA Macroinvertebrate Taxonomic Level December 2019 Taxon Subtaxon Taxonomic Level Taxonomic Key(ies) Informal grouping of the Arachnida Hydrachnidia Smith 2001 water mites Genus Morse et al.
    [Show full text]
  • CHAPTER 4: EPHEMEROPTERA (Mayflies)
    Guide to Aquatic Invertebrate Families of Mongolia | 2009 CHAPTER 4 EPHEMEROPTERA (Mayflies) EPHEMEROPTERA Draft June 17, 2009 Chapter 4 | EPHEMEROPTERA 45 Guide to Aquatic Invertebrate Families of Mongolia | 2009 ORDER EPHEMEROPTERA Mayflies 4 Mayfly larvae are found in a variety of locations including lakes, wetlands, streams, and rivers, but they are most common and diverse in lotic habitats. They are common and abundant in stream riffles and pools, at lake margins and in some cases lake bottoms. All mayfly larvae are aquatic with terrestrial adults. In most mayfly species the adult only lives for 1-2 days. Consequently, the majority of a mayfly’s life is spent in the water as a larva. The adult lifespan is so short there is no need for the insect to feed and therefore the adult does not possess functional mouthparts. Mayflies are often an indicator of good water quality because most mayflies are relatively intolerant of pollution. Mayflies are also an important food source for fish. Ephemeroptera Morphology Most mayflies have three caudal filaments (tails) (Figure 4.1) although in some taxa the terminal filament (middle tail) is greatly reduced and there appear to be only two caudal filaments (only one genus actually lacks the terminal filament). Mayflies have gills on the dorsal surface of the abdomen (Figure 4.1), but the number and shape of these gills vary widely between taxa. All mayflies possess only one tarsal claw at the end of each leg (Figure 4.1). Characters such as gill shape, gill position, and tarsal claw shape are used to separate different mayfly families.
    [Show full text]
  • Trichomycetes from Lentic and Lotic Aquatic Habitats in Ontario, Canada
    1449 Trichomycetes from lentic and lotic aquatic habitats in Ontario, Canada D.B. Strongman and Merlin M. White Abstract: Fungi and protists make up an ecological group, trichomycetes, that inhabit the guts of invertebrates, mostly aquatic insects. Trichomycetes are reported herein from arthropods collected in lotic habitats (fast flowing streams) and lentic environments (ponds, ditches, seeps, and lakes) from 11 sites in Algonquin Park and 6 other sites in Ontario, Can- ada. Thirty-two trichomycete species were recovered, including 7 new species: Legeriomyces algonquinensis, Legeriosi- milis leptocerci, Legeriosimilis whitneyi, and Paramoebidium umbonatum are described from mayfly nymphs (Ephemeroptera); Pennella digitata and Glotzia incilis from black fly and midge larvae (Diptera), respectively; and Arun- dinula opeongoensis from a crayfish (Crustacea). Legeriomyces rarus Lichtw. & M.C. Williams and Stachylina penetralis Lichtw. are new North American records, and seven species are documented for the first time in Canada. More common and widely distributed trichomycete species such as Harpella melusinae Le´ger & Duboscq and Smittium culicis Manier, were also recovered. Most previous studies on trichomycetes have been done primarily in lotic environments but clearly lentic systems (e.g., ponds and lakes) harbour diverse arthropod communities and further exploration of these habitats will continue to increase our knowledge of trichomycete diversity. Key words: Amoebidiales, Eccrinales, Harpellales, insect fungal endobionts, symbiotic protista. Re´sume´ : Les champignons et les protistes comportent un groupe e´cologique, les trichomyce`tes, qui habitent les intestins de la plupart des insectes aquatiques. Les auteurs rapportent des ttrichomyce`tes provenant d’arthropodes vivants dans des habitats lotiques (cours d’eau rapides) et des environnements lentiques (e´tangs, fosse´s, suintement et lacs) re´colte´s sur 11 sites dans le parc Algonquin et six autres sites en Ontario, au Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • The Life History, Nymphal Growth Rates, and Feeding Habits of Siphlonisca Aerodromia Needham (Epherneroptera: Siphlonuridae) in ~Aine'
    The life history, nymphal growth rates, and feeding habits of Siphlonisca aerodromia Needham (Epherneroptera: Siphlonuridae) in ~aine' K. ELIZABETHGIBBS AND TERRYM. MINGO Department of Entomology, University of Maine, Orono, ME, U. S. A. 04469 Received March 25. 1985 GIBBS,K. E., and T. M. MINGO.1986. The life history, nymphal growth rates, and feeding habits of Siphlonisca aerodromia Needham (Epherneroptera: Siphlonuridae) in Maine. Can. J. Zool. 64: 427-430. Siphlonisca aerodromia Needham has a univoltine life history in Maine. Adults emerge in late May or early June. Each female contains about 394 large (0.46 mm long) eggs covered with coiled fibers that anchor the eggs to the substrate. Eggs are deposited in the main channel of the stream and small nymphs appear in January. Nymphal growth rate (GHW)was expressed as a percent per day increase in head width. Initially nymphs feed on detritus and grow slowly (GHW= 0.28-0.79) at water temperatures near 0°C. Following snow melt, the nymphs move into the adjacent Carex floodplain. Here, water temperature increases, animal material, in the form of mayfly nymphs, becomes increasingly common in the diet, and growth rate increases (GHW = 2.13-2.89). The sex ratio of nymphs collected in May and June was 1: 1.8 (ma1e:female). GIBBS,K. E., et T. M. MINGO. 1986. The life history, nymphal growth rates, and feeding habits of Siphlonisca aerodromia Needham (Epherneroptera: Siphlonuridae) in Maine. Can. J. Zool. 64: 427-430. Dans le Maine, le cycle de Siphlonisca aerodromia Needham est univoltin. L'emergence des adultes se produit a la fin de mai ou au debut de juin.
    [Show full text]
  • ARTHROPODA Subphylum Hexapoda Protura, Springtails, Diplura, and Insects
    NINE Phylum ARTHROPODA SUBPHYLUM HEXAPODA Protura, springtails, Diplura, and insects ROD P. MACFARLANE, PETER A. MADDISON, IAN G. ANDREW, JOCELYN A. BERRY, PETER M. JOHNS, ROBERT J. B. HOARE, MARIE-CLAUDE LARIVIÈRE, PENELOPE GREENSLADE, ROSA C. HENDERSON, COURTenaY N. SMITHERS, RicarDO L. PALMA, JOHN B. WARD, ROBERT L. C. PILGRIM, DaVID R. TOWNS, IAN McLELLAN, DAVID A. J. TEULON, TERRY R. HITCHINGS, VICTOR F. EASTOP, NICHOLAS A. MARTIN, MURRAY J. FLETCHER, MARLON A. W. STUFKENS, PAMELA J. DALE, Daniel BURCKHARDT, THOMAS R. BUCKLEY, STEVEN A. TREWICK defining feature of the Hexapoda, as the name suggests, is six legs. Also, the body comprises a head, thorax, and abdomen. The number A of abdominal segments varies, however; there are only six in the Collembola (springtails), 9–12 in the Protura, and 10 in the Diplura, whereas in all other hexapods there are strictly 11. Insects are now regarded as comprising only those hexapods with 11 abdominal segments. Whereas crustaceans are the dominant group of arthropods in the sea, hexapods prevail on land, in numbers and biomass. Altogether, the Hexapoda constitutes the most diverse group of animals – the estimated number of described species worldwide is just over 900,000, with the beetles (order Coleoptera) comprising more than a third of these. Today, the Hexapoda is considered to contain four classes – the Insecta, and the Protura, Collembola, and Diplura. The latter three classes were formerly allied with the insect orders Archaeognatha (jumping bristletails) and Thysanura (silverfish) as the insect subclass Apterygota (‘wingless’). The Apterygota is now regarded as an artificial assemblage (Bitsch & Bitsch 2000).
    [Show full text]
  • TB142: Mayflies of Maine: an Annotated Faunal List
    The University of Maine DigitalCommons@UMaine Technical Bulletins Maine Agricultural and Forest Experiment Station 4-1-1991 TB142: Mayflies of aine:M An Annotated Faunal List Steven K. Burian K. Elizabeth Gibbs Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/aes_techbulletin Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Burian, S.K., and K.E. Gibbs. 1991. Mayflies of Maine: An annotated faunal list. Maine Agricultural Experiment Station Technical Bulletin 142. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UMaine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Technical Bulletins by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UMaine. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ISSN 0734-9556 Mayflies of Maine: An Annotated Faunal List Steven K. Burian and K. Elizabeth Gibbs Technical Bulletin 142 April 1991 MAINE AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION Mayflies of Maine: An Annotated Faunal List Steven K. Burian Assistant Professor Department of Biology, Southern Connecticut State University New Haven, CT 06515 and K. Elizabeth Gibbs Associate Professor Department of Entomology University of Maine Orono, Maine 04469 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Financial support for this project was provided by the State of Maine Departments of Environmental Protection, and Inland Fisheries and Wildlife; a University of Maine New England, Atlantic Provinces, and Quebec Fellow­ ship to S. K. Burian; and the Maine Agricultural Experiment Station. Dr. William L. Peters and Jan Peters, Florida A & M University, pro­ vided support and advice throughout the project and we especially appreci­ ated the opportunity for S.K. Burian to work in their laboratory and stay in their home in Tallahassee, Florida.
    [Show full text]
  • Functional Feeding Groups of Aquatic Insect Families in Latin America: a Critical Analysis and Review of Existing Literature
    Functional feeding groups of aquatic insect families in Latin America: a critical analysis and review of existing literature Alonso Ramírez1 & Pablo E. Gutiérrez-Fonseca2 1. Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Puerto Rico, P.O. Box 190341, San Juan, Puerto Rico 00919; [email protected] 2. Department of Biology, University of Puerto Rico Rio Piedras, San Juan, Puerto Rico 00919; [email protected] Received 12-XII-2013. Corrected 20-I-2014. Accepted 13-II-2014. Abstract: Aquatic macroinvertebrates are involved in numerous processes within aquatic ecosystems. They often have important effects on ecosystem processes such as primary production (via grazing), detritus break- down, and nutrient mineralization and downstream spiraling. The functional feeding groups (FFG) classification was developed as a tool to facilitate the incorporation of macroinvertebrates in studies of aquatic ecosystems. This classification has the advantage of combining morphological characteristics (e.g., mouth part specializa- tion) and behavioral mechanisms (e.g., way of feeding) used by macroinvertebrates when consuming resources. Although recent efforts have greatly advanced our ability to identify aquatic macroinvertebrates, there is limited information on FFG assignment. Furthermore, there has been some variation in the use of the FFG classification, in part due to an emphasis on using gut content analysis to assign FFG, which is more appropriate for assigning trophic guilds. Thus, the main goals of this study are to (1) provide an overview of the value of using the FFG classification, (2) make an initial attempt to summarize available information on FFG for aquatic insects in Latin America, and (3) provide general guidelines on how to assign organisms to their FFGs.
    [Show full text]