The River Neva and the Imperial Façade: Culture and Environment in Nineteenth Century St

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The River Neva and the Imperial Façade: Culture and Environment in Nineteenth Century St View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship Repository THE RIVER NEVA AND THE IMPERIAL FAÇADE: CULTURE AND ENVIRONMENT IN NINETEENTH CENTURY ST. PETERSBURG RUSSIA BY RANDALL DILLS DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History in the Graduate College of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2010 Urbana, Illinois Doctoral Committee: Associate Professor John W. Randolph, Chair Professor Diane P. Koenker Professor Mark D. Steinberg Associate Professor Valeria Sobol Abstract My dissertation seeks to understand how the Neva River, the most important artery connecting St. Petersburg to the rest of the Russian Empire and Europe to the west, affected the political and social life of the imperial capital at the beginning of the nineteenth century. I imagine the river Neva as the lifeblood of an imperial capital, a river city in which I will examine the relation of water to historical actors that experienced it socially, culturally, and environmentally. I argue that the river had a paramount role in shaping life and events in the city even as generations of engineers attempted to convert it into a stately built environment, a watery counterpart to the capitals granite palaces, prospects, squares, and markets while at the same time enabling a capitalist transformation to occur along the banks. There is no question that the river defined Russia‘s capital—physically and symbolically. Ever since the founding of Peter the Great‘s ―paradise‖ on the banks of the Neva in 1703, the foundations of the city, both physical and intellectual, have been anything but solid, as a volatile mix of social groups interacted with the inhospitable natural environment. I propose that the river is a prism through which to examine the intersection of agendas of the Emperors and the new urbanites. The river is a site of struggle between state efforts at technological, social, and cultural control, and a burgeoning city population determined to claim the river as their own through work and leisure as they formed a new urban identity. This interdisciplinary history of the environmental and social spaces on and around the Neva will illuminate the nature of power and the power of nature at work in the city. The environment has wreaked havoc on the city that grew around the islands that form the city‘s center. Officials bent on conquering nature and empire with rational and systematic planning combated the river with flood controls, granite embankments, canals and bridges. These ii contests with nature provided the city with essential features of its image and made it a livable and productive, though dangerous site of commerce and transportation. Upon this precarious physical foundation, the river, frozen in the winter and free-flowing in warm months, gave rise to what I call a ―river culture.‖ Sources show that the different social groups in the city invested experiences within the city with radically different meanings that reveal the fault lines of local identity and imperial power. Thus, various groups of citizens and the state sought to define the city through competing narratives, actions, and technologies that included grandeur, modernity, and doom. My contribution to the historiography of Russian history is to use water as the lens to chart the transformation of St. Petersburg from the model city of the eighteenth century to the to a more cosmopolitan, capitalist city of the nineteenth. As the government sought to maintain its hold on the shape and order of the city, new groups of urban actors, including residents, entrepreneurs and engineers, inserted their specialized experience and knowledge into the public arena to shape the city that had been set out to imperial specifications. These battles were fought again and again in disputes about the meaning, use, and delivery of water in the city. Chapter 1 explores the patterns of river use in the water network of the city, demonstrating the reasons why the river and waterways of the city reveal social, political, and cultural relationships of groups in the capital. Chapter 2, ―The Mountain Came to Us: St. Petersburg and the Flood of 1824‖ serves as a case study of the November 7, 1824 flood that became seared in the memory of Petersburgers. The chapter considers not only the tumultuous events of that day, but the aftermath in which the government sought to redefine its notions of what Petersburg was and the contested memories that resulted. Chapter 3 examines the interaction between the state and key non-state groups at one particular site, the settlement at iii Galernaia Harbor near south end of Vasilevskii Island as the government sought to relocate the village after the 1824 flood. Chapter 4 follows a new professional class of engineers that maintained a lived city by engaging the saturation of water, and how they helped the state to define the river. These engineers were agents of the state, yet saw themselves as apart from the state at the same time, as they built the infrastructure that made the city functional and supported imperial claims of grandeur. Chapter 5 is the story of the haphazard, convulsive history of sanitation, piping, and water delivery in the city as professional and private initiative came into conflict with state interests in defining the needs for water and sanitation networks in the city. Public disputes show engineers engaged in a fragile civil society and actively participating in defining what was modern, moral, and clean. iv For Kathryn L. Dills (1944-2007) v Acknowledgements While researching and writing this dissertation, I have accumulated significant debts to many people and it is with gratitude that I acknowledge them here. I owe an enormous intellectual debt to John Randolph, Mark Steinberg, Diane Koenker, and Valeria Sobol for the challenging and rousing discussions and critiques of my work at every step of the dissertation process. My colleagues Amanda Brian, Nathan Clarke, Erica Fraser, and Danielle Kinsey, along with Melissa Rohde and Anita Bravo provided meaningful and valuable suggestions on the potential directions of the project. I especially wish to thank the members of the Russian Circle at the University of Illinois, especially Gregory Stroud and Andy Bruno who provided commentaries on Chapter 2. At Central Washington University, Roxanne Easley provided guidance and inspiration to pursue Russian History. In Russia, the archivists and librarians at The Russian National Library, The Central State Archive of the St. Petersburg and Leningrad Oblast, The Library of the Russian Academy of Sciences in St. Petersburg and officials, including Felix Karmazinov and Ivan Krasnov, at the Museum of Water at the Water Utility Vodokanal assisted me in collecting materials on which the dissertation is based. I thank the United States Department of Education for supporting my research in Russia as a Fulbright-Hays DDRA Fellow, and for providing three years of FLAS funding essential for conducting research in Russia. At the University of Illinois, The Human Dimensions of Environmental Systems Fellowship Program led by Michael Krassa provided a venue for pursuing interdisciplinary research and a forum for presenting my work. The Department of History at the University of Illinois provided generous funding for research and writing. The Russian, East-European and Eurasian Center at the University of Illinois generously provided travel grants allowing me to engage with other scholars. In Russia, I am grateful to Anna Sineokova-Ojosazule, Andrei Dovzhikov, Veikko Torvinen, Boris Kolonitskii, and Curtis and Nastasia Harris. In the United States, Olga Orgurtsova and Dinara Georgeoliani spurred me to greater heights in the study of Russian Language. I especially thank Ivan Borisov for his knowledge of the Slavic Library and his consistent support for the project. Mark Smith provided insights on engineering and steamboats. The enduring friendships of Clark Ahlden, Creighton Comer, Terry Ewing, Kurt Hegeman, David Mannen, John and Pat Mannen, Kent Whitesell, Jeff Shafton, Monika Vanko, and Barry and Lorrie Moore sustained me throughout the project. Many, many more friends, family members and colleagues contributed support, conversation, couches, coffee, music and meals as this project wound toward completion. Finally, to my many co-workers from March Point to Hobbico, and every odd job in-between, you have my gratitude and admiration. vi Table of Contents Introduction………………………………………………………………………………..viii Chapter 1: ―Seasons of the Capital: Patterns of River Use on the Neva, 1800-1863‖……. 1 Chapter 2: ―The Mountain Came to Us‖: St. Petersburg and the Flood of 1824 as Event... 28 Chapter 3: ―The Province in the City: The State and the Settlement at Galernaia Harbor, 1824-1862‖…………………………………………………………………………………57 Chapter 4: ―Beneath the Imperial Façade: Engineers, Professionalism and a Path to Modernity 1809-1878‖…………………………………………………………... 80 Chapter 5: “Engineers in Society: Morals, Pipes and Public Discussion of Cleanliness and Water in St. Petersburg, 1858-1886"………………………………………………... 113 Conclusion………………………………………………………………………………...137 Bibliography……………………………………………………………………………... 141 vii Introduction ―For the springs both of good and evil flow from the prince, over a whole nation, as from a lasting fountain.‖ —Sir Thomas More, Utopia, Book One. На балкон, Печален, смутен, вышел он И молвил: "С божией
Recommended publications
  • Catherine the Great and the Development of a Modern Russian Sovereignty, 1762-1796
    Catherine the Great and the Development of a Modern Russian Sovereignty, 1762-1796 By Thomas Lucius Lowish A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Victoria Frede-Montemayor, Chair Professor Jonathan Sheehan Professor Kinch Hoekstra Spring 2021 Abstract Catherine the Great and the Development of a Modern Russian Sovereignty, 1762-1796 by Thomas Lucius Lowish Doctor of Philosophy in History University of California, Berkeley Professor Victoria Frede-Montemayor, Chair Historians of Russian monarchy have avoided the concept of sovereignty, choosing instead to describe how monarchs sought power, authority, or legitimacy. This dissertation, which centers on Catherine the Great, the empress of Russia between 1762 and 1796, takes on the concept of sovereignty as the exercise of supreme and untrammeled power, considered legitimate, and shows why sovereignty was itself the major desideratum. Sovereignty expressed parity with Western rulers, but it would allow Russian monarchs to bring order to their vast domain and to meaningfully govern the lives of their multitudinous subjects. This dissertation argues that Catherine the Great was a crucial figure in this process. Perceiving the confusion and disorder in how her predecessors exercised power, she recognized that sovereignty required both strong and consistent procedures as well as substantial collaboration with the broadest possible number of stakeholders. This was a modern conception of sovereignty, designed to regulate the swelling mechanisms of the Russian state. Catherine established her system through careful management of both her own activities and the institutions and servitors that she saw as integral to the system.
    [Show full text]
  • St. Petersburg Case Study
    250 i\R(HITE<TLIKE: MATERIAL AND IMAGINED Re-forming Architecture and Planning through Urban Design: St. Petersburg Case Study MATTHEW J. BELL University of Maryland INTRODUCTION the city. The program was also designed to appeal to upper- level graduate architecture and planning students and to Political changes in the former Soviet Union have had a sornehow synthesize the traditional concerns of each of those concurrent effect upon the physical landscape of the cities of disciplines: the physical fonn of the city in the case of the that country. Some cities have seen the invasion, for lack of architects; and the problems and in a sense 'fonn' of the city a better way to describe conditions, of capitalism and the from a social and econolnic view in the case of the planning subsequent frenzy of speculative building activity in the st~dents.~ fonn of new office buildings and the explosion of retail centers. Most of this building activity has been confined to HISTORY OF THE SITE Moscow which, because of differences in regional laws and statutes, has been the most aggressive place in seeking new St. Petersburg was founded on the banks of the Neva River development. by Peter the Great in 1703 on one of the most unlikely of In contrast to the exploding development scene in Mos- places, a low lying, swampy area, many miles north of the cow, the czarist capital of St. Petersburg has seen relatively centers of Russian population. Peter established the city in little new construction and a dearth of almost any building order to counter the claims of the Swedish crown to the Gulf activity in its central district.
    [Show full text]
  • Future of the Obvodny Canal—The Main Line of the Saint
    Architecture and Engineering Volume 2 Issue 4 FUTURE OF THE OBVODNY CANAL — THE MAIN LINE OF THE SAINT PETERSBURG GREY BELT Leonid Lavrov 1, Fedor Perov 2, Raffaele Gambassi 3 1,2 Saint Petersburg State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering Vtoraja Krasnoarmejskaja ul. 4, St. Petersburg, Russia 3 Via Salceto 87, Poggibonsi,Siena, Italy 1 [email protected], 2 [email protected] Abstract The study looks at the issues of the development of territories in the Obvodny Canal area. These issues, which are of great interest as related to the planned transformation of the Grey Belt, become more aggravated due to the increase in traffic load after the Western High-Speed Diameter (WHSD) opening. A significant decrease in the housing quality and cost of apartments facing embankments is observed, which can be explained by an extremely high level of noise and contamination with exhaust gases. Options for the improvement of environmental conditions, based on the conversion of territories allocated for the canal water area, are proposed. It is being noted that the Obvodny Canal has lost its functional purpose and can be converted as dozens of (nowadays former) canals in the historic center of Saint Petersburg. Keywords Grey Belt, Saint Petersburg transport infrastructure, Obvodny Canal, ecology of living environment. Introduction The canal was abandoned and for a long time it served The Obvodny Canal was constructed in 1803–1835. as a waste canal for local enterprises and residential In 1766, a drainage ditch was dug from the Ligovsky Ca- blocks. In the 1960s, a proposal to fill up the canal was nal to the Ekateringofka River; the western part of the Ob- debated.
    [Show full text]
  • Olympic Flame in St. Petersburg Monday, 21 October 2013 19:35
    Olympic Flame in St. Petersburg Monday, 21 October 2013 19:35 {joomplu:2610 left} Olympic Flame in St. Petersburg The Olympic flame will visit 125 cities in Russia, 14,000 athletes and 30,000 volunteers will take part in the relay. The torch will travel 65,000 kilometers, and will visit Lake Baikal under the night sky. The Olympic torch journey will end at the opening of the Winter Olympics in Sochi on February 7th, 2014 at the Fisht stadium. In the end of October, St. Petersburg will welcome the Olympic flame. We will explain to you the details and route the flame will take in St. Petersburg, so you can have the unique experience of seeing it in person. The Olympic flame will visit several areas of the city and will begin its journey from Victory Square (Ploshad Pobedy) and finish at Palace Square . In total, the city government will spend more than 36 million rubles for this celebration. Petersburg will be 33rd city which will hold the Olympic torch relay. The flame is a symbol of the Olympics and, will arrive in the northern capital on October 26th after a visit to Gatchina. St. Petersburg will turn into a big sport and music festival. The relay will start on Moskovsky Prospect to the Fontanka River. Next, the Olympic flame will go along the following path: Goroxovaya - Malaya Morskaya - St. Isaac's Square. Then go to Dekabristov – English embankment (Angliyskaya naberezhnaya) – Blagoveshensky Bridge- Lieutenant Schmidt Embankment - 18 and 19 line of Vasileostrovksaya – Bolshoi Prospect. 6th and 7th lines of Vasileostrovskaya - University Embankment – Strelka on Vasileostrovskaya - 1 / 3 Olympic Flame in St.
    [Show full text]
  • Agustin Betancourt in Russia1
    Q ’H ’E 2009 AGUSTIN BETANCOURT IN RUSSIA1 Vladimir E. Pavlov 1.- To the service of the Russian Crown2. Agustin Betancourt arrived for the first time in Russia in November 1807 and stayed there for several months, till April 1808. During this first stay he was presented to Alexandre I, charmed him as a person, pleased him as an engineer and got the invitation to enter the service of the Crown under very advanta- geous conditions (fig. 1). He also impressed the royal family, and namely the empress-mother Maria Fedorovna with whom he entertained a correspondence after his departure and whose benevolent atti- tude contributed greatly to concretise this opportunity. Thus, in her letter addressed to Betancourt in Paris, the royal Lady asked him not to postpone his coming to Russia that particularly influenced his decision. In his reply, dated June 22, 1808, Betancourt writes about his definitive decision and preparations for his journey3. The fact that Betancourt had given his prior agreement to Alexander I to turn to the service of Russia is evidenced by the Alexander I’s decree dated March 13, Figure 1. Alexandre I, emperor of Russia (1801-1825). Portrait 19th 1808, and addressed to the cabinet council century. “On the delivery of two thousand roubles 1 The author warmly thanks M. Bradley who kindly accepted to review the English version of this paper. 2 The author’s works on the subject, see: BOGOLÛBOV, A.; PAVLOV, V.; FILATOV N. (2002) Avgusin Betankur: 1758-1824: Učënyj, inžener, arhitektor, gradostroitel’, Nižnij Novgorod, Nižegorodskij gos. un-t; PAVLOV, V.E.
    [Show full text]
  • Essential Russia with Golden Ring 2020
    Essential Russia with Golden Ring 2020 A Private Historical and Cultural Tour of Moscow, the Golden Ring & St. Petersburg Featuring Extraordinary Experiences: VIP Visit to the dome of Christ the Holy Redeemer Cathedral Private Home Visit & Dinner with a Local Family in Suzdal VIP Entrance to Catherine Palace Amber Room Workshops at the Catherine Palace Private Neva Canal Cruise Itinerary at a Glance: Day 1 Arrive in Moscow Day 2 Moscow Day 3 Moscow Day 4 Moscow Day 5 Moscow - Golden Ring Day 6 Golden Ring Day 7 Golden Ring - St. Petersburg Day 8 St. Petersburg Day 9 St. Petersburg Day 10 St. Petersburg Day 11 St. Petersburg Day 12 Depart St. Petersburg Why Exeter International? Our Knowledge & Experience At Exeter International we have been creating memories and crafting custom-designed journeys for 27 years. We are a team of specialists committed to providing the best travel experiences in our destinations. Each of our experts has either travelled extensively on reconnaissance trips, or has lived in their area of expertise, giving us unparalleled first-hand knowledge. Because we focus on specific parts of the globe, we return to the same destinations many times, honing our experience over the years. Hand-Selected Guides We know that guides are one of the most important components of any travel experience. That is why we only use local experts who have a history of working with our guests and whom we know personally. We are extremely particular in selecting our guides and are confident that they will be one of the most memorable aspects of any of our trips.
    [Show full text]
  • Peter the Great and His Changing Identity Emily Frances Pagrabs Wofford College
    Wofford College Digital Commons @ Wofford Student Scholarship 5-2016 Peter the Great and His Changing Identity Emily Frances Pagrabs Wofford College Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.wofford.edu/studentpubs Part of the European History Commons, and the Slavic Languages and Societies Commons Recommended Citation Pagrabs, Emily Frances, "Peter the Great and His Changing Identity" (2016). Student Scholarship. Paper 17. http://digitalcommons.wofford.edu/studentpubs/17 This Honors Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ Wofford. It has been accepted for inclusion in Student Scholarship by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Wofford. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Peter the Great and His Changing Identity Senior History Honors Thesis May 11, 2016 Emiley Pagrabs Pagrabs 1 Introduction Well aware of the perception that foreigners held of him, Peter the Great would never apologize for his nationality or his country. A product of his upbringing, Peter did have some qualities that many foreigners criticized as barbaric and harsh. Said Peter: They say that I am cruel; that is what foreigners think of me, but who are they to judge? They do not know what the situation was at the beginning of my reign, and how many were opposed to my plans, and brought about the failure of projects which would have been of great benefit to my country obliging me to arm myself with great severity; but I have never been cruel…I have always asked for the cooperation of those of my subjects in whom I have perceived intelligence and patriotism, and who, agreeing with my views, were ready to support them.1 Essentially, Peter I was simply a Russian.
    [Show full text]
  • St Petersburg 8
    Plan Your Trip 12 ©Lonely Planet Publications Pty Ltd St Petersburg “All you’ve got to do is decide to go and the hardest part is over. So go!” TONY WHEELER, COFOUNDER – LONELY PLANET Regis St Louis, Simon Richmond Contents PlanPlan Your Your Trip Trip page 1 4 Welcome to Top Itineraries ���������������20 Travelling to Moscow ����36 St Petersburg ������������������ 4 If You Like� ����������������������22 Museums St Petersburg’s Month by Month ������������24 & Galleries �������������������37 Top 10 ������������������������������� 6 With Kids ������������������������26 Eating ���������������������������39 What’s New �������������������� 13 Money-Saving Tips �������28 Drinking Need to Know �����������������14 & Nightlife ������������������ 43 Visas �������������������������������29 First Time Entertainment ������������ 46 St Petersburg �����������������16 Tours & Activities �����������31 Shopping ��������������������� 48 Getting Around �������������� 18 Visiting on a Cruise �������34 Explore St Petersburg 50 Historic Heart ����������������54 Vasilyevsky Island ������� 143 Day Trips from Sennaya & Kolomna ���104 Petrograd & St Petersburg ������������ 173 Vyborg Sides ��������������� 154 Smolny & Sleeping ���������������������186 Vosstaniya ��������������������121 Understand St Petersburg 197 St Petersburg History ������������������������� 200 Arts �������������������������������226 Today ���������������������������� 198 Architecture ����������������� 219 Literature ���������������������236 Survival Guide 241 Transport ���������������������242
    [Show full text]
  • Representations of Antique Arms and Armour in the Architectural Decor of St. Petersburg
    HISTORIA I ŚWIAT, nr 6 (2017) ISSN 2299 - 2464 Sergey NIKONENKO (Saint Petersburg State University, Russia) Representations Of Antique Arms and Armour in the Architectural decor of St. Petersburg Keywords: Architectural décor, Helmets, Armour, Saint Petersburg, Classicism Saint Petersburg has been the capital of Russian empire in 1703 – 1917. It is one of the most beautiful cities all over the world with majestic architectural ensembles. This article is devoted to the representations of antique arms in St.Petersburg’s architectural décor. I want to add that this décor has not been studied completely. But I think that it is very useful to look at St.Petersburg’s military architectural décor as the kind of retrospective and academic style in new European arts. There are two historical periods in St.Petersburg’s architecture when architects and sculptors used ancient military décor. First of them is Classicism style (1770-1840). This is the time of constructing the main architectural ensembles and squares in the centre of St.Petersburg in so called “empire style”. Second of them is New Classicism style (1904-1916). It was the time of private buildings, especially of banks and dwelling houses. This article has two parts. In First part I propose the typology of buildings and architectural décor. Then I give the full list of St.Petersburg’s buildings with ancient military décor (compiled and published for the first time). In Second Part I will try to comment some main examples of ancient military décor. I. There are several kinds of images in ancient military décor: - Gods (Athena, Ares, Apollo, Hermes) - Heroes (Achilles, Ajax, etc.) - Emperors (Alexander the Great, Caesar, etc.) - Simple soldiers and horsemen.
    [Show full text]
  • The Siege of Leningrad (1941-1944)
    War fronts The siege of Leningrad (1941-1944) François-Xavier NÉRARD ABSTRACT Lasting 900 days between September 1941 and January 1944, the siege of Leningrad claimed the lives of 800,000 of the city’s inhabitants, mainly through cold and hunger. The population of the city was subjected, moreover, to enemy fire and to ruthlessly strict control by the Soviet authorities. The memory of the suffering of Leningrad’s population was first celebrated, then stifled, and is only gradually re-emerging. Tanya Savicheva's Diary The siege of Leningrad by German and Finnish forces (as well as the soldiers of the Division Azul, Spanish volunteers) is a key episode in the Second World War on Soviet territory and saw the reappearance of a form of warfare that was thought to have died out in the nineteenth century. Although less present in narratives of the war in the West, the siege was a major traumatic event for the USSR and Russia. As a symbol of resistance and suffering, it differs from Stalingrad, a heroic victory that could be celebrated more easily. Of Leningrad’s 2.5 million inhabitants on the eve of the conflict, only 600,000 were still alive in the city when it was liberated by the Red Army on 27 January 1944, around one million having been evacuated before and during the siege. It is estimated today that 800,000 people died in the siege, mostly from cold and hunger. Leningrad, along with Moscow and Kiev, was one of the major objectives of the German offensive launched on 21 June 1941, but the city was not taken during the attack.
    [Show full text]
  • Paper to the Early Plans of Petersburg
    Building space and myth at the edge of empire: Space Syntax analysis of St. Petersburg, 1703-19131 2 Kenneth J. Knoespel 17 Georgia Institute of Technology, USA Abstract: Keywords The foundation of St Petersburg in 1703 involves a tension between Scandinavian Constructing the “view” 17.1 of St. Petersburg, and Slavic identity. By reviewing grid maps over a period of time, it is possible to phenomenolog of men- create connections of authorial structures and show how they not only come into tal space, Space Syn- tension with mythologies being associated with the city but how they also continue tax and the Tartu School, narrative to generate a mythos for the city. Drawing on space syntax analysis of five stage of space, Dostoevsky and the evolution of the city, I show how the ongoing building of the city cannot be urban development separated from the construction of an evolving mental model of the city. The mythic [email protected] associations attributed to the city at her foundation stand in stark contrast to the ongoing problems of not only creating an idealized plan but in building a city that was rapidly becoming the major architectural and civil engineering project taking place in the north Introduction Approaches to the imperial city founded by Peter the Great on the Gulf of Finland in 1703 have often split the study of the urban plan between the highly developed mythos associated with the city and its actual construction. The repeated reference to the psychological force of the city so evident in work by Pushkin, Gogal, Dostoevsky, to mention only a few, stand in harsh contrast to the technical accounts of canal and bridge building, the city’s extension toward the Gulf of Finland, the building of the world’s deepest metro system, the industrialization of the city during the Soviet period, and the rebuilding of the city after its destruction in the Second World War.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Heritage, Cinema, and Identity by Kiun H
    Title Page Framing, Walking, and Reimagining Landscapes in a Post-Soviet St. Petersburg: Cultural Heritage, Cinema, and Identity by Kiun Hwang Undergraduate degree, Yonsei University, 2005 Master degree, Yonsei University, 2008 Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The Dietrich School of Arts and Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Pittsburgh 2019 Committee Page UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH DIETRICH SCHOOL OF ARTS AND SCIENCES This dissertation was presented by Kiun Hwang It was defended on November 8, 2019 and approved by David Birnbaum, Professor, University of Pittsburgh, Department of Slavic Languages and Literatures Mrinalini Rajagopalan, Associate Professor, University of Pittsburgh, Department of History of Art & Architecture Vladimir Padunov, Associate Professor, University of Pittsburgh, Department of Slavic Languages and Literatures Dissertation Advisor: Nancy Condee, Professor, University of Pittsburgh, Department of Slavic Languages and Literatures ii Copyright © by Kiun Hwang 2019 Abstract iii Framing, Walking, and Reimagining Landscapes in a Post-Soviet St. Petersburg: Cultural Heritage, Cinema, and Identity Kiun Hwang, PhD University of Pittsburgh, 2019 St. Petersburg’s image and identity have long been determined by its geographical location and socio-cultural foreignness. But St. Petersburg’s three centuries have matured its material authenticity, recognizable tableaux and unique urban narratives, chiefly the Petersburg Text. The three of these, intertwined in their formation and development, created a distinctive place-identity. The aura arising from this distinctiveness functioned as a marketable code not only for St. Petersburg’s heritage industry, but also for a future-oriented engagement with post-Soviet hypercapitalism. Reflecting on both up-to-date scholarship and the actual cityscapes themselves, my dissertation will focus on the imaginative landscapes in the historic center of St.
    [Show full text]