DOCSLIB.ORG

Handbook of Legal Procedures of Computer and Network Misuse in EU Countries

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

THE ARTS This PDF document was made available from www.rand.org as a public CHILD POLICY service of the RAND Corporation. CIVIL JUSTICE EDUCATION Jump down to document ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT 6 HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit research NATIONAL SECURITY POPULATION AND AGING organization providing objective analysis and effective PUBLIC SAFETY solutions that address the challenges facing the public SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY and private sectors around the world. SUBSTANCE ABUSE TERRORISM AND HOMELAND SECURITY TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE Support RAND WORKFORCE AND WORKPLACE Browse Books & Publications Make a charitable contribution For More Information Visit RAND at www.rand.org Explore RAND Europe View document details Limited Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law as indicated in a notice appearing later in this work. This electronic representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for non- commercial use only. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of our research documents for commercial use. This product is part of the RAND Corporation technical report series. Reports may include research findings on a specific topic that is limited in scope; present discus- sions of the methodology employed in research; provide literature reviews, survey instruments, modeling exercises, guidelines for practitioners and research profes- sionals, and supporting documentation; or deliver preliminary findings. All RAND reports undergo rigorous peer review to ensure that they meet high standards for re- search quality and objectivity. Handbook of Legal Procedures of Computer and Network Misuse in EU Countries Lorenzo Valeri, Geert Somers, Neil Robinson, Hans Graux, Jos Dumortier Prepared for the European Commission The research described in this report was prepared for the European Commission. The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit research organization providing objective analysis and effective solutions that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors around the world. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. R® is a registered trademark. © Copyright 2006 the European Commission All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form by any electronic or mechanical means (including photocopying, recording, or information storage and retrieval) without permission in writing from the copyright holder. Published 2006 by the RAND Corporation 1776 Main Street, P.O. Box 2138, Santa Monica, CA 90407-2138 1200 South Hayes Street, Arlington, VA 22202-5050 201 North Craig Street, Suite 202, Pittsburgh, PA 15213-1516 Newtonweg 1, 2333 CP Leiden, The Netherlands Westbrook Centre, Milton Road, Cambridge CB4 1YG, United Kingdom Uhlandstraße 14, 10623 Berlin, Germany RAND URL: http://www.rand.org/ RAND Europe URL: http://www.rand.org/randeurope To order RAND documents or to obtain additional information, contact Distribution Services: Telephone: (310) 451-7002; Fax: (310) 451-6915; Email: [email protected] Preface In 2003 the European Commission commissioned RAND Europe to develop a Handbook that provided an easy to use guide matching technical descriptions of incidents to the legal framework of the country in question, and detailed procedures for working with law enforcement to respond to incidents. This handbook was tailored to the user requirements of Europe’s Computer Security Incident Response Team (CSIRT) community. RAND Europe and Lawfort were invited to update this first version of the Handbook, to take into account the recent developments in the legal framework in the EU and more importantly, to extend its scope to cover the situation in the 10 new Member States which joined the European Union on 1st May 2004. The MODINIS work programme supports this activity under the heading of “favouring co-ordination between CSIRTs.” This project is also undertaken as a preparatory activity for the newly formed European Network and Information Security Agency (ENISA). This is the final report of the 2005 EC-CSIRT Legal Handbook of Legal Procedures of Computer and Network Misuse in EU Countries for Assisting Computer Security Incident Response Teams (CSIRTS): hereafter ‘2005 CSIRT Legal Handbook’. In detail, the CSIRT Legal Handbook provides user-friendly access to up to date information on rules and regulations concerning computer misuse and the collection and reporting of computer evidence currently in force in all 25 EU countries, together with guidelines as to when and how law enforcement must be informed of incidents. The project will update the taxonomy, review and analyse standard enquires and reporting needs, survey national legal frameworks and relevant industrial initiatives and provide a user friendly electronic application for modifying and updating the information. Project co-ordination and management, the user survey and design and implementation of the electronic applicaition was conducted by RAND Europe, an independent not-for- profit policy research organisation that serves the public interest by improving policymaking and informing public debate. Lawfort, a leading and independent Belgian law firm (www.lawfort.be) with offices Brussels, Antwerp, Ghent and Liège, conducted and managed the contributions of national legal correspondents across the EU under the leadership of Professor Jos Dumortier. These are detailed in the table below: ii RAND Europe Update to the Handbook of Legal Procedures of Computer and Network Misuse Member State Principal source(s) Austria Dr. Erich Schweighofer and Dr. Doris Liebwald, Wiener Zentrum für Rechtsinformatik, Universität Wien Belgium Prof Jos Dumortier, Geert Somers, Hans Graux, Lawfort Cyprus Olga Georgiades, Lawyer, Lellos P Demetriades Law Office Czech Jan Hobza, Sales Manager Siemens Business Services Ltd, and Kubo Macak, LL.M. Danmark Dr. Henrik Udsen, University of Copenhagen Estonia Tõnu Lausmaa, Re-En Center TAASEN Finland Kirsi Kankare, LL.M., Sourcing Manager Nokia Germany Marian Alexander Arning, LL.M. and Dr. Kai Cornelius, LL.M. Greece Konstantinos Kyrmanidis, Lawyer Hungary Dr. Koppányi Szabolcs, LL.M. Italy Paolo Galdieri, Lawyer Latvia Andris Kikans and Juris Breicis, Datorzinibu Centrs A/S Lithuania Mindaugas Civilka, Lawyer, Law Offices Norcous & Partners Malta Dr. Olga Finkel, Lawyer, Gatt Frendo Tufigno Advocates Poland Hon. Dariusz Sielicki, judge, legal expert for the Polish Ministry of Justice Portugal Pedro Simões Dias, Lawyer, Uría & Menéndez Lisboa Slovakia JUDr. Martin Lupták, Public Prosecutor and External Professor Univerzity Mateja Bela Slovenia Gorazd Božič, ARNES SI-CERT Spain Joaquín de Otaola, Lawyer, Sanchez Pintado, Núñez & Asociados, S.L. Sweden Patrik Håkansson, DCI / IT Crime Squad, National Criminal Police Sweden United Kingdom Peter Sommer, London School of Economics For more information this project please contact Dr Lorenzo Valeri, at the Information Society Programme, ([email protected]) at the following address: Dr Lorenzo Valeri Information Society Programme RAND Europe Westbrook Centre Milton Road Cambridge CB4 1YG UNITED KINGDOM [email protected] T: +44(0)1223 353329 iii Contents Preface.........................................................................................................................ii Executive Summary...................................................................................................10 Country Reports .......................................................................................................12 CHAPTER 1 Introduction to Country Reports...................................................13 1.1 Taxonomy of Information Security Incidents .................................................. 13 1.2 The Criminality of Incidents across the EU..................................................... 15 1.3 Matching incidents to the Framework Decision and Council of Europe Cyber-Crime Convention................................................................................ 18 CHAPTER 2 Country Report - Austria ...............................................................24 2.1 Austrian Legislation on Computer Crimes....................................................... 24 2.2 Law Enforcement Bodies................................................................................. 28 2.2.1 Police (www.polizei.gv.at)................................................................... 28 2.2.2 Austrian Administrative Adjudication................................................. 29 2.2.3 Austrian Criminal Proceedings ........................................................... 29 2.3 Reporting ........................................................................................................ 30 2.3.1 Competent Authorities ....................................................................... 30 2.3.2 Contact Details................................................................................... 30 2.4 Forensics ......................................................................................................... 31 2.5 References ....................................................................................................... 32 CHAPTER 3 Country Report: Belgium ..............................................................34 3.1 Belgian legislation on computer crimes............................................................ 34 3.2 Law enforcement bodies .................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Review of the Media Framing of Human Trafficking

    Review of the Media Framing of Human Trafficking

    Project acronym: TRACE Project title: Trafficking as A Criminal Enterprise Grant number: 607669 Programme: Seventh Framework Programme – Security Research Objective: SEC-2013.6.1-3 Contract type: Coordination and support action Start date of project: 01 May 2014 Duration: 24 months Website: www.trace-project.eu Deliverable D1.2: Review of the media framing of human trafficking Author(s): Julia Muraszkiewicz (Vrije Universiteit Brussel), Maria Georgiou and Angelos Constantinou (Cyprus Police) Dissemination level: Public Deliverable type: Final Version: 1 Submission date: 24 September 2014 1 Table of Contents Executive summary ................................................................................. 5! 1! Introduction ....................................................................................... 6! 2! Methodology ...................................................................................... 8! 3! Literature Review ............................................................................ 11! 4! The United Kingdom ........................................................................ 13! 4.1! Trafficking in human beings in the united kingdom ........................................................ 13! 4.2! The media in the united kingdom .................................................................................... 14! 4.3! Framing of human trafficking by the media .................................................................... 15! 4.3.1! Genesis .....................................................................................................................
  • Country Organisation Or Body Website Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates

    Country Organisation Or Body Website Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates

    Country Organisation or body Website Abu Dhabi Police www.adpolice.gov.ae/en/ Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates Albania Republic of Albania Applicants should apply for a Deshimi at the local Office of Juridical Ministry of Justice State or at: Zyra e Gjendjes Gjyqësore Buleavardi “Zogu I” Tirana, Albania Tel/fax: +355 4 228292 Argentina Ministerio de Justicia y www.dnrec.jus.gov.ar/Default.aspx For information on how to apply, visit the website of the Ministerio Derechos Humanos de Justicia y Derechos Humanos as listed. Australia Australian Federal www.afp.gov.au Complete the Australian Federal Police National Police Check (NPC) Police application form. Australian Federal Police Locked Bag 8550 Canberra City ACT 2601 Australia Residents Non-residents Austria Vienna Police An application for a Apply to an Austrian embassy or consulate Department – Criminal Criminal Records Check Records may be filed in Austria or contact: at police departments in main cities or at the Information Services Vienna Police mayor's office in Department – Criminal Records smaller towns/villages. ("Strafregisteramt") Wasagasse 22, A-1090 Vienna, Austria Email: bpdw.strafregisteramt(at)polizei.gv.at The Bahamas Royal Bahamas Police https://forms.bahamas.gov.bs Applicants should apply with passport details, place of residence in Force The Bahamas, one photograph and a certified set of fingerprints, and pay the applicable fees. Requests can be made online to the local police station or to: Officer in Charge, Criminal Records Office P.O. Box N 458 Nassau, Bahamas Belgium Embassy of Belgium in www.diplomatie.be/dublin/ Federal Public Service Justice Dublin Service du Casier Judiciaire Central 115 Waterloo Boulevard 1000 Brussels, Belgium Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] You may need a letter from the Teaching Council stating why the clearance is being requested.
  • Trafficking in Human Beings

    Trafficking in Human Beings

    TemaNord 2014:526 TemaNord Ved Stranden 18 DK-1061 Copenhagen K www.norden.org Trafficking in Human Beings Report from a conference on Identification of victims and criminals Trafficking in Human Beings – why we do not notice them In the Nordic countries, most of the reported cases of trafficking in human beings today concern women and girls trafficked for sexual exploitation, but experiences from Europe indicate that human trafficking has increased also in farming, household work, construction, and house building, as well as in begging, shoplifting and thefts. The conference Identification of victims and criminals – why we do not notice them on 30–31 May 2013 in Tallinn, Estonia formed the conclusion of a Nordic-Baltic-Northwest Russian cooperation project. Around 80 participants attended the two-day conference to discuss ways of identifying victims and criminals and to find answer to the question of why we do not notice victims or criminals, even though we now have available to us facts, figures, research and knowledge about human trafficking as a part of international organized crime. TemaNord 2014:526 ISBN 978-92-893-2767-1 ISBN 978-92-893-2768-8 (EPUB) ISSN 0908-6692 conference proceeding TN2014526 omslag.indd 1 09-04-2014 07:18:39 Trafficking in Human Beings Report from a conference on Identification of victims and criminals – why we do not notice them TemaNord 2014:526 Trafficking in Human Beings Report from a conference on Identification of victims and criminals - why we do not notice them ISBN 978-92-893-2767-1 ISBN 978-92-893-2768-8 (EPUB) http://dx.doi.org/10.6027/TN2014-526 TemaNord 2014:526 ISSN 0908-6692 © Nordic Council of Ministers 2014 Layout: Hanne Lebech Cover photo: Beate Nøsterud Photo: Reelika Riimand Print: Rosendahls-Schultz Grafisk Copies: 516 Printed in Denmark This publication has been published with financial support by the Nordic Council of Ministers.
  • Response of the Government of Cyprus to the Report of The

    Response of the Government of Cyprus to the Report of The

    CPT/Inf (2018) 17 Response of the Government of Cyprus to the report of the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) on its visit to Cyprus from 2 to 9 February 2017 The Government of Cyprus has requested the publication of this response. The CPT’s report on the February 2017 visit to Cyprus is set out in document CPT/Inf (2018) 16. Strasbourg, 26 April 2018 Response by the Government of Cyprus to the report on the visit of the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) to Cyprus (2 to 9 February 2017) The Republic of Cyprus welcomes the recommendations of the Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment. The competent authorities have carefully studied the recommendations, which will be duly considered in the efforts to improve the treatment of persons deprived of their liberty, with a view to strengthening, where necessary, the protection of such persons. Cyprus remains committed to its dialogue with the Committee for the prevention of torture and inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. I. INTRODUCTION D. National Preventive Mechanism Recommendation par. 9, page 10 -11 The CPT recommends that the Cypriot authorities significantly increase the resources allocated to the Office of the Ombudsman to enable it to carry out its NPM functions effectively, along with a dedicated and sufficient budget. Enhancing the capacity of the Office of the Ombudsman has been one of the priorities of the Cypriot authorities, who have sought external expertise on how best to proceed.
  • Border Management Reform in Transition Democracies

    Border Management Reform in Transition Democracies

    Border Management Reform in Transition Democracies Editors Aditya Batara G Beni Sukadis Contributors Pierre Aepli Colonel Rudito A.A. Banyu Perwita, PhD Zoltán Nagy Lieutenant-Colonel János Hegedűs First Edition, June 2007 Layout Front Cover Lebanese-Israeli Borders Downloaded from: www.michaelcotten.com Printed by Copyright DCAF & LESPERSSI, 2007 The Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces FOREWORD Suripto, SH Vice Chairman of 3rd Commission, Indonesian House of Representatives And Chariman of Lesperssi Founder Board Border issues have been one of the largest areas of concern for Indonesia. Since becoming a sovereign state 61 years ago, Indonesia is still facing a series of territorial border problems. Up until today, Indonesia has reached agreements with its neighbouring countries related to demarcation and state border delineation. However, the lack of an unequivocal authority for border management has left serious implications for the state’s sovereignty and its citizen’s security. The Indonesian border of today, is still having to deal with border crime, which includes the violation of the territorial border, smuggling and terrorist infiltration, illegal fishing, illegal logging and Human Rights violations. These kinds of violations have also made a serious impact on the state’s sovereignty and citizen’s security. As of today, Indonesia still has an ‘un-settled’ sea territory, with regard to the rights of sovereignty (Additional Zone, Economic Exclusive Zone, and continent plate). This frequently provokes conflict between the authorised sea-territory officer on patrol and foreign ships or fishermen from neighbouring countries. One of the principal border problems is the Sipadan-Ligitan dispute between Indonesia and Malaysia, which started in 1969.
  • Women in Police Services Eu 2012

    Women in Police Services Eu 2012

    WOMEN IN POLICE SERVICES IN THE EU FACTS AND FIGURES - 2012 © 2013 Institut for Public Security of Catalonia Ctra. C-17 Barcelona-Ripoll, km 13,5 08100 - Mollet del Vallès www.gencat.cat/interior/ispc Editor: Lola Vallès [email protected] Design: Conxita Gandia February 2013 Women in police services in the EU 2012 Summary Introduction.......................................................................................................................... 5 The researchers................................................................................................................. 7 Acknowledgements............................................................................................................ 7 The questionnaire .............................................................................................................. 9 Austria ................................................................................................................................ 11 Belgium .............................................................................................................................. 13 Cyprus ................................................................................................................................ 15 Denmark ............................................................................................................................. 17 England and Wales............................................................................................................ 19 Estonia...............................................................................................................................
  • Illicit Trafficking in Firearms, Their Parts, Components and Ammunition To, from and Across the European Union

    Illicit Trafficking in Firearms, Their Parts, Components and Ammunition To, from and Across the European Union

    Illicit Trafficking in Firearms, their Parts, Components and Ammunition to, from and across the European Union REGIONAL ANALYSIS REPORT 1 UNITED NATIONS OFFICE ON DRUGS AND CRIME Vienna Illicit Trafficking in Firearms, their Parts, Components and Ammunition to, from and across the European Union UNITED NATIONS Vienna, 2020 UNITED NATIONS OFFICE ON DRUGS AND CRIME Vienna Illicit Trafficking in Firearms, their Parts, Components and Ammunition to, from and across the European Union REGIONAL ANALYSIS REPORT UNITED NATIONS Vienna, 2020 © United Nations, 2020. All rights reserved, worldwide. This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission from the copy- right holder, provided acknowledgment of the source is made. UNODC would appreciate receiving a copy of any written output that uses this publication as a source at [email protected]. DISCLAIMERS This report was not formally edited. The contents of this publication do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of UNODC, nor do they imply any endorsement. Information on uniform resource locators and links to Internet sites contained in the present publication are provided for the convenience of the reader and are correct at the time of issuance. The United Nations takes no responsibility for the continued accuracy of that information or for the content of any external website. This document was produced with the financial support of the European Union. The views expressed herein can in no way be taken to reflect
  • EDU Letter Template

    EDU Letter Template

    Europol Public Information Management Board Membership September 2017 Chairperson Mr Priit Pärkna Intelligence Management and Investigation Estonian Police and Border Guard Board Member State MB member Department/Agency/Ministry Alternate MB member Department/Agency/Ministry Austria Ms Regine International Police Cooperation - Mr Christian Wandl International Police Cooperation Wieselthaler- Federal Police Ministry of Interior Buchmann Ministry of Interior Belgium Mr Peter De International Police Cooperation - Mr Frederik Van Oost International Police Cooperation - Buysscher Federal Police Federal Police Ministry of Interior Ministry of Interior Bulgaria Mr Valentin International Operational Cooperation Ms Kremena Peneva Head of LB Bulgaria Vasilev Kostov Directorate Platikanova-Nenova Ministry of Interior Croatia Mr Ante Orlović Criminal Police Directorate Mr Dalibor Jurić Sector for Criminal Police Support Cyprus Mr Demetris European Union and International Ms Maria Charalambous European Union and International Demetriou Police Cooperation Directorate Police Cooperation Directorate Czech Republic Ms Šárka International Police Cooperation - Mr Václav Rukner International Police Cooperation - Havránková Police Presidium Police Presidium Ministry of Interior Ministry of Interior Estonia Mr Ivo Kolk Head of Intelligence Management Ms Mirja Virve Estonian Liaison Bureau Bureau Police and Border Guard Board Finland Mr Timo Antero National Police Board Ms Marja Kartila National Police Board Saarinen Ministry of Interior Ministry of Interior
  • Page 621 TITLE 18—CRIMES and CRIMINAL PROCEDURE § 2725

    Page 621 TITLE 18—CRIMES and CRIMINAL PROCEDURE § 2725

    Page 621 TITLE 18—CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE § 2725 (1) ‘‘motor vehicle record’’ means any record 227. Sentences .............................................. 3551 that pertains to a motor vehicle operator’s 228. Death sentence .................................... 3591 permit, motor vehicle title, motor vehicle reg- 228A. Post-conviction DNA testing ............ 3600 istration, or identification card issued by a de- 229. Post-Sentence Administration 2 ....... 3601 partment of motor vehicles; [231. Repealed.] (2) ‘‘person’’ means an individual, organiza- 232. Miscellaneous Sentencing Provi- tion or entity, but does not include a State or sions 1 .................................................. 3661 agency thereof; 232A. Special forfeiture of collateral (3) ‘‘personal information’’ means informa- profits of crime ................................ 3681 tion that identifies an individual, including an 233. Contempts ............................................. 3691 individual’s photograph, social security num- 235. Appeal .................................................... 3731 ber, driver identification number, name, ad- 237. Crime victims’ rights .......................... 3771 dress (but not the 5-digit zip code), telephone AMENDMENTS number, and medical or disability informa- tion, but does not include information on ve- 2006—Pub. L. 109–164, title I, § 103(a)(2), Jan. 10, 2006, hicular accidents, driving violations, and driv- 119 Stat. 3563, added item for chapter 212A. 2004—Pub. L. 108–405, title I, § 102(b), title IV, 1 er’s status. § 411(a)(2), Oct. 30, 2004, 118 Stat. 2264, 2284, added items (4) ‘‘highly restricted personal information’’ for chapters 228A and 237. means an individual’s photograph or image, 2000—Pub. L. 106–523, § 2(b), Nov. 22, 2000, 114 Stat. social security number, medical or disability 2492, added item for chapter 212. information; and 1994—Pub. L. 103–359, title VIII, § 803(c)(1), Oct.
  • Police Service Strength England and Wales, 31 March 2006

    Police Service Strength England and Wales, 31 March 2006

    Home Office StatisticalBulletin Police Service Strength 13/06 England and Wales, 31 March 2006 Michelle Clegg and Sarah Kirwan 26 July 2006 The Research, Development and Statistics Directorate exists MAIN POINTS to improve policy making, decision taking and practice • There were 143, 271 full-time equivalent police officers in England and Wales in support of the Home Office as at 31 March 2006. This is an increase of 387, or less than one per cent purpose and aims, to provide compared to a year earlier. the public and Parliament with information necessar y for • This total includes 1,748 officers seconded to the National Crime Squad informed debate and to (NCS), National Criminal Intelligence Service (NCIS) and Central Services. publish information for future NCS and NCIS became part of the Serious Organised Crime Agency (SOCA) use. on 1 April 2006. • There were 5,297 minority ethnic officers, 3.7 per cent of the total police strength, compared with 3.5 per cent on 31 March 2005. Statistical Bulletins are produced by the Research, • The police officer strength figure for 31 March 2006, calculated on the old Development and Statistics basis which excludes those on career breaks or maternity/paternity leave and Directorate. For further copies is comparable with figures prior to March 2003, was 141,381 (see text box on contact: page 3 for further explanation). • The total number of police community support officers in the 43 police forces www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds in England and Wales was 6,769, up nine per cent on the previous year. Figure 1: Total police officer strength (full-time equivalents), Change in number of officers from the previous year 7,000 6,136 6,000 4,847 5,000 3,921 4,000 3,000 2,298 2,000 1,512 1,000 257 387 0 -1,000 -344 -718 -2,000 -1,926 © Crown Copyright 2006 -3,000 ISSN 1358-510X 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Year to March Note: Since March 2003 total police officer strength has included those officers on career breaks or maternity/paternity leave.
  • WCO Compendium on Gender Equality and Diversity in Customs

    WCO Compendium on Gender Equality and Diversity in Customs

    COMPENDIUM Gender Equality and Diversity in Customs 2020 wcoomd.org Supported by COMPENDIUM Gender Equality and Diversity in Customs 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS 6 FOREWORD The broad scope of examples collected illustrates the diverse 8 INTRODUCTION Membership of the WCO and 10 AUSTRALIAN BORDER FORCE demonstrates that there is no 14 FEDERAL REVENUE OF BRAZIL “one model that fits all”. 18 FINNISH CUSTOMS 22 ICELAND CUSTOMS 26 CENTRAL BOARD OF INDIRECT TAXES AND CUSTOMS OF INDIA 30 INDONESIA CUSTOMS 36 ISRAEL CUSTOMS 42 JAMAICA CUSTOMS 46 MALI CUSTOMS 50 NEW ZEALAND CUSTOMS 58 PHILIPPINES CUSTOMS 62 SOUTH AFRICAN REVENUE SERVICE 66 SWEDISH CUSTOMS 70 UGANDA REVENUE AUTHORITY 74 HER MAJESTY’S REVENUE AND CUSTOMS OF THE UNITED KINGDOM 80 UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION 86 VIETNAM CUSTOMS 4 COMPENDIUM | Gender Equality and Diversity in Customs COMPENDIUM | Gender Equality and Diversity in Customs 5 FOREWORD I am very pleased to present the WCO’s first edition of the Compendium on Gender Equality and Diversity in Customs. Gender Equality and Diversity is not only a question of human rights, but also considered a “Gender Equality and prerequisite for achieving sustainable development, growth and competitiveness. The WCO Secretariat therefore incorporates these issues as an integrated part of its capacity building agenda Diversity is not only a in order to enhance the overall performance of Customs administrations. Acknowledging that gender equality and diversity are important cross-cutting issues, the WCO recommends adopting a holistic approach and encourages its Members to consider gender and question of human rights, inclusiveness both in internal policies (including human resource management, leadership and career development) as well as external policies (stakeholder collaboration and at the border).
  • Message Exchange with Finnish Customs

    Message Exchange with Finnish Customs

    Message exchange with Finnish Customs Introduction to message exchange with Finnish Customs 22 April 2020 Contents 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 3 2 Electronic services of Finnish Customs ................................................................................ 3 2.1 The electronic service channels ........................................................................................................... 3 2.2 Factors affecting the choice of service channel ...................................................................................... 5 3 Message exchange ................................................................................................. 7 3.1 Direct message exchange (web service) ................................................................................................ 7 3.1.1 Message content ............................................................................................ 8 3.1.2 Operations and process when not using the Message Notification Service .............................. 8 3.1.3 Operations and process when using the Message Notification Service .................................. 9 3.1.4 Operations and process when using the attachment file message service ............................. 11 3.1.5 Operations and process when documents are retrieved from Customs’ new customs clearance system (UTU) applications ..........................................................................................