DOCSLIB.ORG

Programme Group Programme CL – Climate: Past, Present, Future

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Programme Group Programme CL – Climate: Past, Present, Future EGU General Assembly 2012 EGU General Assembly 2012 Programme Group Programme CL – Climate: Past, Present, Future Monday, 23 April ........................................................................................................................................................................ 3 AS1.10 ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 AS1.14 ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 CL0 ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 CL1.1 ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 8 CL1.2 ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 9 CL1.8 ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 10 CL1.14 ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 12 CL1.15 ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 13 CL5.1/GM2.5 ............................................................................................................................................................................ 15 NP8.1/CL5.2 ............................................................................................................................................................................. 18 CL5.3/HS6.7 ............................................................................................................................................................................. 19 SC4/CL5.17 ............................................................................................................................................................................. 21 SSP1.2 .................................................................................................................................................................................... 22 SSP4.2 .................................................................................................................................................................................... 22 Tuesday, 24 April ..................................................................................................................................................................... 25 CL1.13 ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 25 CL1.16/AS4.1/BG2.12/IG15 ....................................................................................................................................................... 28 CL1.17/EG1 ............................................................................................................................................................................. 29 CL2.1 ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 31 NH1.11/AS4.16/CL2.4 ............................................................................................................................................................... 33 CL2.5 ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 35 CR1.40/CL2.11 ......................................................................................................................................................................... 36 CL5.4/NP4.5 ............................................................................................................................................................................. 39 NP2.4/CL5.5 ............................................................................................................................................................................. 40 CL5.11 ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 41 CR10.10 .................................................................................................................................................................................. 43 GM9.2 ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 44 SSP4.1 .................................................................................................................................................................................... 46 SSS7.5 .................................................................................................................................................................................... 47 Wednesday, 25 April ................................................................................................................................................................ 51 CL2.8/AS1.13/ST6.5 .................................................................................................................................................................. 51 CL3.1 ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 54 CL3.3/NP5.4 ............................................................................................................................................................................. 56 CL4.3 ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 59 CL4.10 ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 62 CL5.7/AS4.22/BG6.4/GM2.6 ....................................................................................................................................................... 64 IG5/CL5.8/SSP5.3 ..................................................................................................................................................................... 65 GM4.2 ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 67 GM4.3 ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 68 HS2.13 .................................................................................................................................................................................... 69 NP2.1 ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 72 Thursday, 26 April .................................................................................................................................................................... 74 BG6.2 ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 74 CL1.5 ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 76 CL1.10 ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 77 CL2.3 ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 79 AS4.5/BG2.17/CL2.6 ................................................................................................................................................................. 81 CL2.7 ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 82 HS7.3/CL2.9/NP1.3 ................................................................................................................................................................... 84 HS7.4/AS4.17/CL2.10
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Exceptionally Well-Preserved Fossils in a Middle Ordovician Impact Crater
    Downloaded from http://jgs.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on September 29, 2021 Review focus Journal of the Geological Society Published Online First https://doi.org/10.1144/jgs2018-101 The Winneshiek biota: exceptionally well-preserved fossils in a Middle Ordovician impact crater Derek E.G. Briggs1,2*, Huaibao P. Liu3, Robert M. McKay3 & Brian J. Witzke4 1 Department of Geology and Geophysics, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, USA 2 Yale Peabody Museum of Natural History, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, USA 3 Iowa Geological Survey, IIHR – Hydroscience & Engineering, University of Iowa, 340 Trowbridge Hall, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA 4 Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Iowa, 115 Trowbridge Hall, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA D.E.G.B., 0000-0003-0649-6417 * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: The Winneshiek Shale (Middle Ordovician, Darriwilian) was deposited in a meteorite crater, the Decorah impact structure, in NE Iowa. This crater is 5.6 km in diameter and penetrates Cambrian and Ordovician cratonic strata. It was probably situated close to land in an embayment connected to the epicontinental sea; typical shelly marine taxa are absent. The Konservat-Lagerstätte within the Winneshiek Shale is important because it represents an interval when exceptional preservation is rare. The biota includes the earliest eurypterid, a giant form, as well as a new basal chelicerate and the earliest ceratiocarid phyllocarid. Conodonts, some of giant size, occur as bedding plane assemblages. Bromalites and rarer elements, including a linguloid brachiopod and a probable jawless fish, are also present. Similar fossils occur in the coeval Ames impact structure in Oklahoma, demonstrating that meteorite craters represent a novel and under-recognized setting for Konservat- Lagerstätten.
    [Show full text]
  • Magyar Királyi Földtani Intézet (2006.)
    ' Copyright Magyar `llami Fldtani IntØzet (Geological Institute of Hungary), 2005 Minden jog fenntartva! All rights reserved! Lektorok Reviewers: BALLA ZOLTÁN, CSÁSZÁRGZA, HAAS JÁNOS, HORVÁTH ISTVÁN, JÁMBOR Á RON, KOVÁCS SÁNDOR, KUBOVICS IMRE, LESS GYRGY, LIEBE PÁL,VICZIÁN ISTVÁN Sorozatszerkesztı Serial editor: BALLA ZOLTÁN Szakszerkesztı Scientific editor: PIROS OLGA Mßszaki szerkesztı Technical editor: SIMONYI DEZS SzÆmtgØpes nyomdai elıkØsztØs DTP: PIROS OLGA, SIMONYI DEZS Bortterv Cover design: SIMONYI DEZS Kiadja a Magyar `llami Fldtani IntØzet Published by the Geological Institute of Hungary Felelıs kiad Responsible editor: KORDOS L`SZL Igazgat Director HU ISSN 03689751 3 Tartalom — Contents Működési jelentés — Activity Report HÁMOR GÉZA (1934–2007) . 7 JÁMBOR ÁRON (összeállító): Dr. Hámor Géza szakirodalmi munkássága . 8 KORDOS LÁSZLÓ: A múlt a jövő kulcsa . 17 BREZSNYÁNSZKY KÁROLY: Igazgatói beszámoló a Magyar Állami Földtani Intézet 2006. évi tevékenységéről . 19 Szakcikkek — Scientific publications RIPSZNÉ JUDIK KATALIN: A Medvednica hegység (Horvátország) és Észak-Magyarország paleozoos és mezozoos kishőmérsékletű metamorf képződményeinek összevetése. — Comparison of Palaeozoic and Mesozoic very low- grade metamorphic formations in the Medvednica Mts (Croatia) and in North Hungary. 47 PELIKÁN PÁL, IVAN FILIPOVIĆ, DIVNA JOVANOVIĆ, MILAN SUDAR, †LJUBINKO PROTIĆ, HIPS KINGA, KOVÁCS SÁNDOR, LESS GYÖRGY: A Bükki-terrénum (É-Magyarország), a Jadari-terrénum (ÉNy-Szerbia) és a Sana-Unai-terrénum (ÉNy-Bosznia) karbon, perm és triász rétegsorainak összehasonlítása. — Correlation of the Carboniferous, Permian and Triassic sequences of the Bükk, Jadar, Sana-Una terrains. 59 BUDAI TAMÁS: Platformok és medencék kialakulása és fejlődése a Bakony középső-triász története során. — Middle Triassic platform and basin evolution of the Bakony Mts, Hungary. 77 HAAS JÁNOS: A bükki és a darnói jura képződmények ősföldrajzi helyzete és kapcsolatai.
    [Show full text]
  • Scientific Drilling of the Boltysh Impact Crater, Ukraine
    40th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference (2009) 1719.pdf SCIENTIFIC DRILLING OF THE BOLTYSH IMPACT CRATER, UKRAINE. J.S. Watson12, I. Gilmour1, S.P. Kelley2 and D.W. Jolley3. 1Planetary and Space Sciences Research Institute, The Open University, Milton Keynes, MK7 6AA, UK, 2Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, The Open University, Milton Keynes, MK7 6AA, UK, 3Department of Geology and Petroleum Geology, University of Aberdeen, AB24 3UE, UK. Introduction: The Boltysh crater has been known span a period of up to 10Ma and contain occasional for several decades and was first drilled in the 1960s as macrofossils, including ostracods, fish and plant fos- part of a study of economic oil shale deposits. Unfor- sils. Preliminary palynological studies suggest that tunately, the cores were not curated and have been lost. initial sedimentation rates in the crater following the We have re-drilled the impact crater and have recov- impact may have been low followed by more rapid ered a near continuous record of ~400 m of organic- sedimentation through the Late Paleocene. rich sediments together with 15 m of suevite. The Boltysh crater: The Boltysh impact crater, cen- tred at 48°54’N and 32°15’E, is a complex impact structure formed on the crystalline basement rocks of the Ukrainian shield, which comprise porphyroblastic granites (age ca. 1.55 Ga) and biotite gneissses (age ca. 1.85 – 2.22 Ga) [1]. The structure is covered by Qua- ternary sediments and has been dated at 65.17±0.64 Ma [1]. At 24km diameter, the impact is unlikely to have contributed substantially to the worldwide deva- station at the end of the Cretaceous.
    [Show full text]
  • Magyar Királyi Földtani Intézet (2006.)
    A Magyar Állami Földtani Intézet Évi Jelentése, 2006 Meteoritkráter-tanulmányok Impact crater studies DON GYÖRGY, SOLT PÉTER Magyar Állami Földtani Intézet, H–1143 Budapest, Stefánia út 14. Tárgyszavak: meteoritkráter, szferula-szintek, Magyarmecske-anomália Összefoglalás Korábbi kutatásainkban különböző korú (perm–triász, késő-eocén, pleisztocén stb.) földtani képződményekben mutattunk ki kozmikus mikroszferula-dúsulásokat és meteorithullás-rekonstrukciót végeztünk a szórási mező szferula-eloszlása alapján. Jelen tanulmányban röviden tár- gyaljuk a meteoritkráterek geomorfológiai, kőzettani, ásványtani és geofizikai jellemzőit. A hazai impakt kráterek kutatásának története a kezde- tektől napjainkig. Eddig a feltételezett meteoritkráterek közül csak a magyarmecskei, geofizikai anomáliával kimutatott földtani szerkezet kozmikus eredete valószínű. A földtörténet során képződött nagyobb kráterek kiszórt anyaga a magyarországi földtani képződményekben is meg- található. Végül bemutatunk néhány észtországi, németországi és ukrajnai meteoritkrátert, melyeknél terepbejárás során összehasonlitó kőzetmintákat gyűjtöttünk. Keywords: impact crater, spherule-horizons, Magyarmecske-anomaly Abstract Former studies of the authors focused on cosmic spherule occurrences in the geological record, and meteorite fall reconstructions. We introduce the characteristic features (geomorphology, petrography, mineralogy, geophysics) and short description of impact cratering events. History of impact crater research in Hungary, buried crater in Magyarmecske detected
    [Show full text]
  • Yaxcopoil-1 and the Chicxulub Impact
    Int J Earth Sci (Geol Rundsch) (2004) 93: 1042–1065 First published in: DOI 10.1007/s00531-004-0431-6 ORIGINAL PAPER Wolfgang Stinnesbeck Æ Gerta Keller Æ Thierry Adatte Markus Harting Æ Doris Stu¨ben Æ Georg Istrate Utz Kramar Yaxcopoil-1 and the Chicxulub impact Received: 28 August 2003 / Accepted: 11 July 2004 / Published online: 29 October 2004 Ó Springer-Verlag 2004 Abstract CSDP core Yaxcopoil-1 was drilled to a depth Cenomanian organic-rich marly limestone. There is no of 1,511 m within the Chicxulub crater. An organic-rich evidence that these sediments represent crater infill due marly limestone near the base of the hole (1,495 to to megablocks sliding into the crater, such as major 1,452 m) was deposited in an open marine shelf envi- disruption of sediments, chaotic changes in lithology, ronment during the latest Cenomanian (uppermost overturned or deep dipping megablocks, major Rotalipora cushmani zone). The overlying sequence of mechanical fragmentation, shock or thermal alteration, limestones, dolomites and anhydrites (1,495 to 894 m) or ductile deformation. Breccia units that are interca- indicates deposition in various carbonate platform lated in the carbonate platform sequence are intrafor- environments (e.g., sabkhas, lagoons). A 100-m-thick mational in origin (e.g., dissolution of evaporites) and suevite breccia (894–794 m) identifies the Chicxulub dykes are rare. Major disturbances of strata by the im- impact event. Above the suevite breccia is a dolomitic pact therefore appear to have been confined to within limestone with planktic foraminiferal assemblages less than 60 km from the proposed impact center.
    [Show full text]
  • The Boltysh Impact Crater, Ukraine: Smectites from the Crater-Fill Suevites
    EPSC Abstracts Vol. 8, EPSC2013-305, 2013 European Planetary Science Congress 2013 EEuropeaPn PlanetarSy Science CCongress c Author(s) 2013 The Boltysh Impact Crater, Ukraine: Smectites from the Crater-fill Suevites. F. A. Williams1*, S. P. Kelley1, I. Gilmour1, D. W. Jolley2 and M. Gilmour1. 1Department of Physical Sciences, Open University, Milton Keynes, UK. 2Department of Geology and Petroleum Geology, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK. *Corresponding author (email: [email protected]). Abstract equation [5]. δ18O becomes lighter and δD heavier, from the surficial suevites to the crater-fill suevites, The Boltysh crater has an entire suite of crater-fill reflecting a change from low-temperature weathering impactites preserved, including two impact melt- by meteoric water to hydrothermally-derived bearing breccias. Smectite occurrence in the breccias smectites. [6]. A similar method is currently being suggests two stages of alteration; an early applied to Boltysh crater-fill suevites. hydrothermal mineralization, and a later, low temperature weathering. δD and δ18O of smectite separates are currently being measured and will be 2. Methods presented. Samples of “suevite” and impact melt rock (IMR) 1. Introduction were collected from borehole core 42/11. Polished thin sections were prepared for use in an FEI Quanta Large impact events are capable of generating a 2003D SEM. Smectite composition was analysed hydrothermal system in water- or ice-rich targets [1]. with an Oxford Instrument EDS, and BSE imaging The potential significance of these hydrothermal was used to observe textures. Smectites were systems as habitats is dependent on their longevity separated by sieving and filtering using a Büchner and the continued availability of liquid H2O and funnel to obtain at <10 µm size fraction.
    [Show full text]
  • Giant Comets and Mass Extinctions of Life
    Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 000, ?? – ?? (2015) Printed 17 March 2015 (MN LATEX style file v2.2) Giant comets and mass extinctions of life W.M. Napier1⋆ 1Buckingham Centre for Astrobiology, University of Buckingham, Buckingham MK18 1EG, UK Accepted 2014 December 16. Received 2014 December 12; in original form 2014 March 31 ABSTRACT I find evidence for clustering in age of well-dated impact craters over the last 500 Myr. At least nine impact episodes are identified, with durations whose upper limits are set by the dating accuracy of the craters. Their amplitudes and frequency are inconsis- tent with an origin in asteroid breakups or Oort cloud disturbances, but are consistent with the arrival and disintegration in near-Earth orbits of rare, giant comets, mainly in transit from the Centaur population into the Jupiter family and Encke regions. About 1 in 10 Centaurs in Chiron-like orbits enter Earth-crossing epochs, usually repeatedly, each such epoch being generally of a few thousand years duration. On time-scales of geological interest, debris from their breakup may increase the mass of the near-Earth interplanetary environment by two or three orders of magnitude, yielding repeated episodes of bombardment and stratospheric dusting. I find a strong correlation between these bombardment episodes and major biostratigraphic and geo- logical boundaries, and propose that episodes of extinction are most effectively driven by prolonged encounters with meteoroid streams during bombardment episodes. Pos- sible mechanisms are discussed. Key words: comets: general - interplanetary medium - meteorites, meteors, mete- oroids - zodiacal dust 1 INTRODUCTION tention has been paid to the issue of episodes of bombard- ment, although several such have been noted and claims The discovery of an excess of iridium at the Cretaceous- have been made of correlation with mass extinction (Keller Tertiary boundary of 65 Myr BP, and its interpretation as et al 2012; McGhee 1996).
    [Show full text]
  • Shiva Structure: a Possible KT Boundary Impact Crater on the Western Shelf of India
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228719850 Shiva structure: a possible KT boundary impact crater on the western shelf of India Article · January 2006 CITATIONS READS 28 6,474 4 authors, including: Sankar Chatterjee Aaron Yoshinobu Texas Tech University Texas Tech University 101 PUBLICATIONS 3,108 CITATIONS 48 PUBLICATIONS 1,292 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Origin of Life View project All content following this page was uploaded by Sankar Chatterjee on 21 May 2014. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. SHIVA STRUCTURE: A POSSIBLE KT BOUNDARY IMPACT CRATER ON THE WESTERN SHELF OF INDIA SANKAR CHATTERJEE, NECIP GUVEN, AARON YOSHINOBU, AND RICHARD DONOFRIO ABSTRACT Evidence is accumulating for multiple impacts across the Cretaceous-Tertiary transition, such as the Chicxulub crater in Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico, the Shiva crater offshore western India, and the much smaller Boltysh crater in Ukraine. Among these, the submerged Shiva crater on the Mumbai Offshore Basin on the western shelf of India is the largest (~500 km diameter), which is covered by 7-km-thick strata of Cenozoic sediments. It is a complex peak ring crater with a multiring basin, showing a structural relief of 7 km. A ring of peak is surrounded by an annular trough, which is bounded by a collapsed outer rim. Four different ring structures have been identified: an inner ring (peak ring) with a diameter of 200 km, a second 250-km-ring, a third ring (final crater rim) of about 500 km, and a probable exterior elevated ring of about 550 km.
    [Show full text]
  • Precise Dating Technique Shows Boltysh Impact Not Involved in Dinosaur Extinction 21 June 2021, by Bob Yirka
    Precise dating technique shows Boltysh impact not involved in dinosaur extinction 21 June 2021, by Bob Yirka asteroid strike approximately 2,000 to 5,000 years before the Chicxulub impact event, which occurred approximately 65 million years ago. Because of their close proximity in time, some had suggested that the dinosaur extinction might have been due to a one-two punch of two massive asteroids colliding with the earth. In this new effort, the researchers have used a more precise dating technique to learn more about the date when the Boltysh crater was formed. The dating effort involved collecting sediment from the impact site that had landed there after the asteroid hit. Prior research had shown that such sediment is made of melted rock debris from the impact that had been covered over with soil over the years. To reach the sediment they were after, the researchers had to drill down to it. They then used their dating technique—called argon-argon geochronology—to measure isotopes of argon in the sediment. It showed the crater to be approximately 65.39 million years old. The team also analyzed grains of sanidine from a coal layer in Montana to measure the time difference between the two impacts. They note that the new technology they used to measure their samples were four times Transmitted light photomicrographs of impact melt rocks more precise than instruments used over the past used in this work. Credit: Science Advances (2021). few decades. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abe6530 The work by showed that the Boltysh impact was not part of a one-two punch pushing the dinosaurs to extinction—it came almost 1 million years later—far A team of researchers affiliated with several too late to kill the dinosaurs; they were all gone by institutions in the U.K.
    [Show full text]
  • Biostratigraphic Indications of End Cretaceous Age Of
    Lunar and Planetary Science XXXIV (2003) 1048.pdf BIOSTRATIGRAPHIC INDICATIONS OF END CRETACEOUS AGE OF THE BOLTYSH IMPACT CRATER (UKRAINIAN SHIELD) Anton Valter1 and Ludmila Plotnikova2 1Institute of Applied Physics of National Academy of Science, Department N 50, Nauki Avenue 46, Kiev 39, 03650, Ukraine ([email protected]) 2Institute of Geological Sciences of National Academy of Science,55B Gonchara str., Kiev 54, 01601, Ukraine ([email protected]) The Boltysh meteorite crater (diameter ≈ 23 km) on matherial. Among fragments are a minor amount the Ukrainian shield (Fig.1) was formed in (near 1%) of sedimentary rocks such as Precambrian (~ 2,1 Ga) granites and has a classical carboniferous sandstones, siltstones, cherts as well as complex structure. The geological setting of it have glassy impactites. been studied in many rorks which were summarized In two analyzed fragments from outcrops of the by V.L.Masaitis [1]. The annular trough around upper layers of the breccia the foramenifera central uplift (average diameter ~ 4km) is filled with Stensioeina emscherica Baryschn., Anomalina predominantly glassy impactites (tagamites) to 230 m infrasantonica Balakhm, were determined by L. thick. The crater lake sediments overlie impactites Plotnikova as well as by S. Lulieva the complex of and are represented by laminated siltstones, nannoplankton CC15 [7] zone Lucianohabdulus sandstones, claystones. They have nearly 400 m thick cayexi. This confirms a late Coniacian age of the in the central crater area. rocks of these fragments. The data about the geological age of lower crater We assume that if any later sediments were existed in sediments were contradictory (K1-P2) as well as the moment of the impact event, it could have been results of early K-Ar whole rock age determinations washed off during catastrophic displacements of of tagamites ( 177-64 Ma) [2].
    [Show full text]
  • Author's Personal Copy
    Author's personal copy J Archaeol Method Theory (2014) 21:134–211 DOI 10.1007/s10816-012-9149-0 The Archaeology of Cosmic Impact: Lessons from Two Mid-Holocene Argentine Case Studies Gustavo Barrientos & W. Bruce Masse Published online: 15 September 2012 # Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012 Abstract Cosmic impact is a category of natural catastrophe neglected or misunderstood by most archaeologists in reconstructions of past human population dynamics. We discuss the nature of impact by asteroids and comets and what is known and theorized about the Quaternary Period impact record. As case studies for our exploration of how archaeolog- ical method and theory can be productively applied to the study of cosmic impact, we focus on two confirmed Holocene asteroid impacts in central and northeastern Argentina, Rio Cuarto and Campo del Cielo, both likely dating between 6 and 3 cal ky BP. We model and assess the potential destructive effects of these impacts on contemporary hunting and gathering populations using several lines of evidence. The search for Quaternary Period cosmic impacts, along with the documentation of the effects of confirmed cosmic impacts on human populations, particularly of those organized in small-scale social groups, represents a challenge and key opportunity for future archaeological research. Keywords Extraterrestrial object collisions . Quaternary Period . Archaeological evidence and judgment criteria . Campo del Cielo and Río Cuarto impact events Introduction “Impact cratering is the most fundamental geologic process in the Solar System” (Melosh 2011:222). G. Barrientos Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo, Universidad Nacional del La Plata, Paseo del Bosque s/n, B1900FWA, La Plata, Argentina e-mail: [email protected] G.
    [Show full text]
  • Sedimentologia E Quimioestratigrafia Isotópica De Carbono E Oxigênio Da Transição Cretáceo – Paleógeno Em Rochas Carbonáticas, Bacia Da Paraíba, Nordeste Do Brasil
    UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE PERNAMBUCO CENTRO DE TECNOLOGIA E GEOCIÊNCIAS PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM GEOCIÊNCIAS Maria Valberlândia do Nascimento Silva SEDIMENTOLOGIA E QUIMIOESTRATIGRAFIA ISOTÓPICA DE CARBONO E OXIGÊNIO DA TRANSIÇÃO CRETÁCEO – PALEÓGENO EM ROCHAS CARBONÁTICAS, BACIA DA PARAÍBA, NORDESTE DO BRASIL Tese de Doutorado 2011 MARIA VALBERLÂNDIA DO NASCIMENTO SILVA Geógrafa, Universidade Estadual do Ceará, 2002 Mestre em Geologia, Universidade Federal do Ceará, 2005 SEDIMENTOLOGIA E QUIMIOESTRATIGRAFIA ISOTÓPICA DE CARBONO E OXIGÊNIO DA TRANSIÇÃO CRETÁCEO – PALEÓGENO EM ROCHAS CARBONÁTICAS, BACIA DA PARAÍBA, NORDESTE DO BRASIL Tese de doutoramento apresentada à Pós- Graduação em Geociências da Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, orientada pelos professores Alcides Nóbrega Sial e Virgínio Henrique de Miranda Lopes Neumann, como um dos requisitos para a obtenção do grau de doutora em Geociências, na área de concentração Geologia Sedimentar e Ambiental. RECIFE, PE 2011 SEDIMENTOLOGIA E QUIMIOESTRATIGRAFIA ISOTÓPICA DE CARBONO E OXIGÊNIO DA TRANSIÇÃO CRETÁCEO – PALEÓGENO EM ROCHAS CARBONÁTICAS, BACIA DA PARAÍBA, NORDESTE DO BRASIL Maria Valberlândia do Nascimento Silva Aprovação: Professor Dr. Alcides Nóbrega Sial 08/04/2011 Professor Dr. Virgínio Henrique de Miranda Lopes Neumann 08/04/2011 Professor Dr. José Antônio Barbosa 08/04/2011 Professor Dr. Claudio Riccomini 08/04/2011 Professor Dr. Aroldo Misi 08/04/2011 À minha família George e Maria Clara (meus amores), Maria da Conceição e Francisco (meus pais) e minhas queridas irmãs (amo vocês!!.). Nascimento‐Silva, 2011 Sedimentologia e Quimioestratigrafia... v AGRADECIMENTOS Ao professor Alcides Nóbrega Sial pela orientação. Ao professor Virgínio Henrique Neumann pela co-orientação e pelo convite para participar deste projeto. Ao Professor Antônio Barbosa pelo incentivo e discussões importantes em todas as etapas da realização deste trabalho.
    [Show full text]