O51739533 1967.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

O51739533 1967.Pdf b4 _-- e- c --_ r !2,47:4 .p&r3LICAT10NS / 7808 Wisconsin Avenue, N. W., Washington, D. C. 20007 li P I NASA FY 1967 BUDGET ANALYSIS CONTENTS subject pag -no Introduction 1 Charts and Tables a. NASA Insta 1la t ions 4 b. Functional Organization of NASA 5 c. Summary of Appropriations (adjusted) 6 d. How the Budget Plan is appropriated in NASA Activities 7 e. Summary of R&D Budget Plan by Program in Cognizant Headquarters Office 8 f. How the R&D Budget Plan is distributed to NASA inst a 1la t ions 9-11 g. How Total Budget Plan is distributed to NASA in- . stallations 12 h. Summary of Construction of Facilities Plan by Location 13 i. Summary of Administrative Operations by Location 14 Office of Manned Space Flight ' ', Gemini Program 15 I Apollo Program 17 Advanced'Missions Program 21 Office of Space Sciences and Applications Physics and Astronomy Programs 23 Lunar and Planetary Programs 29 i Sustaining University Program 37 Launch Vehicle Development Program 39 Launch Vehicle Procurement Program 41 ,I Bioscience Program .44 Meteorological Satellite Program 47 I Communications and Applications Technology Satellites Program 54 Basic Research Program 58 NASA Headquarters Library 1 >., 300 E St. SW Rm. 1120 r' Washington, DC 20546 'i I 0f"fice of Advanced Research and Technology Space Vehicle Systems Program 59 Electronics Systems Program 64 Human Factor Systems Program 67 Space Power and Electric Propulsion Systems Program 69 Nuclear Rockets Program 72 Chemical Propulsion Program 74 Aeronautics Program 77 Office of Tracking and Data Acquisition Tracking and Data Acquisition Program 82 Office of Technology Utilization Technology Utilization Program 85 INTRODUCTION For the first time in its eight year history, NASA's spending in the fiscal year which begins July 1, will decline. The total appropriation being asked for the agency is $5,012 billion -- down nearly $163 million from the previous year. While the new budget should still permit an expedition to the moon be- fore the end of 1969, there is little funding cushion for unexpected problems. What the new budget means is that some of the long-range planning for manned space exploration after the first lunar landing will have to be pared. In his Budget Message, President Johnson said the current decrease in appropriations for the space agency was possible because the nation's large space project were progressing from the expensive developmental phase into operational status and that no new projects of equivalent cost would be star- ted. At a budget briefing, however, a space agency official called the budget "stringent" and said NASA cuts reflected the war in Vietnam and the nation's commitment to health and antipoverty programs at home. NASA originially had asked for $5.58 billion in new obligational authority but that was cut to $4.8 billion by the Budget Bureau. The present $5.012 billion is a compromise. Apollo and Apollo Applications will receive $200 million less than NASA requested. Space sciences programs took a whopping cut of $122 million; NASA's basic research programs were cut about $10 million. -1- Spending for the two-man Gemini project drops sharply, as flights are to be completed this year. Expenditures for the massive Apollo lunar landing prpgram, rising sharply in recent years, will level off. NASA has stretched out the Apollo Applications program to enable Apollo to remain in orbit about the earth for a month or more, or to carry added supplies to the noon for extended exploration. 'This has slowed development of a costly new unmanned spacecraft known as Voyager, designed to land life- detection devices on Mars. Voyager was to have been ready by 1971, now, it is not scheduled to fly until 1973 at the earliest. NASA also cut off de- velopment work on an advanced liquid fueled engine, known as the M-l, which had already been slowed this year as an economy measure. The Advanced Orbi- ting Solar Observatory Program was cancelled. The industrial community, under contracts with the NASA, will continue to carry forward the prime design, development and fabrication effort of the NASA program. Specific elements of the activity will continue to be pur- sued within NASA installations, other government agencies, universities and research contractors which have the necessary level of expertise in special areas of engineering and science. The major elements of the program fall within the following categories: -MANNED SPACE FLIGHT: The attainment of a capability for manned space operations and exploration through the Gemini and Apollo development efforts, and studies of advanced missions which would exploit and ex- tend this capability to the best national interest. -2- SPACE SCIENCE: An unmanned space flight program directed toward the study of the earth, moon, sun, planets, stars and interplanetary space through the use of sounding rockets, earth orbiting spacecraft, lunar spacecraft and interplanetary probes. APPLICATIONS: A program directed toward adapting spacecraft, instru- mentation and data gathering technology to support beneficial space applications such as operational meteorological and communications systems. ADVANCED RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY: An effort required to provide the fundamental knowledge and the technological base for the future aero- nautics and space programs. Detailed reasons and justifications for expenditures of $4,246,600 for R&D; and summary reasons for expending $101,500,000 and $663,900,000 for Adminis- trative operAtinns are contained in the following pages of this analysis. NASA FY 1967 BUDGET ANALYSIS Summary of Appropriations (in thousands of dollars)- P.L. 88-507 P.L. 89-128 Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Appropriation 1965 1966 1967 Research and Development ...... $4,363,594 $4,531,000 $4,246,600 Construction of Facilities.... 262,880 60,000 10 1,500 Administrative Operations ..... 623,526 584,000 663,900 TOTAL .................... $5,250,000 $5,175,000 $5,012,000 -3- IIC W I- Z W U I U K 4 W v) W IIC W 3 v)z 0 cI Aa d ca v)-z a v)a z -4- -,- z 0 aF zP i . n a tia v) n z a uv) 5 a 5 U 2 F5 az -5- 0 9 0 m 0 m Oom rc) U h N a, N 9 m CT, I ill ut om ot dU8 01 Ud gs 01 mm n Nm 0 ua2 51 9 9 hl CIZ !!!b a- hn Lu * 0 I- m 0 v, m 0 L m m n m m 4 h 9 I m N m m I m n U a- a-* 01 m 01 9 01 01 01 01 n L ln h rl m m ln In ut il a- :f z . h . a . 2 ::: :t$: . 0 . z2 . 3 . v, . n n . -0 a al PI . U U m rn . 1 1 -7 .cI a a . a a W W 8 8 d rl k U U hl a cd d .d k a 0 k a a e -6- doa mm 04 04 a mm 71 mfB mP,C (bur 100 L-3 wwm: oms 3 P." mm me m* e e v Y mNN wmu *eo VVY wcm wow uuw W N V " wo NN w ro CulN QNO owe OPN waw vvv VYY ww03 VI-0 QUO 03-e 0030 Now ul m cn mh, mu uc UUN YYV VVY 03Oc mwm 003Ul wem mev, oww ru NO v V ulnl C WI m -1 e PI 0 u: 03 Nl m w1 0 UI N 01u StcF cwu ""V "I" -mmoo0 0 -a uwo *w wwcn vvv Y"" moo rub) -eo uro -Pwo w WN OCOul "I" -*-u -w moo -8- 009 '99z (9$ 99961TS'9$ S69'OLZL9$ ............ 'NWd L33afl8 WLOL .................... 's3rqneuoiag 000 '€E 969'19 09z 'S€ ............'uoys1ndold 1e3Tmay3 000 ' LE OOL '6€ zos '9L ................ 000 ' €s 000 '8s OOO'L5 *sJaT3oX ieal3nN ..............*smaJsLS uois-ynd 00s 'z9 ooz 's9 OZZ '85 ...........-016 3TlJ3a-[3 pu?? laMOd a3edS 000 ' LT 006 '91 OZ€ 'ET *smaJsdS 20~3~6uewnH ............ .smaJsLS squoij3aig 008 '9€ OO€ 'Z€ zz9 'sz .......... 000'9E OOO'S€ €61'99 .................*smaJsLS a13Tyah axds 000'€Z 000 'zz 1€Z'1Z *qDivasaX 3iseg 009'9z 008 ' Z€ 9LL 'OE 009 '€9 006 '8€ 166 'O€ 009 ' s€ OOL '9€ 10s '81 000 'zs1 OOL '8LT L89'151 OOL '€€ OO€ ' ss 00s '96 OOO'I9 000'99 000 ' 99 006 'L61 L€€ '1SZ LZ0'90Z 009'I€I 005 '€91 Z80 '6E1 009 I99$ L€Z '€8L$ m "SNOILV3ITddV aNV 33NZI3S 33VdS ..............-SUOTSST~ pa3ueApV 000 '8 000 '01 000'9z ......................... OOZ '9L6 'Z S8€'L96'Z 619'919'Z ......................... ' OllOdV 009 '09 119 '9zz 009'80E * Tuya3 008 ' ZZO '€ $ 966'€0Z'€$ 610 '696 ' Z $ ............'dH3ITd 33VdS a3NNVN L96l-Ad 9961-Ad 596T -A6 6- r m "0 re+ +re --I- e+- I-++ aaID IDIDID IDID- 2 aa\D IDID- mmm mmm mmm mmrn mmm umu umu a ??Y ...??c" ...."p'c" .*.... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...0.. ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... .....c ....... ... ... C.. ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 1: 1: : : ... ... ... ... ... "> .".WWN ON- NUN NNN NNW mu* Pcu uwu umw mmw NOD mmr -WN NWID "I" """ "+ "0 P f"* P "- ," -"- c muu WON wuw C\NW mao OUvl omw OIDN ow0 O\DC OPvl 000 oum omm 0-N om- c- -+ mNU .Y .c 40 ...OWN p "? *: vlrr umu muNN owm umm I-NU 00- .ma Ill III 00 I auc WID0 L- "- ++e wee.! """ 03-N wPe +vlN 'I- mu- WNr w a,m Pa>: ""e .!!.* "" "" WwW NPm uwm umr *ern oum III Ill 000 ome 0 L? N oom ON^ c e"* I--- I.- cvlc k Zk I-eN c muw LW c' P +?N uum or 0 w "..- --. -" p' .c "" ,u mu0 *NU cme mom 000 ma mm~ IO, am- mom owm 000 m L.
Recommended publications
  • Apollo 8 (AS-503) Mission Operation Report
    Pre- Launch Mission Operation Report No. M-932-68-08 MEMORANDUM To: A/Acting Administrator /7/4-7dY& 5/ From: MA/Apollo Program Director Subject: Apollo 8 Mission (AS-503) No earlier than 21 December 1968, we plan to launch the next Apollo/Saturn V mission, Apollo 8. This will be the first manned Saturn V flight, the second flight of a manned Apollo spacecraft and the first manned Apollo flight to the lunar vicinity. The purpose of this mission is to demonstrate: crew/space vehicle/mission support facilities performance during a manned Saturn V mission with CSM, and performance of nominal and selected backup lunar orbital mission activities including translunar injection, CSM navigation, communications and midcourse corrections, and CSM consumables assessment and passive thermal control. Mission duration is planned for approximately six days and three hours. The launch will be the third Saturn V from.Launch Complex 39 at Kennedy Space Center. The launch window opens at 7~51 EST 21 December and closes for December at 18:20 EST 27 December, Daily windows during this period vary in duration from 4-l/2 hours to approximately l-1/2 hours. The nominal mission will comprise: ascent to parking orbit; translunar injection by the S-IVB; CSM separation from S-IVB; translunar coast with required midcourse corrections; lunar orbit insertion and circularization; up to 10 lunar orbits; transearth injection, transearth coast and required midcourse corrections; reentry and splashdown. Recovery will be in the Pacific recovery area with exact location dependent on launch conditions. Apollo Program Director APPROVAL: /associate Administrator for / Manned Space Flight l_l ,.
    [Show full text]
  • Information Summaries
    TIROS 8 12/21/63 Delta-22 TIROS-H (A-53) 17B S National Aeronautics and TIROS 9 1/22/65 Delta-28 TIROS-I (A-54) 17A S Space Administration TIROS Operational 2TIROS 10 7/1/65 Delta-32 OT-1 17B S John F. Kennedy Space Center 2ESSA 1 2/3/66 Delta-36 OT-3 (TOS) 17A S Information Summaries 2 2 ESSA 2 2/28/66 Delta-37 OT-2 (TOS) 17B S 2ESSA 3 10/2/66 2Delta-41 TOS-A 1SLC-2E S PMS 031 (KSC) OSO (Orbiting Solar Observatories) Lunar and Planetary 2ESSA 4 1/26/67 2Delta-45 TOS-B 1SLC-2E S June 1999 OSO 1 3/7/62 Delta-8 OSO-A (S-16) 17A S 2ESSA 5 4/20/67 2Delta-48 TOS-C 1SLC-2E S OSO 2 2/3/65 Delta-29 OSO-B2 (S-17) 17B S Mission Launch Launch Payload Launch 2ESSA 6 11/10/67 2Delta-54 TOS-D 1SLC-2E S OSO 8/25/65 Delta-33 OSO-C 17B U Name Date Vehicle Code Pad Results 2ESSA 7 8/16/68 2Delta-58 TOS-E 1SLC-2E S OSO 3 3/8/67 Delta-46 OSO-E1 17A S 2ESSA 8 12/15/68 2Delta-62 TOS-F 1SLC-2E S OSO 4 10/18/67 Delta-53 OSO-D 17B S PIONEER (Lunar) 2ESSA 9 2/26/69 2Delta-67 TOS-G 17B S OSO 5 1/22/69 Delta-64 OSO-F 17B S Pioneer 1 10/11/58 Thor-Able-1 –– 17A U Major NASA 2 1 OSO 6/PAC 8/9/69 Delta-72 OSO-G/PAC 17A S Pioneer 2 11/8/58 Thor-Able-2 –– 17A U IMPROVED TIROS OPERATIONAL 2 1 OSO 7/TETR 3 9/29/71 Delta-85 OSO-H/TETR-D 17A S Pioneer 3 12/6/58 Juno II AM-11 –– 5 U 3ITOS 1/OSCAR 5 1/23/70 2Delta-76 1TIROS-M/OSCAR 1SLC-2W S 2 OSO 8 6/21/75 Delta-112 OSO-1 17B S Pioneer 4 3/3/59 Juno II AM-14 –– 5 S 3NOAA 1 12/11/70 2Delta-81 ITOS-A 1SLC-2W S Launches Pioneer 11/26/59 Atlas-Able-1 –– 14 U 3ITOS 10/21/71 2Delta-86 ITOS-B 1SLC-2E U OGO (Orbiting Geophysical
    [Show full text]
  • The Flight Plan
    M A R C H 2 0 2 1 THE FLIGHT PLAN The Newsletter of AIAA Albuquerque Section The American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics AIAA ALBUQUERQUE MARCH 2021 SECTION MEETING: MAKING A DIFFERENCE A T M A C H 2 . Presenter. Lt. Col. Tucker Hamilton Organization USAF F-35 Developmental Test Director of Operations INSIDE THIS ISSUE: Abstract I humbly present my flying experiences through SECTION CALENDAR 2 pictures and videos of what it takes and what it is like to be an Experimental Fighter Test Pilot. My personal stories include NATIONAL AIAA EVENTS 2 major life-threatening aircraft accidents, close saves, combat SPACE NUCLEAR PROPULSION REPORT 3 flying revelations, serendipitous opportunities testing first of its kind technology, flying over 30 aircraft from a zeppelin to a ALBUQUERQUE DECEMBER MEETING 5 MiG-15 to an A-10, and managing the Joint Strike Fighter De- velopmental Test program for all three services. Through ALBUQUERQUE JANUARY MEETING 6 these experiences you will learn not just what a Test Pilot does, but also gain encour- ALBUQUERQUE FEBRUARY MEETING 7 agement through my lessons learned on how to make a difference in your local com- munities…did I mention cool flight test videos! CALL FOR SCIENCE FAIR JUDGES 9 Lt Col Tucker "Cinco" Hamilton started his Air Force career as an CALL FOR SCHOLARSHIP APPLICATIONS 10 operational F-15C pilot. He supported multiple Red Flag Exercises and real world Operation Noble Eagle missions where he protect- NEW AIAA HIGH SCHOOL MEMBERSHIPS 10 ed the President of the United States; at times escorting Air Force One.
    [Show full text]
  • John F. Kennedy Space Center
    1 . :- /G .. .. '-1 ,.. 1- & 5 .\"T!-! LJ~,.", - -,-,c JOHN F. KENNEDY ', , .,,. ,- r-/ ;7 7,-,- ;\-, - [J'.?:? ,t:!, ;+$, , , , 1-1-,> .irI,,,,r I ! - ? /;i?(. ,7! ; ., -, -?-I ,:-. ... 8 -, , .. '',:I> !r,5, SPACE CENTER , , .>. r-, - -- Tp:c:,r, ,!- ' :u kc - - &te -- - 12rr!2L,D //I, ,Jp - - -- - - _ Lb:, N(, A St~mmaryof MAJOR NASA LAUNCHINGS Eastern Test Range Western Test Range (ETR) (WTR) October 1, 1958 - Septeniber 30, 1968 Historical and Library Services Branch John F. Kennedy Space Center "ational Aeronautics and Space Administration l<ennecly Space Center, Florida October 1968 GP 381 September 30, 1968 (Rev. January 27, 1969) SATCIEN S.I!STC)RY DCCCIivlENT University uf A!;b:,rno Rr=-?rrh Zn~tituta Histcry of Sciecce & Technc;oGy Group ERR4TA SHEET GP 381, "A Strmmary of Major MSA Zaunchings, Eastern Test Range and Western Test Range,'" dated September 30, 1968, was considered to be accurate ag of the date of publication. Hmever, additianal research has brought to light new informetion on the official mission designations for Project Apollo. Therefore, in the interest of accuracy it was believed necessary ta issue revfsed pages, rather than wait until the next complete revision of the publiatlion to correct the errors. Holders of copies of thia brochure ate requested to remove and destroy the existing pages 81, 82, 83, and 84, and insert the attached revised pages 81, 82, 83, 84, 8U, and 84B in theh place. William A. Lackyer, 3r. PROJECT MOLL0 (FLIGHTS AND TESTS) (continued) Launch NASA Name -Date Vehicle -Code Sitelpad Remarks/Results ORBITAL (lnaMANNED) 5 Jul 66 Uprated SA-203 ETR Unmanned flight to test launch vehicle Saturn 1 3 7B second (S-IVB) stage and instrment (IU) , which reflected Saturn V con- figuration.
    [Show full text]
  • NASA Symbols and Flags in the US Manned Space Program
    SEPTEMBER-DECEMBER 2007 #230 THE FLAG BULLETIN THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF VEXILLOLOGY www.flagresearchcenter.com 225 [email protected] THE FLAG BULLETIN THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF VEXILLOLOGY September-December 2007 No. 230 Volume XLVI, Nos. 5-6 FLAGS IN SPACE: NASA SYMBOLS AND FLAGS IN THE U.S. MANNED SPACE PROGRAM Anne M. Platoff 143-221 COVER PICTURES 222 INDEX 223-224 The Flag Bulletin is officially recognized by the International Federation of Vexillological Associations for the publication of scholarly articles relating to vexillology Art layout for this issue by Terri Malgieri Funding for addition of color pages and binding of this combined issue was provided by the University of California, Santa Barbara Library and by the University of California Research Grants for Librarians Program. The Flag Bulletin at the time of publication was behind schedule and therefore the references in the article to dates after December 2007 reflect events that occurred after that date but before the publication of this issue in 2010. © Copyright 2007 by the Flag Research Center; all rights reserved. Postmaster: Send address changes to THE FLAG BULLETIN, 3 Edgehill Rd., Winchester, Mass. 01890 U.S.A. THE FLAG BULLETIN (ISSN 0015-3370) is published bimonthly; the annual subscription rate is $68.00. Periodicals postage paid at Winchester. www.flagresearchcenter.com www.flagresearchcenter.com 141 [email protected] ANNE M. PLATOFF (Annie) is a librarian at the University of Cali- fornia, Santa Barbara Library. From 1989-1996 she was a contrac- tor employee at NASA’s Johnson Space Center. During this time she worked as an Information Specialist for the New Initiatives Of- fice and the Exploration Programs Office, and later as a Policy Ana- lyst for the Public Affairs Office.
    [Show full text]
  • Reading Circle: the First Mission to the Moon
    Reading Circle: The First Mission to the Moon Apollo 11 was the spaceflight that landed the first humans on Earth’s Moon on July 20, 1969. The mission, carried out by the United States, Is considered a maJor accomplishment in the history of exploration. Page 2 Launched from Florida on July 16, the fifth manned mission, and the third lunar mission of NASA’s Apollo program, was crewed by Commander Neil Armstrong, Command Module Pilot Michael Pilot Edwin “Buzz” Aldrin, Jr. On July 20, Armstrong and Aldrin landed in the Sea of Tranquility and on July 21 became the first humans to walk on the Moon. Their landing craft, Eagle, spent 21hours and 31 minutes on Page 3 the lunar surface while Collins orbited above in the command ship Columbia. The three astronauts returned to Earth with 47.5 pounds of lunar rocks and landed in the Pacific Ocean on July 24. Apollo 11 fulfilled U.S President John F. Kennedy’s goal of reaching the Moon before the Soviet Union by the end of the 1960s. Five additional Apollo missions landed on the Moon from 1969 to 1972. Page 4 NEIL ARMSTRONG Neil Alden Armstrong, born August 5, 1930 is an American aviator and former Astronaut, test pilot, aerospace engineer, university professor, and United States Naval Aviator. He was the first person to set foot on the Moon. Before becoming an astronaut, Armstrong was in the United States Navy and served in the Korean War. After the war, he served as a test pilot at the National Advisory Committee Page 5 for Aeronautics (NACA) High- Speed Flight Station, now known as the Dryden Flight Research Center, where he flew over 900 flights in a variety of aircraft.
    [Show full text]
  • Astronautics and Aeronautics, 1966
    NASA SP-4007 ASTRONAUTICS AND AERONAUTICS, 1966 Chronology on Science, Technology, and Policy Text by Science and Technology Division Library of Congress Sponsored by NASA Historical Staff Office of Policy Screntrfic and Technrcal Information Divisron 1967 NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION WaJhington, D.C. For Sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402 Price 8.50 (paper cover) Library of Congrcss Catalog Card Nmbcr 66-60096 Foreword . .. At the opening of the tenth year in the era of man’s mobility in outer space, we can look back on 1966 as offering convincing evidence that the United States had gained great competence. This evidence included: five orbital space flights by ten Gemini astronauts; four lunar missions under- taking the orbiting of and softlanding on the moon; numerous contributions to scientific knowledge by unmanned spacecraft and sounding rockets; and further demonstrations of the practical utility of operational space systems, including weather and communications satellites. During 1966, a record 100 American spacecraft were placed into earth orbit or on escape trajectories. Thousands of revealing and useful pictures of the earth were taken from space and of the moon from lunar orbit and on its surface. The Gemini program ended with rendezvous and docking experiments and extravehicular activity by the Gemini test pilots as the Apollo R&D test flights leading to the manned lunar mission came into the schedule. Thirty-five major scientific, technological, and operational mile- stones were cited for 1966 by the President in his Report to the Congress on aeronautical and space activities of the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • The Near Tragedy of Gemini 8: How Neil Armstrong's First Space
    Purdue University Purdue e-Pubs Purdue Undergraduate Research Conference 2019 Purdue Undergraduate Research Conference The eN ar Tragedy of Gemini 8: How Neil Armstrong’s First Space Mission was almost his Last Sam Conkle [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/purc Recommended Citation Conkle, Sam, "The eN ar Tragedy of Gemini 8: How Neil Armstrong’s First Space Mission was almost his Last" (2019). Purdue Undergraduate Research Conference. 6. https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/purc/2019/Oral_Presentations/6 This document has been made available through Purdue e-Pubs, a service of the Purdue University Libraries. Please contact [email protected] for additional information. The Near Tragedy of Gemini 8: How Neil Armstrong’s First Space Mission was almost his Last Sam Conkle, Aeronautical and Aerospace Engineering, Purdue University 3 February 2019 As the space race heated up in the 1960s, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) scrambled to fulfill President John F. Kennedy’s charge to put a man on the moon, and return him safely to earth, all before 1970. Though the Apollo program eventually succeeded, the earlier Gemini program was crucial to ensure the necessary training and technology to make it to the moon and back. In order to reach the president’s deadline, NASA had to resort to an accelerated timeline. This involved managing risks against results, a dangerous game that nearly ended in disaster with Gemini 8. The mission represented several firsts. It was the first attempt at docking, an essential and technically challenging step that the media often overlooks in the grand scale of the moon landing.
    [Show full text]
  • Gemini 9 Press Kit (Release #66-97) Contains Most of the Basic Information About the Flight Which Will Still Apply to the Gemini 9A Flight
    GEMINI 9A lTl*;SS KIT ADDENPA In the re-scheduled Gemini gR mission, an alterrlate rendezvous and docking target vehicle - the Aucmcntcd Targct Dockiw, Rdnptcr -- (ATPA) will be used. The target vehiclr: was rlevelootd as an altc!rnat;c for the Gemini 8 mission or subsequent missions in which an Agena would not be available Since the ATDA has no self-propulsive capabilities, the mission plan has been adjusted to accomplish thc maximum number of object,ives which were scheduled for the original Gemini 9 - Agens fl-ight. The Gemini 9 press kit (Release #66-97) contains most of the basic information about the flight which will still apply to the Gemini 9A flight. The following changes from the 9 press kit are contained in this Addenda and are as follows: 1. General release is replaced by General release in the Addenda 2. Section I, pp. 6-7, is replaced by a revised sequence of events to launch and launch vehicle countdown in the Addenda, pp. 5-8. 3. Section 11, Mission Description, pp. 7-19, is replaced by a revised Mission Description in the Addenda, pp. 9-16 4. Section IV, Crew Provisions and Training, pp. 24-25, has been up- dated with crew activities and training between launches on p. 17 of the Addenda 5. Section V, Tracking Network, pp. 32-39, has been replaced by a re- vised Tracking Network plan for the ATDA pp. 18-28 of the Addenda 6. The description of the Agena Target Vehicle on pp. 45-47 has been replaced by a description of the ATDA on pp.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Spaceflight: Activities for the Intermediate and Junior High Student. INSTITUTION National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Cleveland, Ohio
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 356 941 SE 053 002 AUTHOR Hartsfield, John W.; Hartsfield, Kendra J. TITLE Human Spaceflight: Activities for the Intermediate and Junior High Student. INSTITUTION National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Cleveland, Ohio. Lewis Research Center. PUB DATE Oct 85 NOTE 83p.; For primary student activities, see ED 288 714. AVAILABLE FROMTeacher Resource Room, Visitor Information Center, NASA Lewis Research Center, 21000 Brookpark Road, Cleveland, OH 44135. PUB TYPE Guides Classroom Use Instructional Materials (For Learner) 051) Guides - Classroom Use Teaching Guides (For Teacher)(052) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC04 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Aerospace Education; Biology; Class Activities; Integrated Activities; Intermediate Grades; Junior High Schools; Junior High School Students; *Learning Activities; Mathematics Instruction; Physical Sciences; Puzzles; *Science Activities; *Science Education; Science History; Science Instruction; *Space Exploration; *Space Sciences; Writing Assignments IDENTIFIERS Crossword Puzzles; Hands on Science; Rockets; Space Craft; Spacelab; Space Shuttle; *Space Travel ABSTRACT Since its beginning, space science has created high interest and continues to prod the imagination of students. This activity packet, which has been designed to enhance the curriculum and challenge gifted students, contains background information on spaceflight as well as 24 interdisciplinary classroom activities, 3 crossword puzzles, and 3 word find puzzles. Duplication of the materials for classroom use is encouraged. Sections of the document are as follows:(1) Primitive Beliefs, (2) Our Fantasy of Flight, (3) United States Human Spaceflight Programs,(4) History of Human Spaceflight Activity,(5) Food for Human Spaceflight, (6) Dressed for Spaceflight and Activity,(7) Waste Management Systems and Activity, (8) Human Spaceflight Log,(9) Activities and Pictures, and (10) Bibliography.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Years: Mercury to Apollo-Soyuz the Early Years: Mercury to Apollo-Soyuz
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration Infor␣ mat␣ ion Summar␣ ies PMS 017-C (KSC) September 1991 The Early Years: Mercury to Apollo-Soyuz The Early Years: Mercury to Apollo-Soyuz The United States manned space flight effort has NASA then advanced to the Mercury-Atlas series of progressed through a series of programs of ever orbital missions. Another space milestone was reached increasing scope and complexity. The first Mercury launch on February 20, 1962, when Astronaut John H. Glenn, from a small concrete slab on Complex 5 at Cape Jr., became the first American in orbit, circling the Earth Canaveral required only a few hundred people. The three times in Friendship 7. launch of Apollo 11 from gigantic Complex 39 for man’s On May 24, 1962, Astronaut N. Scott Carpenter in first lunar landing engaged thousands. Each program Aurora 7 completed another three-orbit flight. has stood on the technological achievements of its Astronaut Walter N. Schirra, Jr., doubled the flight predecessor. The complex, sophisticated Space Shuttle time in space and orbited six times, landing Sigma 7 in a of today, with its ability to routinely carry six or more Pacific recovery area. All prior landings had been in the people into space, began as a tiny capsule where even Atlantic. one person felt cramped — the Mercury Program. Project Mercury Project Mercury became an official program of NASA on October 7, 1958. Seven astronauts were chosen in April, 1959, after a nationwide call for jet pilot volunteers. Project Mercury was assigned two broad missions by NASA-first, to investigate man’s ability to survive and perform in the space environment; and second, to develop the basic space technology and hardware for manned spaceflight programs to come.
    [Show full text]
  • Gemini: Rendezvous and Docking INST 154 Apollo at 50 Gemini Objectives
    Gemini: Rendezvous and Docking INST 154 Apollo at 50 Gemini Objectives • To demonstrate endurance of humans and equipment in spaceflight for extended periods, at least eight days required for a Moon landing, to a maximum of two weeks [succeeded] • To effect rendezvous and docking with another vehicle, and to maneuver the combined spacecraft using the propulsion system of the target vehicle [succeeded] • To demonstrate Extra-Vehicular Activity (EVA), or space-"walks" outside the protection of the spacecraft, and to evaluate the astronauts' ability to perform tasks there [succeeded] • To perfect techniques of atmospheric reentry and touchdown at a pre-selected location on land [failed] Timeline • Mercury Mark II program approval (December 1961) • Public announcement as Project Gemini (January 1962) • Last Mercury mission (May 1963) • First uncrewed Gemini mission (April 1964) • First crewed Gemini mission (March 1965) • First US Spacewalk (June 1965) • First Rendezvous (December 1965) • Uncrewed Air Force Gemini B (MOL program) launch (November 1966) • Last Gemini mission (November 1966) • Planned launch of first crewed Apollo mission (February 1967) • Air Force Manned Orbiting Laboratory program cancelled (June 1969) Long Duration Missions (before Shuttle/Mir) • Mercury-Atlas 9 1.4 days • Gemini 4 4.1 days • Gemini 5 7.9 days • Gemini 7 13.8 days • Skylab 2 28.0 days • Skylab 3 59.5 days • Skylab 4 84.1 days Rendezvous Missions (before Apollo 11) • Gemini 5 (Radar Evaluation Pod) [Power limitation] • Gemini 6A (first rendezvous – with
    [Show full text]