DOCSLIB.ORG

Designation of Critical Habitat for the Big Sandy Crayfish

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

5072 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 18 / Tuesday, January 28, 2020 / Proposed Rules DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR the left side of the screen, under the species and the Guyandotte River Document Type heading, click on the crayfish as an endangered species on Fish and Wildlife Service Proposed Rules link to locate this April 7, 2016 (81 FR 20450). document. You may submit a comment The basis for our action. Under the 50 CFR Part 17 by clicking on ‘‘Comment Now!’’ Act, any species that is determined to be an endangered or threatened species [Docket No. FWS–R5–ES–2019–0098; (2) By hard copy: Submit by U.S. mail 4500090023] or hand-delivery to: Public Comments shall, to the maximum extent prudent Processing, Attn: FWS–R5–ES–2019– and determinable, have habitat RIN 1018–BE19 0098, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, designated that is considered to be MS: JAO/1N, 5275 Leesburg Pike, Falls critical habitat. Section 4(b)(2) of the Endangered and Threatened Wildlife Church, VA 22041–3803. Act states that the Secretary shall and Plants; Designation of Critical We request that you send comments designate and make revisions to critical Habitat for the Big Sandy Crayfish and only by the methods described above. habitat on the basis of the best available the Guyandotte River Crayfish We will post all comments on http:// scientific data after taking into AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, www.regulations.gov. This generally consideration the economic impact, the Interior. means that we will post any personal impact on national security, and any other relevant impact of specifying any ACTION: Proposed rule. information you provide us (see Public Comments, below, for more particular area as critical habitat. SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and information). Section 3(5)(A) of the Act defines Wildlife Service (Service), propose to Document availability: This proposed critical habitat as (i) the specific areas designate critical habitat for the Big rule and the DEA are available on the within the geographical area occupied Sandy crayfish (Cambarus callainus) internet at http://www.regulations.gov at by the species, at the time it is listed, and the Guyandotte River crayfish (C. Docket No. FWS–R5–ES–2019–0098, on which are found those physical or veteranus) under the Endangered and at the North Atlantic-Appalachian biological features (I) essential to the Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act). Regional Office (see FOR FURTHER conservation of the species and (II) In total, approximately 582 stream INFORMATION CONTACT). which may require special management kilometers (skm) (362 stream miles The coordinates or plot points or both considerations or protections; and (ii) (smi)) in Martin and Pike Counties, from which the maps are generated are specific areas outside the geographical Kentucky; Buchanan, Dickenson, and included in the administrative record area occupied by the species at the time Wise Counties, Virginia; and McDowell, for this critical habitat designation and it is listed, upon a determination by the Mingo, and Wayne Counties, West are available at http:// Secretary that such areas are essential Virginia, are proposed as critical habitat www.regulations.gov at Docket No. for the conservation of the species. The for the Big Sandy crayfish. FWS–R5–ES–2019–0098, and at the Secretary may exclude an area from Approximately 135 skm (84 smi) in North Atlantic-Appalachian Regional critical habitat if he determines that the Logan and Wyoming Counties, West Office (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION benefits of such exclusion outweigh the Virginia, are proposed as critical habitat CONTACT). Any additional tools or benefits of specifying such area as part for the Guyandotte River crayfish. If we supporting information that we may of the critical habitat, unless he finalize this rule as proposed, it would develop for this critical habitat determines, based on the best scientific extend the Act’s protections to these designation will also be available at the data available, that the failure to species’ critical habitat. We also Regional Office set out above, and may designate such area as critical habitat announce the availability of a draft also be included in the preamble and/ will result in the extinction of the economic analysis of the proposed or at http://www.regulations.gov. species. The critical habitat areas we are designation of critical habitat for these FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: species. proposing to designate in this rule Martin Miller, Chief, Endangered constitute our current best assessment of DATES: We will accept comments on the Species, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the areas that meet the definition of proposed rule or draft economic North Atlantic-Appalachian Regional critical habitat for the Big Sandy and analysis (DEA) that are received or Office, 300 Westgate Center Drive, Guyandotte River crayfishes. We postmarked on or before March 30, Hadley, MA 01035; telephone 413–253– propose to designate: 2020. Comments submitted 8615. Persons who use a • Approximately 582 stream electronically using the Federal telecommunications device for the deaf kilometers (skm) (362 stream miles eRulemaking Portal (see ADDRESSES, (TDD) may call the Federal Relay (smi)) of streams for the Big Sandy below) must be received by 11:59 p.m. Service at 800–877–8339. crayfish. Eastern Time on the closing date. We SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: • Approximately 135 skm (84 smi) of must receive requests for a public streams for the Guyandotte River Executive Summary hearing, in writing, at the address crayfish. shown in FOR FURTHER INFORMATION Why we need to publish a rule. Under We prepared an economic analysis of CONTACT by March 13, 2020. the Act, any species that is determined the proposed designation of critical ADDRESSES: Written comments: You may to be an endangered or threatened habitat. In order to consider economic submit comments on the proposed rule species requires critical habitat to be impacts, we prepared an analysis of the or DEA by one of the following designated, to the maximum extent economic impacts of the proposed methods: prudent and determinable. Designations critical habitat designation. We hereby (1) Electronically: Go to the Federal and revisions of critical habitat can only announce the availability of the draft eRulemaking Portal: http:// be completed by issuing a rule. economic analysis and seek public www.regulations.gov. In the Search box, This rule proposes to designate review and comment. enter FWS–R5–ES–2019–0098, which is critical habitat for two species of Peer review. In accordance with our the docket number for this rulemaking. crayfish, the Big Sandy crayfish and the joint policy on peer review published in Then, click on the Search button. On the Guyandotte River crayfish. We listed the the Federal Register on July 1, 1994 (59 resulting page, in the Search panel on Big Sandy crayfish as a threatened FR 34270), we are seeking comments VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:39 Jan 27, 2020 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\28JAP2.SGM 28JAP2 jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 18 / Tuesday, January 28, 2020 / Proposed Rules 5073 from independent specialists to ensure We particularly seek comments allow us to verify any scientific or that this critical habitat proposal is regarding: commercial information you include. based on scientifically sound data and (i) Whether occupied areas are Please note also that comments analyses. We have invited these peer inadequate for the conservation of the merely stating support for or opposition reviewers to comment on our specific species; and to the action under consideration assumptions and conclusions in this (ii) Specific information that supports without providing supporting proposal to designate critical habitat. the determination that unoccupied areas information, although noted, will not be Because we will consider all comments will, with reasonable certainty, considered in making a determination, and information we receive during the contribute to the conservation of the as section 4(b)(1)(A) of the Act directs comment period, our final species and contain at least one physical that we must make determinations determinations may differ from this or biological feature essential to the ‘‘solely on the basis of the best scientific proposal. conservation of the species. and commercial data available.’’ (3) Land use designations and current You may submit your comments and Information Requested or planned activities in the subject areas materials concerning this proposed rule Public Comments and their possible effects on proposed by one of the methods listed in critical habitat. ADDRESSES. We request that you send We intend that any final action (4) Any probable economic, national comments only by the methods resulting from this proposed rule will be security, or other relevant effects of described in ADDRESSES. based on the best scientific and designating any area that may be If you submit information via http:// commercial data available and be as included in the final designation, and www.regulations.gov, your entire accurate and as effective as possible. the benefits of including or excluding submission—including any personal Therefore, we request comments or areas that may be affected. identifying information—will be posted information from other concerned (5) Information on the extent to which on the website. If your submission is governmental agencies, Native the description of probable economic made via a hardcopy that includes American tribes, the scientific effects in the draft economic analysis personal identifying information, you community, industry, or any other (DEA) is a reasonable estimate of the may request at the top of your document interested parties concerning this likely economic effects. that we withhold this information from proposed rule. We particularly seek (6) Information on land ownership public review. However, we cannot comments concerning: within proposed critical habitat areas, guarantee that we will be able to do so.
Recommended publications
  • Current Practices in the Identification of Critical Habitat for Threatened Species

    Current Practices in the Identification of Critical Habitat for Threatened Species

    Current practices in the identification of critical habitat for threatened species Abbey E Camaclang1*, Martine Maron2, Tara G Martin3, and Hugh P Possingham1,4,5 Author Addresses 1The University of Queensland, School of Biological Sciences, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia 2The University of Queensland, School of Geography, Planning, and Environmental Management, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia 3CSIRO Land and Water, 41 Boggo Road, Dutton Park, QLD 4102, Austrralia 4The University of Queensland, School of Mathematics and Physics, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia 5Imperial College London, Department of Life Sciences, Silwood Park, Ascot SL5 7PY, Berkshire, UK *email [email protected] Abstract The term critical habitat is used to describe the subset of habitat that is essential to the survival and recovery of species. Some countries legally require that critical habitat of listed threatened and endangered species be identified and protected. However, there is little evidence to suggest that the identification of critical habitat has had much impact on species recovery. We hypothesized that this may be due at least partly to a mismatch between the intent of critical habitat identification, which is to protect sufficient habitat for species persistence and recovery, and its practice. We used content analysis to systematically review critical habitat documents from the United States, Canada, and Australia. In particular, we identified the major trends in type of information used to identify critical habitat and in occupancy of habitat identified as critical. Information about population viability was used to identify critical habitat for only 1% of the species reviewed, and for most species, designated critical habitat did not include unoccupied habitat.
  • Proposed Rule

    Proposed Rule

    This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 01/28/2020 and available online at https://federalregister.gov/d/2020-01012, and on govinfo.gov DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 [Docket No. FWS–R5–ES–2019–0098; 4500090023] RIN 1018-BE19 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Designation of Critical Habitat for the Big Sandy Crayfish and the Guyandotte River Crayfish AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior. ACTION: Proposed rule. SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), propose to designate critical habitat for the Big Sandy crayfish (Cambarus callainus) and the Guyandotte River crayfish (C. veteranus) under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act). In total, approximately 582 stream kilometers (skm) (362 stream miles (smi)) in Martin and Pike Counties, Kentucky; Buchanan, Dickenson, and Wise Counties, Virginia; and McDowell, Mingo, and Wayne Counties, West Virginia, are proposed as critical habitat for the Big Sandy crayfish. Approximately 135 skm (84 smi) in Logan and Wyoming Counties, West Virginia, are proposed as critical habitat for the Guyandotte River crayfish. If we finalize this rule as proposed, it would extend the Act’s protections to these species’ critical habitat. We also announce the availability of a draft economic analysis of the proposed designation of critical habitat for these species. DATES: We will accept comments on the proposed rule or draft economic analysis (DEA) that are received or postmarked on or before [INSERT DATE 60 DAYS AFTER DATE OF 1 PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER]. Comments submitted electronically using the Federal eRulemaking Portal (see ADDRESSES, below) must be received by 11:59 p.m.
  • The Disastrous Impacts of Trump's Border Wall on Wildlife

    The Disastrous Impacts of Trump's Border Wall on Wildlife

    a Wall in the Wild The Disastrous Impacts of Trump’s Border Wall on Wildlife Noah Greenwald, Brian Segee, Tierra Curry and Curt Bradley Center for Biological Diversity, May 2017 Saving Life on Earth Executive Summary rump’s border wall will be a deathblow to already endangered animals on both sides of the U.S.-Mexico border. This report examines the impacts of construction of that wall on threatened and endangered species along the entirety of the nearly 2,000 miles of the border between the United States and Mexico. TThe wall and concurrent border-enforcement activities are a serious human-rights disaster, but the wall will also have severe impacts on wildlife and the environment, leading to direct and indirect habitat destruction. A wall will block movement of many wildlife species, precluding genetic exchange, population rescue and movement of species in response to climate change. This may very well lead to the extinction of the jaguar, ocelot, cactus ferruginous pygmy owl and other species in the United States. To assess the impacts of the wall on imperiled species, we identified all species protected as threatened or endangered under the Endangered Species Act, or under consideration for such protection by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (“candidates”), that have ranges near or crossing the border. We also determined whether any of these species have designated “critical habitat” on the border in the United States. Finally, we reviewed available literature on the impacts of the existing border wall. We found that the border wall will have disastrous impacts on our most vulnerable wildlife, including: 93 threatened, endangered and candidate species would potentially be affected by construction of a wall and related infrastructure spanning the entirety of the border, including jaguars, Mexican gray wolves and Quino checkerspot butterflies.
  • Antillean Manatee Trichechus Manatus Manatus Belize

    Antillean Manatee Trichechus Manatus Manatus Belize

    Antillean Manatee Trichechus manatus manatus Belize Compiler: Jamal Galves Contributors: Jamal Galves, Joel Verde, Celia Mahung Suggested citation: Galves, J, Belize National Manatee Working Group and Verde, J. A. 2020. A Survival Blueprint for the Antillean Mantees Trichechus manatus manatus of Belize. Results from the EDGE PhotoArk NatGeo Fellowship Project: Efforts to Safeguard the Antillean Manatees of Belize. EDGE of Existence Programme, Zoological Society of London. 1. STATUS REVIEW 1.1 Taxonomy: The West Indian manatee (Trichechus manatus), is from the order of the sirenian of the Trichechidae family and is divided into two subspecies: the Florida manatee T. m. latirostris; and the Antillean manatee T. m. manatus (Hatt, 1934). Antillean Manatee Florida Manatee Kingdom: Animalia Kingdom: Animalia Order: Sirenia Order: Sirenia Phylum: Chordata Phylum: Chordata Family: Trichechidae Family: Trichechidae Class: Mammalia Class: Mammalia Genus: Trichechus Genus: Trichechus Species: Trichechus manatus manatus Species: Trichechus manatus ssp. latirostris 1.2 Distribution and population status: Figure 1. Map of Antillean and Florida manatee distribution. Dark grey area shows the distribution of Antillean manatee Trichechus manatus manatus. The distribution of the Florida manatee is displayed in diagonal lines, and the known subpopulations of Antillean manatee with the species genetic barriers is demarcated with dotted lines, according to Vianna et al., 2006. Map used from Castelblanco-Martínez et al 2012. The Antillean Manatee has a fragmented distribution that ranges from the southeast of Texas to as far as the northeast of Brazil, including the Greater Antilles (Lefebvre et al., 2001; Reynolds and Powell, 2002). This species can be found in coastal marine, brackish and freshwater systems, and is capable to alternate between these three environments (Lefebvre, 2001).
  • Endangered Species Act Section 7 Consultation Final Programmatic

    Endangered Species Act Section 7 Consultation Final Programmatic

    Endangered Species Act Section 7 Consultation Final Programmatic Biological Opinion and Conference Opinion on the United States Department of the Interior Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement’s Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act Title V Regulatory Program U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Ecological Services Program Division of Environmental Review Falls Church, Virginia October 16, 2020 Table of Contents 1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................3 2 Consultation History .........................................................................................................4 3 Background .......................................................................................................................5 4 Description of the Action ...................................................................................................7 The Mining Process .............................................................................................................. 8 4.1.1 Exploration ........................................................................................................................ 8 4.1.2 Erosion and Sedimentation Controls .................................................................................. 9 4.1.3 Clearing and Grubbing ....................................................................................................... 9 4.1.4 Excavation of Overburden and Coal ................................................................................
  • September 24, 2018

    September 24, 2018

    September 24, 2018 Sent via Federal eRulemaking Portal to: http://www.regulations.gov Docket Nos. FWS-HQ-ES-2018-0006 FWS-HQ-ES-2018-0007 FWS-HQ-ES-2018-0009 Bridget Fahey Chief, Division of Conservation and Classification U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 5275 Leesburg Pike, MS: ES Falls Church, VA 22041-3808 [email protected] Craig Aubrey Chief, Division of Environmental Review Ecological Services Program U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 5275 Leesburg Pike, MS: ES Falls Church, VA 22041 [email protected] Samuel D. Rauch, III National Marine Fisheries Service Office of Protected Resources 1315 East-West Highway Silver Spring, MD 20910 [email protected] Re: Proposed Revisions of Endangered Species Act Regulations Dear Mr. Aubrey, Ms. Fahey, and Mr. Rauch: The Southern Environmental Law Center (“SELC”) submits the following comments in opposition to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s and National Marine Fisheries Service’s proposed revisions to the Endangered Species Act’s implementing regulations.1 We submit these comments on behalf of 57 organizations working to protect the natural resources of the 1 Revision of the Regulations for Prohibitions to Threatened Wildlife and Plants, 83 Fed. Reg. 35,174 (proposed July 25, 2018) (to be codified at 50 C.F.R. pt. 17); Revision of Regulations for Interagency Cooperation, 83 Fed. Reg. 35,178 (proposed July 25, 2018) (to be codified at 50 C.F.R. pt. 402); Revision of the Regulations for Listing Species and Designating Critical Habitat, 83 Fed. Reg. 35,193 (proposed July 25, 2018) (to be codified at 50 C.F.R.
  • ESA (Endangered Species Act) Basics

    ESA (Endangered Species Act) Basics

    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service ESA Basics 40 Years of Conserving Endangered Species When Congress passed the Endangered Critical habitat may include areas that are Species Act (ESA) in 1973, it recognized not occupied by the species at the time of that our rich natural heritage is of listing but are essential to its conservation. “esthetic, ecological, educational, An area can be excluded from critical recreational, and scientifc value to habitat designation if an economic analysis our Nation and its people.” It further determines that the benefts of excluding expressed concern that many of our it outweigh the benefts of including it, nation’s native plants and animals were in unless failure to designate the area as danger of becoming extinct. critical habitat may lead to extinction of the listed species. The purpose of the ESA is to protect and recover imperiled species and the Candidates for Listing ecosystems upon which they depend. The FWS also maintains a list of The Interior Department’s U.S. Fish USFWS “candidate” species. These are species for and Wildlife Service (FWS) and the which the FWS has enough information to Commerce Department’s National warrant proposing them for listing but is Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) precluded from doing so by higher listing administer the ESA. The FWS has priorities. While listing actions of higher primary responsibility for terrestrial priority go forward, the FWS works with and freshwater organisms, while the States, Tribes, private landowners, private responsibilities of NMFS are mainly partners, and other Federal agencies to marine wildlife such as whales and carry out conservation actions for these anadromous fsh such as salmon.
  • Critical Habitat, What Is

    Critical Habitat, What Is

    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Critical Habitat What is it? When a species is proposed for listing as endangered or threatened under the Endangered Species Act (Act), we must consider whether there are areas of habitat we believe are essential to the species’ conservation. Those areas may be proposed for designation as “critical habitat.” The determination and designation of critical habitat is one of the most controversial and confusing aspects of the Act. Here are answers to some of the most frequently asked questions about critical habitat. What is critical habitat? Critical habitat is a term defined and used in the Act. It is a specific geographic area(s) that is essential for the conservation of a threatened or endangered species and that may require special management and protection. Critical habitat may include an area that is not currently occupied by the species Ash Meadows National Wildlife Refuge but that will be needed for its recovery. in Nevada provides critical habitat for An area is designated as “critical habitat” Do listed species in critical habitat areas eight threatened or endangered species. after we publish a proposed Federal receive more protection? Photo by Mike Bender regulation in the Federal Register and An area designated as critical habitat is then we receive and consider public not a refuge or sanctuary for the species. comments on the proposal. The final Listed species and their habitat are carry out will not jeopardize the survival boundaries of the critical habitat area is protected by the Act whether or not they of a threatened or endangered species.
  • Gazetteer of West Virginia

    Gazetteer of West Virginia

    Bulletin No. 233 Series F, Geography, 41 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CHARLES D. WALCOTT, DIKECTOU A GAZETTEER OF WEST VIRGINIA I-IEISTRY G-AN3STETT WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1904 A» cl O a 3. LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL. DEPARTMENT OP THE INTEKIOR, UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY, Washington, D. C. , March 9, 190Jh SIR: I have the honor to transmit herewith, for publication as a bulletin, a gazetteer of West Virginia! Very respectfully, HENRY GANNETT, Geogwvpher. Hon. CHARLES D. WALCOTT, Director United States Geological Survey. 3 A GAZETTEER OF WEST VIRGINIA. HENRY GANNETT. DESCRIPTION OF THE STATE. The State of West Virginia was cut off from Virginia during the civil war and was admitted to the Union on June 19, 1863. As orig­ inally constituted it consisted of 48 counties; subsequently, in 1866, it was enlarged by the addition -of two counties, Berkeley and Jeffer­ son, which were also detached from Virginia. The boundaries of the State are in the highest degree irregular. Starting at Potomac River at Harpers Ferry,' the line follows the south bank of the Potomac to the Fairfax Stone, which was set to mark the headwaters of the North Branch of Potomac River; from this stone the line runs due north to Mason and Dixon's line, i. e., the southern boundary of Pennsylvania; thence it follows this line west to the southwest corner of that State, in approximate latitude 39° 43i' and longitude 80° 31', and from that corner north along the western boundary of Pennsylvania until the line intersects Ohio River; from this point the boundary runs southwest down the Ohio, on the northwestern bank, to the mouth of Big Sandy River.
  • The Conservation Status of Cambarus (Puncticambarus) Veteranus, Big Sandy Crayfish and Cambarus (Jugicambarus) Parvoculus, Mountain Midget Crayfish in Kentucky

    The Conservation Status of Cambarus (Puncticambarus) Veteranus, Big Sandy Crayfish and Cambarus (Jugicambarus) Parvoculus, Mountain Midget Crayfish in Kentucky

    The conservation status of Cambarus (Puncticambarus) veteranus, Big Sandy Crayfish and Cambarus (Jugicambarus) parvoculus, Mountain Midget Crayfish in Kentucky MBI Technical Report MBI/2010 May 25, 2010 Submitted by: Center for Applied Bioassessment & Biocriteria Midwest Biodiversity Institute, Inc. P.O. Box 21561 Columbus, OH 43221-0561 Chris O. Yoder, Research Director [email protected] For Roger F. Thoma, Principal Investigator [email protected] To: Kentucky Department of Fish & Wildlife Resources #1 Sportsman’s Lane Frankfort, KY 40601 Cambarus (J.) parvoculus, mountain midget crayfish, unnamed tributary Island Creek, Catoosa Wildlife Management Area, Morgan County, Tennessee (photo Zac Loughman). Cambarus (J.) distans, boxclaw crayfish, unnamed tributary of Cooper Creek, McCreary County, 23 July 2009. i Cambarus (J.) jezerinaci, spiny scale crayfish, Recently molted Cambarus (P.) veteranus, Big Sandy Crayfish; Russell Fork, Dickenson Co., Virginia. ii Table of Contents PROJECT SUMMARY .............................................................................................................................1 INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................................................2 MATERIALS & METHODS ....................................................................................................................2 RESULTS ....................................................................................................................................................4
  • The Crayfishes of West Virginia's Southwestern Coalfields Region

    The Crayfishes of West Virginia's Southwestern Coalfields Region

    Marshall University Marshall Digital Scholar Theses, Dissertations and Capstones 1-1-2013 The rC ayfishes of West Virginia’s Southwestern Coalfields Region with an Emphasis on the Life History of Cambarus theepiensis David Allen Foltz II Follow this and additional works at: http://mds.marshall.edu/etd Part of the Aquaculture and Fisheries Commons, and the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons Recommended Citation Foltz, David Allen II, "The rC ayfishes of West Virginia’s Southwestern Coalfields Region with an Emphasis on the Life History of Cambarus theepiensis" (2013). Theses, Dissertations and Capstones. Paper 731. This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Marshall Digital Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses, Dissertations and Capstones by an authorized administrator of Marshall Digital Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Crayfishes of West Virginia’s Southwestern Coalfields Region with an Emphasis on the Life History of Cambarus theepiensis A Thesis submitted to the Graduate College of Marshall University Huntington, WV In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Biological Sciences: Watershed Resource Science Prepared by David Allen Foltz II Approved by Committee Members: Zachary Loughman, Ph.D., Major Advisor David Mallory, Ph.D., Committee Member Mindy Armstead, Ph.D., Committee Member Thomas Jones, Ph.D., Committee Member Thomas Pauley, Ph.D., Committee Member Marshall University Defended 11/13/2013 Final Submission to the Graduate College December 2013 ©2013 David Allen Foltz II ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii AKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to extend my gratitude to my committee members.
  • Center for Excellence in Disabilities at West Virginia University, Robert C

    Center for Excellence in Disabilities at West Virginia University, Robert C

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This publication was made possible by the support of the following organizations and individuals: Center for Excellence in Disabilities at West Virginia University, Robert C. Byrd Health Sciences Center West Virginia Assistive Technology System (WVATS) West Virginia Division of Natural Resources West Virginia Division of Tourism Partnerships in Assistive Technologies, Inc. (PATHS) Special thanks to Stephen K. Hardesty and Brittany Valdez for their enthusiasm while working on this Guide. 1 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION .......................................................... 3 • How to Use This Guide ......................................... 4 • ADA Sites .............................................................. 5 • Types of Fish ......................................................... 7 • Traveling in West Virginia ...................................... 15 COUNTY INDEX .......................................................... 19 ACTIVITY LISTS • Public Access Sites ............................................... 43 • Lakes ..................................................................... 53 • Trout Fishing ......................................................... 61 • River Float Trips .................................................... 69 SITE INDEX ................................................................. 75 SITE DESCRIPTIONS .................................................. 83 APPENDICES A. Recreation Organizations ......................................207 B. Trout Stocking Schedule .......................................209