DOCSLIB.ORG

2012-13 DCSI Annual Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Department for Communities and Social Inclusion ANNUAL REPORT 2012-13 Feedback on the Department for Communities and Social Inclusion Annual Report 2012-13 can be submitted via email to [email protected]. Comments provided will ensure that the requirements and expectations of stakeholders and members of the public are satisfied in the development of the annual report for the 2013-14 financial year. Office Address Riverside Centre North Terrace Adelaide SA 5000 Postal Address GPO Box 292 Adelaide SA 5001 Telephone (08) 8226 8800 © Government of South Australia, September 2013 ISSN 2200-8160 (Print) ISSN 2200-8179 (Online) ABN 11 525 031 744 The annual report is available from the website of the Department for Communities and Social Inclusion at www.dcsi.sa.gov.au. The information in this publication can be provided in an alternative format or another language on request. Please contact (08) 8413 9050. This annual report was prepared by Business Affairs, Financial Services, of the Department for Communities and Social Inclusion. Department for Communities and Social Inclusion Letter of Transmittal Hon Tony Piccolo MP Minister for Communities and Social Inclusion Minister for Social Housing Minister for Disabilities Minister for Youth Minister for Volunteers Hon Gail Gago MLC Minister for the Status of Women Hon Jennifer Rankine MP Minister for Multicultural Affairs Dear Ministers I am pleased to submit the annual report of the Department for Communities and Social Inclusion for the year ended 30 June 2013. This report highlights the many achievements of the department during the 2012-13 financial year, including our performance against the Seven Strategic Priorities of the South Australian Government and progress towards the targets of South Australia’s Strategic Plan. The report has been prepared in accordance with the Public Sector Act 2009, Public Finance and Audit Act 1987, and other legislation as required. Yours sincerely Ms Joslene Mazel Chief Executive Department for Communities and Social Inclusion 30 September 2013 Annual Report 2012-13 1 Table of Contents Letter of Transmittal........................................ 1 Risk Management and Internal Audit Services ............................................................ 80 Chief Executive’s Report ................................ 3 DCSI Client Feedback System ......................... 80 Privacy .............................................................. 81 About DCSI Information Sharing Guidelines ........................ 81 Our Vision.......................................................... 6 Procurement and Grants .................................. 82 Our Objectives................................................... 6 Our Values......................................................... 6 Corporate Reporting Organisational Structure.................................... 7 Reconciliation ................................................... 83 Strategic Plan 2013-2016.................................. 9 Carers Recognition Act 2005............................ 83 Disability Action Plan ........................................ 85 Our Performance Julia Farr Services (Trusts) Act 2007 ............... 85 Government’s Strategic Priorities.................... 10 Freedom of Information .................................... 86 South Australia’s Strategic Plan ...................... 11 Regional Impact Assessment Statements........................................................ 88 DCSI Scorecard............................................... 20 Greening of Government Operations Regional Service Integration Program ............ 21 Framework........................................................ 88 Social Housing................................................. 22 Energy Efficiency Action Plan........................... 90 Disability SA .................................................... 27 Asbestos Management in Government Disability and Domiciliary Care Services......... 34 Buildings ........................................................... 90 Communities and Partners.............................. 41 Urban Design Charter....................................... 90 Status of Women ............................................. 57 Overseas Travel ............................................... 91 Multicultural SA................................................ 60 Fraud................................................................. 92 Whistleblowers.................................................. 92 Our People Workplace Statistics ........................................ 62 Financial Reporting Occupational Health, Safety and Welfare ....... 69 Account Payment Performance........................ 93 College for Learning and Development........... 73 Consultants....................................................... 93 Contractual Arrangements................................ 94 Governance Arrangements Governance Principles .................................... 74 Financial Statements...................................... 98 Internal Governance Bodies............................ 75 Legislation ....................................................... 78 Our Locations and Contact Details............. 165 Boards and Committees.................................. 79 Acronyms ...................................................... 170 2 Department for Communities and Social Inclusion Chief Executive’s Report The 2012-13 financial year was the first full year of operation for the Department for Communities and Social Inclusion (DCSI), which was created in October 2011 following machinery of government reforms. The year was both challenging and rewarding, as we worked to build strong and inclusive communities. On 21 February 2013, the Premier, the Hon Jay Weatherill MP, announced a Cabinet reshuffle which led to the Hon Tony Piccolo MP replacing the Hon Ian Hunter MLC as the Minister for Communities and Social Inclusion, Social Housing, Disabilities, Youth and Volunteers. I would like to thank Minister Hunter for his strong support for the department following his appointment in October 2011, particularly his leadership of major reforms in disability and social housing, and wish him well in his new portfolios. During 2012-13, the department achieved many highlights which support the Seven Strategic Priorities of the South Australian Government, in particular: Creating a vibrant city; Safe communities, healthy neighbourhoods; An affordable place to live; and Every chance for every child. Originally signed in December 2008, the National Partnership Agreement on Homelessness (NPAH) has achieved significant reforms to the homelessness sector across South Australia. The NPAH was due to expire on 30 June 2013. In April 2013, it was announced that the State Government had agreed to a transitional agreement which will allow service continuity while negotiations are undertaken with the Commonwealth Government for a new, longer term agreement. The transitional agreement secured $17.2 million to assist in reducing homelessness across the State, with both governments providing matched funding contributions of $8.62 million. On 8 February 2013, the UNO Apartments, located at 102 Waymouth Street, Adelaide, were officially opened by the Premier and the Hon Mark Butler MP, then Commonwealth Minister for Housing and Homelessness, with the Hon Tony Piccolo MP, Minister for Social Housing, and the Hon Jennifer Rankine MP, Minister for Education and Child Development, in attendance. The UNO Apartments provide a mix of social, affordable and general market housing in a single multi-unit building, and incorporates a youth homelessness service. In March 2013, the UNO Apartments were awarded the National Urban Development Institute of Australia National Award for Excellence in High Density Housing. In June 2013, the Premier announced a reform management package that involves the State Government working closely with the community housing sector to ensure South Australia has a strong social housing sector. Better Together will see the transfer of up to 5000 public housing properties to the community housing sector, with the initial transfer of 1000 properties to occur over the next 18 months. In July 2012, the State Government reached in-principle agreement with the Commonwealth Government for a National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) launch site in South Australia. Commencing on 1 July 2013, the launch site will support children aged between birth and 14 years. Upon full implementation of the scheme in 2018-19, State Government funding for disability services will increase to $723 million. This once in a generation reform will, when fully operational, benefit more that 32 000 South Australians by providing them with greater choice and control over the supports they receive. Another major reform in disability is the new Individualised Funding approach, which also gives people choice and control over the services they receive and who provides them. Individualised Funding is being implemented in three stages, expanding on the previous trial of self-managed funding. Annual Report 2012-13 3 Stage 1 of Individualised Funding commenced in November 2012 and by 2014 all clients of Disability SA who receive six hours or more of support per week will be allocated a personal budget. Through Individualised Funding, South Australia will be well prepared for the full implementation of the NDIS from 2018. On 23 May 2013, eight Smart Living Apartments at Woodville West were officially opened. These apartments
Recommended publications
  • Media Release

    Media Release

    MEDIA RELEASE 7 February 2017 Premier awards Tennyson Medal at SACE Merit Ceremony The Premier of South Australia, the Hon. Jay Weatherill MP, awarded the prestigious Tennyson Medal for excellence in English Studies to 2016 Year 12 graduate, Ashleigh Jones at the SACE Merit Ceremony at Government House today. The ceremony, in its twenty-ninth year, saw 996 students awarded with 1302 subject merits for outstanding achievement in SACE Stage 2 subjects. Subject merits are awarded to students who gain an overall subject grade of A+ and demonstrate exceptional achievement in that subject. As part of the Merit Ceremony, His Excellency the Hon. Hieu Van Le AC, the Governor of South Australia, presented the following awards: Governor of South Australia Commendation for outstanding overall achievement in the SACE (twenty-five recipients in 2016) Governor of South Australia Commendation — Aboriginal Student SACE Award for the Aboriginal student with the highest overall achievement in the SACE Governor of South Australia Commendation – Excellence in Modified SACE Award for the student with an identified intellectual disability who demonstrates outstanding achievement exclusively through SACE modified subjects. The Tennyson Medal dates back to 1901 when the former Governor of South Australia, Lord Tennyson, established the Tennyson Medal to encourage the study of English literature. The long list of recipients includes the late John Bannon AO, 39th Premier of South Australia, who was awarded the medal in 1961. For her Year 12 English Studies, Ashleigh studied works by Henrik Ibsen (A Doll’s House), Zhang Yimou who directed Raise the Red Lantern, and Tennessee Williams (The Glass Menagerie).
  • 2017 Annual Report ABOUT DON

    2017 Annual Report ABOUT DON

    2017 Annual Report ABOUT DON Don Dunstan was one of Australia’s most charismatic, courageous, and visionary politicians; a dedicated reformer with a deep commitment to social justice, a true friend to the Aboriginal people and those newly arrived in Australia, and with a lifelong passion for the arts and education. He took positive steps to enhance the status of women. Most of his reforms have withstood the test of time and ‘We have faltered in our quest to many have been strengthened with time. Many of his reforms in sex discrimination, Aboriginal land rights provide better lives for all our and consumer protection were the first of their kind in citizens, rather than just for the Australia. talented, lucky groups. To regain He was a leading campaigner for immigration reform and our confidence in our power to was instrumental in the elimination of the White Australia shape the society in which we live, Policy. He was instrumental in social welfare and child protection reforms, consumer protection, Aboriginal and to replace fear and just land rights, urban planning, heritage protection, anti- coping with shared joy, optimism discrimination laws, abolition of capital punishment, and mutual respect, needs new environment protection and censorship. imagining and thinking and learning from what succeeds elsewhere.’ The Hon. Don Dunstan AC QC 2 CONTENTS NOTE: The digital copy of this report contains hyperlinks. These include the page numbers below, some images, and social media links throughout the report. 2 About Don 11 Art4Good Fund 4 Chair’s Report 12 Thinkers in Residence 5 Achievements 16 Adelaide Zero Project 6 Governance and Staff 19 Media Coverage Advisory Boards, Donate and Volunteer 7 Interns & Volunteers 20 8 Events 21 Financial Report 10 Scholarships 3 CHAIR’S REPORT In 2017 we celebrated 50 years since Don Dunstan first became Premier.
  • Policy Life Cycle Analysis of Three Australian State-Level Public

    Policy Life Cycle Analysis of Three Australian State-Level Public

    Article Journal of Development Policy Life Cycle Policy and Practice 6(1) 9–35, 2021 Analysis of Three © 2021 Aequitas Consulting Pvt. Ltd. and SAGE Australian State-level Reprints and permissions: in.sagepub.com/journals-permissions-india Public Policies: DOI: 10.1177/2455133321998805 Exploring the journals.sagepub.com/home/jdp Political Dimension of Sustainable Development Kuntal Goswami1,2 and Rolf Gerritsen1 Abstract This article analyses the life cycle of three Australian public policies (Tasmania Together [TT], South Australia’s Strategic Plan [SASP,] and Western Australia’s State Sustainability Strategy [WA’s SSS]). These policies were formulated at the state level and were structured around sustainable development concepts (the environmental, economic, and social dimensions). This study highlights contexts that led to the making of these public policies, as well as factors that led to their discontinuation. The case studies are based on analysis of parliamentary debates, state governments’ budget reports, public agencies’ annual reports, government media releases, and stakeholders’ feedback. The empirical findings highlight the importance of understanding the political dimension of sustainable development. This fact highlights the need to look beyond the traditional three-dimensional view of sustainability when assessing the success (or lack thereof) of sustainable development policies. Equally important, the analysis indicates that despite these policies’ limited success (and even one of these policies not being implemented at all), sustainability policies can have a legacy beyond their life cycle. Hence, the evaluation of these policies is likely to provide insight into the process of policymaking. 1 Charles Darwin University (CDU), Alice Springs, Northern Territory, Australia. 2 Australian Centre for Sustainable Development Research & Innovation (ACSDRI), Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
  • Sixteen Years of Labor Government in South Australia, 2002-2018

    Sixteen Years of Labor Government in South Australia, 2002-2018

    AUSTRALASIAN PARLIAMENTARY REVIEW Parliament in the Periphery: Sixteen Years of Labor Government in South Australia, 2002-2018* Mark Dean Research Associate, Australian Industrial Transformation Institute, Flinders University of South Australia * Double-blind reviewed article. Abstract This article examines the sixteen years of Labor government in South Australia from 2002 to 2018. With reference to industry policy and strategy in the context of deindustrialisation, it analyses the impact and implications of policy choices made under Premiers Mike Rann and Jay Weatherill in attempts to progress South Australia beyond its growing status as a ‘rustbelt state’. Previous research has shown how, despite half of Labor’s term in office as a minority government and Rann’s apparent disregard for the Parliament, the executive’s ‘third way’ brand of policymaking was a powerful force in shaping the State’s development. This article approaches this contention from a new perspective to suggest that although this approach produced innovative policy outcomes, these were a vehicle for neo-liberal transformations to the State’s institutions. In strategically avoiding much legislative scrutiny, the Rann and Weatherill governments’ brand of policymaking was arguably unable to produce a coordinated response to South Australia’s deindustrialisation in a State historically shaped by more interventionist government and a clear role for the legislature. In undermining public services and hollowing out policy, the Rann and Wethearill governments reflected the path dependency of responses to earlier neo-liberal reforms, further entrenching neo-liberal responses to social and economic crisis and aiding a smooth transition to Liberal government in 2018. INTRODUCTION For sixteen years, from March 2002 to March 2018, South Australia was governed by the Labor Party.
  • Body Freezer

    Body Freezer

    BODY IN THE FREEZER the Case of David Szach Acknowledgements I am indebted to editorial comments and suggestions from Jan McInerney, Pat Sheahan, Anthony Bishop, Dr Harry Harding, Michael Madigan, and Dr Bob Moles. Andrew Smart of Blackjacket Studios designed the cover. I especially appreciate the support of my wife, Liz. ISBN: 978-0-9944162-0-9 This book is copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study, research, criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright Act, no part may be reproduced by any process without written permission. Printed in Adelaide by Griffin Press Any enquiries to the author’s email: [email protected] BODY IN THE FREEZER the Case of David Szach TOM MANN Author’s note Following the publication of the Edward Splatt case in Flawed Forensics, David Szach approached me to examine and write up his case. I met with David Szach a number of times to record his version of events and his efforts to clear his name for the murder of lawyer Derrance Stevenson. After examining the trial transcripts, the grounds for appeal, and the reports by forensic scientists investigating the evidence presented by the forensic pathologist, I unravel the crime to reveal its hidden nature and consequences. CONTENTS Introduction … 1 1: Body in the freezer … 3 2: Prime suspect … 7 3: Derrance Stevenson and the Adelaide scene … 21 4: Before the trial … 26 5: Trial evidence … 32 6: Dr Colin Manock’s evidence … 47 7: David Szach’s statement … 60 8: Shaky underpinning for the Crown … 73 9: Blood and fingerprints
  • Rear Admiral the Honourable Kevin Scarce AC CSC RAN (Rtd) Royal

    Rear Admiral the Honourable Kevin Scarce AC CSC RAN (Rtd) Royal

    Rear Admiral the Honourable Kevin Scarce AC CSC RAN (Rtd) Royal Commissioner Nuclear Fuel Cycle Royal Commission GPO Box 11043 Adelaide SA 5001 3 August 2015 Dear Sir, This is my consolidated submission to the Nuclear Fuel Cycle Royal Commission addressing selected questions from all Issues Papers. Issues Paper One: Exploration, Extraction and Milling My response to Question 1.7 regarding the demand for uranium in the medium and long term is as follows. To begin, I quote the Commissioner from the article titled, “Jobs in nuclear industry are ‘decades away’”, published in The Advertiser on 25 July 2015: “If we decided – and we haven’t decided yet – to recommend parts of the nuclear fuel cycle, it would be a couple of decades before we started to see the major impact.” I submit that at this point in time there is no way to prove a sound basis exists for concluding there will be increased demand for uranium in the medium and long term. No doubt nuclear proponents will point to the world’s increasing energy needs, especially of the two developing giants, China and India. On the demand side, it is true the world will be looking for emissions-free energy on a massive scale to replace traditional fossil fuels. If uranium for producing nuclear energy was the only option to replace fossil fuels, I would not be writing this submission. The fact is, it is not the only option. Another, better option exists in renewable energy, and I submit that in a much shorter time than it would take to establish a nuclear industry in South Australia, the world will be turning to renewables in force while eschewing nuclear energy.
  • Citizens' Jury

    Citizens' Jury

    SUNDAY VERSION South Australia’s Citizens’ Jury on Nuclear Waste Final Report November 2016 “Under what circumstances, if any, could South Australia pursue the opportunity to store and dispose of nuclear waste from other countries?” Jury Summary Statement The Citizens Jury would like to Acknowledge that we have been meeting on Kaurna land and we pay our respects to the Traditional owners, past and present, across South Australia. The jury generally had a strong conviction in taking a position one way or another. Two thirds of the jury do not wish to pursue the opportunity under any circumstances and one third support a commitment to pursue under the circumstances outlined in this report. Introduction: Citizen’s Jury 2 (CJ2) was a group of 350 residents of South Australia who were brought together under the remit of discussing and reporting on the question: “Under what circumstances, if any, could South Australia pursue the opportunity to store and dispose of high level nuclear waste from other countries?”. To be clear, the jury considered only high-level nuclear waste. The people on Citizen’s Jury Two were selected to be broadly representative of the population of South Australia based on demographics (as best as was possible based on the responses to the initial invitation to take part). The 50 jurors from Citizen’s Jury One were also invited back to be part of the second jury process and approximately 30 of them decided to take part in the second jury. On the first day of the jury, we established some guiding principles for how we should approach the process.
  • Zoos SA Annual Report 2011-12

    Zoos SA Annual Report 2011-12

    zoossa.com.au zoossa.com.au Passion We inspire and influence through our valuable conservation efforts and recognise success. Effectiveness We focus on clearly defined shared goals and support people to achieve them. Innovation We seek creative ways to achieve goals and promote a culture of learning and improving. Integrity We are guided by our values and deliver on our promises. Respect We respect individual’s values and encourage a culture of collaboration, listening and trust. President’s Report .......................................2 CEO’s Report ............................................4 Board Members ...........................................6 List of Achievements ...................................7 The Animals ...........................................11 Conservation ............................................20 Education ................................................23 Sustainability ...........................................24 Visitation .................................................26 Communications & Development .................28 Our People ..............................................34 Assets & Infrastructure ..............................41 Life Members ...........................................42 Finance ...................................................54 AGM Minutes (2011) ................................59 SGM Minutes (2012) .................................62 Zoos South Australia Annual Report 2011/12 1 President’s Report Dusky Langur here is no question that the the overall direction of the business.
  • Liquor Licensing Act 1997— Geographical Names Act 1991— (No

    Liquor Licensing Act 1997— Geographical Names Act 1991— (No

    No. 81 5191 THE SOUTH AUSTRALIAN GOVERNMENT GAZETTE www.governmentgazette.sa.gov.au PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY ALL PUBLIC ACTS appearing in this GAZETTE are to be considered official, and obeyed as such ADELAIDE, THURSDAY, 19 NOVEMBER 2009 CONTENTS Page Page Acts Assented To..................................................................... 5192 Mining Act 1971—Notices ..................................................... 5203 Appointments, Resignations, Etc............................................. 5192 National Parks and Wildlife (National Parks) Regulations Controlled Substances Act 1984—Notice ............................... 5193 2001—Notice....................................................................... 5204 Corporations and District Councils—Notices.......................... 5226 Petroleum and Geothermal Energy Act 2000—Notices .......... 5204 Crown Lands Act 1929—Notice ............................................. 5193 Proclamations .......................................................................... 5214 Development Act 1993—Notice ............................................. 5194 Public Trustee Office—Administration of Estates .................. 5244 Electoral Act 1985—Notice .................................................... 5194 Environment Protection Act 1993—Notices ........................... 5196 REGULATIONS Gas Act 1997—Notice ............................................................ 5194 Liquor Licensing Act 1997— Geographical Names Act 1991— (No. 267 of 2009)............................................................
  • Volume 40, Number 1 the ADELAIDE LAW REVIEW Law.Adelaide.Edu.Au Adelaide Law Review ADVISORY BOARD

    Volume 40, Number 1 the ADELAIDE LAW REVIEW Law.Adelaide.Edu.Au Adelaide Law Review ADVISORY BOARD

    Volume 40, Number 1 THE ADELAIDE LAW REVIEW law.adelaide.edu.au Adelaide Law Review ADVISORY BOARD The Honourable Professor Catherine Branson AC QC Deputy Chancellor, The University of Adelaide; Former President, Australian Human Rights Commission; Former Justice, Federal Court of Australia Emeritus Professor William R Cornish CMG QC Emeritus Herchel Smith Professor of Intellectual Property Law, University of Cambridge His Excellency Judge James R Crawford AC SC International Court of Justice The Honourable Professor John J Doyle AC QC Former Chief Justice, Supreme Court of South Australia Professor John V Orth William Rand Kenan Jr Professor of Law, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Professor Emerita Rosemary J Owens AO Former Dean, Adelaide Law School The Honourable Justice Melissa Perry Federal Court of Australia Emeritus Professor Ivan Shearer AM RFD Sydney Law School The Honourable Margaret White AO Former Justice, Supreme Court of Queensland Professor John M Williams Dame Roma Mitchell Chair of Law and Former Dean, Adelaide Law School ADELAIDE LAW REVIEW Editors Associate Professor Matthew Stubbs and Dr Michelle Lim Book Review and Comment Editor Dr Stacey Henderson Associate Editors Charles Hamra, Kyriaco Nikias and Azaara Perakath Student Editors Joshua Aikens Christian Andreotti Mitchell Brunker Peter Dalrymple Henry Materne-Smith Holly Nicholls Clare Nolan Eleanor Nolan Vincent Rocca India Short Christine Vu Kate Walsh Noel Williams Publications Officer Panita Hirunboot Volume 40 Issue 1 2019 The Adelaide Law Review is a double-blind peer reviewed journal that is published twice a year by the Adelaide Law School, The University of Adelaide. A guide for the submission of manuscripts is set out at the back of this issue.
  • The South Australian Government Gazette

    The South Australian Government Gazette

    No. 10 769 THE SOUTH AUSTRALIAN GOVERNMENT GAZETTE www.governmentgazette.sa.gov.au PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY ALL PUBLIC ACTS appearing in this GAZETTE are to be considered official, and obeyed as such ADELAIDE, THURSDAY, 18 FEBRUARY 2010 CONTENTS Page Page Adelaide Park Lands Act 2005—Notice....................................771 Petroleum and Geothermal Energy Act 2000—Notice.............. 788 Appointments, Resignations, Etc...............................................770 Proclamations ............................................................................ 816 Corporations and District Councils—Notices............................863 Public Trustee Office—Administration of Estates .................... 864 Crown Lands Act 1929—Notice ...............................................771 REGULATIONS Development Act 1993—Notices..............................................771 Development Act 1993 (No. 18 of 2010) .............................. 846 Environment Protection (Waste to Resources) Notice 2010......795 Crown Land Management Act 2009 (No. 19 of 2010) .......... 848 Environment Protection (Waste to Resources) Liquor Licensing Act 1997— Policy 2010—Notice..............................................................796 (No. 20 of 2010)................................................................. 851 Equal Opportunity Tribunal—Notice ........................................771 (No. 21 of 2010)................................................................. 853 Fisheries Management Act 2007—Notices ...............................776
  • The Coorong Lower Lakes and Murray Mouth Directions for a Healthy Future

    The Coorong Lower Lakes and Murray Mouth Directions for a Healthy Future

    The Community Consultation Report: Murray Futures: Lower Lakes & Coorong Recovery Community Consultation Report The Coorong, Lower Lakes and Murray Mouth: Directions for a Healthy Future APPENDICES June 2009 Page 1 The Community Consultation Report: Murray Futures: Lower Lakes & Coorong Recovery Appendices Appendix 1 Promotion - Distribution Points 3 Appendix 2 Promotion - Media Coverage 6 Appendix 3 Promotion - Advertisements & Web Copy 7 Appendix 4 Community Information Sessions – Notes 22 Appendix 5 Community Information Sessions - PowerPoint Presentation 44 Appendix 6 Community Information Sessions - Feedback Survey 49 Appendix 7 Targeted Meetings - Notes 53 Appendix 8 Targeted Meetings - (Example) PowerPoint Presentation 64 Appendix 9 Written Submissions - List 67 Appendix 10 Written Submissions - Summaries 69 Appendix 11On-line Survey Report (from Ehrenberg-Bass) 107 Page 2 The Community Consultation Report: Murray Futures: Lower Lakes & Coorong Recovery Appendix 1 Promotion - Distribution Points Councils: Alexandrina Council Coorong District Council Strathalbyn Council Office Coorong District Council (Tailem Bend and Tintinara) Mt Barker District Council Rural City of Murray Bridge Libraries: Coomandook Community Library DEWHA Library Goolwa Public Library Meningie Community Library Mount Barker Community Library Mt Compass Library Murray Bridge Library National Library of Australia ACT Library Port Elliot Library SA Parliamentary Library State Library Adelaide Strathalbyn Community Library Tailem Bend Community Library Tintinara