STUDY GUIDE Inside

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

STUDY GUIDE Inside Wurtele Thrust Stage / Feb 11 – Apr 2, 2017 by WILLIAM SHAKESPEARE STUDY GUIDE Inside THE PLAYWRIGHT Comments About the Playwright • 3 A Selected Chronology of the Life and Times of William Shakespeare • 6 THE PLAY Synopsis, Characters and Setting • 9 Comments on Some of the Characters • 10 Responses to King Lear • 12 Sources of the Play • 15 Another Version of the story of King Lear • 17 CULTURAL CONTEXT The Language of the Play • 18 Edgar’s Demons • 19 Selected Glossary of Terms • 20 THE GUTHRIE PRODUCTION Notes from the Creative Team • 24 The Role of a Lifetime • 26 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION For Further Understanding • 28 This activity is made possible by The Guthrie Theater’s production the voters of Minnesota through is part of Shakespeare in American a Minnesota State Arts Board Communities, a program of the Operating Support grant, thanks to National Endowment for the Arts Play guides are made possible by a legislative appropriation from the in partnership with Arts Midwest. arts and cultural heritage fund. Guthrie Theater Study Guide Copyright 2016 DRAMATURG Carla Steen GRAPHIC DESIGNER Akemi Graves RESEARCH Belinda Westmaas Jones, Madeline Kvale, Carla Steen All rights reserved. With the exception of classroom use by teachers and individual personal use, no part of this Play Guide may be reproduced in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying or recording, or by an information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers. Some materials Guthrie Theater, 818 South 2nd Street, Minneapolis, MN 55415 published herein are written especially for our Guide. Others are reprinted ADMINISTRATION 612.225.6000 by permission of their publishers. BOX OFFICE 612.377.2224 or 1.877.44.STAGE TOLL-FREE guthrietheater.org • Joseph Haj, artistic director To request permission to reprint or republish portions of this guide: Jo Holcomb: 612.225.6117 | Carla Steen: 612.225.6118 The Guthrie Theater, founded in 1963, is an American center for theater performance, The Guthrie Theater receives support from the National Endowment production, education and professional training. By presenting both classical literature and for the Arts. This activity is made possible in part by the Minnesota State Arts Board, through an appropriation by the Minnesota State new work from diverse cultures, the Guthrie illuminates the common humanity connecting Legislature. The Minnesota State Arts Board received additional funds to Minnesota to the peoples of the world. support this activity from the National Endowment for the Arts. 2 \ GUTHRIE THEATER THE PLAYWRIGHT The Playwright William Shakespeare William Shakespeare not only English, but also Latin country gentleman. Shakespeare and Greek. In 1582, Shakespeare died there – on what is thought to was born in 1564 married Anne Hathaway, and the be his birthday, April 23, in 1616. and raised in Stratford– couple would have three children. He is buried in the parish church, upon–Avon, in Shakespeare moved to London by where his grave can be seen to 1592 and quickly began to make this day. His known body of work England’s West a name for himself as a prolific includes 37 plays, 100 long poems Country. playwright. He stayed in London and 154 sonnets. for about 20 years, becoming As the son of an up–and–coming more and more successful in town merchant, Shakespeare his work as an actor, writer, and would have attended the village shareholder in his acting company. grammar school where he would His retirement took him back have learned to read and write to Stratford to lead the life of a GUTHRIE THEATER \ 3 THE PLAYWRIGHT Comments about the Playwright And Shakespeare thou, for all our modern music: he wrote Shakespeare’s mind whose honey-flowing vein, the text of modern life. is the type of the Pleasing the world, androgynous, of the thy praises doth obtain, … Ralph Waldo Emerson, Representative Live ever you, Men, 1841 man-woman mind. at least in fame live ever. … It is fatal for anyone Well may the body die, who writes to think but fame dies never. No other poet has given so many- sided an expression to human of their sex. It is Richard Barnfield, A Remembrance of nature, or rendered so many fatal to be a man or Some English Poets, 1598 passions and moods with such a woman pure and an appropriate variety of style, simple; one must sentiment and accent. If, therefore, He has a magic power over words: we were asked to select one be woman-manly or they come winged at his bidding; monument of human civilization man-womanly. and seem to know their places. that should survive to some They are struck out in a heat, on future age, or be transported to Virginia Woolf, A Room of One’s Own, 1929 the spur of the occasion, and have another planet to bear witness to all the truth and vividness which the inhabitants there of what we arise from an actual impression have been upon earth, we should If one takes those thirty-seven of the objects. His epithets and probably choose the works of plays with all the radar lines of single phrases are like sparkles, Shakespeare. the different viewpoints of the thrown off from an imagination, different characters, one comes fired by the whirling rapidity of George Santayana, Interpretations of out with a field of incredible its own motion. His language Poetry and Religion, 1900 density and complexity; and is hieroglyphical. It translates eventually one goes a step further, thoughts into visible images. It and one finds that what happened, abounds in sudden transitions and We do not understand Shakespeare what passed through this man elliptical expressions. from a single reading, and certainly called Shakespeare and came into not from a single play. There is a existence on sheets of paper, is William Hazlitt, Lecture on the English relation between the various plays something quite different from Poets, 1818 of Shakespeare, taken in order; and any other author’s work. It’s not it is work of years to venture even Shakespeare’s view of the world, one individual interpretation of the it’s something which actually He is like some saint whose pattern in Shakespeare’s carpet. resembles reality. A sign of this history is to be rendered into all is that any single word, line, languages, into verse and prose, T. S. Eliot, Dante, Faber & Faber, 1929 character or event has not only a into songs and pictures and cut up large number of interpretations, into proverbs; so that the occasion but an unlimited number. Which which gave the saint’s meaning the is the characteristic of reality. … form of conversation, or of a prayer, An artist may try to capture and or of a code of laws, is immaterial reflect your action, but actually he compared with the universality of interprets it – so that a naturalistic its application. … He wrote the airs painting, a Picasso painting, a 4 \ GUTHRIE THEATER photograph, are all interpretations. if you recall your salad days, Shakespeare has two sides to him: But in itself, the action of one you are quoting Shakespeare; if one is the historical side, where man touching his head is open you act more in sorrow than in he’s one of a group of dramatists to unlimited understanding and anger, if your wish is father to working in Elizabethan London interpretation. In reality, that is. the thought, if your lost property and writing for an audience living What Shakespeare wrote carries has vanished into thin air, you are in that London at that time; the that characteristic. What he wrote quoting Shakespeare; if you have other is the poet who speaks is not interpretations: it is the thing ever refused to budge an inch or to us today with so powerfully itself. suffered from green-eyed jealousy, contemporary a voice. If we study if you have played fast and loose, only the historical, or 1564 – 1616 Brook, Peter. “What is Shakespeare?” (1947), if you have been tongue-tied, a Shakespeare, we take away all his The Shifting Point, New York: Harper & tower of strength, hoodwinked or relevance to our own time and shirk Row, 1987 in a pickle, if you have knitted your trying to look into the greatest brows, made a virtue of necessity, mystery of literature, the mystery insisted on fair play, slept not of how someone can communicate Shakespeare himself, indeed one wink, stood on ceremony, with times and spaces and cultures Shakespeare especially, does danced attendance (on your lord so far removed from his own. not describe from outside; his and master), laughed yourself characters are intimately bound into stitches, had short shrift, cold Northrop Frye, Northrop Frye on up with the audience. That is why comfort or too much of a good Shakespeare, New Haven, Conn.: Yale his plays are the greatest example thing, if you have seen better days University Press, 1986 there is of people’s theater; in this or lived in a fool’s paradise – why, theater the public found and still be that as it may, the more fool finds its own problems and re- you, for it is a foregone conclusion Every age creates its experiences them. that you are (as good luck would have it) quoting Shakespeare; if own Shakespeare. Jean Paul Sartre, Sartre on Theater, 1959 you think it is early days and clear … Like a portrait out bag and baggage, if you think whose eyes seem to it is high time and that that is the Shakespeare can illuminate our long and short of it, if you believe follow you around the knowledge of Western attitudes; that the game is up and that truth room, engaging your an analysis of values can also will come out even if it involves glance from every illuminate some dark corners your own flesh and blood, if you lie angle, [his] plays in Shakespeare’s work.
Recommended publications
  • 19Tf? Annual Colorado Shakespeare 5®Stii>A(
    19tf? Annual Colorado Shakespeare 5®stii>a( The Comedy of Errors • The Tempest • King John DEPARTMENT OF THEATRE AND DANCE c n L n u a n o s rxjkesn«ciK« University of Colorado® Boulder, Colorado 80309 |Zc?sti'waL Summer 1976 Dear Lover of Shakespeare’s Works: Those who truly love Shakespeare in the theatre will be pleased to learn about the CSh A n ­ nual, a scholarly journal devoted to the art of producing Shakespeare for contemporary audi­ ences. Eighteen years of experience performing all the Shakespeare plays in the Mary Rip- pon Theatre leave us with a vivid realization of the extent to which the full appreciation of Shakespeare’s content and craftsmanship is dependent on relating to his work in the context for which it was written—the artistic transaction of theatrical production. A significant part of Shakespeare’s greatness has been his capacity to speak meaningfully and movingly to successive generations and diverse cultures. On whatever pedestals we would put him, we must certainly maintain a place for him in our contemporary theatres. His work calls for actors and scenic artists, stages and audiences. It also warrants the attention of those whose scholarship can reflect their practice of his own theatrical art and their sharing of his commitment to make scripts come alive in the theatre. To stimulate such at­ tention and to make available to others the fruits of such attention—these are the goals of the CSF Annual. The A nnual will grow out of each Colorado Shakespeare Festival. Its basic format will consist of three sections.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Folly and Subversion in Much Ado About Nothing*
    Tiyatro Eleştirmenliği ve Dramaturji Bölümü Dergisi Journal of Theatre Criticism and Dramaturgy Tiyatro Eleştirmenliği ve Dramaturji Bölümü Dergisi 32, (2021): xx-xx DOI: 10.26650/jtcd.861023 Research Article / Araştırma Makalesi Dog’s Day: Natural Folly and Subversion in Much Ado About Nothing* Ben Haworth1 ABSTRACT This essay argues that Shakespeare’s natural fools, clowns, rustics, and buffoons provide far more than light comic relief. Using the example of Dogberry, from Much Ado About Nothing, I demonstrate that in allowing his fools to usurp their position of clownish caricature, to move outside of their normal social spheres, Shakespeare exposes the folly within societal institutions. Though an examination of language, namely the use of malapropisms, and the manipulation of traditional licence extended to natural fools, I contend that such theatrical *This article is prepared with reference to the master dissertation titled “Early Modern depictions of folly opened the way for social commentary, parody and inversions Motley: The Function of Fools and Folly on the of hierarchies of power on the stage. Shakespearean Stage”, completed in 2016 at Keywords: Shakespeare, Subversion, Folly, Malapropism, Dogberry Nottingham Trent University UK. 1Lecturer, Nottingham Trent University, English Faculty, UK ORCID: B.H. 0000-0002-3318-8666 Corresponding author / Sorumlu yazar: Ben Haworth, Lecturer, Nottingham Trent University, English Faculty, UK E-mail/E-posta: [email protected] Submitted/Başvuru: 14.01.2021 Revision Requested/Revizyon Talebi: 05.02.2021 Last Revision Received/Son Revizyon: 05.02.2021 Accepted/Kabul: 15.03.2021 Citation/Atıf: Haworth, Ben. “Dog’s Day: Natural Folly and Subversion in Much Ado About Nothing” Tiyatro Eleştirmenliği ve Dramaturji Bölümü Dergisi 32, (2021): xx-xx.
    [Show full text]
  • Cordelia''s Portrait in the Context of King Lear''s
    Paula M. Rodríguez Gómez Cordelias Portrait in the Context of King Lears... 181 CORDELIAS PORTRAIT IN THE CONTEXT OF KING LEARS INDIVIDUATION* Paula M. Rodríguez Gómez** Abstract: This analysis attempts to show the relations between the individual psyche and the contents of the collective unconscious. Following Von Franzs analytical technique, the tragic action in King Lear will be read as an individuation process that will rescue archetypal contents and solve existential paradoxes that cause an imbalance between the ego and the self, leading to self-destruction. Once communication is eased and balance is restored, the transformation-seeking process that engaged the design of the play itself becomes resolved, and events can be led to a conventional tragic resolution. Jungian analysis will therefore provide a critical framework to unveil the subconscious contents that tear the character of the king between annihilation and survival, the anima complex that affects the king, responding thus for the action of the play and its centuries-old success. Keywords: collective unconscious, myth, individuation, archetype, tragedy, anima. Resumen: Este análisis pretende sacar a la luz las relaciones entre la psyche individual y los contenidos del inconsciente colectivo. Siguiendo la técnica analítica de Von Franz, la acción trágica de King Lear será entendida a través del proceso de individuación que revierte sobre los contenidos arquetípicos y resuelve las paradojas existenciales que cau- san el desequilibrio entre ego y self. Una vez que la comunicación es facilitada y el equilibrio psíquico recuperado, el proceso transformativo que afecta la génesis de la trama se resuelve y el argumento alcanza una resolución convencional.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fools of Shakespeare's Romances
    Sede Amministrativa: Università degli Studi di Padova Dipartimento di Studi Linguistici e Letterari (DISLL) SCUOLA DI DOTTORATO DI RICERCA IN: Scienze Linguistiche, Filologiche e Letterarie INDIRIZZO: Filologie e Letterature Classiche e Moderne CICLO XXVI “Armine... thou art a foole and knaue”: The Fools of Shakespeare’s Romances Direttore della Scuola : Ch.ma Prof.ssa Rosanna Benacchio Supervisore : Ch.ma Prof.ssa Alessandra Petrina Dottoranda : Alice Equestri Abstract La mia tesi propone un’analisi dettagliata dei personaggi comici nei romances Shakespeariani (Pericles, Cymbeline, The Winter’s Tale e The Tempest) in particolare quelli creati appositamente per Robert Armin, attore comico di punta dei King’s Men in quel periodo. Nel primo capitolo traccio la presenza di Armin nei quattro testi, individuando cioè gli indizi che rimandano alla sua figura e alla tipologia di comicità tipica dei suoi personaggi precedenti in Shakespeare e di quelli presenti nelle sue stesse opere. I quattro personaggi creati per lui da Shakespeare vengono analizzati in profondità nei seguenti capitoli, raggruppandoli a seconda dei loro ruoli sociali o professioni. Nel secondo capitolo mi occupo dei fools criminali, considerando Pericles e The Winter’s Tale, dove i personaggi di Boult e Autolycus sono rispettivamente un ruffiano di bordello e un delinquente di strada. Nel terzo capitolo mi concentro invece sui personaggi che esibiscono o vengono discriminati per una reale od imputata deficienza congenita (natural folly): il principe Cloten in Cymbeline e Caliban in The Tempest. Per ciascun caso discuto il rapporto del personaggio con le fonti shakespeariane ed eventualmente con la tradizione comica precedente o contemporanea a Shakespeare, il ruolo all’interno del testo, e il modo in cui il personaggio suscita l’effetto comico.
    [Show full text]
  • CYMBELINE" in the Fllii^Slhi TI CENTURY
    "CYMBELINE" IN THE fllii^SLHi TI CENTURY Bennett Jackson Submitted in partial fulfilment for the de ree of uaster of Arts in the University of Birmingham. October 1971. University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. SYNOPSIS This thesis consists of an Introduction, followed by Part I (chapters 1-2) in which nineteenth- century criticism of the play is discussed, particular attention being paid to Helen Faucit's essay on Imogen, and its relationship to her playing of the role. In Part II the stags-history of Oymbcline in London is traced from 1785 to Irving's Lyceum production of 1896. Directions from promptbooks used by G-.P. Cooke, W.C. Macready, Helen Eaucit, and Samuel ±helps are transcribed and discussed, and in the last chapter the influence of Bernard Shaw on Ellen Terry's Imogen is considered in the light of their correspondence and the actress's rehearsal copies of the play. There are three appendices: a list of performances; transcriptions of two newspaper reviews (from 1843 and 1864) and one private diary (Gordon Crosse's notes on the Lyceum Gymbeline); and discussion of one of the promptbooks prepared for Charles Kean's projected production.
    [Show full text]
  • Sources of Lear
    Meddling with Masterpieces: the On-going Adaptation of King Lear by Lynne Bradley B.A., Queen’s University 1997 M.A., Queen’s University 1998 A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in the Department of English © Lynne Bradley, 2008 University of Victoria All rights reserved. This dissertation may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photo-copying or other means, without the permission of the author. ii Meddling with Masterpieces: the On-going Adaptation of King Lear by Lynne Bradley B.A., Queen’s University 1997 M.A., Queen’s University 1998 Supervisory Committee Dr. Sheila M. Rabillard, Supervisor (Department of English) Dr. Janelle Jenstad, Departmental Member (Department of English) Dr. Michael Best, Departmental Member (Department of English) Dr. Annalee Lepp, Outside Member (Department of Women’s Studies) iii Supervisory Committee Dr. Sheila M. Rabillard, Supervisor (Department of English) Dr. Janelle Jenstad, Departmental Member (Department of English) Dr. Michael Best, Departmental Member (Department of English) Dr. Annalee Lepp, Outside Member (Department of Women’s Studies) Abstract The temptation to meddle with Shakespeare has proven irresistible to playwrights since the Restoration and has inspired some of the most reviled and most respected works of theatre. Nahum Tate’s tragic-comic King Lear (1681) was described as an execrable piece of dementation, but played on London stages for one hundred and fifty years. David Garrick was equally tempted to adapt King Lear in the eighteenth century, as were the burlesque playwrights of the nineteenth. In the twentieth century, the meddling continued with works like King Lear’s Wife (1913) by Gordon Bottomley and Dead Letters (1910) by Maurice Baring.
    [Show full text]
  • On Etymological Insults
    Michael Moore On Etymological Insults Can etymology benefit anyone? Philologists, philosophers and others have spilt gallons of ink over the value of etymological inquiries throughout the ages. We can learn something about the attitude of the ancients toward this issue from the etymology of etymology: “true meaning”. In this age of post-modernist constructivism we view with skepticism such strivings after truth. Indeed, how does it serve contemporary speakers that his clients boycotted Captain Boycott (Irish land agent, d. 1897), but that nobody lynched William Lynch (American vigilante, d. 1820). Or that nowadays one does not need wooden clogs (sabots in 19th century France) to throw into the machinery in order to commit sabotage? And what about popular etymologies (which we could paraphrase as the wrong true meanings of certain words; see de Saussure, 1915/1966, pp. 173-176), whose exposure shows that crayfish have as little to do with fish (from Old French crevice) as Jerusalem artichokes have with Israel’s capital (gira-sole, Italian, meaning "turns toward the sun", related to the common sunflower). The Hebrew Bible provides many additional examples, explaining that Babel (from Akkadian bab-ilu "Gate of God") derives from the Hebrew root b.l.l., confuse (Genesis 11:9), or that Moses' name means "drawn out of the water" (based on the Hebrew root m.sh.h.; Exodus 2:10) rather than on the far more likely Egyptian word mes, mesu 'child, son,' as in Ra-mses (see also Kedar-Kopfstein, 1963). Though etymologies may not have much scientific value, looking into the distant past of Keywords: etymology, ethnocentrism, xenophobia ∏#¡ ¬–√ ⁄ Ω#…—“ ⁄ "åÍ~î" «Ω“»— ⁄ E 25 ⁄ Michael Moore some words provides at the least entertainment, and sometimes even insight.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Szeged Faculty of Arts Doctoral School of English and American Literatures and Cultures
    CB WSf University of Szeged Faculty of Arts Doctoral School of English and American Literatures and Cultures THE VICE-DEVICE: IAGO AND LEAR'S FOOL AS AGENTS OF REPRESENTATIONAL CRISIS PhD THESIS Submitted by Agnes MATUSKA Supervisor Dr. Attila KISS Szeged 2005 THE VICE-DEVICE: IAGO AND LEAR'S FOOL AS AGENTS OF REPRESENTATIONAL CRISIS INTRODUCTION 3 1. THEORETICAL BACKGROUND, METHODOLOGY 11 1. L THE QUESTION OF EPISTEMOLOGICAL CRISIS 12 1.2 DIALECTICAL TRAGEDY: EPISTEMIC CHANGE IN THEATRE 21 1.3 "IF ACODE IS CRUMBLING..." 25 1.4 REPRESENTATIONAL CRISIS IN SHAKESPEARE 28 2. HAPHAZARDLY AMBIDEXTROUS: THE VICE-FAMILY 35 2. L PROBLEMS OF DEFINITION 35 "YOU WILL LEARN TO PLAYE THE VICE": PROBLEMS OF INTERPRETATION 37 2.2 VICES 48 Merry Report 49 Ambidexter 52 Haphazard 56 Punisher or punished? 60 The Fool in the Vice 66 2.3. VICE-SUCCESSORS AND FOOLS 72 Intriguer villains 73 Sir John Falstaff: The Vice-Fool 77 The "corrupter of-words": Feste 81 Deceiver among deceivers: Parolles 85 Afterlife of post-vices and the common life of lago and the Fool 87 2.4. THE VICE-CLOWN ON THE SHAKESPEAREAN STAGE 91 3. METADRAMA 97 3. L METADRAMA AND THE VICE, A DEFINITION OF THE TERM 97 3.1.1 The Vice as mediator 97 3.1.2 Metadrama in Shakespeare-criticism 102 3.2 MEANING AS AN EVENT - IAGO AND METADRAMA IN OTHELLO 107 3.2.1 Commenting on drama, involving the audience 109 3.2.2 Iago's book of identity and role-playing 110 3.2.3 Plays -within - Iago as director 117 3.2.4 Representation as fiction 121 3.2.5 Iago's metadramatic effect—summary 122 3.3 METADRAMATIC ASPECTS OF THE FOOL 124 3.3.1 The Fool and his audience 125 3.3.2 "All thy other titles " 127 3.3.3 Plays of the fool -within and without.
    [Show full text]
  • CHARLES FUSSELL: CYMBELINE CHARLES FUSSELL B
    CHARLES FUSSELL: CYMBELINE CHARLES FUSSELL b. 1938 CYMBELINE: DRAMA AFTER SHAKESPEARE (1984, rev. 1996) CYMBELINE [1] I. Prelude 4:03 [2] II. Duet: Imogen and Posthumus 3:26 [3] III. Interlude 1:39 [4] IV. Aria: Iachimo 1:10 [5] V. Imogen 3:39 [6] VI. Scene with Arias: Iachimo 10:19 [7] VII. Interlude 2:14 [8] VIII. Scene: Cloten 1:21 [9] IX. Song: Cloten 3:22 [10] X. Recitative and Arioso: Imogen and Belarius 3:04 ALIANA DE LA GUARDIA soprano [11] XI. Duet, Dirge: Guiderius and Arviragus 3:58 MATTHEW DiBATTISTA tenor [12] XII. Battle with Victory March 4:05 DAVID SALSBERY FRY narrator [13] XIII. Scene: Ghosts (Mother and Sicilius) and Jupiter 5:17 [14] XIV. Duet: Imogen and Posthumus 3:07 BOSTON MODERN ORCHESTRA PROJECT [15] XV. Finale: Soothsayer and Cymbeline 4:14 Gil Rose, conductor TOTAL 55:02 COMMENT By Charles Fussell The idea of a musical depiction of this work came as a result of seeing the Hartford Stage productions of Shakespeare. Their Cymbeline, directed by Mark Lamos (who later moved to opera), ended with an unforgettable scene between Imogen and her husband: “Why did you throw your wedded lady from you? Think that you are upon a rock and throw me again.” His reply, “Hang there like fruit, my soul, till the tree die.” This exchange touched me deeply and really convinced me to try some music for the songs that appear in the play as well as this beautiful expression of love. I noticed the familiar “Hark, hark the lark” was sung by the frightful Cloten.
    [Show full text]
  • Shakespeare As an Important Revolution in Literature
    Research Journal of English Language and Literature (RJELAL) A Peer Reviewed (Refereed) International Journal Vol.5.Issue 3. 2017 Impact Factor 6.8992 (ICI) http://www.rjelal.com; (July-Sept) Email:[email protected] ISSN:2395-2636 (P); 2321-3108(O) RE VIEW ARTICLE SHAKESPEARE AS AN IMPORTANT REVOLUTION IN LITERATURE GITA K GUPTA1, MD. RASHID KHAN2 1Research Supervisor Professor Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University Bhagalpur 2Research Scholar Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University Bhagalpur ABSTRACT The expression “Art of Shakespeare” has led to innumerable discussion. The band of critics maintains that there was nobody as Shakespeare, ever-green star of genre. The mysterious personality was a handsome well-shaped person, fine company, and of a ready and pleasant smooth wit. He was extremely lovable, fervent talker kind considerate, everyone realized perfectly at home in his company. The present paper throws light , how could a simple and unlettered man as Shakespeare could be an author of such wonderful plays .How his unique style his diction with wisdom has brought a revolution in English literature. In a world where the quality of the art form called "writing" is so frequently said to be hurriedly diminishing, it is essential for scholars of English literature to preserve some studies of the factual classics, such as Shakespeare. Key words: Encouragement, Penetration, Inspiration, revolution, Importance. Introduction and latest discovered words or term have passed We think of Shakespeare as the top writer into day after day usage in English and other in the history of English language literature. But languages3. His style on world literature was during his lifetime London was full of writers, some dubiously superior to any other writer.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Seminar Abstracts: the King's Men and Their Playwrights
    1 2019 Seminar Abstracts: The King’s Men and Their Playwrights Meghan C. Andrews, Lycoming College James J. Marino, Cleveland State University “Astonishing Presence”: Writing for a Boy Actress of the King’s Men, c. 1610-1616 Roberta Barker, Dalhousie University Although scholarship has acknowledged the influence of leading actors such as Richard Burbage on the plays created for the King’s Men, less attention has been paid to the ways in which the gifts and limitations of individual boy actors may have affected the company’s playwrights. Thanks to the work of scholars such as David Kathman and Martin Wiggins, however, it is now more feasible than ever to identify the periods during which specific boys served their apprenticeships with the company and the plays in which they likely performed. Building on that scholarship, my paper will focus on the repertoire of Richard Robinson (c.1597-1648) during his reign as one of the King’s Men’s leading actors of female roles. Surviving evidence shows that Robinson played the Lady in Middleton’s Second Maiden’s Tragedy in 1611 and that he appeared in Jonson’s Catiline (1611) and Fletcher’s Bonduca (c.1612-14). Using a methodology first envisioned in 1699, when one of the interlocutors in James Wright’s Historia Histrionica dreamt of reconstructing the acting of pre-Civil War London by “gues[sing] at the action of the Men, by the Parts which we now read in the Old Plays” (3), I work from this evidence to suggest that Robinson excelled in the roles of nobly born, defiant tragic heroines: women of “astonishing presence,” as Helvetius says of the Lady in The Second Maiden’s Tragedy (2.1.74).
    [Show full text]
  • MANY MOTIVES: GEOFFREY of MONMOUTH and the REASONS for HIS FALSIFICATION of HISTORY John J. Berthold History 489 April 23, 2012
    MANY MOTIVES: GEOFFREY OF MONMOUTH AND THE REASONS FOR HIS FALSIFICATION OF HISTORY John J. Berthold History 489 April 23, 2012 i ABSTRACT This paper examines The History of the Kings of Britain by Geoffrey of Monmouth, with the aim of understanding his motivations for writing a false history and presenting it as genuine. It includes a brief overview of the political context of the book at the time during which it was first introduced to the public, in order to help readers unfamiliar with the era to understand how the book fit into the world of twelfth century England, and why it had the impact that it did. Following that is a brief summary of the book itself, and finally a summary of the secondary literature as it pertains to Geoffrey’s motivations. It concludes with the claim that all proposed motives are plausible, and may all have been true at various points in Geoffrey’s career, as the changing times may have forced him to promote the book for different reasons, and under different circumstances than he may have originally intended. Copyright for this work is owned by the author. This digital version is published by McIntyre Library, University of Wisconsin Eau Claire with the consent of the author. ii CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1 Who was Geoffrey of Monmouth? 3 Historical Context 4 The Book 6 Motivations 11 CONCLUSION 18 WORKS CITED 20 WORKS CONSULTED 22 1 Introduction Sometime between late 1135 and early 1139 Geoffrey of Monmouth released his greatest work, Historia Regum Britanniae (History of the Kings of Britain in modern English).
    [Show full text]