DOCSLIB.ORG

Modelling Water Allocation Increases Using Climate Predictions

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Modelling Water Allocation Increases Using Climate Predictions University of Southern Queensland Faculty of Health, Engineering and Sciences Modelling Water Allocation Increases Using Climate Predictions A dissertation submitted by Mr. Daniel Graham Verrall In fulfilment of the requirements of Bachelor of Engineering (Honours) (Civil) October 2016 ABSTRACT Water allocations in Australia often commence at the start of the year with less than 100% supply and rely on seasonal streamflows into dams throughout the year to meet demand. Therefore more than ever, water allocation models are used with forward planning in order to effectively manage water supply. This dissertation focuses on developing a water allocation model incorporating climate forecasts for Cressbrook Dam, a major water supplier for the regional town of Toowoomba. After determining the best climate index of ENSO, the methodology focussed on identifying a relationship between streamflow and SOI on a monthly and seasonal scale and the creation of the water balance model. To apply the findings of these results, the use of three water management scenarios were then run through the water balance model using an extended streamflow sequence. This analysis indicated that there was a significant correlation in the months of December to March which was further strengthened when looking at a seasonal scale. A consistently positive SOI observed in November suggested that there was a 100% chance that the dam level will substantially increase and this to develop alternative water management scenarios that raised restrictions when this SOI phase was observed. By raising restrictions early, these management scenarios achieved a reduction of around 280 days from level 5 water restrictions which would have relieved the residents of Toowoomba during a major drought period. However, the raising of restrictions also resulted in lowering the dam level to a critical low volume. This unexpected response in dam level storage was identified due to a short streamflow record available. The development of the water management scenarios were based off a limited range of historical climate variability, therefore recognising that a large streamflow record is crucial to developing water management strategies which incorporate decisions based off climate events on the past. ii LIMITATIONS OF USE The Council of the University of Southern Queensland, its Faculty of Health, Engineering & Sciences, and the staff of the University of Southern Queensland, do not accept any responsibility for the truth, accuracy or completeness of material contained within or associated with this dissertation. Persons using all or any part of this material do so at their own risk, and not at the risk of the Council of the University of Southern Queensland, its Faculty of Health, Engineering & Sciences or the staff of the University of Southern Queensland. This dissertation reports an educational exercise and has no purpose or validity beyond this exercise. The sole purpose of the course pair entitled “Research Project” is to contribute to the overall education within the student’s chosen degree program. This document, the associated hardware, software, drawings, and other material set out in the associated appendices should not be used for any other purpose: if they are so used, it is entirely at the risk of the user. iii CERTIFICATION I certify that the ideas, designs and experimental work, results, analyses and conclusions set out in this dissertation are entirely my own effort, except where otherwise indicated and acknowledged. I further certify that the work is original and has not been previously submitted for assessment in any other course or institution, except where specifically stated. Daniel Verrall Student Number: 0061046399 iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to acknowledge the following people: This project would not have been possible without the continual support from my family and friends who have been with me from my first day at the University of Southern Queensland. Many thanks go out to my supervisor Justine Baillie, for her continuous time, help and effort. Weekly meetings and even meetings on weekends are just a small demonstration of her devotion to this project and is very much appreciated. v Table of Contents ABSTRACT ................................................................................................... ii LIMITATIONS OF USE .............................................................................. iii CERTIFICATION......................................................................................... iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................................................... v Table of Contents .......................................................................................... vi List of Figures ................................................................................................ x List of Tables................................................................................................ xii Nomenclature and Acronyms ...................................................................... xiii CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................ 1 1.1 Background...................................................................................... 1 1.2 Aim and Objectives ......................................................................... 2 1.3 Justification of Project ..................................................................... 3 1.4 Dissertation Outline ......................................................................... 3 CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW ..................................................... 5 2.1 Introduction ..................................................................................... 5 2.2 Statistical Predictions for Water Allocation Increases .................... 5 2.3 Climate Indices ................................................................................ 6 2.3.1 Madden-Julian Oscillation (MJO)............................................ 7 2.3.2 Tropical Cyclones .................................................................. 10 2.3.3 Atmospheric Blocking ........................................................... 12 2.3.4 East Coast Lows ..................................................................... 14 2.3.5 Indian Ocean Dipole .............................................................. 15 2.3.6 Inter-Decadal Pacific Oscillation (IPO) ................................. 16 2.3.7 Southern Annular Mode (SAM)............................................. 17 2.3.8 El-Nino Southern Oscillation (ENSO) ................................... 19 vi 2.3.9 Summary of Key Findings ..................................................... 24 2.4 Urban Water Storage Management – Risk .................................... 25 CHAPTER 3 METHODOLOGY ............................................................. 27 3.1 Introduction ................................................................................... 27 3.2 Hydrologic Analysis of Water Supply Systems ............................ 27 3.3 Water Balance Model .................................................................... 31 3.3.1 Behaviour Analysis ................................................................ 32 3.3.2 Storage volume at the end of the previous day (푺풕 − ퟏ) ....... 33 3.3.3 Volume of stream inflow on day t (푸풕) ................................. 34 3.3.4 Volume of direct rainfall onto the dam on day t (푷풕) ............ 34 3.3.5 Volume of water evaporated from the dam on day t (푬풕) ...... 35 3.3.6 Volume of water infiltrated through seepage on day t (푰풕) .... 36 3.3.7 Volume of water drafted from the dam on day t (푫풕)............ 37 3.3.8 Volume of water spilt on day t (푳풕) ....................................... 37 3.3.9 Volume of Water Released from the Dam on Day t (푹풕) ...... 38 3.3.10 Surface Storage Area.............................................................. 39 3.4 Streamflow and ENSO Relationships ........................................... 39 3.4.1 Monthly Streamflow and ENSO Relationships ..................... 40 3.4.2 Seasonal Streamflow and ENSO Relationships ..................... 41 3.4.3 Seasonal Cumulative Probability Distributions ..................... 41 3.5 Combined Water Balance Model with ENSO Relationships ........ 42 3.6 Scenarios........................................................................................ 43 3.6.1 Scenario 1 ............................................................................... 43 3.6.2 Scenario 2 ............................................................................... 45 3.6.3 Scenario 3 ............................................................................... 46 3.6.4 Development of Streamflows for Scenarios .......................... 47 CHAPTER 4 RESULTS FOR STATISTICAL STREAMFLOW FORECAST MODEL .................................................................................. 49 vii 4.1 Introduction ................................................................................... 49 4.2 Monthly Streamflow and ENSO Analysis .................................... 49 4.3 Seasonal Streamflow and ENSO Analysis .................................... 51 4.4 Seasonal Cumulative Probability Distribution Analysis ............... 52 4.5 Cumulative Probability Distribution Analysis of End of Season Storage Levels .......................................................................................... 55 4.5.1 90% Starting Storage Capacity .............................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Hydrological Advice to Commission of Inquiry Regarding 2010/11 Queensland Floods
    Hydrological Advice to Commission of Inquiry Regarding 2010/11 Queensland Floods TOOWOOMBA AND LOCKYER VALLEY FLASH FLOOD EVENTS OF 10 AND 11 JANUARY 2011 Report to Queensland Floods Commission of Inquiry Revision 1 12 April 2011 Hydrological Advice to Commission of Inquiry Regarding 2010/11 Queensland Floods TOOWOOMBA AND LOCKYER VALLEY FLASH FLOOD EVENTS OF 10 AND 11 JANUARY 2011 Revision 1 11 April 2011 Sinclair Knight Merz ABN 37 001 024 095 Cnr of Cordelia and Russell Street South Brisbane QLD 4101 Australia PO Box 3848 South Brisbane QLD 4101 Australia Tel: +61 7 3026 7100 Fax: +61 7 3026 7300 Web: www.skmconsulting.com COPYRIGHT: The concepts and information contained in this document are the property of Sinclair Knight Merz Pty Ltd. Use or copying of this document in whole or in part without the written permission of Sinclair Knight Merz constitutes an infringement of copyright. LIMITATION: This report has been prepared on behalf of and for the exclusive use of Sinclair Knight Merz Pty Ltd’s Client, and is subject to and issued in connection with the provisions of the agreement between Sinclair Knight Merz and its Client. Sinclair Knight Merz accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for or in respect of any use of or reliance upon this report by any third party. Toowoomba and the Lockyer Valley Flash Flood Events of 10 and 11 January 2011 Contents 1 Executive Summary 1 1.1 Description of Flash Flooding in Toowoomba and the Lockyer Valley1 1.2 Capacity of Existing Flood Warning Systems 2 1.3 Performance of Warnings
    [Show full text]
  • The Monthly Dispatch
    MATES 4 MATES SPECIAL EDITION APRIL 2020 The Monthly Dispatch INSIDE APRIL Mates 4 Mates Important Topics COVIDSAFE App Current Tenders Q&A New Staff Staff Anniversaries Birthdays Photo Comp TOO WIRED We know that 85 – 90% of all mental health illnesses relate to SOME LAIRY SHIRTS TO WORK? issues outside of the workplace. These have the flow affect to SENDING A VERY NEED HELP TO GET impact on your work activities. IMPORTANT MESSAGE By voicing any concerns either BACK ON TRACK? personally or professionally, it allows You’ll see our ambassadors getting us to keep our workplaces safer. around in some very bright shirts We’re here to talk. Here’s what you need to know: (to say the least) but we love them! Driven by staff for staff, last week Do you know why? • Our free EAP with Renew across all sites we launched our The brain child of two tradies, new internal support initiative remains in place for professional help Dan from Sydney and Ed from Mates 4 Mates. Longreach, they soon developed An idea originating from our QHSE • Conversations remain a mateship that would be a life Manager, Gary Lancaster, brought 100% private changer. In 2016, Dan heard the to life by these eight ambassadors • Being ‘manly’ means nothing. news that another best mate of his Toby, Brynsie, Krysta, Todd, Taegan, Ask for help when you need it suddenly and unexpectedly took his Geoff, Coops and Mark. own life. • Our industry has one of the They put their hands up to support highest suicide rates, let’s From this experience, they the initiative and we’ve trained support our workmates co‑founded the Australian workwear them up ready to go.
    [Show full text]
  • Debbie Best - Statement and Exhibits Dated 1 February 2012 Ourref: Doc 1837293
    Debbie Best - Statement and exhibits dated 1 February 2012 Ourref: Doc 1837293 30 January 2012 Debbie Best Deputy Director-General Department of Environment and Resource Management GPO Box 2454 Brisbane QLD 4001 REQUIR EMENT TO PROVIDE STATEMENT TO COMMISSION OF INQUIRY I, Justice Catherine E Holmes, Commissioner of Inquiry, pursuant to section 5(1)(d) of the Commissions of Inquiry Act 1950 (Qld), require Debbie Best to provide a written statement, under oath or affirmation, to the Queensland Floods Commission of Inquiry, in which the said the Debbie Best gives an account of: 1. her understanding, in the period between 7 January 2011 to 12 January 2011, of which flood operations strategies , referred to in the 'Manual of Operational Procedures for Flood Mitigation at Wivenhoe Dam and Somerset Dam', were used in the operation of Wivenhoe Dam between 7 January 2011 and 12 January 2011 and the times at which each strategy was in use 2. how, if at all, that understanding changed since 12 January 2011 and the reason for the change in understanding 3. her understanding of any differences between the account of the choice and timing of the dam operations strategies employed to manage the flood event in the SEQ Water Grid Manager and Seqwater Ministerial Briefing Note to the Minister for Natural Resources, Mines and Energy and Minister for Trade that appears as attachment SR-12 to Exhibit 11 before the Queensland Floods Commission of Inquiry ('January Report') and the Seqwater report titled 'January 2011 Flood Event - Report on the operation of Somerset Dam and Wivenhoe Dam' and dated 2 March 2011 that appears as Exhibit 24 before the Queensland Floods Commission of Inquiry ('March Report') 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Phillips, B 2003, Managing Fish Translocation and Stocking in The
    Managing Fish Translocation & Stocking in the Murray-Darling Basin Statement, recommendations and supporting papers Workshop held in Canberra 25-26 September 2002 Managing Fish Translocation and Stocking in the Murray-Darling Basin workshop held in Canberra, 25-26 September 2002: Statement, recommendations and supporting papers. Phillips, Bill (Compiler), February 2003 © WWF Australia 2003. All Rights Reserved. For in depth information on all our work, go on-line at www.wwf.org.au or call our toll free number 1800 032 551. Head Office WWF Australia GPO Box 528 Sydney NSW Australia Tel: +612-9281-5515 Fax: +612-9281-1060 [email protected] WWF Australia Report; 03/02 ISBN 1-875941-42-8 Compiled by Bill Phillips, MainStream Environmental Consulting designed by Printed and bound by Union Offset Printers For copies of this report or a full list of WWF Australia publications on a wide range of conservation issues, please contact us on [email protected] or call (02) 9281 5515. Managing Fish Translocation and Stocking in the Murray-Darling Basin Workshop held in Canberra 25-26 September 2002 Statement, recommendations and supporting papers Acknowledgements The Managing fish translocation and stocking in the Murray-Darling Basin workshop would not have been possible without the financial support of the Murray-Darling Basin Commission, NSW Fisheries and the Queensland Department of Primary Industries, and WWF Australia and the Inland Rivers Network (IRN) gratefully acknowledges this support. Many thanks to those who assisted in the organisation of the workshop, particularly Bernadette O’Leary, Bill Phillips, Mark Lintermans, John Harris, Alex McNee, Jim Barrett and Greg Williams.
    [Show full text]
  • Drinking Water Quality Management Plan Lakes Wivenhoe and Somerset, Mid-Brisbane River and Catchments
    Drinking Water Quality Management Plan Lakes Wivenhoe and Somerset, Mid-Brisbane River and Catchments April 2010 Peter Schneider, Mike Taylor, Marcus Mulholland and James Howey Acknowledgements Development of this plan benefited from guidance by the Queensland Water Commission Expert Advisory Panel (for issues associated with purified recycled water), Heather Uwins, Peter Artemieff, Anne Woolley and Lynne Dixon (Queensland Department of Environment and Resource Management), Nicole Davis and Rose Crossin (SEQ Water Grid Manager) and Annalie Roux (WaterSecure). The authors thank the following Seqwater staff for their contributions to this plan: Michael Bartkow, Jonathon Burcher, Daniel Healy, Arran Canning and Peter McKinnon. The authors also thank Seqwater staff who contributed to the supporting documentation to this plan. April 2010 Q-Pulse Database Reference: PLN-00021 DRiNkiNg WateR QuALiTy MANAgeMeNT PLAN Executive Summary Obligations and Objectives 8. Contribute to safe recreational opportunities for SEQ communities; The Wivenhoe Drinking Water Quality Management Plan (WDWQMP) provides a framework to 9. Develop effective communication, sustainably manage the water quality of Lakes documentation and reporting mechanisms; Wivenhoe and Somerset, Mid-Brisbane River and and catchments (the Wivenhoe system). Seqwater has 10. Remain abreast of relevant national and an obligation to manage water quality under the international trends in public health and Queensland Water Supply (Safety and Reliability) water management policies, and be actively Act 2008. All bulk water supply and treatment involved in their development. services have been amalgamated under Seqwater as part of the recent institutional reforms for water To ensure continual improvement and compliance supply infrastructure and management in South with the Water Supply (Safety and Reliability) East Queensland (SEQ).
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Calibration of a Hydrologic and Hydrodynamic Model of the Lower Brisbane River
    Joint Calibration of a Hydrologic and Hydrodynamic Model of the Lower Brisbane River TECHNICAL REPORT Version 1 24 June 2011 Joint Calibration of a Hydrologic and Hydrodynamic Model of the Lower Brisbane River TECHNICAL REPORT Version 1 24 June 2011 Sinclair Knight Merz Web: www.skmconsulting.com COPYRIGHT: The concepts and information contained in this document are the property of Sinclair Knight Merz Pty Ltd. Use or copying of this document in whole or in part without the written permission of Sinclair Knight Merz constitutes an infringement of copyright. LIMITATION: This report has been prepared on behalf of and for the exclusive use of Sinclair Knight Merz Pty Ltd’s Client, and is subject to and issued in connection with the provisions of the agreement between Sinclair Knight Merz and its Client. Sinclair Knight Merz accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for or in respect of any use of or reliance upon this report by any third party. The SKM logo trade mark is a registered trade mark of Sinclair Knight Merz Pty Ltd. Technical Report Contents 1. Introduction 1 2. Study Area and Data Availability 2 2.1. Study Area 2 2.2. Data Availability 3 3. Hydrologic Modelling 6 3.1. WT42 model 6 3.2. URBS model 8 3.3. January 2011 Rainfall Inputs 10 3.3.1. Method for deriving sub-area rainfalls 10 3.3.2. Review of rainfall data 10 3.3.3. Rainfall gauge locations 11 3.3.4. Sub-area rainfalls 12 3.4. Initial Calibration of hydrologic models to January 2011 Event 14 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Queensland's Home Waterwise Rebate Scheme
    CASE PROGRAM 2010-65.3 Queensland’s Home WaterWise Rebate Scheme (Epilogue) Would South East Queensland’s “world-class water-savers” stay true to their conservation ideals when storage dams were overflowing? This was a key question for Queensland Premier Anna Bligh and her Government as they contemplated the latest version of the 50- year strategy for the state’s water supply security. The strategy was first drafted during the record-setting “Millennium Drought” and at a time of healthy budget surplus. It was prepared by the Queensland Water Commission (QWC), the independent statutory authority established in 2006 to carry out radical reform of water supply and distribution in South East Queensland. The QWC took control of water supply systems previously owned by 18 different local governments, and committed the state to fast-tracking the $9 billion development of a new “water grid” of pipelines to link existing and new dams with plants to manufacture water by recycling and desalination. It also launched the highly successful “Target 140” which more than halved the pre-drought daily water consumption, with a combination of usage restrictions and the promotion of water-efficient and water-storage appliances through the Home WaterWise Rebate Scheme (HWWRS). Water consumption continued at low levels even after the drought was declared officially over in May 2009, and above-average rainfall drenched the region. By May 2010, most of the dams in South East Queensland were full to overflowing, while the recycling and desalination plants continued to pump out product. However, the state budget was $2 billion in deficit.
    [Show full text]
  • Hansard 16 MARCH 1993
    Legislative Assembly 16 March 1993 2207 TUESDAY, 16 MARCH 1993 Mr SPEAKER (Hon. J. Fouras, Ashgrove) read prayers and took the chair at 10 a.m. PAPERS TABLED DURING RECESS Mr SPEAKER: I advise the House that papers were tabled during the recess in accordance with the list circulated to members in the Chamber. The Clerk of the Parliament— In accordance with sections 46J and 46N of the Financial Administration and Audit Act 1977— 8 March 1993— Annual Report for 1991-92— Grain Research Foundation Explanation for the extension of time for the tabling of an annual report for 1991-92— Grain Research Foundation 10 March 1993— Explanation for the extension of time for the tabling of annual reports for 1991— Barley Marketing Board Central Queensland Grain Sorghum Marketing Board Central Queensland Producers' Co-Operative Association Limited Queensland Barley Growers' Co-Operative Association Limited State Wheat Board Explanation for the extension of time for the tabling of an annual report for the year ended 31 March 1992— Queensland Dairyfarmers' Organisation Explanation for the extension of time for the tabling of an annual report for the year ended 31 May 1992— Atherton Tableland Maize Marketing Board. ADDRESS IN REPLY Presentation Mr SPEAKER: I have to remind honourable members that I propose to present to Her Excellency the Governor at Government House on Wednesday, 17 March, at 12 noon, the Address in Reply to Her Excellency’s Opening Speech agreed to on Thursday, 4 March, and I shall be glad to be accompanied by the mover and the seconder and such other honourable members as care to be present.
    [Show full text]
  • An Economic Assessment of the Value of Recreational Angling at Queensland Dams Involved in the Stocked Impoundment Permit Scheme
    An economic assessment of the value of recreational angling at Queensland dams involved in the Stocked Impoundment Permit Scheme Daniel Gregg and John Rolfe Value of recreational angling in the Queensland SIP scheme Publication Date: 2013 Produced by: Environmental Economics Programme Centre for Environmental Management Location: CQUniversity Australia Bruce Highway North Rockhampton 4702 Contact Details: Professor John Rolfe +61 7 49232 2132 [email protected] www.cem.cqu.edu.au 1 Value of recreational angling in the Queensland SIP scheme Executive Summary Recreational fishing at Stocked Impoundment Permit (SIP) dams in Queensland generates economic impacts on regional economies and provides direct recreation benefits to users. As these benefits are not directly traded in markets, specialist non-market valuation techniques such as the Travel Cost Method are required to estimate values. Data for this study has been collected in two ways in 2012 and early 2013. First, an onsite survey has been conducted at six dams in Queensland, with 804 anglers interviewed in total on their trip and fishing experiences. Second, an online survey has been offered to all anglers purchasing a SIP licence, with 219 responses being collected. The data identifies that there are substantial visit rates across a number of dams in Queensland. For the 31 dams where data was available for this study, recreational anglers purchasing SIP licences have spent an estimated 272,305 days fishing at the dams, spending an average 2.43 days per trip on 2.15 trips per year to spend 4.36 days fishing per angler group. Within those dams there is substantial variation in total fishing effort, with Somerset, Tinaroo, Wivenhoe and North Pine Dam generating more than 20,000 visits per annum.
    [Show full text]
  • Fisheries (Freshwater) Management Plan 1999
    Queensland Fisheries Act 1994 Fisheries (Freshwater) Management Plan 1999 Reprinted as in force on 13 June 2008 Reprint No. 3B This reprint is prepared by the Office of the Queensland Parliamentary Counsel Warning—This reprint is not an authorised copy Information about this reprint This plan is reprinted as at 13 June 2008. The reprint shows the law as amended by all amendments that commenced on or before that day (Reprints Act 1992 s 5(c)). The reprint includes a reference to the law by which each amendment was made—see list of legislation and list of annotations in endnotes. Also see list of legislation for any uncommenced amendments. This page is specific to this reprint. See previous reprints for information about earlier changes made under the Reprints Act 1992. A table of reprints is included in the endnotes. Also see endnotes for information about— • when provisions commenced • editorial changes made in earlier reprints. Spelling The spelling of certain words or phrases may be inconsistent in this reprint due to changes made in various editions of the Macquarie Dictionary. Variations of spelling will be updated in the next authorised reprint. Dates shown on reprints Reprints dated at last amendment All reprints produced on or after 1 July 2002, authorised (that is, hard copy) and unauthorised (that is, electronic), are dated as at the last date of amendment. Previously reprints were dated as at the date of publication. If an authorised reprint is dated earlier than an unauthorised version published before 1 July 2002, it means the legislation was not further amended and the reprint date is the commencement of the last amendment.
    [Show full text]
  • Eminent Queensland Engineers
    EMI ENT QUEENSLAND ENGINEERS Volume II Editor Geoffrey Cossins Eminent Queensland Engineers Volume 11 Editor Geoffrey Cossins Cover picture: Doctor J.J.C. Bradfield Photograph by courtesy of Ipswich North state School. The picture was donated by Bradfield to The Institution of the school with the caption:.. UJ.J.C. Bradfield, C.M.G., D.Sc.Eng., D.E., M.E., Engineers, Australia M.Inst.C.E. M.lnst.E.A. Was taught his Alphabet and received the whole of his Queensland Division Prilu:try }l:dueation at the N'orth Ipswich state School 1872 - 1880." 1999 I EMINENT QUEENSLAND ENGINEERS 11 Institution of Engineers, Australia Queensland Division 447 Upper Edward st BRISBANE QLD 4000 Ph: 07 3832 3749 Fax: 07 3832 2101 E-Mail: [email protected] The Institution of Engineers, Australia is not responsible, as an organisation for the facts and opinions advanced in this pUblication. The copyright for each of the sections is retained by the respective authors. ISBN 085 825 717 3 National Library ofAustralia Catalogue No 620.0092 Printed by Monoset Printers Brendale QLD 4500 a1 1 EMINENT QUEENSLAND ENGINEERS 11 EMINENT QUEENSLAND ENGINEERS 11 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE INTRODUCTION 3 CONTRIBUTORS 6 BIOGRAPHIES 1. RBallard 10 2. Sir Charles Barton 12 3. GOBoultan 14 4. A Boyd 16 5. J J C Bradfield 18 6. H G Brameld 20 7. F H Brazier 22 8. F J Byerley 24 9. C M Calder 26 10. GFCardna 28 11. W J Doak 30 12. J W Dowrie 32 13. D Fison 34 14.
    [Show full text]
  • Freshwater Stocking in Queensland a Position Paper for Use in the Development of Future Ecologically Sustainable Management Practices
    Queensland the Smart State Freshwater stocking in Queensland A position paper for use in the development of future ecologically sustainable management practices Proof version 11 (revisions to printers proof v8) Today’s date 26/09/2007 Return proof by — Job name Freshwater stocking Queensland Date created 20/12/2006 Return proof to option 1 Kathryn Montafia File name Freshwater stocking QLD.indd Date due --/09/2007 Return proof to option 2 Role Name Signature Further proof required? Approved to print? Client Stephanie Challen Editor Danielle Jones/Melanie Phillips Job Designer Kathryn Montafia Number 2598 Acc Manager Katherine Boczynski If this proof is NOT returned by the date indicated above, this job will be delayed and the deadline will NOT be met. To avoid this please ensure all dates are adhered to. This printed sample is a proof only. Please read all copy for accuracy, omissions, deletions and corrections. DPI&F Publications have taken all measures to ensure the accuracy of this proof, however we can not be held responsible for any errors not brought to our attention. Colours appearing in this laser printed sample are not colour accurate. Colours in the final, commercially printed document will vary. Any changes made to this document after being signed off and approved for printing will incur additional production and printing costs and the final deadline will be compromised. Thank you. 210mm @ 100% Freshwater stocking in Queensland A position paper for use in the development of future ecologically sustainable management practices Aimee Moore, DPI&F, August 2007 PR07–2598 The Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries (DPI&F) seeks to maximise the economic potential of Queensland’s primary industries on a sustainable basis.
    [Show full text]