DOCSLIB.ORG

The Hostassociations of the Lice of Mammals

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

rhe Host-asociatioii\ of the lice of mainiiials . I35 (i. I! . J<'. HOPKLYS. MA.,O.K.E., F.R.E.S.. late. Senior 13 ntoniologist (Xedic al), Cgaiida Protectors te . [Keceived .liiiic. 7. I04h 1 (With 1 figlire 111 the. tcst.) Cumi*;sw. 1 . IXTIWDGI;T~OS............................................ (I) (4 oneral .......................................... (2) The classificat.ion of the lice of triammals ....... (3) What is a species .................... ....... (4j Thc extent. of our kiiowledye ....................... (3) AMetlliodsof' collecting lice frorn inammills .............. (ti) ,Methods of I)reservut.iw and vsarniria.tiori of liri: ...... (7) Aeknowledgnients ......................... 11. U1OLoc:Y OF L1O.E ......................................... (1) General ......................................... (2) Food ............................................ (:3 j Keaet.ions t.o trmperd lire ......................... (4)Ecologicel niches ................................. ( .7 ) Loiise-pop.ilat. ions of host-individuals ................ (ti) (:omposition of loiist?-~~op~~l~tio~i~..... (7) Effect on the host ................................ (8) Natural enemies ................................ (9) Symbiotic organisms ........................... I 10) Transfer from host to host. .......................... (1 I) Host-specificity ............. (1 2) Straggling and runt.amination ...................... ( 13) Primary and secondary infestittioris ................. (14) Secondary ahwncc .... ( 15) Geographical factors .............................. ILL A HOST-LISTOF THE LICE OF MAMMALS ...................... Procedure followed iri rompilirig t.ho iist ... ( I ) ihlonotremata .................................... (2) Marsupialia ...................................... (3) I&ectivora (4) Dermoptera ...................................... (3) Chiroptera .................. (11) Cetacea ... .................. (12) Carnivora ........................................ (13) Tubulidentata ................................. (14) Proboscidea ..... ............................. (18) Artiodactyla ...................................... IV . LICE AND THE PHYLOGENY OF THEIX HOK~S .................. V . DrscussioN ow THE HOST-LIST . (I) General ......................................... (2) Monotremata . (3) Marsupialia ... (4) hectivora ... (5) Dermoptera ... (6)Chiroptera .... (7) Primates ..... (8) Edentata ..... (9) Pholidota ........................................ 388 G. 11. E. HOPKINS (10) Lagomorpha ............. (1 1) Hodeiitia ................................ (12) C‘etaccs ................................ ( 13) Carnirorti ................................ (11) Ti<)Jllli&ntatii .................................... ( 16) l’roboscidea .......... ......................... (16) Hyracoidea, ....................................... (I i) Sirenia ........................................... (1s) PcrissodactyliL ............... (19) ArtiodactyL$ ...................................... \’I. THE .\P\’TIQUITY OF LICE AS PAlL4Y1TEY OD’ VER (1) IF-ious iittempts to iitilixe the evidence. ............. (2) bvidence from ~n~tmnmals.......................... (3) Evidence from hi& .............................. (4) Evidence from fossils ..... (5) The evidence as a whole .......................... ViI. SLJXMARY....................... ViIL LIYW~ATUREUONSGLTEU ................................... Ix. INDEX TO NAMES USED IN THE HOST-LIST ............. (I) GEL-1 IXESAL. oci;itioiis of licc with tdicir hosts iire of’cxtri~ordiii;~~.?.iiitcrest, hiit OIIC howletlgc oftlicm is rather. mvapc, 7‘hc l~reseiit~1)al~cr origiiiatccl i~s;iii attempt to tlecliice thc ;Lntiquity of t.lic licc 11s 1)arasiites of mammals, but so maiiy iiiterestiiig and coiit,roversial points cropped up that it seemed to me that’ it would be dishonest to give mere1.y extracts from the evidence (which might be sut)coiisciously selected to suit my beliefs) and that 1 must give the evidence in full. Hence the host list, for no sut,hor since 1880 appears to have attempted the task of compiling a complete host-list of the lice of mammals, though scvcral regional or 1)i~rtiallists haw been pi blished. These two sections makc up t,lie most im1)ortant part of the paper, hut 1have :dded sufficieiit 011 otlicr itspccts of the subject to make the whole com])rohcrisil)le,so 1 hc~pe,to those readers who have 1106 mactc a special stiicly of liw, ;~ndt,o indioibttesome ciircctioiis in which it seciiis to mc that furt)hcr ~~~eii~~.liwoiiltl bo I)artiurilarly fri~it~fiil. I have iiot hesitated to use cvitlencc tlrawii from bird-lice to cxcmplify poiiits in t’he biology or distribution of the lire of niitmriii~ls. It was riot until 1 had hgun the writing of this ~qert,liiLt 1 re;rlizecl how iiirmcrous tire the permissihk rneitiiiiigs of the word I‘ relatioiisliil) ”. In this pqm the word is consistently irscd in tlic soiisc of liiiisliip ; ot,her possibblc meaiiiiigs are expressed by tho word .‘ associatioils ”. (2) THE CLASYl~i~ATlONOF THE ],ICE OY MAMMALS. It, is germally a,ccept.ctL that lice are descended from Psoeitl-like aiicestors, and they have recently been placed as an order iii the superorder Ysoc:oidea, :L posit)ion which appears to express their relationships with tjhe other irisects rat,her better than ally other wliich has been suggested. They belong to t,he niorc primitive hemimetaboloiis group of iriseds, in which the iiewly-hatched insect resembles the adult in most reslieck They were formerly divided into two orders, Mallophaga or chewing lice * niitl Anopliira or sucking lice, but it h;ts ]low been recognized that the resemblances, between these tjwo groups arc of sucli importance that all the lice may be referred to one order (fig. 1). The liarno to be applied to taliisorder is in dispute. Leach (181-5) gave tl~ Iianic Rnoplura to t,liewhole groiq) tirid Nitzscli (1818,1). 280) named the ohewiiig licc Mallophagn ; the latter name, together with Rhyncophthirina (Ferris, 1931) * Neither of the usual English names for this group is appropriate : “ bird lice ” because many species occur on mammals, and “ biting lice ” because the sucking lice must also bite before they can suick. For this reason I have substituted the less familiar but more accurate term used here. HOST-ASSOUIATIOPr'S OF THN IJCN OW MAMMALS 3X!1 for the elephant-louse, has never been seriouslj- disputed, but tlic discov that tlic chewing and sucking groups of lice are closely related and shodd be reg:ardetl as suborders has created chaos as to the use of the iitmlc Xnoplrira, i\ few ntitliors using this name for tlie whole groiip (applying the name Sipliuli- ciilata to the sucking lice), while the great majority continue to use it for thc sucking lice alone, ab wa~universal until it few j+e;trs ago. Weber (193!j) included all the lice in the order Phthiraptera. of the superortlcr Psocoidea." Since ordinal iianics are apprently not governed by tlic lhiles of Sonicriclut,iire. we are free to adopt such names as will be most widely understood and ca~c tlie rnininnini of confusion and rnisL~il~~erstalldi1~~; I have tlicreforc continiicd the iisc of Arioplura for the sucking lice uiid liavc adopted Wctxr's iiarrie Phthiraptera for the whole order Figure 121. WBLYCERA ISCHNOCERA Rtii/NCOPtiTIiiRlPJT\ ANOPLURA PSOCOPTEROID STOCK M A tentative family-tree of the l'ht,hirapterii or lice. fl'/~,t;.Ilnllopltayu arc characterized by the possession of chewing or riiiiiicii- bnli~terriouth-~)arts, more or less similar to those of the Orthoptera. They are undoubtedly the more primitive of the two suborders of the Phthiraptera, adarc theniselves divided into three very distinct superfamilies-the Bmblycem, lschnocera and Rhyncophthirina. The two former groups differ in a number of respects, but principally in the fact that maxillary palpi are present in the Amblycera but absent in the Ischnocera. For this and other reasons it is generally accepted that the Amblycera are more primitive than the Ischnocera, and the resemblances of the former to the Psocoptera are such as to leave little room for doubt that the original Mallophaga were amblycerous.? The * The suggestion that lice are related to the Psocidae seems to have been first put, forward by Packard (1887, pp. 267, 271). Kellogg (1896, pp. 468-471 ; 1902) came to the same conclusion. t Bedford (1932cc, p. 309) differs from t,he majority of authors in considering the Ischnocera to be the more primitive group, citing as evidence the presence in the Amblyceru of a special groove to protect the antenna, and the possession by certain genera of patches of setae or combs of spines on the venter of the legs and abdomen. While agreeing tbat these are specialized characters, I do not think Bedford right in his main contention, because I consider that the primitive characters of the Amblycera (particularly the presence of maxillary palpi) are more important than their specializations. But this example illustrates well the combination of primitive and specialized characters in the same group (and often in the same insect) which is so common among the Phthiraptera and which constitutes one of the greatest stumblingblocks in the way of attempts to devise a natural classification of the lice. 3 FK) (:. H. ..E. HOf'Kl xs 1.ihyi~col)ht'hirinaare a very curious groiip with on1~-oiie known rctpresentati\,t., flaeinutot/c!jzr/se1~phat~ti.s Piitget. which seems to form 1-0 sonie extent a link I)etween tlie Jlallophaga and the Aiioplura : it has clwritig mouth-parts, I)iit they are reduced iii size, iiiucli specialized,
Recommended publications

  • PLAGUE STUDIES * 6. Hosts of the Infection R

    Bull. Org. mond. Sante 1 Bull. World Hlth Org. 1952, 6, 381-465 PLAGUE STUDIES * 6. Hosts of the Infection R. POLLITZER, M.D. Division of Epidemiology, World Health Organization Manuscript received in April 1952 RODENTS AND LAGOMORPHA Reviewing in 1928 the then rather limited knowledge available concerning the occurrence and importance of plague in rodents other than the common rats and mice, Jorge 129 felt justified in drawing a clear-cut distinction between the pandemic type of plague introduced into human settlements and houses all over the world by the " domestic " rats and mice, and " peste selvatique ", which is dangerous for man only when he invades the remote endemic foci populated by wild rodents. Although Jorge's concept was accepted, some discussion arose regarding the appropriateness of the term " peste selvatique" or, as Stallybrass 282 and Wu Lien-teh 318 translated it, " selvatic plague ". It was pointed out by Meyer 194 that, on etymological grounds, the name " sylvatic plague " would be preferable, and this term was widely used until POzzO 238 and Hoekenga 105 doubted, and Girard 82 denied, its adequacy on the grounds that the word " sylvatic" implied that the rodents concerned lived in forests, whereas that was rarely the case. Girard therefore advocated the reversion to the expression "wild-rodent plague" which was used before the publication of Jorge's study-a proposal it has seemed advisable to accept for the present studies. Much more important than the difficulty of adopting an adequate nomenclature is that of distinguishing between rat and wild-rodent plague- a distinction which is no longer as clear-cut as Jorge was entitled to assume.
  • Animals in the Zika Virus Life Cycle: What to Expect from Megadiverse Latin American

    Animals in the Zika Virus Life Cycle: What to Expect from Megadiverse Latin American

    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/062034; this version posted July 8, 2016. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC 4.0 International license. Animals in the Zika virus life cycle: what to expect from megadiverse Latin American countries. Marina Galvão Bueno1*; Nádia Martinez1; Lívia Abdala1, Claudia Nunes Duarte dos Santos2; Marcia Chame1& 1. Fundação Oswaldo Cruz – Programa Institucional Biodiversidade e Saúde, Av. Brasil 4036, sala 214, Rio de Janeiro - RJ - 21.040-361, Brazil. 2. Laboratório de Virologia Molecular, Instituto Carlos Chagas, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rua Prof. Algacyr Munhoz Mader 3775, Curitiba – PR - 81350-010, Brazil. *Corresponding author Email: [email protected] (MGB) &Second Corresponding author Email: [email protected] (MC) bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/062034; this version posted July 8, 2016. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC 4.0 International license. ABSTRACT Zika virus (ZIKV) was first isolated in 1947 in primates in Uganda, West Africa. The virus remained confined to the equatorial regions of Africa and Asia, cycling between infecting monkeys, arboreal mosquitoes, and occasional humans. The ZIKV Asiatic strain was probably introduced into Brazil in 2013. In the current critical human epidemic in the Americas, ZIKV is transmitted primarily by Aedes aegypti mosquitoes, especially where the human population density is combined with poor sanitation.
  • Special Publications Museum of Texas Tech University Number 63 18 September 2014

    Special Publications Museum of Texas Tech University Number 63 18 September 2014

    Special Publications Museum of Texas Tech University Number 63 18 September 2014 List of Recent Land Mammals of Mexico, 2014 José Ramírez-Pulido, Noé González-Ruiz, Alfred L. Gardner, and Joaquín Arroyo-Cabrales.0 Front cover: Image of the cover of Nova Plantarvm, Animalivm et Mineralivm Mexicanorvm Historia, by Francisci Hernández et al. (1651), which included the first list of the mammals found in Mexico. Cover image courtesy of the John Carter Brown Library at Brown University. SPECIAL PUBLICATIONS Museum of Texas Tech University Number 63 List of Recent Land Mammals of Mexico, 2014 JOSÉ RAMÍREZ-PULIDO, NOÉ GONZÁLEZ-RUIZ, ALFRED L. GARDNER, AND JOAQUÍN ARROYO-CABRALES Layout and Design: Lisa Bradley Cover Design: Image courtesy of the John Carter Brown Library at Brown University Production Editor: Lisa Bradley Copyright 2014, Museum of Texas Tech University This publication is available free of charge in PDF format from the website of the Natural Sciences Research Laboratory, Museum of Texas Tech University (nsrl.ttu.edu). The authors and the Museum of Texas Tech University hereby grant permission to interested parties to download or print this publication for personal or educational (not for profit) use. Re-publication of any part of this paper in other works is not permitted without prior written permission of the Museum of Texas Tech University. This book was set in Times New Roman and printed on acid-free paper that meets the guidelines for per- manence and durability of the Committee on Production Guidelines for Book Longevity of the Council on Library Resources. Printed: 18 September 2014 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Special Publications of the Museum of Texas Tech University, Number 63 Series Editor: Robert J.
  • Species List

    Species List

    Mozambique: Species List Birds Specie Seen Location Common Quail Harlequin Quail Blue Quail Helmeted Guineafowl Crested Guineafowl Fulvous Whistling-Duck White-faced Whistling-Duck White-backed Duck Egyptian Goose Spur-winged Goose Comb Duck African Pygmy-Goose Cape Teal African Black Duck Yellow-billed Duck Cape Shoveler Red-billed Duck Northern Pintail Hottentot Teal Southern Pochard Small Buttonquail Black-rumped Buttonquail Scaly-throated Honeyguide Greater Honeyguide Lesser Honeyguide Pallid Honeyguide Green-backed Honeyguide Wahlberg's Honeyguide Rufous-necked Wryneck Bennett's Woodpecker Reichenow's Woodpecker Golden-tailed Woodpecker Green-backed Woodpecker Cardinal Woodpecker Stierling's Woodpecker Bearded Woodpecker Olive Woodpecker White-eared Barbet Whyte's Barbet Green Barbet Green Tinkerbird Yellow-rumped Tinkerbird Yellow-fronted Tinkerbird Red-fronted Tinkerbird Pied Barbet Black-collared Barbet Brown-breasted Barbet Crested Barbet Red-billed Hornbill Southern Yellow-billed Hornbill Crowned Hornbill African Grey Hornbill Pale-billed Hornbill Trumpeter Hornbill Silvery-cheeked Hornbill Southern Ground-Hornbill Eurasian Hoopoe African Hoopoe Green Woodhoopoe Violet Woodhoopoe Common Scimitar-bill Narina Trogon Bar-tailed Trogon European Roller Lilac-breasted Roller Racket-tailed Roller Rufous-crowned Roller Broad-billed Roller Half-collared Kingfisher Malachite Kingfisher African Pygmy-Kingfisher Grey-headed Kingfisher Woodland Kingfisher Mangrove Kingfisher Brown-hooded Kingfisher Striped Kingfisher Giant Kingfisher Pied
  • Wild Mammals of the Annapurna Conservation Area Cggk"0F{ ;+/If0f If]Qsf :Tgwf/L Jgohgt' Wild Mammals of the Annapurna Conservation Area - 2019

    Wild Mammals of the Annapurna Conservation Area Cggk"0F{ ;+/If0f If]Qsf :Tgwf/L Jgohgt' Wild Mammals of the Annapurna Conservation Area - 2019

    Wild Mammals of the Annapurna Conservation Area cGgk"0f{ ;+/If0f If]qsf :tgwf/L jGohGt' Wild Mammals of the Annapurna Conservation Area - 2019 ISBN 978-9937-8522-8-9978-9937-8522-8-9 9 789937 852289 National Trust for Nature Conservation Annapurna Conservation Area Project Khumaltar, Lalitpur, Nepal Hariyo Kharka, Pokhara, Kaski, Nepal National Trust for Nature Conservation P.O. Box: 3712, Kathmandu, Nepal P.O. Box: 183, Kaski, Nepal Tel: +977-1-5526571, 5526573, Fax: +977-1-5526570 Tel: +977-61-431102, 430802, Fax: +977-61-431203 Annapurna Conservation Area Project Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Website: www.ntnc.org.np Website: www.ntnc.org.np 2019 Wild Mammals of the Annapurna Conservation Area cGgk"0f{ ;+/If0f If]qsf :tgwf/L jGohGt' National Trust for Nature Conservation Annapurna Conservation Area Project 2019 Wild Mammals of the Annapurna Conservation Area cGgk"0f{ ;+/If0f If]qsf :tgwf/L jGohGt' Published by © NTNC-ACAP, 2019 All rights reserved Any reproduction in full or in part must mention the title and credit NTNC-ACAP. Reviewers Prof. Karan Bahadur Shah (Himalayan Nature), Dr. Naresh Subedi (NTNC, Khumaltar), Dr. Will Duckworth (IUCN) and Yadav Ghimirey (Friends of Nature, Nepal). Compilers Rishi Baral, Ashok Subedi and Shailendra Kumar Yadav Suggested Citation Baral R., Subedi A. & Yadav S.K. (Compilers), 2019. Wild Mammals of the Annapurna Conservation Area. National Trust for Nature Conservation, Annapurna Conservation Area Project, Pokhara, Nepal. First Edition : 700 Copies ISBN : 978-9937-8522-8-9 Front Cover : Yellow-bellied Weasel (Mustela kathiah), back cover: Orange- bellied Himalayan Squirrel (Dremomys lokriah).
  • Mammals of Jordan

    Mammals of Jordan

    © Biologiezentrum Linz/Austria; download unter www.biologiezentrum.at Mammals of Jordan Z. AMR, M. ABU BAKER & L. RIFAI Abstract: A total of 78 species of mammals belonging to seven orders (Insectivora, Chiroptera, Carni- vora, Hyracoidea, Artiodactyla, Lagomorpha and Rodentia) have been recorded from Jordan. Bats and rodents represent the highest diversity of recorded species. Notes on systematics and ecology for the re- corded species were given. Key words: Mammals, Jordan, ecology, systematics, zoogeography, arid environment. Introduction In this account we list the surviving mammals of Jordan, including some reintro- The mammalian diversity of Jordan is duced species. remarkable considering its location at the meeting point of three different faunal ele- Table 1: Summary to the mammalian taxa occurring ments; the African, Oriental and Palaearc- in Jordan tic. This diversity is a combination of these Order No. of Families No. of Species elements in addition to the occurrence of Insectivora 2 5 few endemic forms. Jordan's location result- Chiroptera 8 24 ed in a huge faunal diversity compared to Carnivora 5 16 the surrounding countries. It shelters a huge Hyracoidea >1 1 assembly of mammals of different zoogeo- Artiodactyla 2 5 graphical affinities. Most remarkably, Jordan Lagomorpha 1 1 represents biogeographic boundaries for the Rodentia 7 26 extreme distribution limit of several African Total 26 78 (e.g. Procavia capensis and Rousettus aegypti- acus) and Palaearctic mammals (e. g. Eri- Order Insectivora naceus concolor, Sciurus anomalus, Apodemus Order Insectivora contains the most mystacinus, Lutra lutra and Meles meles). primitive placental mammals. A pointed snout and a small brain case characterises Our knowledge on the diversity and members of this order.
  • Biogeography and Taxonomy of Apodemus Sylvaticus (The Woodmouse) in the Tyrrhenian Region: Enzymatic Variations and Mitochondrial DNA Restriction Pattern Analysis J

    Biogeography and Taxonomy of Apodemus Sylvaticus (The Woodmouse) in the Tyrrhenian Region: Enzymatic Variations and Mitochondrial DNA Restriction Pattern Analysis J

    Heredity 76(1996) 267—277 Received30 May 1995 Biogeography and taxonomy of Apodemus sylvaticus (the woodmouse) in the Tyrrhenian region: enzymatic variations and mitochondrial DNA restriction pattern analysis J. ft MICHAUX, M.-G. FILIPPUCCtt, ft M. LIBOIS, ft FONS & ft F. MATAGNE Service d'Ethologie et de Psycho/ogle An/male, Institut de Zoologie, Quai Van Beneden 22 4020 Liege, Belgium, ¶Dipartimento di Biologia, Universita di Roma 'Tor Vergata Via 0. Raimondo, Rome 00173, Italy, Centre d'Ecologie Terrestre, Laboratoire ARAGO, Université Paris VI, 66650, Banyu/s/Mer, France and §Laboratoire de Génetique des Microorganismes, Institut de Botanique (Bat. B 22), Université de Liege, Sart Ti/man, 4000 Liege, Belgium Inthe western Mediterranean area, the taxonomic status of the various forms of Apodemus sylvaticus is quite unclear. Moreover, though anthropogenic, the origins of the island popula- tions remain unknown in geographical terms. In order to examine the level of genetic related- ness of insular and continental woodmice, 258 animals were caught in 24 localities distributed in Belgium, France, mainland Italy, Sardinia, Corsica and Elba. Electrophoresis of 33 allo- zymes and mtDNA restriction fragments were performed and a UPGMA dendrogram built from the indices of genetic divergence. The dendrogram based on restriction patterns shows two main groups: 'Tyrrhenian', comprising all the Italian and Corsican animals and 'North- western', corresponding to all the other mice trapped from the Pyrenees to Belgium. Since all the Tyrrhenian mice are similar and well isolated from their relatives living on the western edge of the Alpine chain, they must share a common origin. The insular populations are consequently derived from peninsular Italian ones.
  • Quaternary Murid Rodents of Timor Part I: New Material of Coryphomys Buehleri Schaub, 1937, and Description of a Second Species of the Genus

    Quaternary Murid Rodents of Timor Part I: New Material of Coryphomys Buehleri Schaub, 1937, and Description of a Second Species of the Genus

    QUATERNARY MURID RODENTS OF TIMOR PART I: NEW MATERIAL OF CORYPHOMYS BUEHLERI SCHAUB, 1937, AND DESCRIPTION OF A SECOND SPECIES OF THE GENUS K. P. APLIN Australian National Wildlife Collection, CSIRO Division of Sustainable Ecosystems, Canberra and Division of Vertebrate Zoology (Mammalogy) American Museum of Natural History ([email protected]) K. M. HELGEN Department of Vertebrate Zoology National Museum of Natural History Smithsonian Institution, Washington and Division of Vertebrate Zoology (Mammalogy) American Museum of Natural History ([email protected]) BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY Number 341, 80 pp., 21 figures, 4 tables Issued July 21, 2010 Copyright E American Museum of Natural History 2010 ISSN 0003-0090 CONTENTS Abstract.......................................................... 3 Introduction . ...................................................... 3 The environmental context ........................................... 5 Materialsandmethods.............................................. 7 Systematics....................................................... 11 Coryphomys Schaub, 1937 ........................................... 11 Coryphomys buehleri Schaub, 1937 . ................................... 12 Extended description of Coryphomys buehleri............................ 12 Coryphomys musseri, sp.nov.......................................... 25 Description.................................................... 26 Coryphomys, sp.indet.............................................. 34 Discussion . ....................................................
  • Habitat-Specific Shaping of Proliferation and Neuronal Differentiation in Adult Hippocampal Neurogenesis of Wild Rodents

    Habitat-Specific Shaping of Proliferation and Neuronal Differentiation in Adult Hippocampal Neurogenesis of Wild Rodents

    Zurich Open Repository and Archive University of Zurich Main Library Strickhofstrasse 39 CH-8057 Zurich www.zora.uzh.ch Year: 2013 Habitat-specific shaping of proliferation and neuronal differentiation in adult hippocampal neurogenesis of wild rodents Cavegn, Nicole ; van Dijk, R Maarten ; Menges, Dominik ; Brettschneider, Helene ; Phalanndwa, Mashudu ; Chimimba, Christian T ; Isler, Karin ; Lipp, Hans-Peter ; Slomianka, Lutz ; Amrein, Irmgard DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2013.00059 Posted at the Zurich Open Repository and Archive, University of Zurich ZORA URL: https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-89370 Journal Article Published Version The following work is licensed under a Creative Commons: Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC BY 3.0) License. Originally published at: Cavegn, Nicole; van Dijk, R Maarten; Menges, Dominik; Brettschneider, Helene; Phalanndwa, Mashudu; Chimimba, Christian T; Isler, Karin; Lipp, Hans-Peter; Slomianka, Lutz; Amrein, Irmgard (2013). Habitat-specific shaping of proliferation and neuronal differentiation in adult hippocampal neurogenesis of wild rodents. Frontiers in Neuroscience:7:59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2013.00059 ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE published: 18 April 2013 doi: 10.3389/fnins.2013.00059 Habitat-specific shaping of proliferation and neuronal differentiation in adult hippocampal neurogenesis of wild rodents Nicole Cavegn 1, R. Maarten van Dijk 1, Dominik Menges 1, Helene Brettschneider 2,3, Mashudu Phalanndwa 2,4, Christian T. Chimimba2,5 , Karin Isler6 , Hans-Peter Lipp 1 , Lutz Slomianka1 and Irmgard
  • Hastings Slide Collection3

    Hastings Slide Collection3

    HASTINGS NATURAL HISTORY RESERVATION SLIDE COLLECTION 1 ORDER FAMILY GENUS SPECIES SUBSPECIES AUTHOR DATE # SLIDES COMMENTS/CORRECTIONS Siphonaptera Ceratophyllidae Diamanus montanus Baker 1895 221 currently Oropsylla (Diamanus) montana Siphonaptera Ceratophyllidae Diamanus spp. 1 currently Oropsylla (Diamanus) spp. Siphonaptera Ceratophyllidae Foxella ignota acuta Stewart 1940 402 syn. of F. ignota franciscana (Roths.) Siphonaptera Ceratophyllidae Foxella ignota (Baker) 1895 2 Siphonaptera Ceratophyllidae Foxella spp. 15 Siphonaptera Ceratophyllidae Malaraeus spp. 1 Siphonaptera Ceratophyllidae Malaraeus telchinum Rothschild 1905 491 M. telchinus Siphonaptera Ceratophyllidae Monopsyllus fornacis Jordan 1937 57 currently Eumolpianus fornacis Siphonaptera Ceratophyllidae Monopsyllus wagneri (Baker) 1904 131 currently Aetheca wagneri Siphonaptera Ceratophyllidae Monopsyllus wagneri ophidius Jordan 1929 2 syn. of Aetheca wagneri Siphonaptera Ceratophyllidae Opisodasys nesiotus Augustson 1941 2 Siphonaptera Ceratophyllidae Orchopeas sexdentatus (Baker) 1904 134 Siphonaptera Ceratophyllidae Orchopeas sexdentatus nevadensis (Jordan) 1929 15 syn. of Orchopeas agilis (Baker) Siphonaptera Ceratophyllidae Orchopeas spp. 8 Siphonaptera Ceratophyllidae Orchopeas latens (Jordan) 1925 2 Siphonaptera Ceratophyllidae Orchopeas leucopus (Baker) 1904 2 Siphonaptera Ctenophthalmidae Anomiopsyllus falsicalifornicus C. Fox 1919 3 Siphonaptera Ctenophthalmidae Anomiopsyllus congruens Stewart 1940 96 incl. 38 Paratypes; syn. of A. falsicalifornicus Siphonaptera
  • Environmental Assessment Report

    Environmental Assessment Report

    2 Greenwood and Kealy Woods Park Urban Forest Environmental Assessment Report July 20, 2020 Submitted to: City of North Vancouver 141 West 14th Street North Vancouver V7M 1H9 Greenwood and Kealy Woods Park Environmental Assessment Report Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................4 2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS ............................................................................................................5 2.1 Topography .................................................................................................................................................. 5 2.2 Biogeoclimatic Classification ........................................................................................................................ 7 2.3 Forest Stands ................................................................................................................................................ 8 2.4 Understory Vegetation ............................................................................................................................... 12 2.5 Invasive plant species ................................................................................................................................. 13 2.6 Watercourses ............................................................................................................................................. 15 2.7 Wildlife ......................................................................................................................................................
  • Bush Meat Trade in Makurdi Metropolis; Implications for the Conservation of Wildlife in Nigeria

    Bush Meat Trade in Makurdi Metropolis; Implications for the Conservation of Wildlife in Nigeria

    Tee et al. J. Appl. Biosci. 2012 Bush meat trade in Makurdi; implications for conservation of wildlife in Nigeria Journal of Applied Biosciences 52: 3704 – 3715 ISSN 1997–5902 Bush meat trade in Makurdi Metropolis; implications for the conservation of wildlife in Nigeria Tee 1 T.N. *, Ikpa 2 T.F and Tortange 1 V. 1Department of Social and Environmental Forestry, University of Agriculture, P.M.B 2373 Makurdi, Nigeria. 2Department of wildlife and Range Management, University of Agriculture Makurdi, Nigeria *Corresponding author e-mail: [email protected] , Phone +2348053448726, +2348094948262. Originally Submitted on 30 th January 2012. Published online at www.m.elewa.org on April 30, 2012. ABSTRACT Objective: To examine how bush meat trading processes could be adapted as a conduit for tackling the threatening disappearance of wildlife resources from their habitat in Nigeria. Methodology and results: Bush meat trade species in Makurdi metropolis were identified, and their sources and channels of trade and profitability determined through participatory market survey techniques. Applying a multistage sampling technique, 179 bush meat traders were identified and their trading activities monitored between February and August, 2010. Data were analysed on Excel and SPSS 14.0 software version. Fourteen bush meat species obtained from protected areas in Bauchi, Cross-River and Taraba states; over 300km away from the metropolis, were identified and 6074 dry bush meat carcasses were traded over the study period. The bush meat trade, channelling from primary suppliers through middlemen to the ultimate consumers was profitable. Conclusions and application of findings: Bush meat is widely consumed in Makurdi metropolis, and the numerous bush meat carcasses traded depicts the existent exploitation pressure on wildlife; and threat to their sustainability.