DOCSLIB.ORG

Scienti®C Review Post Traumatic Stress Disorder and Spinal Cord Injuries

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Scienti®C Review Post Traumatic Stress Disorder and Spinal Cord Injuries Spinal Cord (2001) 39, 1±10 ã 2001 International Medical Society of Paraplegia All rights reserved 1362 ± 4393/01 $15.00 www.nature.com/sc Scienti®c Review Post traumatic stress disorder and spinal cord injuries Paul Kennedy*,1 and Jane Du1 1National Spinal Injuries Centre, Stoke Mandeville Hospital NHS Trust, Aylesbury, Bucks HP21 8AL, UK Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) was ®rst recognised by psychiatric international classi®cation systems in 1980 and a wealth of research and treatment literature has developed since. This paper provides a review of PTSD and Spinal Cord Injuries. A brief history of the disorder is provided before descriptions of the de®ning characteristics, assessment and dierential diagnoses. The paper provides an overview of the incidence and prevalence of PTSD and risk factors within the general population, before considering both veteran and non-veteran research within spinal cord injuries. Pharmacological and psychological approaches to the treatment of PTSD are also discussed. The review closes with recommendations for future research into the prevalence and treatment of PTSD in spinal cord injuries. Spinal Cord (2001) 39, 1±10 Keywords: PTSD; SCI; psychology; review Introduction The syndrome of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder examined combat exposure in World War II. Kleber et (PTSD) as it is currently known was ®rst described in al4 reported that by 1991 over 500 papers had been the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental published on the psychological eects of the US war in Disorders by the American Psychiatric Association in Vietnam. The psychological eects of natural disasters 1980. Whilst this disorder is one of the newest entries have also been examined, from James'5 observations to psychiatric nosology, it was ®rst described as of the San Francisco earthquake, the Ecuadorian traumatic neurosis by Seguin1 who advocated the earthquakes of 19876 and Hurricane Andrew.7 De term to replace Railway Brain and Railway Spine Silva8 reviews traumatic reactions to other disasters, (both of which came from the considerable number of including violence, accidents, concentration camp railway accidents) and compensation neurosis. Freud experiences and torture. and Breuer2 developed the conceptualisation further, Whilst the nomenclature is new, there exist early which dominated thinking during World War I. Greek and Egyptian descriptions of the impact of war Dissatisfaction with the Freudian focus on early and many Shakespearean plays refer to acute stress developmental experience renewed interest in the reactions. However, it is Samuel Pepy's diary entries condition which went through a variety of terms that around the time of the Great Fire of London in 1666 included shellshock, gross stress reaction and combat that provide what Daly9 describes as an excellent neurosis. Research into the psychological eects of the record of the development of post traumatic stress wars, natural disasters and violence of the 20th century disorder. contributed to the recognition of the syndrome as post- traumatic stress disorder in 1980. Following exposure The diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder to a traumatic event of exceptional severity which involves actual or threatened harm and is associated Post-traumatic stress disorder is classi®ed as an anxiety with fear, helplessness or horror, some people develop disorder and is recognised by international psychiatric symptoms of intrusive re-experiencing of the trauma, nosological systems. As mentioned, it was ®rst avoidant behaviours and symptoms of increased recognised in the third edition of the Diagnostic and physiological arousal. Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-III).10 Traumatic responses to the major incidents of the Yule et al11 report that following further research, the last century have been extensively studied. Swank3 criteria whereby the disorder was de®ned was revised in DSM-III-R12 and again in DSM-IV.13 The most recent World Health Organisation's Classi®cation of Mental 14 *Correspondence: P Kennedy and Behavioural Disorders (ICD-10) recognised two Post traumatic stress disorder PKennedyandJDuff 2 reactions to acute stress; one which was transient and ogy.19 Harvey and Bryant20 concluded that a full was reported as an acute reaction to stress, and the diagnosis of ASD is highly predictive for the other which was considered an adjustment reaction development of chronic PTSD. In ASD, dissociative which lasted longer. Yule et al11 report that whilst the symptoms (such as numbing, depersonalisation and ICD-1014 criteria for PTSD are similar to those of amnesia) are essential diagnostic criteria, but in PTSD DSM-IV,13 both involve identi®cation of a threatening they are not. Adjustment disorders are a state of event which is thought necessary in the onset of the subjective distress and emotional disturbance, usually disorder. interfering with social functioning and performance However, there are some subtle dierences between and occur in response to a signi®cant life change (such the diagnostic approach of the two systems. ICD as a spinal cord injury). They usually last for 1 month provides an overall approach, whereas DSM provides and symptoms rarely exceed 6 months. Persons with a more mechanistic set of guidelines. ICD prefers that chronic PTSD are more likely than those with acute only one diagnosis be given to the patient, whereas PTSD to have co-morbid psychiatric disorders rather DSM encourages the making of multiple diagnosis and than other medical conditions. acknowledges the degree of co-morbidity. The biggest single dierence lies in the emphasis placed on emotional numbing. ICD sees this as a frequent Comorbidity accompaniment to PTSD, but not being necessary, People who experience PTSD symptoms often meet the whereas DSM regards this as one of the criterion criteria for at least one other psychiatric diagnosis. characteristics. The two ocial de®nitions are Brady21 reported that 80% of individuals with PTSD provided in Tables 1 and 2 respectively. met the criteria for at least one other psychiatric Davidson and Foa15 reported that until recently it diagnosis, with the most common being depression.22,23 was not unusual to encounter some skepticism as to Simon24 suggested that other co-morbid associations, the validity of the condition. Some claimed that PTSD including dissociative disorder, anxiety, panic disorder, was mainly a form of malingering or the expression of drug abuse/dependence and neuroticism, have been another psychopathological disorder. They report that found to be associated with vulnerability to chronic since its introduction in 1980, it has become the PTSD. subject of extensive literature carrying risks of chronicity, morbidity, mortality and increased physi- cal and psychiatric disturbances. The body of Assessment information about the subject has grown rapidly.16 Yule et al11 argue that there is no substitute for an in- Yehuda and McFarlane17 report that in the last depth clinical interview when obtaining information decade of the 20th century the biological concomi- both for the purposes of making a diagnosis and tants of PTSD have provided objective validation that planning treatment. This clinical interview should be it is more than a political or social conceptualisation carried out by a well-trained mental health profes- of human suering. In their extensive review of the sional. In addition to diagnostic interviews, there are a psychobiology of PTSD, they and their co-writers number of semi-structured interviews that assess PTSD document the neuroendocrinology, psychophysiology, symptoms. Watson25 reviews the psychometric mea- neurochemistry and neuroanatomy of traumatic stress surement techniques of PTSD. The Clinician Adminis- reactions. tered PTSD Scale26 is reported by Yule et al11 to be the most useful. The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM (SCID) developed by Spitzer et al27 is also Dierential diagnosis frequently used. Other measures that were speci®cally Jones and Barlow18 conclude that PTSD is clearly developed to identify the main features of PTSD dierentiated from other anxieties (with a possible include the Impact of Event Scale developed by exception of some simple phobias) as the anxiety is Horowitz et al.28 This scale identi®es the two main centred around cues associated with the original features of PTSD, ie intrusion and avoidance and is the trauma and these cues serve as the triggers for measure used by the authors in assessing PTSD alarms. There is also more dissociation present in symptoms with a spinal cord injured population. It is severe cases of PTSD than anxiety disorders. Acute the single most widely used instrument for assessing the Stress Reaction (ASR) is an ICD 10 diagnosis, has a psychological consequences of traumatic events.29 similar etiology to PTSD but is dierentiated on the Keane29 recommends the following ®ve steps when basis of temporal resolution, as the minimum duration assessing PTSD. The ®rst involves the conduct of a for ASR is at least 2 days, but nor more than 1 week. standard comprehensive detailed clinical examination DSM-IV13 also recognised and introduced the that also includes information on the traumatic event diagnosis of Acute Stress Disorder (ASD). Although which should be assessed in detail. The second relates similar to PTSD in relation to the symptoms of re- to the use of the structured clinical interview and experiencing, avoidance and arousal, two dierences explores the possible ICD/DSM diagnoses that may be distinguish it from PTSD: the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Spinal Cord Injury and Traumatic Brain Injury Research Grant Program Report 2020
    This document is made available electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library as part of an ongoing digital archiving project. http://www.leg.state.mn.us/lrl/lrl.asp Spinal Cord Injury and Traumatic Brain Injury Research Grant Program Report January 15, 2020 Author About the Minnesota Office of Higher Education Alaina DeSalvo The Minnesota Office of Higher Education is a Competitive Grants Administrator cabinet-level state agency providing students with Tel: 651-259-3988 financial aid programs and information to help [email protected] them gain access to postsecondary education. The agency also serves as the state’s clearinghouse for data, research and analysis on postsecondary enrollment, financial aid, finance and trends. The Minnesota State Grant Program is the largest financial aid program administered by the Office of Higher Education, awarding up to $207 million in need-based grants to Minnesota residents attending eligible colleges, universities and career schools in Minnesota. The agency oversees other state scholarship programs, tuition reciprocity programs, a student loan program, Minnesota’s 529 College Savings Plan, licensing and early college awareness programs for youth. Minnesota Office of Higher Education 1450 Energy Park Drive, Suite 350 Saint Paul, MN 55108-5227 Tel: 651.642.0567 or 800.657.3866 TTY Relay: 800.627.3529 Fax: 651.642.0675 Email: [email protected] Table of Contents Introduction 1 Spinal Cord Injury and Traumatic Brain Injury Advisory Council 1 FY 2020 Proposal Solicitation Schedule
    [Show full text]
  • Chronic Pain and Biopsychosocial Disorders
    VOLUME 5, ISSUE 7 NOVEMBER/DECEMBER 2005 The journal with the practitioner in mind. ChronicChronic PPainain andand BiopsychosocialBiopsychosocial DisordersDisorders ©2005 PPM Communications, Inc. Reprinted with permission. www.ppmjournal.com . The BHI™2 Approach to Classification and Assessment By Daniel Bruns, PsyD and John Mark Disorbio, EdD ccounting for over 35 million of- pain. In other cases however, the psycho- While chronic pain is generally recog- fice visits a year, pain represents logical difficulties may be the conse- nized as being a biopsychosocial phe- A the most prevalent reason why an quence of the pain condition, itself.12 nomenon, what is often overlooked is that individual chooses to seek out medical Thus, when pain appears in conjunction illness, injury, psychological and social treatment.1 So prevalent, in fact, research with stress, anxiety, depression or other factors interact over the course of time to has shown that the cost associated with the psychiatric syndromes, the arrow of produce distinctly different types of treatment of pain exceeds the costs at- causality can sometimes point from pain biopsychosocial disorders. Effective treat- tributable to the treatment of other dis- to psychiatric condition, and in other ment requires that the clinician not only orders, such as heart disease, respiratory cases from psychiatric condition to pain. identify the biological, psychological and disease, or cancer.2 Pain also represents a Overall, the research literature suggests social aspects of a condition, but also
    [Show full text]
  • In This Issue
    July 2020 NEWS Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Assessment and Treatment In this Issue: Guidelines for Pediatric Primary Upcoming Clinical Care Conversations 5 Clinical Conversation: May 26, 2020 Presented by Sylvia Krinsky, MD, Tufts Medical Center For some children, childhood is far from a carefree time; they Leadership: experience trauma which can disrupt development and lead John Straus, MD to post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). At the May Clinical Founding Director Conversation, Sylvia Krinsky, MD, MCPAP site director at Tufts Barry Sarvet, MD Medical Center, discussed how to address PTSD in the primary Medical Director care setting. Beth McGinn Types of trauma Program Manager There are three major types of trauma: Elaine Gottlieb • Discrete Trauma – examples include a car accident, injury, Contributing Writer medical procedure, or a single episode of physical or sexual assault, when life is filled with otherwise helpful and supportive people • Complex Trauma – series of repeated traumas usually in close interpersonal contexts, such as childhood abuse or neglect, witnessing domestic or community violence, or racism and chronic social adversities • Adverse Childhood Event – a term from the Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) study, referring to potentially traumatic events that can have an impact on physical and psychological health Discrete trauma is most recognized in the DSM-5, while ACE is more familiar to the medical community, says Dr. Krinsky. 1000 Washington St., Suite 310 One study reported in the Journal of the American Medical Boston, MA 02118 Association (JAMA) found that more than 90 percent of pediatric Email: [email protected] patients seen in a primary care pediatric clinic had experienced a traumatic exposure, and 25 percent met full or partial criteria for www.mcpap.org PTSD.
    [Show full text]
  • T5 Spinal Cord Injuries
    Spinal Cord (2020) 58:1249–1254 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41393-020-0506-7 ARTICLE Predictors of respiratory complications in patients with C5–T5 spinal cord injuries 1 2,3 3,4 1,5 1,5 Júlia Sampol ● Miguel Ángel González-Viejo ● Alba Gómez ● Sergi Martí ● Mercedes Pallero ● 1,4,5 3,4 1,4,5 1,4,5 Esther Rodríguez ● Patricia Launois ● Gabriel Sampol ● Jaume Ferrer Received: 19 December 2019 / Revised: 12 June 2020 / Accepted: 12 June 2020 / Published online: 24 June 2020 © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to International Spinal Cord Society 2020 Abstract Study design Retrospective chart audit. Objectives Describing the respiratory complications and their predictive factors in patients with acute traumatic spinal cord injuries at C5–T5 level during the initial hospitalization. Setting Hospital Vall d’Hebron, Barcelona. Methods Data from patients admitted in a reference unit with acute traumatic injuries involving levels C5–T5. Respiratory complications were defined as: acute respiratory failure, respiratory infection, atelectasis, non-hemothorax pleural effusion, 1234567890();,: 1234567890();,: pulmonary embolism or haemoptysis. Candidate predictors of these complications were demographic data, comorbidity, smoking, history of respiratory disease, the spinal cord injury characteristics (level and ASIA Impairment Scale) and thoracic trauma. A logistic regression model was created to determine associations between potential predictors and respiratory complications. Results We studied 174 patients with an age of 47.9 (19.7) years, mostly men (87%), with low comorbidity. Coexistent thoracic trauma was found in 24 (19%) patients with cervical and 35 (75%) with thoracic injuries (p < 0.001). Respiratory complications were frequent (53%) and were associated to longer hospital stay: 83.1 (61.3) and 45.3 (28.1) days in patients with and without respiratory complications (p < 0.001).
    [Show full text]
  • Psychogenic Pseudoepileptic Seizures – from Ancient Time to the Present
    11 Psychogenic Pseudoepileptic Seizures – From Ancient Time to the Present Joanna Jędrzejczak1,* and Krzysztof Owczarek2 1Department of Neurology and Epileptology Medical Centre for Postgraduate Education, Warsaw 2Department of Medical Psychology Medical University, Warsaw Poland 1. Introduction Clinicians who work with patients with epilepsy are confronted with many diagnostic and therapeutic challenges when have to differentiate between epileptic and psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES). At the end of the twentieth century, the introduction of electroencephalography (EEG) recording with simultaneous monitoring of patient behaviour helped to correct false positive and false negative diagnoses of the nature of convulsive conditions. This technological advancement sensitized physicians to the high incidence of patients with PNES receiving referrals to clinical centres specializing in the treatment of epilepsy. When PNES is erroneously diagnosed as epilepsy, patients are at risk of prolonged, unnecessary, and above all, ineffective treatment with antiepileptic drugs. These drugs do not reduce the number of psychogenic convulsive incidents. Moreover , ineffective treatment leads to frequent visits to outpatient clinics and hospitalizations. It also leads to frequent change of doctors, strategies and forms of treatments. All this increases the cost of erroneous diagnosis and inadequate treatment. PNES are defined as “episodes of altered movement, sensation or experience similar to epilepsy, but casued by a psychological process and not associated with abnormal electrical discharges un the brain” (Reuber and Elger, 2003) In current diagnostic schemes PNES are categorized as a manifestation of dissociative or somatoform (conversion) disorder (ICD-10). This mean that they are caused by unconscious, symbolically expressed psychological processes leading to conversion, i.e. the pressing need to interpret one’s problems in ways which are both rationally and socially acceptable.
    [Show full text]
  • Acute Stress Disorder
    Trauma and Stress-Related Disorders: Developments for ICD-11 Andreas Maercker, MD PhD Professor of Psychopathology, University of Zurich and materials prepared and provided by Geoffrey Reed, PhD, WHO Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse Connuing Medical Educaon Commercial Disclosure Requirement • I, Andreas Maercker, have the following commercial relaonships to disclose: – Aardorf Private Psychiatric Hospital, Switzerland, advisory board – Springer, book royales Members of the Working Group • Christopher Brewin (UK) Organizational representatives • Richard Bryant (AU) • Mark van Ommeren (WHO) • Marylene Cloitre (US) • Augusto E. Llosa (Médecins Sans Frontières) • Asma Humayun (PA) • Renato Olivero Souza (ICRC) • Lynne Myfanwy Jones (UK/KE) • Inka Weissbecker (Intern. Medical Corps) • Ashraf Kagee (ZA) • Andreas Maercker (chair) (CH) • Cecile Rousseau (CA) WHO scientists and consultant • Dayanandan Somasundaram (LK) • Geoffrey Reed • Yuriko Suzuki (JP) • Mark van Ommeren • Simon Wessely (UK) • Michael B. First WHO Constuencies 1. Member Countries – Required to report health stascs to WHO according to ICD – ICD categories used as basis for eligibility and payment of health care, social, and disability benefits and services 2. Health Workers – Mulple mental health professions – ICD must be useful for front-line providers of care in idenfying and treang mental disorders 3. Service Users – ‘Nothing about us without us!’ – Must provide opportunies for substanve, early, and connuing input ICD Revision Orienting Principles 1. Highest goal is to help WHO member countries reduce disease burden of mental and behavioural disorders: relevance of ICD to public health 2. Focus on clinical utility: facilitate identification and treatment by global front-line health workers 3. Must be undertaken in collaboration with stakeholders: countries, health professionals, service users/consumers and families 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Neurologic Deterioration Secondary to Unrecognized Spinal Instability Following Trauma–A Multicenter Study
    SPINE Volume 31, Number 4, pp 451–458 ©2006, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc. Neurologic Deterioration Secondary to Unrecognized Spinal Instability Following Trauma–A Multicenter Study Allan D. Levi, MD, PhD,* R. John Hurlbert, MD, PhD,† Paul Anderson, MD,‡ Michael Fehlings, MD, PhD,§ Raj Rampersaud, MD,§ Eric M. Massicotte, MD,§ John C. France, MD,࿣ Jean Charles Le Huec, MD, PhD,¶ Rune Hedlund, MD,** and Paul Arnold, MD†† Study Design. A retrospective study was undertaken their neurologic injury. The most common reason for the that evaluated the medical records and imaging studies of missed injury was insufficient imaging studies (58.3%), a subset of patients with spinal injury from large level I while only 33.3% were a result of misread radiographs or trauma centers. 8.3% poor quality radiographs. The incidence of missed Objective. To characterize patients with spinal injuries injuries resulting in neurologic injury in patients with who had neurologic deterioration due to unrecognized spine fractures or strains was 0.21%, and the incidence as instability. a percentage of all trauma patients evaluated was 0.025%. Summary of Background Data. Controversy exists re- Conclusions. This multicenter study establishes that garding the most appropriate imaging studies required to missed spinal injuries resulting in a neurologic deficit “clear” the spine in patients suspected of having a spinal continue to occur in major trauma centers despite the column injury. Although most bony and/or ligamentous presence of experienced personnel and sophisticated im- spine injuries are detected early, an occasional patient aging techniques. Older age, high impact accidents, and has an occult injury, which is not detected, and a poten- patients with insufficient imaging are at highest risk.
    [Show full text]
  • Mental Health Diagnosis Codes
    Mental Health Diagnosis Codes Code Description Code System 10007009 Coffin-Siris syndrome (disorder) SNOMEDCT 10278007 Factitious purpura (disorder) SNOMEDCT 10327003 Cocaine-induced mood disorder (disorder) SNOMEDCT 10349009 Multi-infarct dementia with delirium (disorder) SNOMEDCT 10532003 Primary degenerative dementia of the Alzheimer type, presenile onset, with SNOMEDCT depression (disorder) 10586006 Occupation-related stress disorder (disorder) SNOMEDCT 106013002 Mental disorder of infancy, childhood or adolescence (disorder) SNOMEDCT 106014008 Organic mental disorder of unknown etiology (disorder) SNOMEDCT 106015009 Mental disorder AND/OR culture bound syndrome (disorder) SNOMEDCT 109006 Anxiety disorder of childhood OR adolescence (disorder) SNOMEDCT 109478007 Kohlschutter's syndrome (disorder) SNOMEDCT 109805003 Factitious cheilitis (disorder) SNOMEDCT 109896009 Indication for modification of patient status (disorder) SNOMEDCT 109897000 Indication for modification of patient behavior status (disorder) SNOMEDCT 109898005 Indication for modification of patient cognitive status (disorder) SNOMEDCT 109899002 Indication for modification of patient emotional status (disorder) SNOMEDCT 109900007 Indication for modification of patient physical status (disorder) SNOMEDCT 109901006 Indication for modification of patient psychological status (disorder) SNOMEDCT 11061003 Psychoactive substance use disorder (disorder) SNOMEDCT 111475002 Neurosis (disorder) SNOMEDCT 111476001 Mental disorder usually first evident in infancy, childhood AND/OR
    [Show full text]
  • Update on Critical Care for Acute Spinal Cord Injury in the Setting of Polytrauma
    NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS Neurosurg Focus 43 (5):E19, 2017 Update on critical care for acute spinal cord injury in the setting of polytrauma *John K. Yue, BA,1,2 Ethan A. Winkler, MD, PhD,1,2 Jonathan W. Rick, BS,1,2 Hansen Deng, BA,1,2 Carlene P. Partow, BS,1,2 Pavan S. Upadhyayula, BA,3 Harjus S. Birk, MD,3 Andrew K. Chan, MD,1,2 and Sanjay S. Dhall, MD1,2 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco; 2Brain and Spinal Injury Center, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco; and 3Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Diego, California Traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) often occurs in patients with concurrent traumatic injuries in other body systems. These patients with polytrauma pose unique challenges to clinicians. The current review evaluates existing guidelines and updates the evidence for prehospital transport, immobilization, initial resuscitation, critical care, hemodynamic stabil- ity, diagnostic imaging, surgical techniques, and timing appropriate for the patient with SCI who has multisystem trauma. Initial management should be systematic, with focus on spinal immobilization, timely transport, and optimizing perfusion to the spinal cord. There is general evidence for the maintenance of mean arterial pressure of > 85 mm Hg during imme- diate and acute care to optimize neurological outcome; however, the selection of vasopressor type and duration should be judicious, with considerations for level of injury and risks of increased cardiogenic complications in the elderly. Level II recommendations exist for early decompression, and additional time points of neurological assessment within the first 24 hours and during acute care are warranted to determine the temporality of benefits attributable to early surgery.
    [Show full text]
  • Posttraumatic Stress Following Spinal Cord Injury: a Systematic Review of Risk and Vulnerability Factors
    Spinal Cord (2017) 55, 800–811 & 2017 International Spinal Cord Society All rights reserved 1362-4393/17 www.nature.com/sc REVIEW Posttraumatic stress following spinal cord injury: a systematic review of risk and vulnerability factors K Pollock1,3, D Dorstyn1,3, L Butt2 and S Prentice1 Objectives: To summarise quantitatively the available evidence relating to pretraumatic, peritraumatic and posttraumatic characteristics that may increase or decrease the risk of developing posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) following spinal cord injury (SCI). Study design: Systematic review. Methods: Seventeen studies were identified from the PubMed, PsycInfo, Embase, Scopus, CINAHL, Web of Science and PILOTS databases. Effect size estimates (r) with associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs), P-values and fail-safe Ns were calculated. Results: Individual studies reported medium-to-large associations between factors that occurred before (psychiatric history r = 0.48 (95% CI, 0.23–0.79) P = 0.01) or at the time of injury (tetraplegia r = − 0.36 (95% CI, − 0.50 to − 0.19) Po0.01). Postinjury factors had the strongest pooled effects: depressed mood (rw = 0.64, (95% CI, 0.54–0.72)), negative appraisals (rw = 0.63 (95% CI, 0.52– 0.72)), distress (rw = 0.57 (95% CI, 0.50–0.62)), anxiety (rw = 0.56 (95% CI, 0.49–0.61)) and pain severity (rw = 0.35 (95% CI, 0.27– 0.43)) were consistently related to worsening PTSD symptoms (Po0.01). Level of injury significantly correlated with current PTSD severity for veteran populations (QB (1) = 18.25, Po0.001), although this was based on limited data.
    [Show full text]
  • Amc Trauma Practice Management Guidelines: Traumatic Brian Injury
    AMC TRAUMA PRACTICE MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES: TRAUMATIC BRIAN INJURY Original 10/2018 Revised 1/2020 AMC TRAUMA PRACTICE MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES: TRAUMATIC BRIAN INJURY Purpose: Neurotrauma care must be continuously available for all TRAUMATIC BRIAN INJURY (TBI) and Spinal Cord Injury patients. SUPPORTIVE DATA Policy Statements: Neurosurgical providers must respond and be present for consultation and management decisions for patients with TBI or spinal cord injury within 30 minutes of consultation by the Trauma Service based on institution specific criteria. Neurosurgery Attending will arrive within 30 minutes for decreasing GCS with midline shift requiring operative decompression. Institution Specific Criteria and Definitions: TBI Initial Encounter Codes S06.1 Traumatic Cerebral Edema S06.2 Diffuse Traumatic Brain Injury S06.3 Focal Traumatic Brain Injury S06.4 Epidural Hemorrhage S06.5 Traumatic Subdural Hemorrhage S06.6 Traumatic Subarachnoid Hemorrhage S06.8 Other Specified Intracranial Injuries S06.9 Unspecified Intracranial Injury Spinal Cord Injury Cervical Initial Encounter Codes S14.0xxa Concussion and Edema of Cervical Spinal Cord, Initial Encounter S14.1 Other and Unspecified Injuries of Cervical Spinal Cord Spinal Cord Injury Thoracic Initial Encounter Codes S24.0xxa Concussion and Edema of Thoracic Spinal Cord, Initial Encounter S24.1 Other and Unspecified Injuries of Thoracic Spinal Cord Lumbar & Sacral Initial Encounter Codes S34.0 Concussion and Edema of Lumbar and Sacral Spinal Cord S34.1 Other and Unspecified Injury of Lumbar and Sacral Spinal Cord S34.3xxa Injury of Cauda Equina, Initial Encounter Background: The following clinical practice guidelines for management of traumatic brain injury were abstracted directly from the Brain Trauma Foundation’s Guidelines for the Management of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury 4th Edition.
    [Show full text]
  • The Relationship Between Dispositional Empathy, Psychological Distress, and Posttraumatic Stress Responses Among Japanese Unifor
    Nagamine et al. BMC Psychiatry (2018) 18:328 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-018-1915-4 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access The relationship between dispositional empathy, psychological distress, and posttraumatic stress responses among Japanese uniformed disaster workers: a cross-sectional study Masanori Nagamine1* , Jun Shigemura2, Toshimichi Fujiwara3, Fumiko Waki3, Masaaki Tanichi2, Taku Saito2, Hiroyuki Toda2, Aihide Yoshino2 and Kunio Shimizu1 Abstract Background: Disaster workers suffer from psychological distress not only through the direct experience of traumatic situations but also through the indirect process of aiding disaster victims. This distress, called secondary traumatic stress, is linked to dispositional empathy, which is the tendency for individuals to imagine and experience the feelings and experiences of others. However, the association between secondary traumatic stress and dispositional empathy remains understudied. Methods: To examine the relationship between dispositional empathy and mental health among disaster workers, we collected data from 227 Japan Ground Self-Defense Force personnel who engaged in international disaster relief activities in the Philippines following Typhoon Yolanda in 2013. The Impact of Event Scale-Revised and the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale were used to evaluate posttraumatic stress responses (PTSR) and general psychological distress (GPD), respectively. Dispositional empathy was evaluated through the Interpersonal Reactivity Index, which consists of four subscales: Perspective Taking, Fantasy, Empathic Concern, and Personal Distress. Hierarchial linear regression analyses were performed to identify the variables related to PTSR and GPD. Results: High PTSR was significantly associated with high Fantasy (identification tendency, β =0.21,p < .01), high Personal Distress (the self-oriented emotional disposition of empathy, β =0.18,p <.05),andnoexperienceofdisaster relief activities (β =0.15,p < .05).
    [Show full text]