Eriogaster Catax

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Eriogaster catax http://www.iucnredlist.org/details/8029/0 Login | FAQ | Contact | Terms of use | IUCN.org The IUCN Red List View detailed species information Export data for analysis View summary statistics Learn more about The IUCN Red List Continue to The IUCN Red List 2013.2 Discover The IUCN Red List Try the new search tool Explore species View images Create your own lists and more... Discover more Remember my selection About Red List Overview Citation Contact Publications and Links Summary Statistics Initiatives Amphibians Mammals Europe Mediterranean Freshwater News Current Archives Photos 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 1 / 4 2014.01.20. 11:02 Eriogaster catax http://www.iucnredlist.org/details/8029/0 2006 2004 2003 2002 2000 Partners Partners and Technical Support Contributors Sponsors Resources Key Documents Categories and Criteria Classification Schemes Data Organization Spatial Data Download Information Sources and Quality Assessment Process Red List Training References Acknowledgements SIS News and Updates Discover more Home > Eriogaster catax 2 / 4 2014.01.20. 11:02 Eriogaster catax http://www.iucnredlist.org/details/8029/0 Eriogaster catax Summary Classification Schemes Images & External Links Bibliography Full Account Taxonomy Assessment Information Geographic Range Habitat and Ecology View Printer Friendly Taxonomy [top] Kingdom Phylum Class Order Family ANIMALIAARTHROPODAINSECTALEPIDOPTERALASIOCAMPIDAE Scientific Name: Eriogaster catax Species Authority: (Linnaeus, 1758) Assessment Information [top] 3 / 4 2014.01.20. 11:02 Eriogaster catax http://www.iucnredlist.org/details/8029/0 Red List Category & Criteria: Data Deficient ver 2.3 Year Published: 1996 Date Assessed: 1996-08-01 Annotations: Needs updating Assessor/s: World Conservation Monitoring Centre 1994 – Endangered (Groombridge 1994) 1990 – Endangered (IUCN 1990) History: 1988 – Endangered (IUCN Conservation Monitoring Centre 1988) 1986 – Endangered (IUCN Conservation Monitoring Centre 1986) Geographic Range [top] Native: Countries: Austria; Belgium; Bulgaria; Czech Republic; Germany; Hungary; Italy; Montenegro; Netherlands; Serbia (Serbia); Slovakia; Spain Range Click here to open the map viewer and explore range. Map: Habitat and Ecology [top] Systems: Terrestrial World Conservation Monitoring Centre 1996. Eriogaster catax . In: IUCN 2013. IUCN Red Citation: List of Threatened Species. Version 2013.2. < www.iucnredlist.org >. Downloaded on 20 January 2014 . Disclaimer: To make use of this information, please check the < Terms of Use >. If you see any errors or have any questions or suggestions on what is shown on this page, Feedback: please fill in the feedback form so that we can correct or extend the information provided Home | Contact | FAQ | Feedback | Site Map | Donate Now ISSN 2307-8235 Privacy & Security | Terms of Use © International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources. 4 / 4 2014.01.20. 11:02.

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Elpenor 2010-2015
Projet ELPENOR MACROHETEROCERES DU CANTON DE GENEVE : POINTAGE DES ESPECES PRESENTES Résultats des prospections 2010-2015 Pierre BAUMGART & Maxime PASTORE « Voilà donc les macrohétérocéristes ! Je les imaginais introvertis, le teint blafard, disséquant, cataloguant, épinglant. Ils sont là, enjoués, passionnés, émerveillés par les trésors enfouis des nuits genevoises ! » Blaise Hofman, « La clé des champs » SOMMAIRE • ELPENOR ? 2 • INTRODUCTION 3 • PROTOCOLE DE CHASSE 4 • FICHE D’OBSERVATIONS 4 • MATÉRIEL DE TERRAIN 5 • SITES PROSPECTÉS 7 - 11 • ESPÈCES OBSERVÉES 2010 – 2015 13 (+ 18 p. hors-texte) • ESPECES OBSERVEES CHAQUE ANNEE 13’ • ECHANTILLONNAGE D’ESPECES 14 • CHRONOLOGIE DES OBSERVATIONS REMARQUABLES 15 – 17 • ESPECES A RECHERCHER 18-20 • AUTRES VISITEURS… 21 • PUBLICATIONS 22 (+ 4 p. hors-texte) • ESPECES AJOUTEES A LA LISTE 23 • RARETÉS 24 • DISCUSSION 25 - 26 • PERSPECTIVES 27 • CHOIX DE CROQUIS DE TERRAIN 29 - 31 • COUPURES DE PRESSE 33 - 35 • ALBUM DE FAMILLE 36 • REMERCIEMENTS 37 • BIBLIOGRAPHIE & RESSOURCES INTERNET 38 – 39 1 ELPENOR ? Marin et compagnon d'Ulysse à son retour de la guerre de Troie, Elpenor (en grec Ἐλπήνορος , « homme de l'espoir ») est de ceux qui, sur l'île d'Aenea, furent victimes de la magicienne Circé et transformés en pourceaux jusqu'à ce qu'Ulysse, qui avait été préservé des enchantements de la magicienne grâce à une herbe offerte par le dieu Hermès, la contraigne à redonner à ses compagnons leur forme humaine. Lors de la fête qui s’ensuivit, Elpenor, pris de boisson, s'endormit sur la terrasse de la demeure de Circé, et, réveillé en sursaut, se tua en tombant du toit. Lorsqu'il descendit aux Enfers pour consulter le devin Tirésias, Ulysse croisa l’ombre de son défunt compagnon, à laquelle il promit une sépulture honorable.
[Show full text]
Monitoring Methodology and Protocols for 20 Habitats, 20 Species and 20 Birds
1 Finnish Environment Institute SYKE, Finland Monitoring methodology and protocols for 20 habitats, 20 species and 20 birds Twinning Project MK 13 IPA EN 02 17 Strengthening the capacities for effective implementation of the acquis in the field of nature protection Report D 3.1. - 1. 7.11.2019 Funded by the European Union The Ministry of Environment and Physical Planning, Department of Nature, Republic of North Macedonia Metsähallitus (Parks and Wildlife Finland), Finland The State Service for Protected Areas (SSPA), Lithuania 2 This project is funded by the European Union This document has been produced with the financial support of the European Union. Its contents are the sole responsibility of the Twinning Project MK 13 IPA EN 02 17 and and do not necessarily reflect the views of the European Union 3 Table of Contents 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................................................... 6 Summary 6 Overview 8 Establishment of Natura 2000 network and the process of site selection .............................................................. 9 Preparation of reference lists for the species and habitats ..................................................................................... 9 Needs for data .......................................................................................................................................................... 9 Protocols for the monitoring of birds ....................................................................................................................
[Show full text]
Eriogaster Catax (Lepidoptera: Lasiocampidae) – First Record in Muntenia (Southern Romania)
Travaux du Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle “Grigore Antipa” 62 (1): 81–86 (2019) doi: 10.3897/travaux.62.e38484 FAUNISTIC NOTE Eriogaster catax (Lepidoptera: Lasiocampidae) – first record in Muntenia (southern Romania) Maximilian Teodorescu1, Mihai Stănescu2 1 15 Fizicienilor, L2 Block, Apartment 7, 077125 Măgurele, Romania 2 “Grigore Antipa” National Museum of Natural History, 1 Kiseleff Blvd, 011341 Bucharest, Romania Corresponding author: Mihai Stănescu ([email protected]) Received 19 February 2019 | Accepted 13 May 2019 | Published 31 July 2019 Citation: Teodorescu M, Stănescu M (2019) Eriogaster catax (Lepidoptera: Lasiocampidae) – first record in Muntenia (southern Romania). Travaux du Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle “Grigore Antipa” 62(1): 81–86. https://doi.org/10.3897/travaux.62.e38484 Abstract Eriogaster catax is a highly threatened species listed on the Annexes II and IV of the Habitats Direc- tive and on the Annex II of the Bern Convention. In Romania, up till now, it was reported only from Banat, Crișana, Satu Mare county, Transylvania and southern Dobruja. A male attracted by a light trap installed near Olteni, Dâmbovița county, in mid-October 2018, has scored the first record of this species in Muntenia. Afterwards, larvae have been found in the same place, confirming the first, adult- based finding. Keywords threatened species, faunistic note, first record, distribution. The Eastern eggar,Eriogaster catax (Linnaeus, 1758), is a moth of the family La- siocampidae Harris, 1841, largely distributed in the western Palaearctic region. In Europe, its range stretches from northern Spain, France, Belgium and the Nether- lands to Ukraine and southern Russia to the Ural Mountains.
[Show full text]
Lepidoptera: Lasiocampidae)
STUDIA UNIVERSITATIS BABEf-BOLYAI BIOLOGIA, 64, 2, 2019 (p. 67-82) doi:10.24193/subbbiol.2019.2.06 Ultrastructural aspects of Eriogaster catax and Eriogaster lanestris (Lepidoptera: Lasiocampidae) Cristian Sitar1 and Alexandra Ciorîì£1, 2 1Babeè-Bolyai University, Faculty of Biology and Geology, 5-7 Clinicilor, 400006, Cluj-Napoca, Romania; 2National Institute for Research and Development of Isotopic and Molecular Technologies, 67-103 Donat, 400293 Cluj-Napoca, Romania; Corresponding author, E-mail: [email protected]. Abstract. Eriogaster catax (Linnaeus, 1758) and E. lanestris (Linnaeus, 1758) are two related species in the family Lasiocampidae with decreasing distribution areas and extremely isolated populations, thus being vulnerable to numerous threats, particularly human impact. Until presently, the biological and ecological studies regarding the species in question are scarce, particularly for E. catax, a species protected through Annexes II and IV of the Council Directive 92/43/EEC, Annex II of the Bern Convention and Law no. 49/2011 in Romania. Taking into account the importance of the E. catax species and the insufficient information reported on the ecological need of the species, a highly detailed analysis at an ultrastructural level could provide valuable information. The primitive aspect of the wings explained the weak distribution of adults. The different flight period of adults and egg laying season were reflected on the structure, adherence and size of eggs. Also, the structure of the fibers was correlated with the different ways in which E. catax and E. lanestris use the nest. Keywords: Eriogaster catax, E. lanestris, oviposition strategy, ecological niche. Introduction Eriogaster catax (Linnaeus, 1758) and E.
[Show full text]
Eriogaster Catax (L., 1758) 1074 La Laineuse Du Prunellier Insectes, Lépidoptères, Lasiocampides
Insectes - Lépidoptères Eriogaster catax (L., 1758) 1074 La Laineuse du prunellier Insectes, Lépidoptères, Lasiocampides Description de l’espèce Envergure de l’aile antérieure : 15 à 17 mm. Papillon mâle Ailes antérieures : elles sont fauve orangé avec un gros point discal blanc sur les deux tiers proximaux et violet-marron clair sur le tiers marginal. On observe deux bandes transversales plus jaunes de part et d’autre du point blanc discal. Le dessous des ailes est plus foncé. Ailes postérieures : elles sont entre le violet très pâle et le marron clair. Antennes : elles sont bipectinées, de couleur fauve. Corps : il est fauve orangé. Chenilles : l’éclosion a lieu au printemps. Sur Prunellier, elle coïncide avec l’apparition des jeunes feuilles. Les chenilles peu- vent être observées entre avril et juillet en fonction des condi- Papillon femelle tions climatiques locales et de la latitude. La coloration des ailes est plus claire. Les femelles sont plus Chrysalides : au cours du mois de juillet, les chenilles descendent grandes avec des antennes fines. L’extrémité de l’abdomen est au niveau du sol pour se nymphoser. Lorsque les conditions cli- munie d’une pilosité importante gris noirâtre (bourre abdominale). matiques sont défavorables, les adultes n’émergent pas et la chrysalide hiverne. Œuf Adultes : les adultes s’observent de septembre à octobre. Ils sont aplatis, de couleur gris brunâtre. Activité Chenille Adultes : ils sont nocturnes et difficilement observables car la Elle est couverte de longues soies gris brunâtre. Le corps est période d’attraction par les pièges lumineux est très courte. noir, couvert d’une courte pilosité brun jaune, avec des taches Comportement de ponte des femelles : les œufs sont déposés dorsales noir-bleu et des taches latérales bleues ponctuées et groupés dans un manchon annulaire recouvert d’une couche de striées de jaune.
[Show full text]
Temporal Partitioning in an Assemblage of Insect Defoliators Feeding on Oak on a Mediterranean Mountain
Eur. J. Entomol. 109: 55–69, 2012 http://www.eje.cz/scripts/viewabstract.php?abstract=1680 ISSN 1210-5759 (print), 1802-8829 (online) Temporal partitioning in an assemblage of insect defoliators feeding on oak on a Mediterranean mountain MARIA KALAPANIDA1 and PANOS V. PETRAKIS2* 1 National Agricultural Research Foundation, Forest Research Inst., 57006 Vassilika, Thessaloniki, Greece 2 National Agricultural Research Foundation, Institute for Mediterranean Forest Ecosystem Research, Laboratory of Entomology, Terma Alkmanos, 11528 Ilissia, Athens, Greece Key words. Quercus, Lepidoptera, Coleoptera, Hymenoptera, oak defoliators, phenology, species coexistence, niche overlap, zoogeographical categories, feeding specialization, Mt Holomontas Chalkidiki Greece Abstract. Insects feeding on the foliage of oak were studied on a mountain where species of Mediterranean deciduous and evergreen oak coexist. There were 58 insect species (54 Lepidoptera, 1 Coleopteran and 3 Hymenoptera) belonging to twenty families in the assemblage feeding on eight species of Quercus, two of which are introduced from nearby regions. The overlap in occurrence in time and of feeding niches of the insects feeding on the foliage of the different species of oak was determined using the: (a) Poole- Rathcke method, which tests phenological overlap and (b) Petraitis method, which tests niche overlap. This indicated that insect families partition seasonal time in a random and the entire assemblage in a regular way. All groups of insects partitioned season ran- domly except for the pairs of monophagous-oligophagous and Palearctic-Eurosiberian species, which partition season regularly. Oak folivorous insects correctly perceive the three subgenera of oaks with the exception of the planted Q. robur pedunculiflora. The folivorous insects recorded on the Mediterranean evergreen oaks (subgenus Sclerophyllodrys) differ from those on the other two sub- genera (Quercus and Cerris) and co-occurring deciduous trees.
[Show full text]
Towards an Ecological Network for the Carpathians
Towards an Ecological Network for the Carpathians This publication is the result of the BBI/Matra programme entitled “Development of an Ecological Network for the Carpathians”, which was implemented between April 2006 and April 2009 and funded by the BBI Matra program of the Dutch government. Towards an Ecological Network for the Carpathians Preface The purpose of the project was to support the imple- mentation of the ‘Convention on the Protection and Sustainable Development of the Carpathians’ (herein- after Carpathian Convention) that entered into force in January 2006 after ratification by four contracting par- ties. The development of an ecological network in the Carpathians, as a constituent part of the Pan-European Authors: Ecological Network, is one of the important objectives of the Convention. Chapter 2: Carpathian Biodiversity Information System Jan Seffer and Rastislav Lasak (Daphne, Institute of Applied Ecology) The ecological network designed, serves as an important Chapter 3: Ecological Network Design tool for governments and the Interim Secretariat of the Mike Baltzer (WWF-DCPO), Irene Bouwma (Alterra), Lawrence Jones Carpathian Convention for the planning of sustainable Walters (ECNC on Ken and SPEN outcomes) and Bob Smith (Durrell development. Institute of Conservation and Ecology) Chapter 4: Recommendations The project was carried out under the overall responsi- Mike Baltzer (WWF-DCPO), Karina Kitnaes (Orbicon) bility of Wageningen International (part of Wageningen and Henk Zingstra (Wageningen International) University) and in cooperation with the Carpathian Chapter 5: Status and Recommendations per target country Ecoregion Initiative (CERI), which was responsible for the Karina Kitnaes (Orbicon) and Henk Zingstra (Wageningen project implementation in the three target countries.
[Show full text]
Distribution of Some European Lepidoptera
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of Belgrade - Faculty of Biology: Open Journal Systems Acta entomologica serbica, 2019, 24(2): 11-41 UDC: 595.783(4) 595.783-169(4) DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3529669 DISTRIBUTION OF SOME EUROPEAN LEPIDOPTERA BASED ON THE FINDINGS OF THEIR NON-ADULT STAGES PRESENTED THROUGH TROPHIC ASSOCIATIONS AND A QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS OF THEIR PARASITOIDS VLADIMIR ŽIKIĆ1*, RUDOLF RITT2, MARCO COLACCI3, BOŽENKA HRIC4, SAŠA S. STANKOVIĆ1, MARIJANA ILIĆ MILOŠEVIĆ1, MAJA LAZAREVIĆ1, KATARINA KOS5, DAWID MARCZAK6, YERAY MONASTERIO LEÓN7, MIHAILO VUJIĆ8, ROMAN MAGLIĆ9 and JOSEF DE FREINA10 1 Faculty of Sciences and Mathematics, Department of Biology and Ecology, University of Niš, Višegradska 33, 18000 Niš, Serbia E-mail: [email protected] (corresponding author) 2 Sonneneck 7, 94051 Hauzenberg, Germany 3 Department of Agriculture, Environmental and Food Sciences, University of Molise, Via de Sanctis, 86100 Campobasso, Italy 4 Jovana Popovića 72, 22300 Stara Pazova, Serbia 5 Biotechnical Faculty, Department of Agronomy, University of Ljubljana, Jamnikarjeva 101, 1111 Ljubljana, Slovenia 6 Faculty of Engineering and Management, University of Ecology and Management in Warsaw, 12 Olszewska Street, 00-792 Warsaw, Poland 7 Asociación Española para la Protección de las Mariposas y su Medio (Zerynthia) Madre de Dios, 14-7D. 26004 Logroño, La Rioja, Spain 8 Bulevar Revolucije 33, 11224 Vrčin, Serbia 9 Krležina 31, 52100 Pula, Croatia 10 Museum Witt, Tengstraße 33, 81541 Munchen, Germany Abstract We examined 638 Lepidoptera specimens on the territories of 13 European countries in our search for parasitoids. We collected eggs, larvae and pupae.
[Show full text]
Bourovec Trnkový (Eriogaster Catax)
Plán managementu druhu Bourovec trnkový (Eriogaster catax) Zpracovali: RNDr. Jan Uřičář Prof. RNDr. Zdeněk Laštůvka, CSc. Přepracoval: RNDr. Jan Uřičář, listopad 2013 Obsah 1 Úvod ........................................................................................................................... 3 2 Bourovec trnkový - Eriogaster catax (Linnaeus, 1758) ................................................... 3 2.1 Biologie................................................................................................................. 3 2.1.1 Hostitelská rostlina .......................................................................................... 3 2.1.2 Způsob života a populační ekologie ................................................................... 3 2.2 Rozšíření............................................................................................................... 4 2.3 Stanovištní nároky ................................................................................................. 5 3 Výskyt druhu v Bílých Karpatech na základě mapování..................................................... 5 3.1 Historie pozorování ................................................................................................ 5 3.2 Výsledky mapování ................................................................................................ 5 3.3 Podrobná tabulka výskytu ....................................................................................... 6 4 Zhodnocení stávajícího managementu a jeho vliv na populaci..........................................
[Show full text]
Nincs Diacím
based on the presentation: Nyugat-magyarországi Egyetem Öko-club 2010. május 6. Sopron, TheThe casecase ofof OrangeOrange EggarEggar (Eriogaster(Eriogaster catax)catax) withwith thethe agri-environmentalagri-environmental schemesschemes inin HungaryHungary Dr. Ambrus András Fertő-Hanság Nemzeti Park Igazgatóság EriogasterEriogaster cataxcatax inin thethe NationalNational ReportReport followingfollowing thethe Art.17Art.17 ofof thethe EUEU HabitatsHabitats DirectiveDirective inin 2009 2009 Eriogaster catax was regarded by the experts as a typical species of Oak forest margins (including Turkey oak, mixed hardwood galleries and steppe forests) especially along the natural and semi-natural Prunus and Crataegus fringe. The intensive management of forests caused a serious decrease of fringes, bushes, so the habitat loss caused the thinning out of the species over large areas and in West-Europe it got close to extinction. Up to the 80-ies, 90ies in Hungary it was regarded as a rare species occurring only in warm places of the Pannonian hilly country and the Southern slopes of the NE mountains. More recently it turned out to be much more frequent, especially in shrubberies, abandoned pastures with old trees, which are important for the late larval instars (it was regarded that the final instars change foodplant to Oak trees). The demographical changes can be sharp, mainly because of the parasitoids attacking the late instar caterpillars which leave the nests and continue feeding solitarily. Good years (e.g. 2005) of the Eriogaster catax are
[Show full text]
Action Plan for the Conservation of the Danube Clouded Yellow Colias Myrmidone in the European Union
Action Plan for the Conservation of the Danube Clouded Yellow Colias myrmidone in the European Union final draft (13/4/2012) EUROPEAN COMMISSION, 2012 THE N2K GROUP European Economic Interest Group Compilers: Pavel Marhoul (Daphne/N2K Group, Czech Republic), Matthias Dolek (Büro Geyer und Dolek, Germany) List of contributors Jiří Beneš, Institute of Entomology, Biology Centre, ASCR, v.v.i., České Budějovice, Czech Republic Stoyan Beshkov, National Museum of Natural History, Sofia, Bulgaria Karel Chobot, Agency for Nature Conservation and Landscape Protection, Czech Republic Andrei Crisan, Romania Sylvain Cuvelier, Belgium Ionut Iorgu, “Grigore Antipa” National Museum of Natural History, Romania Matjaž Jež, Institute of the Republic of Slovenia for Nature Conservation, RU Maribor, Slovenia Henrik Kalivoda, Institute of Landscape Ecology, Slovakia Martin Konvička, Institute of Entomology, Biology Centre, ASCR, v.v.i., České Budějovice, Czech Republic Ábrahám Levente, Somogy County Museums, Hungary Attila Mesterházy, University of West Hungary, Hungary Szabolcs Sáfián, Hungarian Natural Heritage Trust, Hungary Martina Šašić, Croatian Natural History Museum, Croatia, Butterfly Conservation Europe Marcin Sielezniew, Institute of Biology, University of Bialystok/TOM - Association for Butterfly Conservation, Poland Simon Spencer, British Butterfly Conservation, European Interest Group, Great Britain Andrej Štangler, State Nature Conservancy, PLA Biele Karpaty, Slovakia Chris van Swaay, Butterfly Conservation Europe István Szentirmai, Őrség National Park Directorate, Hungary Ildikó Varga, Ministry of Environment, Hungary Lubomíra Vávrová, Slovakia Lubomír Víťaz, Slovakia Rudi Verovnik, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia Martin Warren, Butterfly Conservation Europe Lifespan of plan/Reviews Recommended citation including ISBN Cover photo: Ľ. Víťaz (Slovakia) Acknowledgements for help and support: Dr. Helmut Höttinger (Austria), Dr. Levente Szekely, Dorel M.
[Show full text]
Serbia and Montenegro Biodiversity Analysis, 2002
FAA SECTION 119 BIODIVERSITY ANALYSIS FOR SERBIA AND MONTENEGRO Prepared for: United States Agency for International Development Mission to the Federal Republics of Yugoslavia Submitted By: Loren L. Schulze and The Environmental Information Systems and Networking Project (Contract No. EE-C-00-98-00001-00) DevTech Systems, Inc. May 2002 Final Report Note This document was prepared under the auspices of United States Agency for International Development (USAID) by a Biodiversity Analysis Team. The team was comprised of Dr. Loren L. Schulze, team leader and consultants from the Environmental Information Systems and Networking Project managed by DevTech Systems, Inc. Dr. Bruce A Byers consultant ecologist was responsible for the ecological analysis and Violeta Orlovic was responsible for the institutional analysis. The statements and opinions expressed herein are not necessarily those of either USAID or DevTech Systems, Inc. Table of Contents Table of Contents ............................................................................................................................... 1 List of Appendices ............................................................................................................................. 3 Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................... 4 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................ 5 Section One: Conservation
[Show full text]